#Need help understanding euclidean
126 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
So the first thing to understand is that Cartesian coordinate systems don't change anything about geometry. They just let us talk about geometry more easily.
They let us describe points with ordered pairs and lines and circles with equations, but they don't change what points, lines, and circles are or how they behave.
Consider Euclid's first proposition, constructing an equilateral triangle from a line segment.
Let's consider the line segment AB in the Cartesian plane. Arbitrarily, let A = (0, 0) and B = (l, 0).
l is therefore the length of line segment AB.
Now let us consider the circle centered at A with radius AB.
In the Cartesian system, that circle is described by the equation x^2 + y^2 = l^2.
The circle centered at B with radius AB is (x - l)^2 + y^2 = l^2.
Now let's find the intersection of these circles.
x^2 + y^2 = (x - l)^2 + y^2
x^2 = x^2 - 2lx + l^2
2lx = l^2
x = l/2
y = +/- sqrt(l^2 - (l/2)^2)
y = +/- sqrt(3)/2 l```
Thus the intersections are (l/2, sqrt(3)/2 l) and (l/2, -sqrt(3)/2 l).
Arbitrarily choose (l/2, sqrt(3)/2 l) and call it C.
Now we know length AC is l, because C is on the circle centered on A with radius l. And we know length BC is l because C is on the circle centered on B with radius l.
We can also just calculate the length directly with the distance formula.
Which is just the Pythagorean theorem, which we do therefore need to prove separately, but that's relatively simple.
Also the distance formula is where we get the equation for a circle.
@pseudo mantle
thank you
but how can I use it to prove certain theorems and get certain angles?
What theorems, in particular?
oh no wait not theorems, I meant how can I prove that something is a certain shape
like "prove that ABCD is a cyclic quad"
ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral if and only if there exists a circle such that A, B, C, and D are on its circumference.
There necessarily exists exactly one circle with A, B, and C on its circumference.
So just draw that circle and see if D's on it.
What a Cartesian coordinate system adds to the process is the ability to describe all the points and lines and circles with algebraic precision.
ahhh I like how u make me think about it from a different perspective
is there any other tricks to solve for certain angles? like I know for a cyclic quad the exterior angle is equal to the interior opposite
however, certain things for euclidean like finding angles are not easy for me
So you don't have to eyeball whether D is on the circle, you can just plug D's coordinates into the equation.
yes I love Algebra, its so much easier for me to solve with that rather than having to figure out which angle is which
I much rather find the gradient and use tan theta = m
yes this is much better, I wanna try this
The big benefit of Cartesian coordinates is the ability to convert back and forth between algebra and geometry at will. To demonstrate why this is, tell me, how would you find the circumcircle of a triangle?
adding the lenghts of all 3 sides of the triangle
...what?
๐ฌ๐ฌI told u I'm bad at geometry
What do you think a circumcircle is?
circumcircle?
well sounds like the lenght around the circle to me
bruh
The circumcircle is the circle which is circumscribed about some figure.
The circle which passes through all of its vertices.
lemme see a graphic demonstration real quick
ohhhhhhhhhhhh
yeah and then u can find angles in a semi circle = 90 degrees right?
...what?
what I've been taught, is when you see the triangle in the circle then its angles in the semi circle
but that doesnt look like its cutting it correctly to become an angle in the semi circle
"Its angles in the semicircle" isn't even a complete sentence.
I suck at geometry more than anything, its weighing me down so all I know is this and that
I meant angles in a semi circle
...yes. That's exactly what you said. That wasn't a sentence.
The article is not what makes it not a sentence.
I'm sorry, but do I seriously have to explain to you what does or doesn't make something a sentence right now?
but I saw in one of my textbooks that its smth in euclidean where the triangle inside a circle, if the diameter cuts half the circle and the 2 radii for a triangle with it then its angles in a semi circle
no I understand, I just didnt explain myself
"Its angles in a semicircle" still isn't a sentence.
no thats a reason
I guess I am going to have to explain how sentences work.
A sentence has three parts. Subject, verb, object.
"Its angles in a semicircle" is a noun phrase. It's only a subject or an object.
we going back to grade 8 ๐
๐
I understand this
I forgot to add the apostrophe by the its
"it's angles in a semi circle", thats what I meant
Okay, what does that mean?
if the diameter cuts half the circle and the 2 radii of a triangle with it then it's angles in a semi circle
also angles in a semi circle must be equal to 90 degrees
"2 radii for a triangle"???
ok nvm, just radii
the 2 was just redundancy
idk how to explain, lemme get a picture or smth
A triangle doesn't have radii.
I know what you're trying to say, I'm just trying to get you to realize that you don't.
Not to be mean.
But because you can't learn until you admit you don't know.
no but this specific one inside the circle needs radii to construct a triangle
yeah I dont know at all, thats why I'm trying to explain myself ๐คฃ
ask me anything in algebra I can use my head and try to figure it out
but, for geometry I'm like a dumbass
...that's not how that works. How do you expect to be able to explain something you don't know?
I'm trying to but I'm failing
You were probably taught wrong. I don't blame you. But you need to be willing to unlearn what you think you know to be able to learn correctly.
yeah I'm willing to
anything please, before the end of this year I needa master euclidean coz I need that report to be juicy with those good marks for math
Okay, so then you don't actually understand at all what you were talking about before, right?
yes, I'm making myself look like an idiot here now ๐
but, I dont mind, as long as I learn smth
No, dude.
You look ignorant because you are ignorant. You're here because you're ignorant, to become less ignorant. What makes you look like an idiot is trying to pretend you're not ignorant.
Here's how it's gonna go. I'm gonna explain the thing you think you understand. If you remember something you feel is related, keep your mouth shut. If something seems logical, then you can bring it up.
Deal @pseudo mantle?
ok go ahead
Okay.
So first let's talk about circumcircles.
Every triangle has a circumcircle, and we're gonna prove it.
A circumcircle is a circle which passes through all the vertices of a polygon.
A polygon is a shape made of line segments that share endpoints, and its vertices are those endpoints.
So what does it mean for a triangle to have a circumcircle? What is a circle?
for a triangle to have a circumcircle it has to have the circle touch the vertices of the triangle, or in other words the 3 points of the triangle must touch the circumference of a circle
and a circle is a shape with no points
ahhh wait visually thinking about it, that makes sense
Right.
Which means, if the vertices of a triangle, call them A, B, and C, are all on the same circle, maybe call its center O, what does that imply?
wdym what does that imply?
I mean, we have these premises:```
- A, B, and C are all on the same circle with center O.
- A point is on a circle with radius r and center X if and only if it is a distance r from X.```What conclusion can we draw from this?
maybe my comprehension is detereorating during this holiday, but lemme try, I'm trying to visualise it:
soo does that mean that its a right angled triangle?
call me stupid behind the screen but I'm poor at this
but I want to learn
Where did I say anything about a "right angle"?
u didnt
Right. The conclusion can only contain terms that the premises contained.
wait, I thought of smth else
is the point a tangent?
Tangent to what?
to A,B,C
...did I say the word "tangent"?
Here are your premises. Your conclusion may contain only words I said in these premises.
@pseudo mantle
@pseudo mantle The conclusion is "A, B, and C are all a distance r from O."
ohhh ok makes a bit of sense
why doesnt the esc key work anymore
It didn't work for me a few days ago but does now.
Anyway.
So we wish to prove that there exists a point which is the same distance from A, B, and C.
and what is that point?
What do you mean, what is the point?
The point is arbitrary because A, B, and C are arbitrary (but noncolinear).
oh yeah makes sense
ok I'mma go sleep, I'll reply when I'm awake
Fair enough.
@pseudo mantle
Hello .fanaduck., this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.