#Natural Emergence of Mathematical Concepts originating from One.
oak rune
Right
To "make a two" you have to apply an operation to one, which you are implicitly doing
But then you must define that operation
wispy tendon
Copying it
wispy tendon
i think a three year old would get it
oak rune
I hope you understand that I know what you're trying to do. You're just not doing it properly
Because mathematically speaking, "having two ones" doesn't make any sense
That's up to you to understand that
oak rune
There is no point in leaving this thread open then
wispy tendon
Someone who knows what two is (a child knows) will read the PDF and enjoy its ideas and make sense out of it.
an egg cell knows
it's about consciousness
thought makes things, and a mind cannot make two without knowing one.
night bay
Damn.
Axiom: There is one God who made one whole creation; one heaven and one earth.
Result: 1+1 = 2
okay wtf is this
there are 2 numbers, ergo we have twodimentional space, ergo we have root(2) and root(5)
It starts of as a construction of N with a hint of Christianity, and then it loses all sense
You cannot write root(5) if you
-haven't defined what the root-symbol means,
-haven't defined multiplication,
-haven't assumed pythagoras,
-haven't even defined 5, the exact number you're trying to take the root of
You cannot just assume 1 exists, add 1+1 to get 2, and then root(5) follow logically.
What you're trying to do here has been done by countless people and has been taught to every first year math student.
You first define N, either from axioms or from a set-theoretic approach. Then you define Z, then you define Q, then you define R, somewhere within these constructions you've also defined add/minus/multiplication/division, and from there you define more functions, such as the square-root.
You're trying to do the same but less systematically, going number by number, and using functions/numbers you've not yet defined.