#Stanford Entry Test Question(Grade 12 maths)
80 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
Identify the possible values of x first. Then square both sides.
And then?
Well, you'll only have one square root left, so isolate it on one side and square again.
And then it's easy.
Let me solve
first get rid of the square root for 4 then make the common denominator 2
then it will be easier to simplify
now expand both sides and rearrange
Oh. Not quite what I had in mind, but this will also work.
Speak your mind aswell please
Well, I was thinking more in terms of (√((x + 10)/2) + √(x - 5))^2 = 36, but that doesn't matter that much.
Why doesn’t this method work?
Uh... Well, because ln(x + y) is not ln(x) + ln(y).
oh. RIGHT It's ln(xy)
No but then still ln(xy) = ln(x) + ln(y)
so ln(0.5(x+10)) = ln(0.5) + ln(x+10)
yea that part is correct
so where is the wrong
but here we have the power
second last line
Because that's like taking ln(a+b) = ln6
And you went to expand lna +lnb = ln6
Yes
So you can't progress much and simplify by taking ln on either side
tHIS EXPANSION IS CORRECT?
its better to expand $$\sqrt\frac{2x+20}{4} = 6-(x-5)^\frac{1}{2}$$
Huang
Okay but i dont get why i cant use ln
for ln? yes
becoz
okay
.
you cant do much with ln(a+b)=ln6
its a dead end
Wait let me process
Why would you use logarithms here?
You square, isolate a root, then square again. Then it'll be a polynomial equation.
Yes yes I can, but there's no harm in exploring other ways
Well, I guess. But I can't really see any other ways here.
Then the question comes, "why not this way?" Whats wrong
yes but thats what you did in ur working
Well, as discussed above, you attempted to use a property ln(a + b) = ln(a) + ln(b), which is wrong.
Yes.
but this is being multiplied? Its [0.5 x (x+10)]^0.5
and ik that ln(ab) = ln(a) + ln(b)
Isnt this what you did
You expanded and like multiplied the ln
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
.
YEAH YEAH I GET IT NOW
The expansion of ln for this term is correct
Okay so what if
If we ignore the question
yea?
yep
theres no point honestly
its better to just separate the variables and square both sides
Please thank the helpers who assisted you by clicking the buttons below. You can thank each helper only once. Once you're done, click "Close Post" to close this thread.

. They now have 21