#Regular Curves
27 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
it's clear that $\gamma'(t)\neq 0$ for $t\neq0$
Omegabet_
You can directly compute that $\gamma'(0)=(1,0,0)$ using the usual definition
Omegabet_
would that be using the limits from either side?
yes
but how doi reconcile that with the actual value at 0
wdym
wait I think I get it
the fact it's 0 is irrelevant (bar making the function an actual curve lol)
fair
the derivative isn't rly defined well for the t = 0 because it's just a point
not a function
the curve is well defined on R
yes, you're just computing $\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{1}{h}\gamma(h)$
Omegabet_
which follows from the fact $\lim_{h\to 0}h^2\exp(-1/h^2)=0$
Omegabet_
yeah thanks for the help
@grim jackal
Hello .blinch, this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.