#direct sum of Lie algebra

30 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

keen sand
#

Given a unitary matrix $U$ and given a direct sum of Lie algebras all being subalgebras of the Lie algebra of skew-Hermitian operators, e.g. $\mathfrak{su}(n) \oplus \mathfrak{su}(n)$. How do can I check whether or not there exists $g$ in the Lie algebra s.t. $U = e^g$.

hasty patioBOT
#
  1. Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  2. Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
  3. Do not ping other members randomly for help.
  4. Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
  5. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  6. If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:

+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:

naive lagoon
#

a unitary what?

#

is unitary a noun?

#

unitary group?

keen sand
#

a unitary matrix

naive lagoon
#

formulate your question more precisely, this is difficult to read

#

what does "lie algebra generated by hermitian" mean? what's the algebra, what's the bracket?

keen sand
#

I mean any subalgebra of the algebra of all skew-Hermitian operators where the Lie bracket is i times the commutator

naive lagoon
#

see? that's details

#

write it down please

keen sand
#

did edit 🙂

#

thanks for the suggestions!

keen sand
#

@naive lagoon I rephrased the question, is it lacking any details anymore?

naive lagoon
#

If I'm reading this right you're asking how to check whether a unitary matrix is in SU(n) x SU(n)

#

but then you're effectively asking whether U(n) is "isomorphic" to SU(n) x SU(n)

#

but you can't argue "up to isomorphism" in this context, when you apply isomorphisms (or even automorphisms) on a lie group of matrices, you get a new group

naive lagoon
#

if you're trying to formulate your argument up to isomorphism, then you need to reconsider, cuz that won't work

#

@keen sand

naive lagoon
#

I have no idea what you'll find tho

#

I haven't thought about lie groups from this angle

keen sand
#

@naive lagoon let me phrase it differently, Given a generator set of a lie algebra ${g_k}k$ (and I even now that this lie algebra is e.g. $su \oplus su $) is there a way to efficiently check wheter I can write a given unitary matrix as $U =\prod_l \prod_k e^{ \alpha{lk} g_k } $?

naive lagoon
#

a given unitary matrix

keen sand
#

yes

lean stagBOT
real trellisBOT
#

@keen sand

:HelpIcon:| Help Reminder

Hello oxana6644, this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.

real trellisBOT
#

@naive lagoon The user still needs help with this help request.