#Found this in a Linear Algebra textbook, wondering if it's correct?
38 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
It might mean (1, 1, 2). A typo.
Wait, but then that wouldn't be true either.
But you can see from the equations that (1, 1, 1) isn't a point on either suface.
(1,1,root(2)) would work
If you change the second surface to "z=.." you could use (1, 1, 2) as an example.
That doesn't work for the first surface.
oh shit you're right, it's not z^2
Yea... should I just abandon this textbook
What book?
which book is it?
Fundamentals of Linear Algebra by James B. Carrell
Yep
alright what page
well, the argument is correct provided solutions exist
just need to replace the 1,1,1 with a proper solution
im not really a fan of the structure of the notes tho
you're better off working with some other linear algebra text
Gotchu, are there any textbooks that you recommend
bingo
there's also lots of problems and further exposition
Oooo thanks, I think I needed this resource lol.
For context, I'm self learning linear algebra after my undergraduate because I didn't pay attention in maths (due to online during covid).
Noted! TY
@lethal pasture
Hello betyouwontcatchmelacking, this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.