Is this right?!
#Integrals
vale tide
timber lynxBOT
Is this right?!
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
manic ridge
Is this right?!
It's missing the absolute value, in which case it doesn't matter what the order is.
Also, note that (e^x + 1)/(e^x - 1) = coth(x/2), so it might be easier to take the integral that way.
vale tide
It's missing the absolute value, in which case it doesn't matter what the order ...
thanks 😊
hybrid skiff
differentiate and see if you get the integrand
vale tide
How do I get this answer? I got another one that it’s also correct but idk how to get this one.
queen ridge
Is this right?!
it's 2ln(e^x-1)-x for all x positive
manic ridge
How do I get this answer? I got another one that it’s also correct but idk how t...
It would be the answer if you integrated 1/(x^2 - 9).
queen ridge
It would be the answer if you integrated 1/(x^2 - 9).
yes
to get the reciprocal form of coth(x)
which is equal to 1/2(ln((x-1)/(x+1)))
manic ridge
Well, hyperbolic cotangent doesn't quite work, since the domain is too narrow.
heavy geyserBOT
@vale tide