#Basic Linear Algebra
18 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
If we have an n⨯n matrix A such that A^k = 0, then rk(A) ≤ ⌊n(k - 1)/k⌋.
Sources:
https://math.stackexchange.com/a/863077
https://math.stackexchange.com/a/863087
I came across the fact that the rank of a $n \times n$-matrix A with $A^2=0$ is at most $\frac{n}{2}$. The easiest way to proof this is using the inequality $\operatorname{rank}(A)+\operatorname{ra...
Aah I see
@steady drum you can also use the classification of nilpotent matrices in terms of integer partitions
(that's probably where this result come from)
A² ≠ 0 and A⁴=0, thus you know that the sequence λi = dim (Ker(A^(i)) / Ker(A^(i-1))) satisfies λ1≥λ2≥ … ≥ λ6 with Σ λi = 6, λ5 = λ6 = 0. Then doing all the partitions (there are 5 of them) gives that the dimension of the kernel is either 2 or 3, hence that the rank is either 3 or 4.
Aah what exactly kernel mean here?
ker A = {x st Ax = 0}
how do you prove that for the sequence? #math-discussion
you can do this in an elementary way, it is called the iterated kernels lemma. Denoting Ki=Ker A^i, then
- Ki c Ki+1
- there is an injective map Ki+1/Ki-> Ki/Ki-1
Thus, the sequence lambdai satisfies the announced relations because since A is nilpotent, Kn=V for some n <= 6.
Thus,you car just en umerate integer partitions.
Conversely, given any integer partition, it is not that hard to construct an explicit matrix having these lambdai.
thank you for the explanation
Aah basically map to null vectors 😭
(you start from the map A : Ki+1->Ki, then A^(-1) (Ki-1) = Ki, thus you get the injection using the first isomorphism theorem)
Man how rusty I got in LA
@steady drum
Hello ratnanidhi, this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.