#Hausdorff distance and compact sets.

18 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

woven laurel
#

I have an answer for the first part of the question, thank you for verifying if the answer is right, and also help me with the example

English traduction :
Let ( K_1 ) and ( K_2 ) be two disjoint compact subsets of a metric space ( (M, d) ). Show that the Hausdorff distance between ( K_1 ) and ( K_2 ), defined by
[
d_H(K_1, K_2) = \inf {d(x_1, x_2) \mid x_1 \in K_1, x_2 \in K_2},
]
is always strictly positive. Find an example of two disjoint non-compact subsets ( K_1 ) and ( K_2 ) such that ( d_H(K_1, K_2) = 0 ).

solar stormBOT
#
  1. Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  2. Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
  3. Do not ping other members randomly for help.
  4. Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
  5. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  6. If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:

+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:

patent tulipBOT
#

Vermithor

woven laurel
#

That's the answer I have found :

To prove that ( d_H(K_1, K_2) > 0 ), observe the following:

  • Since ( K_1 ) and ( K_2 ) are disjoint, ( d(x_1, x_2) > 0 ) for all ( x_1 \in K_1 ) and ( x_2 \in K_2 ).
  • Furthermore, compactness ensures that the infimum is achieved as a minimum because the function ( d(x_1, x_2) ) is continuous and the product ( K_1 \times K_2 ) is compact.
  • Therefore, there exists ( (x_1, x_2) \in K_1 \times K_2 ) such that ( d_H(K_1, K_2) = d(x_1, x_2) > 0 ).

Thus, ( d_H(K_1, K_2) > 0 ) when ( K_1 ) and ( K_2 ) are compact and disjoint.

patent tulipBOT
#

Vermithor

upbeat badge
#

Compactness and continuity of (x,y)—>d(x,y) on K1 x K2, ensures that the inf is attained

woven laurel
#

perfect, thank you so much, what about an exemple of two disjoint non compact subsets K1 and K2 such that d(K1,K2) = 0 ? what should I think of ?

upbeat badge
#

like in R, Q and R\Q

woven laurel
#

You have always the best exemples ever,
thanks a lot !

#

Considérons l'exemple suivant :

( K_1 = {x \in \mathbb{R} \mid x > 0}, \quad K_2 = {x \in \mathbb{R} \mid x < 0}. )

Ces deux sous-ensembles sont :

  • Non compacts : ils ne sont pas bornés ni fermés.
  • Disjoints : ( K_1 \cap K_2 = \emptyset ).

Calculons la distance de Hausdorff ( d_H(K_1, K_2) ). Par définition :

[
d_H(K_1, K_2) = \inf { d(x_1, x_2) \mid x_1 \in K_1, , x_2 \in K_2 }.
]

Pour tout ( \epsilon > 0 ), il existe ( x_1 \in K_1 ) et ( x_2 \in K_2 ) tels que :

[
|x_1 - x_2| < \epsilon.
]

Par exemple, en choisissant ( x_1 = \frac{\epsilon}{2} ) et ( x_2 = -\frac{\epsilon}{2} ), nous avons :

[
|x_1 - x_2| = \left| \frac{\epsilon}{2} - \left(-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\right) \right| = \epsilon.
]

Cela montre que ( d_H(K_1, K_2) = 0 ).

patent tulipBOT
#

Vermithor

woven laurel
#

Chatgpt proposed this as well, seems so right to me, what do u think ?

upbeat badge
#

Yeah works as well

woven laurel
#

+close

hidden mulchBOT
# woven laurel +close
Do you still want to close your help request?

No eligible helpers were found in this thread. You can still close this post if you don't require helper any longer.