#Proving inequality of 3 surds without finding their values.

29 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

pure marsh
#

Let a = $\sqrt(52)$, b = $\sqrt(50)$ and c = $\sqrt(2)$.
Without finding their actual values, is it possible to prove that
a + b > c
a + c > b
b + c > a
This is part of a coordinate geometry problem where we are asked to prove that 3 points form a triangle

cobalt sundialBOT
#

devooko

cloud canopyBOT
#
  1. Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
  2. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  3. If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
    +close
    
  4. Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
  5. Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules. **Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
  6. If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
hollow tartan
#

triangle inequality

#

oh, you want to prove that they form a triangle

pure marsh
#

yes

hollow tartan
#

a+b > c and a+c > b should be simple enough, as a>b>c

pure marsh
#

wait one min I have one other doubt, isnt it enough to prove that the points are not collinear to show that they form a triangle ?

hollow tartan
#

for b+c>a, square both sides and collect like terms

hollow tartan
pure marsh
#

I mean when points are given

hollow tartan
pure marsh
#

yes, I know, but before that we have to prove that it is indeed a triangle right ? We cant just directly write "since a^2 + b^2 = c^2, the points form a right triangle" right ?

hollow tartan
#

this was before i realized that the question required a proof of them forming a triangle

hollow tartan
hollow tartan
pure marsh
#

wait lemme try

#

Um actually I havent learned inequalities just yet, but I would like to learn. Could you expand on what you mean by "for b+c>a, square both sides and collect like terms"

#

wait never mind got it, so we assume that it is greater, then square, then arrive at a true statement, then we conclude that the original inequality is true.

#

Wow, thank you sir, I asked this to my maths teacher but she just told me to do it like in the textbook.

#

Much appreciate it, may god bless you 🙂

hollow tartan
#

because making assumptions is quite hard to do properly

pure marsh
#

ok..

#

+close

worldly raptorBOT
# pure marsh +close
Please thank your Helpers before closing!

Please thank the helpers who assisted you by clicking the buttons below. You can thank each helper only once. Once you're done, click "Close Post" to close this thread.

worldly raptorBOT
# worldly raptor

Thank you for your feedback! flying unpurple people eater has been awarded 1 point. They now have 1 total points. They have 3 daily points left for today.

worldly raptorBOT
#

@pure marsh

<:HelpIcon:1304095958283321385>| Help Reminder

Hello devooko, this is a friendly reminder that your thread has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command.