#Projection & vector component

43 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

umbral dew
#

Can someone please help me out with this?

sage stoneBOT
#
  1. Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
  2. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  3. Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
    +close
    
  4. Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
  5. Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  6. If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
sly spoke
umbral dew
#

Is the answer for a) <7,9> ?

sly spoke
#

no

umbral dew
#

What is it then?

sly spoke
#

compute it and find out

#

post your work if you want me to check your work...

umbral dew
#

Alright hold on

sly spoke
#

as common sense would dictate

umbral dew
sly spoke
#

just compute the scalar in front of v, then scale v

#

It's clear from computation $\frac{u\cdot v}{v\cdot v}=\frac{9\times 1+7\times 3}{1^2+3^2}=\frac{30}{10}=3$

fluid bronzeBOT
#

Omegabet_

umbral dew
#

Can you answer in a more respectful way and a bit clearer

sly spoke
#

Explain what isnt clear

#

I assume you know how to compute dot products

umbral dew
#

I don’t know what you just did

sly spoke
#

I computed the scalar

#

in the formula

#

recall the formula

#

$P_v(u):=\frac{u\cdot v}{v\cdot v}v$

fluid bronzeBOT
#

Omegabet_

sly spoke
#

from computation, it's evident (u.v)/(v.v) = 3

#

so $P_v(u)=3v=(3,9)$

fluid bronzeBOT
#

Omegabet_

umbral dew
#

Ohhh ok

#

I got it

#

Thank youu

#

What about b

sly spoke
#

what about it?

umbral dew
#

Is it correct?

sly spoke
#

no

#

From drawing it, it's clear $u=P_v(u)+z$ where $z\perp v$

fluid bronzeBOT
#

Omegabet_

umbral dew
#

Is it (6,-2)?

sly spoke
#

yes.

umbral dew
#

Okk thank youu

sly spoke
#

$z:=u-P_v(u)$

fluid bronzeBOT
#

Omegabet_

umbral dew
#

+close