This is from a book of Terence Tao for Measure theory and he is defining the Lebesgue integral. What I don't understand is this part. If we use a Veen diagram and let's say we have the picture below we only have 5 (at most 6 if we include the empty set as the intersection of B and C). What does he mean by 2^k?
#Can there not be less than 2^k subsets? I don't get it what he means by this?
30 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close - Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
If more context is need here is the link to the PDF: https://terrytao.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/gsm-126-tao5-measure-book.pdf
Page 66
or if ppl are scared of links just search: "Terence Tao measure theory" and it should be the first link
Oh I think I see it now
The other sets, C intersect B, C intersect A, C intersect A intersect B are counted separate even though all of them are the null set and still disjoint ( their interesection is still the empty set)
But isn't this a bit of a strech since we also say that it can partitioned into 2^k + 17 other empty sets
per the definition of partitions, the sets arent empty
so I dont see why you're considering empty sets in your partitions
he means if you list out the partition
also why would there be a problem with including empty sets in your partition
there are 2^k sets
cause then there's no equivalence relation that generates it
and it's known a collection of sets is a partition iff it's a set of equivalence classes
Like in the 2 set example (k=2), you have your partition as ${A\setminus(A\cap B),A\cap B, B\setminus(A\cap B),U\setminus(A\cup B)}$ for universal set $U$
Omegabet_