#Please explain this
37 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close - Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
I dont get it guys😢
Do you know what similar triangles are?
ye syes
or rather, proportional ones
I think that would be more appropriate for us
so if you have two triangles that have the same angles, one version is just a scaled version of the other
Not in the proper sense of the triangle proportionality theorem
but you get the idea
<KIN is impossible to be 90 degrees, am i seeing something wrong?
Why would it be impossible
I don't see a reason why
idk the i'm seeing something wrong
Anyway, the point is
this looks very not to scale
KIN is similar to DIN
yeah cause it's a sloppy figure
mk
but I can assure you that such a triangle exists
to convince you, take a compass and use the midpoint O of [KN]
omg thank you
draw the circle of center O and of radius ON
and shoot a perpendicular to [KN] through D
that will give you said figure
Anyway, back to you
KIN is similar to DIN, I want you to explain to me why
and after that you can derive the rest of the lengths
cuz DIN is a smaller version of KIN and they have the same angle
"they have the same angles" is a good explanation enough
could you tell me what angle is equal to what angle?
angle K= angle N and Angle I = angle D