#probabilistics meme

31 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

thick marlin
#

So, how would u understand this? Ofc next surgery still has a 50% rate, but having 21 succeeds in a row is pretty unlikely.
So the probability for the next patient to survive is 50% or 0.5^21?
Id say 0.5, so the meme is indeed incorrect, but not sure

void minnowBOT
#
  1. Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
  2. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  3. Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
    +close
    
  4. Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
  5. Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  6. If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
indigo edge
#

The probability shouldn't depend on what happened before. So, still 1/2.

thick marlin
#

Idk if the meme means that a mormal ppl will trust the doctor cuz 20 ppl survived in a row and the dark side is cuz it is still 50%, or if the author meant that the dark side is cuz having 21 in a row is almost 0

indigo edge
#

I believe there's a fallacy associated with it. Don't remember what it's called, though.

indigo edge
#

If I roll a six 20 times on a dice, that just means I got lucky, not that the probability of getting a 6 isn't 1/6.

feral pulsar
left wedge
#

this bias of "it happened before these many times so it's even rarer" is what doesn't let us keep A in the exam 4 times

zinc orbit
indigo edge
zinc orbit
indigo edge
#

Still, a sample size of 20 is too small to make any meaningful assumptions.

zinc orbit
#

I mean, what's the proportion of fair D6es to loaded ones?

indigo edge
#

I don't think there's a fixed amount.

#

Hm... Are loaded dice manufactured in large amounts? Or are they usually made to order?

zinc orbit
indigo edge
zinc orbit
#

Obviously they're significantly rarer than fair dice, but if they're any more common than one in 3 quadrillion, 20 sixes in a row is significant evidence.

indigo edge
#

Hm, yeah, fair, I guess.

#

Though, if those 20 sixes in a row were in an experiment with, say, 10000 throws, then that's less significant.

zinc orbit
#

I mean, depending on the other 9980 throws.

indigo edge
#

Of course.

zinc orbit
#

I mean, 20 sixes in a row is still significant evidence, it's just that the other 9980 throws, given they're sufficiently random, are even stronger anti-evidence.

indigo edge
#

Yeah.

#

This kinda reminds me of an article?/book? I've read a while ago on distribution of runs.

#

Don't really remember it, though.

#

I think I do have an article on my PC on distribution of range, though.