#norm spaces

115 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

edgy wedge
#

can someone please explain to me what it means for these sequences to be a closed subspace?

junior peakBOT
#
  1. Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
  2. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  3. Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
    +close
    
  4. Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
  5. Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  6. If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
prime crypt
#

closed means complement is open

#

in metric spaces closedness is convenient to check with limits

#

e.g for 1. suppose you have a sequence of elements in l ^inf satisfying a_0 = 0 converging to some element in l ^inf, is that element also in this set?

#

@edgy wedge

#

as usual, convergence means norm of the difference converges to zero

edgy wedge
#

im still trying to wrap my head around norm spaces

prime crypt
#

you've dealt with sequence of real/complex numbers yes?

edgy wedge
#

just random sequences?

#

like a_n=1/n, a_n=n^2 etc?

prime crypt
#

for example

#

now you have a sequence of elements of this set

edgy wedge
#

so we have sequences that are part of l^inf with the initial condition a_0=0?

prime crypt
#

yes, and we assume the sequence converges to some element in l^inf

#

is that element also necessarily in this set?

edgy wedge
#

like we can take the sup of a sequence

prime crypt
#

that's the norm in l^inf

edgy wedge
#

oh

prime crypt
#

$$ |(x_1,x_2,\ldots)| := \sup |x_i|$$

red windBOT
edgy wedge
#

ye okie

#

so what does l^inf mean?

#

sorry i couldnt follow my lecturers explanation so im struggling with bunch of concepts in functional analysis

prime crypt
#

look up the definition

edgy wedge
#

so a sequence in l^inf is just bounded?

prime crypt
#

yes, because otherwise

prime crypt
edgy wedge
#

ye

prime crypt
#

which is no good

edgy wedge
prime crypt
#

in any normed space

#

$$ a_n \to a \Leftrightarrow |a_n-a|\to 0 $$

red windBOT
edgy wedge
#

okie

prime crypt
#

now apply it to your problem

edgy wedge
#

there's a value a s.t $\norm{a_n-a}<\epsilon \forall \epsilon>0$

red windBOT
#

naokye

edgy wedge
#

sooo

#

we're given a_n is in l^inf

#

hence msut be bounded

prime crypt
#

firstly what does it mean in l^inf norm terms?

edgy wedge
#

sup(x_n)

#

wait

#

sup|x_n|

prime crypt
#

norm of difference

edgy wedge
#

sup|a_n-a|?

prime crypt
#

yes

#

but more specifically

edgy wedge
#

sup|a_n-a|<e

prime crypt
#

$$ \sup |a^n_i-a_i| $$

edgy wedge
#

for all e>0

prime crypt
#

you don't take supremum of the sequence but its components

edgy wedge
#

that ^n isn't a power right

prime crypt
#

it's an index

edgy wedge
#

okie

#

so the differenece of different sequences?

prime crypt
#

$$ a^n = (a^n_0, a^n_1,\ldots) $$

edgy wedge
#

so we have a sequence of sequences?

prime crypt
#

correct

edgy wedge
#

damn

#

this is wild

prime crypt
#

your sequences start with index 0 tho yes?

edgy wedge
#

ye

red windBOT
edgy wedge
#

but we have sequence of sequences but all starts with a_0=0?

prime crypt
#

for each n a^n_0 = 0

#

by assumption

edgy wedge
#

ye

prime crypt
#

does it follow that a_0 = 0?

edgy wedge
prime crypt
#

that's what you have to check for closedness

#

is the limit of the sequence a^n also in the set?

edgy wedge
#

i see

prime crypt
#

and what's the condition for a sequence to be in the set..?

edgy wedge
edgy wedge
#

and a_0=0

prime crypt
#

not converges

#

bounded

edgy wedge
#

oh ye

#

ofc

prime crypt
#

it has to be l^inf and also a_0 = 0

#

we can assume a in l^inf, so we only need to check a_0 = 0

#

if this is true, then the set is closed

edgy wedge
#

ohhh right

prime crypt
#

$$ a^n_0 = 0\forall n,\ \sup |a^n_i-a_i| \to 0 \overset{?}\Rightarrow a_0 = 0 $$

red windBOT
prime crypt
#

the answer is an obvious yes

#

just think about what it means when supremum over all indices converges to 0

edgy wedge
prime crypt
#

supremum is taken w.r.t components of the sequence

edgy wedge
#

okie...

edgy wedge
#

did we assume that a_n converges?

prime crypt
#

yes

#

a^n -> a by assumption

#

that's this part here

edgy wedge
#

okie ye this is decently ocming together now

#

so for a sequence to be closed, the limit converges to smth in the set?

prime crypt
#

set is closed if and only if it contains all its limit points

#

that's what we're testing

#

we take an arbitrary limit point of this subset and check whether it also is contained in the subset

edgy wedge
#

okie

#

tysm for your help!

#

ill trye to attempt the otehr two questions now

#

.close

winged sequoiaBOT
#

Unable to parse the channel name

edgy wedge
#

oh

#

+close