#Equation
78 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
Express the second derivative, then integrate twice.
check that this Vx satisfies the definition
there is a typo tho, what they mean in the usual sense is
$$ \frac{d^2 V_x}{dy^2} $$
aL
Ah, yeah.
Or that, yeah.
Though, it's still pretty easy to solve.
@vast sail
I Still don't how to do it
Yes that's what I meant
Sorry if the image was wrong
Well, we have:
d^2 v/dy^2 = -ΔP/(μL)
First, integrate this once.
By variable separation?
You don't need to do that, you can just integrate.
How
I don't know how to do it without variable separation
Well, just integrate...
If you have d^2 y/dx^2 = A, then you get dy/dx = Ax + C.
$$ -\mu\frac{dV_x}{dy} = \frac{\Delta P}{L}y + C_1 $$
aL
$$\frac-{ΔP}{µL}$$ = $$ \frac{dV_x}{dy} $$
Gluwxy
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
that just means ... = V_x + C
which is not true
integral and derivative cancel each other
Hm... Well, alright. Then do this:
d(dv/dx) = (-ΔP/(μL))dx
Then integrate.

A little odd, though. Surely you know that ∫((dy/dx)dx) = y + C.
Oh I see just eliminate integral symbol
Whith the first image I sent or the second one
Of the result in my notebook
$$ -\mu \frac{d^2 V_x}{dy^2} = \frac{\Delta P}{L} \Rightarrow -\mu\frac{dV_x}{dy} = \frac{\Delta P}{L}y + C_1 $$
aL
that's what you should get after integrating once
Why you kept µ in the left side
Doesn't really matter.
It's a constant, we can keep it on either side.
aL
and apply
It's probably better to apply the initial condition first, then integrate.
Then we won't get an equation with two constants.
Sure
how would you apply IC after integrating once?
just because you know Vx = 0 says nothing about how the derivative behaves at that point
Ah, sorry! I didn't notice. We have boundary conditions, not really initial ones.
Well, of course this is a differential equation. An elementary one, though.
Solved by just integrating.
when was this ever in doubt?
Are you sure that the result of doing that metod is the same as the result in the image I sent?
which image
Well is because someone told me that is by order reduction
which is another way of saying "integrating"
you start with 2nd order equation, you integrate, order reduces to 1
integrate again, order reduces to 0
I showed you two ways of "demonstrating the solution" as is required by the exercise
But with 2 constants how i'll apply the CI