#Getting equation from this unknown graph[tried everything)

97 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

brazen glen
#

So been dealing with quite a challenging problem of trying to get the equation for this function or even defining it because it is so crappingly drawn it defies form(the example graph is more curvy upwards at the end while mine is a consistent curve towards the end towards positive infinity.I guess browsing free textbooks pdfs on the internet, you get what you pay for. From my work the equation seems logarithmic because the equation hits all the points(starts at negative 5,crosses y axis at 2 and resembles the curve shown in example graph, it just looks different. Accompanied is also my algebra work on this problem. Thank you for the help!

random crownBOT
#
  1. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  2. Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
  1. Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
  2. Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  3. If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
brazen glen
#

though im starting to think it's exponential but am not sure i did calculations and equation just didnt match,will do these again

sonic hollow
# brazen glen

this is more cubic/odd degree polynomial than anything

#

like the blue one has a horizontal tangent at 0, logs dont have critical values where their derivative is 0

brazen glen
#

ah it smelled like cubic little to me.hmm will have to do calculations over again.though to me it seems like a polynomial more

sonic hollow
#

... cubics are polynomials

#

they're polynomials with degree 3.

brazen glen
#

ah my bad

sonic hollow
#

But yeah, that picture is clearly not a log

#

the arrows imply the domain is the entire real line

#

logs have vertical asymptotes

#

logs dont plataeu anywhere

brazen glen
#

though idk how would i form an equation for this considering it only has one x value of -5

sonic hollow
#

well you know it's of the form $p(x)=a(x+5)(x^2+bx+c)$, so use the other aspects to find $a,b,c$.

sharp urchinBOT
#

Omegabet_

brazen glen
#

okay

#

thanks

brazen glen
#

can anyone explain how to do the calculations ahead,i tried synthethic divisions but didnt get many results :/

#

i think long division might be neccesary here?

#

with like the whole polynomial instead of the factored form?

#

nermind im a moron,i think i know my problem now

#

i foiled the placeholder b which i likely shouldnt have

brazen glen
#

Getting equation from this unknown graph[tried everything)

#

so now I tried the cubic form as suggested and it didnt give me any graph,what i managed to come up only is an equation that doesnt give me any graph.
here is my work

#

so its maybe a cubic,not a quadratic,not an exponential,not a logarithmic. idk anymore tbh

opaque wraith
brazen glen
#

idk seems quite poorly drawn if you ask me

opaque wraith
sonic hollow
#

well like I said at the start, from guessing it's a cubic and knowing x=-5 is a root, you know $p(x)=a(x+5)(x^2+bx+c)$, you also know $p(0)=2$ and $p'(0)=0$ (or at the very least, those are immediate, approximate features)

sharp urchinBOT
#

Omegabet_

opaque wraith
#

P(-5)=0
P(0)=2
P(3)=4
P(4)=5

sonic hollow
#

2, not -2

opaque wraith
#

right

brazen glen
#

i dont get p(3) and p(4)

opaque wraith
#

you'll see it if you squint hard enough

sonic hollow
#

approximately, p(4)=3 amd p(5)=4

opaque wraith
#

5->4?

sonic hollow
#

blue graph is the cubic

opaque wraith
#

i was talking about the purple

#

it's also a cubic

brazen glen
#

the purple doesnt matter i need the blue one

sonic hollow
#

inverse of a cubic isnt a cubic though

opaque wraith
#

i mean is it really the inverse

#

or is it reflected along y=x

sonic hollow
#

it's symmetric about y=x

opaque wraith
#

ye

sonic hollow
#

so yes, inverse

opaque wraith
#

yeah sure just find the cubic and solve that shit

sonic hollow
opaque wraith
#

honestly a dick problem to be blunt

#

points appearing to be on convenient integer points

brazen glen
#

which coeficients are relevant for blue graph only?

#

im guessing
P(-5)=0
P(0)=2
P(5)=6

sonic hollow
#

those arent coefficients, those are the conditions your cubic must satisfy

#

you can guess $p(x)=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d$ then plug in all those condititions to get a system of (linear) equations in the unknowns $a,b,c,d$

sharp urchinBOT
#

Omegabet_

opaque wraith
#

catThink or you could interpolate

#

pick your poison

brazen glen
#

i pick system of equation,dont know how to interpolate yet

sonic hollow
#

yeah, the system is just a 'standard' computation, or you throw it to a computer

opaque wraith
#

,w interpolate

opaque wraith
#

@sonic hollow yk how it work?

sonic hollow
#

I assume you mean Lagrange interpolation, but it just obeys a formula

brazen glen
#

so just to confirm so i dont mess up,the conditions for blue graph are:
P(-5)=0
P(0)=2
P(5)=6

? or am i missing some?

sonic hollow
brazen glen
#

ah ok my bad

opaque wraith
sonic hollow
#

nope

steep leaf
#

if p(4) = 3, then p'(0) =/= 0
i would just go with p(-5) = 0, p(0) = 2, p(5) = 4, and its an odd function except for being moved up

brazen glen
#

so i made the calculations and came up with these results,inserted them into functions and still dont get the same graph at all.this is starting to look like a sadistic troll exercise

#

this is the og function i am looking for the blue one..

grand creek
brazen glen
#

.5

#

-5

grand creek
#

Right, sorry.

#

Corrected.

#

So, have you found it?

brazen glen
#

doing calcs

#

will be done soon

grand creek
#

Alright.

brazen glen
#

found it,its 2/125 x^3 +2

#

i mean the whole function

muted patioBOT
grand creek
#

And now you can find the equation of the inverse red function, too, if you need that.

brazen glen
#

yeah i will tomorow im tired spend whole day on this example