#did I interpret this statement correctly?
13 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
No
Are they saying any subset of Q will have a supremum in R?
it's saying Q is a subfield of R, and R obeys the LUB property: If S is contained in R and is bounded above, then S has a least upper bound
Oh
Yeah that makes sense
I thought the subfield Q has a supremum
no