#Question 3d, why is the answer no value, when similar question have answers?

41 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)

thorny storm
#

3d's answer is no value but 3f and 3g have answers that look like this, {x:x<= -2/3} U {x: x >=3/2} ???

drowsy hatchBOT
#
  1. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  2. Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
  1. Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
  2. Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  3. If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
cloud heron
#

"x = 4" is an equation, but not a set.
"{x | x = 4} = {4}". "{4}" is a set (with one single element known as "singleton")

thorny storm
#

I still don't get it? ๐Ÿ˜•

cloud heron
thorny storm
#

@cloud heron thanks btw

vivid heartBOT
#

@thorny storm has given 1 rep to @cloud heron

cloud heron
# thorny storm <@701077747887243354> thanks btw

u r welcome
it's true that no value from the set of real numbers โ„ can satisfy the system in question (3d), so the set of solutions is a set with no elements. This is known as the "empty set" in math.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empty_set

In mathematics, the empty set is the unique set having no elements; its size or cardinality (count of elements in a set) is zero. Some axiomatic set theories ensure that the empty set exists by including an axiom of empty set, while in other theories, its existence can be deduced. Many possible properties of sets are vacuously true for the empty...

#

the question is asking for the set of solution in set notation, but the model answer isn't in set notation.
that's why i'm commenting on that

#

the answer for (3e) is also not well-written cuz nowadays, when we write a set in the set-builder notation, we'll use a pair of curly braces {...} to wrap it up.

thorny storm
#

Oh rightt that makes sense but at the same time, I've never heard of the o with a slash symbol. And the e question, you're right it defo needs the { } curly brackets. Why is it empty set and not {x:x<7} U {x: x >8}?

cloud heron
#

image source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332453167/figure/fig1/AS:748486492450816@1555464494152/A-Venn-diagram-of-unions-and-intersections-for-two-sets-A-and-B-and-their-complements.png

#

"a โˆˆ {x : x < 7} U {x : x > 8}" means "a < 7 or a > 8"

#

but in case of simultaneous equations, each condition (represented by an equality/inequality in a line) has to be satisfied, so it should be the intersection of the all sets that correspond to the conditions

#

the given system

#

,,\begin{cases} f_1(x) &\le c_1 \ f_2(x) &\le c_2 \end{cases}

dusk bayBOT
#

vin100

cloud heron
#

is actually a set union

#

,,{x \mid f_1(x) \le c_1} \cap {x \mid f_2(x) \le c_2 }

dusk bayBOT
#

vin100

cloud heron
#

the statement "x < 7 AND x > 8" is false, so no values of x can satisfy this statement.

thorny storm
#

@deep arch

deep arch
thorny storm
deep arch
#

And that's officially the end of my patience, sorry. Should've spent less time asking permission and more time asking your questions.

thorny storm
cloud heron
thorny storm
vivid heartBOT
#

@thorny storm has given 1 rep to @cloud heron

deep arch
#

Seriously, read the context. It's not hard, I replied directly to it.

thorny storm
#

Anyways, thank you to both! @cloud heron @deep arch

vivid heartBOT
#

@thorny storm has given 1 rep to @deep arch @cloud heron

thorny storm
#

+close