#finding the inverse of a 3x3 matrix
40 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
A matrix is invertible if and only if the determinat is not 0
The determinat can easily be computed: 1 * det( 1 9 | 0 1 ) = 1 - 0 = 1
So it is invertible
I forgot the rest 
ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜lmfao
To find A^-1 you can use Gaussian operations to reduce your matrice to the identity matrice
Then do the same operations on the identity matrice
You’ll get it’s inverse
Like if AX=I here X=A^-1 then P * A *X=P thus X=P with P the matrice representing the product of all Gaussian operations matrices
That or find the comatrix of A transpose it and you’ll get the inverse, this is an orthogonal matrice so it’s inverse is the transpose of the comatrix
What are the Gaussian operations?
Hmm well here you want to reduce your matrice to the identity matrice
So take the last line and subtract it 9 time too the second line
And add the last line once to the first line
You’re matrice will be then [1,4,0;0,1,0;0,0,1]
Last step is too subtract the second line 4 times to the first line
When you do that your matrice is reduced to the identity
Now to get the inverse you need to repeat these exact operations on the identity matrice
I Hope this isn’t too confusing
isnt it easier to do if u use the normal formula where A^-1 = adjoint(A)/|A|
since the determinant of the matrix is 1, simply find the adjoint of A
Idk for me just applying the operations 3 times is faster
Btw does comatrix and adjoint matrix represent the same thing?
ive never heard of a comatrix
probably i dont know about that method, i just do it by finding the adjoint
It’s the transpose of the cofactor matrice right ?
yes
Okaaay in my country we refer to it as comatrix
ahh
if its a 2x2, adjoint is prob faster
Okay yes that’s what I’m supposed to do
I was so confused by thisðŸ˜ðŸ˜ okay yea that makes sense
Thank you guys sm