#Help needed! Propositional Logic and Rules of Inference question, Discrete Structures.

11 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

molten harbor
#

Question is Prove the conclusion. I attached my own working and the 5 statements + conclusion is the question.
Are the bolded parts (6, 7) legal moves? I have a feeling its wrong and I just want it to be simpler than it is. If I am wrong, feel free to explain why cause I've been stuck for a while.

oak cloudBOT
#
  1. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  2. Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
  1. Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
  2. Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  3. If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
dire matrix
#

No that's legal. $J \land C$ is more restrictive than $J$. That means if you prove for $J$, you prove for $J \land C$.

mystic shaleBOT
dire matrix
#

In a more formal way, $(J \land C) \Rightarrow JKS$ \
$\equiv \neg J \lor \neg C \lor JKS$ \
And \
$J \Rightarrow JKS$ \
$\equiv \neg J \lor JKS$

mystic shaleBOT
dire matrix
#

And you have $\neg J \lor JKS \Rightarrow \neg J \lor \neg C \lor JKS$

mystic shaleBOT
molten harbor
austere walrusBOT
#

@molten harbor has given 1 rep to @dire matrix