#Math team test
9 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
the radius of the sphere, r, is half the side length of the large cube, and also the distance from the centre of the small cube to one of its vertices
would the problem be equivalent to a problem where we consider a circle that is inscribed in a square and circumscribes about another square?
i think it should be it isn't equivalent, but it is helpful to think of the two-dimensional analogue as a simpler problem
if we think of the problem in terms of a circle between squares, rather than a sphere between cubes, and then rotate the bigger square by a quarter-degree rotation, then we should recover the remark by @restive garnet
toe
in the three dimensional analogue, the line "r" is still half the edge of the larger cube. It is also half the diagonal of the cube -- but that diagonal is not the diagonal along the surface of one of the faces of the cube (which is equivalent to the line of length 2r in the two-dimensional analogue), it is instead a diagonal through the body of the cube.