#2 questions in 2 pictures
320 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Anyone who solves these doubts for me , will be called sir by me for the rest of my life
I am only pinging cause akki gave me permission , @polar flare here
Please say yes if you agree
So that it remains as a proof.
I agree to this
Now , the above 2 pictures contain 2 doubts seperately
1 is algebra and another one is my own kinda theorem thingy calc + inequality
The proof one seems right, I suck at proof part tho
It seems correct ?
Can i solve inequalities that way ?
And regarding the algebra one ?
Yup
Unless
The function is a piecewise function
Yeah , then its a pain
Yee
Algebra one now
How did you reach 2^n + 4 ?
Doesn't integral solution mean all x values where y is an integer ?
Its was like a torn out process of thinking cause what regularly happened is that denominator would have a factor which would not cancel out as numerator only contains 2s mainly , thus i thought that maybe i can make the denominator be 2^n
All integral values of x for which y is an integer
That worked splendidly as i found 4 solutions
But then i found out there are 2 more which i couldnt find
Denominator 2^n
numerator 2^{n+3} + 2^5
What
Wait imma try out some values brb
I multiplied 8 inside
One thing to notice is that x is 2^n+4
So what happens is
8*(2^(n)+4)/(2^(n))
You can apply n is the above equation
Yee I m simplifying that that
In this
Okay
n =2,3,4,5 works
I tried 6,7 but it didnt work
So i stopped
Idk where the other 2 are
Is there any other way we can keep it integer ?
Wait there is
We just need to keep
2^{n}+4 an integer
While keeping this one too
So for an n where it cancels numerator ?
Yup
After this our numerator will be odd
But denominator will always be even ?
Denominator
Yup
Hmmmm
Ohh when will it be odd ?
When x is odd
Denominator in this
Ot in original one
When we take n >5
original one
It will be 2^-{n-5}
denominator wont be odd if you are using my approach
Ahh that won't work we need some other way
This is that approach 😂
I made my approach specifically so that denominator always stays even
I m still using your approach
Then denominator cant be odd
Numerator is 8x so we will need it to be even 
finding an approach is so hard in this question
See , thats why i kept denominator even
We work backwards ?
You mean x = y something ?
You gotta bruteforce then
Yup
Then there are 2 independent values
And then we try to make them not dependant , like find a logic in between
And 10000 possibilities if we limit x and y between 0 and 100
I would try my best to not bruteforce
Hmm brute force ain't that good of an idea after all
I am kinda shaking in my boots
I already found those
Cuz they cancel each other
Wait wtf
20*8/16
how 2 ?
Oh ye it's negative
Are you giving the values of x ?
Hi please DM me if you need help
I found that
Please try to help here if you can
as akki and me , both can learn from your techniques cause its kinda hard for us
we both are preparing for exams
Ok x values we have 5,6,8,12,20
I like dealing with individuals based on my expertise. At times I may need just a little tokens. You can DM if you also need help with your exams. Thank you!
5 doesnt work i think
X value ?
You can't charge in a group chat
5 works
X = 5
Cuz denominator 1
What , why not
You can't charge in this server
All free help
Whats charge
Good job Kanny

Ohhh , money for advice
9*8*4/8*4
sorry , no , i prolly have some better places to spend it
We have 6 values, gotta make a connection now
ok
Wait
We did till n=5
How 6 ?
Yeah
Okay
It doesn't follow 2^n +4
x = 24 ?
Yeah , i was thinking that how
We have 6 values tho
Now we need connection
5 = 2⁰+4
6=2¹+4
8=2²+4
12=2³+4
20=2⁴+4
36=2⁵+4
@devout copper you are a genius
5 doesnt work
Your solution was perfect
i dont think even 6 does
Wait , lemme think
They are integers
Why think we have the answer
Your solution was perfect
It was just half done
2^n+4
Wait
How many constraints did we have ?
It has to be greater than -1
Or better
Greater than or equal to 0
Smaller than or equal to 5
Cuz 8+2^{5-n)
We can't have less than 0 cuz 2^n+4
We just had to make 2 inequalities
@devout copper want me to explain ?
We just need to make 2 inequalities
You are brilliant
What the fuuuuuuck
You just didn't see things completely
I am not
Krypton you are the smartest 👍
Nah man
You solved the question ages ago
It is still a coincidence
you did find your approach yourself right ?
Yeah
after finding the approach we just make 2 constraints
Yeah
$x=2^n + 4$ we find that n must be greater than equal to 0
Akki
with $y = 8 + 2^{5-n}$ we find n must be less than equal to 5
Akki
voila your approach was not a coincidence
I didnt understand this tho
ohh
$y = \frac{8(2^n + 4)}{2^n}$
right ?
Akki
Yes
$y = \frac{2^32^n + 2^32^3)}{2^n}$
Akki
just took 8 inside
Yea
$y = \frac{2^{n+3} + 2^{5}}{2^n}$
Akki
now 2^n goes up
Yes
$y = 2^{n+3-n} + 2^{5-n}$
Akki
Okay
$y = 8 + 2^{5-n}$
Akki
now we have this
I was using your approach all along
Fuck man
thats why I said you are a genius
I didnt think my approach had this much potential
from this we know n must be less than or equal to 5
Yeah
now wanna know a little secret 😂
Yeah ?
how did you come up to x = 2^n + 4 tho ?
I still cant believe my ass
smart ass
I wanted 2^n form in my denominator so that 8x in numerator can easily cancel my denominators
i am fucking exhausted
ohh okie go rest
imma interogate your solution till then
5-6 hours self study and 9-3 coaching classes
and me here with full day time pass
All in all 11-12 hours
I will start studying tomorrow 😤
And at the end of the day , this gets me fucked up xD
issoke issoke
glad that i figured it out
it will pay off well
Both preparing for jee?
Yup
I have jee in 2 years
ohh
Nice
whaat
Goodluck
I thought your adv was this year 😂
Fuck , i wanna get into an iit so hard
Nah

11 hours in 10th ☠️
I just passed 10th
Gave board exams like 1 month ago
so you have learnt calc ?
I m barely keeping up with 1 hour
I mean I have my reasons 😤
oo good
I dont know integration
integral too ?
I know limits , differentiation
are you working in same pace in phy and chem too ?
Yup
Also in the question 1, is f'(x) < g'(x) is part of question?
another question
I think its part of solution
Hmmmm
It was part of another question in which i tried to present a general solution to general inequalities using calculus
I see
please do comment on it as you like it
I am open to feedbacks cause i am still learning
I'm just making sure you didn't mean if f(x) < g(x), implies f'(x) < g'(x)
Nope
Alright
Both are required independently
Ok get it
Oo okie
+close
