#Discrete Math Question 1
46 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with: ```diff
+close
Well, if x is the number of relations a given topic has, then 0 <= x <= n - 1, right? Which is the same cardinality as the set of courses. However, it's not possible to have both a course with 0 relations and a course with n - 1 relations at the same time. Prove that, then you have your pigeonholes.
Sure
Go ahead
Why would they all have the same importance?
That's not the claim being made
The claim is that at least 2 have the same importance
Which there are
B and C have the same importance (1) and D and E too (0)
?
D,E 0 no?
Then yeah
Do you want help with the problem? It's not a long solution
Okay
You're most welcome
Well it suffices to notice that if a subject has $n-1$ importance, no subjects have 0 importance, similarly if there exists a subject with 0 importance, no subjects have $n-1$ importance. So you have $n-1$ possible values and $n$ taking on those values, so you can apply pigeonhole easily.
Pyrodynamic
Because if a subject has $n-1$ importance it means it is related to all of the other subjects
Pyrodynamic
Basically what @stable girder said
Yeah of course you apply the pigeonhole
And yes that's what I meant
Yeah just post it and I'll be back in a few minutes
Ok
I'll be gone for a little while like 30-40 minutes
I apologize
The number of interesting words is $\frac{6!}{3!2!} \times \frac{9!}{3!2!}$.\
To have the substring BP, the last letter of the re-ordering of BANANA must be B, and the first letter of the re-ordering of PINEAPPLE must be P. We fix these two and count the number of ways to rearrange the rest i.e. $\frac{5!}{3!2!} \times \frac{8!}{2!2!}$.\
For (c) it's the same idea as before, we treat all 3 possibilities and sum them (Starts with A and does not end with E, starts with A and ends with E, ends with E and does not start with A).
Pyrodynamic
banned from 100+ servers
They don't all have to have the same importance. Two of them have to have the same importance.
I think you should prove why you can't have a topic with importance 0 and a topic with importance n - 1 simultaneously.
It's incomplete.
...yes... the thing I just told you you're missing.
You only proved half of the statement.
Honestly, you're not as rigorous as I would like.
Well, I would prove the statement both ways at once by contradiction. Suppose there exists a course P such that I(P) = n - 1 and a course Q such that I(Q) = 0. Q having an importance of 0 means it's not related to any other course. P having an importance of n - 1 means it's related to every course but one. Since it can't be related to itself, it must be related to every other course. This would mean P is related to Q while Q is not related to P, which is a contradiction, since relatedness is symmetrical.
... what do you think I'm proving?
...no.
Look at what I proved.
Yes.
...probably not.
I don't know.
How should I know?