#limit multivariable calculus
47 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Gaarco
Try seeing if the limit exists
The best trick is to do the limit following lines
Another thing that u can do is to change the coordinates
So just eliminate the 2pi and do the limit when (x,y) go to (0,0)
If two lines give u different answers the limit does not exist
sin a + sin b use the identity and the fact that sin is 2pi peridoic
Been thinking about it and it definitely exists
Do you know the definition of a derivative in multivariable calculus?
Bcs that would help a lot
If not that's also ok
yes i do
great, so a good idea is to right sin(x) as an expansion in (0,0)
u just need the first term really
so u end up with
$\lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)} \frac{x+y+R_1(x,y)+R_2(x,y)}{x+y}$
Arm
now you can separate this expression
and u only have to calculate $\lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)} \frac{R_1(x,y)}{x+y}$
Arm
Mhh, but my limit goes to (pi,pi), how can i use expansions here?
yh, ofc
moreover the correct answer is -1
but since sin(x) is periodic u can simplify the equation
oh yh, bcs sin(x+pi) is negative -sin(x)
mb
but still
the same process
Ok thanks
also, I think u can use the squeeze theorem
but this captures more the idea behind this limit
Doesn't the identity $\lim\limits_{x\to 0}\frac{\sin(x)}{x} = 1$ suffice?
ℝafain
\begin{align*}
&\lim\limits_{(x,y)\to(\pi,\pi)}\frac{\sin(x)+\sin(y)}{x+y-2\pi}\
=&-\lim\limits_{(x,y)\to(\pi,\pi)}\frac{\sin(x-\pi)+\sin(y-\pi)}{x+y-2\pi}\
=&-2\lim\limits_{(x,y)\to(\pi,\pi)}\frac{\sin\left(\frac{x+y-2\pi}{2}\right)\cos\left(\frac{x-y}{2}\right)}{x+y-2\pi}\
=&-\lim\limits_{z\to 0}\frac{\sin(z)}{z}\cdot\lim\limits_{(x,y)\to(\pi,\pi)}\cos\left(\frac{x-y}{2}\right)\
=&-1
\end{align*}
ℝafain
with $z=\frac{x+y-2\pi}{2}$
ℝafain
$sin(a-\pi) = (a-\pi)$ for $a \to \pi$ so
$$\lim_{(x,y) \to (\pi,\pi)} \frac{-sin(x-\pi)-sin(y-\pi)}{x+y-2\pi} =$$
$$\lim_{(x,y)\to(\pi,\pi)} \frac{-(x+y-2\pi)}{x+y-2\pi} = -1$$
Gaarco
Same idea, I basically just avoided writing out the relatively vague first line
Thanks everybody 🙂
yh, that's the idea behind the expansion proof (it's just a bit more rigorous)
we are using that, I just don't like defining the variable 'z'
and doing the limit when z goes to 0