#modular arithmeticcongruency
10 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
why did you calculate the remainder of t^2 modulo 3 for t going from 1 up to 12?
you just need to do that for t = 0, t=1 and t=2
other than this remark, your solution is already complete, you're just not fully understanding why for some reason
you can think like this:
Assume that there is a solution (t, s, u, r) over the integers.
Then t^2 == 2 (mod 3). But that is impossible.
Thus, this proves by contradiction that there is no solution to the equation, over Z.
I forgot 🤣 + it’s a new concept to me so I’m extremely lost
And I realised this after
Oh right cuz t doesn’t hold the equation won’t hold
Thanks
i see, good : )