#Kurogames should change how players can take guilds.

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

weak yoke
#

It doesn’t make sense that they have this function, it’s not fair. I mean come on, the people make the guild with their own items, and then someone can take it from you because you were offline for a week.

At lest make it a month of inactivity from the guild master, only then put the guild up for grabs, Kurogames.
Or you could make it a fighting system,
The person challenges the guild master and the winner takes it.

In my opinion it’s just a bad function altogether, they should get rid of it.
If people have a problem with an inactive guild, they can always leave and join another.

IMG_8614.png IMG_8615.png
sleek vapor
#

It should be a month, (maybe even 2 but i think that would be too much) enough time for the owner to get online at least once

#

But better to not get rid of the funtion, else it could backfire specially for very active guilds, it could end up dead if something happens

#

Now what i want to know is if anyone can impeach the leader, that would be very bad, only vice leaders should be able to do it

restive oracle
#

Why not the more democratic option of a 2/3 vote to remove the guild leader?

sleek vapor
#

But who would vote then, all the guild? Only the vice leaders? And who takes the leader position?.

I only see this working with the vice leaders, maybe all can vote but only if the vice leaders also dissappeared.

restive oracle
#

Could make a secondary vote for the new chief 🤔