#Updating the Neuro-Sama Wikipedia page
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Neuro-sama is an artificial intelligence VTuber and chatbot that livestreams on her creator's Twitch channel "vedal987". Her speech and personality are powered by an artificial intelligence (AI) system which utilizes a large language model, allowing her to communicate with viewers in the stream's chat. She was created by a computer programmer an...
What is the best way to make it more presentable for businesses?
We just need to update it to include all the great things she has done like the hype train some collabs that she has been a part of and also some things she is capable of with her development
To attract business I think it's very important to put neurosama.com as her official website.
Also if someone with more experience with uploading images on Wikipedia could please update the main picture with Neuro's current model that would be fantastic. The requirements for uploading an image to Wikimedia Commons implies that I couldn't upload an image of copyrighted character but Wikipedia says there are sometimes exceptions and I can upload non-free media but I can't figure out how. I have an image that could be used, I just lack the braincells to comfortably upload it myself.
We need permission from vedal to upload the image to the wikipedia page
would the website be neurosama.shop or the website with exploding heatlamp?
Probably .shop? Exploding heatlamp would be funnier, but I don't think it's accurate. Vedal.ai could work too, though there's not much there
should we put both neurosama.shop and vedal.ai?
I'm leaning towards yes, even though the Twitch about page has more than vedal.ai has it might be updated in the future so it should be there
how is this?
Looks good to me
other then the image is there anything else we could do for the wikipedia page/
I'll add Vedal and Anny as creators in the sidebar, then I want to see of we can find more secondary sources as the top bar demands. and maybe swapping the nomination & awards chart to be by year and not ceremony? The last one might be personal preference, I need to look at a few more large VTubers who have won enoug awards for this to be a thing we can make a pattern out of
Maybe go over her abilities more in the development section as well?
the two websites links got deleted
I guess Wikipedia hates you.
they thought it was spam
isnt everything sold out either way
i dont think you can just put shop links like that
True if there isn’t anything on the website why link it
Wikipedia page looks good so far but still need to update the image with her current model
We can’t until we get Vedal’s permission
Ok got it
I brought this up on NN too but I'm wondering if we can use the Dexerto article on the Hype Train as a source for the v3 model https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/ai-powered-twitch-streamer-smashes-twitch-hype-train-world-record-3019551/
Alright. I’m on it!
@undone hedge yo one question can u send the v3 model pic to here as well as i wanna update that to the wiki chinese page as well, thx
How do we take care of this?
May need to do some background editing but here
I can send it to the mods and they can send it to him
I did it!
Ok nice
thx
oh wait how do i upload it hmm
Do I still need to somehow get Vedal to send that email I am
Guessing
Yes
Ok
yea u need or it will be deleted
In 30 days
updated
used the same file as u guys in the english wiki as well
Hey
Yeah?
Vedal is requesting whatever template email he needs to send
he will consider it (but its not guranteed)
ill also direct him to this thread, so he can work with yall (if he wants, i make no promises)
I think it’s just sending the email to the one listed in the image
But it’s probably not that simple
Did you know what the message ment by email generator
I don’t
Well we have a month to work out the image stuff but for now I think the wiki looks great I will ask around to see what other stuff we could add
I'm wondering if they will still allow it with only Vedal's permission
Or if they need Anny's
I don’t think so i think one is enough but we will see
i mean, neuro is vedals property, and the model was something he had paid for professionally and now owns, no?
True
Hm... I'm not too sure honestly, legally speaking
I mean, commissioned artworks are still owned by the artist and not the commissioner, for example.
contractually neuro isnt a commision. Like bussinesswise shes more.
like, an artist of a logo doesnt own it after a business starts using it
"Just because you hire a professional logo designer though does not mean you own the copyright to the design. Whilst the idea itself may be original, unlike the free software, the creator will own all copyright in the design unless they are an employee of your business or the work has been assigned to you in writing."
That's what Google directed me to about that.
And heir I think when Vedal is ready all he would need to do is send the image he is using to the email listed in the image I sent you and say like I give permission for this image to be used in the neuro Sama Wikipedia or something
I wonder if Anny did assign the model to Vedal then
it was likely a verbal contract
verbal contracts are 100% legal
yup
Issue is that I don't know if Wikipedia would accept that
Hopefully, they just accept it without overanalysing it
i mean as stated earlier, neuro herself is vedals intelectual property
he owns all aspects of her (except currently her voice, I think)
neuro is a whole product, a sum of several things
Yeah, of course, that makes sense
But my concern is if Wikipedia is risk adverse enough to refuse it anyway in case of potential repercussions if that's not true
anyways @undone hedge what is the email generator
that button
does it do anything we need to knwo about
Onyx the person who added the image doesn’t know what it does
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates -> there is an email template in this page to declare copyrighted content
Below is an email template for a declaration of consent to use copyright-protected media (images, video clips, sound files, etc.) on any project related to Wikimedia Commons. Copyright holders should send completed templates to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, which serves as the Wikimedia Foundation's central archive for permissions, and the...
So as far as I know heir sent Vedal the necessary stuff to allow permission so now we just wait and see and if it doesn’t work out then we either try a different image or we just go with what was already there for now
not meant to do this, but i can confirm it has been received and is in the Q
Ok thank you
I mean I’ve sent him nothing. Even if I sent him the template I have none of the links that should be inside of the templates
I’ve literally told you that I’m not going to send them anything until you give me something
It even says this at the literal top of the page that you linked
So just to make sure I understand you need a copy of the email template correct
yes, with any of the pertainiant information about the page itself already filled out or provided
Ok got it
can we just make up the BS about 'VedalAI', make vedal the CEO of it, employ anny in there, so her models of neuro and evil are therefore property of VedalAI and vedal as the CEO can give permission to use the images of them officially
||i did not cook here||
That’s probably not the best idea
too complicated for something as simple as sharing images as IP to use on wikipedia
im sure nobody there will actually give a bolt about the legality of vedal giving that permission and not anny
I know that question is if we are wrong it could be a awkward situation
I would say a screenshot of Neuro for identifying purposes in an encyclopedia article is valid fair-use and would not require Vedals permission.
Wikipedia has a policy regarding non-free content https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content, and I would say a screenshot of Neuro meets that.
The previous screenshot of neuro followed that policy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Neurosama_new_model.png
Well then I think we are good we will see if the image disappears after 29 days if it does then something went wrong
I now see that the v3 image on the article was uploaded to Commons, which do NOT allow fair use images. I'll take a screenshot and upload it locally to enwiki
so things are probably fine?
Yes
Thank you
For future reference, the release form on Commons deals with releasing copyright for media works or the work in the media.
The words "media work" should be chosen for cases where the "medium" is also the "work", e.g., a photograph of a sunset or a person, an original digital drawing, diagram, or map, a sound recording of a bird, the text of a web page, etc., but not a photograph of another person's copyrighted painting or a sound recording of a person playing a flute or pronouncing a series of words, for which see below.
The words "work depicted in the media" mean, for example, the case of a digital photograph (the medium) of an artistic sculpture (the work) where the sculptor did not take the photograph but is the individual here making the licensing statement.
Which could mean Neuro's actual model, which I assume Vedal does not want to have a Creative Commons license or be in the public domain
Anyways, I uploaded a new image with the correct things
I still don't get why fair use wasn't used first time round... Anyhow, lacking a lot of details on the dog and evil that could be good for potential business
Also if vedal would like to give us a touch more direction on what he wants expanded on
Wikipedia image permissions are tricky, but yeah, the previous image was uploaded under fair use rules. I was going to upload a new one under the same rules but my Wikipedia account was too new to have permissions to do so at the time.
I do think we should use a different picture for the new model though with a neutral background, ideally in a neutral pose and not taken from a livestream screenshot if possible. Neuro's room in the background is just a little busy. Maybe a screenshot from an Anny stream if she's ever shown the v3 model in the editor would be good. I know it's a pain in the ass after going through the hoops to get the current image accepted though.
I'm not sure if there's a way to even get an image not from a live stream screenshot. I could try and remove the background, or might peruse Anny's vods to see if she ever showed off V3 later today. But then it would still be a live stream screenshot unless she tweeted it or something. And while it might not look like it, smiling is her neutral pose. I waited until Vedal did a restart and that's her pose before she starts moving around. Once she moves she's too bouncy to get a good full body screenshot.
V3's debut has an almost neutral background, it's mostly just pure pink but there is some white at the top. The tricky part is just finding a frame where Neuro is looking straight ahead. Seems odd that we don't have a nice full body image of the model on a transparent background -- I assume we did for v2, at least based off the old image that was up
Just want to point out neuro has 790k subs now.
We could also, ya know ask for one with a plain background?
The left number should be accurate
yup, that's why 790k follower statement was inaccurate. I was asking about wikipedia page follower count being updated monthly to specify just in case.
Oh i didnt realize a project thread got created.
I talked about this earlier when Vedal asked for it to be updated but her current Wikipedia article reads like a fan made it and was just thinking of what cool events they need to add. I don't think a lot of collabs should be mentioned unless they're really notable (like what's the reason the doug geoguessr stream is mentioned over any other collab?). I think only really notable events (osu bot debut, vtuber debut, first collab, subathons and hype train records, LIFE release, twitch follower milestones, etc ) should be mentioned, otherwise it reads like someone trying to advertise or promote Neuro which isn't what Wikipedia is for.
Also the updates to the external links got rolled back
referencing this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#Minimize_the_number_of_links
Wikipedia articles may include external links, links to web pages outside Wikipedia. External links normally should not be placed in the body of an article. All external links must conform to certain formatting restrictions.
Some acceptable external links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that...
but i think we should treat her wiki page like any other streamers where the first bit is a general explanation and then the in detail history section only mentions notable events
I tend to do it monthly if the change is big enough since the last update, but other people are free to update it whenever
also totally missed this project getting made
John Wikipedia joined in
This is one of the reasons Vedal not making his own social media posts is making references difficult, and as to why LIFE has 0 references under Neuro's discography. We can't use self-published 3rd parties as verfiable sources, so the people that helped produce her song can't be cited; it has to come from Vedal himself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources
In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means that people are able to check that information comes from a reliable source. Its content is determined by published information rather than editors' beliefs, experiences, or previously unpublished ideas or information. Even if you are sure something is true, it must have been previously published in ...
She looks WAY too emotionless in this image
Please can we use another image? This one wouldn’t look good at all, there’s one from a dexerto article that’s much better that she could use. She just looks lifeless in this.
Well post the image and someone will update it
And it’s about the same as the last one
Here, found it.
It's not the best but it's definitely better than the other one.
The other one lacks any emotion whatsoever.
No offense but I get similar vibes with this one
The other is one is just a static rigid pose without any animation, this at least shows some emotion.
I could get a better image but it would have to be approved by Vedal.
I'm also against this specific image, its too goofy. but I do agree the current one is lacking... something. i won't say its emotionless tho
If this could be approved by Vedal it would be perfect.
It's 100% emotionless. It's literally what she looks like when she has no animation, in the middle of her being reset. It's static and lifeless.
I'll have to get an approval from Vedal next time he's active.
Hey sorry to disturb you but we have a better picture to use for Neuros Wikipedia would you mind changing it when you have the time

I got it this time
Ok thank you
I've also DM'd Heir the wikicommons copyright email for Vedal should we need it
Her image has been updated
Ok the guy I pinged had a way to use the image without that permission
But good that it’s changed now
idk how the first guy did it either, I only picked the wiki up after her page was first made
Permission shouldn't be too hard to get.
Just got to catch him at the right time.
Vedal just needs to send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. I've already pre-gen'd the email for him
again should we need it, idk right now as we already have examples of not needing to do this step
Would they not accept a discord message?
Hmm.
We already tried that
no
Ah alright.
wikimedia has strict copyright rules. the email is already written, Vedal just needs to send it if necessary
Okay and this image will be used?
This one I mean. Sorry, hard to reply to multiple posts.
Yes
yeah no thats not gonna fly. none of us are the owners of Neuro's likeness, and yeah the image has been used
Alright, perfect. I think that's a good image for her honestly.
That's why Vedal will be sending the email.
well we have it on deck should we need it
Wait you're the same person who posted this
I'm confused what you're referring to.
Anyways it seems everything is good lol.
Vedal just needs to do his part.
I believe the way this was done last time was that it was uploaded as non-free content on Wikipedia directly, and not posted through Wikimedia.
Ill just forward my comment last time
And regarding Commons: "For future reference, the release form on Commons deals with releasing copyright for media works or the work in the media.
The words "media work" should be chosen for cases where the "medium" is also the "work", e.g., a photograph of a sunset or a person, an original digital drawing, diagram, or map, a sound recording of a bird, the text of a web page, etc., but not a photograph of another person's copyrighted painting or a sound recording of a person playing a flute or pronouncing a series of words, for which see below.
The words "work depicted in the media" mean, for example, the case of a digital photograph (the medium) of an artistic sculpture (the work) where the sculptor did not take the photograph but is the individual here making the licensing statement.
Which could mean Neuro's actual model, which I assume Vedal does not want to have a Creative Commons license or be in the public domain"
hmm we could just go with that then
In that email it says "the work in the media" which is NEURO
NOT the image
he would making neuros model free for anyone to use
if the wiki needed permission from every copyright owner to use an image of them, their logos, etc. there would be severely less images
idk if it means that, the wording is unclear tbh
The words "work depicted in the media" mean, for example, the case of a digital photograph (the medium) of an artistic sculpture (the work) where the sculptor did not take the photograph but is the individual here making the licensing statement.
The "work": the art made by Anny i.e the model of neuro
The "media/medium": the image itself.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file
anyway I would prefer Vedal not do something he can't take back, which he won't be able to do if he sends that email
ok then I will upload the new image directly, so we won't have to go through wikimedia
you won't have to upload an new image, just upload a new version of the existing file
@fervent cobalt Vedal does not need to send anything (and he probably shouldn't)
ill let him know
i could probably ping him
eh ill do it in the staff channel
done hes aware
and with that my job here is done
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neuro-samaV3.png was uploaded to Commons, you should edit the image and put {{speedydelete|G7}} at the top so it can be removed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Neuro-sama_V3.png at this one, you can press "upload a new version of this file" to update it with the new one
@nova lava ah you need to use {{SD|G7}} to get the CSD code to show up, my bad
its been done, thanks 👍
you should replace the source parameter on the local file to wherever you got the updated image from, so its correct
well i don't know where its from exactly, hang on. @prime vessel which stream did you get that image from
Oh shit I'll check.
Couldn't find it, but here's an image from 4/29/2025.
I could try to find a higher res image if you need.
This might be higher quality idk
I can find more images though.
uh ok, I'll just grab the just chatting stream the 29th. I'll just assume thats when you took it.
Yeah
Hold on I got it
i doubt anyone is going to frame by frame the VOD looking for the exact pose
Wait nvm
Yeah true
Yeah it was this stream. 
Maybe not show the wikipedia people this one though because they might try and track me down to ask more questions about the Neuro picture and they might be able to tell who I am based on the number of bits.
was it ever stated what exactly Vedal wanted updated??
No
So next time I see him
I will ask him to look it over and give suggestions on this thread
initially some stuff was outdated
Which was changed
👍 I've been super busy recently so glad more people are contributing either way
Can someone revert back to the previous revision?
