#Are shorts hurting long-form content?

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

orchid vale
#

people who exclusively watch shorts and people who watch long videos
i dunno if the youtube audience can be divided up like that

#

isn’t the first time this phenomenon happened
:intrigued:

coarse lance
orchid vale
#

i see, so the neurosama channel gets (effectively/de facto) allocated, say, 10 recommendation spots
and by having shorts, neurosama uses up all those spots on shorts, not its long-form videos

coarse lance
shut lava
#

That wont hurt long form content

#

What deos tho is clip farming

#

And attention span shortening

#

Like look at a lot of vtubers, theyll do stuff thats obviously just farming clip nbecause thats by far the best way for discoverability

#

Or a mr beast video, there arent anh calm quiet moments anymore its just constant adhd content

#

(Adhd content is what id call something likea filian stream or mr beast video where theres a lot of stuff haooening and its all quite fast)

coarse lance
coarse lance
#

Forgot to mention most of the content has vedal in it when he only shows up like twice a week

coarse lance
#

if you look at the slay the princess video and the videos posted after the shorts did decently in the algorithm you can see a sizeable difference

rich flower
#

I would like to point out if it werent for the short I dont think the channel would still have some life in it, if one the approaches is to be chosen it will be the shorts since they are most likely to bring people into the stream

#

there is a reason why we didnt get the part 2 of the StP

coarse lance
#

I feel like shorts aren’t really reflective of most of the content, that being neuro on her own, most of the shorts are with vedal and he shows up like twice a week so it’s kind of misleading and I think people who check out the stream will be disappointed

rich flower
coarse lance
#

I’ve seen a lot of “where’s vedal” in the twitch chat

rich flower
gaunt stag
#

I guess I can see where this is coming from.
Personally, looking back on the way I've use YouTube, I have channels that I've subscribe to purely for the shorts while others I subscribe purely for their videos. Rarely or never have I subscribed to a channel for both forms of content.
As for a solution, I don't know. I'd be fine if it was focused more on shorts, but iirc shorts don't produce any money.

rich flower
#

it is more common to read the "shorts brought me here" in this new chatters wave

coarse lance
coarse lance
rich flower
#

if the point of his youtube channel was to make money (directly) it would be better to just dual stream on it

autumn laurel
#

If they bring separate audiences doesn't seem like an issue tbh, i agree that the shorts are a bit too vedal centered though but i think that has more to do with the fact that chill streams haven't been really clip worthy recently

coarse lance
autumn laurel