make minecraft launch faster

[solar plinth]

yes

[long fable]

well this very well depends on what the cause is, and realistically; there isn't a viable reason that would be caused by restrictions, since this seems to be exclusive to only the bloat clients.

so technically this is possible, but it appears the main cause is likely to be to verify the players client cosmetics even if they own none. or have them completely disabled from being viewed.
another reason that likely seems to be causing this is the way that instance allocation is deligated which isn't very well performance friendly.

[runic canyon]

k

[quick bridge]

Lunar's load times are slower than vanilla minecraft

[muted zinc]

ngl that's very very true.

even though lunar has more things than the vanilla such as mods, fps improvement, options, and much much more things, i do not think it may take that long to open

[rugged plaza]

lunar is always working on improving launch time

0 point for this suggestion

[worthy mural]

Yes I have noticed it has been slower

[frail karma]

pls

[solar plinth]

My frames in lunar is very high but it just launches so slow man it gets annoying

Some client like badlion and feather client launch fast but they just don't feel smooth like lunar

In performance Lunar is the best the launching speed is just the problem

[lime oxide]

for me there is no fps difference when using lunar fabric or normal fabric with the same mods

on 1.7, 1.8 and maybe 1.12 it improves the fps by a lot

[solar plinth]

yes

[odd bone]

Use lunar client, Minecraft launches quite slow but with lunar its faster! Also lunar devs aren't affiliated with mc so they can't change what happens with default mc

[lime oxide]

normal fabric launch time: 10 seconds

lunar fabric: 30-40 seconds

[coarse tundra]

to say its the best is stretching it, solo optifine or sodium easily outstrips it bc of how much bloatware lunar has

maybe better than vanilla in many regards, but even badlion often has better performance than lunar

[weak trellis]

yes this is technically possible, it's just not as easy as you think it is
verifying user cosmetics doesn't have anything to do with launch times and it's handled post-launch

[sullen quail]

just probably get better ram

[muted zinc]

this is not only about ram bro

it's about cpu not ram

[cursive parcel]

It is ram cpu and disk mostly ssd

If you have ssd Disk it is going to load much quicker then hdd

So Not really cpu and ram mostly the disk

[muted zinc]

cpu is also important, but the disk is more important

[cursive parcel]

yea true

[long fable]

tbf though even NVMe SSD are still significantly slow loading for Lunar Launcher Games, anything else though is a joke to load.
Average Minecraft Launcher game launch time would be average 1-3 seconds.
Average Lunar Client Launcher game with Same Mods loaded would be average 1-3 minutes.
nearly 60x slower if not more.

and I can assure you its not a hardware limitation.
This is on a 12th Gen i7 Processor
with 64gb RAM (x4 16GB RAM DDR5s - both sets of 16 are setup for Duel Channel 32s)
NMVe SSD (2TB, not that it really matters, and before you question its less then 10% used)

I am well aware the RAM is beyond nessessary for this particular PC but it was originally being setup for something else initially, but never ended up happening, but yes there are plans to eventually used 2 of those RAM sticks elsewhere since its litterally unnessessary.

[cursive parcel]

bro got maxed out desktop 🤣

[cursive parcel]

and i never said hardware limitation i agree it is kinda bad loading times but it is do able it is not the end of the world hehe

like gta V 💀

[long fable]

I wouldn't even say its maxed out 😂 there is definately much better available.
but yeah I get it, but still would have to say GTA V is also pretty unoptimized, and shouldn't nessessarily be deemed acceptable imo 😂

[cursive parcel]

yea 🤣 still suprises me that gta V is peer to peer 🤣 and no dedicated servers no wonder 90% of the players are hackers

[cursive parcel]

pretty good tho what gpu?

[long fable]

Its pretty disappointing when you look into why its exactly happening. 😛

my GPU is only a 2060 RTX

[cursive parcel]

dont you have a bottleneck then?

[long fable]

could definately be improved with my CPU/GPU tbh

[cursive parcel]

cpu is 12th gen that is pretty good right?

[long fable]

yeah but 14th gen i9s exsist 😂

[cursive parcel]

🤣 i need to upgrade too 😭 3060 ti ryzen 7 5000 series

16 gb ram

everything is too expensive 😭 specially nowadays

[long fable]

I plan to eventually upgrade to 3090 just luckily haven't run into a game I cannot run max graphics yet.

yeah its the main reason I haven't upgraded my GPU just yet.

luckily I haven't been limited on any game I've ever played as of yet.

[cursive parcel]

i should wait

if i was you 5000 series are going to come out so everything is going to be cheaper then

then is the 30 series 2 gens behind 😭 XD

[long fable]

honestly yeah, I'll still prob stay looking towards the 3090 after the 5000 series comes out.
main reason being is absolutely no game even really needs 4000 series yet 😂

hell the fact I can run ray tracing with a 2060 still kinda suprized me.

[cursive parcel]

🤣 im just future proofing 💀

[long fable]

legit same 😂

well working on it

[cursive parcel]

wait how you can only do that with 30 series right?

[long fable]

nope 😛 2060 RTX handled it just fine

[cursive parcel]

😮

[long fable]

the highest its ran to was 66%

[cursive parcel]

oh yeah it is true searched it up

[long fable]

which imo is a bit high for my liking but yee it handled it perfectly fine, it averages out around 30s-40%

[cursive parcel]

which games do you play XD

[long fable]

lmfaoo ALOT, take your pick 😛

[cursive parcel]

hmmmmm idk what to choose now hehe

[long fable]

DM me

[cursive parcel]

let me search up a new triple a title 💀

[long fable]

so we dont get too much off topic on this chat

[cursive parcel]

https://youtube.com/shorts/-dQJUNEwfZ4?si=0TRA9IIZ424r53Fq

this prob launches lunar quick 💀

[meager arch]

yes

[trim lagoon]

i watch that guy