Hello, i have a photo and used the Gaussian Blur filter but the upper edge of my photo got transparent. (Left and right didnt because the original photo was wider to the left and right) Is there a way to apply the Gaussian blur in a way to not make the outlines transparent? or can i somehow make all transparent pixels 100%?
Tank you
#Remove transparent pixels after Gaussian Blur
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
You could:
- Content aware fill
- just select and expand this upper part of the image since theres no detail here anyway
- Duplicate the layer like 8 times until its opaque
- Just paint over it in that same blue with a soft brush
there are probably plenty of others ways to fix this too
yes i thought of this way but i do a lot of bluring with startrails as an example and there is a lot of detail so content aware fill is not possible. i tried it...
is there no other way?
like restricting the filter for only using pixels in linke a mask or only use pixels not transparent area?
Like in this example. i wanted to path blur the startrails but not the tower. i replaced the tower with ai generated startrails and blured it but the generated sky wasnt accurate enough and you can see it now 🙁 is there a way to restrict a filter to only use pixels linke in a mask but not others outside a mask or something
It's a common issue with blur, it just blurs within the boundary of the canvas, meaning that it just ends up with semi transparent edges
One way to easily avoid that would be to increase the canvas size by than equal amount of pixels of your blur settings,
Blur, and then crop again to the original size.
Provided that your images are all the same size, this is something that could be easily automated, either through actions, or through a scrpt, if Javascript is your thing