why are you putting a wing FC into a quad frame?
#matek f405 wte mounting problem
calm pendant
jaunty grove
There isn't even a standard rear mount pattern on this frame. Just looking at pictures, no, there will not be enough room in the back for you to fit the flight controller you've purchased.
You'll find there are a lot of things not carried by local shops. That doesn't mean you should purchase whatever they happen have
narrow patio
bruuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhh
jaunty grove
I don't know how to say this more plainly
There is not enough space
The FC you have is 44mm x 29mm
The space in the back of your frame is like, half that
narrow patio
clear gale
U do know if it sticks out it will snap in half on a hard landing
Return it
And buy parts meant for a quad
jaunty grove
If you do not attach the flight controller to the frame rigidly--and I mean with stack screws--you will end up with a quad that does not fly correctly due to faulty gyro data. At best, it will be sloppy to control, and at worst it will be completely uncontrollable
I cannot stress enough just how much this flight controller is not going to work for you
You bought 25" wheels for a car that takes 19" wheels. It doesn't matter how expensive they are or aren't or how easy they were to get
And even if you do mount this thing and even if you do get it in the air, @clear gale is correct. There is a very high chance this flight controller gets easily destroyed in a crash because it's sticking out and exposed. PDBs are not designed for impact forces
clear gale
Pcbs are hella easy to break lmfao
jaunty grove
Inav's filtering is not nearly as good as betaflight's. And it isn't rigid enough to prevent oscillation in the sub-100Hz range, which is where actual movement happens
Meaning you can't filter out junk without filtering out actual input
jaunty grove
When the FC is not rigidly attached to the frame, the momentum of the FC itself will lag behind the movement of the quad. The softness of the tape you use to mount it will also dampen the natural oscillations that will happen between the FC and the frame, lowering their frequency significantly to the point that they are mixed in with the actual movement of the frame.
By rigidly attaching the FC to the frame, you eliminate the momentum lag, so the gyro sees the frame movement in real time. Any vibration is kept at its original high frequency and can be much more easily filtered out
Now you may ask yourself, "If all of that is true, why do proper FC stacks have gummies between them and the screws?" and that's a fair question. For starters, a normal quad FC has a weight of a few grams at most. The WTE stack you have has a weight of at least 22g. So with a normal FC, there is a lot less mass to throw around on the gummies. Second, and more importantly, the gummies are squished in place and fixed onto the stacks screws. Yes there is a little movement allowed because they are flexible, but it's generally just enough to filter out high frequency vibrations that were damn-near impossible to eliminate when the FC is bolted straight to the stack screws. With that said, the gummies aren't always required IMO, I have a couple builds that fly really well without them
jaunty grove
Smh
You do you man
I'm going to guess hot glue isn't going to stick to carbon fiber. Even if it does... it's fuckin' hot glue
Like, what?
ashen crater
maybe you can 3d print an adapter to a standard quad mounting layout
im pretty sure that the bolts holding the pbs together are m2
idk how you will fit it though
narrow patio
you are a melon