#dnd-lore
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
obviously magitek starship, like in Spelljammer or whatever the hell it was called
No it was a regular space craft using standard thermonuclear power generation. There’s a cargo cult of subterranean folk who are guided by the disembodied mind of a nuclear physicist who is fulfilling his dying moments to repair the failing nuclear core, but now as an Immortal (god)
It also changed the axial tilt of the planet, dropping everyone into a nuclear winter which changed the migratory patterns of most of the animals on the planet
I love the known world 🙂
(Mystara is the future, long, long after the apocalypse, but yeah, basically.)
12.4 million, at least.
thx
Oh?
I thought that guy was the Dr. Manhattan of CERN researchers, not the Dr. Manhattan of thermonuclear rocketry. 🤔
And the apocalypse(s) caused all the mutations that resulted in now stable species of elves, dwarves, etc.
Are you sure? The continent structure is correct for earth in the past
It is okay. Seek truth in your heart, and Rafael will guide you.
(Elves are. Identical to Shanara, actual elves; everyone else are mutations, per my last delve into it)
(Oh noooo, another excuse to reread everything ooooh noooo)
I'm pretty sure the Gazetteer lore says after an apocalypse(s) in a world like ours.
I could check but do you know which gazetteer?
The Africa and SouthAm collision is also a southern hemisphere mass separated from NorthAm and the the Eurasian separation.
… probably the dark elves one but who knows honestly, I know we got some more of the nuclear winter stuff in Dwarfhome and I know it wasn’t until later it was implied Alfheim is so lush and green because they ruined the weather of the desert place (making it a desert)
The one I most vividly remember it in is ||one of the elf Gazetteers describing a migration from the separating SouthAm into NorthAm (where most of the lands covered by the Gazettteers are.||
I’m finding references to everything being “BC”, but there’s nothing saying what the letter refer to, and it I think the core of things is the kingdom / civilization of Blackmoor rose to super technology in the distant past of Mystara but whether Blackmoor was present/future or very, very distant past isn’t made clear.
BC in the Mystara context is Before Cataclysm.
That’s what I assumed, but isn’t the cataclysm the whole ship explosion thing?
I’m seeing a lot of modern Mystaran cultures listed as having histories pre-cataclysm and that doesn’t sound right, but not up for going through them all again. They’re very fever dream if you run through them cover to cover in sequence
Wait no,
The temple of the frog was about future tech folks already
That and/or the LHC exploding (before we knew what an LHC was or came up with new anxieties about it exploding.)
I think that was one of the retcons from Known World to Mystara
So the trouble I’m having is that 0 BC seems to be during the war between Thyatis and Alphatia? Which… sounds familiar, especially since the Beagle was a later introduction RL chronologically, but… oy. Yeah this will require a few weeks, I think, because I can’t trust secondary sources and primary sources are a handful
I need to prep my 4e game I can’t get caught up in the Known World now. D:
Yeah all I can find by searching directly is an unsourced
The continents of Mystara resemble those of Earth approximately 135 million years ago.
Oh, my bad. BC is Before Crowning of the first Emperor of Thyatis. 🤦♀️
I mean I would believe it changed. The gameline ran from like 78 to 91 (maybe 94)
That makes things a lot muddier clearer. It makes things "clearer."
The line is full of shifts in continuity. At one point the present Duke Stephen is the third Duke Karameikos, and later he’s the first and they moved the timeline forward to give it colonial and imperialist tensions
Which sucks, a bit. I really want more about the native Traladarans and why they have a random Nosferatu as a Baron?
Some of that is explored in ||B10, Night's Dark Terror||
Wait you mean why they have the nosferatu baron? That’s my bad, that’s actually only a little bit of my interest
I want to know more about them to portray them in the world because they are described as a living and oppressed while occupied culture but all of the descriptions from the Karameikos side read like they were a tribal people who were put displaced and occupied and I could never reconcile that (likely because I have no concept of how one conquers a peer and maintains the illusion of being the good guy)
- adds meek's comments to his 'Meek's Mystara Corner email *
how one conquers a peer and maintains the illusion of being the good guy
Usually by teaching them religion or by providing "humanitarian aid" in the form of investments which secure control of local resources which you can then exploit
Having to educate or aid them doesn’t strike me as peer to peer on the scale of nations, is the thing.
But yeah.
Maybe I’m just at that stage where it doesn’t seem sensible to me
Eberron doesn't consider the origin of species (barring a few that were explicitly created by something else; elves, dragonborn(?), warforged in living memory), with the idea that the various sentient species emerged more or less in their current forms
There is an absolute Time Abyss in the history, but the oldest race we have a non-mythical origin for are the elves, who have kinda since made their whole cultures about their creation.
Everyone else is either "we were created like this (obvious myth)", "Huh, that's a weird thing that might be related", or "i'unno, we've been here"
Cultural origins are more common.
Sure, but if the two parties were actually perfectly equal peers, then no conquest would've been possible in the first place, the fight would've come to a standstill. War is expensive, losing a war doubly so. Infrastructure and lives are destroyed, and it takes a lot of money, time and labor to rebuild roads, farms, mines, homes, defensive fortifications and other military infrastructure, etc.
The conquering party coming in and saying "Awww you poor babies, let us help you rebuild your hospitals and roads, all you have to do is take out a very large loan from us" is a pretty tried and true strategy for keeping a beaten party down.
Having to educate or aid them
I'd also say "having to" isn't quite right. You don't have to do anything about rebuilding or healing the places you conquer. But, if you don't you've just spent your war budget on...sending a few thousand people on a walking/horseback (and light arson) tour of a few neighboring cities . If you don't come home with new territory, access to new resources, valuable loot, or a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape then you're just throwing money and lives into a black hole. It's a strategic choice.
One could also ask the genuine question: "does one wage wars against one's peers?" Can you actually consider someone a living, breathing sentient person on the same level of cosmological and ethical importance as you, and also say "We are going to take away your lives and your homes"? Who defines the peer tier list, ya know?
Excuse me, i dont seem to find the homebrew discussion channel
Can someone ping me?
If you ever can't find a channel I'd recommend looking through #channel-guide and #880965682462875679.
Disagree. In D&D terms being equal means “both sides have a +11”, the winds of fortune ever blow.
yo how did blink dogs win against displacer beasts ? arent displacer beasts much stronger ?
Pack hunters vs solitary and blinking /displacement value differences
Action economy. Displacer beasts tend to rove only as individuals. Blink dogs run in packs.
And if you go back to the 1e stuff, every single Good aligned creature in the world united in one massive army to wage war on everything Evil, and a lot of the shape of the world — shared languages, the fact that barely surviving civilizations all exist underground where they fear to tread into the light of the overworld, ancient enmity between species — all come down to this primordial assault that only fell apart when some forces of good wanted to chase everyone down into their hiding spaces and murder them to a one, and some forces of good went “whoa, homie, no. That’s genocide, that’s not something you can do and keep a Capital G good on your alignment sheet”
It never made sense that displacer beasts didn't also have bite and claw attacks...
They’re likely built like cheetahs instead of tigers
I think they're explicitly six legged panthers, right?
Yep
but it could be their tentacles are just significantly more potent than claws or teeth, and carry less risk for use
I don’t know! I don’t think so, but they’ve had various shifts in various places
A friend of mine found reference to being able to tame a displacer beast but only if their tentacles were removed when a kitten, which I can’t very often but would be an interesting like, maybe the tentacles are actually symbiotically attached and influence their personalities?
ultimately they'd hit far above their weight class if they had claw and bite attacks in addition to the tentacle attacks and displacement effect
5E explicitly has them as six-legged great cats, yeah
And they’re associated with panthers on at least one domain of dread
1e: vaguely puma-like, blue-black with dead black tentacles.
2e: a magical creature that resembles a puma with two black tentacles on it’s back.
3e: <my monster manual is missing> (.0) / looks like an emancipated panther with blue-black fur (.5)
4e: no description, just art in MM1
5e: a sleek great cat with blue-black fur
Sorry for the delay. My easy access 4e books are in folders from when everyone would xerox their books, and trying to gently remove the bottom folder caused a bookshelf colapse 
Puma is the genus of great cat that includes panther, though I like the idea of having a like, Lynx of Mountain Lion displacer beast.
Cheetahs are the sole member of their genus. Seems like a niche to fill with monsters, to me
How big are koblod eggs
Pretty sure they had bite in 3.xe.
Cannot check. Displacer beasts are not OGL content xD
You are correct (I just checked the 3.5E MM)
I think the 2e planescape stuff had them never use their claws as like, a prestige thing
So, I have a group of enemies in my game that are psionic spies and assassins. Part of me thought it'd be interesting to have them as some cult of evil Kalashtar, but with everything I'm reading it seem like there's no precedent for Kalashtar being evil?
Then time to add to the Kslashtar story in your game…
There is an equivalent to the kalashtar that are evil, but I think what makes them, kslashtar instead of the other thing is specifically that they are not the evil faction. There is an equivalent, psychic human type person who is like, grown to not have a soul to make them much easier to possess by psychic nightmare monsters.
It looks like the name of them is called be inspired.
It also looks like the. Kalashtar were made in the same fashion by the Quori so I could see just using them as they are
Hm. I don't think that's exactly what I'm looking for
So one reason I want to do this is that the PC (1 on 1 game) is an abandoned Kalashtar himself. He doesn't even know he isn't just human. I thought evil Kalashtar telling him what he is would be interesting
Kalashtar are those bonded with rogue, good quori spirits and their evil counterparts are the inspired, those who volunteer or are deceived into becoming vessels for the regular, evil quori
That's not to say a kalashtar themselves can't be evil, they're not controlled by their quori spirit, it's a union
if you've seen Doom Patrol, Kalashtar are like a more subtle Negative Man - there's a spirit they're bonded with but as the player you control the entire being.
and instead of weird radiation powers and bandages you look like a human but have some mild psychic powers 😄
How do Changlings reproduce
no idea, it's not been mentioned
it is weird how often "how do these things get it on" is a question in here tho
being shapeshifters, can they just reproduce asexually?
unspecified
I mean physically I see no reason they can't
Changeling have children via shapeshifting and having a child normally in the way that whatever the respective race does. They are born looking like whatever that race is, but they eventually they revert to their "natural" form and are a changeling.
In Eberron at least
Okay thank you
I'm making a Changling character and needed to know if they had 1 or two parents
to clarify a bit, they can have children in their base form as well. and when they have a child while in a different form, the child could be that of the race or be a changeling, you wouldn't know till they transform
https://keith-baker.com/faq-changelings/
theres 2 questions on the topic
What happens if 2 Changlings take a races form and have a kid
Are they definitely a Changling
probably
Can Changlings control taste
Of...?
Themselves
No, they shift shape not molecular composition
I'm not intimately familiar with the lore, but just being reasonable ,you'd have to assume that a changeling would have to at least be an incredibly high level monk to reach Bene Gesserit level control over their shifting
or similarly empowered
There is a feat in exploring eberron that gives significantly more control
There’s also one feat and one spell, which make you taste terrible, and have an adverse effect on enemies which bite you
When a changeling (or a doppleganger for that matter) have a kid, their shifted appearance doesnt affect the kid. Theyre either whatever their other parent was or theyre a shapeshifter as well
i have a question
Tiamat was the ruler of avernus in 1e, after that Bel was added as ruler of avernus.
In adnd Zariel > Bel
As a reward, Bel was given command of all the
armies of Avernus and became the right hand of Zariel,
the original Lord of Avemus.
in 3e Bel > Zariel
Bel rose through the ranks from a quivering, mindless lemure
to full pit fi end status. He led the diabolical armies against
the demons and, through a combination of guile and power,
smeared himself over and over in bloody glory. At long last,
he was elevated by Asmodeus to Lord of the First, displacing
an archduke called Zariel.
in 5e Zariel > Bel
The archduchess Zariel rules Avernus, supplanting
her rival, Bel, who has fallen out of Asmodeus's favor
and is forced to serve as Zariel's advisor
Talking about Tiamat, she is in 5e
Tiamat, the Queen of Evil Dragons, is a prisoner on this layer,
ruling her own domain but confined to the Nine Hells
by Asmodeus in accordance with some ancient contract
(the terms of which are known only to Tiamat and the
Lords of the Nine).
So as i can see zariel and bel just fighting each other all the time? And tiamat at that moment just sitting doing her own things? I cant find a place of tiamat in that conflict. Seems like she just dont care at all, but thats weird
Hm, tiamat in 3e
Bel has recently made inroads into forging
an alliance with Tiamat, who maintains a
domain on his layer.
Bel is a begrudging servant to Zariel. They take any opportunity to lampoon her since it adds to her chance of demotion and Bel's return.
Tiamat however is pretty much just on her own yeah.
i see
If Zariel gave Bel an order theyd have to oblige, but otherwise Bel wants to throw Zariel under the bus.
Tiamat seems bound to hell as punishment for something and the text seems to be inconsistent across the years as to whether hell is where she lives, and belongs, or hell is where she’s stuck, and just making the best of things
If she wasn't bound to hell she'd be out raising all kinds of chaos
raising all kinds of chaos
Where?
as far as i know the goal of tiamat is to make her bad things in material plane. But gods cant enter it by default. So, does that bounding means, she cant enter it with avatar as well? If no then that bounding makes no sense at all
Material plane I assume. Most dragons lay around there after all.
Her Avatar can go to the material
But since she herself is bound the avatar must be summoned from the inside
So every tiamat summoning rituals ar all about summoning aspect avatar?
Usually a god's aspect/avatar arrives in the Material plane (why take the risk and/or use up divine energy to deal with mortals?)
but...
Great blade (all five daggers): The blade
using a ceremony delineated in
Pyrra’s diary from Ochir Naal’s own notes,
slice open a gate to the Outer Plane of
Baator and allow Tiamat, the Queen of the
Chromatic Dragons, to enter the Prime
Material.
(Blades of Ochir Naal)
No idea what "Blades of Ochir Naal" is.
old item (1995)
also i am pretty sure i saw mention of it in 5e somewhere
Not actually as an item but as key for ceremony
The Time of Troubles/Godswar/Avatar Crisis introduced avatar as a game mechanic. The statblocks for the gods in 1E AD&D Deities & Demigods were rather weak. Infamously Lolth in AD&D had 66 hp...
oh yea that makes sense
She can’t leave hell. She can’t go to any other plane of her own volition, she must be summoned or broken out of jail.
There’s no prohibition stopping gods from walking the earth, exactly, they just tend not to do so openly. In the forgotten realms Ao would stop it, on Oerth gods walked around but in disguise all the time. In the known world gods either don’t exist or have much better things to do
This looks a lot like “plot device to open the prohibition” so I don’t know what you mean by this
What happened so she become trapped?
i saw, like, a million statements that cleary said she can travel almost anywhere she wants. So i guess something have to happend to jail her, but i dont remember any metions of that
Ochir Naal seems to be a historic figure, names but never presented
I don’t know. I believe it had something to do with the dawn wars when good banished evil from the surface of the world in the assumed setting of advanced dungeons and dragons
But she’s been stuck in hell since 1979 so I dunno
Often the old books would out a god in hell or place a hero’s tomb in a dungeon or give. Demon a grudge and not say why. It was up to a given DM to make up a reason for their world. Much like an onion hanging from the belt, that was the style at the time.
Asmodeus bound Tiamat to Avernus to help guard it.
That seems unlikely given asmodeus wasn’t the big ol deific mastermind at the time that he later became
so I don’t know what you mean by this
we were talking about tiamat entering material plane. As books about gods says, gods cant enter material plane. So i showed that item as example. Cuz it seems it allows to summon a god, not just an avatar
But one never knows
Which book about gods says they cannot enter the material plane?
It’s also worth noting like, if a god cannot enter the prime material in the first place, as a general rule, then someone making daggers that allow that, would be a specific bypass designed to get around that rule so it’s an example of an exception that proves the rule, I think
Faiths & Avatars page 17
Lesser Powers...
... They are unable to enter the Prime Material Plan
By Eric L Boyd? That might be the hang up. That’s forgotten realms second edition specific, versus Tiamat being stuck in hell being generic (it’s in the 1e monster manual, kinda; she’s not described as stuck directly).
I don’t think Deities & Demigods (3e) constrains gods to stay out of the material at all, and I think 4th edition didn’t either but it made them inscrutable and gave them more important things to do, with Tiamat perhaps still trapped out and Asmodeus now trapped in hell
Design: Julia Martin with Eric L. Boyd
Additional Design: Ed Greenwood, L. Richard Baker, and David Wise
5E Monster Manual (page 68)
She also holds a special enmity for Asmodeus, who long ago stripped her of the rule of Avernus and who continues to curb the Dragon Queen’s power.
5E DMG (page 10)
Tiamat, the Queen of Evil Dragons, is a prisoner on this layer, ruling her own domain but confined to the Nine Hells by Asmodeus in accordance with some ancient contract (the terms of which are known only to Tiamat and the Lords of the Nine).
That’s nifty but still leaves a lot of unanswered questions, primarily because she’s in hell in 1e and this explanation came along almost forty five years later
Well, WotC ignored everything pre-2014, so....
1983
The uppermost plane of the Nine Hells
is ruled by Tiamat, the Chromatic
Dragon
She used to be LE and an archdevil but now she's CE and a lesser deity.
Aha! So I’m not the only one who remembers that, it’s not a Mandela thingy
its indeed not
I always thought Tiamat and Takhisis were different alignment, but when I last checked, they had the same?
Well, she's been a lesser deity for a few editions. The CE retconn was in 5E.
I don’t think she was an archdevil though, I don’t think she participated in hell’s hierarchy at all
And, dang. I could have sworn she used to be LE and Takhisis was CE, or maybe the reverse?
And now that they’re literally the same entity we’ll never figure it out without older sources
as crawford said
Tiamat's invasions of worlds in the multiverse keep failing. She's cranky (CE = Cranky Evil).

Tiamat was referred to an archdevil in 1E but she never bothered with the politics of Hell.
Was she? Now that I can check
But also I vaguely recall we had this conversation last server
Not much different than Lolth being referred to as a demon lord despite also being a god.
1992
Ecology: Tiamat is capable of eating anything. On Avernus
she requires no sustenance, drawing her energy from the
plane itself. However, when she travels to other worlds and
planes she feasts upon creatures she defeats, molten objects,
and the very ground.
The fact that she’s comfortable on hell and literally eating dirt anywhere else is very interesting
xD
I mean she doesnt PREFER dirt
If we did go over this before, I can’t find it. Might be in Epic 
Right. In one place she’s fine and elsewhere she must suffer the non-godly indignity of having to eat enough to sustain her massive bulk and power
That strikes me as in the same vein as being bound to hell, y’know?
Not like she struggles procuring corpses, however
She opens her mouth and boom, 30 people charred to her liking.
True
1980
TIAMAT, The Chromatic Dragon, Queen of Evil Dragonkind,
Arch Devil
Dragon Magazine #38
exactly
This ain’t very helpful, there’s no way to verify if it’s an actual quote
“Leomund's Tiny Hut: Rearranging and Redefining the Mighty Dragon”. In Jake Jaquet ed. Dragon #38 (TSR, Inc.), p. 41.
She was an archdevil though, 100% positive on it
oh yea, i need to add month too my bad
No I was looking for book title actuality. Like I have my 1e monster manual under my arm as I type this
The brown and yellow dragons are introduced in that article.
The dragon magazine is neat though and I will accept it’s just a blind spot and I’m wrong 🙂
I forgot her tail has a stinger, I think that’s a callback to the primordial LBB thing where purple wyrms were just dragons grown so large they couldn’t fly or even walk
how dare you! D:
MM 1e, p 32: Tiamat is Lawful Evil, "Tiamat rules the first plane of the Nine Hells where she spawns all of evil dragonkind."
She is not overtly described as either a devil or a goddess.
Speaking of legless dragons, I wish they would bring back the Lindworms
Phew, my number scale is off. She has 128 hit points and that feels too low but
It was later splatbooks they made her more powerful (a goddess and archdevil).
128 hp is very low. Lolth had 66 hp.
She was set to be banished back to hell if struck by enough damage and had regeneration that would restore lost body and mind, so I can see the godhood angle.
She's only encountered outside of her lair 10% of the time
I don’t think it is very low; you’re looking at a max of like 30 with the best magic gear and max stats on a two handed greatsword.
The best part of 2e is that it has almost unlimited amount of creatures to play and fight
And if she is encountered out of her lair, she'll have 5 huge, adult male dragon consort/guards around her, all of which have spellcasting abilities
paper dragons the best thing i saw so far
HA!
but occasionally she comes to earth to place a new dragon
… wow, okay yeah I take that back. She has 128 hit points but it looks like you’re supposed to cut off her heads first, because damage to the body directly just… merks her. 48 damage to body and she dies. 
I feel like we’re walking the lines of lore and legacy here let me know if I stray too far
she is also a
Gargantuan fiend.
in 5e avernus adventure
Also if somebody will ever need a good description of tiamat, the best i saw is in polyhedron 73. Thats just sounds amazing
Tiamat appeared briefly in a Brazilian tv car commercial that featured the kids from the 80s D&D cartoon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msDp_k-Fid4
oh thats nice
A point being missed is my use of past tense; the value of a lore channel is noting where differences lie. What changed in the last five years doesn’t necessarily define the first forty.
She’s a fiend in tyranny of dragons as well, though she’s just a dragon (with ten divine ranks) in third edition and fourth is… weird. S
I forgot how they did everything in 4e, wild
oh no
u reminded me
the komodo dragon tiamat art from 4e
x_x
also interesting fact
One of the dnd devs has art of tiamat somewhere on the wall
and tiamat has yellow head on that image
rhexx in his video about tiamat said that she can have head of any colour of her choise. But yet i never saw such statement in any books
in 4e adventure one of the arts of tiamat has classic set of colours but in other order, not with the red at the middle.
i lied, that was DragonMagazine272 page 33
its 9 am my head stops working correctly
I believe it.
Careful with lore videos though. Someone mentioned that Tiamat is the real world Babylonian god come through a portal and while neat. I haven’t been able to find any mention of that every being true in FR
july 1978 dragon magazine 016
TIAMAT(B) or LOTAN(C) — The Primeval Mother or Dragon
Tiamat is the “salt water” that gave birth to the other Babylonian
gods. Lotan is the Primeval serpent. Both appear as a seven-headed
Dragon and both represent the forces of Chaos.
Here's a PBS video on the Mesopotamian mythology's Tiamat, the mother of monsters:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RG6XbNKViIQ
This does not say “Tiamat came into the forgotten realms from earth’s babylon”, and dragon magazine is, especially in the early days, not “official” content. One of the earliest issues has Satan and Lucifer in hell, for example, but we know that Asmodeus is in hell and neither Satan nor Lucifer are.
Satan is canonical to DND, and Im tired of pretending hes not
listen, for the last time his name is Mearls and we aren't supposed to talk about staff that way.
(I AM KIDDING)
lucifer etc was in 1e right? cause 2e just had asmodeus... IIRC
I dont remember exactly when satan appeared
But he was archduke of avernus, only to be swiftly deleted from existence because of...yknow.
i know Bel as the leader on avernus (well, Tiamat is the most powerful on avernus but from the archdevils Bel was the leader there)
Satan got buried HARD.
No, 1e has asmodeus up front.
Satan and Lucifer and alternate takes on more biblical devils show up in an early the dragon, and I think get redone in dragon magazine annual #1
Asmodeus was the head of the Devils in 1e as well
We had the CD set of all dragon mags up to a given point too
And… I don’t think BECMI has a hell? It has demons, but only as immortals level enemies. It focused on the weird space astral/ethereal/elemental and that was it
Tiamat is the most powerful on avernus
well technically not
cuz tiamat is a lesser god
and at the same time god of kobolds exist in avernus as well
and he is one lvl above her
thats what i can tell judging by ranks
also his statblock in 3e looks a bit better than tiamat
but i never played 3e so i might be wrong
Yeah, but Tiamat is surrounded by big dragons, while Kurtulmak is surrounded by kobolds.
tiamat also surrounded by kobolds to be fair
...dressed up as dragons...
Which source are you using?
it was somewhere in 3e cant say now
Wasn't Kurtulmak imprisoned in Acheron?
Oh wait, Draukari is on Avernus. Interesting.
It wasn't in Acheron, it's a lake called the 'Shadow Sea' a bit of the ways off from where the Netheril empire was
Deities and Demigods
Kurtulmak is the go to example for how the rules in that book violate a lot of lore, the example back on GITP being how despite being some sort of turbo mastermind, Asmodeus cannot win a fight against Kurtulmak (who they took to calling special K).
I try to point out that "Asmodeus is in a ifst fight with something" means he's already lost the real battle, but no one listens.
The issue there is unlike 2e (and I assume 1e) there's no breakdown like intermediate gods have 50% immunity to lesser and greater have 75% vs lesser etc. So what really makes a bigger difference are which salient divine powers the god has and any other special God powers. I have to look as well. My players were able to manage with a rank 10 without any of the crazy powers (ie. Alter reality, the insta kill one, etc). It was tough of course. Hardest thing they ever faced but a rank 7 with 'better powers would be much more difficult.
3e dieties and demigods I assume? Or faiths and pantheons
Ya tiamat has ..iirc, 3 of each main chromatic type. Not sure if they are more powerful than normal dragons. Abishai, some other devils ..and if you use other lore, she could call upon one of her children to help. Mordukhavar the Reaver would be a tough addition to a battle along with its army of dragons and devils. Like have fun with tiamat...
Yeah. Like… a deity with the magic domain is ridiculous because they can straight up invent brand new 17th level spells on the fly and slap you with them??
Imagine like, “Wee Jas gives you a dirty look and casts enhanced maximized traumatic brain hemorrhage roll a fortitude save”
Hehe
The 3e Deities and Demigods? Then yes. The 1e version, they are both lesser gods. 2e introduces the intermediate category (I guess because everyone complained about being locked out of 7th level spells) and rather haphazardly promotes various deities.
I sort of miss that, the ability of only a select a few deities being able to give you higher than six level spells? That is amazing for worldbuilding, and immediately sets up why the default assumption of a cleric has to Chriscilla ties. Once a deity stops being a minor deity, you get better power overall.
I’m not sure how I’m saying proselytize wrong. Oh there it goes.
Glad they just have Lesser and Greater again
None of the main D&D settings justify fictional fauna and whatnot via evolution, right?
D&D is very creationist...
Remind me, are owlbears and whatnot not normal animals?
FR
There is a spell directly called "Evolve" from 2e, so read into that how you will.
Most of the playable races were created by their creator gods
Okay, so they’re decidedly not related
Why do you ask...?
Well, let’s just say I took a college-level anthropology class this semester and now am examining this whole idea of multiple humankin races perhaps way harder than necessary 
Ah. I can shut down any potential questions you may have with one statement.
Half-Ettin Half-Green Dragon.
This is a thing that exists.
Do not ask questions, you will only hate yourself for it.
Ettin?
Two headed giant.
Let that sink in.
I mean, Dragonborns are a thing
Aah, I for whatever reason thought they were human/dragon hybrids
Not exactly a wrong guess.
The rough idea is that dragonborn were made as servants by Asgorath (Dragon god of creation) for the first dragons, residing in the parallel dimension to Toril known as Abeir. After a chunk of Abeir got warped back to Toril, that's where the dragonborn emerged into our world.
The hybrids of dragons and other beings are called half-dragons since well...half dragon.
Mystara and Forgotten realms do. Greyhawk might. Eberron definitey would.
Yeah as gross as the concept can be, the eugenics spells in 2e were some of my favorites. Really dig into that evil sorcerer praxis
Mystara and FR do justify?
Mystara has actual evolution in some places and the reason it’s static as long as it is is immortal meddling, and forgotten realms is old enough that there’s supposed to be examples of evolutionary change between like, netheril and playable time
...I didn't even really mean it in like a eugenics way, I just meant by the fact that there's a spell that is effectively magical FEV from fallout
There are SOME mentions of evolution regarding Forgotten Realms though
Humanity for example was made by gods, but still had to evolve from unga bunga cavemen
General idea though is that most things in DND got added by the gods, but then had to grow from there
Yeye, like a root race
and then the five humanities in Theosophy
That type of thing, yeah.
Or modified by mad science wizards
This is where I'd point to any monstrosity.
Aah, this specifically https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_race
Where r these spells in 2e . Sound cool
I found them in the encyclopedia mágica, I don’t know where else they would be. Necromancy spells though, I think third through seventh level
Maybe necromancy be banned in my world. The Dark Arts
@white ravine You think arcane magic would outright be unable to heal?
There are some in Dark Sun, ones that will even "purify" your form.
They are perfectly serviceable as stats for a player wanting to play a half-dragon, so your idea isn't too farfetched.
(And that's only an optional thing DMG brings up.)
Is there any lore justification as to why wizards and sorcerers don't get healing spells like Cure Wounds?
Sorcerers do, or at least they can in 3e. So it goes back to the old days when clerics were armored support casters/second-line warriors limited to 7th level spells vs magic-users with their massive magical effects (once they crossed the power inversion point with fighters).
Wizards still have the biggest spell list lel
Is it often assumed nowadays clerics or their equivalent being the more squishy kind?
It’s not listed as optional, it’s just a side bar
Nope. 3e expanding clerical power to 9th level makes them one of the hardest classes in the game. It's interesting that 5e took heavy armor proficiency from them as a default while adding more blatantly offensive spells to their list.
Hardest?
It's not used anywhere except the sidebar in DMG. Deities in PHB and SCAG are just described as deities; they aren't ranked.
Stronk, powerful, etc. Being able to combine 5e's clerical magic and class features with full armor and good weapons is very strong.
They are as they are as a legacy of 3e unifying the XP/level chart, as are the expansion of clerical magic/full casting and general discussions about whether classes are balanced.
thank you. i am aware
not really? the thing with a game. is the designers put whatever limits they want. there's no rule of the universe written somewhere 1000s of years ago that games in the future, only clerics must have healing spells, etc. that said, in 2e there were some special healing spells for wizards. the ones i know where named spells - created by specific high level casters. they arent as efficient as cleric healing , but its something. they may have been updated into 3.xe as well.
Rough idea of why it cant is because arcane magic and divine magic are separate. Divine magic are 'gifts' of sorts. Healing, protection, food and water, etc. Arcane magic is very coded and formulaic magic, so it can't do things like fix wounds.
Healing is a very 'divine' thing in nature, arcane casters cant make things like souls for example. They can mimic it with things like simulacrums, but never true life.
Remind me what that is again?
Oh right. Yeah they both fit.
I can see for arcane magic just fine, with power being how many spells one can force onto their mind
but how would it go for divine magic?
Divine magic still relies on the spell format, but I imagine its a lot more malleable than arcane magic. You are effectively asking for 'favors' from your god after all, so it can be bent around in ways.
but at the end of the day its some mystical enregy in the universe. no real reason u cant manipulate it to heal just as you do to destroy. its game design
Mmm, so more of a mana system?
One can assume? I'd base it more on the fact that a bank wouldnt loan half of its stored cash to someone random
The more important you are to the bank (god), the more power you can draw
that'd make more sense
like Cleric level
Clerics have a certain calling that grants their power iirc
The most straightforward way I can imagine the fact that arcane casters cant heal is that the gods are able to channel positive energy through their divine caster in order to heal.
Wizards and the like cant exactly tap into positive energy as easy. It's why there are only TWO spells that arcane casters can use that can heal.
Or negative
One being vampiric touch (draining the life out of someone, literally) and the other being life transference (draining the life out of yourself for someone else)
Neither of them heals without taking from something else
That falls apart when considering 3e's delineation of arcane and divine magics (which may still be operative in 5e). Bards can heal and bards are arcane casters. And in 3e, sorcerers can possibly add bard spells to their repertoire.
^
Way I interpret that is the fact bards may be arcane-based but aren't directly manipulating the weave as much as wizards. They draw on more latent force to pull magic, which could let them access healing magic where wizards cant
Same reason why divine sorcerers can use healing magic but most others cant
Bards in AD&D used the druid spell list after all
Mhm. And druids are divine
QED
que?
I'm not talking about divine sorcerers, I'm talking about 3e sorcerers learning bard spells.
But only in 1e. In every other version of D&D they are some version of arcane.
Reminder: the present fifth edition system is still Vancian, and while not direct from the books the major defining form is not the one-and-done but the use of enumerated slots which are expended.
For clarity, most folks have taken to deferring to the one-slot-one-cast specifics by using bullet metaphors. If you’re ant to cast two fireballs you need to load two fireballs into your magazine
Sorcerers in third edition were great; they weren’t necessarily limited to adding arcane spells to their roster, they were capable of observing and studying any magical spell enough to take it on level up. It was wild.
okay, question. if the living soul inhabits its own dead body, it's not technically a zombie... what do you call it? (besides undead)
A revenant of sorts?
Yeye, sorcerers essentially can tie their knots of mana at will
just trying to think how divine spellcasters have the number of spells prepared, or rather how many knots of mana they have tied for them, and how the power scaling would function for them. Stepping outside the game mechanics ofc
Mana is a bad representation and I feel that exposure to video game mana systems is actually getting in the way of understanding how the game tries to describe things
There are no knots of mana; casters one FR do not use their own energy to cast a spell as a first level spell is enough to generally kill a human in the effort.
The Weave, mb
[Forgotten Realms]
Per the various books on it, magic is a background energy primarily channeled through the weave, a structure created by magic herself to facilitate use and control instead of chaos and disruption; all spellcasters have what is known as “the spark”, which is an innate quality that allows them to actually practice magic.
Magic is known as The Art and is practiced through a complex series of study and exercise of wills as well as various sciences. A wizard develops the ability to prepare and store spells as forms taken with effort into themselves which interact with the weave; as metaphor it would be “you take a shaped pipe out of your pocket and plug it in, to get a specific effect”.
Priests still need to study and understand the arcane but they get assistance through divine power; it is unclear if they get assistance to replace the Spark or if they get assistance with having spell-forms put into their heads for use. It varies by edition and sometimes story.
Sorcery is new enough no one has, to my knowledge, bothered to explain how a sorcerer works and how they’re different. Fourth edition hd sorcerers, I believe, as having a second soul in their body which provided the magic; it’s possible that the reason they get only specific spells and cannot change them is because of the same mechanism that allows an Angel to hallow or a unicorn to teleport or a displacer beast to displace
Okay, when you mention the Spark, you're basically saying that it's required to cast even the most basic of spells.
Yes.
damn
The dungeons and dragons rules do not specify this for you; but Lore-wise most people CANNOT EVER cast spells or do magic.
The game is quiet about this because any character can multiclass into a casting class or take a magic feat. That just means those characters had the spark all along.
A warlock often makes deals to get magic despite this, I think? But it’s unclear. In my reading, I have not found anything on warlocks or sorcerers. But I have not checked very closely.
That makes sense. Kinda like being Force-sensitive in Star Wars or having Magic Circuits in the Nasuverse
Wait wait wait wait wait
From what you said regarding priests, which in this context would encompass clerics, druids, paladins, and rangers, it probably would circumvent whether one has the Spark or not. From my interpretation, their deity (cleric and paladin) or the nature spirits they commune with (druid and ranger) would probably be taking the spells they would need for their journey or the given day and imparting them in the recipient's mind. They're being lent this otherworldly power, but they don't own it.
No I believe you cannot be a priest without already having the spark. But it might be edition dependent.
Getting magic when you have NO talent would likely be a pact. It’s also possible the spark is variable; there may be folks who can only handle being a Half caster and not a full caster?
good point, outside game balance justification lel
But isn't divine magic kinda like a pact anyway?
Quick check; arcane magic is The Art and divine magic is The Power, now, so I may be remembering wrong or there may be changes that never came up in our games. 🙂
and no. Divine magic is not at all like a pact. That’s a common misunderstanding but the warlock pact is one-and-done. Technically.
Yeah. Personally, I think that anyone can learn arcane magic and it's through years of dedication and preparing spells and then casting them that it expands one's own capacity for spells. And this is outside game mechanic BS, but more experienced magi and wizards be able to 1) handle more powerful spells without them backfiring, and 2) hold more of these prepared, essentially half-cast, spells imparted on their brain without it being overloaded and reduced to gray sludge.
Just fyi, I'm taking this idea from reading Jack Vance's short story anthology Tales of the Dying Earth, which is where Vancian magic comes from in its organic, de-gamified form.
I found a Greenwood thing on it. Seems to indicate you’re right, and clerics can gain casting without predilection.
I think drawing too much inspiration from original sources is folly though. Most of the Vancian stuff was removed before the game was even printed.
Note that Ed Greenwood is not an authority anymore and hasn’t been for decades.
Of course. I'm thinking for my own worldbuilding anyway, and it not be a tabletop RPG. An actual OEL manga (I just need to find an artist to pair up with)
Lore is a bad place for that imo, this is for asking what is, not what you’d like and how to do it. 🙂
Absolutely fair. Vancian magic as a game mechanic is a royal pain in the ass, arcane and divine caster alike. And yeah, we can move it to #non-dnd-topics if you so wish.
If you're working on a comic you should take inspiration but don't be deadlocked into the Vancian magic system. Make up your own stuff since you're not bound by game mechanics for a visual medium. TTRPG and comics are two different beasts that don't translate 1:1 either direction.
No, they are limited to arcane spells. It's just that bard is an arcane caster and opens up what the definition of arcane spells is.
Of course! I’m just thinking it’d be cool to use the Vancian magic system and I guess take its implications into account like Vance does
Right, so you’d think by that logic that bards and wizards could cast spells from each others’ lists, right?
If it wasn't a special for sorcerers, sure.
?
In 3e, using spells from another class's spell list is a special ability unique to sorcerers.
Incorrect.
These new spells can be common spells chosen from the sorcerer/wizard spell list, or they can be unusual spells that the sorcerer has gained some understanding of by study.
Only sorcerer has this exception.
Yeah, let’s take sorcerers out of the equation for this; would healing spells still be better as for divine casters only?
It is possible to read that specifically as learning unusual spells that are still arcane; it is equally possible to read that as not having that specificity.
I believe the fact that it is not specified means toward the latter, myself. 🙂
And the expansion of that in the spellcasting chapter effectively limits those to bard spells as it states they must be arcane spells.
@gray heath
Asking about whether or not this should continue seems more like a regular D&D discussion or a homebrew discussion, versus what the legacy justification for it is?
Mechanically, it doesn't matter with the power boost casters in general, and clerics and druids specifically, have since 2000. Lore reasons are lore reasons.
Okay, so wizards and bards be able to have their spell lists clumped together from the sound of that
I think(?)
This is more of a game rules than lore question?
either/or
Well, lore =/= rules because each edition changes/tweaks the rules and lore.
Lore then
Which edition? 1E bards cast druidic spells...
1e being the outlier to 0e, 2e, 3e, 5e, and maybe 4e, so context is pretty clear that's not what's being discussed here.
If we are dealing in generalities, it is probably best to stick to fifth edition
1E Bards used druid spells
2E Bards used wizard spell list and Int
3E Bards used their own spell list and Cha
4E Bards had their own powers
5E Bards used their own spell list and Cha
(correct me if I'm wrong on these)
Looks right to me
Is there any cool things about astrology that is connected to dnd
And 0e bards (published in TSR and very close design-wise to 2e bards) also use wizard spells.
I am playing a star/life druid and got the mechanics down pact, it more of a lore questions
I thought dragonlance had something before about schools of magic and the gods constellations in the sky at the time
What's the Spelljammer monster that's essentially a constellation?
What's your setting?
Constellates r cute. Messing with astronomers by moving around to mess with the sky
Forgitten realms
do we know where the 5e solar dragons fall among the categories of chromatic, metallic, gem, and netural dragons? and if so which or are they more a misc kind that is so far removed from any other the other kinds?
That is a fabulous question! I will look into that, in the meantime, I am going to regret the loss of the cataclysmic category.
my guess so far is neutral since their typical alignment is listed as simply neutral
Neither. There are many non-metallic/chromatic/gem dragons pre-5E.
basically dragons super charged with elemental energy compared to normal dragons, more elemental energy than a dragon normally is, things like volcanic dragons, earthquake dragons, ect..., basically a degree of this power or elements in general of these are part of the 5e greatwyrm status cuz they basically begin to have more elemental energy than their physical body can contain causing it to kind of leak out
Fourth edition. It separated all dragons into chromatic, metallic, and cataclysmic. The only cataclysmic dragon I recall is the pyroclastic dragon.
Ah ok.. in dragonlance the fiery volcano dragons where the chaos dragons... when Chaos (the god being) returned in Drsgons of summer flame
Sounds coolish I guess 🙂
the forgotten realms wiki has pages for the earthquake and volcano dragons but also has lists of names for other known kinds
I noticed that there are images of good natured people riding Blue Dragons. What is that all about?
Where is this from?
Those images might be from Pathfinder, they have the dragons flipped where the chromatic ones are good aligned and the metalics are evil.
to be fair blues arugably are lawful neutral but just barely qualify as evil, do to a selfish nature typically, that is my guess, else yeah could just be a different franchise where the lore is drastically different
plus i believe pathfinder has different artworks for their averages of those dragons https://i.pinimg.com/originals/95/16/11/951611bfa0ea57549872ba741b49dc86.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/06/40/10/0640108ae40edfa2fcaa44af58422309.jpg the dnd version vs pathfinder version
...Dont they enjoy tricking people stranded in the desert into eating sand?
sounds like a blue dragon thing to due but man do I love their mating dance
Reds are my favorite. It's the literal apocalypse.
hehehe Inferno of the Stars it is your time!!
Question: Does anyone know of any deities in dnd lore, all of them, at have a wolf involvement
Wolves?
Mielikki is known to use wolves to do her work, among other forest critters
However, you could very easily throw together a Dog Lord in the same vein as the Cat Lord, which is the beastland's deity of cats. There's pretty much one 'Lord' for each type of animal, so go wild with that.
I can’t upload the picture for some reason. Also it was using the Dungeons And Dragons design.
I’m pretty sure that the dragon lore for Pathfinder is the same as the dragon lore for Dungeons And Dragons.
Never assume when trademarks and copyrights are involved.
How do I upload pictures in this channel?
No, I read it on the Pathfinder Wiki.
Upload to an image hosting site then post the link here with context
looks like pathfinder's dragons aren't flipped like i thought. Did some checking. I have no lore explanation for any images of good aligned people riding blue dragons unless those dragons were dominated or under an alignment fliping spell, which used to exist but i am not sure if it does any longer
Let's please keep things on D&D
As much as I love Pathfinder far more in both lore and system, the dragon designs for D&D stand out to me way more
Each dragon has a distinctive look, my favorite being gold and silver
Gold makes me sad, I want my 1e MM gold dragons back xD
Yeah, I preferred gold dragons being inspired by Chinese/East Asian dragons (aka long/lung). I hated it when they added odd wings to its long serpentine body in later editions (3E?).
I remember back in AD&D a buddy commented that it was dumb the gold dragons were wingless and I retorted that it wasn't because it was based on Chinese dragon (I'm ethnic Chinese so I grew up on wingless dragons).
That said I hope WotC bring back the long/lung-type (plus other non-Western inspired) dragons .
I think anyone our age range would have been exposed. Lots of US soldiers bringing back jackets from places they invaded or saved with ryu/lung/ryong style dragons embroidered on bomber jackets and other nicknacks
DnD needs to add some Chinese style dragons
Maybe Western for chromatic, Eastern for metallic? I'd also avoid having them be uniform in alignment
Meh.
good chromatic and evil metallic dragons be a thing and all
Just as Journeys through the Radiant Citadel explored the varied cultures and civilizations of the world, perhaps a Monster Manual expansion to include the mythological creatures of the world would be good.
Chinese dragons look nothing like Western dragons. Why reflavour them as metallic dragons? That would be creatively lazy.
Well, that was the AD&D gold dragon. It was changed in 3E.
The 1E AD&D MM2 had Chinese dragons (lung) if my memory serves me correctly.
Kinda interesting debating what in D&D is considered "canon" and "non-canon," especially when a lot of it is a big fantasy kitchen sink in all the cliched glory
whatever works best for your table is "canon"
but as far as the written lore, that'll depend on which setting and which edition
Canon is what you the DM choose to be. Even though I use the Forgotten Realms setting I ignore a lot from the 4E lore (a good chunk was retconned with 5E, so that helped)
It's AL where they're real picky about how canon, especially considering how railroaded those campaigns tend to be
Most of the AL adventures take place in the Forgotten Realms and they often coincide with the latest hardcover release
yeye
Let's call it "fickle artists".
I think comics and novels had issue of portraying Gold Dragon as gold colored western dragon despite what lore said about them.
That or "cultural uncanny valley" like a Chinese dragon without Fantasy China (I know Kara-Tur is a thing but not sure if lore stated about their origins from there, but for writer "it just happened to look like one").
Does the Dragonlance do extra damage against draconians, creatures with the dragon type, or just true dragons?
The old 2e books didn't help too much, considering the dragonlance was actually important to the story back then
Fizban's has the updated 5E version. The extra damage is done to Dragon (it doesn't specifically point out Dragon type though).
I told you already.
yusyus long dergs amazing
well at least we have sun derg who is almost noodle
couatls also looks kinda like noodles
Chinese style dragons appeared in the 1e book Fiend Folio, gold dragons looked like Chinese dragons in 1e as well.
yea
WoTC's official statement is that there is no canon other than the canon at your table
i think they have whiskers in 5e as an easter egg for that
no longer noodlers but at least have whiskers
I stand corrected.
The capitalized D means dragon type per the Dragons and Dragons sidebar in Fizban’s.
It should be clear throughout this book whether we’re discussing a specific kind of dragon, the members of the three great dragon families, or all creatures with the Dragon type. But if you see the word “dragon” (not capitalized) and you’re not sure, assume we mean chromatic, gem, and metallic dragons.
At least that’s how I understood it
Maybe this link will help. It leads to an image of someone riding a Blue Dragon.
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/a-practical-guide-to-dragon-riding--22377329387202463/
Actually, here is the image itself.
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/9b/f0/b5/9bf0b57c1b4d046bcacbca5824624772--blue-dragon-dragon-art.jpg
Blue dragons being one of the few who maintained their cool factor between 1 and 3 es
Could a Illithid/Mind Flayer God conceivably count lore wise for a GOO-lock Patron?
yes
do all the campaigns like princes of apocalypse and acquisitions incorportated and such all happen in the same world?
Lore-wise many are based in Faerun but at the end of the day the DM can decide what world/setting the adventure takes place.
The books should have a section on incorporating the adventure/campaign into other campaign settings. For example, most of the (classic) adventures in the Ghost of the Saltmarsh anthology were originally set in Greyhawk but the book explains how to incorporate them into Forgotten Realms.
In monster manual 2e it says sahuagin worship great devil-shark. is there more information on it?
Most of the 1E and 2E modules were set in Greyhawk. I think it was in 3E that most modules were set in Forgotten Realms.
Currently I'm DMing a 5E conversion of the 3.5E Savage Tide campaign that was set in Greyhawk but have converted it to Faerun (the Chult peninsula to be exact).
Sekolah, god of sharks
Ah thanks
You can find more info in the 2E Monster Mythology book. (I have a copy of it if you need something specific)
I should be able to find it somewhere, I'm just browsing and that devil-shark caught my eye
The Forgotten Realms wiki has an entry on Sekolah.
I am currently trying to combine the maps from the red hand of doom with the fourth edition Nentir vale Myself
it'd be so funny if a mindflayer gives its own warlock resistance to its damage
whats the deal with orcs tho. Can someone tell me why theyre the only species who gets a NEGATIVE to a stat? (I mean I know why, but whats the lore reason)
because orcs be dumb
i mean I know thats the in-lore stupid reason but they normally take like 12 different loops to get there
They do not. That has been fixed.
Mlouden03 is also factually wrong, orcs are like any other mammal. They can be dumb or totally awesome
I think now kobolds are the only folk with a penalty, and even that might be gone
noo this race isnt a racist concept from a bygone era, its just gods or something blah blah
damn why did they catch a stray lmao
Because for everyone thirty people going “yeah that’s sensible game design and also makes sense verisimilitudinously” there’s one very LOUD person doing a wojak face screaming “nOOOOO”0
i need to google that word
It’s constructed. Verisimilitude is the sense of internal consistency and “realism”
Verisimilitudinously is me being cute in how I say the word as applies to the topic
I learnt a word today
Kobolds got their penalty removed
Then they got every good feature they had killed
dont they get disengage as a bonus action
Didnt they lose pack tactics?
MotM Kobolds don't have Pack Tactics looking at it on DDB
Rhetorical question, because MOTM in its infinite wisdom removed the main thing kobolds are known for from kobolds
I mean theres an argument where pack tactics just gives you a rogue ability that in one dnd comes at 13 th level for rogues
but yeah thats more of a rogue design thing than pack tactics thing
It’s hilarious to me how often people will exclude flanking because “advantage on attacks is so easy to get it’s not really worth making it 100% guaranteed” but then kobolds losing pack tactics and having to do what everyone else does is world shaking
yeah flanking is a surprisingly easy rule that I learned when playing in a pathfinder game
just one guy on opposite sides of one guy
in the multiverse There is no lore, only zuul- i mean balance.
But still, losing pack tactics is a bit of a sting.
no way to go around the guy you wanna flank? Take a page out of pathfinder again and make an acrobatics checks to make a flip over him
but even without that, flanking normally is already super easy
it tends to lead to conga lines and devalues other methods of advantage is the main criticism i see of it
That’s not even a pathfinder thing, that’s been in D&D since 1981 
You can also just jump
It's moreso the fact an entire team having it can be nasty, especially since kobold doesn't really lend itself to anything particularly good to use with that advantage (or at least didnt have anything back in volo's original time)
It didn't have much, but pack tactics made up for it being their main thing
i know but its more or less the only easy way to get flat footed on any rogue so thats where I learnt it
Yeah “advantage is supposed to be special” which runs me the wrong way, since dis/ad was literally supposed to be the new “DM’s best friend” you can slap on anything and everything if appropriate
that's because the thing that benefnits from you advantage tends to be from your class
or feats
bonus action disengage is cracked on any class tbh
also just make enemies use flanking as well
Correct, but kobold doesn't really have anything that makes any particular class benefit extremely well off it.
well, yeah? most races don't
-2 to strength and small size means no bigger weapons, rogue already gets sneak for being in flanking, etc.
they don't have -2 str
also though, as usual crossbow expert + sharpshooter exists
but yes I do agree with your general sentiment that races need actually cool features to stand out
They don’t have -2 to strength anymore? Their impact is now based on capacity to carry
Not anymore, and then they shredded pack tactics off.
-2 for pack tactics, I agree
It's what ORC SHOULD HAVE BEEN.
Still mad about that
they got rid of -2
disagree
opposite I mean
while still having pack tactics
now kobolds can also play strength based classes without taking a penalty
I mean yeah, would suck if you lost pack tactics and kept the -2.
But that's part of the balance of it
they still can't use large weapons effectively
Stronger feature, slight detriment
oh yeah theres that as well
and that's where the best melee damage is at
Anyway. Kobolds being Draconic offshoots makes the lack of pack tactics and strength penalty sensible enough I’m heavy
but isnt there a benefit to being small?
Lore wise? No, not especially
thats not much of a benefit at all lol
Squeezing can be a massive advantage if your DM lets you capitalize. Why do you think every heist movie has some scene regarding vents?
Just use Kob-old stat block for the dog faced ruffians of yesteryear and the newer, svelte Draconic kobolds get the new stats.
I got a whole other stat block for the old kobolds
you can ride mounts in medium spaces
which basically means a default speed of 80ft
until it dies anyways
Having watched a real human man ride a normal hyena, I think the “must be larger than you” is silly
This is the lore channel, my loves. How the rules work should go to general or rules chat 🙂
Its more so you dont cause shenanigans like a very much too big ogre riding a regular horse or the infamous centaur wheel
Hey everyone! So I’m starting to want to learn more about the history and lore of D&D. Where’s a good or decent place to start?
Were right here
Its really...a lot. Its easier to start at a specific point and kind of expand from there.
Well, I’m looking for books and such.
Ah. SCAG, (Sword coast adventurers guide) Volos guide to monsters, and Mordenkainens tome of foes are my recommendations
A lot of the lore is baked into older editions though, but the 5e books i listed there will get you a good overview
After that you can read the Drizzit books. I believe the stories are non-canonical, but it does go into some of the lore, and they're just fun.
Ok, I have a bunch of those lol
History of the hobby or lore of a given setting?
Setting
What RAW feats exist that are best flavor for a Mind Flayer custom Lineage? In terms of being accurate.
GOO-lock so telepathy already taken care of
You probably want #1045166392174972938
So the halflings of Athas started the apocalypse, turning the Blue Sun green (and rendering Athas an Earth-like rather than an Ocean World)...
Rajaat, the First Sorcerer, sought to return the world back to the Blue Age by removing all the impure races (aka everyone that wasn't a halfling or thri-kreen as they were the original natives), and taught his Champions Defiling Magic.
As time went on, the wars began and soon the world, by the direct actions of Rajaat the angry halfling as @fallow shore put it, the Green Sun turned Red... and Athas as we know it came to be
the Sorcerer-Kings as we know them in the Dark Sun era were, or were taught by, the Champions of Rajaat
He was also a sorta halfling, a pyreen
The champaions of rajaat were mostly humans who were told they'd bring the superior age of mankind or smt
Said angry halfling is contained by the single most powerful being in athas, borys with the aid of a thousand soul sacrifices
The main thing is, halflings were the original natives. humans, elves, dwarves, etc... all descend from halfling stock on Athas
Sorta
Kreen were just doin Kreen things tho
according to Beyond the Prism Pentad, Kreen were original natives and the only intelligent race other than halflings during the Blue Age
so they were around. shrug
Funny how thri kreen just doesn't care
@fallow shore@novel dew Thank you for the edumacating on Dark Sun lore
see, Dark Sun has some REAL great lore, because Eldritch Machines that change the color of the bloody sun as a result of its use and impacting the whole world as a consequence? MWAH
but then the everything else...
It's never really explained fully what changed the sun
Yeah, it's kinda like going to an all you can eat as a vegetarian 😛
It is however a giant nature message
It's wild how often "wait that sounds like a meme that can't be real" turns out to be the truth in this game 
the irony is, I actually do like Dark Sun. I like the gritty, I like the grimdark. to quote a friend of mine, "There is freedom in despair."
It's the closest thing to a Dark Souls setting that we have by default. ...but then... motions to the unnecessary brutality, the utter moral gray of EVERYTHING and trying to be a good guy will generally get you killed or enslaved and-
What I like about dark sun is nuance
Halflings have a rich and defined culture but they're also cannibalistic and xenophobic as hell
the problem is that most people (which... unfortunately includes myself) can't really implement the nuance of Dark Sun well enough to make the iffy themes worth playing in for most people. You really need the right set of players willing to buy into the premise.
...that said, my greatest moment as a DnD player was on Athas as a halfling, so... ya know, there is that
Half giants assimilate the culture of any around them whether a peaceful (relatively) one or a band of elf marauders
ikr
Anyways the real moral is don't let the primordials win ever
And that we're lucky Zeus sealed the titans
heh
MrRhexx has good videos on Forgotten Realms on YT
Rhexx also is a terrible source because he doesn't cite anything, and often mixes in old lore with new lore with no delineation as to what is what... and also puts in his own homebrew without any form of disclaimer
he is not a good source to learn anything.
i suggest forgotten realms wiki instead
Yea it's bad he only sometimes cites but it's fun to listen none the less
If you want a good video source for forgotten realms lore; Jordphan. He cites all his sources
or the Mighty Gluestick channel.
Counter point: changing the world for the better is still baked into the setting, i.e. Avangions. One of the city states overthrew its sorcerer-king, something unheard of, thought impossible. And for all the moral grayness, slavery is still considered universally evil in the narrative. You will never find someone with a Good alignment to condone slavery on Athas. Ever.
Looks like Dragonlance has revealed new Dragonnel species.
The Dragon Army Dragonnel, and the Wasteland Dragonnel.
oh, interesting, i was going to disagree about the army one, but the army one's claws do fire damage interestingly enough
It is, but in a novel, iirc?
Deep magic ritual by halfling leading an attempted kill-all-humans (and also everyone else who wasn’t a halfling), using defiling magic of such high level it drained the sun down to its final life cycle
Kithara and Khelendros! 
I don’t recognize the one on the far right. Is she the one from the future novels? sturm’s daughter?
Okay. 🙂 you’ll want to narrow in a little bit. I suspect it’s the forgotten realms/Faerun/Toril (all diff. Names, same place) because that’s the assumed default for D&D right now?
The sorcerer kings are some of the most compelling concepts in D&D, for me. Incredibly powerful, to the point of fusing two disparate sciences in ways no one else can even fathom; a massive mystery beyond which even conjecture is slim
Mighty glue stick has some issues with glossing over shifts in edition and retcons without acknowledging that discrepancies exist, imo. Jorphdan does this as well but tries to point it out in the moment or circle back.
Mr. Rhexx seems to straight up fabricate stuff sometimes?
Good catch! I had originally just thought “oh good, dragonnels but without terrible art!” And moved on, I’ll check those out 🙂
very much so @ rhexx fabricating stuff/putting his headcanon in as fact
gluestick at least cites (and at least 80% in the vid itself says where the info he is talking about in a section is from)
Huh didn't know that, at least I got into DnD lore or DnD at all is because of him
That’s good! D&D stuff is fun. The lore is also fun.
Yeah the lore is very fun, I'm reading older monster manuals and I wish they would write more about some monster in 5e because they're so interesting
i have a question how does an ancient dragon becomes an immortal great dragon?
You're asking about great wryms from Fizban's?
yes
they are called great wyrms, but i call them great dragons
I think there’s no one way to do it
Great wrym was the age category after ancient in pre-5E editions.
[5E] Bahamut elevates metallics he think they deserve, chromatics state they can get it from gaining a vast incredible hoard, etc.
I think they leave it up to the DM what the individual dragon did to elevate to greatwyrm
Short answer: multiple ways involving Magic™️
The same way how other age categories aren't actually obtained just via aging
One way would be to become dracolich
Dracoliches are different from greatwyrms
@crude blaze thank you for the answer, but for a black dragon specifically i assume they will just need to watch and cause as much suffering and misery for mortals as possible?
If that sounds like it’ll work for you, power to ya
Greta wyrm as a template is a neat concept, the idea that they begin to vibe with their alternate dimension echoes is really interesting (Although a weird default given how vague and untouched on it is)
That’s likely going to be how they get the vast hoard they need, and a bonus, but not required?
Bit of a random question but, What type of teeth would a minotaur have?
In mythology THE minotaur ate human flesh
Human ish teeth I think? While they have th e head of a bull they’re meat eaters, I think.
I’m not sure to what degree being able to cook food means they could get by with cow teeth.
That is correct. I’m thinking of buying the old Forgotten realms books to just have an adventure
In monster manual it says minotaurs are carnivores
*most
So, it wouldnt be wrong making them omnivorous then?
since, even if their head contained sharp teeth, they still have a human digestive track most likely
It says most so probably there are omnivorous or herbivorous minotaurs
You're the DM, you make eat whatever you want them to eat.
Okay do you mean “have an adventure reading all this old stuff” or to buy an adventure to run/play?
I strongly encourage you if the first one 🙂
That is not a very good or valid answer in the channel to find out what existing information there is 😕
They asked, "So, it wouldnt be wrong making them omnivorous then?"
They did, but the framing device is detrimental, I feel 🙂
I had just gone back to check that though. Wasn’t quick enough to come back down and clarify. My bad OMYAC
DM's fiat overrides "official" lore.
a question what happens to red dragons when they mature, does their father kick them out of the lair or they can choose to stay in the pride??
I believe they're kicked out of the lair when they're young.
Have to check the previous editions' Dragonomincon...
I think in 5E sooner or later they feel a need to go out and make their own too
"By age 6, a dragon has grown enough to double its length,
though its head and feet still seem too big for the rest of its
body. It becomes physically stronger and more robust. The
dragon’s larger size often makes finding a new lair necessary.
Many dragons relocate at this stage anyway, especially if
they do not have parental support"
Not in a channel about official lore 
The point of a channel like this is the assumption set. “Aside from your personal preference what is the historical text view on this?”
Well, my point answering that question
That’s all. Just about focus and making sure we’re being productive. 🙂
We're heading into pedantic territory.
I do not think “be aware of the channel topic” is all that pedantic, honestly, but sure?
I dunno love. I recognized where I erred and offered apology and then it got brought up again as a general statement and I pointed to why having a specific channel is valuable. We can just stop, I thought that would happen when I said “I didn’t come back fast enough to fix it, my bad”
Anyway...
?????
i think we're way further in than that tbh
Anyway...
i don't think this chaneel is for that talk, but anyways my second question how many concubines does an adult red dragon normally have?
i don't wanna make this hard for my players
i am thinking like 4?
Wut.
I don’t think fifth edition discusses it? Third edition draconomicon mentions dragons trend polyamorous as much as they trend monogamous but I don’t believe it ever touches on groups pairing together, especially not in an anime harem style
Red dragons are typically CE (fiercely independent) so they don't have lifelong mates let alone harems.
what? so they don't have packs?
Chaotic evil means different things in each edition and each setting, that’s probably not a good metric to use
...
No, dragons are highly intelligent and function as people more than animals. They do not have packs or prides, they have suzerains that stretch hundreds of miles owned by individuals with alliances between adjacent individuals (or war, either or)
Most dragons, even metallic, tend to live solitary lives except when mating (or raising their young).
None, in existing lore.
Although as OMYAC notes you’re free to change that if you need it to happen, but the answer of what’s already there is going to come up “none of em”
Given their appetite, a region wouldn't last long if there was a pack of young/adult dragons roaming around to hunt.
so no dragon lives communally? weird i thought it would make sense to make a pack or a pride and hunt and get gold?
Dragons are apex predators.
Think of them more like tigers than lions (not all predators hunt in groups)
I don’t think you understand the size and scope of dragons? These are flying magic elephants with genius brains and bigger egos 
When a dragon has a group, it’s usually minions
pretty sure some dragons dont mind company of other dragons
Reading all the old stuff like the stuff by Ed Greenwood and RA Salvatore
The previous editions' Dragonomicon goes in further details of the dragons' ecology.
Mhmm. They’re occasionally polyamorous and such.
But they’re not lions with one male allowed in the local group or something
I also feel like I read in Fizban’s that sometimes an adult/ancient dragon will give parts of their domain for them to monitor. Could make for an interesting nation of dragons where each of the states or provinces are led by a younger dragon, child of the sovereign.
@main palm depeding on the red dragon, i don't think an adult will have a lot of mates but an ancient one will have a lot of them, cuz ancient dragons tend to control large areas and they need children to look after them.
also great wyrms are world ending events if you anger one of them, cuz they tend to rule over large empires
Dragons don't get weaker as they get older like other animals do. Ancient dragons are very powerful and don't need children to take care of them — if anything they're competition.
I took that as “need children to look after the edges of the large territory”
being an ancient dragon you tend to be unchallenged, cuz people don't know that ancient dragons are pretty rare, also if one of the children goes out of line the ancient dragon will just go to them kill them and give his lair to another child
Hmm. I don’t know lucha bout wyverns officially I should correct that
Aside from they sometimes spontaneously manifest from giant gems buried in the sides of mountains when the sun hits them [2e starter adventure: eye of the wyvern]
we interrupt your lore discussion for this breaking news: speaking of lucha wyverns, I cross body blocked an invisible one off the top of a daern's instant fortress once.
back to your regularly scheduled lore
Disagree? I never said anything about the Dragon Army Dragonnel. I only said what it was called.
Eventually, though, they do grow weaker, after many many thousands of years of life and injuries and such.
yes?
or is it true immortality with no power cap
I thought I'd read about dragons that reached that point
oh, i was gonna disagree that it was a new species of them
one thing i find interesting but am not sure what it means entirely, any chance anyone can shed some light on what this would mean? for a moonstone dragon to quote "die well"
as in past editions one of the rumors and legends around them was that "When one died well, its heart turned into a lump of pure adamantine"
With the 5E Fizban's lore they eventually become great wryms and they span with echoes across worlds.
would those echoes froma cross worlds be echoes similar to that of an echo knight
Think of them as the same creature across the different worlds.
woah. cool
so spanning with echoes is like projecting avatars or something?
I need to go read fizbans
Not that different from deities existing across different worlds/multiverses.
yeah in 5e continuity dragons are not only tied in with the prime material plane, but also the entire multiverse, that is why they have echos or counterparts that they can absorb into themselves to further grow in power once they become powerful enough to develope the new concept introduced of dragonsight
it all ties to the recent idea of the first world and how it lead to the many worlds and gem dragons we know today, basically in the 5e continuity when that first world was destroyed and sardior was caught in the destruction, his mind, his essence, was disperced across the various worlds on the prime of the multiverse that were born out of the destruction of that original world
Families of blue dragons tend to stick together, as unusual as it is for dragonkind.
and the greatwyrms in the lore of note among the gem dragons are working to gather all their echos, in hopes that one day they can reuinite/merge and basically allow Sardior to be reborn
so basically each of the strongest of gem greatwyrms is at least in 5e published lore a part of sardior working to rebuild itself and then join the others to bring back the ruby dragon himself
yeah blue dragons have a bit of a more communial nature than other chromatics, cuz of their lawful nature and how rare their prefered habitats are typically, at last going by lore across all editions
like the oldest one in a territory basically calls the shots and this is something the other blue dragons in the area more or less respect and honor
least as i recall
they are basically the counterparts of that dragon on those worlds, like the idea how in a parralel version of our world there would still be some version of you there
this stuff is basically explained across the context of the sort of chapter 0 of fizban's "Elegy for the First World"
In fairness though, you expect dragons to be unbiased when talking about their own history?
obviously
would anyone who isn't lawful neutral embodied be unbiased in that context?
Factual? Yes. Unbiased? Not so much. You can still be truthful while exaggerating a little.
The thing about the elegy of the first world is its...well its entirely false.
Dragons may not have made the world, but tell that to a dragon and see how many dice they start rolling when they open their mouth again. With sparks.
It's the dragon's interpretation, and while it may not be the truth you sure aren't gonna convince them you know better.
that's fair, they'd recount it as it happened and make theirself sounds like the most important part rather than just another boulder in the avalanche
Correct
I mean, Fizban wrote it, I'd expect nothing less from someone like him when it comes to that
given he is basically his more quirky aspect, at least in published lore, i imagine he would rarely if ever out right lie, but he may exadurate to enhance a point, but he likely only includes his bias as much as any other narrator in universe would
his personality is described here on the forgotten realms wiki, so likely even as fizban he is still like that to a degree, though seems to lean a bit more into his more quirky aspects from some of the stuff we see in the book https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Bahamut#Personality and given some of his quotes in the book like the first few "This book insists on sorting dragons into little, understandable boxes as if the readers had only 100 years or so to live and their tiny baby-brains could hold only so much knowledge…", "Poets do have a way of editing and exaggerating. I remember that time as one big, boring, patience-trying dilly-dalliance. A lot of hurry up and wait.", "It’s all too easy to prefer a certain color of dragonborn, but what’s inside is what really matters—which is to say, the sort of damage their breath can do to you.", "My favorite Ascendant Dragon monks all narrate their bodily attacks aloud with fun onomatopoeias. Swish ka-pow, indeed." so i feel any bias on his part would be accidental
after all, he is still a dragon god and dragons, god or not, their minds are just wired differently than us humanoids and mortals
like certain aspects of a draconic mind can't be overcome, or are near impossible to overcome, mainly thier pride, which is one of the things i love about dragons in dnd
DND Beyond said that the Dragonnels employed by the Dragon Army is different from the one from Fizban’s Treasury Of Dragons.
and they are, but only becaues their claw attacks do fire damage
if that wasn't the case it'd be the normal dragonnel but with armour on
Well it’s red.
In 1st edition ad&d, the wish spell aged the caster 4 years each casting of the spell.
The Dragonnels we were used to seeing were green, right?
to be fair the dragonlance book has 2 breeds, the one that are in the army and another called wasteland dragonnels
I know, I said that previously.
Here.
the one in fizban's is just an average example of them regardless of any specific world, so likely just a case where that artwork simply happen to be green
it says they're distantly related to the 3 main types of dragons in fizbans
so colour variation makes sense
that being said, i guess dnd is also the type of game where you abstract multiple different kinds of creatures into the same statblock
unless they decide to make multiple the way there's like, 6 or so for different kinds of cattle
other breeds like the ones used in the dragonarmy, seems to imply much like kobolds and dragonborn they have a bit of variety in their possible colorations
looks at all the variations of cattle 5e has
yeah, cuz especially in 5e, unless is a named individual or has some more specifying thing that more or less says it is reffering to a specific variant than the average one, average is average, personally i feel this is why the 5e tarrasque lacks some of abilities and features in it's 5e statblock that were previously popular, especially in 4e, as we know that historically there was more than one tarrasque, just there was more or less only 1 on toril specifically
Here’s a Dragon Army Dragonnel.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/attachments/10/183/red-dragon-army-dragonnel.jpg
yeah, mainly red and orangeish
just by the name i imagine the wasteland ones are more of a brownish coloration
plus they spit acid so maybe those are have some connection to copper dragons i believe are the acid spitting mettalics? but that is just my own personal speculation
but if it were to be accurate, in theory there would be reason to believe they could range in a number of the colors of their true dragon kin
I feel like WotC did Iymrith really dirty
Cause she had all this stuff to her name and some reason never used it in her fight cause 5e nerfed her into oblivion
since she only did appear, to my knowledge in one of the earlier adventures in 5e's lifespan, i feel they more so did not use her to her fullest, at least if it is similar to why they had a blue dragon so easily get board in hoard of the dragon queen, cuz they had to outsource to get it and the other first wave of 5e books out at around the same time, but from lore videos i have watched she is pretty powerful, but can't say for sure as i have not gotten to play storm king's thunder and would rather not be spoiled
Well the statblock instead pictures a black horse-like creature with dragon wings on it.
She had spells that could remove your spell slots and 1000's of gargoyle and animiated metalic dragons at her disposial
pretty sure that is just the place holder image for the dragon type when a creature is not given it's own artwork
Yeah, that’s what the lore says.
Ok. Well the horse-like creature was black and had claws on it’s limbs.
What is the place holder creature suppose to be anyway?
the same generic piture used in the icons for the filters in the monster galleries on dnd beyond
is basically just generic creature in the creature type in the dragon's case is basically the silloet of a red dragon from the older 5e artworks
i believe undead is lich, plant is shambling mound, aberrations beholder, monstrosity bullete, ect...
Where in DND Beyond can I find the picture?
go to the monsters page and the icons are where those pictures are, if you make a creature of that type with no uploaded artwork when making homebrew or modifying and existing creature it will default to the respecitve one for that creature type
but anyway, back on topic to lore, double checking their description the wasteland dragonnel of krynn are indeed copper like
quote "The Northern Wastes of Ansalon are home to wasteland dragonnels, draconic creatures closely related to copper dragons. Wasteland dragonnels are lithe and quick, with scales the color of dull copper. These playful creatures defend their territory by flying out of a foe’s reach and spitting potent acid, in an approximation of their copper dragon relatives."
I’m talking about the horse like creature, wish I can upload a picture if it but it doesn’t allow me to. Plus it doesn’t allow me to send the link for it because when I tried to it doesn’t allow it.
But yeah, I did saw that they said it resembles a Copper Dragon.
there is no such horse like creature, at least to my knowledge
I’ll upload it if I’m able to.
or could tell me the creature's name
They don’t say it.
usually the name of a description of what is being depicted is somewhere
why do hobgoblins hate elves?
do hobgoblins hate elves?
according to the monster manual
My understanding of the specific lore is dodgy but I do know that both hobgoblins and elves are originally from the feywild. Could be old territorial disputes or war grudges
I don't follow FR lore a lot, which the 5e core books pulled from to start with
4e’s Nentir Vale setting establishes that the hobgoblin empire was first destabilized when it tried to expand into the feywild and was defeated by the elves there.
In old dragon magazines (#63) it says that hobgoblins hate elves as antithesis, the emotional and holistic ways of elves are “un-warrior-like”, undisciplined.
It also seems to just be… a hanger-on from ancient days? Elves are the stereotypical CG faction, opposed to the LE faction 
That's interesting. Are elves depicted as seelie fey and hobgoblins as the unseelie? I've never been exposed to much in terms of feywild politics and always assumed that the seelie and unseelie were all eladrin/elves
Mortal elves were descended from the feywild eladrin, I believe
I think the "Hobs are from the Feywild" is a more recent invention of 5e MMOTM
Don't forget, there's also a caste system among the Feywild Eladrin.
The most powerful are the so-called Noble Eladrin, and the PC race could also represent the lowest caste or second-lowest depending.
Which would be the Fey Eladrin or Common Eladrin, I'm not sure which exactly.
the Eladrin are at least historically I believe portrayed as both.
among other Fey which also fall among the courts.
It’s a cool one, though, goblins being fairies, pressgang into service is neat.
Is primus still alive?
Which one?
I recently ran a DDAL module where Primus was mentioned by name so I can only assume them to be cannonically still alive
Is there a reason they shouldn't be?
Wouldn't be the first time a DDAL module got something wrong though, grain of salt
Actually, I remember reading that if Primus were destroyed they get replaced by the second highest ranked Modron right?
Last time I read a previous Primus was murdered by Orcus and he set off the Great Modron March years earlier than scheduled.
When a Primus dies a Secondus is elected to become the new Primus.
Think of the Roman Catholic cardinals gathering in Rome to elect one of themselves as the new Pope when a Pope dies (or steps down)
He was like… kinda stabbed
In the back
When was that?
Primus was murdered by Tenebrous (the then dead Orcus' "aspect") back in 2E — see the 2E Planescape module, The Great Modron March.
Primus is the leader of the modrons per the 5e MM. Whether that means the 2e module is not considered canon or the modrons have a new or resurrected Primus since is unspecified.
A Secondus would have taken over the role/title of Primus.
PRIMUS the one and the prime is indeed just going to happen naturally. When a modron falls a chain reaction of lower order modrons experience a promotion.
To be honest, Planescape I know from video game.
So any idea if there will be nods to Torment though? Homer Simpson voicing modron, Yakko Warner the skull, Tiefling and I think either Succubus or Aasimar. That and Nameless one.
Does anyone remember when Khelendros tried to make a host body for Kitiara’s shade and created a new sort of hand-dragon thing way after the war of the Lance?
He and some other chromatic began like, absorbing the mana from other dragons and there were five massively powerful dragon rulers and that was it?
[Eberron] Do cameras and photography exist or are they widespread at the technological level in Eberron's world? I think there might already be a culture of taking portraits in photo studios. What do you guys think?
"In the Eberron world, it would be nice to have this level of technology," or "I think that xx in the modern world can be replaced to some extent by magic in Eberron."
This is the kind of thing I think about.
my money is likely do to countless generations under the propoganda and rule of Maglubiyet, who basically took over all the pantheons of goblinoids and submitted to them to his rule, killing those that refused, but otherwise from what i know of is because elves embody basically everything they despise, thus consider being called an elf a grave insult, though again i think this may be do to being molded to fit their role in overall goblinoids under maglubiyet's rule
personally if wanting to know for sure, likely be best to hit up the setting's original creator, keith baker, on twitter, he tends to be rather quick to reply, at least in my experiance compared to like if you were to hit up someone from wizards of the coast
one thing i know is that funny enough, despite popular misconceptions, it is one dnd world were the firearm has yet to be invented, but settings like the forgotten realms have them, even if they are not that wide spread and thus rather pricy, which i find a little funny
do to the taint left by orcus/tenebrous, one of the ones up for the position was corrupted and after basically going rogue in all the ways they could for the challenge to determine the new primus, causes it and a group of rogue modrons to migrate to i believe it was acheron
Yup. Then mechanus got raided by ant people.
the demon prince of undeath really kind of accidently screwed the clockwork Nirvana even in defeat
though i forget if the Formian were native to the plane before that, just that their main colonies are on mechanus and arcadia
Pfft, accidently?
yeah, like pretty sure was not part of his plan
Well, not entirely no. But do you think he'd say it wasn't intentional?
he was basically focused on getting his wand back over everything else and defintitely was not planing on being rekilled
given his hatred for all other life in the mulitverse, i doubt it, cuz he'd likely just kill us and raise us as a mindless form of undead if we were to ask XD
also apparently the Formians are also known as "Ant-Centaurs" which is fitting all be it rather on the nose given their appearance
https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/forgottenrealms/images/2/26/Formian.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20150719213757
I mean, how else would you design it?
Already got thri kreen, so the two legged four armed bug is off the table
Two legs and two arms isnt even a bug, so thats a bust
Also apparently formians also reside on Arcadia.
So...yeah.
not saying it is bad, just a bit on the nose cuz like how lizardfolk call themselves the name of their god's mate, Kecuala
Oh no, nor am I
Also, huh?
...Actually that does make sense, be weird if they called themselves lizardfolk.
Be like us calling ourselves gibbonkin
like not all alternative names are so on the nose, like thri-kreen being known as mantis warriors despite only one of the major kinds resembling a mantis
by the way, in 2e they apparently looked like this https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/forgottenrealms/images/b/b8/Formian_2e.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20221206183111
I know, it's atrocious...
Not as bad as the 1e secundus
Man's posted up like he's gigachad
cameras don't really exist no. what people do sometimes to kinda fit in with the setting is to use something with Minor Illusion inside it to capture and project the image, and then a skilled artist nearby recreates that image on paper or another medium
that's how the various newspapers can have pictures, actually
Prestidigitation lets you "soil an object" permanently. With a lenient enough interpretation, that could count as a printer/copier
a question is there a famous evil silver dragon in the lore?
I don’t think so? Given the fact that metallic dragons are usually always good I don’t think there would be one, though correct me if I’m wrong
I wonder if Eberron's printing situation is such that they can record and project an illusion of a scene, but they cannot output it to photographic paper, so they ask an artist to draw a pattern of the projected scene, which is then printed in the newspaper.(I am submitting the text translated by the tool)
There's no reason for them to have. remember: Eberron's tech tree is not our tech tree. hell they have Gnomes with magic writing birthmarks to transcribe stuff, including images
very little reason to develop paths as we are used to
the death of primus happens in the story forwards in Dead Gods. does Modron March go into it in more detail???
Eberrons tech tree is "its not tech, it's magic"
Bug yes, insect no
How do you see the Vancian magic system justified in-game?
Not the spell slots, but specifically the fire-and-forget part (3.5e and prior ofc)
I don’t think there are any new answers out there for you, especially here instead of DM chat
Yo please tell me stuff like yellow dragons and Tiamat's dead sister isn't canon
Yellow dragons were in previous editions but they're not official in 5E (Fizban's retconned out a bunch of non-PHB dragons such as yellow, brown, purple, and song dragons)
It's just feels so stupid
How so?
I've never heard of Tiamat having a dead sister in all my years of playing D&D.
lol here's my OC dragon race that can beat most dragon colors in a fight through their cunning and speed despite dragons (Whites excluded) being notoriously cunning and the speed advantage being too minor to really do anything
Well, 5E retconned the non-PHB dragons from previous editions so you're not obligated to follow that. The lore at your table supercedes what WotC says is so for 5E.
Also Tiamat having a sister just feels wrong to me because there's already Bahamut and stuff
Okay... your table, your lore.
In general I don't like people introducing new species that are just better
¯_(ツ)_/¯
I can dislike some lore without the solution being "Alright just retcon that out of your world"
You brought up your OC dragon race that can OP other dragons.
Sounds like you’re talking about non-lore
I don’t remember Tiamat having a dead sister, the closest thing to a dead relative she has that I can think of is 5E’s Sardior
It's not my OC dragon race
I should've put it in quotes
Unless "I think yellow dragons are stupid" is something a character in-universe said, the sentiment probably isn't that useful or relevant in lore discussions, IMO. If you don't like pieces of lore, you don't have to use them or consume content that contains them
Yellow dragons were introduced in an edition of dragon magazine in 1982
Okay...
Again 5E Fizban's retconned them out. You're free to accept that or ignore it.
Just wanted to discuss them. If they're retconned I'm happy
Read Fizban's (which is essentially the 5E Dragonomicon as it had the same writer as the previous one).
whats the different between bladesinging and ellistrae cleric dance spell
#dnd-elder-editions perhaps?
You're asking about gameplay mechanics of the differences, no?
I would have to drag out my 2E book and I'm at work...
One’s a legacy spell, the other is a subclass. That’s essentially the mechanical and narrative difference, no?
More important than my question, have as much fun as you can there lol
i think theres an orange variant that spews sodium
I think it's from the same place as the yellow and purple dragons
i'm a game dev working from home. Sure thanks.
Ah nice
Youtuber Dungeon Dad covered a bunch of the chromatic and metallic lesser known variants from Dragon Magazine, including yellow, purple, and orange. There's also brown, iron, admantine, fang, song, and deep from the top of my head (I was just looking at the 3.5E Monsters of Faerun this morning)
Tiamat’s dead sister I’ve never heard of. Dragons of other colors are real.
OMYAC the OC thing was pronounceable taking a mocking tone not bringing up their own homebrew.
Yes, I understand that now — it was their lack of using quotes so I took the statement at face value.
Yeah it's my fault
not sure if i am the only one, but i feel moonstone dragons would be fitting at least thematically to join silver dragons along side the favorite monsters of Sehanine Moonbow, given how in 5e they are basically intertwined with the fey and dreams, not to mention they historically are known for being skilled in white necromancy, the one kind of necromancy she is described to even tolerate
like i get gem dragons are neutral typically, but i feel it would not be too far fetched for some moonstones to be in the service or answer the occasional request of the lady of dreams
Dragon Magazine 213 page 97 just in case

I only know about the white dragon that flies with a corpse mounted on her
Wait there are other colors
:O
arventurace is good or however you spell
Then I know about other dragons
This is the lore channel so that doesn't really fit
true but thats still a cool story
I only know about some of the most iconic ones of some colors
i will try to find something else
Daurgathoth, Inferno, Humanboo green dragon, Might change the world steel dragon, Arventurace and Golem army blue dragon
I wanted COOL, not to FEEL
Also ethereal gold dragon
but now I'm feeling things
you've been watching a lot of Rhexx huh 🙂
Brass dragons suck
Yes
Too much
I binged all of the dragon color videos
Might strike up dragon anatomy next
people say he's full of it, his sources are wrong
but I enjoy his videos and style quite a lot, so rock on I say
I love dragons
I don't play D&D so I don't care that much
I just like the stories
the white one was one of the best
have you seen the one on Zamzyr whatever
alchemy dragon
loved that one too
Started with the dracolich and turns out he's really similar to a dragon I made
Yes daurgothoth
In short it's a kobold wizard that believes that while every kobold is born with some dragon traits he was born with the mind of one, so through self made rituals he made himself into a multichromatic dragon
I have a character sheet almost ready for him but I'm having troubles choosing the feats
When I'm done I'm gonna make an alternate one because there were some things I'm not sure about
Short story that made me laugh for a few days DM 180
My house was minor damaged by Tiamat and
when I almost killed her she always go back to
the 9 plains of hell. This happens about 3 times
every 6 months in D&D terms. I want to put a
stop to her coming and destroying my house,
friends, and most importantly my hit points.
Can you tell me how.
simply die and tiamat leaves you alone