#overclocking
1 messages · Page 43 of 1
@exotic sparrow had to reset my pc
yes
Reason: Bad word usage
that is normal
you should've been able to clear your settings, then set XMP, then restart
I did exactly that and it didn't boot.
Did you un raid it
Dunno what that is
Well apparently you set it to raid mode
@sterile flame 👀 what kinda cooler u got on that
senior has won the lottery with that cpu
A 212 evo with deltas tied on with a Nike dadshoe shoelace
that’s about as bootleg as I’d expect from u ngl
and yet i yeet on everybody else with the same chip
Why a 212
for the memes
I overclocked a 6600k to 4.9ghz on a 14 year old TT big typhoon
it was a bit toasty though
realistic overclock goals on a 2600 should be somewhere in the neighborhood of 4-4.2 ghz
mostly closer to 4
At 4ghz you can use it to get some #1 3dmark scores like this epic one I did
😄
time spy extreme on a 1gb card. so much powah
It was surprisingly hard to get the few points I needed to get past the #2 guy
not much room for improvement with scores that low
Sup
I have killed lots of hardware, never just from high clocks
Nope, it just BSOD's
You reset, good to go
I have killed a CPU with too much voltage though.....I kept it as a momento of my oopsie
except maybe some ram on a radeon 32mb card back in the day, but that could have also been moisture
power=heat. if you undervolt a vega 64, you can reduce the heat and raise the frequency
I stuck the case outside my window when it was about -10F
WHOOOO
hell yea man, you can get mad overclocks like that
she ran good until she didnt
This channel better
later in life I just did a custom loop with the rads in a box that could go outside the window, but that was a condensation maker
Still arguiing in main chat
-_-
Oh for sure
SOmeday I'll do a custom loop
but not in my NZXT H440
This was around 2004ish
@solid arch look at all the room we have here :)
had a giant tower and a separate box with the rads. Was a pain carrying it around so I put quick disconnects from an air compressor and big ugly brass ball valve shutoffs.
that system was so much of a frankenstein
I wish I could find the cpu block from it. I would like to try it on a modern cpu
my waterblock is arriving tomorrow, i'm pretty hyped to get this up and running
i got a massively powerful pump to boot
PSA: Increasing frequency and only changing frequency will cause power consumption and heat to rise. To avoided this you also change voltage and/or use better cooling

Frequency itself can cause changes in heat, that's a very basic known about overclocking.
I don't think this poor atom is going to do very well, Its been years since I tried using it.
the board boots after I fixed it, but cinebench is crawling along very slowly
A mighty 43 points in cbR15
you could possibly get up to 5000mhz on the ram
but you will need voltage
lots and lots of voltage
you get worse performance on ryzen 3000 parts when you are no longer in 1:1 with fclck
3800 1:1 (so 1900mhz) is the golden cpu territory, that + tight timings is about as good as you can get on them
mine hangs during boot when trying to start the gpu at 3800 1:1
so 3733 1:1 (1866) looks to be as high as I can get
3800 is a lot to ask from the pcie at 1:1
it's all tied to the memory controller on the cpu
ya, but you can drop out of 1:1 to get higher. performance might not be ideal, but it would allow you to play around with higher frequencies just for the fun of it
hence the 4133 xmp above, I tried it
been there done that, went back to 3733
i'm all set memory wise at least if the ryzen 4000 parts can do higher 1:1
on my old z170 I had to drop fclk to 800 to get over 200 bclk. it would just freeze hard at POST
the fact that they can go that high is an improvement. my 2600 has issues with getting 3200 stable and my 2700x wont go over 3400
yea basically every 3000 cpu can do 3600 afaik stock
provided you have good memory/mobo
here's the thing though. it's not "frequency" per se, but workload and intensity of said workload. frequency (c) means nothing when latency and throughput are ignored. given these conditions, frequency allows for heavier workload over (t) period of time when latency remains the same. given heavier workload with latency being the same, throughput (d) increases. if throughput requirement increases, more transistors will need to switch within a clock cycle. there is a power requirement (p) for switching (z) number of transistors. there is a static number of transistors (a) within a core
the passage of clock cycles exists independently from that of throughput, however, the reverse is not true.
d/t=z
(z/a)=d
if z>a then d/a=c
p:d
What can we infer from this?
that math is hard?
if every measurable metric is lower when tested when at a higher clock speed on it vs a lower clock speed, there's zero point going for the higher clock speed
now if my bandwidth increased a bunch at a higher memory speed but my latency suffered, there would be use cases that would benefit in some work loads
I wouln't say zero point. its all about having fun if you enjoy pushing hardware to its max
but everything went down
these guys pushing m die to 5ghz+ arent doing it for performance, its all for epeen
btw, IF is your bottleneck there my man. best latency you could ever hope for on a subzero suicide voltage run is 50ns for mem latency at IF clock of 2000
LN2 clocks don't mean anything for real work, but people put a lot of effort into it
and a lot of money
but the conclusion we draw from what I posted was that power depends on throughput
there's an oc forum with a topic on 3000 part latency's and even at the highest 3800 with the tightest timings no one is getting sub 60 ns
I am sure some people at intel are still bitter that amd holds the highest clock speed record
at least when I last looked a couple months ago, can't recall the forum now
best me and da boyz ever got on any zen was 50.4 or so ns on a 1920x
zen 2 has looser latency yea
I think the best I have seen on my 2700x is around 70
zen+ can get tighter
but I haven't pushed it too hard
power is correlated with clockspeed via throughput,
power scales slightly exponentially with throughput
when the throughput is bottlenecked by how many transistors may be switched in each clock cycle, then power and heat scale with frequency up until the point where throughput becomes bottlenecked by the latency/bandwidth limitations imposed by the other components
SO
FREQUENCY != HEAT
higher frequency will increase heat even at the same voltage, but not enough to kill anything. especially modern hardware that monitors temps all over the cards and will throttle to protect itself
everything is power limited these days, so unless you go crazy and start bypassing power limits its really hard to kill a card
something like the vega 56 mods that GN used is definitely into the degradation range
you literally just argued for why frequency does increase heat.
here let me dumb it down for you. A transistor has 3 leads, A B and C. Positively charged materials is around Leads A and B with negatively charged material in between. Lead C is on the edge of the negatively charge material. When potential current is waiting at lead A and another current is applied to Lead C current passes to lead B and a small amount of heat is produced as a byproduct. if you were to rapidly pulse a current on lead C it would take more power and create more heat in a given time frame. If you pulse lead C even faster that's more total power used and even more heat. Lets call the pulsing of lead C Frequency as it is the speed of which you are pulsing. Increasing the frequency of pulses takes more power and creates more heat byproduct.
This is a VERY basic concept in entry to electronics. Now intender is correct if you don't disable safeties a CPU/GPU will clock down to save itself from over heating.
I like to throw caution to the wind.
did you read what I wrote?
Did you read what you wrote?
yes, heat is dependent on transistors that are actually switching.
yes and when you increase the the frequency of a CPU/GPU you increase the rate the transistors are activated, that's LITTERALLY what frequency means. Now technically that's 1 or 2 layers removed by IPC but the frequency means CLOCKS per seconds and IPC means INSTRUCTIONS per CLOCK. every instruction will activate transistors.
if all transistors are switching, then the chip would be consuming insane abounts of power
and idle and load would be the same
but that's not the case is it?
if you are putting a CPU/GPU under load at 100% usage the reason it does more work at faster frequencies is because the transistors are activating much more rapidly
it's not a hard concept to understand
so there are transistors that are activating less rapidly on idle?
not really
then what do you mean activating much more rapidly
they activate just as rapidly as at full load, the amount work changes and the amount of transistors used changes
that's it man
the amount of transistors being used changes
with the amount of throughput
like if you had read what I posted you would see that's what I said
and I'm saying if you are at 100% load like you would be in a benchmark the reason it works better with higher frequencies is the transistors are activating more rapidly than if it was at full load with a lower clock
that's the entire point
you don't understand what you posted. increase in frequency at the same given load will cause more heat.
that's what I've been saying the entire time
I would take a guess that Shingle took some sort of thermal dynamics course given the equations that were given
you make me feel like I haven't felt in years
less total load/usage != lower frequency
and yet equals less heat
that's a no brainer
more load and more frequency BOTH cause more heat
its loaded transistors per clock
when you run a stress test you are sitting at 100% CPU usage/load
that stress test at 3.5GHz will produce less total than that same exact test at 4.0GHz.
The load didn't change, the frequency did
lets say 5,000 out of 13,000,000,000 transistors are loaded per idle clock cycle. 12,999,995,000 are just chillin. clock speed is the same
no, the load very much so changes
you get more load per second with what you said
you can't increase the load more, it's literally 100% CPU usage there is no 110% usage, you don't have a magical extra core with extra transistors
you can increase the speed at which the load is handled
Get a shovel and dig some 💩 in a given amount of time.
Now do the same but faster. You now have dug more 💩 in the same amount of time. Therefore more load
load in this sense means % usage of the when all cores are being used to their fullest possible it's at 100% total, 100% on every core, 100% on every thread
the load doesn't change, the amount of work does
you still don't really quite understand it man
Two of the same CPUs but diff freqs, low (3.5GHz) and high (4GHz)
CPU high can do 114% of the load CPU low can
as i said earlier it's throughput dependent until you hit a bottleneck
Therefore you can see a 114% load
No i'm pretty sure my 140IQ brain understand it perfectly. Frequency increase at 100% CPU usage/load will be HOTTER. it's a well know fact of overclocking.

Just the perspective changes
big brain comin' through
nah, i'm out for real this time. if I stay I'll rip on you and get banned
maybe I'm explaining it too high level....

FASTER SPEED MEANS MORE HEAT.
did you get that one?
I can get in a call and say it slower for you
both usage of the CPU and clock speed are separate ways that both affect thermals
Think of load never changing perspective. When you OC the CPU the load is still looking at the base clock instead of the OC clock (again, we'll do 3.5 vs 4). At full load with that OC the utilization would look like 114% because it is comparing to the original clock
look you guys really need to chill with the back and fourth, keep it up i'm just mute everyone.
hei, you are thinking in terms of manual labor, not in the technical terms of a CPU.
If you think of load as work done, then sure. but that's not the proper terms for that
Which is probably where the miscommunication came through with this whole thing
fact is if you do the same thing at 2 different clock speeds the higher clock speed will be hotter.
that's all I've been trying to explain
Also what shingle was saying but in a different way
not really he is literally saying it isn't
Believe it was more of the physics stand point and how it was correlated but not directly related
I'm trying to keep it civil box
Don't worry
you guys can have a conversation all you want, but there is no need to start personal attacking eachother
You're supposed to take screenshots of the under load temps when changing frequency before and after
here. better yet, clock it to 4.7ghz with 47 uncore, p95 it, then do one at 5ghz but with 39 uncore

im telling your wife
system does not like CL14, causes a boot loop
everything set to CL15 seems to work, but for whatever reason is reporting CL16 still
How about I test this with an oscilloscope and some current meters:). What system? 2500k good?
New personal best :D
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/42090311?
Nice! Have you tried any of the geekbench open cl computer? I wonder if r7s would dominate
I have not
I love cuda and the market for hardware as well as the community of support, but I competition in the market
Another personal best in the other benchmark :)
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/42090768?
considering the BEST score for that system is in the 14,000 range overclocked, that's not bad, congrats. @trim fern
Ya i am not even overclocked lol
@sterile flame grats on beating Ecks in Firestrike 😄
Thank you 🐿
wait til I get my 1070 ti on there :v
wait til I get my 3800x on there :p
🤔
cuh
How much more power would be drawn from my psu if I overclocked a 5700 xt
I’m new to overclocking
Not that much
Sounds like we should start a leaderboard.
Separated per hardware to level the playing field.
I'm interested
Do it
Do it now!!
closest thing to ecks score I have is with my old rx480 and 6600k
and here is my 2080 and 2700x
Ya but are you overclocked cause i am not
😄 yay I'm a bit ahead for fire strike at that level of hardware
I never really ran firestrike very often
your cpu carried you in those tests. my 2080 was a tiny bit ahead of your vii in gpu tests
and I mean a tiny bit. .4% and 1%
I don't think FireStrike likes overclocks with Afterburner. It never ran for me.
honestly the only score I know my rank for is the one where I score 76 points in time spy extreme with my gt620 and got first place with all gt620's in extreme
Fire strike isn't as CPU weighted as Time Spy 😄
my 2700x holds me back from getting top scores with my 2080
9900k's and x299 chips get too high of a score from the cpu tests
yea
if I limited it to 2700x it might be ok
ya, #76 with 2700x and 2080
I should probably try and push into the top 50 someday
i love the new Radeon adrenaline 2, it makes overclocking a lot easier and more stable
My gpu scores are higher than the #1 2700x/2080 score, I just haven't overclocked this cpu
I really should try overclocking the cpu. still doubtful it will do much even on a loop
my first 2700x would overclock really well, this one not so much
my VII kinda won the lottery and performs above the average at stock so I hope that translates into decent overclocking XD
so far so good
funny enough when paired with the same CPU the VII has higher top results than the 2080
my 2080 is watercooled. if I could get the power limit higher I could get better clocks, but its fairly maxed in most of my benches. I might have another 50mhz on the core if I felt like tweaking

Team name?
NewEggers
Weggs
Could register on hwbot or just use excell for now
if your gonna make a hwbot, I will have to bench all my horrible hardware
Basically - go to benchmate.org, download, run, screenshot with the built in utility, ez
might motivate me to get this atom fully operational
I like hwbot because $$ down't buy rank - just globals but hardware points = skill, will garner respect regardless
I did a horrible job soldering the capacitors on this atom board
I couldnt find any that matched so I just put some other ones that I pulled of a dead motherboard together in parallel and soldered them with some speaker wire to the board
even used lead solder, so no rohs cert for me
Wait, what specs? if you want I can probs help
it works
Need to match polarity , type (e.g. electrolytic, ceramic, Al-Poly, etc) and capacitance or use a combo that has equivalent C and ESR/ESL
Voltage can be higher usually - as long the above is satisfied
the board was laying in a box and 2 caps got pulled out and a choke was knocked loose
the legs for the caps were still in the board, but the rest was gone
Perfect. Ya, those 16v 80uf etc electrolytic caps love to just burst when they feel like it after 5 -10 years
replaced it with some 25v ones off an old am2 board
I just guessed at the capacitance
the caps have something to do with the ram I think since it only sees 1 stick of ram now unless i increase the voltage to the ram then both sticks show up and work normally
might quit my day job and start doing this for a living
and when in doubt just hot glue it
I used to be good at soldering. this proved that I need to practice more often
I am hoping to get at least 1 good run in on 3dmark so I can get one of the last few steam achievements I need for 3dmark
Pick up a ts80/100 or used hakko, I like the cheap replaceable tips on the hakko. Buy 63 / 37 lead
Unknown F2-8500CL5-1GBPK F2-8500CL5-1GBPK 2GB
2048, 2048 MHz
1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
i am offended
lolol
I feel bad for dragging down the benchmarks for the gigabyte ssd with it running on sata 1 port
I am pretty sure all those low numbers in that graph are from one of my old computers
My CPU bench was considered to be like 105% until they made the change :(
ya they like to change things in favor of i3's
Now its down to like 83
I think the last time I checked it said the i3 9350k was better than my 2700x
They consider a 3800x at most a 99% XDDD ha ha no
I gotta go get my kids soon
I almost forgot it was early release day
something isnt right wiht my 2080 in that bench
For some reason I thought you were buying a kid because they released early
I have enough, not gonna be buying any more
Well disable monitor sync then
oh I see, I have gsync on that is limiting my gpu score
I'm sad that I just realised I bought the ram model with hynix c die instead of samsun b die
c die does well enough. most of it can do 3773
I got the F4-3600c16D-32GTZNC
When I looked it up at first I didn't see the C at the end xd
I wonder if I can tighten timings to like 16-16-16-32 staying at 3600mhz
If you are doing anything productive and you have sufficient cooling, you should be fine to get tighter timings on a good set of Samsung manufactured ram
I'm still pretty excited for tonight
Rise of Skywalker?
Putting the stuff into my PC and OCing it
Even better
I wish I could go see star wars tonight
I don't think I will be finding tickets
Maybe sunday or monday
What general area?
I wonder, would having a CPU with a big heatsink next to the ram make the temps better?
Bc the fans on the cpu cooler pulling air
I can't pre purchase, I would just have to get them whenever I had time to go
You would want a down firing tower or just more airflow for that
c die doesnt get too hot though. mine have no airflow and usually stay around 35C
I have seen them get up to around 42C
oh nice my gpu only hit 66c under load when oc'd
my only overclocking is with Ryzen Master and Adrenaline 2, sorry I can't help
Msi afterburner
Yo guys, im an idiot in computers, a friend gave me a computer he didnt need anymore and it came with a Geforce GTX 620. I want to overclock this bad boy but i dont really know how to approach it or if ill break it. any advice?
i already have the software, its called msi afterburner
Not going to get much out of that 620
Maybe LoL and CS 1.6 but that is about it
@paper yacht You're going to need a new GPU as that one wont do so much even if you manage to overclock it
What is the rest of your system like processor and memory?
uh how do i check that
You can download just the zip version
Reason: Bad word usage
alr
no swearing
Did you download it and see what your CPU is?
im downloading it rn
help
jesus why is it so like full of info
my brains gonna blow up
damn it
Like i may have mentioned overclocking a GT 620 you can't do much
You can keep it there so when you have a new GPU you could still use it
alr
Do you own a console as well?
yeah, ps4
Anyone have a good pc list for around 1k
Could play Dauntless on there since it is also a cross platform game
cause my cousin plays on a PS4 and i play it on my Switch
wait so can i plug up my keyboard and stuff to the ps4 and play that way?
Dauntless is better played with a controller to be honest
i mean yeah but i dont really enjoy controllers
and certain games you can use a keyboard and mouse for consoles
ill look it up
I believe Epic made their games work that way cause Fortnite works with keyboard on a PS4
But with Fortnite they have it keyboard vs keyboard and controller vs controller
Well for Dauntless try it out with a keyboard first
also Dauntless is not Fortnite
There is one other thing you could use but to some would consider it cheating
which is using this https://gamesir.hk/collections/keypad/products/gamesir-vx
what is it?
it would mimic a controller
ah no thats not
ehh\
idk
im just gonna download dauntless and see how it runs on very low
Dauntless is not particularly demanding
oh?
It is when using a GT 620
it utilizes shadows and light instead of a lot of textures, just enough textures
GT 620? oof
that's unfortunate
yeah
you might do well running dauntless at a low resolution (848x480) and the lowest settings possible
but i can't say for sure
ill try it
cuz csgo runs at 50 - 60 fps on lowest settings and on 1260x760
depending on the map it can be 30 - 40
i also have this problem where if i change my res on any game, it automatically changes its brightness down
idk why
@paper yacht when you have money to buy a new GPU i would suggest this one https://www.newegg.com/asrock-radeon-rx-570-rx570-4g/p/N82E16814930010
You'd be able to play CS GO at 1080p at very high and dauntless on high settings
I am using my dream GPU which is a 1660
goddamn gg
But also i only play Dauntless on my Switch so
i like it better on a console than a PC to be honest because i could also do Lan parties a lot easier
makes sense, its portable
its funny cuz i have a Razer Deathadder Elite, and a Razer Cynosa Chroma and my pc sucks and my tv is my monitor
Lets say you're using the RX 570 ok
yeah
you could use this monitor without any problems https://www.newegg.com/lg-24bk430h-b-23-8-full-hd/p/0JC-000D-00610
Cause for FreeSync you could just use HDMI when using AMD cards
Also 75hz 1080p IPS for 105$ is very good
freesync?
FreeSync pretty much eliminates any form of screen tearing when you have Vsync off
Ya i have to replace my monitor cause while mine has FreeSync i can't use it cause for Nvidia cards you need to connection VIA Display Port
and this monitor is only HDMI and VGA
as a screen shot ok
oh nvm most of the parts are unavailable
damn it i got to update my list
should i just buy the pc already built?
or should i buy the parts individually and make it myself
For what you want to play your system is fine you just need to replace the GPU and maybe the memory cause i don't know how much memory you're using
oh alr
but like i also want to play destiny 2
i might wait until i can work, and then buy my pc tbh
So I made this list.. this is my first list and I plan on building it sometime in the next few months. Input will be helpful
Your CPU can handle Destiny 2
oh alr
Go for a 1660 Super and from EVGA @echo zenith
idk why i clicked the link tbh i know nothing
MSI Ventus is like the bottle barrel card just like MSI's MK 1 series
Anyways for Destiny 2 the recommended CPU for the game is a i5 2400
with a 1050 Ti or 570 you'd be able to play on high settings
@paper yacht this is also for Dauntless https://i.gyazo.com/1b9049c4a69498708a603a7ecc487e5b.png
This is why i suggested the RX 570 cause you'd be able to play on high
uh simplify dummy brain no follow
minimum is what you need for low settings and recommended is what is needed for very high
you have the minimum for CPU but the GPU i suggest would be like the middle ground
The only time you would need to replace your processor is for newer titles
well newer more demanding
oh I missed the guy trying to overclock a gt620
most of them overclock reasonably well, its fairly easy to improve performance by about 30%, but sadly an improvement of 30% only gets you from 6fps to 9fps.
What is the best you can get on a 3400g
well im here again and well
a 30% bonus is still a bonus so ty for the info yall
is there anything i can change in MS1?
cuz the top 3 are unmoveable even with the settings
should i max the rest out?
afterburner?
No pinned guides? Rip

@paper yacht you can only change core and memory clocks. I was able to max out both sliders in afterburner, but I dont suggest you try to go that far immediately. Try something like +100 core and +100 ram. My core started to have issues around 850mhz for the few games i tried playing, but for benches i could max the slider. My ram went all the way to the max without issue. I might try unlock the BIOS some day for higher clocks but its just a card I have laying around so its no loss for me if it dies.
Urpf
Cinnebench does not seem to know my clock speed XD
I am still the sadness with old CPU.
I realized I had to save the $$$ for taxes :'(
asus x570 tuf at default mobo settings
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/380519382721495048/658104792157126693/unknown.png
enabling pbo gave no difference
I'm assuming as the default they have is "auto" that it's already enabled
pbo on + 200mhz setting and opening the window (it's winter) brought the room to 16c
cpu temp was locked on 68c during the test for a few runs after that, so a better cooler would help but kinda pointless for the small difference
not bad, thats right where my stock 2700x scores
alr ive decided to sell my ps4 in order to buy a gtx 1060 and replace my 620
nice
scratch that, im buying a gtx 1660 since its better and cheaper for the christmas sale
Still nothing wrong with a standard 1660
Depends on the price.
the 1060's are way overpriced right now since they arent making them anymore
any old hardware is overpriced there
4790k for over msrp, ddr3 at ddr4 pricing sometimes, 8700k for more than 9700k usually. It's a mess
aw
the price of the vega cards is most amusing
the 56 is 279 and it's like well, that's not the worst i've seen
but the 64 is like 650-750 range
64s should be around the range of 250-275 at this point given their position in relation to the 5700
they are often that much used
rip undervolting on my 1070 ti
only got it to -50mV
but now it can do 2100mhz at 1.075V at like 65c
Hah I did a stupid and got a 2080 super
i5 9600k 5ghz 1.328V idle temp 39c 😄 gaming 52-60c and stress test 10 mins max 70c
what stress test?
Run that on an AIDA 64 test and see if it stays that cool. AIDA is hardmode
When I run AIDA 64 on my 3900x the temp monitoring on AIDA 64 and Ryzen Master seem to have a fairly sizable discrepancy... AIDA says i'm tapping out at 49c and Ryzen Master says 60c, is there one that's known for better accuracy?
Ryzen master
Ok cool thanks
what can i overclock my i7 9700k to if i have the Corsair h100i rgb platinum cooler
Whatever the silicon lottery gods bestow upon you
Cooling is only part of it, not all silicon is the same
https://siliconlottery.com/pages/statistics
Probably something like 5.0 all core 0avx, +/- 100 MHz
So. Changed my cooler from a 120 to a 240 and the cooling is great now
awesome
Was running 80c with stock clocks and memory at 2666mhz. Now cpu at 4.7 and memory at 3000 and barely touching 60c
something about my build doesnt seem right
I know nothing and am new to all this but would like to know what doesn't seem right
something is bottlenecking and my gpu and cpu get overly hotter than before
Game? hardware specs?
mw, pubg, halo, kf2, smite, warframe, specs are gpu: asus gtx 1070 turbo ram: g.skill ripjaws v ddr4 2400 (2x8) 16gb psu: raidmax thunder 535w Mobo: Asrock AB350m Pro4 SSD: 512 gb WD black pcie m.2 HHD: Hitatchi 3tb 7200 rpm 64 mb cache cpu: 2600x
I don't see anything there out of place other than the slow DDR4 ram. What do you mean by overly hot?
Has your FPS dropped?
well my gpu reaches 180 farenheit which it never did through hdmi but now through displayport it like gets hot and my frames skip so much its hard to enjoy games
idk its age, but i open asus gpu tweak or try to but it never wants to open, and EVERY time i log in the fans say 31
Instead of ASUS GPu Tweak, try MSI afterburner. Works with any nVidia card. Uninstall the ASUS software first
See if that gives you a different result
whats the best way to uninstall
Windows 10 - Apps and Features
ALSO on my gf build i put my old 2600 in, bios and cpuzid say its running normal temps but speccy says its hot, which to believe?
is afterburner THE best?
might get my dads gigabyte aurous 1070 as well
do you recommend kombuster to test gpu??
No, If you're going to overclock, use something like the Heaven benchmark
Having too many GPU software installed can create problems
ok so i have afterburner
do the fan speeds register?
fan speed says 31 %
If you're curious about overall PC performance, running a userbenchmark and linking us the results can usually help
To the right of the fan speed number it says AUTO
Click that and make it Light Gray
then click the checkmark
power limit 100% temp limit celsius, core clock 0, memory clock 0
That's fine, those are for overclocking
Just want to see if the fan speed increases with load
so click auto then the check below it
Fire up heaven or another benchmark and see if the fan speed goes up with temperature
Ya
AUto should be light gray
Not dark gray
K, check it then run a benchmark or something to see if the speeds go up
wehre
do i download speccy or cpuzid or where do i read
so use heaven instead of userbenchmark
I think it's a better test. userbenchmark didn't get my GPU very warm
hit run or play now
run
nvm thats an ad lmao
LOL!!!
so what do i need to read
Your GPU temps and fan speed during the run
so i tab out??
You preivously said it hit 82C
it is laggin whuile typinhg wtf
benchmark has been saying 82 C but msi says 61C
wait only becasue i tabbed out it reach 82c in benchmark thing
MSI fan speed go up above 31?
file:///C:/Users/Adair%20Bear/Unigine_Heaven_Benchmark_4.0_20191224_2116.html
it went to 57 while i was tabbed out, and it is lagging while tpying rn with that app runing
The benchmark score isn't important. The fan speed and GPU temps are
Lagging is fine, it's a whole system test.
More concerned with GPU temp
it reach 82 in the software but while tabbed it dropped to 62 ish
Yeah, that's normal while tabbed
So, I'd try and set a your fans to 100% and see if you can hear them
CLick the gear icon under the Fan speed box
then the FAN tab
Then set it all to 100% and see if the fans spin up.
all of the points on the chart?
theres like 6 points, put them all to 100
yes, just to see if the fans speed up
Ok, so we know that they work
its ablower type gpu
nope
oof
but the curve it had was weird
Well, it's just a generic curve
I would custom set your own curve to have it go 100% around 70C or so
and see if that helps with temps
the curve it shows on default had the fan run 50 % until it greaches 80C then theyre supposed to spin 80%
I'd go 100% at 70-80C
I would run like 30% at 30C peaking out at 100% at 75C or something
Sounds good
or did ytou think 100% at 75 was better? also do i need to tweak anything in msi?
Click apply, then the check mark in the original window
Ye
check temps
ALso, if you haven't cleaned out your card in a year or more, now's the time
which check mark
so apply, ok, check mark?
Yes
it was grey
so
the highest it hit was 71c, but the fan was running full blast loud the whole time it was that hot, what is a good degree area to be in for that
71 isn't bad
However
If the card is over a year old, I'd recommend taking it out and removing the shroud and cleaning it with compressed air
it was pulled out one of those slim desktop builds
now could it getting hot be why i was also having frames freeze and stutter even in simple games? or? almost like the g sync wasnt working
so youre saying i should try gaming on it at these settings and see if its still suttering
AND CLEAN IT to help keep it cool and the fan from blasting. 😉
ik a 1070 isnt the BEST for 1440p 144hz but it can run some games decent, i dont expect it to get those frames in pubg or cod but i didnt understanding why it was stuttering so bad, making games unplayable
ill probably figure out how to take it apart and clean it , is it hard on blower types
base clock is 1506 and boost is 1750 on afterburner it says, do those matter?
BUT is it bad for the fan to run 100 alot?
It shouldn't. Typically a sign that either the card cooling fins are dirty or the thermal paste needs replaced
youre saying it shouldnt run at 100% too often?
i really appreciate the help btw its been bugging me and i didnt know why it was performing worse after upgrading monitor and cpu
rn the fan says 1822?? mhz?
now my proccessor is warm as well when starting games? normal??
Things being used get warm
It's normal
fan running at 100% with a blower style is fairly typical as those coolers don't work all that well
Keeping it clean can help keep the fan speeds down
Oh, much better than blower style
does pubg use alot of cpu and cores
because my cpu gets hot on it
also what games do ypu play id be up to playing sometime
my cpu is 64C rn is that bad
well its got the worse cooler of the 2 lol
the cpu cooler is the stealth instead of the spire because we i had to temporarly put it on there
while i wait for a refund from my water cooler
SOUnds like it's working just fine if temp is only 64C
If it were in the 70's I'd use something else
70 is still fine, 85+ isn’t so I’d start worrying if it was 80c+

I wouldn't run my processor at 75-80C
coolers are so cheap, keep it cool, keep it happy
26 dollars for a Hyper T2
130W TDP
if you have an AMD CPU you probably can even overclock pretty nicely on it
So I pushed my ryzen 5 2600 to 3.95 ghz but it wont sit stable at 4 ghz and I've pushed my voltage to 1.32V. When I run at 3.95GHZ I can run a cinebench test all the way through but at 4GHZ it wont stay stable. Most people can hold 4GHZ stable so I'm assuming I just lost silicone lottery or should I try to bump up voltage and see if it'll stay cool
didnt even see it lol
@wide robin have you tried 1.356v or 1.41v?
also if you don't think you'll get that much performance from 50mhz then don't bother
i can get my 2600x up to 4.15ghz stable all cores at 1.42v on the stock wraith spire cooler surprisingly.
Hi guys currently have a I7 6700K Overclocked at 4.2Ghz and want to OC it to 4.3Ghz or more. Want to keep everything cool and stable. What do i change in the bios? Motherboard: ASUS Maximus VIII Hero ATX. If you need pictures of my voltages lmk
I have overclocked to something like 4.7 and I had a blue screen so I lowered it to this so its nice but now its time to change to find my match.
How can you get the most out of your new Intel Skylake CPU?
Discussion: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/449645-intel-skylake-6700k-overclocking-guide/
Support us: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/75969-support-linus-tech-tips-our-affiliates-and-sponsors/
Join our co...
Follow this guide
Should get you somewhere, if not, at least more understanding
Ahh hmm, I don't have much experience with that, but the general idea is increase clock multiplier till u r barely unstable, increase voltage for that clock, check if u r stable, repeat
Ull have to ask someone else for more detail
Also obviously don't increase voltage by high amounts at once lol
theres still suttering when playing games what do i do
Skylake Overclocking Guide Haswell Overclocking Guide [With Statistics] Skylake Overclocking Guide [With Statistics] Welcome to the
Sorting through some olds pics - figured this is a good example of how any good b-die kit can be manually clocked/timed to whatever you fancy.
This is with a $100 kit of Teamgroup dark pro 3200c14's, tRFC/tREFI at a very relaxed 360/16k
Given 1.5v vdimm, 1.25v sa/io - I'm guessing there's much more headroom to explore by tightening (all the) subtimings haha
https://i.imgur.com/E32kbZs.png
I know userbench is a meme - but funny example of how easy it is to smash https://i.imgur.com/nJVvIv2.png
Lol it said my ram was 113% one time
Speaking of
I tried putting my sticks in single channel. And I was actually able to overclock them to higher frequencies
But
Ya know performance wise
that makes sense
one channel only uses one lane so you can reach higher clocks but with 2 channels you double the lanes/bandwidth
I had the same number of sticks
same number of sticks on one channel vs same number of sticks on 2 channels
Yea
Single vs dual
As in putting them in where they belong
Vs riiight next to each other
so the higher the bandwidth the higher the latency which results in lower clock speeds its a give and take game
Ahhh gotcha
more channels = more bandwidth
That makes sense
the reason we use dual channel instead of quad channel is to find the middle ground between latency and bandwidth
Gotcha. Would it be possible to build a PC that has a custom motherboard that loads everything from your drive to a slower ram drive of quad channel 32 sticks and use 2 8s as system ram?
Slower than the ram
Other ram
Ack I think you know what I'm trying to say
you probably could but one thing I always tell people looking for the most speed is "you are always limited by your slowest part"
Yea
nvme drives are very fast now comparable to ram of the past or "slow ram" lol
I would say on a best you could buy nvme ssd you could hit like 5gbps read speeds and ram can probably do around 17gbps. However back when we had 5400 rpm hdds ram was like 100,000 times faster
its a great time to be a gamer
dual channel ddr4 can do 45-60 GB/s read, write or copy pretty easily
holy wow it got a lot faster lol
I didnt look it up or anything those are possibly ddr2 or ddr3 speeds
64 bits /channel, one transfer on each rise/fall of the dram clock signal, so for 3200c14 - that's-
128 b * (1600 * 2) /8 for 51.2 GB/s max read
edit - or just 3200 *8 /1000 = 25.6 GB/s per channel.
@sterile flame yes I see so ddr4 so should be able to reach a maximum speed of 64 GB/s and ddr3 was limited to a max speed of 16 GB/s
that is stupid fast
DDR4 can be pushed to 5000MT/s , there's no hard limit at 64GB/s read on dual channel - but it depends on the platform's architecture + config ofc.
i have a i5 6600k and my question is is it smart to overclock on a single fan water cooler?
Maybe a little bit. Most 120mm AIO's are just OK for cooling. It can't hurt to try and see what your temps are.
I mean, run a benchmark that forces it to full load for an amount of time. If your CPU maxes out at less than 70, you have a little bit of room to overclock.
so if on the full load bench(like the one on msi aftherburner) reaches less then 70 i can oc to about 4.0?
OC until your temps get too warm
Intel says maximum Tcase is 64C
So, maximum core temp is 80C or less.
Overclocking is a slow process @quasi jewel (sorry for the ping) like they were saying ^ you need to investigate into your chi. He's suggesting not over 72 so pull up a program that can watch temps for you then run a benchmark like Cinebench, CPU-Z, prime 95 etc. See what your temps get to right now. If you're manually over clocking go into your BIOS and set your multiplier a bit higher and run your bench mark again (I usually go by 0.5 ghz per run until it either overheats or becomes unstable) if you can run your benchmark within heat limits after bumping up bump it again (bump it based on how close you were to 72) if you hit the limit then don't go any farther. There is also the possibility you increase it and the system freezes. If that occurs up your cpu voltage to make it stable again then run your benchmark and monitor temps
Sorry for the long message it's just kind of a slow monotonous process. It can take a little while to figure it out and you want to make sure you do figure it out. My first time out I didn't know what I was doing and destroyed my cpu like smoke and all
Going online and seeing what other people can get with similar coolers can be useful because you can get a benchmark but you can get screwed by the silicone lottery
If you're real close to 72 ignore my 0.5 ghz do like 0.1
why would 72C matter for a 6600k. TJmax is 100C.
You should have no problems with running it up to 90C without worry, but I would suggest trying to keep it under 85C just for longevity sake. I am currently running my 6600k on a cryorig c7 in a tiny 5.7L itx build. clocked at 4.5ghz it usually sits around 80-84C under load.
I dropped the clock to 4.2ghz for the sake of my ears since the fan on the c7 screams like a banshee at full load
@quasi jewel
generally speaking I would say try and keep it under 1.3v and you should be good. I think my chip is slightly better than average silicon, but I have had it up to 4.9ghz. I ran mine 24/7 at 4.7ghz for about 2 years at 1.37v on a 240mm aio and temps usually maxed around 75C. Now that its in my itx build I do 4.2ghz at 1.22v.
Is 3rd gen ryzen just bad for oc or would it be my b450 mobo limiting it?
Its not heat because its like 60 degrees under load
Can anyone link me a guide for AMD master OCing with Dram?
@minor cape is this https://youtu.be/7w1EGPZUESU what you're looking for?
Play World of Tanks for free: https://tanks.ly/2KnfvSl New players will receive 500 gold, 7 days premium time, and a T-127 by using my code TANKTASTIC. Thanks to Wargaming for sponsoring this video.
Overclocking AMD’s 3rd-gen Ryzen CPUs is pretty different from previous ge...
If not. Its still a really great video
nope seen it
Has to do with the ryzen master itself
3rd gen ryzen OC's itself better than what all but few users would be willing or capable of doing.
I see it as a feature - no /s intended -almost like how an 8 speed dual clutch automated transmission is often superior, yet less fun than an H pattern
2
Thanks
YW
Can someone tell me the highest frequency to overclock my 1700X?
ur gonna have to test that yourself my guy
mines at 7.3 GHz atm
those would be record clocks
I know nothing about OCing can a Ryzen 5 2600 be at least very slightly OCed with the stock cooler ?
maybe slightly.
I overclocked mine to 4ghz on the stock cooler, it got warm.
Or are there cheap coolers out there capable of OCing 2600 and 3600 also since I’ll be upgrading (more than a little, would like to push em GHz)
Yeh, I guess the stock coolers aren’t the best ones for OC
and generally somewhere around 4-4.1 is about as far as they like to go
Yeah, alright
I can get mine into windows at 4.2 but its not stable
I heard there are decent coolers though
For cheap
That can keep the CPUs cool most of the times
I have the cooler from my 2700x on it now
Scythe Mugen is a good air cooler
anything like a hyper 212 should be good enough if you are looking for cheap
Mugen 5 Rev b
If I can afford both which one between hyper 212 and Mugen will have lower temps when OC
I think there is one mugen that is fairly cheap, but if you are looking at spending that much money and have the space also look at the noctua d15
there is one rev of the mugen that is $50, the others are around $100
Mugen 5 Rev b
I’ll think about it, I think shouldn’t spend too much money on a cooler though
I was thinking about the stock one for a long time
But then I thought about OCing and was like why not
honestly anything more than that scythe is going to be overckill
the 2600 is not that hot of a chip
Nope
with the stock prism cooler at 4ghz mine usually stays under 65C
Will be upgrading to 3600 or even 4xxx in the future though
well stock from my 2700x
If you're upgrading to that, go Mugen 5 Rev b or better
the 212 on my 3700x was no better than the stock cooler
Yeah, alright
I know the 3700x has more cores and runs hotter than the 3600
if you can wait it out for the 4000 series it will probably be worth the upgrade assuming they don't have supply issues
I have decided to hold on to my 2700x. I originally planned on getting a 3900x, but the lack of supply kind of stopped that.
Yeah, those are not in stock very often from what I see
but with the 4000 series so close I feel like it would be a waste considering my 2700x still fits my needs for now. I just have to avoid the urge to upgrade.
Yes
If a CPU fits my needs I would stick with it for as long as possible
Unless you want to test out something newer
25% floating point
they probably wont have stock in stores until the end of feb or march
Intel or AMD ?
intel
Yep I guess that’s true
I wouldnt expect amd to have anything on shelves before may
AMD people might be switching to 10th gen
Nah
there are always fickle people that swap constantly
Competition is still pretty alive between those two companies
When I was younger I constantly bought hardware, I try not to buy as much anymore.
I upgrade every 3-5 years
The only computer hardware I own is a gaming mouse a MacBook Pro and a case lol
First build in March-april I think
Anyways thx for them coolers I’ll check em out
Happy Sunday
Happy SUnday!
Hey guys, whenever my pc wakes up from sleep it freezes, and its a new build. Has a 9900k and 32 gb of ram at 3600 mhz... Processor seems stable at 5.0 ghz turbo, and its watercooled so my temps are always 40-50c even under load. Anybody have any idea what could cause this?
I have lifetime malwarebytes premium on and it scans everyday... so I dont think its a trojan causing usage spikes either...
um, how can I overclock the ryzen 7 2700x without damaging anything?
make sure you have a good cooler, and dont over voltage
Shouldnt be able to damage anything only like a 1% chance. Most of the time the cpu will shut itself off prior to damaging itself but yeah like @woven path said dont go crazy with the voltage
Voltage is #1 CPU killer
raise everything else up until it quits, then raise voltage carefully
and slowly
scary
All things overclocking go here. Learn to overclock, ask experienced users your questions, boast your rock-stable, sky-high OC and help others!.
yeah man voltage killyness is relative
i've yet to kill anything overclocking and my brain is like
most of the time
if you haven't killed anything are you even overclocking
But in seriousness, it requires some effort to kill modern hardware though. I occasionally see someone who just shouldn't be allowed near a computer, but most people are too afraid of killing something to ever push hardware far enough to kill it.
then there will be that one guy thats like, I overclocked my 9900k to 5.3ghz on air with 1.5v and its stable. And you just cant convince them that its a bad Idea.
i mean yes
i am overclocking
my rx580 runs at 1499mhz
for some reason 1500 does not work
and precision boost overclock reaches 4.2Ghz on my ryzen 5 2600x
but like i'm just using fans and air coolers i have no reason to be heavy overclocking
wtf man my rx 580 gets 1685 on air stable
and my 1600x gets 4.2 ghz on my dark rock pro 4 cooler at 65c max when using cinebench
R20 and blender
how in the world do you get 1685
He goes fast
Mine only does about 1585
how about memory
honestly never really pushed the memory
Is the h100i a good enough AIO?
Sweet
how difficult would it be to overclock 3600MHz RAM to 3733
Pretty hard
my modules are rated for 3600 but ive heard 3733 is the sweet spot for ryzen 3000
my motherboard supports 3600 and 3733 so should i bother
Eh
I think 3600 is the sweet spot, since avove that you need to oc infinity fabric
And it depends on what ram modules you have
Not worth the bother
hey guys new to overclocking. just delidded my 7700k and put thermal grizzly liquid metal, no silicone to seal and have it clamped with the mobo. tested with aida64 extreme - stock i was getting 55-62c. i jumped straight to 4.7ghz and 1.29 volts. is that okay?
simple question. components are only six-7 months old should i wait till warranties are out before trying to oc?
They're quite unlikely to go faulty at stock settings
So I don't see the benefit of waiting
But it's up to you
Yes and no
are your temps normal
After panels closed its 68-72 under load, highest spike was 78
Its the first time i manually set a voltage and just read that voltage is the main cause of killing a cpu so just asking if it was fine 😭
Oh okay
Def not
your pretty safe my guy
Thanks homie
Hello
i got a question can i overclock a i7-9700k on a asus prime Z370-p II motherboard the cooler i would be using is a cooler master hyper 212
yes but not too far
you can overclock, but just not very much, you will be thermally limited most likely
Can I overclock my pentium?
the manufacturer has a specified speed at which the product runs
Ok
No, your H61 motherboard doesn't allow that
I wouldn't suggest you over clocking anything on your pc Flight.
overclock the case duh
@exotic rapids u overclock ur monitor?
i have not found time to properly do it
Oh
Can I overclock my downloaded rgb?
but raise it 1hz at a time, play a game for 5 min and check for errors
U know a good overclocking video I can follow for monitor??
Gpu?
yes
NvidiA
ok you overclock in the nvidia control panel
Will it break the monitor or will it fix itself?
I guess 80 is ok
Could I just say it was a power surge?
Unless your monitor is rated to run higher on the box or smth
like mine came 120 but it said 144 on the box
The effort to go from 75hz to 80hz isn't worth it. Especially at the cost of color quality which typically happens
Yeah. I mean the difference between 60 and 80 tho...
That is noticable
Just shake your view a bit
You can see the frames
If it's 60
Or worse XD
@quick rose and @wild glacier Are you online 24/7???
Seems like it




