I'm taking 15 strike July 27th puts for these reasons. As a person who has taken countless quantum computing classes and gone to a few research conferences, everyone knows that these small quantum computing companies have lacking technology compared to GOOGL MSFT etc, but even with those companies the consensus on "useful" quantum computing is likely more than 15 years away. The problem isn't with Qubit number its with gate accuracy (it generously took at least 5 years to increase gate accuracy from 99% to 99.5% and we need 99.99% for anything signficantly useful). So what is happening with QBTS? They are up 30% today off of re-releasing the news that their system is available to the public which caused a short squeeze as borrow rates went through the roof. Why can't this last and what are the companies fundamental, well firstly no one is going to buy this system to be honest. QBTS uses quantum annealing which was abandoned by everyone else for a reason, it's much less reliable and is essentially old technology. Now we wonder, why did their revenue grow 125% last quarter? The answer is that they had a 1 time sale to a group of researchers who wanted to test out this quantum annealing (they had 15 million in revenue with 12.5 million coming from this system or something like that). So essentially they have no revenue growth, and are one of the "worst" in the quantum computing space together with $QBTS. If you want useful quantum invest in GOOGL and MSFT, others are worthless. For some honesty, the reason why I quit being a quantum computing focused student is because I lost faith in it. From everything I know gate accuracy will signficantly inhibit quantum computers. Maybe AGI can fix it but for now I see no future in it.
#QBTS SHORT POSITION
83 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
was looking at this company for a few days, am prone to short this pop but I do not have a big position
Yeah I’d be careful w pure short since borrow rate is high rn
Also note this one time sale is their only sale in 4 years and this group lent out the computer to another company which said it’s worse than a regular pc
Atleast riggeti and ionq are trying to make a real quantum computer rather than this scam
Did you mean June 27? Or July 18? Also, what’s your reasoning for this timing? Earnings aren’t until August 6, when we’d get a report of how many (or to your point, how few) customers they’ve signed or sold to. Is the idea just that it will drop back after the short squeeze?
Just trying to better understand. I appreciate your write up and dd. I’m not in the quantum computing field but that buzz word is starting to get thrown around in my industry. We’ve all just rolled our eyes at it so far. Great write up!
I have both, and stuff for august too. Yeah obviously I think fundamentals will align eventually. Honestly the IV is extremely high so the longer dated stuff doesn’t make sense. Squeezes always come back to earth, but imo these companies are completely worthless ($0 evaluation) especially qbts and qubt who aren’t even trying to create a quantum computer. If quantum happens it will be by GOOGL or IBM imo, like even MSFT has an outside shot which just shows how pointless these small companies are. Appreciate the compliments!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eo_VV0Z4aE&ab_channel=632nm good watch ceo of ionq
In this episode of the 632nm podcast, our guest traces the evolution from the early days of Bose-Einstein condensation experiments to pioneering trapped ion quantum gateways. He reveals how breakthroughs in laser cooling and atomic clock research unexpectedly paved the way for the first quantum logic gates, beating out the BEC community at a piv...
start from 1 hour ish
p honest take on the quantum space from someone pro it
im 220k deep in short/puts rn
tldr if quantum does happens its not these small fry companies
He starts talking about it at 1:10. Gets to it at 1:15. and plugs Quantinuum as touting the highest accuracy at this time.
Good info. Thanks
1/
$QBTS
🚨Huge news🚨
The USC paper claiming "Scaling Advantage in Approximate Optimization" has been DEBUNKED just one month after its publication.
https://t.co/fCZoCHjY7T
In this thread, I'll dissect some details of the story and important implications about D-Wave's behavior.
I mean they r doing ta I leave them be
Doesn’t change fundamentals
Some UOA but long term doesn’t change my outview
Now have more shorts than puts
Their next earnings is going to be v bad. Only 1.2 mm in bookings expected 80% drop in qoq rev
All the small quantum companies u can mainly think of as p&d scams
Esp those w quantum in the name
yeah IBM and GOOGL r from what I heard the top 2 dogs in the quuantum space
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.22514 good read on a response to USC's paper claiming dwave had supramecy
if u dont have any quantum experience its hard to understand whats going on but the first page gives a pretty good summary of their findings
its essentially the same thing where they find v obscure algorithms that havent been optimized to showcase supremacy
Have you seen Martin's take?
yeah I have
he's mainly right, everyone knows dwave is a hype stock grift
Niccolo de Masi, new CEO of $IONQ and huge pumper of the quantum space (called it the next NVDA and a 20 to 30 bagger causing a 50% increase in share price). Files to sell 100 mill (all his shares) https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1480011/000195004725004170/xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml
I thought IONQ wasn’t in the quantum annealing space like QBTS and QUBT? He kinda trash talked it in that video above. Made it sound like IONQ was above all that. Maybe he found out it was a grift and got out?
Or he knew something all along and the rug is about to get pulled.
I mean they trade in the same wavelength
in the quantum sector
they are related in the sense that when retail thinks quantum they think of those 4 stocks
so distrust in one affects others
IONQ is better than QUBT and QBTS in the sense that they are a legit quantum company trying to make a QC but they are still massively overvalued and have been pumped by Masi supremely
should be investigated imo
tp 25% of my short today for risk reason
Re entered pure short
Their quarterly was horrid
QCAAS revenue fell 40%
Which is the “advantage” they’ve been claiming
Only reason rev was up since there was a residual 1.2 m sale from quarter 1
I’m planning on slowly sizing up my position
Borrow rate is very low and every pump I just add to short
Getting out now
Yeah I made around 25k, did a lot more short/cover but the stock pumps v often
Okay so the thing is within the quantum space IBM and google are best and they do what RGTI which is error correction gate based QC
But the thing is QC is such a small part of quantum computing that it hardly captures any % of google and IBM’s current mcap
So in the sense of creating the best QC u want the most error adjusted qubits at least for what googl/IBM is
Yeah I don’t really touch puts anymore since these usually take a v slow death
The arguement for QBTS is they aren’t a QC company
Legit say they optimize and alr have quantum advantage when they have decreasing revenue and r basically useless
Honestly I personally own a lot of GOOG just cuz I think it’s a solid company lol
Atleast my current shorts In quantum is short every pump and close out after 20-25% crash
I just took outside money for the first time so I stay away from options cuz of that too
Yeah I mean I think one of the largest arguement against qc is that no one has found a use for it other than shores
So it’s uses are very limited
Creating these algorithms hasn’t happened in 25 years so they can hardly have that much applicable function
Decryption will happen but ppl will just move away from sha
Donate to FarmKind at: https://www.farmkind.giving/donate?promo=lookingglass
I finished my PhD in quantum computing in 2020. I loved the research, my supervisor and my colleagues were amazing, and the field was booming with new start ups being spun out everywhere. I choose to leave the field anyway. Here's why.
Very good video on qc
I agree w the ai bubble
But I think google benifits the least from it
But keep buying dips that’s smart
I don’t think qc can be an ai fallback simply because it doesn’t have the applications
Another decent summary vid of Dwave specifically
For original short-selling research and much more check out our website: https://www.differentiatedanalytics.com/
Use promo code WSM50 at checkout for 50% off
In this video we evaluate recent claims made by the quantum computing company D-Wave. They claim they can make a quantum blockchain that is 1,000 times more energy efficient than Bitcoin....
Puts?
No
Just short
Puts too expensive
Thing needs to die
Started a rgti and qubt short today again asw
took some profit ont he qubt offering
