Renderer 3D outage

[wanton rampart]

Since I have a low-end PC and want to make my game available for low-end PCs, I need an older renderer or one with better performance. The current URP uses a lot of 3D rendering, even after changing the DPI. My goal is to get at least 60 FPS on my GT 710.

It is definitely possible to get high FPS, the card is not too old for this and should be able to do this just fine

[rapid cargo]

Whatever render pipeline you're using, you need to optimize your scene and the quality settings to get desired performance for your target hardware
What that means depends on the scene and the render pipeline, there's no renderer that automatically makes your game run well

HDRP inversely generally makes it run worse, and takes more work to optimize as it's intended for high fidelity over performance

What kind of rendering optimization is required is fully dependent on what kind of stuff and how much of it your game is rendering

[wanton rampart]

It is a simple scene without anything and i get around 25 - 35FPS only

Maybe LWRP mode or some functionality, let me know which is the best

[rapid cargo]

Project settings>Quality should have a "low" graphics level, if not, you can define one and even strip down the default one, and disable any renderer features in the renderer asset
Alternatively make a project using the built-in render pipeline rather than URP and downgrade the graphics quality there

As far as I understand GT 710 was not considered a viable card for gaming in 2016 let alone now using it for game development, and that you can likeyl get something better for nearly the same price

URP is considered lightweight, but the card may be so old the render pipeline's inbuilt optimizations aren't properly supported by it

[wanton rampart]

Thanks for the help i checked the pipelines and packages

The URP was installed as package by default so i uninstalled it and use the un-built low tier rendering

From 30 to 120-160FPS

Probably it was designed for high-end devices ect

[wanton rampart]

I paid $70 for it 2 years ago 🙂

Good deal back then

[rapid cargo]

It was designed for modern low to mid-end devices, though not ancient ones
And unlike BiRP, URP by default has all the highest quality graphics settings enabled

[rapid cargo]

As I recall at that point in time even the best deal available was pretty awful
Your concern now is only that you can't develop around modern graphics features or optimizations
So you'll be spending effort to keep the graphical performance decent on your machine using old techniques that aren't that necessary or effecitve for new ones
But maybe that's not relevant to your development

[tribal fern]

Pretty sure you should be able to get comparable performance with urp. You should've profiled the project first.

[earnest trout]

not hate, but it's a really old GPU that's also not meant for gaming

[wanton rampart]

It is fine for gaming been running 2+ years great any browser game and avarage low settings ones but I fixed it by removing urp rendering which is more advanced for unity

[rapid cargo]

Did you try lowering quality settings and disabling renderer features from URP before you removed it?
Don't draw conclusions if you have not tested your assumptions

[wanton rampart]

I just moved to builtin renderer and changed renderer path and other settings off with a massive FPS boost

[rapid cargo]

Indeed

So you didn't do what I initially suggested and don't really know if URP would've been fine or not
But that's not our problem to solve at this point

[wanton rampart]

I do not need URP at the moment which is more for high end devices + it would take many time to figure out the correct lowest peak points

[rapid cargo]

HDRP is more for high end devices, not URP

[tribal fern]

Arguably, urp can be lighter than built-in at times.

It's not at all for high end devices.