#scientific tech tree
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I'm not too sure how important it is for now, but just know that future expansions will have to add more detail to be able to expand the tree
All I'm saying is: is this leaning more to the current version, or to the "completed" tree
-# Also bloodybelly comb jelly is my favorite
I'm trying to keep the balance, I still want eukaryotic cell, sponges, jellyfish etc in the middle but keeping it scientifically accurate as possible but I think for now it's leaning to the current version more
it's nice to have another comb Jelly lover here
Do you want to change gen names? Also, what does it say at that top thing
maybe some of them like ungulate cuz they're paraphyletic
also is says insects, ignore that one
Like, personally, Sponge should be changed to Animal, Jellyfish should be Parahoxozoan, Flatworm should be Bilateria, & Fish should be Chordata
maybe your unto something
but I like to make the division "less obvious" tho
like having a notochord node that connect to all chordates or something like that
this is cool
do you have any suggestions, anyway I just posted the updated version of this tree