#tourneys-discussion
1 messages · Page 80 of 1
@chilly terrace Tournament seedeng nneeds to look winrate and avarage damage, one example 2 teams have same avarage winrate of top 7 players 62% but avarage damage isnt same so even if both teams get good seeding in seperet groups and because it goes strongest-weakest teams that are classified as "weakest" have much higher chance to get top 3 places if they played against one of those two teams that had lower avarage damage
look ascent tour #1 (ticket) group 2 and teams in it (my team is V-F) and then look ascent tour #3 (ticket) group 4 and teams in it. Or look GNEIS team and their groups where they are always "strongest" and get so good groups to make it easier to win
Well we do get TESRH in the second round on one occasion though. I believe we only get 2 good groups so far. Also our Saturday groups are never nice.
Look at how Von did on the NA server, they rigged their wr by adding rerolls and got an easy qualifying bracket. Since qualifying for the pros they've won a grand of total of 1 set. It isnt unfair in any way bc they took advantage of seeding, but it isnt the best representation of NA and I'm sure this happened for other servers as well
in eu UN1 had a lot of rerolls so they get better avg wr of team
-VON- really shouldn't have made it
Of course not, but they didnt break any rules to qualify, which Is why i think the current mm in tourneys should be reworked
@crisp shore look your groups and my teams groups (V-F), and tbh bot of our teams are simillar in skill but just because you get better seeding it makes it easier to you
I think the current seeding needs to look at total battles
it def need one mor value to look and not only wr because its inaccurate
@vital obsidian Mixed type of control will be there.
Good to know
@green sierra Tournaments are not about personal effectiveness and average damage of each player. Tournaments are about teamplay and coordination between several players. In this way, winrate shows how player can play in a team better then other parameters.
@thorn shale You cannot low wr of your team without loosing in quality of team. Because average winrate calculates based on 7 best players in a team.
its not about low wr, its about rerolls and their 70% wr that allows them to exploit seeding and get better position in brackets
@chilly terrace - As a note, in my experience ,average damage is much better for seeing tournament potential than raw win rate. Higher damage always correlates with better game play at higher tiers. Win rate can be boosted by playing lower tier tanks which can offset poorer performance in higher tiers. Maybe it would be better to consider Tier X win rate if average damage is not a metric you wish to use? - - - or rather, win rate for the highest tier the tournament is being played at?
So for example, only look at Tier X win rate in the Tier X Ascent tournament?
Tier X winrate would definitely be a more reliable way to seed teams, and shouldn’t be too hard for WG to implement
I agree with @winter swallow and @thorn shale
Good idea 👍
So many people stat pad their accounts below tier 8. Seems like a logical way to restructure tournaments
Although we know there are some rigging done in x but no system is perfect
I'm not talking that this is the best system ever. May be it will be changed someday. But you shouldn't talk that current system is bad. It's not ideal, sure, but it's not awful as you wrote.
Here’s a perfect example of stat padding and why overall win rate is a bad idea
Career win rate is way over 75%
Tier x win rate is 30% lower...
Mby use ix and x wr if both tier are allowed in the tour
Seeding should be based off the average win rate of the top 7 players on a team in the tier of the tournament
@chilly terrace Please don't get me wrong - I think the current system is GOOD. Certainly, the win rate match making is better than purely random match making , and the strongest-vs-weakest principle is also really good too for early stages in tournaments 😃
It's possible that it will be changed, but do not count on changes in seeding in short term.
Fully understand that potential changes like this take time to discuss (internally at WG) and then more time to implement. But I think the opportunity for players/streamers and WG to discuss informally here is great 👍 Thank you
overall we have gone a good bit ahead on tournaments, with thrilling games and pro commentating. I hope the trend will continue through this season finals 👍 and looking forward to a high class Twister season 😀
Hello everybody, new people greating!
Greetings new people!
@chilly terrace system is good but its can be better
hi
Yes that’s is a great idea to have only the tier winrate of the tournament considered for team winrate. It makes perfect sense and can avoid having sealclubbers getting easy seeds. I am 100% in on that
Oof my seedings then - my very old crappy stats finished me
I wouldn't call it inaccurate - but some of us have dark histories in our career stats - and it really does show
wg can do it last 30 days wr
the more you guys trying to make it accurate - the more you guys will realize the fact that: inorder to make it accurate - would be actually better off considering tournament record rather than random battle records
and oh yeah - Tournament tier is 9-10 so you will also need to consider tier 9 as well (if that makes any sense)
@toxic lintel would actually incentivize comp players to perform consistently at tier 10 in order to help team seeding
Very high IQ
Although it seems WG in no rush to change seeding format
It’s a great idea. I fully approve
And don’t consider tier 9 becuase no one ever plays tier 9 in a tier 10, unless it’s for memes
That and the tier 10 rental tanks for tournaments are the 2 changes I think wg should really consider for the future
and getting crew on 100% with credits or free xp and not only gold
so free to play players can get 100% crew without grinding
i have higher wr on t10 than overall wr xd
My overall is 67ish but my X is 65. I stat pad in Tier vi... well I don’t. That’s the effect though. I just love the easy8 and starchaser.
I dont brag with stats cause they nothinh to brag about and this is about tournaments 😉
Crew xp certificates could be converted to something useful
There’s an 11% difference between my career and 30 day lol
My career is 69.5. My 30 day is like all tier 10 solo so its only 2-3% higher. It aint going anywhere soon :/
Poszukóje chętnych do klanu Polka WALCZONCAPL zchęciom przyjmę każdego chętnego
@thorn shale English only
Am I only one that wotb on steam is crashing after battles
happen 4 times tonight during the tournament
3 rounds in qt in same map
🗯
Hi in French
Hello
I’m Waiting On A Tier 5-6 Tournament.
My Captain Seems To Be Offline
Not ideal lol
I am GKdragon
In Asia server
I want find someone to play tour steady
@fiery falcon use the #tourneys-team-search channel
I want Wargaming to play a tournament, and go through the effort of prepping for one. And see if the current prizes (not professionals) just a average quick tournament or ascent (if you’re really into it) and see if it’s a endeavor worth repeating. Because I can’t seem to find any motivation to win 600k-1m credits in such a time consuming and difficult manner.
Referring to rental tanks, honestly, I believe that people should work for their rewards, and I don’t believe there should be a fast lane access for tournaments at any level. No matter if it improves the tournament tanking population—> especially if they cannot practice in pubs or training rooms. After all, they are unable to practice in a fair and equal environment to everyone else. But if they have the ability to practice, why bother even grinding? Simply having a tank in and for tournaments is not enough anymore. Especially in a med or bc role. But in short, tournaments are the best of what blitz has to offer. People should at the very least, have experience and foundational understanding of what they’re driving to do well in it- at a fundamentally different environment and at a harder level compared to pubs and ratings. However, by doing so- we undercut the work and diligence of other players.
Tier x seeding? Sure, I guess..? I’m okay with the current system. As to stop seal clubbing, if they’re bad at tier x tanks, they won’t be good in tier x tournaments. And I’m not sure what problem it solves, every clan that made top 8 deserved to be there. (At least on na) and they were definitively, some of the best teams that we could offer from probably the best way to match and make the teams.
...
Ok until the last paragraph.
Another issue I've noticed is the minimum amount of players you can put it. My team especially has not been performing at the level we should be because its required to have 5 minimum. If we could play with only 1 I guarantee you we wouldnt lose, but since were playing 4 other noobs with the best player in NA his effectiveness drastically decreases and wdym rolling hated and von both had at least a double digit WR by the end
Duuud I totally agree sometimes I just wanna play by myself in tournaments because I’m just a really war fighter tanker man. When I see that I can’t platoon with 7 players it’s when I do tournaments but it affects my platoon rate in tournaments so I just gotta soldier up and fight by myself or with 4, maybe two.
These pro season teams should have 10-11 player rosters instead of 9
People have school and life to worry about. These are month plus long tournaments. If someone has an emergency and can’t play for half of the season, there’s no reason to punish the team for that
Larger rosters for big events yes. Big yes.
Agree with Raik, also usually you have a larger number than 9 people competing for the spots in the team
10 spots would be amazing, 11 would be even better. An increase in team spots would be very healthy though, imo
@thorn shale - on all servers, there is an arguement that better teams got put out early due to MM. I'm not saying VON and HATED are bad, but I am saying maybe there are better teams that didnt make the cut. Going 1-13 is pretty telling. And that 1 being against another 1-13 team.... I mean.... there's an evident gap.
For example F-B-I and Evil Uniqums deserves Spots in the EU tournament imo
@pale finch did you see how fbi lost to -1-?
Yeah I did... that was so stupid but he has himself to blame for it
there are always teams that deserved to enter top 8 but didn't make the cut - then there are teams that doesn't deserve to get top 8 that got in (I am not saying which particular teams)
maybe should be 8 for NA 6 for asia 12 for eu and 16 teams for RU (in last stage)
No lmaoo
To be fair with Hated, they did beat the #2 pramo team to qualify, (they’re 65%?) which demonstrated the potential for upsets, and if you work hard and achieve win conditions, it the tournament system can work for you. And likewise, getting a bracket in your favor and failing to execute (ie. Win your group) as a pro team in quals is a non issue.
With Von- their tier x stats are comparable with a mid table NA team anyways. So my point was to say, not much would have changed anyways.
Deserved to qualify does not mean they’re the best 8 on the server, because the best 8 are the ones who completed the condition to play at professionals imo.
It’s the elite 8 for a reason
Hated beat a Pramo Latino team that never trained together
Congrats on the win but it’s not a real pramo team
I don’t want to go to far into that at all, but I think both teams deserved their outcomes and that’s where I want to stop
And void 2?
Meets pramo in the first stage
Main reign in the second stage
Tempest
They deserved a spot
Purpl and str8 hit each other both stages
Purpl won stage 1 and the first match up in stage 2. They lost the second double elim and were gone
Purpl and tempest would have been more competitive teams
Both teams that got in are stat padded for wr
Hence the earlier discussion about making the seeding based on the wr of the tournament
The premise I want to focus on is the fact that teams like Hated and VON met the objectives that qualifiers required. So did pramo, void and reign. As a result, they deserved to be there. Regardless of the fact they had a 1-13 winrate in the actual games.
I admit, the possible best 8 teams do not get to represent the tournament- and while that is a shame, I don’t think there is any possible method from Wargaming, including tier x statistics as a factor in matchmaking to solve that. It’s been the case every year and every time, the top 8 teams before prof or quals aren’t necessarily guaranteed a spot, which is healthy. If teams like VON slide in there with god tier group 2 meta, I’m more than okay with that.
The thing is that the perfect 8 will never truly exist
And did Hated stat pad?
Compare the clans at tier x win rate
Kk
Many players get their wr from playing a far higher percentage in tiers 7-8 with op premium tanks
It’s not done intentionally
Oh
Very true, tempest is by far a better team than hated and von but got cucked by mm
Theres always going to be a weak team but going 1-13??
Biggest problem is wotb on steam crashed every tour battle yesterday, it was quick tour so I didnt care if we lose
And it started few days ago, boom after every battle it crashes
Also we are forgetting the qualifiers were Bo3 which was not an ideal format.
@thorn shale don’t forget Def
Hello there!
Based on players reports which we have received recently, we have audited teams, which are participants of Professionals Tournament, for fair play. Unfortunately, during our investigation, we found out that one team had demonstrated unsportsmanlike conduct.
We count that the fair play is vital in tournaments. Therefore we have to announce that team [EZ-] ALL STAR will be deprived of prize fund due unsportsmanlike conduct. The PRO avatars will be withdrawn from their accounts as well. Also the following players from this team will be banned for participation in major tournaments until the 31st of December 2019:
• VALKR1E
• EUSEBIO_SLB
• VIP
• DEKAV1L
• Ahajdu_
• Grgori95
Prizes for the 4th place in the final stage and prizes for the 4th place in the group stage will be provided to the team which ranks 5th in the group stage.
Prizes for the 5th place in the group stage will be provided to the team which ranks 6th, prizes for the 6th place to 7th etc.
hmmm
oof
Took ya whole nek
why did they get striped off their reward?
Good job WG, thanks.
Finally some justice was created, I’ve been working hard for this
Very good job to the WG tournament staff and the rest of the EU community will surely be thankful
Kudos to WG for listening to the community and undertaking a serious investigation. This was probably quite a lot of work from their end and I am very impressed with their professionalism.
Thanks to Zird also, very good job with this case 👍
What happened ?
lol rekt, they shared acc
tbh I would give longer ban because isnt twister only major tour this year?
Getting a ban through Twister season is a big penalty for a serious Blitz esports player.
Sets an example. Well done WG
I think these penalties are effective and balanced. They send a very clear message and it is encouraging to see WG flexing its capabilities and enforcing the EULA. Emphasis on the EULA. Read it. Know it. Abide by it.
I think a ban until December isn't enough tho
I suppose that makes them miss out on twister cup
Not doing anything would have been letting the wolfpack out
next time use VPN kids
Idk ban lenght is fair in my opinion, cause in sports there is similar bans for doping etc
Yea mby
But it's ok as said it means they miss out on twister which is the biggest event
also it sets an example
Yes
Indeed
maybe put it in NEWS in game so everyone can see it xD
@azure void I don't think you can prove it with screenshots
Hehe
An 8 month ban through the next major event (with no prior precedent for such actions by WG) sets an example but isn't harsh. The offending players can still enjoy other aspects of the game and return to competitive play in 2020.
@green sierra cheat avatar also
they can play twister on othere acc because it prob ban wont stop them
That they have to use and can't change
idk what happened in EU but it seems it's something that is pretty bad and they got stripped avatars as well ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Account sharing
they shared acc @silver vapor
For tournament
Detective Zird at your service
ban
what are they earning by sharing accounts tho
screenshot
lol
Lmao
Seems legit
I’d like to hear that
That’s epic
@green plover
Dang, must be fun to tag wrong peep and get away without a mute or a ban
dont mute me ploz
Meadsy69#3126 has been warned.
Ban
Don't wanna try that one
oof
3lmeri#1451 has been warned.
keep this channel for tournament discussion only
Stormblade#4404 has been warned.
oof who tagged this party killer, @neon thistle did you?
It was the other guy
@green sierra this isn't general chatter,
You have seen other people get warned for being off topic and you still decide to chat off topic'
@pale finch justice
Damn right
poor that t22 med guy
Juka J.#8812 was muted
@azure void yea?
@green plover rumours has it you play on all 7 accs
At same time. Whilst commanding yourself
Moe exposed
Unfortunately that’s true
Lol
reported
Already done
You see. We have unreliable players like Tj who can’t show up
@azure void our secret to success has been exposed
tj too busy
Lol
Actually moe only plays on six he can’t do donuts like tj
^
That last account is just a prank
or donuts like you @slender goblet
Its ok if you lose.. can always blame RNG
:dab
hides
What donuts; you did two I did 8k games
EU community will be thankful 😂
Enforce your rules sir moderator @thorn shale
i bet more than just eu community
Alright let’s go back to talking about #tourneys-discussion in tournament channel and no more side chatter
No one is thankful really, they are just getting hated for
Moe for Tjs moderator role
^
hope to spark some discussion with this
I am guessing that everyone is talking about Asian teams spamming IS-4 excessively
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/553889019096727552/569562590716362753/2z493c.jpg
Or just Asian teams generally having next to no mobility lol
I mean - it worked earlier for us ¯_(ツ)_/¯
im glad is4 spam is moving away in eu
Plox, make it happen in asia
I threw IS-4 based spam into the strats during Twister cup - so I'd thought it would still work
Asia moving to NA moving to EU moving to RU metas from what I can see.
Ironically, when you are deep in the RU meta, the pure EU meta is the perfect counter for it. The pure RU meta though trumps hybrid EU/RU metas.
¯_(ツ)_/¯
The trick is being flexible and knowing your opponents in detail, before the games start.
@fathom tiger now its E50M spam
But as soon as E50M spam gets too prevalent, the counters will come out. That is how a meta should work. There is a paradigm. A counter evolves and then becomes the new paradigm.... then a counter evolves.... ad infinitum
The problem emerges when no counter can be found. Then a rebalance is required to fix the situation. Case in point - Russian mediums late 2016.
Does anyone know what exactly happened with the account sharing
R u acc sharing 😉
they shared accounts throughout the clan/friends during the top 8 into top 4 and got banned simple.
Definately right decision and penalty from WG tournament team.
Lets keep Blitz CW honest and fair 👍👍👍👍
press F for -1- they where 1 point behind EZ if they didnt share acc -1- could have been in top 4
But they got the rewards of top 4 now I guess.
If it was allowed to share accounts there wouldnt be only 9 spots free
Just make these big tournaments with 11 slots and cal it a day
I don’t care if my prizing is less
I don’t play for prizing
Agree
Same here Raik, I would definitely support that
Some of the account sharing is due to scheduling. Others are to legitimately rigging games by putting better players on a lesser player’s account
i think option number 2 happened,puting better players to replace bad players,and some of replacements as well for schedule,i heard they took more then 4 accos that noone played
damn, that's bad
But it´s not rare that clans put clan-accounts in such tournament teams instead of a player account.
Ofc EZ- did it too hard. But shared accounts are not that rare.
i really get account sharing when people are unavailable but when it's people changing even though everyone is there that's just sad, I mean atleast let the guys that are in the team play, they earned it (if I am understanding the situation right)
Hey are u speaking about my report?
I guess they are
I just say I am a big gay if we are the only ones who shared his account. So I just hope if they ban me they also ban all players who shared/share his account
@chilly terrace Sir can you look private message please?
hmm can a clan have tournament accounts? not using acc from someone else but using acc that no one uses as main acc
damn IMMOR 3 teams for tomorrows tour
I wish I have this kind of squad depth lmao
only know a few people in "forthelols" but haven't seen any amazing leaders in any teams (unless some new guys appeared while i wasn't playing)
its hard to find some leader, most of players dont know how to get 7 players in a team
XD
many amazing people left after twister
EROS and R2K are trying but RA1D is still winning
Bring TomasBack!
as i remember ascent tourny is another chance to get into the world finals
dictator tomas, and no
Yea
Offline finals havent been announced tho
¯_(ツ)_/¯ maybe there are none this time
isnt pro tour for twister cup, 1st place goes in minsk?
eros is probably still fighting in between itself as it used to when I was there, r2k are r2k and ra1d are very serious about things
🤔
pro tourny atleast last year was for mobile legends or whatever, and last year pramo won ❤
that's the problem in eros that's why the f*ck up 🙂
Is CWs usually mixed control s?
Grande finale gonna be between ra1d and r2k i believe and the games between them have been close calls every single time
for bigger tournies it's only touch @winged anchor
yea all went in tie breaker
😐well that puts me out
ra1d is somewhat a traditional team they are used to traditional tactics and are really strong in them but they can get fked when faced with experimental ones (but those don't always go as planned)
Ima pc noob but i was still playing in there
¯_(ツ)_/¯ nothing can stop you
IS4
I’m hopeless when I try on a phone
hue PNCR tactics send in is7s and is4s
we have SOULS in EU that do heavy spam also
Lol. PNCR still does 140 rushes
140 rushes are coming back in eu
i mean many things are viable if you play well and are coordinated
140(/t22med for those who has them)
PNCR lost to RGN last week. They only did med rushes
Curious to see what happens in the day of professional's tournament
T22s. Still say it’s unfair
T22?
At least not make it obvious. It seems to me that this would be hard to control
The fact that t-22s are not evenly available.
It is hard to control and I am surprised on how it got out lmao (is T22 a new test tank?
The Russian medium tank from Christmas??? Where have you been
I haven't played for 6 months so it's a premium tank I see
Eh the same situation when m60 was given out, it was the new meta for a bit because other meds got nerfed
M60 had very high heat pene. It’s no longer used much because they made it same as m48
I was always against high tier prems
@green sierra Where do you see these stats please ?
I thought so but it isn't assistant (unless ios) and not same WR
I think people say T-22 medium is unfair because they simply don't have it. You almost never see them in random battles, so no one can whine about it being so hard to play against because it's a rare sight. You see them in Professionals Tournament, and a lot of the teams with the most T-22s have fallen short of victory despite having an "unfair advantage". I would understand all the whining about "unfair" if it was spammed everywhere and actually was invincible. Has everyone forgot that the IS-4 still exists and is completely free in the tech tree? 😂
I mean common it's Blatantly better in a lot of situations compared to other meds at tier 10 😂 @peak terrace
Is it though? I mean sure, armor is great when you're hiding your weak spots, but other than that, what's better? 🤔
Idk I don't have it but that armor is pretty good to say the least and in certain situations and on certain maps it's really really good to say the least and would certainly prefer it over the other ones at tier 10 @peak terrace
As we are in the #tourneys-discussion section, I was expecting some better argument for the T-22 being overpowered and unfair. A lot of competitive play, especially for mediums, happens to be brawls towards the end game of the match. T-22 is massive. It's an easy target in brawls and isn't hard to pen because the armor isn't invincible. Frontally, it isn't that impressive. Angling the front makes the armor weaker too. Side armor isn't much different, it becomes flat and the side profile of the T-22 is like I mentioned, massive.
I completely understand the whole "certain situations" or "positions" on maps, but I have yet to see a team dig themselves into such positions and sit there flinging HEAT at each other from range. Most games like I mentioned, end up in brawls and I don't see how T-22s massive size is an advantage.
If you let the T-22 reverse sidescrape against you, then you’re in trouble. But reverse sidescraping is such a weak tactic imo.
i think t22 problem is v shaped front
It doesn’t even matter if the t-22 under performed. That is not the point. The point is hosting a professional tournament and not giving the teams the same deck of cards
Side of t22 bounce more than is7s side
has sense,i think with too op colector tanks wich everyone cant buy fair play of tours is in danger,who knows how many more of those like tanks are yet to come
@winged anchor Why is this complaint happening just now? Same deck of cards? So if I don't have the JagPz E100 and the enemy team does, I should start complaining because I don't have the "same deck of cards"? Interesting. (:
Point is anyone can grind/pay for jag e100 today if they really want it
Are you really so naive dude?/ Anyone can grind a tech tree tank
The question should be: why are people only bringing it up now since limited time premiums have been a thing since the beginning of tier 8 tourneys.
Okay, fair point. Where was everyone whining about "same deck of cards" when 121B and Mk.6 were released? 🤔
Read panda’s second note. M60 was brought up for a limited time only because it was actually pretty broken. After that it was largely forgotten.
The tanks that actually have been for sale players actually had a fair chance to buy them. All tanks that are used at tier 10 have been,or are equally available except for t-22 and the American tier 10 that where in christmas event
Wait, what? Are you okay?
Anyone with enough money had an equal chance of getting the T-22 medium. T-22 was more guaranteed than any container tank such as 121B or the Mk.6 which WG released. 😂
So if you consider spending 400$ a fair chance. Then you are endorsing P2W into tournaments
"The tanks that actually have been for sale players actually had a fair chance to buy them."
T-22 actually has been for sale, players actually had a fair chance to buy them. 100% chance actually, and not 5% like other previously sold Tier 10s.
Any prem tier 10 is inherently "unfair"
by definition of if I am a free to play, it should be in my grasp to acquire.
I wouldn't say that if it was for sale for a reasonable amount and time
But it promotes P2W which I will rail against all day long
Also. wait for the day when every serious team will HAVE TO GO BUY A TANK TO BE ON THE TEAM
So then ban all or ban none. Who dictates "reasonable amount"? A person making 6 figs can see T-22 acquisition price as reasonable. A high school student will see $50 as unreasonable.
Your issue isn't about Tier X tanks being sold. Your issue is them being sold for a price above what you consider fair.
Seems like it. Which I don't understand.
bcs m60 and chief and 121 are not good enough
beyond a normal persons reach and availability
at least nobody is useing them
And compete in professional tournaments
Yeah and? People with T-22s don't all see success. Your point is?
point is that m60=patton(identical almost),chieftain(not much usable coz e5 2x better),121B(no need to comment) and t22 is superior to most med tanks on 1on1
People "against" prem/collectors tanks can't band together under one point, it's so mixed that it's hard to understand the real reason for why they are unfair. Even though the answer is simple.
^^^ 😂
read above there is fair points
No, that's entirely subjective.
counterquestion,why nobody uses those in tours but they use t22?
T-22 has the advent of having a strong turret. If you're using them in tours for the side armor then I laugh at you.
Where is TJ when you need him....
i never said i used them for side armour?
I said exactly why people use them in tours.
it has great dpm,it has op turret,best frontal,at least most trolish from all meds,low profile tank,very fast one also
Its irrelevant if it was a Cromwell with a tier 10 sticker. You understand my point very clearly. You chose to defend WGing here for whatever reason idk when its clear that you play in a very competitive clan. Why are you promoting P2W is what Id like to know. Are you gonna start a charity drive soon to fund your teams tanks? @peak terrace
DPM same as 140, frontal armor no better than 140, profile same as 140, slower than 140. Again, the difference is the turret armor
i saw noobs beating real good players 1v1 in those things
no matter wich tank much much better player would pick
How is T-22 P2W though? I'm having a hard time finding the W because all I see is a bunch of L's from clans who spam T-22s.
Cuz he lost to one
I'm not even defending the T-22. If I had one I wouldn't play it in tours unless the situation called for turret armor. The gun handles much much worse than a 140 and it's slower than a 140.
Which again, is exactly what I said originally. Turret is the use for it.
we all know it eats 140 for breakfast
^
find someone who has it and take 140 and try,u will see
Well then, it's a good thing competitive isn't 7 1v1s then, huh? 😂
If you say so. I'm pretty done with this t-22 iS bEst mEdIum thing.
it just says that the tank is better xD
Hated and TJ did 1 v 1s with 140 and T-22. Both players averaged 3300+ in their tanks. It was exactly equal
if lower skills players can beat better ones
Part of me wishes all the people complaining got the T-22 so they could attempt to get the W in their "P2W" statement in Professionals.
Lets wait for that is4 defender for 1000 pounds and lets continue this talk then
its not total replacement but it brings something new,and you shouldnt say bad words in normal discuson,if u want go try 1v1 against t22
take whatever tank u wish and see how it goes pick some bad player also
It brings something new. Huh, now we are getting to the root issue with premium tanks.
but its just opinions,all can have theirs 😃
It's not like I said what the root issue with premium tanks is a week ago or something. People getting red-eyed over the T-22 are only seeing 1/10th of the issue and are blind to everything else. I don't care about your opinion about the T-22 because one, it's based on anecdote and two, because it matters jack squat in the grand scheme of the argument.
@sudden shadow a few minutes ago you tried proving your opinion by telling me an inferior player in T-22 will beat a superior player in 140 in a 1v1.
well u can care or not,thats your right i just said what i think 😃
The grand scheme of the argument. Yes. This is what's important, prem tanks bring something new. This something new could be vital to a strategy that would otherwise be sub-par given the tech tree set of tanks. As such, there is something inherently "unfair" about that. The root issue with premiums is that, not "oH pRemiUms aRe sO oP reeeee", it's what I said above.
@vague obsidian shhhhhh.
Tan tan if you could read you might understand some of the argument. Shame.
@flat goblet i think you’re expecting too much
I'm not even defending T-22. I'm pointing out that T-22 itself isn't the issue, it's the nature of prem Xs as a whole.
i understand,i gave various views and i think my arguments were fair
but it does not matter,its how it is,im happy with the game as it is 😃
hi
This is getting old.
WG, give us an actual OP tier X collector. I would love to see everyones reactions.
i would love to see WG’s bank account if they gave us something like that. lol
Extra thicc
Can we stop bringing up pointless arguments that was ended weeks ago 😂 I thought we already made up a solution regarding to tier 10 collectors
Is4 defender pls
Let’s get back to the topic
×8
Tournament channel. If you are going to debate premium vehicles you must link it back to tournaments somehow pls lol
T22 is not op enough in tournaments pls buff
I am going to start pronouncing it Levi after the jeans company.
D: Larry plsssssss
@keen oar mwuahahahahahaha
_Larry was taken I had no choice reeee@winter swallow
L4RRY
or you could have gone for LarReeee - which would be great fun to call as a caster.
Pointless arguing. T22 regardless of whether you think it’s thicc or not make rental system to give everyone chance to use it end of discussion
And also get the tier winrates for major tournaments sorted so we avoid another VON
Korah has exceeded maximum permitted efficiency levels.
Well we saw wg step out of its normal comfort zone and actually listen to players and banning ez. If we are direct with them they will listen 😃
Huge kudos to wg for that btw.
Not saying I disagree with your point but for WG from a financial point it's better for them I believe to keep the t22 as a pay to win tank that can't be rented . At least currently if the tank isn't rentable then that means that tourny players with the cash are at least forced to buy it if they deem it neseccsary (if they do sell it in the future ) . If they give it out as a rental tank they don't really profit from it financially . Yes it could improve eSports in blitz but I doubt eSports in blitz really provided alot of revenue to WG. Again I actually agree with the point but im just pointing out that making it a rental tank means players could lose any incentive to buy the tank outright if they only use it for tournaments . @winter swallow @toxic lintel
Here’s the thing about what you’re saying. Playing high level comp takes a ton of dedication, mostly in terms of time. When wg starts introducing these fantastic tanks badger, t22, future is4 defender for hundreds of dollars this makes the most dedicated players in comp become forced to buy into these expensive premiums. Players in comp already dedicate time outside their lives for the game, it’s not fair to force them to dedicate their wallet to be on equal ground with other teams. So yes maybe this benefits wg short term but in the long run it’s gonna drive a lot of players who can’t afford those tanks away from comp
Obviously the problem with t22 is small as of right now, not a lot of people have it but overtime things will get worse so this is why we wanna find solutions now rather than later
And also rental doesn’t mean we get to keep it. At least keep it rental for major tourneys. Obviously majority of players will want to buy the tanks to play in pubs so financially this is a good move. What’s even better actually is that this will drive he tourney participation even higher, as a lot of players will want to try out these tanks in tourneys. Higher participation in tourneys is always a good thing for wg and it comes at a relatively low price of introducing limited rental tanks for short time
And of course once players enjoy playing these tanks, they’re gonna be enlightened to buy them and play them in pubs. So win win for wg
That last point you said is actually very good and I hadn't thought about it . It would be quite benificial for tourny participation and interest .However the thing is that since it only will apply to major tournaments I'm not sure how much interest it will generate because in most servers the clans that are top 8 will be their regardless and also some players will probably only try and use the tanks when they get it for free without having to spend .
Maybe have it for all tournaments then. This will be very appealing to the average player
P2W creep is what I fear in terms of esports viability for Blitz. At the moment the number of tanks which are OP and available only for $$$ is relatively low, and the number of owners of these at the top level is almost inconsequential.
A tank rental system using both in-game currencies and $$$ prevents a scenario where a group of players with a lot of $$$ but lower skill levels, beat a team with less $$$ but higher skill levels.
Tournament winner MUST be based on skill, not depth of wallet.
I mean 10 million credits rental would still probably mean the average player needs to buy a premium tank and have some form of premium time. Or have saved up a lot of credits. Probably means some form of income for wg
Maybe have the rental based on how big the tourney is, so for random quick tourneys rental could be 2-3 million. Spring season 4 million credits or something and major tourneys 10 million. Obviously major tourney you get the tank for a week so price is higher and the 2-3 million for quick tourney prevents excessive spamming of the tank
And yes I agree 100% tournament winners need to be based on skill not depth of wallet
hi
more t22s kinda tanks to tier 10
my opinion hope i can, you know use my wallet to get em all
just kidding, that is lil bit sarcastic you can use t22 med on the pro tournies.
@leaden belfry tagging you to see your roles
@winter swallow tagging you to see my roles
not even a veteran
😦
only the cool kids don't have veteran
Who is veteran
me
not me
I think a role for professionals tournament participants could be nice. Or like a general esports role for players with over a certain number of tournament battles?
give me recognition
I can't pay with paysafecard in world of tanks :c
@thorn shale Not in this channel
i don't even know what you are saying here @thorn shale so unrelated to tournament please go somewhere else
@thorn shale This is tournaments thread. You are looking for another channel, let me help find it for you.
Maybe use #570204768857882624 / #560057192640937994 / @thorn shale 😃 ?
Thx and sorry
No worries - good luck with the query.
@flat goblet Where do you see these stats please ?
that's either world of tanks blitz assistant or in the portal
Find the issue in this picture 🙃
Epic , encounter battle
@chilly terrace I haven't seen Encounter tournaments since 1st twister cup - and this is definitely something fresh 😂
@fathom tiger on the portal ye ty
lol
@silver vapor is that from an actual tournament? Was it played as encounter?
Apparently yes
Thanks to clanmates
@winter swallow I guess they are secretly testing encounter mode again 😂
encounter in tourney ... strange
wow.
Now THAT, is interesting! Encounter as a game mode though for CW is very, well - hang on - there's a great tactical break down blog from Twister 2016. That explains the meta (which hasn't evolved since 2016, early 2017) better than I can.
lol
O no
We had encounter back in 2017 I think, in the eu community based map war (remember well cause we had Rockfield over and over)
Well the site is broken - but it was Ferd Squad - Twister Cup Analysis . There was a series of 9 really, really GOOD articles.
Encounter is boring , it's just gonna be camp off again
Or 2016? Idk
Twister Cup Analysis Part 1: Tankfist - posted in General Discussion:
Link to Part 1 of a series analyzing strategy and game play from the Twister Cup.
https://ferdsquad.com/2016/12/05/twister-cup-analysis-part-1-tankfist/
Summary
The best exponents of Tankfist r...
How to break every single team now - turn supremacy into encounter
http://forum.wotblitz.eu/index.php?/topic/35748-twister-cup-analysis-part-2-iron-zone/
http://forum.wotblitz.eu/index.php?/topic/35992-twister-cup-analysis-part-4-heavy-platoon/
http://forum.wotblitz.com/index.php?/topic/72515-twister-cup-analysis-final-part/
etc.
Twister Cup Analysis Part 2: Iron Zone - posted in Gameplay:
Second part of a series analyzing tactics and strategies on display in the Twister Cup finals.
The Iron Zone
https://ferdsquad.com/2016/12/07/twister-cup-analysis-part-2-iron-zone/
Summary
Stated simp...
Twister Cup Analysis Part 4: Heavy Platoon - posted in Gameplay:
Part 4 in a series analyzing strategy and tactics on display in the Twister Cup finals.
https://ferdsquad.com/2016/12/13/twister-cup-analysis-part-4-heavy-platoon/
Summary
Far from being fossilize...
Twister Cup Analysis- final part - posted in General Discussion:
Last post of overly long rumination on Twister 2016. Includes rabid speculation on the future of competitive Blitz.
https://ferdsquad.com/2017/02/13/twister-cup-analysis-part-8b-ruminations/
But the blooming links are BROKEN. He had a proper good dissection of the encounter meta. Iron Fists, Iron Webs, etc. - it was glorious.
Asia after seeing encounter in tourney
"Bring back 2016 meta bois"
A mixed meta would leverage more balance between teams.
Imagine the Professionals Tournament but half encounter, half supremacy in the Round Robin phase. OMG.
Oof
personally what i think on ecounter would happen is either just a stand off against hulldown tanks and campers or a one sided rush,
atleast from when I used to play cw what would happen is both teams cap bases and one has the advantage in cap points forcing the other team to rush, the rush usually would happen at around 800 cap points so by the time people are fighting the cap points are really close to 1000 and either a kill or a stopping of cap would result in victory. This was or still is the most common occurrence in CW
@sharp token yes, encounter was pretty stagnant on some maps. The iron-web 2016 strat was literally just set a trap and wait for enemy to fall into it.... but the teams and players are so advanced now compared to then, the growth of strategic depth in the last 3 years is insane.... I think that the simplistic iron web, iron fist approaches of 2016 would get countered hard.
The issue in Blitz is you need motivation to move out of cover. That motivation is ALWAYS a target. Either an enemy, cap points, map control etc. - and each of those in relation to one another.
Encounter doesn't have much motivation to move, to control the map - it is easy to reset the cap. It strongly favours teams that achieve solid defensive positions and decent lanes of vision in relation to team location.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9LHaDk_7g8&t=28121s - Russian restream.
b-b-b-b-b-bushka
^ but that is the whole blooming thing. 9 hours. NINE. HOURS.
Then you have the Tokoyo Game Show 2017 which came next - and that was the first (?) offline with Supremacy - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSa8-XzTQ2A
On Tokyo Game Show 2017 teams that made it to the BLITZ GAME SHOW Finals: X-Range consisting of masayasu (captain), kirihit, newt, Angelic_Howl, Flash447, SH...
Note XR in that and now in top 4 Asia Pro Tour 2019 😄 I knew I recognised that tag from somewhere lol
Tho they missed twister last year because they got booted by some random team, just saying
Yeh I heard that team just got really lucky tho
Asia teams have a tendency to screw up quite a lot in times and being quite inconsistent
😉 . slow mode killin me RN.
speaking from personally and from experience
Yeah slow mode sucks 😑😒
i hope they do attack and deff mods same like wot pc
@thorn shale you can probably expand it to former competitors, say former offlines and twister onlines as well
XR also came 2nd in the 2017 Asia Twister Cup .
T22 is much better than 140 by far
#tank-balance-discussion @stark crow
Sorry @thorn shale
just gonna say this, nice tour name deserves to be removed from tonights tour
Heh. @neon thistle wanna tell him about our bet lmao
No u tell him @atomic tartan
I would but then I’d have to call him a
Oh
👀
?
Nvm
@silver vapor it was a bug. We've fixed it already. There will not encounter battles anymore)
😜 I was thinking that you guys might have been planning to reintroduce encounter into the tournaments
top cw tanks? ping when u answer thansk
@pallid raven 😇
lol
We were lucky enough
which one were you in? "forthelols"
Our enemies played all really well so hats off 👍
@thorn shale IS-4,IS-7,WZ-113,OBJ 268, Foch,E3,new Chinese TD, M48 Patton,e50M, All Russian meds, STB-1, Bat Chat. I’m sure you could add a few more. I’m very happy to say I’m seeing a little more diversity compared to last year. I believe some tanks like FV215B can also fill a niche as well as Jageroo.
grille is also used to boost to certain spots. Ik the e50m is used in tourneys but I dont really like it. I dont feel like there is any spot in a map where the e50m would be best at although it is good at a lot of spots which makes it great in pub stomping
I wouldn't say the Chinese TDs are part of the meta yet
Also amx 50b for the meme 1200 potential
We use 4 t57 heavys on a map which will remain nameless
We used 4 amx on Mayan in prof
Most tanks are competitive. 2 or 3 get used more than once in a set.
*cough* IS-4 *cough*
jag was used
183 on yamato harbor was the meta
Jag is solid on a few maps for sure
Idk I like the way the meta is heading atm, moving further away from slow heavies such as is4
It's been "moving away" from slow heavies for 8 months.
Depends on how you look at it, I would beg to differ because comparing the playstyle of teams in the challenge the stars tourney to how they play now a huge difference is noticeable in lineups etc
Nothing changed on NA lol. literally the same strats and tanks for as I said the last half a year
not true
at least for us
Oh that's right, the T-22 is now a thing
🤔
I was speaking of EU, idk about the other regions
Everything has already been done. The stagnation is ridiculous. Same win condition or smaller goal, different tanks. You could probably blind fire half the HP away from a team on some maps at this point
you do you I guess, lol
creativity is noice
And you keep sending batchats around the entire map and baiting with IS-4s :)
I don't think you've paid a whole lot of attention then
Horrible analysis but sure lol
I don't pay attention to the meme games
I don't think you've paid attention to any games besides a select few of yours if you really think that
Besides, if the stagnation were in fact ridiculous, meaning the enemy would be extremely predictable, then you should be able to develop some good counter. The counter would then force the enemy to change as well.
Every team is predictable in their positioning, but they are equally experienced. Countering is such a silly thing, since if it's even a little bit wrong it's an auto loss
Every team is predictable in their positioning, but they are equally experienced.
Ok. Sure, you could say every team is 'predictable' in the sense that you can 'predict' their goals for the battle and assume what they will do. But you could do that for pretty much any lineup.
Don’t say it
Don’t say it
Don’t say it
.
.
.
.
Most teams have line ups designed to flex in any direction
Crap
But you probably know where they are flexing to so
Sure. If you’re watching a streamer
Yes, you should be able to predict, that's half of the game.
You guys actually accusing someone of streamsniping?
Predictions aren't going to always be 100% right as they are still guesses based on "facts and logic"
Right. That's why they are predictions, and that's why I say comp isn't 'stagnant'.
In fact, it's never been better
If comp rotations were predictable, there’d be no point of pushing
They are predictable, that's why you push in the first place
I don’t see what you’re trying to prove
Apparently comp is easy
They are predictable, the issue is setting up correctly. Knowing what the enemy is going to attempt to do isn't difficult, it's the how
Everything about comp is the how. The game's essence is simple.
Everything is easy on paper but it gets hard when u start fighting
Hence why it’s a rotation based game and doesn’t really allow static gameplay
For some time, yes, NA meta was based around relatively static positions. But it has moved way past that for many maps.
Yeah same as EU, when we were champs last spring season we usually relied on very static and slow paced gameplay
I am not catching up this conversation - Asia is obviously very behind
I wouldn't know what asia is up to since there haven't been streams.
I’ve watched most of amaunet’s streams, it’s... spicy
@flat goblet probably still stuff that you guys were doing during last year twister - or even 2017 stuff from XR
Amaunet streamed/streams asia?
Yes she does
going to have to look into that then, could be some good stuff
all I can see from chat is zird yelling and screaming at the lineups being too heavy
Don’t get your hopes up :^)
👀
Meanwhile some of my members has been nagging me to use their strats (which are obviously copied from EU and RU)
I am not a big fan of copying strats and meta without knowing what they mean - and with respects to my skill level the things I can understand is fairly limited - hence the horrible display of our super stiff lineups 😬
@bold kettle explain how are comp rotations predictable?
When*
lmfao i rewatched RGN vs Void on Faust. both teams literally moved tanks back and forth between opposite sides of the map, with very valid reasons for doing so each and every move. how's that for static gameplay
And that's only the most recent set of games on one map
slow meta in asia theres not much creativity considering is 4 spam is plenty
Compare blitz cw to chess. There are not that many starting positions or type of soldiers. But after 2-3 moves the options grow or gets more limited depending on enemy moves. In the end the player wins who can think a bit ahead
The NA meta has definitely gotten a lot less static, especially at the higher levels. The top 4 teams in the professionals tournament are all easily very capable of easily dislodging the old static, campy meta that used to be dominant about a year ago
Smh the meta where I dominated
@keen oar rip Reaction metas
Best thing about current meta is that every class has viable and specific roles and also most tanks are used even if rarely. Would anyone contest that the FV4202 is the least used tank in Tier X comp scene though?
By least used I mean I have not seen one taken in serious match this season...
everyone's just too noob 🙂
The 4202 doesn't have any specific advantages to leverage in comp, I believe.
i hope they change it to centaurion AX
They could make FV4202 a collector tank and bring in the AX as the tech tree.
Centurion AX won’t be any better IMO
Slow, unreliable turret, paper hull
At least that how it is on WoT PC
The turret's main construction material of damp cardboard is basically what holds this thing back.
And the speed
i like it in wot pc, and turret is biggest thing.
top speed of 50 isn't bad. It's also quite nimble.
fv to ix and cent ax to x.
But if they buff the turret and HESH stays as is, then you wouldn't see the M60, M48 or STB-1 ever again.
never forget HESH
hesh is nice. i like fv now
HESH works in pub matches because noobs. In comp combined with the turret, it isn't enough to operate effectively. You will trade poorly most of the time.
You think a RA1D or R-2-K med will show any part of it you can pen with HESH? Nope.
you can snipe with 202 🙂 and when rushing you are able to kill TD's and other stuff faster
True. But then you snipe with the leo and rotate faster.
don't ruin my dreams 😢
Or you snipe with grille and hit harder. i think the poor 4202 is just always beaten by other tanks for any role atm. Which is a shame. It is one of my favourite Tier X tanks.
@thorn shale you make 202 the new meta
And the proof is in the pudding. The 4202 just isn't taken by pro clans in evenly matched contests.
@sharp token inb4 we have an omega bhink strat we saving for Grand Finals with 3 4202s
👀
is4 buff needed
But alas I’m afraid our rotations might be predictable
^ that is not ruled out. Let the meta go so far away from it that it becomes viable.
is7 buff
Also. Speaking of meta rotations. There's a great YouTube channel on esports. They did a lovely video on tilt. I find link.
I'll post link on my server. It's not PG rated.
I remember when in LGN we did a full FV start, as in 183s 215b's and 202s
^ I will look favourably upon pro teams that use nation based teams in early phases of qualifiers wit hstrongest weakest MMs
I remember a forum post on NA with someone making a clan that would run only american tanks
Krk had french tank 3x3 tour in autumn
Japanese vehicle focused esports team most viable.
yeah that was pretty cool also
i remember the days when community organized tournaments were lit like the 7x68 system
@thorn shale If you want Omega thonk tactics - this video - draw parallels - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzzwPcxyJik - For Blitz, it makes pretty good sense this part :
Dr. Darold Higa, Narrative Designer for World of Tanks Mercenaries, continues his discussion to talk about some of the choices that set the context for armor...
he does look like a strategist
He worked the US Army in their Mil Sims....
"Strategy is limited by the resources at hand" - This should be stapled to the brains of 95% of comp team callers and strat makers. Both in terms of their rosters player skill levels and tank compositions available.
Though I think now with more years under the belt, there are less teams with players who only have a select number of tanks? Or maybe I am wrong. I mentioned it before but I will mention it again - it can be very frustrating juggling players and tanks for strats on certain maps lol - and having rerolls or players with limited tank unlocks can severely handicap a team in terms of flexibility and options.
On the other hand, it was always nice being the guy with every tank unlocked lol because even if you weren't the best player technically - a caller would often draw on you in certain lineups.
I can totally relate to that quote - I've been in countless situations in the past where we had to beat enemy with other methods because simply the skill level and tank compositions was an issue for the team
needless to say - it's hard to achieve when you have such a disadvantage, but we did manage to pull it off a few times
$
That would be mad!
#MakeMadGamesTournamentHappen2019
@chilly terrace - in all seriousness, I do propose a Mad Games esports show match between 2 teams invited by WG 😃 - just to demonstrate proof of concept and get a feeling for audience approval etc.
Mad Games mode isn't available for tournaments. As a suggestion for the future we could think about this.
I'd love to see more tournaments with interesting rules, I am a big fan of the 7x68 mode which forces you to play either 6 tier Xs and 1 tier 8 or 5 tier Xs and 2 tier 9s
Mad games sounds really fun I couldn't imagine what you could come up with for tactics with all of those abilities
We had a 7x68 tournament on NA yonks ago, they aren't really all that great tbh as the only viable tier 8 was a T49 and the tier 9's aren't that great up against tier 10 but it still made for some interesting tactics to be used. Personally wouldn't wanna see that format come into a tournament though
I actually agree with Kiwi, I believe that there are some interesting concepts that can be used in tournaments, I remember previously there was a tournament organized as Kiwi mentioned where you could only have “ 68 as value “ meaning that you are forced to use one tier 8 or 2 tier 9s, it allows some dynamic and fun gameplay, obviously it’s not something that should be considered for any competitive tournaments like the professional tournament, twisters etc but as something fun to do in between rather than just playing quick tournaments for 800k credits or whatever you get when you win :))
Quick tours are a vaste of a time
Huh, for us here in EU ru 251 and tier 9 amx's were the meta with 7x68 @mental yarrow
Personally I don’t enjoy the quick tournaments and usually don’t play them, I prefer organizing a training with another team instead as it’s more giving if your goal is to improve your gameplay, tactics etc.
6 mil per week tournament flashbacks
Yeah it was great fun when the tournaments were more rewarding to play, the participation between competitive clans was also way higher but now because of the mediocre rewards most competitive clans resort to training rather than tournaments. If WG brought back the bronze/silver/gold tournament concept and made the rewards higher again the tournament participation would definitely increase and that would most likely mean that the interest in competitive gameplay would increase for streams etc since more players would be familiar with the concept of tournaments etc @chilly terrace
( Tagged you because I indirectly suggested to bring the concept of bronze/silver/gold tourneys back as they were before with similar rewards to increase interest in tournaments again. ).
that was the golden age of tournaments 🤤
Premium tanks up for grabs as stream giveaways EU grand finals - nice.
2017 twister season with battlegrounds was 8.8 million per member if you won all three tournaments that week
I once almost had 100,000,000 credits... it was just silly after a while lol
The_HONOUR had 500m before
I feel that when my tournaments winnings don’t cover the gap in crew and tank pools between myself and the other competitors- it’s a bit frustrating. I know a ton of blitz pros have 7 skill crews on every class, and almost close to twice as my tier x tank pool. (I have around 18 if you’re wondering)
Also making 1m credits in a normal weekend and tournament when I can just simply play my Jag 88, and toon for the same amount in the same time makes it really redundant at times. I want meaning in tournaments, such as the coverage and the prize pools in professionals, although the credit amount seems to be omega questionable. (Everything else is fine for me though)
I think it’s great that they properly rewarded the older players who weren’t the pramos of the world, but really I would like to see modern teams get rewarded a proportional amount to the costs and effort it takes for them to play
That moment when you’re broke playing the video game trying to advance your utility and usefulness in comp (clan wars)
that pic from last year right+
18 is a good number if relevant tanks
I only have 22 Tier Xs but I think I got most of the meta tanks covered (not just Asia) just don't ask me for American Tanks, I have none
Patton becoming meta again, start the grind
Only 22? That is 22/28 tech tree Tier X's. Then there's 6 collectors/premiums (CPs) currently in-game. So it is 22/34 total.
Except the M60, that is
about a month more so i get the last trash ones i was missing
not Tech tree only - I have T-22, Chieftain mk.6 and M60 - so that makes it 19 Tech tree tier X
I have 27 tech tree X (missing new Chinese TD), M60 and Mk.6
the reason why you don't see me using the T-22 is - I suck 😞
didnt we see mk6 in your carage in the last stream rolling?
Yes that's why I list it lol.
The Tier X I am missing: All American Tech Tree Tier X, Chinese MT and TD, Foch 155, Leopard 1
Arguably the T110E3 is the main one you miss.
my bad im dumb and mixed up everything again, somehow thought you dont have those tenks
yeah that's why I said "most"
IS-4 only tank for me lol
Will be good to see Badger and 4005 enter the mix soon enough. I think we should have them before Twister season (no idea, just guessing)
I am no where near Professional TD player but I might give that role a try soon
If you hide the lower plate nothing going to pen the thing so it is basically a heavy tank from the front
If you have to say what I am specialized in - is spamming IS-4s and rolling my head on the touchscreen bouncing shots
First you try MT and now TD? You're broken Maddocks
im missing lots of tanks, 113-G, 113, E100, M48, 268, 263, BC, Foch, AMX50b
I play Maus and IS-4, I prefer the IS-4 because I get more bounces and can pen everything lol
@pale finch get on that grind.
No way
i'd like to be a batchat driver but on mobile i am less than a noob
@mental yarrow yes I am broken - but I am getting nagged by @dim pivot to play the T-22
jajaja it's just cause he wants to abuse it cause it's "broken"
I’m currently grinding to the 183 for the magical 7 183 team lol
it took me more or less 6 months since I fully switched from PC to touch, now I am probably about 85-90% of my skills regained @fathom tiger
im originally a mobile player but i like pc more
Didn't you play touch before though?
Touch or pc, I will be bad
@mental yarrow that was way before I switched to PC for a full 2 year period
I lost some skills here and there, it's a bit hard to pick them back up tbh
I feel like moving is easier on mobile, but aiming/shooting is easier on PC
I still tunnel quite a bit but that's how the learning goes - let's hope I can get back to my peak someday
I personally haven’t played on PC but that’s what I would think
i agree, shooting and aiming is a lot easier on pc (imo) but i disagree that moving would be easier on mobile
I mean, not like a huge difference but on mobile you have a joy stick and on PC you have 4 arrows that make like 8 different directions/turning angles
Tournament stuff?
yes
@vital obsidian yes, about why I suck at tournaments
Okay 👍
@silver vapor play t22 plox
me getting caught tunneling
i am used to wasd moving keys making it atleast for me a lot easier to move in blitz as well
@dim pivot show me how
Yolo and sidescrape works
When you see 2 IS-4 and you’re alone its all over lol
I got punished heavily for that tunneling ._.
Nab :)) jk
Omg mobile moving i despise
Pc by far is just so so so much more comfortable on both areas than movle
Wasd i use for moving,R,F,C i use for consumables
im boring and use 1,2,3 for ammos and 4,5,6 for consumables
I have a separate keypad for playing on PC controls.
@solar coral @solar coral
Razer Tartarus RGB 2.0
123456 is unpractical
I use 123456
is ez
ikr and another 200IQ solution is to put all the commands into F1-F9
Xd
I have help on F and attack on T
Other commands I don't care about
Anyone free for training tonight 20.00?
I use default controls on mobile lol, with the second fire button and auto aim button
Reloading command on Q, small repair on space bar, larger repair on middle mouse, adrenaline/engine boost on E
Confusion on 1
Those binds make sense if you’ve played other pc games I swear
ehh i wouldnt use those binds on any game lmao, but ive mostly played fps games and lol @flat goblet
lol uses both Q and E, FPS uses space
yeah i was just thinking about using those binds together
i rebind everytime i launch a new game though so i dont really remember the normal binds lol
I use f for repair, 4 for multipurpose, and mouse button for adrenaline/ engine boost
Why not just 123?
123 are further away
@winter swallow as for someone like me who have played this game since second week of release I can tell you tournaments do not make you bank xd I struggle to get enough credits to buy tanks I want all the time
I played since October 2014... they used to help me a lot lol
hi
@winter swallow as someone that literally have 16k battles after 5 years tournament battles takes up 1/10 of my total battle count and they definitely do not help you with your credit count 😂
Tournaments used to have seriously good payouts, both gold and credits
But that was a long time ago, back when tournaments first began
OwO 10% of my games are tourney games too but i got total of 47k games lol
I'd like to get all of my creds from tourneys so i wouldnt need to grind them in randoms
Omg 4700 battles in tournaments??
Wow you have no life
@flat goblet reeee back then I’m just another wot pc player playing skirmishes more than blitz
Yea and i've only played a bit over 2 years lol
I’m on 1.7k tourney battles and I’ve played them since it started lol
I’m almost 1.7 😃 and I rarely play quick tournaments
Yeah same, I don’t like QTs
I like how I was grinding T30 yesterday with a premium account and lost one million credits, that’s like my entire spring professionals crediting earning right there XD
Yeah... it’s sad how costing it is
My tourney games are just spamm of tier 6 and 8 mostly from a year ago😂
But yes More creds from tourneys pls
Even +1% pls that helps the grinding too
570 tournament games and iv played 4 years...
Im looking for a team in friday V-VI I will play with kv-1s.
I'm on about 1.5k Tournament games in 2 years
OH I play 0 Tournaments!
I've commentated more games than I've played now for comp I think....
@pale finch As we said before we are not going to increase rewards in tournaments, because we don't want that tournaments will become a place when you can easy farm.
Lol,what is the purpose of tournaments then?
@chilly terrace how about increasing rewards for currencies (tokens) for which that are not easily farmable for random battles?
So indirectly you’re saying that you need a premium account and premium tanks to be able to not go completely bankrupt in the game while playing tier X or grinding high tier tanks? I mean, if you cannot make enough credits while constantly winning tournaments than what’s the point of playing them. I thought increasing interest would be the primary goal of a company rather than decreasing rewards and decreasing interest
I agree that Tournaments shouldn't be a farming ground for credits - but the current rewards are lacking.
U can farm about 3 millions of credits in random battles with prem vehicle and prem account in 2 hours,then why should i play tourneys which ofc much more challenging than random battles and be given much more less than i could get in randoms?reward is the thing why ppl wanna compete in this game,better reward-more interest from players-more ppl play tourneys
And how about mid tier players and teams who doesnt win tournaments? Its not exactly motivating to organize players, invest time, play and dont get anything back.
I agree that tournaments shouldn't detract or substitute public match game play. If better players can get better rewards toward the standard grind it kind of breaks the in-game economy a little bit. BUT then I do like the added rewards from Ranked matches - which is bit like an ELO system.
However, I do believe that in order to keep the most experienced and talented players in the game, tournaments need to be rewarding in ways that public matches aren't. Cash prizes are the obvious first step. Beyond that though, aesthetic and prestige elements are the logical go to. WG have already done this, avatars, camos, clan logos etc. - I think an increase in this and addition of other new similar features is great.
Tournament prizes as Tier X legendary or exclusive camouflage and equipment unlocks would be a nice touch.
Or for example, play 1000 tournament matches and earn an unlock for a premium of that tournament tier.
I think that WG need to appreciate that creating a tournament team, organising it, training together and committing to play at specific times (sometimes at a high frequency) is far more demanding than random public game play, be it ranked or not. And I think that needs to be reflected/rewarded somehow.
Ironically, for the best tournament players - tournament rewards are less than their in game performance would earn. However, for weaker players - tournament prizes would be more but they get systematically destroyed and knocked out early by the afore mentioned teams of top players.
++there is just no point in playing QT atm , you get 600k credits and you have to give the half of it to ammo, repairs etc. why would i play tournaments while i can get 300k in 5-6 random battles
Only point of QT atm is to have fun and do stupid stuff
yeah
Quick Tournaments are IMO aimed at new teams/players.
In a way it's almost a good thing that the best teams don't compete, because it gives some breathing room to the less experienced units.
The bronze/silver/gold tournament system was the best imo
^ was also a fan
You were playing with teams at your level and you actually were attracted by the rewards
But the rewards eclipsed public matches too much.
Even if you lower the rewards a bit compared to the last time it would be much better than QT's
Quick tours are good for fun and its great to chill with friends. Dont remove! For tours should ammo repairs be free
the word I always used was "Appropriate" rewards - there's a reason why people are not satisfied with the current rewards.
as rolling said - making a 7 player team that can play together is not an easy thing. And if they manage to assemble a 7 player team and able to win games, they should be at least rewarded for their tries, not just giving them next to nothing and discourage them from joining anymore.
As for regular teams, they should get rewards for their dedication, as they are mainly the ones that fill the QT queues right now, not the top teams, not the bottom teams, but the middle regulars
as for the top ones, it's really obvious they should be rewarded more for their highly competitiveness
Yes, but I agree with WG that these rewards shouldn't devalue "normal" game play.
Ideally, all players will want to play both public and tournament matches. Creating a divide would probably be detrimental to the game (and our experiences) in the long term.
It’s a silly mindset Brian, the clans that constantly compete at the top level should be considered elitists and be rewarded that way, bring the bronze/silver/gold tourney back and give some proper rewards in the gold stage, similar to the ones that were given before.
Oh rite, my rewards from professionals btw (77k credits)
lol you got rewards?
Peter, I agree top teams should get rewarded for top performance - the whole game is focused on rewarding good play. However, those top players should still be incentivsed to play public matches too.
2 weeks of constant competing for 77k - I would just go QT instead, thanks.
77,000 isn't right.... is it? ...
Yes
We got rewards too
They still play public matches, regardless of rewards you get in tournaments, you need to actually play the game to stay in shape
@winter swallow that's what I got ¯_(ツ)_/¯
for beeing 1st place for over 14 battles i got 1.2m
Well that is stupid. Hold on. I will find a public match screenshot of earnings.
That reward was complete joke, worth investing time🙃
The amount of gold was 👌 compared to other tourneys
we lost the crucial game which dropped us from potential 4th to all the way 7th - which equals 700000 credits for the entire team (I mean - even QT earns more than this)
i didnt even get my gold yet😂
1 game in randoms.
Here are my rewards for being first place in the round robin system and playing every single game :))
@spice briar you won’t get gold until elimination round is over, since you made knockout stage
-_- niice
People who didn’t make knockout stage get awarded gold based on their group stage position
257k from one pub match.... versus 77k for 7 days of highest level tournament play. That is not good math.
Is 1.1 millions for first place good then?
@winter swallow bUt hE gOt sOmE gOlD
i quit cw ok ?@pale finch i go play löwe instead
@winter swallow I wouldn't say we did the "highest level" but you get the general meaning
@spice briar want to platoon? I will quit too and play T34
lets go
Top 8 on a server is highest level. I mean, even if you choke it's still a high level choke XD
High level choking is bad. everyone sees it.
insert Seattle flashbacks here 👉
You would just be made into a meme if you choke at high levels.
1.1 mill = 1 hour casual grinding
The credit rewards for this pro tourney have definitely been sad
And the gold is less than last year twister or pro tourney too
Top 3 get cash prizes though.
Only increase is actual money, which is definitely cool
my clan is mostly mid-level based players so they'll happily that QT rewards.
I like to look for more since I have been investing my time into tournaments (not for rewards but for nice team plays), and now I've stacked 2.2k tournaments and still the only rewards I really appreciated was the one in a million chance to go to Minsk for some offline combat
anticipating Rexy's comment
I personally find the chance for Minsk Offlines was way more rewarding than cash rewards/credit rewards .etc
tho we heavily memed it
You earn less playing 15 games in a Qt than 9 games in the ascent tournament
👀
👀👀👀
Yeah of course the offline final is by far the most rewarding thing in this game, for me it’s all about that unique experience that so little people are lucky to get
👀
😂
lol
Or not
I’m barely able to contain my excitement
I do genuinely value this forum as a chance for players and WG to discuss tournaments though. Rexy is the man.
^
^^
^^^
Rexy has left the chat
👀
@spice briar *1st place over 14 Best of 5 series.
@silver vapor That's the same.
@pale finch One hour in tournaments = one hour in random battles, if see on earning credits. Major tournaments are exception. You ask to get back Series tournaments from 2017 with their rewards, but if we did, it would be the tournaments where players come in for prizes, not for competitive.
Regarding Professionals Tournament - we will look again on calculations and will make decision based on our statistic (like we always do)
So you don’t want people to play for prizes? You want them to play for overall competition?
?they would come for the prize - but they would have to be competitive in order to get the prize, isn't it?
you guys aren't giving them the prize directly - you are making them play for competitiveness - but you don't reward them "appropriately", which means it's unlikely sustainable.
1 hour of tournament gameplay = 5 matches. 1 hour of public game play is a lot more.
He’s basically saying WG doesn’t want to incentivize the playerbase to play tournaments and earn more credits than pub matches. I’m sorry but if that MO holds true, why will people play tournaments?
If you want to play for competitiveness only, @chilly terrace you will organize a training against a top level opponent and you will play 6-10 different maps in 1-2 hours of time and will be able to practice your strengths and weaknesses, tournaments is supposed to be played for rewards and competitiveness, that’s why the old tournament system was much better because the gold tournament gave you strong opponents and good rewards. Now, for a top level team there is no point in taking part in the “ ordinary “ tournaments.
people don't play for competitiveness only, and they don't play for prizes only. it's the combination of both that makes an actual "tournament scene"
If WG refuses to give good prizing in regular tournaments, the incentive to play said tournaments will cease to exist
The logic is... baffling
I don't commentate QT's for several reasons. That is because it is omega-luls and not terribly competitive... and EXTREMELY time consuming.
My point is that good teams don’t play tournaments because of competitiveness, the team currently in finals, RA1D barely plays any tournaments at all, for example their front man in twister cup, Drizzell has only 900 tournament battles as a total and they’re still the team that successfully went to the finals on the EU region right away in prof tournament and managed to win last twister cup.
And think from player perspective @winter swallow
Same time commitment
Same omega LUL gameplay and still terrible rewards
Good teams rarely play QTs or other regular tourneys because the prizing isn’t good enough to commit the time
Ppl would rather grind tier 8 perms for credits and make a much larger profit than if they played a tourney
I have several QT invites on QT days on EU server account. Incentive to play?... no, it is much easier to farm credits in pub matches plus I can put the device down and crack on with something else if I feel like it.
^^
Tournament game play locks your time.
And as I said previously to add to what @thorn shale said, the competitiveness in quick tournaments can’t be compared to when you organize a training against a strong opponent and play 6-10 different maps in 1-2 hours. It is far more rewarding for the competitive aspect of the game
I think it's important to note, all the people currently weighing in share a dozen odd servers. But we are choosing to discuss it here.
Dear WG, the reason we are here discussing is to be productive and helpful - not whiny.
So please don't misunderstand us - we aren't complaining. Only sharing our views and perspectives for your consideration.
Just give 2 mill per tournament and I'll be happy
Guys, there are players with different level of playing except you. You don't like QT, but there are still players who play and like it.
The matter is not liking or not, the matter is that the overall tournaments except twister and prof tournament are not rewarding enough to keep the competitive players interested and active
@pale finch If it was the truth, there would not players in other tournaments at all.
This is not correct at all, lol, I’m talking about the players that are participating in tournaments such as the twister cup, prof tournament and makes it to the competitive stages. I did not say anything about the mid-level players of the game.
Oh, ok. Got you.
I specifically took the frontman of the twister cup winning team raid as an example where I stated that he ( RA1D_Drizzell ) only has 900 total tournament battles and nearly every participates in tournaments between the twister cup and prof tournament, same goes for a lot of other competitive teams and players. That was my point.
Sorry, but off-season is time for training. You are right, you have the gap between major tournaments, but you can spend this time for preparing to the next major tournament.
There is no other way to make tourneys more competitive but increase rewards, so that players realize why they should play tourneys instead of farming in randoms/train in training room
^ farming. A skilled player can perform better and earn more in public matches .
If I win ascent tourney I get 1m+ credits
You lose credits every game cause you have to shot gold+ repairs
Not if you run boosters and premium account
Not everyone has prem time
I get what u meant by play for competition but i doubt anyone of us wud play tournaments if there were no actual profit by the end of tourney (where we lose creds every game), rather we wud just make training rooms and fight against other clans and lose no creds. Training rooms wud also allow time flexibility
My point is only way u can get more competition is by increasing rewards
also so many peeps watch twister cup, etc on ur channel
All this wudnt be possible if the top players stopped playing tournaments
So keep ur tournament players happy by increasing rewards
:/
If top players stopped playing - we'd have new "top" players to take their place.
Shh
We are fungible.
Top players with a lower skill level, though
^^ yea thats totally wat i meant
They'd get there eventually. And the only people able to perceive a lower skill level are those involved in the current high level scene.
Adapt. Overcome. Improvise.
Even skilled and experienced players such as sk8 and Bushka (both awesome) don't see the comp meta nuance and skill curve.
But the only people who see that they don't see are the previously mentioned high scene level players and followers.
Most teams can't even comprehend how they truly lose to the top 20 teams on EU server. They just think the players are better.
Qt not that time consuming anymore, wg done god job 👍
The truth is that most teams are beaten before they even leave the spawn simply due to tank selection and strategy.
^ that's a good point right there
Combine that with awe inspiring communication and team cohesion...
@winter swallow the better players always have "skill" on their side - so people often think that factor is more influential, and the cause of their loss when they lose to players with better skills
The onyl way to demonstrate to the masses what they are missing would be to stream from in a tournament team, with voice comms and showing stratsketches / tacticlinks
they would be too revealing - but excellent way to showcase the difference between a top team and a mid-level team
I wanna make another small point which maybe hasn't been discussed or noticed , since 1-2 weeks the coins for watching Spring Season have been disabled , yet the player base following the tournament's hasn't went down ... Ask yourself why is that ? Because players are still into watching the tournament's , some of them aspire to become such players or even take part in such tournament's ...
Just once on a QT where a top team plays their heart out is all we'd need.
That way you'd also see a range of opponents in quick succession.
@winter swallow I could arrange something like this ... Lemme talk to Zird first if he would be interested
You can’t expect family friendly language though 🙃
@winter swallow ok , it's gonna be done , To the best of my capabilities
Top teams dont do serious tactics vs lets say 50% teams. Do whatever you want and win. 7 VK72 rush? Doable. Skill is what matters. When teams are closer to each other skillwise, then tactics comes in to point.
But a 50% team can still be a worthy opponent if they have a general idea on how to prepare , what tanks to use , how to create a successful tactic and how to train it ...
Top teams don't - but to demonstrate the difference, maybe they could jsut once.
Like for example, I think a top team could beat a new team without conceding a single hit point (even 7v7) in early QT rounds, if they really put their minds to it.
Of course, I understand your point. Im saying when skill cap is too big, tactics really doesnt matter, better team can do whatever they want and win easily.
Bully
I can understand Ur PoV ... But my point is that we need ppl to aspire to be pros , as in professional players ... We need ppl to have a goal in game ... We need role models to wich they can aspire ... So they can one day become themselves the pro players ... For 2 years now the top teams in EU have been mostly the same ... With minor tweaks and new arrivals ... Those new arrivals are interesting ... Those who aspire to be the next big thing
^
If it was the truth, there would not players in other tournaments at all.
We play it when there is no better tournament at this moment
@dreamy adder and what experience do u get out of it ? U do It for competition and growth as a team or just for fun ?
Both but more for fun
your honor , I rest my case
you can only play QT to have fun, anyone saying its for actual training/growth as a team hasnt played in a training room
also for competition is hard to imagine when most teams are on a really low skill level and not rarely play with only 6
Lol qt are so bad, play 1-2h to get around 1mil credits, go in lowe play for same time yoi will get double the amount of credits
Is not the whole game for fun 👀
if you want to do qt just do it you dont need feel ashamed cause someone dont like the mode
Full tier 9 team 😂 @vital obsidian
I look forward for future mad game qt late nite, In weekends
Ye its allowed to use t9 so why not
😂
what the.... in a tournament?
that's just mean
That's actually epic 😂😂
looks like grinding time
I Have Fresh Meme
aaa
Hi
Let’s be real. ‘Top players’ aren’t the focus for in game tournament systems (QT and regular tourneys). It is unrealistic to think that WG would tailor those to meet top team’s expectations.
However, WG should have a clear goal for what they want to do with their ‘esports’ scene. Wether they do or do not is something we the players will likely never see simply due to how WG is run. Which is unfortunate imo because communication between the players and WG would be extremely helpful in setting up/expanding/improving the ‘esports’ side of blitz.
@flat goblet but shouldn't 'top players' be able to enjoy the game too? Normally top, bad and average players all have very different perspectives of what is good and bad for the game
In what sense do you mean enjoy the game?
Top teams don’t play for the game, we play for all the other players on the team
I just want better rewards lol we have worked so hard and long for these months to get like a mil credits so bad honesty just toxic...
it's usually not what the minority wants but what the majority wants that gets accomplished so yeah
@flat goblet Normally top player want to get hefty rewards for being good. If the rewards in tourneys are too low and still have to split them amongst the team (9 way normally) they are going to think that they are not very important to the game and do not make an impact, resulting in slowly and gradually losing interest
So the majority don't want more rewards? @sharp token
also have to factor in not crashing the games economy
I'm not saying in insane amount but something more would be nice a mil credits is honestly garbage
Well, to be fair, the top minority shouldn’t be dictating what the majority wants. That being said, it is interesting to see how the economy of tourneys affects who is playing them. By making rewards less than spectacular, you get less “seal clubbing” top teams playing them for more than their own enjoyment and memes. Which should mean more mid-low tier teams participate.
Tbh I've put way more credits in this tourney then what I get out repairs a lot in ammo and getting last two equip spots on my tier 10s I play in comp I've probably lost money lmao
If that’s the case, can’t be sure.
Or WG can make all the consumables repairs ammos and other costs in tournaments 0, just like the training rooms @flat goblet
But by having bad rewards WG does not encourage more team/clans/players to try out and see if they want to start taking part in more tourney. Low rewards just throw off players, without them even trying or experiencing tournament battles. (I am saying this because I have seen 66%ers with less than 50 tournament battles)
Like let’s be honest here the current “major tournaments” rewards are less than the gold series back in the days 😂
^
I think tournaments suffer most from matchmaking to be honest. A group of friends playing the game with relatively decent win rate, trying to simply play together are likely going to find either much worse teams or much stronger teams. But this is a difficult issue to solve simply because there is no clear cut metric for judging a team's skill level.
(sorry for the late answer) So what you are trying to say is that (for example) a team of 7 45% friends can win against 7 70% player who haven't even met each other in battle ? Also if friends want to play together, then a platoon or countdown ain't so hard
No, i'm saying the experience of playing random WG tournament is likely not going to be valuable in that most teams won't get a "good" fight.
yeah like the thrill is when you meet an evenly matched team so it's a close battle
QT is wort tour ever
Looking at other games’ esport scene maybe we should make a leaderboard for each server, mm the clans that are ranked closer together for anything outside of major tournaments. That way we can have ppl chasing after the top of the leaderboard make the scene more competitive and introduce clan rank prizes? Like make clan competition into an official thing?
I believe even wot pc have a leaderboard for skirmishes, blitz should have one too, rankings can be based on points accumulated and head to head wins?
@thorn shale @flat goblet whatchu think
That is a possibility, but what about teams? Teams in a clan can be ranked quite differently from one another in the same clan, so there is that issue to handle when thinking about that.
We can like first form tournaments based on wr, and later into mm base on the rankings: 1-10 on the leaderboard face each other more often, 11-20 , and so on
yeah but when a top clan has 2 teams one stronger other weaker what then
And then you delve into non-clan tournaments, which is even more difficult to rank
Idk in the current situation is ppl switch on and off teams all the time and it’s definitely not viable for beginners
Only if blitz have an actual esports structure teams sponsors and everything 😂
But even then, that elo/ranking type system would only really work for the higher ups. Again, mid-low end teams won't benefit a whole lot from it other than getting clubbed by top teams less often.
Team reign sponsored by kfc
Idk why, but this is the most fun and interesting chat