#rating-battles
1 messages · Page 47 of 1
its not worth losing a 8 matches for 30 points
i just started 3170 today and ended with 3067
im serious
started at 3300 2 days ago now 5300
funny
its not about having team filled with 45% wr golegs
they need to balance rating matches like losing 30-20 points
WG must make low rating players league !!!
to not let them to play together with high rating players
players up to 2999 together
players up to 3999 together
and from 4000 ~ together
bruh imagine those spicy queue times
it's gonna be like 5 minutes for the average player and like literal eternity for people above 4k
Well I can certify that ‘I’ won & got the highest score out of both teams so my points should have gone up the most but no! 🙄 Last player left standing on my side. Port Bay.
@sonic sedge Firstly, no spotting no assisted damage quite fair to assume that you were farming instead of doing anything useful so you don't deserve anything, secondly how many times do you have to be told to stop complaining???
did stevo just ask for rating points to purely be distributed by damage
Tier 9-10 battle 😁 Dynasty’s Pearl
Outstanding haha
Wow I know people avging more than that 🤣
I can do the same stuff in a t7, and probably also a t6
Yes ratings are just no competitive any more 3 days in a row with just trash bots
They day this changes it will be just awesome
3 hours to get in battle and when you get in is for a loss
I started really good and now i cant keep on going up amazing my luck lmao
Ok
You will get ranked points if you do good so why even bother complaining?
Cause you do over 3k dmg and lose points, you do over 3k dmg winning and you get 10 points but when you lose you lose more than 10
Points system is just disgusting
Lol it works pretty well actually
Nah, it doesnt
I mean I was fine with the point system even at 6.5k rating +
Here at NA is horrible... but i dont think it differs from region
I mean teams are bad in every server it's just how u adapt
Yes i agree with that, im talking about the points system when you win or lose
Uh yeah obviously point system is the same in every server
I don’t get one thing about point system , when I play with tier 7 tank and do more dmg than tier 8 teammates I lose more points than them
Yes i agree with that, im talking about the points system when you win or lose
@blissful portal Only issue with ratings is how many points you loose sometimes even when your team is terrible. Ive lost 18 points on a 5k damage loss at the top of platinum league. Outside of that ratings are fine, if other people can make diamond deapite the noobs then maybe its not the teams skill that holds u back.
@ornate spoke Yes that has no sense sometimes you get more points for how many eliminations you got, sometimes for the damage, sometimes for the position at the end of the battle, etc
@blissful portal is much easier to climb at later stages of month then begin of month
I lowkey am contemplating spamming a SU152 in ratings
Rack up the module damage, nuke the light tanks, and p**s off everybody
What ya'll think
yes
Did u guys ever wonder why so few players play rating battles although it has been released for quite some time now? In other multiplayer games it is completely normal to play only competitive mode. The reason why this happens is the way the stats are being represented. When u open a players profile all u see is his winrate. The rating is pushed in the corner and is being resetted every month. Everyone cares about their stats. People even create 2nd or a 3rd account just to have beautiful looking profile. The current status of a player is primarly being decided bu his wr, not his rating. All u need to do to attract more players to rating is reorganizing the stats representation on the profile to something like this:
Show primarily stats of the latest period of time/battles, not the career stats. This way u dont have to worry about being held for a worse player then u are. Making the rating the main representation of a players skill level is WGs responsibility. It will hardly change on its own.
On top of that u could increase the credit earning. Despite current bonuses it is far easier to grind credits on normal battles. U could even divide the leagues into 4-5 divisions. to make it better more esthetic. No one likes to look at those ugly numbers
I just hope i didnt write all this for nothing
Agree
If u guys agree tag the wg staff so that they would see it
1/ Here is another issue : there is no WG staff around.
2/ stop trying to be constructive. This place is for complaining about teams and MM
3/ before DMing me, be aware that there might be some irony in my messages.
Who are the guys labelled as wargaming then : D?
I still remember when this place was so dead because no one was stupid enough to cry about ratings here
AvocadoConstant_TheUnknown10#2819 has been warned.
lmao
Change it or I'll delete it
how can i change it
Edit it
done
Thanks
Like the teams are so unbalanced its not even funny
A. BeGooo#3410 has been warned.
can anyone tell me a good tank for rating? @ me when u answer
@lucid zinc tech tree, FV301, VK 100, tiger 2
dont have them purchased but i have them researched
Panther 1, JPII if you can use it, standard b if you can use it, WT is easy farming
T62A and 268 for tier 10 as well, or literally any tier 10 heavy
for who wants to help i can send all my tanks
Go ahead
just take the 252u and bring balance to the ratings
Or spam your AX
T49 low key op in ratings
Not until you meet AX
or 252
T49 vs russian side armour is a massive joke
@lucid zinc foch, black prince or tigerP for other tanks in the tech tree. You’ll mostly come up against higher tiers but these tanks can hold their own, I’ve seen some play the helsing too but not every map will suit that tank.
those 200 he rolls are just 👌
I wouldn't recommend black prince due to low pen and relatively ineffective armor profile as well as terrible mobility
It’s broken
Only against T6 and some T7 against T8 there is not much it can do espacially against heavys that can angle
Foch is a turret less td considering teams it has some serious disadvantages due to people not supporting you when needed or they don't spot but it has armor that works pretty well against mediums and low tier tanks
Piger is a decent choice even tho I'd prefer Tiger I that has better mobility and a really good turret and only sacrifices a bit of armor
Man what is this dumb heavy spam, it’s sooo damn boring and unfair
Why the hell did WG give heavies so much health
Oh yes because the easiest class to play 100% deserved a buff
isnt td the easiest class to play? like you sit at the back and only oscillate around a single position
its not, because of being turretless
dude sitting behind a bush is without a doubt one of the most energy consuming activities you could ever do
you actaully need brains to be in the right bush and move to better one
Camping is one of the most toxic things you can do
why tho? people are stupid enough to poke around the corner you're watching and cry about getting a hit, doesnt that make peaking more toxic?
Peeking is agressive and promotes active gameplay, camping is the opposite. Sniping is fine if you are getting damage in but as soon as you are "covering" someone who isn't exposing and you aren't trying to reposition you are useless and your team might as well be in a 6v7. If you do that by choice then that's pretty toxic
are the people toxic over it or is the play style toxic?
Both
how can a playstyle be toxic?
Camping is pretty lazy and only noobs do it really, all you’re doing is sitting in the same spot without moving for more shots
Playstyles that ruin it for your teammates are toxic, and imo any toxicity back at them is fully deserved 🤷♀️
In ratings it is full of these campers, especially smashers
For example, this newbie who got 100% got T-22 out of his first crate, he just stayed back instead of pushing with the T92E1
I have irreversible scars from seeing this
And that’s why I hate the 183
if camping is toxic why am i not the one saying f u and it's the batchat
You’ve basically crippled him in 1 shot, so I’d expect him to be annoyed
people being toxic over a hit is not because cAmPiNg iS tOxIc it's because the peopl getting hit are toxic
if i did that shot from 20 meters away it would not be toxic cause then i wasnt camping anymore?
The tank you’re using is also toxic
also the map is toxic?
Your tank’s alpha and camping
i see we have a same exact problem here as why people suck in the game, RiGgEd mM, mY tEaM OnLy MoRoNs (making you a one), eNeMy aLwAyS bEtTeR. just people finding excuses from everything they can beacuse how could a player itself be toxic
everything else is toxic for sure
@restive dawn Both are as toxic as each other, your toxic camping triggered his toxicity so it's your playstyle that's the issue. If you weren't camping then it would require skill from you and a worse mistake from him.
People suck in this game because WG’s tutorial is bad
And the fact the shop is directly accessible by a complete newbie
so beacuse i am playing a tank i like the way i like i am criminal and should be sent to jail because someone i hit just got offended
i am playing only 183 in ratings this season come and meet me
Ain’t playing tier X gladly
you should make a montage of every time someone rages at you in your 183
that could be it
Because you are ruining the game for both your team and the reds you deserve all the toxicity you can get 🤷♀️ It should be your own responsibility to realise that actually you are one of the issues with tier 10 and to stop but hey some people just can't be helped
i am playing 183 just to ruin peoples days
That’s toxic
And it’s 100% justifiable that someone rages when over 75% of their HP gets taken in one shot
why would it be justifiable if you were the stupid one to come to the open and let it hit you
that is again you getting toxic due your lack of situanational awareness
Ok?
Because you are the one creating the issue fully just because you are selfish. You cannot be aware of an unspotted tank in the first place and being aware of every single tank is not possible even if they are spotted.
i understand i would feel sad and annoyed for getting a hit too but what is wrong in their minds to open a chat and write out loud their toxicity? FOCUS the next time to not to take a hit then, play better
It’s not a good amount of HP to work with
and you cannot like say it in your head or in your room you have to let everyone else in the game know that oopsie i took a big hit and now i need to focus to stay alive?
U guys need to understand that there is a difference between 40% standing in the same spot the whole game regardless the situation and a pro taking noobs out from behind
Again you can't do anything against an unspotted tank unless you base your entire playstyle around avoiding all possible camping spots which is just disgusting to do. If he's letting you know that what you are doing is just pitiful and sad then good on him
"toxic camping" lmao
to remove the toxicity the best way is to remove the chat
just keep it muted. The amount of people getting offended by "toxic camping" is too damn high
Or just to not camp in a 183 in the first placd
yeah play it like a heavy and have 45%
dunno about you but i play avoiding as much camping spots as possible suprisingly you dont take a lot shots from unspotted tds - who would have known
the only map on which you can not avoid TDs is Castila, Other than that I don't have any issues with tds
@balmy lily If you can't play the tank then that isn't anyone elses problem.
@restive dawn Then you play horrifically boring games
isnt it boring to take a -1300 in a first peak
Camping is toxic because it rewards people for doing nothing, and plus how don’t you get bored of it? It’s such a slow playstyle
Are u from USA by any chance? getting offended by everything
and campers are only rewarded because the average player just drives foward into the open then parks there
nah we got enough offenders in eu too
@balmy lily who did you ask that to
It's worth taking 1300 max for all the times the camper will miss, splash etc or just not be there and you actually get to have a fun game where you can be agressive
@balmy lily If you can't play the tank then that isn't anyone elses problem.
Pls enlighten me with ur wisdom
@restive dawn I am puzzled on how well you do in your deathstar
like I know the deathstar is still somewhat usable but every single one I see just gets spotted and everyone just focuses it
i honestly like the idea of the rage compilation feat. DS in ratings
is it allowed to show any names tho?
footage from every multiplayer game is being uploaded to youtube and streamed so there shouldnt be a problem
so im toxic because t62 crossed from the open and got deleted
open?
Honestly, no matter what tank you play, if you damage and or kill someone, chances are they will start throwing a tantrum. On the EU server anyway
Сhrist almighty how are people nearing 5.5K already????
This is the first time I have ever seen this happen first week into a season
The one season I decide to take it easy and slow down Im already miles behind smh
5.5k was reached on the first day of rating like 5 seasons ago
As in like the diamond leaderboard is already full along with platinum!!!
Last season no one was even in diamond the first few days, its only the 1st week into july wtf
seems pretty open to me
183 is just a tank and if you're careful you won't get shot by it
Also u cant play too different with it since WG killed its Camo so it has to rely on camping
Or, just play it more aggressively? The tank also got accuracy nerfs on top of everything else so just play up close. You’re gonna get spotted either way might as well play where you can land your shots
You play aggresive, u get melted.
I’m not saying play like a damn maus or something. Play second line
Your mobility and armor doesn't support too aggressive gameplay imo it only works on maps with good hiding position
What is a good calibration and do you actually make a good amount of extra credits in platinum and diamond. Trying to figure out if it is worth the grind
Good Cali is 4k + and in diamond its a noticeable amount
66% extre credits and xp over 5k I think
@ornate spoke As long make platinum league and up then start to notice the credits really it just how much battle you want to play
It’s not worth the grind if u just want creds and xp, it’s only worth if u want the stuff they give u
However if u just want to use ratings to grind to the next tank and make creds at the same time it’s a gud idea
TDs can camp, sure, but you need good decision making to choose the right position at the right moment
Tanks like the is4 and 252u are like "drive to center of action hurr durr"
Those two have blackholes as sidearmour, turret and hull
Russian shenanigans
Rating battles are supposed to be hard...not hard when you can buy skill from the shop ( a tier 8 HT like Action X or 252U) for 50 USD. Ridiculous.
I would love to see if someone could play the t28 get 5k plus only play t28 nothing else
It’s not even 50 dollars. The 252u was only 8.5k gold!
@snow surge You can't buy skill. The things you need to do well at the game aren't sold in the store.
cooldown boosters, playing already on T8 without premium account and using consumables several times per battle, provisions and premium ammo will make u broke in no time. Enhanced engine boost costs 8400 credits for T10 vehicles. That is insanely high. So if u dont have premium account and dont want to make minus credits while playing on a high tier u have to put urself at a disadvantage. The said things will maybe add only a few percent and it mostly depends on the skill, but it is nevertheless an indirect pay to win. Besides of this premium tanks are infamous for being strong (löwe, obj 252, smasher)
The good thing is T10 is not yet p2w
Furthermore, really frustrating is the fact, that u are able to use premium tanks at tournaments. The ability to choose from more tanks than the opponent puts u at an advantage, because u can apply more tactics and team combinations
@Maddaxkkm[E7] how is T10 different then from other tiers? Everything i said applies to it as well
I get that T10 has prems means that u get access to tanks which others don't but it's not p2w because the tech tree tanks in that tier are equally good or better
@balmy lily How is the Löwe overpowered seriously?
strong /= overpowered. It just means that it performs well compared to other tanks in its tier. U wouldnt prefer an IS-6 over lowe in tournament would you?
and we dont need to argue about that based on personal experience since we can simply look at stats
The Löwe is of course a good tank I like to play, but it’s not amongst the premiums I would complain about being spammed at tier 8 and being overpowered.
I wont argue with that, I just wanted to make a comment on the statement of @ornate spoke
I guess I've just moved past the point of seeing over powered tanks. I see over powered players. Every tank in this game has exploitable weaknesses. It's on the players to find and exploit those weaknesses.
When I get beat down by a player the vast majority of the time it isn't because of the tank they are driving.
You are right, but it does not mean that tanks shouldn't be balanced as well as possible. Climbing up to diamond with T28 would be a lot greater challenge then with obj 252
Not a great comparison.
Pls don't use T28 as an example when it's one of the worst tier 8s among tech trees alone
The game is geared towards Heavies being the alpha tank.
A better comparison would be the 252 vs the Tiger 2. In that example with all other things being equal the end result would be very close to / if not the same.
A better comparison would be the 252 vs the Tiger 2. In that example with all other things being equal the end result would be very close to / if not the same.
@ornate spoke because tiger 2 is almost as strong as obj, meanwhile T28 a pile of trash. And if u cant climb with TD's as well as with heavies it means that the rating system is badly balanced
TD's are meant to be a support tank. Which by default you are going to be more reliant upon your team. The T28 is one of the worst of the group so you'll be double reliant upon your team.
Like it or not this is a team game. Certain tanks can share more of the carry burden than others but at the end of the day it's a team effort to get the win.
Wargaming has made it known that Heavies are meant to be the meta. If you are going to play other supporting classes of tanks you either need to be very good in them or accept the fact that your fate is tied to the abilities of other players on your team doing their job.
@ornate spoke I think players should still be able to climb with any tank despite the current meta. After all, the rating point system is supposed to reward for personal performance. By giving slightly more points for damage could solve this problem. Btw, could u make a statement on what I said yesterday on stats representation?
Players can still climb if they excel at their craft. A excellent TD or Medium player will know where they need to be to get the job done despite what their team is doing. It's just the game in it's current state makes it easier to play in heavies. This is why your heavy vs TD comparison falls flat.
Personally I preferred the Medium meta in the pre 3.# days but that's just my opinion.
I don't recall what you wrote yesterday.
I'd be fine with 30 day performance being shown. I think it is a better indicator of actual game performance then career stats.
I came here because I want a change on this matter. In other skill based games the competitive rating represents the skill level, not mixed stats of how good u used to be and are now. Something like winrate doenst even exist in most games, only the rank.
Except that my 30 day wn8 is worse than my career 😢
Until this get changed rating battles will never be more popular then normal battles. The way it is now holds me back from playing. If I play only rating now after thousands of battles my stats would look as bad as they are now, meanwhile the rank is not being taken serious
I would like to to see 30 day avg tier and wr. I don't want a hazy unclear ranking system. 30 day avg tier and WR tells me everything I need to know.
It is hazy and unclear because no one plays it and people arent used to it. Through the lack of players the teams arent even made of same skilled players, but rather being mixed. Introducing divisions instead of pale numbers and maybe adding more leagues would help on the visual part. If enough players would play it, after a while u would only be placed with players that are about equally good. But of course im not against 30 day stats or stats in general, I just want the rating to be the main thing
I don't get the part where people complain that they never have skilled teams have you ever played at rankings of 5,5k and above? If you play at a normal time you'll get matched with very good players
Yes mainly, but u get a lot of times players thrown in that can have over 1000 points difference
and sometimes there are 1-3 good players on every team and it becomes a race who can kill bots faster
I won't play ratings. The time availability isn't friendly for when I'm free and the rewards aren't worth the extra time spent in queue.
I won't play ratings. The time availability isn't friendly for when I'm free and the rewards aren't worth the extra time spent in queue.
@ornate spoke thats why im here
It most likely still won't interest me. I'm a pub player through and through.
I guarantee you that if you meet skilled players you'll complain about that you get clapped
I guarantee you that if you meet skilled players you'll complain about that you get clapped
@fallen mortar U are supposed to meet players of equal skill level. If I meet someone way above my skill level it means them mathchmaker is not good
You shouldn't be able to climb infinitely in ranked there should be a line where you keep meeting people with insane skill that clap you out of existence
Lol. Why would you only want to play against same skill players? That sounds stagnant as hell and offers no push for improvement. Playing against better players drives me to want to do better.
You shouldn't be able to climb infinitely in ranked there should be a line where you keep meeting people with insane skill that clap you out of existence
Because that is climbing up/descending works (atleast in most games). If u outperform the current players u are matched with it means u are better then them and get a better rank. Then u are being challenged with better players. It is mostly how it already works isnt it? If u are in diamond u will be mostly only be placed with diamonds, while both teams having similar average raing = same skill level.
You shouldn't be able to climb infinitely in ranked there should be a line where you keep meeting people with insane skill that clap you out of existence
@fallen mortar And u only will climb further if u can outplay the best players. At least that's how a good rating system works.
I must admit I haven't been hit by a single rocket in a for me very long time
I got hit once in my obj 268 in idk 40 battles and before that even more battles I wasn't shot by missiles as well I don't know how you get shot or hit all the time but I don't
Probably because his team supported him well, allowing him to spam rockets, also what was annoying is that I couldn’t pen his side with HE
I get hit by the occasional missile, but it’s definitely having a much less significant impact now.
Still an annoying mechanic though
It’s weekend and the game is unplayable
its a friday....
A bit late, but there are tanks that perform better, i.e. any player will have better stats than he should expect at that tier and in that tank type.
I would call these tanks OP.
8 losses in a row in ratings, still unplayable game. No wonder with 4 clanless players on my team
oh booo hooo. Cry me a river
💧 💦 🌊
I hate that mindset of clanless = noob. I was clanless for around a year, and that was the top insult I got lmao
Clanless = noob > 90% of the time, happy now @neat slate ?
If you were clanless would you fullfill that definition
Yes can would 😂
Can ranked count to stats pls, pretty sure my 90 days now has barely changed since I play ratings so much
if rating counts to stats the rerolls, which probably make 15-25% of the rating player base are going to leave further killing the game mode. The only way rating can be improved, is for the current version to be left behind and a new approach to be taken.
And that’s only gonna work if enough people play ratings
If ratings counted towards stats, rip some 60wr tank stats
If ratings had a soft reset over a hard reset it would be much more balanced, rn u got pros just making it to plat and some 40%ers still hanging around high gold
It seems like everyone here just wants to be the first, not taking into account their capabilities
Pros just making it into plat lmao. Making plat is super easy. I ain’t uni and I made plat on the second day last season
There is a difference between "just made into plat" and "almost diamond"
I seriously played ratings for only one season. Almost took the entire 60 days + 1.2k battles just to go from 3.1k to 5k
Simple solution here, just have +/-500 rating matchmaking
He said pros just making into plat so idk what y’all talking about. I just referenced his post.
Hi
U have a purpl and a void and many other ppl from top clans in gold, and they’re stuck with other much less skilled players. This is what hard resets do, they mingle not skilled and skilled players, and it takes a while for the rating to actually be somewhat accurate
they just had bad 10 calibration games, what clan they in doesnt matter
Exactly, cuz everyone starts at 3k. If everyone started relative to their last season rating then this wouldn’t happen. Even if u had a bad calibration but are a gud player u should still be ahead of a bad player with good calibration
so in your logic a 60%er who does 500 dmg in each of their 10 games has to calibrate higher than a 45%er who did 2.5K in each of their games? You idea is brilliantly stupid
No, I meant a bad calibration not a terrible one, for example: someone at 3200 last season starts around there, and if he wins 7/10 he’ll prob calibrate around 3600-3700. If someone was at 5.5k last season, he’ll prob start around 4.2k, and if he wins 3/10 he’ll prob calibrate around 3.9-4.0k.
Also having a high wr doesn’t mean ur a gud player, being a gud player means u are consistently playing at a high level and not doing 500 dmg for 10 games. Also if a 40%er does 2.5k avg he’s not a bad player, myb he just got lucky, or his wr isn’t representative of his skill
@ornate spoke to have skill means to do damage and earn xp. To do these things, good armour, speed/agility, and a penetrating gun is necessary. Many players use their skills and knowledge to make their tank's more limited characteristics shine in battle (flanking, aiming, sidescraping, hulldown, initial spotting). But with the introduction of premium "idiot-proof" tanks like the t22 medium, Def. Mk. 1, 252U, and Action X, experience in the game is not necessary to have good battle characteristics. So, comes the phrase "buying skill".
A bad player any of those tanks will still be a bad player.
But still perform better than in any other tank of the same class at same tier.
In that respect, your are buying an extra skill compared to your actual one.
Mk 1 driven by a noob is still garbage because he would show his Hull same with 252 u and t22 and action x
Defender Mk1 is OP
I wouldn't say op
Why? It’s a direct upgrade over the centurion
The Centurion's a pretty garbage tank. OP means that it can be put in any scenario and dominate in that said scenario with overwhelming efficiency.
The MK1 actually is good at its roles. The Centurion isn't.
Mk1 isn’t op, just very good. Cent is mediocre
"dominate in that scenario" considering the skills of the player.
Corrected it for you.
mk1 is OP, because its got 4 shell autoloader with good gun handling, basically impenetrable turret except to the highest pen rounds, decent mobility, good gun dep, and decent dpm. mk1 is the most overpowered tier 8 medium (not like tier 8 mediums were good in the first place)
It’s slow af, low alpha so u can just not take all 4 shots, hull armor is a joke, it’s huge for a medium, not great camo. Basically the drawbacks it has doesn’t make it op. It is one the best t8 meds tho, but they all suck
It’s just a centurion 1 (which already performs poorly imo) with a 4 shot autoloader and the removal of the side skirts, which makes it even more vulnerable to HE
low alpha? nearly all clip tanks have subpar alpha... thats what a clip is for. Huge for a med? No problem, give it some side armour. Its not slow for a med with that armour... Camo? Who cares about camo in hull down tanks when you're constantly exposing yourself to the opponent because you're turret is stronger than the action X's?
That turret is OP, 100mm more thick than centurion’s and 76mm spaced armour plates because why not, 800 clip for a tank that is extremely good at hulldown, at least the lorraine is large and paper and has high risks when exposed
Why do we have a calibration anyway just start climbing from bronze league
facts
Because some will not want to climb out of bronze league, @restive dawn
Lots of easy aces there
Last season we got the ATGMS, this season we get the stupidly british lights with high turrer armor... what is waiting for us next season....
Kranvagn with 4k dpm
Im not surprised now lol, 4 battles in the day 4 loses this is just trash im tired of bot teams, disgusting streaks and points system
4 isn’t even high
i know, but its funnt that the first 4 battles were a loss and lost over 40 points
Then i will do an excellent battle and the horrible point system will give me 7 points like it always does
More frustrating is the 3 hour wait to get in a battle
now 5
Went 3-15 yesterday
That sucks@warm charm , we need to reach the top again man, the first ones are spamming all new britsh lights and they dont stop winning
Update 9 battles 1 win.... joke ratings
Or you?
After callibrating in the top 3 and being top 10 till yestarday...nah i dont think so
git gud and stop complaining
^^
Stevomoment
@tall berry Make silence bot not talking to you, i will complain all what i want
just got called a bot from someone that is irrelevant
RI was doing great and another 5 loses in a row this is sick really ratings suck even more than randome battles what a joke
@tall berry and im gettind a "git gud" from a 2k battles player
so u want my main account?
hMMm
there you go @blissful portal
and ratings is supposed to suck more, it requires skill something you dont have
lol another newb account, plus nah, ur right i dont have skills thats why i was top 5 till yesterday newb @tall berry but thanks to bots like you my ratings gets destroyed
@blissful portal then why are you in srn and not -rvg- if ur so skilled
top 5 is irrelevant if you just spam battles
And plus it doesn’t show skill either
@worldly anvil cause i dont have the stats required as i dont play to much random battles ,@tall berry the spam of battles is the need to go up through the leaderboards due to the noobs i get, plus i got top 5 with callibration u are saying 10 battles is spam? lol
Keep in mind the season has 2/3 left
^^^
Yes i know i just dont want to get away from the first ones thats why
@blissful portal play more then
@worldly anvil im trying that, i started playing the game as a kid and didnt know what the WR was i left the game for some time and when i got back i was at 47% since them im trying to improve my wr but now i dont have to much time to play, the time i get i use it for ratings
@blissful portal then get a better 30 day at least
you can't compete with super unis with those stats
I know im doing my best when i play randoms
Rating battles should affect stats, change my mind
nu
Lost 200 points just thanks WG thanks a lot
🍿
I will eventually get the fearless by the end of the year
Me 2 this is just a joke
Went from 5.020 to 4802 im not joking... full of noobs i cant believe this
But well...
Set a goal for how much rating you are willing to lose. If you go past, you stop for the day. Otherwise, keep playing
Nice idea
love people that complain about rating and it being wgs fault, amazing, its not the like the players in your team + yourself lose those games😂 srsly grow up, or just stop playing ratings, the skill that was needed in the past for rating is long gone,its just a process of how much can you grind and waste time
Camping premium heavies are in abundance in ratings, 30-40% wr, under 1k games, working as intended.
u also have that in randoms,so what
The problem with ratings is that u should be getting around 50% wr, since theoretically all teams should be equal. However, when u have unskilled players and bad luck, ur wr goes under 50%, which under the current rating system means u almost always lose pts, even if ur carrying every single game
Nobody is saying you should be able to carry every game. But the fact of the matter is if you are doing your part there is no way that you should fall below 50% win rate consistently. If you are consistently below 50% win rate that is not a team or bad luck issue. That is you issue.
+5 👍😆 Highest out of everyone 🤣
You generally are yeah
This season is so easy compared to the last one
Ah yes, “all right” and then he starts complaining about me
he clearly meant your other right xD
now tell me the sense of keeping the atgm even in the ratings, there are players who spam it and reach more than 5000 points using ONLY that type of tank. Already ruin the random games not even being able to cover behind a hill, at least in the ratings would not be better to maintain the original style of play without these tanks out of the ordinary? tell me if i'm wrong to think so
People say ATGMs are broken because they hardly turn anymore, then why are purely average players getting to the leaderboards spamming these types of braindead tanks? It’s really dumb
@median wagon the fundamental mechanic of hitting someone without having direct line of sight on them is broken
atgms just ruin the game, nothing else to say
I personally am seeing less missile spam. Less Sheris
And more Vickers
The tier 9’s a lil overcooked
T92 had been balanced nicely imo. Aside from the people still complaining about ATGM’s it still has a little bit of a troll upper plate, which can help you a bit. I haven’t played the Cruiser, but from what I’ve seen it is very strong, but not OP
people will always complain about "op tanks", it will never change
cruiser is not op? Bruh it is very OP. If i can avg more than it that most of my t10s smth is wrong (currently i butchered the stats but i can easily imporve them)
It’s still a light with the only armor existing in some degree on the manlet, not the entire front of the turret. Any competent player who knows how to hull down will perform in this tank
lel hull down in a light tank
why should the class matter? you can hull down in anything, the most useful thing about doing it is you lower the amount of armor you can get shot at
class stereotypes
light tank = fast, not much armour, okay gun
med = decent of everything
heavy = slow, armoured, good gun
td = amazing gun, armour is balanced with the speed, no turret
i was talking about why class matters when it comes to do hulldown
any tank can do any tactic
some are better than others
exactly
because it doesnt, you can do it in any tank, the effectiveness just differs from tank to tank
also it was sarcastic/a joke
usually light tanks aren't effective hull down
imo the cr might as well be classed as a med
class stereotypes
light tank = fast, not much armour, okay gun
med = decent of everything
heavy = slow, armoured, good gun
td = amazing gun, armour is balanced with the speed, no turret
Emphasis on stereotypes, there are tanks that are classed as one thing and perform better in another role. Take the Tiger 1 for example. It can’t work a frontline like the it’s counterpart, so running it like a medium is smarter
there are always exceptions, stereotypes aren't exactly what each tank will be
some tanks that got worse because of powercreep, especially powercreeped heavies, like going med route because their armour is more effective there, yet they still have enough speed, like is7, is6, and is8
Sheri isn’t as impactful as it used to be, but having an atgm will always make it broken, unless everything is complete garbage. Vcr is op, turret is tiny and u have small areas to pen, and it’s fast so u only have a 5% chance of penning it when it’s hull down, not to mention the broken view range
Sheridan and T92 will always have the ATGM’s, but I still don’t believe that makes them broken. The missiles have poor handling, less pen compared to mediums HEAT rounds, and it has balanced mobility, compared to similar tanks.
Poor handling? You mean pinpoint accuracy? Less pen compared to medium HEAT rounds? Compare it to light tank heat rounds instead, which makes it average. Mobility is mobility, although both atgm tanks have relatively troll armour, either in thickness and angles or just straight up spaced armour.
The tanks are very strong, which is why you may see a lot in ratings battles, even after missile nerf.
The fact that they have 100% accuracy and is player controlled will always make it broken unless it gets nerfed so hard that it can barely turn or is slow af
If the rockets are slow then that’s a buff
I'm pretty happy with the missile tanks rn tbh
Changing the missile speed is a double-edged sword, it gives the person using the missiles more time to adjust the missile’s course but also gives the person trying to block the shot more time to react
But that aside I’m still not a fan of missiles
just remove this trash mechanic already
it doesnt belong to this game
Out of season april fools joke. The next lights will have an air strike as premium or what?
Good idea!
WG’s not gonna remove the missile mechanic. Besides, it’s a lot easier to avoid the missiles now since they cant even turn as fast anymore
you have a lot more time to aim them
basically it got worse for heavies but better for meds
ratings is full of them still
Prob becuz I spam it lol
idk, I can angle against the missiles a bit more comfortably now that i have more reaction time
196 points ?
@mint nexus it was likely their last calibration battle
To make progress in rating every season one needs to buy a tank on offer. Then everything works fine until the next season. I won a lot in T34 the season I bought it, then it has become useless as any tech tree tank.
^ this is complete and utter 💩
It's easy to go up without buying anything at all, and unless the tank is awful or op it's all on how well the player can play the tank
that's why 183 is the best
To make progress in rating every season one needs to buy a tank on offer. Then everything works fine until the next season. I won a lot in T34 the season I bought it, then it has become useless as any tech tree tank.
@bleak crest that it the worst excuse i have heard in the long time, how long did it took for you to come up with that?
gotta love this thingy
to diamond with 183?
Do it
@bleak crest the only way to make progress this season it seems to spam the new light tanks... Which is disgusting
no, to progress you play well, it doesnt matter what tank you play, but apperantly you two are too bad to realise this, learn to play
^
The rocket and heavy spam is more disgusting
It was obvious that rockets will be spammed even more when the mobility and armor of the US lights was nerfed. Wargaming loves it as rockets cost a lot more.
Worst team I’ve had in ratings, we also had a 400 higher average rating and 3 40wrs, why?
And IS-6 spammed HE
the reason its higher is coz 3 are not calibrated yet
What?
I know the av. dmg isn't great but Lowe carried me to 5k
Hot
For me it was the E100 and e5
@crimson goblet If you are going to say stupiditys about other people make silence, thanks
No use complaining if you ain't going to listen to the best advice you can get 🤷♀️
@agile sphinx you talking to me?
true,but maybe i dont know anything according to this guy 🤷🏼♂️ not like i got my 70% for a reason
@blissful portal Yes I am
@crimson goblet U nab u just pay for WR bot u brainless smh
@agile sphinx do you think that after 6 years in the game i need an advice? lol, New lights spamming is disgusting and the only way to progress if you dont believe me why the top players of NA every single battle they use the new light tanks...
Yes I do. Everyone needs advice to get better, whether you can handle that or not is down to the individual. The lights are vaguely annoying but not "disgusting" by a long margin. They just happen to be the best tanks to gain points with all the spotting damage they can get as well as their decent guns to get damage in themselves.
plus you call a "learn to play" an advice? lmao
Beef
@agile sphinx more turret armor than some meds, good gun depression, amazing view range, amazing dpm, amazing average damage and penetrarion... yeah i think they are perfectly balanced...
nobody said that they were perfectly balanced, just goes to show how rarted you are
Damn the T55 A is a sweet tank for rating
It's about as good advice as you can expect with the attitude and comments you put in here lol. The dpm sure ain't amazing and neither is their alpha or pen, but as said nobody said they were balanced
For honourless it seems they are balanced... as he said they are not disgusting
Aren’t rockets the disgusting one?
I never complained about rockets
well kind of but I see so many nabs in the last time which cant handle rockets
there's a pretty big gap between "balanced" and "absolutely broken" the new light tanks are somewhere in between
@cobalt gate true
the new lights are decent, cr is overcooked but whatever it's not like game-breaking
yeah just because 70% wr players used their free exp and were godlike in those tanks doesn´t mean that they are op
and besides getting mad at people for using decent tanks is like getting mad at people for like, actually taking advantage of something everyone has access to
Its funnt if you think ATGMs were OP and now you are saying new light tanks arent OP
damn maybe I missed something but I don't remember ATGMs ever being on the british light tanks
I also don't remember getting hit for 560 alpha from the sky by any of the tanks from the vickers line
You should
@native marten high roll of the new light tanks can do almost 500 dmg... and with HE i dont even want to know
not even close
350 alpha (standard), at a max roll, goes up to 438 (which is less than the alpha on the HE)
the HE alpha is 440
multiply by 1.25 for max roll
550 is its highest roll possible (besides engine fires and ammo racks) @blissful portal
i said almost..
438 isn't very close to 500
in higher tiers 60 dmg is nothing so is pretty close
bruh if someone has 490 HP and you only have 438 to shoot him what would happen?
it's really not
unless you're willing to agree that the 268 has basically 860 alpha (as max roll is 800 and 60 is apparently not that much damage), Sheridan has 760 alpha (as 700 is the max roll and 60 damage is nothing), and most mediums nearly have 500 alpha
more alpha is always good especially in those situations in which one shot decides the match
you're going on the assumption that every single shot is going to be 438 alpha from a 350 alpha gun, and 60 extra alpha is nothing
@cobalt gate just a ram or HE and its gone
there's a pretty big reason why 350 alpha and 400 alpha are pretty significant, and there's also a reason why 420 alpha on the WZ-121, despite only being 70 alpha away from 350 alpha mediums, IS a pretty big difference
@blissful portal well you only have 10 hp because he just shot at you and is reloading so you peek out to shoot
those scenarios are not rare
@native marten there is the first error, why would with that DPM do more dmg or the same dmg than a medium tank, and you cant compare them to B Chat or Sheri cause one has an autoloader and the other one has a derp with both having more than 10 second reload
I can basically say Vickers Cruiser its better than the FV202
I can also say, They both are basically equal, one’s Strength is the other’s weakness, so they cancel out, it’s more based on how skilled the player is or how the tank is played, aggressively or defensively, i think they are support tanks and will need teammates most of the time, except in 1v1’s, my opinion
It maybe... now we should stop talking in this channel about the Light tanks xD as we are in Ratings
Agreed
i hate vickers more the missiles barely hit me but the 110mm HE does from vickers and the turret is just insanely annoying
lmao just play tier 8. and you avoid a lot of the vickers and missiles
Why would anyone play tier 8 over a 10
@pine falcon i only got 2 T8s atm and one of them i dislike a lot IS-5 and the other is ISU 130 which in ranked is bad idea since whos gonna support me ... right nobody
@restive dawn in diamond to get some extra juicy credit output if he/she/it isnt into tourneys
@restive dawn well I have dedicated myself this season to climbing sooo currently doing only tier 8 because the climb is way easier.
@fallen mortar well the only thing you need to perform well is a heavy with ok-ish armor with a reliable gun
You lose more games that in pubs so do those extra credits actually make up anything
you get 66% more credits and with a prem tank u usually dont loose credits anyway
uum no. Tier 8 rating is so easy to win
More noobs in tier 8 though
Tier 8 ratings ez if you have one of the broken prems
ratings is all about spamming game after game after game, there is no skill needed. i would like to see some requirements to join rating battles, players need minimum 5k battles ( i saw people playing in prem tanks with only 500 battles..) and maybe a wr of 50% minimun to participate (or at least dealing 1k average damage or sth like that) and it should not be possible to do 1000+ games in one ratingseason (1 month).
i personally do round about 200 battles each season, cause i only want this camo on some tanks, i did it 2 times to diamond league, but platin is always easy to get.
wg should change sth, its no skill based mode. to get faster into games, i have sometime players with less than 2000 games in team, they even just know the basics, which is fine. but in ratings i expected some expierenced players..
i love playing ratings in every tier from VII to X, but i wish it could be possible to get a skill based matchmaking at least in ratings..... its random as it is in normals.
Happy tanking!!
I do not think requirements of 5000 battles and an above average winrate of 50% is the way to go. NA and Asia already have issues with queue times with no requirements. Having that high requirements would kill it.
Having lower requirements could work, but there would be no need for them if the rating system itself was looked at.
For starters, I think the system should move away from players top priority being to farm as much damage as possible in their games, and actually make it more team based performance
An idea that possibly could kill or improve ratings is that to enter ratings you need an ace on a T10 or the certain T you want to play but it has to be tech tree
Or maybe try one Rating Season excluding all premium and collector vehicles, like they are testing for first time in Ranked Battles at WoT PC
The vast majority of the players has less than 5k battles. WG wants them to buy a high tier tank as fast as possible.
5k battles mini and techtree only can not be the commercial strategy of WG for rating battles.
u think rating is commercial thing in first place? I'd imagine it should be more a place for more seasonate players
If they just exclude prems/collectors it would make ratings a lot better, would mean a lot less op tanks and pretty much removes all the 500 battle bots
If they remove prems/collectors from ratings, a lot less people would be playing for credits, so a lot less people will be playing ratings. A reason to play ratings is for credits, i dont think its a wise idea to take that away.
It feels pointless to play rating if u know that u wont get to diamond. Can u divide the leagues into divisons please?
its like asking: how are centumeters and millimeters useful if can measure everything in meters. it shows the skill level more accurately. there is quite the skill gap between 4100 and 4999
no as there's no reward incentive for anything except diamond
if you want to take away prems and have a battle requirement u need more rewards in ratings for end of season like more credits, gold, and free exp
I agree that prems need to be taken out but then queues will be awful, so you need something to pull players in
yeah and u cant see the rank of previous season. The rank is being resseted often and all what is left is an avatar. keep wondering why no one plays it
get to 5K and get parts for the fearless then... 5K isn't hard.
getting 20th or less is soul-crushing though
show me that please mr pro. there are less then 100 people in diamond right now
even if it would, it doesnt negate we said before
*what
I am a 59% er (good but not great) and I reached diamond yesterday with about 180 battles. I am neither a pro nor a noob but I can still say reaching diamond is fairly easy
I just don't see why people are constantly complaining about not being able to reach 5K (or even in some cases 4K) when all you have do it is play semi-decent and spam battles
who did complain now about that?
the regulars: stevo complains that he can't get 4K. Cracker complains that he can't get 5K and a couple of more. (and of course every single person who cannot get to a certain league complains about mm)
@pine falcon Well, you have to admit that sometimes MM is strange. I fought two days ago in a battle where we were 4 heavies and 3 TDs and enemy team was 3 heavies, 2 TDs and 2 meds ?! Their meds crashed us. Still, I like RBs. For me it’s a way to learn more, especially in matches with high RP average where teams are made of good players. I try to make every battle count though failing some times (it’s just inevitable) but not angry at MM anymore.
There’s like no limit on heavies in ratings
true. Sometimes MM is weird and unfair. But remember. MM can be unfair to you (for example giving and extra medium and a light on falls creek) but it can be unfair to the enemy (by giving your team an extra light and a med on falls creek). However most of the time we only notice the bad matchmaking towards us. Just like we only notice bad rng. If good things happen to us we accept them as if they are given. if bad things happen, we complain.
The worst case I have experienced is when the game gave the enemy team two maus on supremacy dynasty pearl. We got one maus sure, but our other heavy was a mk6. Hardly surprising that they easily took over the two caps in the town
This was a draw but win or lose this is really what the scoring should look like, give or take.
That enemy t57 heavy got it good
yep
Oof nearly lost to a smasher camper
@pine falcon Totally agree with you. That’s why I said I’m not angry at the MM anymore. Bot players are everywhere. Even I, myself act as a bot sometimes 😂
Why do people camp with smasher, when I rushed all he did was hide behind a corner and in a bush
coz if they also have to move they cant focus on were the enemies are, have some thought for these poor players,they cant handle driving and looking/shooting at the same time
It just frustrates me when people use desperate and scummy tactics
Yet again
when driving a 252u youre not allowed to complain about the other broken tanks you meet
You think 252u is OP?
It not maybe complete op as smasher but stronger than 70% of tank it faces. Only tank I find more stronger than object 252 is action x.
Action x has less reliable armour
@median wagon Camping Smasher makes more sense than camping T49
And I only play 252u because heavies are being spammed so I might as well be one
@worldly anvil true that but action x allows for more flexibility than object 252. Plus if used gun depression on action x good luck push on it without have to lose a lot of tank hp.
@worldly anvil wait action x would get up by dpm and hatches on top.
What, in 1v1s?
I think action x would have higher chance to win vs object 252 out of most Scenarios during battle.
I dont think so. 252u has much, much better armour and alpha, its literally an is7 at t8, except with the same/thicker armour 2 tiers lower
Um, 252u has such a poor DPM and AX has a great one
252u’s survivability is unparalleled at t8, and because of that it can do much more than just hull down. It can facehug, sidescrape, peekaboom, push a flank more effectively, hold a flank more effectively, while AX can only hull down and farm.
Armor and alpha is nice but think stop the object 252 be better from action x would be speed plus armour can only take so much. As where action x has speed and less reliable armor but if used turrent then should have no problem
AX’s turret is actually weaker than 252u’s, because of the hatch, and the hatch on AX is easily penned by most premium rounds. Also, AX has to peek a LOT more than 252u to be effective, therefore longer exposed, more potential damage taken.
Not sure but i think 252u’s top speed is relatively high
In a face to face fight AX would win with its great DPM
252u’s top speed is 35, reverse is 14, and AX’s is 38/12
Ah yes age old 1v1s totally relevant
In the infamous tier 8 tourney it’s the 252u spam that wins not the AX spam right
For most Battles most time you will 1v1 other player or at least 3
Lmao what
252u is more broken
AX is more broken
In pubs, yes
But in high rating games it’s not
Yes, thats why 252u is a better choice for ratings
I don’t even consider 252u broken, poor gun, giant lower plate and slower than the other clones
Bruh its pike nose is so strong it can sidescrape
What
When did I say it didn’t
BUT
High rating games actually have rotations and rushing singled out players, and then the other team does the same
When getting rushed 252u lasts way longer than an action X
252u is so good at face hugging until you meet a tall tank
What’s a tall tank that’s good in tier 8
Lowe, tiger 2, EXP, action x
Exp ehhhhhh
True that object 252 will last longer than action x when rushing but how long do think your team will last before action x kill rest of your team.
When it comes down to dpm brawling other tanks can work better than AX
AX is a cronked jack of all trades which can definitely pub stomp but when it comes down to it AX is still the master of none and there r better specialized tanks for it for a skilled player
True that but I would not say it not jack of all trades because every single job does that heavy need to do and sometimes even better than most only tank would better than it would be object 252u and vk 100 other that action x would own of rest of tier 8 heavys and if add the regrenade.
Action X cant exactly hold very long
Yes it can bleed them, but that wont matter when you get rushed by 2-4 tanks with your team to either side
A 252u would survive longer, allowing the team to farm
252u is better at helping the team, AX is better for one individual’s stats
And wins > personal damage in ratings
Is the new crate tank good for rating? I mean to play it cause buying will clearly have some other perks not mentioned...
No, sconq is balanced, therefore bad for rating
Renegade probably will be good for ratings
If your team is rush by 2-4 then match is already over then it matter of farming damage.
No, you should have 1-2 teammates behind you, minimum
Or at least nearby
You think people care about teamwork in ratings?
People are way more selfish in ratings
Not sure if read this right but you say object 252 is better for team then actions x for better individual stats and wins? Or meant say for object
@median wagon They want to win, dont they?
@hazy bronze 252u is better for the team, and action x for an individual.
Um there is hardly any teamwork in ratings, there’s lots of people who do scummy tactics like camping
@median wagon there doesnt have to be teamwork for there to be wins
I will say that object 252 is better for team but all depend on how good your team truly is.
All the smashers I’ve seen this season camped
@hazy bronze Annnddd thats one reason why the 252u > action x in ratings.
People are really desperate to win in ratings, so they’re selfish and do scummy tactics like camping
In rating damage is key don’t lose a lot of points how moveup
90% Sure most people would rather win and gain points than lose and lose less points
Ratings is only sweaty because of the IS-6 fearless reward
No, sweating is for people who aren't good enough to not sweat
That’s what I mean, tryhard rerolls
Ok, then what
Idk why I’ve seen so much more rerolls these days
In ratings, 252u > action x.
In pubs, theyre somewhat equal.
and yes this is #rating-battles
Object 252 is limitation is team as where action x is not base team effort so much less points if were play action x because you can end up do more than object 252.
A lot of rerolls come crying to me in DM after a rating match, “those stats hahaha” “56% trash”
252u can do completely fine by itself, its not team dependent.
@median wagon thats your problem lmao
rip
Some noob even tried to stat shame me, idk why
They’re all nice until you miss 1 shot 😂
It depend how good team last or even helps. Most of time average 3 or 2k min depend how fast your team wins or team loses. But I think will climb much faster in action x then were play object 252
And firing more shots gives extra points in rating
2-3k is a pretty big range
252u can do just that same amount, especially because it can survive so long with higher alpha
Pretty sure firing more shots does not give more rating, its just more potential for assistance or module damage
Droodles even made a video for it
Droodles thinks the is7 and the 5a are good, i wouldnt trust what he says
And there was a proof, when he played mk1 defender, he lost much less points
Because of more module damage, more tracking assistance? That would be understandable.
It would be a bit stupid of WG to make it so that more shots = more points.
5a isn’t too bad
It is bad compared to most other t10 heavies.
WG actually nerfed it in testing
ok
Ok
Only think make 5a is negative would pen on premium ammo if they buff man it would powerful tank.
Not really
I think that tank is really nice hulldown, it has 7 degrees of depression and possibly the strongest turret in the game
when people cant aim at your hull, yes
It’s not that awful
I know, ive played it plenty
If people at aiming at you that mean your also aiming at them.
Bruh thats amazing logic 200 iq
Something called crossfire, flanking, and peekaboom maybe?
All in one.
yes very 200%
Still it amazing tank maybe next time.
no
Droodles is just wrong.
I tried myself just about all the fast-firing and auto-loading tanks, and NONE of them performed any better than normal tanks. No more points gained, or less points lost.
There's 1 thing you missed, you aren't Droodles
He doesn't even have a rating for July. Zero battles.
Probably basing his opinion on just a few battles where he did well with autoloaders.
It was a common trend in his matches with mk1 defender
So that tank is OP? I don't have it.
I did not notice anything particular either. However I was using the amx French heavies which have long reload.
I think it has to do with shots hit since autoloaders like the 13 57 and mk1 have meh alpha, but a good clip damage. This leads to more shots hit for the same amount of damage, leading to possibly more xp and rating gained
Well it doesn't make sense the # of shots hit should mean anything for XP or rating points. Never heard that claimed anywhere else either.
Pretty sure its just more module damage/tracking assistance/time exposed for spotting your own targets.
^^^^
Having extra shots in the clip probably helps with that.
Also when did Droodles say the 5a and IS7 were good for ratings lmao
Never
He said they were good tanks, i never said he said they were good for ratings
honestly wouldnt surprise me if he did say that. i dont know what goes through his head when he starts running his mouth
imo, only redeeming quality about the 5a is the good front, other than that, nothing about it makes it stand out
5A is like the sconq,not necessarily bad,but just balanced,which many seem to have an issue with
They are average/balanced, but not good
You can choose the best tank you can for ratings but if the players you’re dumped with are not so good or don’t choose good tanks (like the T44, under 1000 battles player 🙄) & the tier 9 td you also have on your ‘team’ gets destroyed within the first minute then it’s irrelevant which tank you use, because no matter how well you do 99% of the time your (not so personal) rating is going down!
Yeah you might get stuck with some nab with 70k games who can't accept that actually it's his fault is rating goes down and then it becomes lots lots more difficult to win
lel the xp number is scuffed :D
hmm i dont need to spam "op" tanks to win games and have good results? :O how shocking
wow thats a good game
had 2.6k assist with 1.7k blocked
damn
Give me a team with brain pls
Oof
At that range, the most points that people lose is around 5-6. So something tells me that you weren’t really playing that well either
Everyone hates me using this tank for some reason and I get really upset I’m just a tank trying my best!
I think this tank is great but everyone hates that I play as it and I get comments saying here comes the 112...
Although trying to get the E-75 just so I can have another tank to lay with is a pain.
That’s not a bad tank though. You sure you’re getting flamed just because of your tank choice?
I doubt it’s the tank that causes it
Everyone hates that tank for some reason. So as the Action X.
You probably play poorly
I’m a person that recommends were our team goes. Then since I’m usally at the top of the roster, they all follow me.
And no, I actually play strategically while all my teammates don’t know what their doing.Then we get killed easily. The 112 is such a top tier tank everyone thinks they should follow it. It’s just such a pain how the whole team just doesn’t listen and go follow me.
My point is, play strategically. Don’t just follow people.
You’re in silver league
glacial is honestly super underrated
ok please don't be one of those people who think "oh im at the top i should be making calls"
I've seen about 5 people say that and everytime that happens we get steamrolled
please Please PLEASE don't make those calls
Im at the top of the roster!
listen to me!1!!!1!1!
@terse current the tank you are driving doesn't mean you get to make calls
@terse current you know alphabetic order ?
it seems funny how he apparently he never realised exactly that xD
My point is, play strategically. Don’t just follow people.
@terse current playing strategically can include following your team if you see it as a good option, playing strategically isn't just 1v7 epic 10k damage kolobanov carry games
Thanks for the info... I’ll get back to that.
Your team may be nubs, but every shot they take is beneficial to the team. Every hitpoint of damage they lose is a hitpoint you could have lost. Every bit of damage they do is a chunk off the enemy hp pool. Just because they can't carry a team doesn't mean they aren't required for a win.
Actually I don’t make the calls either. I just go my own way and everyone follows. But thanks for the info everyone.
just make sure that when you head your own way, your team does follow (unless it's some calculated risk, e.g. heading on your own to a flank because you're confident that you can beat the enemy in a 1v1 situation) and that you have a backup plan in case it does go wrong
@terse current the best advice I can give is to learn the good players and the good clans. If you see those players make a call you should follow it.
On the other hand if you see a clanless player or the dreaded player####### you should probably do the opposite of whatever call them make.
^ or look for avatars, if you see one that is hard to get or the lowest avatar (used to try and avoid focus by some) and it should tell you whether it's worth listening or not
When people focus me in ratings they usually mess their team up because they’re overexposing themselves just to shoot me
@ornate spoke hey.... I am currently clanless. Does that mean people should do the opposite of the suggestions I give
As a general rule yes they should, it's rare to see a good clanless player like yourself and so unless you recognise a username it's a good idea to stick to that rule imo @pine falcon
im sad now
@pine falcon there are always exceptions. Generally speaking what I said stands though.
Nothing personal
I've also seen a few player#######'s who know what they are doing but the are few and far between.
The amount you will gain by correctly hoping a player is an exception is a lot less than the amount you will loose by incorrectly assuming that, so it doesn't make sense to do that. The only way to go against that is to have an avatar that requires skill
Bruh
Understood.
Save some time to read a book. EU server down 🙂
@agile sphinx the are no avatars that requite skill except the pro and the challengers
Exactly lol 🤷♀️
Got question that people do rating on na? Where point that start earn less 20 per wins
If a player has a bunch of kalobanovs and raisins he is probably a good player, unless he is a sealclubber
Raiseniai are just luck
Raseinai medals are nothing but luck...
@median wagon damn you stole it my message xD
I have only 9 kolobanovs in my whole 20k matches
So some kolobanovs are also luck, like if your team has the upper hand cap
Not many 40%ers have 20 raisins is what I meant, so they more likely are good, or they play a lot of low tiers.
not many 60%ers have 20 raseiniais too. Also stop calling the medal a raisin...
It shouldn’t be the most honoured medal either
It’s hard to spell raseiniais but sorry. I was just saying that if a person has one of those avatars, there is a higher chance he is a good player and if you have no clue, it’s better to listen to them. I am not saying that people with those avatars are for sure good players or that getting rases or kalobanovs makes you good, or that they mean you are skilled or anything like that.
raseinias involve some skill, but its mostly depends on luck that you land in those situations where you can achieve that.
The first time I got that medal was in a tog lol
Im just want to ask if its normal to lose 25/24 battle
¯_(ツ)_/¯
bruh I'm at like 12k games or something and have yet to get a single ras lol
You can tell at times when a 40 wr makes a call
What is better than a great staring of ratings day with 8 loses in a row lol
Team’s fault
yep always the teams fault if u lose
@restive dawn Yeah basically in 7 of the 8 battles i finished top dmg... teams suck
Ive reached 4.9k points more than 5 times and then i get back to 4.8 again thanks to this trash noobs
Never struggled so much at platinum bots league
cool story bro
Plat is either where the decent players are, or the average players with too much time on their hands with good tanks are
I wish this was a story but not, i need to get the disgsuting teams where a player or 2 goes alone to one side, they sit in the open with a TD....
@worldly anvil i dont think so, around 3.5k to 4.5k full of bots
All i get is newbie with 0 experience using premium tanks or 40% that dont even listen or watch minimap to follow team
Well 48% is the average player’s WR, so...
I’ve been in diamond at least like 8 times by now
Diamond isnt the hardest to get to, just need some time and some skill, and you’re in
(not to put down your achievement or anything :/ )
The problem is the moment I reach diamond I lose like 5 in a row but it only takes like 2 to get back up. My rating wr is already lower than 50 which is just stupid becuz I had almost 70% in my first 80 battles
@worldly anvil I know, but one thing is win with help or lose with a decent match and other thing is to be last tank standing and having players that died in the first minute or that couldnt even reach 1k dmg with a tier 8 tank
I mean
Even though its a team game
In pubs and stuff
U gotta work with your team, and use them, at the same time
Their HP is important to you, so if theyre getting rushed, try to output as much damage as possible to the rushing enemies
So your team has a better chance of winning
Their damage doesnt matter as much as yours
;-;
Man I feel so attacked 30 games in a rating today and I have people on my team with 0 damage in every single game win or lose , But the enemy lowest has almost 1k damage.
@worldly anvil there’s only so much u can do when ur meds peek and almost die in the first 30 sec, or when the td covering u somehow dies b4 u
I have 4,300 points but all my teams the highest I seen was 3,6k while the enemy has 3 people over 4 k like how is this remotely fair
Yesterday it took me 30 battles to fall from 5k to 4.9k, was literally winning 1 out of every 5
"fair"
rating means nothing these seasons
@mossy badger i agree with you just cause im tired of the top players spamming the broken Vk Cruiser... they just cant stop winning...
no i mean a monkey that knows how to push buttons can be 1st place if it has more time than other players
Thats also true, im on holidays right now but the top players are every day spamming ratings lol and with this thing of "StayHome" everyone is spamming even more lol
just play in like December you’ll get the fearless ez
^^^^
okay guys remind me to tryhard ratings 4 months from now then
ok tryhard in 4 months from now @native marten
thank you @mossy badger
np
lol
this gamemode is broken
Got 2 dudes from bronze league while im from gold.
Why? Nobody knows
One of them had a T22 Med. 800 average and 35 wr on it
And i checked everyones stats
I was the only player with above average stats on my team, and the enemy team there was only 1 as well.
This is basically a 1v1 mode but each team has bots on them
The noobs want IS-6 Fearless so badly they spam ratings hard
Pls fix this mode, nobody should get bronze league teammates when their gold. My mate thats at diamond also gets bronze sometimes.
they cant make that a thing,as its to balance the rating points giving you an average,meaning a high one is likely to meet/have a long one
4 players without damage in my team...
It’s impossible to play this game be it random or rating if useless players aren’t removed.
You realized you just made it very ez to get roasted woth that
My chimera is so supportive, he obviously carried the game
@median wagon Hes a god
Can’t believe this teamwork
just got this awsome godlike player. He rushed a 3v1 and died. What a pure legend @median wagon
because who needs a player with 1k average dmg when you can get this legend with 94 average dmg
He was trying to help your ‘personal rating’ no doubt 😂
Not sure what's shown on video with Chimera?
His full HP?
Your miss because of hull travers?
Did he bump in to you?
duh
He reversed into me which made my tank turn
😁🍻
I mean
Ok?
Good for you, but
it finally happened
@mossy badger nah thats what you can say when he reaches 4k rating
:0
I reached 4k in like 7 games with my Lowe, honestly not hard
What if ratings score was based on base xp and not on winning the game?
Because these days it sucks massive cupola
What if ratings score was based on base xp and not on winning the game?
@gusty gust I rate that idea solid banana out of 10
@scarlet fox Well bananas kind of describe what ratings are like right now. But what do you think?
It's what I've said all along about ratings. The system rewards battle spam and damage at the moment. I think a month of ratings is too long and I would like to see a longer weekend of ratings (say Friday to Monday) in one tier only, tech tree only.
And then indeed base the rating points on XP with maybe a set reward for each spot in a team.
That's a solid idea, removing premium tanks will force people to actually git gud rather than spam Vk90 or Chieftains all day
Ratings is a 1v13. You are against enemies and also competing with your team to get as much damage as possible
I do not think that should be the case that you should be looking to farm as much damage as possible
to avoid rating battle spam being the main factor, another idea is where you introduce a hard cap on the ratings, say 5500 or something (it geniunely doesn't matter). and you let everyone keep the rating from the previous season. That way the highest players consistently stay at the top, average players will average out into the respective ranks. You introduce a hard win / loss system where everyone loses the same amount regardless (again the number actually doesn't matter, besides for mmr cases) and newer accounts are placed based on current placement system.
And for actual prizes, just introduce a minimum battle count to qualify.
@jagged dirge problem with a hard cap would be that people will stop playing once they reach that level
Even more so if you keep the ratings after a season
@scarlet fox i know I didn't explain this, but I'm referring to a hard elo in my system, so at the very highest, (going to use 5000 points as an example) you'll only be able to receive 1-6 points on average on a high level game (say 4800 points on average) so it's nearly impossible to reach the actual peak. Plus it only accelerates the reason why some people play, better matchmaking over all. And the rewards will be better distributed to not the most devout to the battle button.
That sounds logical indeed. I would like to see that tried by WG 👍
Also, a smaller time frame would probably make the pool of players a bit bigger, so MM actually has players to choose and spread.
I've seen differences of about 2500 rating points in match which is just too much
We can only hope WG actually takes advice from the community and so far I don't know if they are keen on that
I haven't seen those kind of games, but unbalanced matchmaker is pretty unfortunate.
lol just put +/-500 matchmaking in place
teams in rating are either
A: clueless guy who decided to check rating out after maxing his first tier 7
Or B: extreme spartan-level tryhard (usually on the enemy team)
A move away from farming as much damage would be appreciated. A hard win/loss system would put more strategy into games. Right now, it’s just a case of surviving as long as you can, and doing as much damage as possible, leading to people playing more passively and not wanting to make a play towards a win.
One problem WG has with matchmaking system as it is is that they prioritize speed over everything else and sacrifice many things for that
I don't think it does do that tbh, it doesn't blantantly throw the first 14people who queue in.
It at least tries to create "fair" games based on preexisying conditions
from what I’ve seen it tries to make teams based on the average rating but unfortunately since there aren’t that many ratings players, you can’t say, match 7 5k+ players with 7 5k+ players, instead the matchmaking is forced to just give you overall lower ratings players if your rating is high in order to bring down your team’s average rating to about that of the enemy team’s average rating
There isn’t enough incentive to play ratings unless if you have the time to end up at the top of the leaderboard, so people start tuning out of ratings.
As said above, the range of players rating in a game becomes larger as the matchmaker tries to make fair games with a smaller pool of players.
A temporary avatar and camo for anyone outside of the top of the leaderboards is just not enough for the average player to come back and do ratings again.
Isn’t ratings really active now because of the fearless reward
I haven’t seen much of a difference.
@median wagon this season there is barely any good players playing
Dont they want a poopootier premium?
So many t92 spammers
@restive dawn don't be mean to me but I want the tonk too :>
Guess for you got this month and next one then you got tank
i can almost do rating battles
im gonna tryhard 2 season and then the next will be semi-tryharding,
Yeah same here for most part need try 2 months then from there is really since all need top 30 or less for me at least on na sever.
also I want the fearless for the main reason being that I don't even have an IS6....
I want the fearless because it’s my IGN
Yeah I hope you enjoy the is 6 fearless
I’ll just assemble the certificate and then it’s gonna be a novelty
once the good players get the fearless rating is going to die down again and will force WG to "popularize it" by making stuff up like RBM/RBC etc.
Or they could add another tank you get, I don’t want it to be only the fearless
I mean, that can be interesting but there will definitely be people who would complain that they didn't get the tank.
Wg add the MS-1 as the rating reward
Yeah it guaranteed that sooner or later going add tank only get ratings
needs to be more rewards for gold and platinum players
thats definitely not hard at all to implement you could literally add like 5 lines of code and boom theres so much more incentive to play at least
or make it so diamond players get both the plat and diamond camos
@lean zenith if only that were the case lol
ok but one camo is not an incentive to play 50 battles
im talkin real rewards like at least credits and free exp
ye free xp would be nice
and once the skill tree is actually fixed and battle spammers cant get close to top 100 or something, then make gold rewards more generous to push people from gold to plat and plat to diamond
@mossy badger What mean by skill tree?
a little unclear but i mean when the rank is actually ranked in skill instead of battle spamming
Well do you mean pc version of ranked or more. Well skill can be hard to judge because not all tank are equal even if it only Tech tree tanks.
scroll up to what jibril and what martin g said
So what get at all players start same position only move if win or lose. The players win get higher points so not matter how games you play. Only winning matter is that right.
like season 1 yes
It good idea but not sure if how play out in real battle because it sounds more like pc in wot ranked.
in season 1 all the top players were actually good players
to the point where when you see a someone whos diamond ranked you'd actually be like "wow" diamond instead of "oh a diamond"
What made season 1 different from rest of season till now cause never care about rating so can explain to me.
there was no timegate which was great
and again ratings was playing to win rather than playing for as much damage as possible so you don't lose as many points
--> better team coordination
Was it same formula as it now or was different first season because time gate does mean player limited on point they could earn. Guess back then was not really power crept is now during rating.
I have a reward system to suggest -
Bronze league - avatar
Silver league - avatar + 5k fxp
Gold league - avatar, 500 gold + 10k fxp
Plat league - avatar, camo, 750 gold, 10k fxp
Diamond league - avatar, camo, 1k gold, 20k fxp, parts for a vehicle
And maybe wg u could make parts and charms universal so if you don’t get the action x from crates but u get 5 charms you can get the other charms from ratings
No way, literally no way wg would give that much gold for free. But if they did I guarantee you the number of people playing ratings would skyrocket.
Well they literally give you thousands of gold a month or whatever icr for just watching raid shadow legends ads so maybe they’d be willing to give you less gold for actually playing the game
It would be the easiest gold ever. Making gold is nothing and platinum is like 2 days of playing op tanks depending on how you calibrate
Not if they toughen ratings and make it skill based as suggested above
I think it’s a great suggestion, just doubt wargaming would do it, though I hope they do it or something similar
They won’t everyone knows, it was just a suggestion
@mossy badger im talkin real rewards like at least credits and free exp You already earn enough credits in rating. if you do a decent job in platinum you get 80K+. if you are playing like a Lowe or a rev you get 100k+. In diamond credits are even more abundant. Free xp on the other had is a good idea
Hi All
Professionals
@median wagon you’re lucky, in one of my battles four of my ‘team’ scored a big fat 0/zero and one of those players is in platinum too!
omg! i had that one time too
@pine falcon i mean then again a very popular and valid suggestion is to prevent premium tanks from getting in rating; so the rewards are on the brunt end after ratings is over rather than grinding in it
I love watching this channel
u mean u love watching stevo and cancracker enlighten your mind @autumn wave
:]
ok but like only diamond league players should be getting gold
ig
Unless make diamond so hard to get like only less .1 percent of players doubt ever give gold to any type of league for reach it.
y u downvote the two fen1x players @zenith trellis
bc they spat on him
its just coz they are in the same point range, if they are in the same clan doesnt matter
bruh
point range?
It’s Friday and this game is useless again. Teams are full of muppets no matter the tier
and there he goes again
every minute he speaks you gain 10 iq @crimson goblet
more intelligence also means you are easier to get affected mentally,maybe thats why i am mentally unstable..... 🤔
so you basically gave them a downvote coz they upvoted you? are you sane sir?
he didn't get enough cancracker in his life
remove Sheridan and T92E1 in this mode
And I don't think there's any need for an argument to justify to me
eh
At least I went up
Imagine still having a problem with sheridans and e1s
How were u the only oneto go up
Because they played poorly
@agile sphinx you know how yesterday we were talking about avatars signifying skill? There are more than 2. In twister season the teams that reached top 8 (or top 4) I don't remember exactly got a permanent avatar with their clan logo on it.
That’s only gonna make themselves more focused
There are 4/5 avatars than can signify some amount of skill
@pine falcon Huh I didn't really pay any attention to that lol, I think I've seen maybe one or two people clanless and with the challenges avatar but I can't remember ever seeing one of those avatars...
they only got pro avatars, what ur thinking of only some clans have like eg,no one this year received any tho @pine falcon
Where’s Stevo?
grinding ratings
Hi. How do I get to diamond? By grinding or just regularly playin 2~4games? I started gold 3.2k now I'm at plat 4.3k but I don't know if I can make it. I also don't want the fearless but I really wanna grind for those exp and credits after I got diamond so what tank should I play. Also, which tier is newbie friendly? I watch lots of vids and guides on yt and looking forward to your advice too
@ornate spoke playing casually, you’ll probably hit a wall between 4600-4900. I would reccomend getting to abt 4600, stopping for a few hours, then continuing so you don’t lose your mind.
How about the tanks? I'm clicking t44/t54/m4 and the pantera. Sometimes is6. I have met tier 10s with my t54 but I stopped playing tier9 after gettimg ammo rack..
The british td that 1tapped me*
You’ll probably want to stick with the pantera. Staying at one tier is generally better, especially with tanks that you are comfortable with, unless your just grinding camos.
Camo won't matter for me. I'll stick with the pant. Thanks :D
Sorry if i caused inconvenience. Does average damage from rating battles affect overrall average damage?
Np. The t44 is worse, in most situations, at least.
No inconvenience at all, lol.
No, average damage from ratings do not affect stats
Glad I could be of assistance
Aye you helped me out quickly thanks😆
Lol, it’s getting really late (I live in the states) so I might see you around, but not for a while, at least 😂
Goodnight 🙃
Sleep well👌
Same thing with me mate, proof the teams are just that bad
@slim acorn this is the ratings thread so anything posted needs to be ratings related 😉😊
oh
:v
said stevo who complains about MM here
Lol
MM is random, sometimes you get potatoes, other times you get unicums. It’s like rolling a dice.
Give Stevo mod so he can complain about MM and encourage others to do the same 🐀
MM is not random, it’s governed by the patent filed by WG in the US. You should check that out before posting nonsense. Unfortunately the rating MM didn’t escape the patent either so that’s why it’s similar.
What are the best rating tanks ? Need suggestions. I will build a gaming pc next month. I will push for diamond league next season so yeah...suggestions plz
T7 -> Smasher JPanther
T8 -> Prog 46 Chimera FV301 AX 252U WZ 112-2
T9 -> WT auf Pz IV british light T92E1
T10 -> pretty much all but team dependant tanks
T8 and above?
just play a tank you are good with, anything else is a bad suggestions
Ohhh I see
AX ,progetto 46 and T92E1 then. I have 57%+ in these and love them
Thanks @crimson goblet
it just makes the most sense to me. why recommend tanks when they might not even fit your playstyle. that seems a bit reckless in my eyes @junior flax
Ah I see. You have a point
Well, i mean, there is no one playstyle, each tank has their own playstyle, its just preference over which playstyle you do best in or your favourite
thats basically what i meant, whatever just fits himself and how he plays tanks
then say that lel
MM is random? in 50 years they havent been able to program any music player to play more than 5 songs out of 2000 on random so how have they masterd this one?
i dont get why people actually think mm is rigged, like wtf 😂 why would wg bother with your crappy results? they wouldnt benefit in the slightest from that, just play better instead of complaining towards others and pushing the fault away from yourself
MM is not random, otherwise we would have tier 1s against tier 10s. MM only looks at certain criteria, such as tank type and tier not any player statistics. The players you get is the random part, because the matchmaker doesn't look at that at all (unless you are playing tier 5 and below on EU or RU in which case it tries to keep people with more than 5k battles separate). The program simply doesn't look at that statistics, so it is completely random.
Thinking about it from a business point of view, it would make more sense for worse players to be given "better" MM so they win more, enjoy the game more and are more willing to spend money. This is ofc in the stupid scenario where WG cared enough to rig MM for people.
The first 5k battles are better, that’s why rerolls have weird stats
remind me in 20 mins that I have to post something here
@pine falcon
I've said it many times if u want good mm start playing on tinder or something not here ffs
oh ye. Give me a sec to finish the match
Just a short summary of the battle before the conclusion and my point. In this battle we see that the ISU and I are on nearly the same points. As seen in the screenshots ISU did 3K (he did not camp but was second line). I did 1K dmg (was too slow to get any other damage out). However I gained almost equal (and more) points that the isu which is due to the 2.4K assisted damage. And that brings me to the conclusion.
Both and and ISU are almost on the same points. We gain basicsally the same points. His total damage (done by him and assisted was 3211) my damage (done by me and assisted is 3347). What I am hinting is that assisted damage is equal to regular damage meaning that instead of trying to HE pen the tank, you can for example go for the track and get the enemies entire HP pool as assistance damage.
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/551376189089120256/734080198357680219/IMG_20200718_191229.png?width=734&height=413
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/551376189089120256/734080198575915078/IMG_20200718_191212.png?width=734&height=413
Tell me what you think of this "speculation".
well thats basically how gaining xp works, so your right on that one
some mod pin this maybe so people stop complaining about points earned ^
thats why meds or lights with good dpm are often the best at grinding points bc spotting assist damage is so easy along with your own
and heavies dont benefit from blocking say 10 shots or something
@pine falcon You think you could ask the ISU what xp he got from that game and compare that as well? (because you cant see other peoples base xp in ratings right?)
ill see what I can do
@pine falcon sounds like XP based points to me too. Not sure it reduces merely to damage only, but it must be a large part. Probably cap reset, capture points... would increase your rating points.
This is probably what some struggle to get when they think that they should get rating points on a lose only because they made more damage than their team.
what gives exp is:
damage, kills,cap points earned/reset, supremacy points(massive for xp),rare medals and spotting dmg aswell as critical hits,so module dmg(? i think, might be wrong on that one)
@crimson goblet i dont feel like cap in encounter gives any exp
it does but only very slightly
From wut I see rating is determined by xp and what ur current rating is
Well, the overall “award” system in WG in terms by xp (I.e. mastery classes, medals)
@crimson goblet wait? So like creitical engine damage (ie the icon becomes red) gives you base xp?
Ig since it counts as module dmg
“I've said it many times if u want good mm start playing on tinder or something not here ffs”
I doubt that the majority of WG’s player base is legal for Tinder anyhow
I doubt the majority of the people here meet discord ToS but here they are
What joke is is that enemy team has 4 diamond players in which 3 of them are over 5.5k points against 4 diamond players that are between 5k and 5.1k, where is the balance there....
I mean, it cant be that bad
yea but r any of the people in high diamond for Na actually good players anymore
most comp players won't even bother with an IS-6 and those who do have already gotten it
lets see not gonna name any names but among top 10 they include someone who spams lucky player, a tier 8 grinder, an extremely toxic espanol man, and.....i havent even heard of 3-4 of them ever b4 what the
Lol same for EU, it’s just people who spam broken tanks
Ooooof ^ he is bigger detective than Sherlock Holmes
Ok?
No not you, I’m talk about abc, he is big brain detective
playing like 10 battles with each of them and you can already know what you're gonna get
its the 7 deadly sins encompassed in each of them smh
@mossy badger yeah man that’s impressive memorizing so many people respect.
i wouldn't want to remember them its just scarred in my head
ill give it another few weeks and maybe ill forget about blitz
I’m give up on rating because too time consuming for me. I only play few battles a day now
eh if you can just don't play at all
there's nothing really to do anyways
That’s true, I mainly play in tourneys now for fun
And yeah a lot of people I see with the diamond avatar aren’t very good tbh
season 1 was the only time when even platinum players were respected in some sort
Yeah a lot of diamond avatar player I see are low-mid 50 winrate :/
People are hilariously toxic when they lose in ratings, especially the leaderboard players
^ Yeah too much toxicity also true,
what if I tell you I only behave when I know people on the enemy or my own team
Isn’t that basically everyone?
Yeah I think that’s everyone
Oh... well ... toxicity is in everyone
Ratings is apparently competitive as stated by WG, so swearing, begging the team to win and spamming broken tanks is competitive?
huh thats any comp playlist in any big game
No I think random battle are more competitive than rating since it count for stat
I’m confuse why people toxic in rating battle when it not count for stats
in competitive you try to get the biggest advantage you can get even if its gamebreaking (like ra1d and fbi during spring season)
I hate when people start rating matches when they know they have lots of ping
and the stat system is wack for ratings
i dont like it
it makes your stats wack when you try to break it down
or one example is that man with "100% wr in 2k" battles in NA
Yeah the people that win 1 game in random battle then spam ratings 100% winrate 🤣🤣
It’s much harder to win in ratings than pubs, so I don’t think it should affect stats
then make it separate from career battle # as it's misleading af
Leaderboard players are only rocket spammers
Yeah it misleading and some people play 1 game and have 100 winrate 🤔🤔
@median wagon currently I am a leaderboard player (29th currently) and I am spamming Lowe and WZ120gft
Wz120 🤔🤔
broken
rockets are a bit out of meta now. The current tier 9 spammed tank is K91
Somehow it’s so hard to pen K-91 through the tracks for me
Also, seems like hardly anyone is playing ratings this season, you’re at 5.3k and 29th, which is really high
Yeah because rating is too time consuming and not rewarding
the climb is super easy currently. Just today ( or should I say yesterday as its 4.12 am) I climbed around 125 points (note my rating is high so points aren't obtained so easy nor are matches found fast)
I’m only at 4.6k, hopefully might reach 4.7k tomorrow
Good luck, hope you reach it^
spam german heavies in tier 8. Should get it easily.
Just barely 5k should get me at least 15 parts, this ratings is really inactive compared to last season
yeah... yet these are people at 6K already
No life sweats?
I grinded to Diamond once. Literally sapped days out of my life. Never doing it again. Least I got a camo for my e5 tho
This game isn’t worth putting anything into it, be it time or money as it’s not providing a fair playing field and neither a pleasant gaming experience due to non existent team play, in a team game above all...
YeS!
Then quit. If you think it's unfair, why play?
@bleak crest and of course you've should meet the mods as well ^^
you can also be the one teamplayer in your team
And support 2 team members that stick together while we meet all 7 reds and the other 4 camp where they are and wait for the outcome... Too many times this happens in a row. It’s like it was planned. Over and over again. So I lose 20-30 points in those games while I win 20 in 4K games. Amazingly I win more of those...
There’s something wrong with ratings and it needs fixing, but nobody seems to care.
@bleak crest Why are you still playing the game then?
Also you said you do not care about the rating so what is the point of playing
I don’t care about that number associated with ratings as it doesn’t mean anything. It should enable me not to meet certain types of players but it’s not the case therefore it means nothing.
Because I have invested in it
You are not enjoying it, the game rather frustrates you and you are playing it only because you have invested some money into it, right?
I’m not enjoying it on weekends and nothing is done to fix that. In ratings it’s possible but there seems to be no will to do it.
Ah, so you want to win 100 percent of the time and you expect teamwork from people all over the world
@bleak crest you bought entertainment. From what you have written here it seems that you have exhausted the entertainment that you got from that purchase. If you aren't enjoying yourself it is time to move on.
And to be clear your return on your "investment" is your entertainment value. If you aren't entertained then you aren't getting a return on that investment. At some point you need to cut your losses.
How very convenient. Instead of looking into a problem and maybe finding a solution to improve the situation, the attitude is take it or leave it. Long term that’s not good business.
Improve what? Million of players?
You think you are so good yet you struggle to pass the 4k mark, I guess it is very fair. If you were playing as good as you always tell others, you would be the best since day 1
Improve the system obviously, how points are awarded and so on. And there aren’t millions of players.
The system works fine for me ¯_(ツ)_/¯
same here, if you don’t wanna play, get out
Figures aren't necessarily accurate but I doubt they would be 99million off 🤷♀️
Why do you think you should be placed higher than your actuall "skill" ? @bleak crest
Why do I lose 3-500 points on a weekend in ratings, especially after my premium account expired? I didn’t say I want to win 100% of the time. I want a level playing field and not having players that don’t really belong in certain battles.
idk, try not losing?
There is one question neither stevo nor cancracker have answered. What rating do you think you deserve?
I deserve 10000 but matchmaking is so unfair
life of unfair get over it
@white spruce U just nab git gud and carry and you can get to 10k rating like me ez
If you are losing anything close to 500 points in that short of a timeframe, there is performance issues with yourself.
LOL
He is getting paid for watching his games and getting him low roles etc
No it’s because he hasn’t bought a premium tank
Ah yes, rigged MM.
Ol’ reliable.
Suddenly he is gone
@muted shuttle They like to disappear when you start using logic against them
Or whenever someone asks what rating they think they should be able to get to
I think that some people are better suited for single player games...
Or none at all
Good joke. I'm watching MotoGp
You could have answered the question...
Because my team underperformed. They don't listen, they split, they camp. The whole weekend on and on
there's also a player that thinks players wr is decided the moment they start playing
you born as a 40er, 50ers, 60ers, and so on and you stay that way the rest of the time you play
let me guess you're the first one to die?
If you are losing up to 500 points on a single weekend, that isn’t just teams being bad. Thats you
Because I have invested in it
@bleak crest didn’t you once say that players who buy stuff get 10-15% higher wr because of rigged premium mm and similar stuff?👀
That pay regularly and a serious amount. Not 10 € once a year
How about for once you actually start looking at your own performance, rather than criticizing the rest of your team consistently. You might learn something and climb
As you invested money in this game anyways, then can you to some extent be considered as benefiting from this rigged mm granted by cash?
Learning is overrated
Wait, according to his own « rigged premium mm » theory, then cancracker, as a 60% player, would have been a 45% player if he did not spend any money on this game?🤔
I probably benefited whe I bought the t34 for that ratings season. Now the tank is just ridiculous. Doesn't win a thing... Something was turned off for it.
half a brain maybe
Because my team underperformed. They don't listen, they split, they camp. The whole weekend on and on
@bleak crest Can you finnaly realize you are playing a game usually played on mobile, there is no game let alone mobile game where are all players good, I hope you didn't expect twister teams in normal battles...
I expect the same teams as during the week and the rating system to work and keep bad performers out of higher rating games
Well, i have not met any 2000 points in (platinum) rating, just a fact, random mode is for some reasons RANDOM so there is no system to get bad players out, If is it anying you, you can just press delte the game, and that will end your suffering.
@bleak crest Or you can just buy smasher, and bring the suffering to your enemies :D.