#rating-battles
1 messages · Page 36 of 1
Mine is fine too
@languid lintel because he have just finish these calibration on this game
I think there may be hackers in this game. I finished last season with platinum and received the corresponding camo and prizes for platinum. Couple weeks later all of that was removed and was replaced with diamond camo and prizes. My theory is that some games were lost due to hacking and my rating was being adjusted.
when you just can't read... last season - Twister season the diamond cammo (black and red) was the ONLY cammo available for both diamond and platinum league. The fact that the very first rating cammo (goldish brown) was given out was a mistake by WG.@ornate spoke just saying - next time it is a good idea to read
No it used to be both diamond and plat had the brown camo. Then they rolled out a red one for diamond. But whatever it’s an upgrade anyways so I’ll take it
It used to be like that like half a year ago
its hard for people that cant read
The IQ is over 9000
Ratings stats seem rather fantastic after the update.
Could also add avg stats per tier
For the camo is it 50 battles total or 50 battles in a single tank?
You can get 1 camo for each tier tank. The requirement to get a camo on each tier tank is 50. Most played tank in each tier gets a camo (4k, or 5k camo). So in total, you gotta play 200 battle in rating. 50 for each tier. Or if you want just one tank to get it, say is7, just 50 battles in t10 with is7 being the dominant tank played (while being in 4k or higher)
@still latch If let's say i play IS-6 or T34 ? Do i still get the camo?
Play 50 battles in one of the two and be in 4k or 5k league before season ends
Alright ok. Thks
I am sick of ratings.... everyone is rolling in their foches or 215b and just ruining gameplay for meds
rating system broken
I don't even bother with tier x, It's horrid up there, way harder to carry
Lol no it's not
But hey, I'm use to playing tanks that aren't completely broken and outclass their tier
Possibly bc I don't have tons of experience in tier x yet
@bleak cliff did wg announce there was going to be gold prizes last season when you won
Damn.. seemed like not many ppl knew bc u couldn't find out
There's barely any news about prizing. It's only at the start and end of the season
Yeah Ik about this season I'm like top 10 rn, I believe I pm you in game but never got a reply /:
Never got a pm I don't think
All is good, is your guy's discord public?
For pncr? Yeah
Ahh I found it
Rating battles end at 23 pm, right? So at what time do they start again in the morning?
Depends on the server you are playing in
Eu
the break during the night is either 9 or 10 hours
Nvm, I eventually got into ab battle. Seems like the break on eu server is from 23 to 8 o clock. Well, I just waited 540 minutes, but now I know.
@coral basalt 540 mins queue?
Was in the queue the whole time ratings were closed
540 mins divided by 60 is 9 hours
@restive dawn first of all he said 540. Also 540 divided by 60 is 9.
He queued when rating was closed?
I have a big tip: let people consolidate the win, so if you reach 4K or 5k you can keep playing. Now i reached 4K i am afraid i fall back so i stopped playing rating when actually i don’t really wanna stop...
Oh and don’t close rating at 23h in the eu
YES please. Let us lock in the rating if we want, and then continue playing without affecting points.
That literally defeats the whole purpose of ratings...
So what is the purpose then?
The top players can still fight for the better prizes and glory, but for the rest getting the camos is the only incentive. Apart from getting tougher matches.
Since the rewards for rating battles are so bad currently, it's no wonder people stop playing after reaching the 4k or 5k mark. Thus no wonder there's a lack of players too.
Better still would be to award the camos based on your season high. Then there would be no reason to stop playing after reaching 4k/5k.
People would still stop regardless
People would stop their rating and then keep battling to destroy for others.
This is the reason why the incentive should run throughout the season. Like better rewards for missions completed during ratings.
It should be highest rating reached, but as long as ur not too far below it (like 350 or so to prevent clubbing), the rewards depend on ur highest rating reached
Also I bet ratings is rigged, it’s not ok when you do 3k+ dmg every battle but still stuck at 4.2-4.3k rating
3k damage isnt much to gain points, especially if it's a loss. And most rating points are based off XP not damage, hurting those who just like to farm damage
Im just saying that i reached 4K and i am stopping now to keep my prizes, while actually i want to keep playing. And i think there are many out there who do the same and that is a pity.
The quality of the gameplay on rating battles is nothing better than random battles so I don't see a point in playing them once you reach plat/diamond league
I think the quality is better, the players are way better then in random. Thats why i like to keep playing.
It's really not
You get ocasionally another good player but others are still trash
And I belive there should be a skill cap in ratings because it's easy to get into diamond if you have enough time, bad players get carried into high rating but don't belong there
hi
Where can we see the number of battles in a rating season per vehicule pls? I don't understand the new interface
if its hard for one to reach 4k its thier problem i mean reaching 4 and 5k isnt hard at all and even without playing all day long it isnt hard
#rating-battles and #tourneys-discussion get spammed with the weirdest things...
So I got a question how low could this game's rating would be, I mean the number
1000? or below 1000?
Do we no longer need 50 games in Ratings to get the camoflage? I am plat with less than 20 games, but when I look at my rating screen it tells me that I will get camo at the end of the season. Has this changed?
Notice the text at the bottom.
very interesting Rating arithmetic and match making mechanism, I set the game in rating battle as afk program. But you know what, until the window of rating battle closed last night, the rating level of that account was steadily preserved around 2200, I cannot get any further in approaching the bottom line of 2000. Wow, cannot believe it.
the total number of that account's rating game was 51, calibrated as 2800, However, in the following 41 games as afk, the rating place only dropped less than 600. This is insane! So many people on this game, play bad and could get around 1800 rating place, but if you just stay there and doing nothing, you shall just receive even better consequences, free credits and free exps.
so the conclusion is being AFK is better than suck it up or just yolo 😂 on this game
on the current version
The lowest I have seen was 1184 rating (ranked 75000th player) on EU.
Eww
@humble lark thank you for your screen
Thats way to much profit for a losing team
@restive dawn I don't see why it would change either, but then I don't see why it tells me at the bottom of the ratings page that "at the end of the season you will receive a camoflage for your favorite tank" instead of adding the normal qualification "once you've played 50 games."
where can I sign up for testing 6.6 on the euro server?
@versed plank get 2000 youtube followers first
<@&481447501690568709> sorry to bother but may you moderate this chat more often. It literally gets flooded with all of those screenshots and a sentence attached to each one of them like "Wow, MaTchMakINg iS soO bAD" or "LoOk hoW I CarRIed ThIs batTLe". Please!
👍
Umm...what? I never named or shamed anyone
Posting a screenshot showing people doing 0 dmg and moaning about afk players was naming and shaming mate
I don't recall talking about the 0s at all
It was a different player that I was upset at, and I didn't even say who
I did say afk but I was not talking about other players being afk. I said that someone on my team was telling everyone that I was afk despite me having massive damage dealt
Sorry but I get a bit upset when someone spends the match telling everyone how bad I am and that I'm the most worthless player on team when I've already got 5k+ damage at that point
Updated Case #12129
@long spindle rating games are not included in player statistics. his winrate and average damage do not change. so the result of the battle doesn't matter (win or lose) so since you deleted my sample pictures that had hidden player names I will write again. please let the player get points for in-game activity. if he is a noob and you accidentally were on the winning team and his result is 300 dmg on tier 10. such a player should receive -50 points. The player on the losing team who has 3000 damage should get the same points as the player on the winning team, for example 30-50 points. players do not choose partners in the battle so they should be accounted for individually and not as a team. this is a very logical and fair solution.
Eh...sorta but not really
If you reward individual play over team play then players may act in ways that would harm their teams ability to win so that they can boost their personal rating. For example if the enemy is capping and there are a ton of enemies in the area nobody may reset the cap because they want to stay alive and boost their rating while someone else resets cap.
That being said I do think someone who performs exceptionally well on a losing team should get just as much if not more reward than someone who does nothing on a winning team.
War Robots has all of its matchmaking based on rating and the way they decide rating change is based entirely on ranking within each team with the top 2 out of 6 players on the losing team still gaining rating. Maybe a hybrid between war robots and blitz rating methods would work
@tacit crescent rating battles has his own player rating system, which certainly contains not only damage but also spots or capturing bases, it probably depends on the type of tank too.
how do you boost your rating
By winning
Rating shouldn't let you get tons of points when loosing and neither should you loose some if you win
30 wr players buy a prem tank and come in rating battles to put your rating down every time when u r at 3998 😩
@fallen mortar why ?
You do well in a loss and get a few points, I'm ok with that but you shouldn't get more then 10 or 15 since you still lost and getting to 5k should be at least challenging, right now getting to 4k is way to easy and I meet tons of 40%ers with over 4k ranking
@fallen mortar precisely because they have little damage in the game and still get a positive number of points. so they know that it is enough to play a lot.
Its not working that well if you loose and do no dmg you loose way more points then you gain by doing no dmg and winning
yes, but if you do 300 dmg at tier 10 you should get a negative number of points regardless of whether you won or lost. then there will be no players with 40% wr who have a 4k ranking
but its stupid since if you play team reliant tanks like squishy Tds it occurs that you wont do much if your team just yolos and dies regardless at what ranking they are
it is me or ranked are completly broken
i play with people that die in under 2 min over and over...., i just cant carry anyone and anything from tier 7 to 10, impossible
This season of rating battles was the most difficult so far for me. But I finally got to 5k
Just gonna say:
If you see a tier 9 or 10 premium that isn’t in a real clan, don’t trust them. 90% of the time they will be trash cans
Define "real clan" 🍿
ratked with these teams so fun so far, not even 1 minute already 2 dead, another minute passed 2 other dead, 99% of my battles in a nutshell....
ratings is just pubs but more "balanced"
@keen canopy renown clan? So that people that have knowledge of the game know that ur good? Idk
@maiden rain Im in FTC-1 and play my AMX 30 B most of my tier 10 ranked matches. Still I know what I do. But is FTC verry renowned? I dont think so
I don’t know them anyway 😅
You know ur clan is renowned when people say hi ig @quaint thunder
@quaint thunder very nice 1300 avg dmg on AMX 30 B
@ornate spoke yes but I dont f care
@ornate spoke i have learned my leason already. Once I was all about stats. Must get winrate up. Must win. Got angry when my teammates fcked up. I nearly got a heart attack. Now I play for fun. And now I have both more fun and my health doesnt deteriorate
The biggest noobs arent the guys with low winrates: that jonour goes to the guys who say they are noobs. It isnt about winning at all costs. It is about having fun (and maybe pay the salary of the devs but lets not talk about that)
So I would like to request @everyone not to go after stats. That someone isn't that good in the game doesn't mean he or she should stop playing. Let others have some fun to
Someone that isn't good shouldn't play ranked 😅
It's supposed to be skillful noobs are only tolerated because we don't want to wait for ages
^ It would be alright if the points system was fixed so it required skill to get to 4/5k but all it takes is time which completely defeats the point of the game mode
About time the ratings points system was brought into the 21st century,time again this happens,get in the top three score but get let down by a noob team & ‘my’ rating goes down too,even after this time achieving the highest score out of both teams but ‘my’ rating goes down! #notmyrating
@sonic sedge doing the highest damage on ur team on a loss is not guaranteed to not drop your rating, stop thinking like that
erm I wasn’t ‘thinking like that’ as I know it doesn’t always..Proof of what I typed is as above though! Hence why the scoring system should change otherwise ‘your’ rating means absolutely nothing!
They need to give more rating gain to the top 1 or 2 on reds
what is this, u call this fair WG, i try playing defensively, offensively, take hits for the teammates, i scout, i switch vehicle type, i switch tier, i flank, i trade, what an absolute joke unfair rating, allowing someone go above me, even though i play longer, now the rating is almost over now i lose my place, i hope u enjoy your unfair rating cause teams these days are not even balance. Even do very high damage and still lose and lose my rating points, now i lose my rank that i used to have. This really annoys me that fact that i switch tanks, tier, class type, how unreal this game mode is, i thought this was the game mode for me but, no just keep giving unfair advantage, look at how many times i lose
Maybe +5 points to top player and -5 to bottom player
Balances out to the same points for the team overall
Not a huge impact on anyone, but for players who consistently rank top of team they get a small boost and are less likely to go negative while players that are afk or Yolo rush get a small penalty
if i had a low winrate, like a 46% winrate i guarantee i would have more wins than lose as a high winrate player
look at the image that proof
Sadly I think that's accurate... playing on an old account I may struggle for 60% on a tank but then playing on a new account with the same tank at about the same number of battles in that tank I get 70% win rate
i really wish winrate didn't exist in this game so WG can't keep making u lose on purpose cause they obviously go by winrate base on the image i just put on
i played 2 more battles now it all defeat good job WG 😃 how unreal can u be😄
Stop playing is all I can say. Just come back another time.
ok i hope tomorrow it better the opposite, like keep winning consistently, cause it makes me want to have a refund, i didn't pay to keep losing i pay for both win and lose, not lose only
welp it better happen to the guy that pass me bc he kept winning, so tomorrow it better be he keeps losing and i keep winning then, if u say it happens to everyone
I never said it’s gonna work out for you like that I’m just saying everyone gets loss streaks there’s not much you can do about it
welp ima see tomorrow😡
New accounts have sadety mm. You're supposed to be put against other new players and bots. (Occasionally you'll still be slammed against people with more battles if there isn't enough people in the safety que) Plus the more you play the tank the better you get. Could explain why you have a higher wr in the same tank when you make a new account
I'm seeing a pattern. You need to know when to walk away in ratings, I always seem to win a streak or win 2 out of 3 for a while and then it goes straight to loss streaks, usually when I continue after losing 2 or 3 in z row it turns into 4 or 5+, its then I just walk away for the day or come back a couple hours later bc if I dont i lose any progress I've made before, sure it's hard and annoying I even have to do that, but it's the only way I can stay positive some days @ivory bone
Supreme_Pickle,yep you’ve got it,I’ve played over 70k battles & there IS a pattern,you win a few then you’re deliberately made to lose just as many no matter what you do!
My pattern is win1 time loss2 time
What?
yes
Read pinned messages
yeah, that's a #screenshots image.
On the actual topic of Rating Battles, they do need some changes:
#1 -
A) Locked until 1000 battles played; tier 7 and 8 only
B) Locked until 2500 battles played; tier 7-9 only
C) Locked until 5000 battles played; all tiers allowed
#2 - Rewards changes
Scale credits and experience gained and lost to be weighted more heavily on:
D) Rating earned/lost and overall rating
E) Ordinary + a % bonus according to average ratings
F) Removed repair and ammunition costs for battles
Choose one answer from each of the above
I would choose C but also add the condition that the player needs to have researched a tier 10 vehicle.
I would disagree. Recently, Wargaming sold 1 million free experience. That's 1-2 free tier 10 tanks right away. And what if we suck at tier 10 tanks, and just want to chill at tier 7-9?
yeah, I see what you mean there, may have to make some edits on the post
@tawdry ingot I think it is not the point
There is some sort of mutually excluding demands in (1) creating more and harder conditions to enter ratings and (2) whinning because there are not enough players to balance the teams properly based on 'skill'.
the problem is more likely the lack of skilled players xD
@pearl shale I mean I can actually go back and forth between the accounts and have an epic win streak and easy battles on one and struggle on the other despite using the same tank with the same equipment and the older account that I struggle on is the one that has maxed out crew skills
But what is that accounts total battle count?
A) wrong channel B) naming and shaming C) that’s gonna get a mute if you don’t remove it because mods @celest hound
Just black out names and y’all good. It’s fine, being a newer member you make mistakes
Post that to #screenshots
thats not naming and shaming
that praising
I deleted some messages
its 10 game for the camo or 20 ?
50
Ratings are a joke......
Literally getting steamrolled every bloody time.....
Getting unequal teams in both Ratings and Firepower.....
Read pinned messages
Rating rewards are already distributed on the EU server... wow that was FAST
Our country internet closed 14 days and i didnt get diamond league ( 4600 point) 😂 😂
So I got platinum for my rating and I didn't get my camo on my SP I C
So I had to do 50 games ;-;
Just at tier 7 m8. You can just do 26 games in the SP and 24 in the Smasher 🙂
I played tier 8 mostly with T28 Deffender. Now its appearance is unique. So I never got my gold league camouflage for tier 8
Camo is only for 4k+ as far as I remember
I did get the gold league avatar
Yeah you're only supposed to get a temp. avatar
When do you get the camouflage after you reach Platinum/Diamond league?
After you've played 50 battles in a particular tier, and on your most played tank on that tier
To expand (because this confused the heck out of me)
Play 50 battles at tier (X) in ratings. The tank you want to have the camouflage in has to have the most battles at the tier.
Was that you that was confusing my exhausted brain earlier? RIP
I feel insulted
What’s wrong with rating battles on weekends? It becomes nearly impossible to win, games are annoying and very different from those during the week. The game is simply unplayable. Anyone at wargaming care to explain?
Received avatar but not the camo.. R u drunk again?😂
mhmmm this camo looks pretty thicc on isu
@ornate spoke how do you get this screen ? i can't...
Profile->rating->scroll down
@balmy hollow Ty i missed thé fact we Can scroll down
When will rating be back up?
never
Eh when the next season starts
Which is to say in December, give it until the 5th probably
@ornate spoke did you get the camo?
😂
na
I like black camo more!!
i do 60 game in tier 10 with 20 game on maus and 10 game in anthoner tank and dont work so. i leave the ranked tottaly buged and unless
Its 50 games for every tier tank. If you wanted it for your maus, you needed to play 50 battles in that tank. Then 50 battles for m4a1, then 50 battles for amx 13 57. Its not bugged.
So all in all, if you want a plat or diamond camo for every tier available in rating: First, you need to be between 4000 to 5000+ points. Second, Play 50 games in tier 10, 50 games in tier 9, 50 games in tier 8 and 50 games in tier 7. So 200 battles total
@still latch no. Direct quotation "These camos can be installed on the Tier VII–X vehicles you used to fight the most rating battles in the series. You can get up to four warpaints for the corresponding league: one for each eligible vehicle tier, as long as you have fought at least 50 battles in vehicles of that tier." Meaning that you can play 30 battles in Maus and 20 battles in T110E4 (for example) and you will receive the cammo on the Maus as it is the most played tank
Then he obviously didnt hit 4 to 5 k rating if he didnt get camo :/ and ree ping
or he didn't hit those 50 battles per tier
The new tank in the shop tier X FV217 confirms that WG doesn't want better selection of players in rating battles. this is not good news for experienced players. the number of noobs in your team will increase. the number of complaints about match making will increase too.
Except of course if enough good/skilled players participate in ratings so that the rating selection can be effective.
We can dream...
@next gull if there are more noobs then the popularity of the game decreases even more.
@ornate spoke removing bad players from ratings do not add good players to them. WG's aim is to have more players, presumably. Any suggestion going against that is pointless. We should find a way to promote ratings AND accomodate the presence of bad players.
I know many disagree, that's ok with me.
Good words
I belive it should be in wg's interest to keep the good players in the game more than getting more trash ones. But I guess they pay more
@next gull great idea. add stock tanks to the game it will be even more players
Gallabru has a point. If no one enjoys rating then it is probably because they don't feel "welcome" in it and most of the time that is because good players get annoyed with having not so good teammates by their side or bad players getting annoyed as a unicum totally outplayed them. And as rating doesn't effect stats why no make something like echelons - top (60+ wr), middle (50+ wr) and lower (50- wr) and climb in the leagues (bronze, silver, gold, platinum and diamond like they are now. I do understand that will cause horrific queues but this way a lot of moaning would be prevented about people not playing with the same skill leveled players. (And yes, I know this claim is mad)
it's hard to win a rating battle when you fight alone in team with noobs, which is why most of the best players still prefer platoons and random games. so I suggest adding platoons to rating battles. change the score that rewards activity and noob punishment in battle.
Toons In rating is not a good idea.
Platoon in rating would be the only thing that would keep me playing the game and actually make this game playable
You can play toon in random battles lol
Ik but in random battles players are just miserable
Toons in ratings are a bad idea they would let idiots get even higher rankings
Toons in ratings is and will always be a stupid idea since one team could get a 40%er toon and the other one gets a 60% toon
It isn't even hard to climb the ratings ladder alone so I don't get how you have such problems with it
@fallen mortar it's not difficult for you and you still can't cross the platinum league, so it's hard
if something does not change, the number of players in rating battles will not increase. this is only a suggestion for adding platoons because they are very popular among the best players.
It's not difficult to get high rating and that was not my point.
I simply want to enjoy playing in a platoon without worrying about winning and stats or whatever
Platoons in ratings will just make rating based even less of skill which is the opposite of what we want. 2 good players who only play in a platoon will obviously win more and so their rating doesn't show their individual skill. If you want to play in a platoon then play normal battles. If you don't want to worry about stats then play in training rooms.
What exactly am I supposed to play in training rooms lmao
Meh I don't care anymore really, done with blitz anyways
@ornate spoke I could've easily got to diamond but I didn't want to or did you see me playing 50 battles in T10 no so I wasn't paying to much attention to ranked or the game at all
@ornate spoke Do whatever you want, and if you are done with blitz don't try and ruin an already dying game mode with your suggestions 🤷♀️
Ruin? Lmao
Sorry how would platoons in rating make it better? If you are that desperate and lonely just do countdowns...
Ratings already had platoons and they were much better then
Right now no one is playing them. Why?
Sorry why were they much better? It ruined the whole point of rating which is to show your skill. If I can toon and get to 5k easily in 50 games or toon and get to 1k in 50 games then there is clearly an issue. People don't play ratings because there are no worthwhile rewards and the teams are the same as normal battles except you don't have to worry about your 40% platoon being massacred by the red 60% platoon or vice versa
It definitely can't get worse than they are now. 25 players at max in the same time
Good players had a purpose of playing it, the game mode had about as much players as the random mode
Now they're flooded with trash players and tryhards who want some free gold
Oh I see, so you would go for the gold without trying hard.
Ratings is literally ment for people to try, but there's not much point due to the system in place in terms of incentive
No I would want an enjoyable game mode, I don't have 6 hrs per day to play ratings
Ratings is by no means enjoyable for a player that wishes to play casually
Just wait for realistic or whatever other gamemodea come out or just play regular battles
It can get a lot worse, especially if you put platoons in. Ratings is the step between tournaments and normal games and it is meant to be competitive, if you aren't prepared to put time in then you won't get rewards. If you want to play in a platoon, then just play normal battles
For some1 who doesn't want to have to worry about stats they were enjoyable, now they're trash and dead
What?
Ratings is literally about stats 🤦♀️
If you are using it as a place to play without affecting your WR then you are one of the reasons ratings is dying...
That doesn't make any sense
But platoons in ratings ment easier rigging capabilities as well as unbalanced teams and most likely longer queue times for the platoons. It was a good decision to remove them
Ratings are about what you can do. Bringing a friend along with you negates the point.
^^
Blaming toons being removed from rating as the reason why you’re done with blitz and that you want a mode where you don’t have to care about winning and stats.... re read that and see how dumb that looks. Btw there are also tournaments you could join if you don’t want to “worry about winning or stats” lol
so since the rules of rating games do not change, the number of players will be very small still
Can we make rating battles for those of us with 10,000 battles or more?
If they make rating battles available for people with 10k+ battles the game mode will become more ded. The amount of rerolls and people who “just started the game” has skyrocketed at-least in the matches I’ve played now.
Not that a queue with people that have 10000+ battles only solves anything anyways.
Seeing as how discussion has been about the mode and how it's dying i figured i might as well reiterate why i dont play the mode myself. The only reason that I might bother playing is to snag a mission once in a while.
- Lack of incentive.
- Player toxicity. Open trash talking, racism, bigotry, armchair generals, etc
- Player quality is no better than normal games and may in fact be worse (at least when I've played it).
The only reason why i played ratings before was to farm Sparse Parts in my T-54 since it was an almost guaranteed bottom tier match (killing 2 above tier tanks nets a medal worth an instant 1k SP on top of any other earnings). Now I just see Ratings as a waste of time, personally. About the only appeal i see are for the people who have time to farm points to rank high and for those who want a camo on their tanks. Oh, and tank grinds if you don't want to "ruin" your stats in public matches.
I play for camos and credit grind and tank xp grinding. Ive used ratings to grind quite a few of my tank lines.
So it has its uses
I have no incentive to play ranking matches... but if we made them 10k battles as a mandatory requirement... I would play them when the newbs invade the servers... which is a lot right now.
I am so tired of seeing players with less than 1000 battles playing higher tiers... it ruins the game.
I don't think you understand what consequences come with that. As Moe previously stated on your previous post, a big part of rating players are rerolls who bought a tier 8 premium OP tank and only play rating as they don't want to ruin their 70% wr
are we... defending rerolls now?
Rating matches have a lot of incentives, credit and experience bonuses, no negative career stats, help in grinding the next tier vehicle up and you get some nice camos. They're not useless. And rerolls are there own thing, so meh.
@tawdry ingot I haven't said I am defending them but on the EU server they are about 40% of the rating playerbase
It's harder to carry in ratings because there are more try hards that want to win and that's fine if you feel mistreated because the enemy got a super uni get gud and become a super uni as well
New season hype
I firgot but what r the gold reqards for top 10
Hi, I noticed a little problem! I was 8th in the rating and I had to receive 3k gold and I only received 500 gold
@patent pier
😅
🤔
yep
Was it always like that? Because last ratings I saw 4th and 5th get 5k
ready to grind to diamond league in a few hours
ready to grind to diamond league in a few hours and calibrate at 2k
they only give good gold rewards when they have 2 month seasons @covert temple
spring season and twister season
that's why I usually stop at 5k on 1 month seasons
Sad part is that I’ve seen the top 10 so many times, shows how little players ratings has
No, it just means certain people spam ratings for the duration of the season.
Even if they do spam I should only see them once on a while, not 3 times in a row
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the higher damage you do, the higher your rating will be. Correct?
Apparently doing 4k+ every match is only good enough for gold league. 3432...
Damage isn't the only stat it accounts for, sdaly
spotting also
Did anyone here get the new diamond league cammo on Bat Chat. If so can they sent a pic
Thanks mate 👍
Still need to play 50 battles to win the camp?
Its easy ti get to platinum but to diamond after is unlogical
yes
@cinder cargo by logic I missed iron 0 to 999
Well every time after calibration i get to silver and go thro gold no problem but platinum its nightmare as u dont get as much points from wins(often u get about -35 and max ever points i had earned was 30)
Literarly u need to rely on team and u often cant carry the team and u lose points
im 450 away from diamond
@undone python u had good calibration or good teams?
mostly no but u do have do give instructions to ur team,if not they goin be blurr as hell
i calibrate at 3.7k
Việt Nam ... play
I usually get to platinum(4,300) and usually carry my team ;-;
now im at 4740
Still need to play 50 battles to win the camp?
Ok so who can explain the thing about earning extra credits this month in Ratings???
That has always been a thing...
The higher the league the more bounses to xp and credits you get after a battle
But I’ve noticed no difference in earning more credits in Ratings... the news was quite unclear are that
Gold leagues : 0-32%? What does that even mean? Is it random??
It depends on how much you do during the game as far as damage, spotting, tanks destroyed I believe.
I believe after the battle is shows how much you earn extra from these bounses.
I’ve never seen that though, only the extra XP earned. I’ll have to look closer when I get put into a league.
i have a question what is the most points you can earn/lose in a rating game
does anybody know why i cant comment on the balance-discussion?
cuz u got mute maybe
Did u guys realize, one can check his rating in blitzstars even before calibration is finish
Can't we get unique 6k camo and avatar? Also
JUST AN IDEA
Make 8 seasons, every season has 40days... then each season has a set of missions you have to complete.
Rating camo and avatar stays the same each season as its now.
But completing 70% of all missions overall and also staying above 4k rating in each season gives you a unique camo, avatar and a tier 6 tank.
And completing 80% of the missions overall and also staying above 5k rating in each season gives you a unique camo, avatar and a tier 8 tank.
And then completing 100% of all missions overall and also staying above 6k rating in each season gives you a unique camo, avatar and a tier 10 tank.
And not stupid missions like at the moment.
Stuff like blocking damage, spotting tanks, damage ratio in meds, accuracy % and even things like capping a base in a heavy or TD lol just something that forces players to play all tanks and not just the same OP tank over and over
and GOLD
You might as well hold up a sign that welcomes everyone who rigs and give them a hug while you’re at it. The only thing that will catch their attention is the fact it’s a free t10 tank for them since they will just rig their way to the top. Missions specifically for ranked are a thumb up from me but they would have to be thought up of carefully and none of this “td has to cap base” sort of nonsense.
@hard chasm yeah the mission thing needs some thought. That was just me talking nonsense.
All i can think about is lets say spotting, blocked damage, damage ratio per type of tank maybe? Uhm stuff like capping they will always have in, shot accuracy can be a nice one. I dunno but yeah you have to do both, like 100% missions complete over 8 seasons and 6k each season to get tier 10 tank reward with camo and avatar.
Like 6k rating is for the best of the best i feel
You already get a different camo and ofc you get the avatar of your rank, the tier 10 reward tank is a bad idea. As for the missions I think it would be better for ranked if they had a separate mission log which only worked in rank and if you complete it then you receive keys which you collect throughout the season and at the end you have chests which take different amount of keys to open with some good rewards( no tier 10 tank). I think that’s a step in the right direction and it’ll improve ratings.
I do feel like the 6k guys needs a league of their own with their avatars and camos being different. But thats easy.
Yeah that keys idea is not too bad, yeah maybe the tier 10 tank is a bad idea. But rewards as in free xp certificates, gold and lower tier prem tanks can work
With time 6k things will come but for now I think that’s not a big deal.
whole rating concept is kind of useless in current meta. Rating is meant to be based on your skill, idea is to separate good players who can use more than two brain cells at a time and let them fight each other. But problem is that every joy average "noob" with 45%+ WR and a lot of spare free time can get to 5k+ rating without any effort. U receive some fancy camo and avatar, u usually see teammates saying "focus player xxx" just because they see fancy diamond league avatar (while there is only deeply average player behind it). Rating battles should be based on long-term battle stats like D/R ration, avg DPM, spot rate etc and players with similar stats should be put together. RN its more about spare free time than anything else
getting to 5k actually takes effort. and no a 45% cant get there if they constantly play, unless they actually play better than what their stats show
5k takes a decent amount of skill to reach
basing players on their career stast however is the worst idea possible
if a 60% and 60% constantly fight each other, they will end up as both 50%ers. and the rating points is what the whole mode is about so no point bring stats into it
if i wouldnt be so lazy i could post dozen of players like this
and yes, i wanna play with other 67% WR players so i haveto try hard to do my best to outplay them. i dont wanna see E-100 player with 5100 rating sit in a bush in the upper left corner of Canal map and call other noobs (another one example for them all)
If it's indeed true that 44% players with some stupid noob-camping tactics can get into diamond league, then the rating system really does suck.
I think rating games (above 4k) are pretty hard, but I am playing normally.
How’s camping stupid noob tactic?
Camping can be a good tactic in some situations
Wow @empty lichen , so its true. I actually wouldnt mind if WG tunned points a bit to make it harder to go up
To get the camo for the leagues, does it need to be 50 battles in one tank or 50 battles over all of the tiers? I don’t play ratings much so I’ve never gotten the camo before
@desert kettle dude. Just read the WG news on it. Just bloody read.
@desert kettle 50 battles per tier so if you want them for T7-10 you have to do 50 battles in each tier
Alright thanks man, funesino that was rude
I know. Asking others to explain how things work cos one is lazy to do his own reading is quite rude
Just asked a question did not need the salt
@empty lichen that is naming and shaming, you should delete before a mod sees it and muted you or smth
I guess
@hard chasm Smart, smart
Hey devs, what happens if you get to platinum and fulfill the requirements for the cammo, but what if your favorite vehicle period in the eyes of rating is a tank which a cammo cannot be applied, ie snowstorm, gravedigger, my guess is that it goes to the next favorite vehicle?
I think you just get credit compensation @spice wasp
are you serious
I think, I'm not sure if they changed it
It should be on your next most played tank @spice wasp
As long as you have played enough games in the other tank
1st time making it into platinum 🙂
Congrats.
Thanks! I'm looking forward to diamond, but not until I get a tank like the IS-4
Aaannnddd… I'm going to end the night here
^
If I only have Tier 7-8 tanks, which tanks are best for ratings?
(I'm td player)
tanks you do well in
@tall radish submit a ticket. Don't call them out here.
@soft yacht jp, skorpion , su
I don't have Jagdpanther or Skorpion G, and SU 152 in ratings is too weak imo
ofc itz a tier 7 and everybody is spamming premium 8
@empty lichen what you are asking is impossible. Clearly 2 or more people play this account. The better player is not interested in grinding so he plays only ranked.
im still not seeing where it tells you how much extra credits you earned for the battle 🤷♂️
This rating season is way way way worse that any before
Asia server is dead in ratings
waiting for 50+ minutes and still cant get into a match.smh
EU - camping and flanking heavies, rushing foch 155s, kamikaze Bat Chats, people who fire HE non stop and most important of all - people drowning/parking against a will and shooting it with HE
im stuck at 4k9 cuz i cant get any matches
I guess it's because of the camo that lots of people don't like
tbh the rating ace camo is nicer than the top notch camo
You are exactly pointing at an issue of the rating reward : one thing (camo) at the end.
There is no incentive to play throughout the season and to carry on when you have reached the required level (threshold effect).
for me thats a potential of 750 gold + 600 gold + 540 gold + 405 gold so i cant complain
its posible to get 155 points in gairing battels ??? WTF! HOW ?? CAN EXPLIN ME WG???
@soneX___#0448 last battle of calibration
hm..... but i never see that many points ....
Maybe if gold went not just to top 10 but top 100
Yeah it’s a little silly the relatively low amount of gold that gets handed out. Like imagine reaching top ten and you get like 500 gold?
Yes, I agree, theres no rewards for playing ratings, it should have significantly higher credit gain (like +50% at diamond, 40% at platinum and 25% at gold) to just get more people an incentive to play.
The additional exp can stay.
Also gold rewards of 500 for top 100, 1000 for top 10, 3000 for 3rd place, 4000 for 2nd place and 5000 for 1st place
Now this is probably way too much to ask but WG please make it happen
5000 for 1st place*
What are the current rates per bracket anyways? Too lazy to search it up. All i remember is that it’s low and not really worth the headache of dealing with ranked teams
Ranked teams are arguably better than regular most of the time
Unless you're playing at tier 8. Then they're just trash. But 9 and 10 teams are good
Whats the camo we get for the ranks
You already get up 66% more credits at 5k+
forced lose by ping ?
Or it’s just your end
ratings battles need a rework
I mean, I calibrated at 2.8k and am at 4.5k atm (granted, im playing mostly t8, but nothing op)
Exactly you can climb up, just spam battles
well, it also takes skill, a player who is sub 50 won't have much influence on the battle and won't win as often/wont get as much points, so spamming battles won't exactly increase ur rating, they may for a bit but they can't get far
Lol 125 ping, 40fps (ok, 13%pl). This is standard for many.
but true my game is lagging on 59FPS
Every time the rating gets reset I have to cross the noob sea again. I’m tired of dealing with such players again and again. It just takes the fun out of this game mode.
Well it's simple, deal with it.
Calibrate at 4500 as ez as that
Only 4200 im afraid
Then why have a mode if it’s not played nor enjoyable? I’m getting tired of this game as it’s not fun anymore.
I think it is fun ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Je
@short snow lol, i agree, leopard 1 is so fun
Aslo, 140 is trash compared to the 62a but looks so sleek especially with graphite cammo
Lol the 140 is not trash compared to 62a
No, you're right. The 140 isn't trash, it's just been Thanos'd - That is, snapped out of existence!
Bro, the T-62A now does LITERALLY everything the 140 does, but better. It has a degree more gun depression, it's turret is stronger, it's gun is a light year ahead...
The 140 isn't a tank anymore
When it gets 8 degrees of gun depression then it will render the 140 useless. Currently, I wouldn’t rule it out.
Oh, currently no
By the way they changed it to 7 degrees, because apparently 8 was too much
Ohhh I didn’t know about the change to 7. Seven will be nice though! 👌🏻
@tawdry ingot u do realize that update 6.6 hasn't hit yet...
I am aware. I follow the open testing
im just messin wit ya
Rating is just as “random”. Teams are supposed to be balanced but they are not. Lots of streaks and 7-0 battles. What’s the point then? It’s just a mode for afk farming credits in premium tanks...
And then you get the matches that are literally 3800 average versus 2900 average rating 🤷
Foches r such a pain in ratings
Foch is good against not so coordinated team and there are lots of them
on 4000 avg of team still contains not so experienced players
Rating? No. Go seelclubbing with the collector t2s. They love it
Rating is just a nice mode for me to grind xp and get a cool camo 🙂
Ratings should offer games at a players level with the push of a button. Then people could have an alternative to random and stop meeting lower ranked players altogether. It’s just that the reset happens way to often to make that feasible. With all ups and downs it’s more games spend among noob teams than having nice balance matches.
What? What is your logic here? Swap to a different tank and shoot prem rounds? They are in the game for a reason, it is not pay to win to use them
All that I see here is that you are good in the e50 and bad in the Leo and 140
Im pretty sure that there was no logic there. It's just sarcasm and jokes.
lel
Bruhh the TOP 2 guy can go into so many battles and I cant.Im just like 60 points more then him
trigerrin me
@short snow ty
@undone python oh no wonder haven't been seeing you increase much F
ya F
why it always lag at this time. everyday ???
@bleak cliff Finally someone who actually understand what prem ammo is
He is a pro :/
Am I the only one who crash some games in rating ?
New month, same closing time. Does wargaming ever listen to what the players want? Close an hour later!
art
I don’t have any chance that I gotta is the day we can come to pick you guys up tomorrow night or tomorrow or so I’ll just take it off and I will be there in a couple hours and I gotta get it done and I wanna was a way to pick it up I was just going through the stuff that I gotta is a good night I wanna I was just going to come over and pick it up I just wanna is a good day to come get it to me I gotta get you to know what what time would you like us to pick it up I will pick ya kids up at the same time I don’t know 🤷♂️ is the way I wanna I was just gonna was the night I wanna I was just like I gotta is a nice 👍 was the night I wanna I was just like I gotta is a nice 👍 was that I was going to come over and get my car back in the time of my way you come get to me you come get to pick ya guys up and I’ll pick you guys up at five or tomorrow so I’ll be back in the house and pick you up I’ll be there at one ☝️ is a way to pick me up and then I gotta is the time for you guys and you guys come over tomorrow I wanna is a nice
@lavish bluff I think y'all got the wrong server, lol
I think he just spammed autocorrect since it makes 0 sense
He just typed a word and started pressing the first auto-fill word.
Exactly what I wanted to say and he didn't get muted for it what a lucky boi
@hallow iron congrats ull get the most stupidest warn ever aka memes in memechat
ok time to stop playing
@short snow try to get as much damige ass possiable to reduce the punishment of over 30 points(which is apsurd in platinum)
Uff well u were dead
@cinder cargo 🤣 👌 couldn't be more on point
@hallow iron if u get it ping me
Got it
10/10 rulebreaking @hallow iron
problem with rating battles is that completely new players can play rating with a t10-7 premium, have more qualifications, such as minimum amount of battles, or 1 tech tree t10 tank, or something, my rating is horrible because of trolls on my team who could not care less about ratings because it wipes a clean slate at the end of the season, ratings should be for people who want to play more competitively without taking a hit on their win rate
Honestly, have benchmark achievements, gained 1000 rating points, 500 gold, first t10, 500 gold, or credits as a bonus, but more so in rating battles for obvious reasons, to me, the avatar and cammos are enough, but many people disagree and eventually, maybe my opinion changes, it does not help that you cannot extend ratings more deep into the night, after school ends 3:30 pm, I go to sleep, only giving me 15/20 minutes until it hits 11 and my time is up, extend the time or something, idk
This is a problem because of the frequent resets. I mean if there were 3-4 a year it would work but this is way too often. I usually get into the platinum league and it takes me 2 weeks. So I have 2 weeks to play decent games. It’s not worth it. 2 weeks of weak games followed by 2 of higher quality ones. Not a very good trade.
well it took me exactly 2 days to get into plat and i wasnt even tryharding nearly got ranked to plat but unfortunately due to a wifi failure i screwed one match and ended up at 3940 on my 2nd acc
It depends on the players available and hours you play. The problem is I get the same players and matchmaking as in “not so random”. 6 players under 5k battles vs 2 under 5k. And that’s being generous because some had just a few hundred battles. How is that supposed to work?
I'm only the loser in rating battles with around 2500. Why only me??😩 😩
Trolls in only my matchmaking. Plz nerf. The players do not care about ratings and just decrease our ratings
Please. The players should have their personal ratings, on the basis of their personal score in a match....
I think in rating only winning should count. Players that don’t do anything and stay afk should not get any credits at all. If the team wins only then there should be rewards.
Players have their personal rating that is very little dependant of their teams
They were both afk, how come the difference in points?
the dude from L1VE probably had a discconect and due to his high rating he lost less because his rating was probably much higer then the avg rating of your battle
Ok thanks, avg was 3791 so ur probably right
Glad he was afk btw 😏
Some stay afk to get easier battles for mastery medals. Others just for credits.
@restive dawn i get you so much in ratings, and get my ass smacked by you, mind if i DM you?
I get spammed already doesnt hurt me too much if you do so too
@zenith trellis it is because the higher up you go in rating, the less points you get from a win and the less points you lose on a defeat. the L1VE guy has a higher rating therefore he lost fewer points
Done
took ya long enough
wow
wow how you got 5k? i cant even get 4k
@fossil moth Just play it, it's a lottery. Reaching 5k is not difficult, it is only time consuming.
Exactly and it’s stupid to have to qualify over and over again to reach it. It’s like Groundhog Day.
Yey for once
I dont know.. I tried my best but..This game not working...I think I go hang myself on a tree...
Bruh
I feel so bad
this is #rating-battles ,not #my-ratings-mm-is-so-bad
sorry @brisk frigate
I want diamond i have 4750 points
@covert geyser get it this week as after friday everyone, and I mean everyone will be off until the end of the month because of all the holidays. This is your only gap if you want to push 5k.
That’s mm telling u it’s time to stop
hmm
Lol
Help!
The channel name hasn't been changed to #i-cant-do-well-in-ratings my end, must be something wrong because that's what all the messages seem to be about 🤦♀️
Tbh this channel should be closed down. Nothing productive is done here
Only complaining cuz people cant win
u need to play in toilet to be invincible
@quaint thunder t28 in ratings ? kidding right. how to win
@short snow I got some tier 10s, but no E 50 M. Best I can do is T22
use Batchat
"T22"
@pine falcon i often meet you in ratings. I am Jana_voda75 :D
@covert geyser all I know is you won't be meeting me until the January as I am done for the month. =) But will keep you in mind so I can say "Hello" next time
I try get 5000 and I stop playing ratings :D
well thats what everyone does xD
WTF?
Some players are calibrating, that’s why the difference in team rating.
Why are the waiting times this long
Look at the 7 players in the queue at tier 8 🤦♀️
If you want quicker games then play tier 10 where everyone else is
It’s not worth playing ranked unless you grind the next tier tank and random takes a toll on your win rate. Otherwise there’s no reason. Teams are just as bad while 0-7 losses are all too common because of the mixed PC and touch queue.
Ah yes, rating isn't supposed to be competitive it is supposed to be for grinding. Hmm interesting logic
I feel like rating battle are dead, there is only a few players playing in a compétitive way, teams are not really better than random battle and there is only a few players playing rating....
@quaint thunder. i don’t mean u should use tier x.
when you lose on one tank 3 in a row. then change tank. it is simple. because at that time. other play play too many tank that overpowered your current tank
for example. when people all play mt. if you use td. you will very hard to win
when people all ( more than 4 same kind in both team) HT. then TD is good choice...
@short snow the problem I got rn is that I can play T28 Deffender and heavies, but appart from T22 I suck at pretty much any medium and TD
What is ranking supposed to be? Players complained about the low skill level of play so ranking should fix that. But does it really do that? Players still have to qualify after each reset. Every time they have to cross a sea of noobs. By the time that’s mostly over with the reset looms on the horizon. Then again not helpful players are never entirely out of the picture as they still flood battles at times. That’s why I mean there’s little point to it.
Other than extra bonus credits and xp, and a camo, yeah, little benefit.
waduhek how
one of them one the other lost is my guess
And apparently I have to say it again, this channel is not to complain about random games you didn't win, go post them on your own server because no-one cares
Wow you had a good battle. Yeah no one cares.
@agile sphinx what he writes interests me but what you write I don't care. he wrote about rating battles and this is the place to do it
but its not the place to cry about rating MM
and thats been said by mods quite a few time i think
@ornate spoke His message is absolutely useless, why should anyone else care that he lost a half decent game in ratings? If he wants to put it somewhere then it belongs in #screenshots
@fallen mortar yes, but if he got 50 points for his battle, that would solve the problem
sure just dont make anyone loose points anymore problem solved for eveyone and rating is then just another random mode
everyone has loose and win streaks and if you are high enough your players start to get better but thats beyond the 5k i think
man, he wants to show that the points system works badly, and this is the place for such opinions.
he got 25 points thats more then enough
damage 5k and only 25 points, this should be changed
of course, just write that it's a noob, don't be ridiculous
if you play well you get a lot of points, no matter if you won and the problem of complaining about match making disappears
That moment you complain about not getting 25 more points when the system literally makes it impossible to lose points if you have half a brain 🤦♀️
V1lzu7#5493 was muted
jeezus why does the MM take so long
legit its taking 10+ mins to get into a match
with like 20 players in the same tier
Bc so little players are playing ratings
Depends more on the time when you want to play rating battles
fantastic
I have no idea how many times this has been repeated, but #rating-battles is not #why-is-my-ratings-mm-so-bad
Well that’s the problem with rating battles, they’re basically glorified randoms
Pyrrus360#0729 was banned
The problem with ratings is people go in there with the mindset : imma play with good players that carry me
Yea
Maybe we should stop giving the option to play rating to those people that have no idea how to play and buy a tier 10 premium. I’m sick of new players coming into tier 10 matches just cause they can buy a tier 10 and play rating without having to get 100% crew or do anything doesn’t mean they know how to play. If your gonna allow people with 100 battles and a premium tier 10 they bought then you might as well just shut rating down. Fix your issues and fix this once great game instead of trying to make a quick buck off everyone.
many many times has it been suggested that some stat limits need to be put on rating but never like NEVER have we agreed on what those limits should be
WR isn't down to luck 🤦♀️
It kinda has to do with luck
What I propose is that they don’t allow tier 9/10 collector and premium tanks. They already set a system that makes people have to get to 100% crew and mount top modules(although you can gold your way through that all) they just need to limit the amount of new players getting through that by buying the premiums. I don’t think it’s all about win rate; but they could implement a restriction for military honor(restrict people with anything under 3 stars for things like inactivity in battle, and un supporting conduct).
Just have a battle restriction, like 3k battles or something. WR and other stat limitations aren’t really fair, and if u prevent the sub 50%ers from playing you lose like half the player base. Also, calibration should start around last seasons rating, with a cap of 5k or something, really not cool when everyone starts at 3k and ur rating is determined by how lucky you got in those 10 battles.
players who have an account and premium tanks have preferential mm. ok that's not a problem. but please make match making not add them to the team where they are noobs and get a positive score for 1 shot in a battle. noob in a rating battle, 1 shot in a battle - 50 points, even if his team won the battle.
this guy with a 68 percent winrate had a 800 av dmg, he 1v1 ed me 10, and WRECKED ME, I check his stats, his 3 most played tanks were the m2 light, the ha go, and the t2 japanese tank, with 6k min battles in each,
well played...
his rating was 5000+
Someone might be playing for him, or he’s just some meme reroll, if you have 800 avg dmg ur just bad
It’s probably an old time seal clubber acc
Either that or if you are like me you just played a lot of tier 5 rounds.
Check his DW2 battles lol that’s how you tell
Keni otsu for da real seal clubbers pff 😂 and well I'd say there is a problem with the 3k battles solution 1. People with 3k battles still suck ery often 2. I know people below those 3k that only play ratings to keep their 100% Wr but still play decent
This is not the screenshot channel why can't people start reading
Low win rate players should be getting into the bronze or silver leagues after some battles so platinum players shouldn’t meet them at all. The problem is with recalibration occurring way too often so these kind of players are encountered again and again.
seasons need to be 2 months. but that as well loses a lot of interest mid and end season
Calibration should start around the previous season’s rating, with a cap so you can’t get too high. The main problem is that 95% of the players are 2.8k to 4k, so you get those high rating or low rating matches very rarely.
can you fix noobs?
No
Can you fix event? is broken
Can you start sending things in the correct chat?
@pine falcon isn't this the complain about MM chat?
@fallen mortar might as well be called that
Or please give me more points chat cuz I'm not able to get gud without
Players aren't complaining about matchmaking but because they meet low performing team mates again and again. Ranting battles should put everyone in battles with other players of the same calibre. Unfortunately this is not happening often enough. In addition there's still the problem of some being afk from the start while inactivity votes run out pretty fast.
@bleak crest hahaha what a joke, clearly you haven't witnessed this chat. Also complaining about low performing team mates IS complaining about mm.
People would also complain if they meet super unicums all the time because they have no chance against them
Complaining about matchmaking means there's some bug in there that creates anomalies but I didn't see that in ranked compared to random. Losing streaks are shorter in ranked, especially when the rating gets higher. The main problem is that no so many players are in the rating queue. This leads to a spread in leagues which leads to mixed leagues teams. This could be addressed by making the mode more appealing to players. The other issue is afk players which is impact rating battles more intense than a random battles. Probably here military honor should work differently. Maybe more inactivity votes or fewer votes needed for a ban. Something of this sort. If these measures are implemented, matchmaking won't have to be changed at all. So the key to the problem is more around the matchmaker rather than inside it.
@fallen mortar players should only meet other players from the same league. Only if they progress they will meet better players. So ideally silver should never meet platinum for example. Also I'm not a fan of the reset. It would be nice to have instant battles at my level anytime.
So all you care about is winning as you said you loose less but that would mean that the enemy team might have worse players
I don't like losing streaks and low quality game play. I think I actually win less in ranked than in random but I enjoy it more and I believe it should be the future pro game mode in blitz. What I generally dislike is to have a bad gaming session with losses in a row, totally useless players in supremacy mode, the kind that manage to lose a win battles, afks, those sorts of things. I think it doesn't take much to make rating battles a lot better and allow the matchmaker to reach it's full potential. The kind of problems I mentioned can't be fixed with matchmaking.
Isn’t the point of rating to play with players around the same level as you? Clearly this isn’t what is taking place. If you think people complaining about not being put with players the same level as themselves is not what this chat is meant for then please explain to me what it is for. Is it for talking about how great the system is set up? No this chat is meant for constructive criticism and if you think that silencing complaints about how the system is set up then your wrong.
Rating is when you are supposed to play with balanced teams based on their ratings, which the system does within constraints of the size of the playerbase. Complaining about bad players or when you don't get "enough" points when you lose isn't helpful at all.
sending screenshots of things everyone has seen at least 100 times isnt helpful either
hi
what are the rewards this time around?
@primal bluff not the right chat
Imo WG missed a huge opportunity to get people playing the ratings mode. They could have offered 3 clementines for every win I guess. Over time yes people will abandon the mode again. But at least there will be a bigger pool of regulars in the season compared to before.
Also on another point, why did they stop giving extra credits that correspond with your league like before? Only getting more experience isn't as appealing as getting more experience and credits.
@keen ingot Tier 8 rating is popping - easier to find a game there than on regular
@keen ingot people would abuse that again and farm themselves down to 1,3k rating just for the easier battles
Yes
😁
Congrats
That was calibration 😄 10 battles => 10x victory
Damn
I seriously hate mmr of this game I got bad teammates every game so I got into silver....
Usually i am in gold
That's another problem people dislike. From one day to the next you can change leagues. If they reset it that often why not keep players in the league they qualified for until the reset. Then they can be demoted, promoted or kept at the same level. Maybe people would play more. Otherwise they will reach a convenient level and stop until the reset for fear of losing that position.
Now I’m #3 on the NA server
Ive literally just stopped at 4K, you can’t go up anymore cuz there are just so many noobs, every match is a hard carry and sometimes that’s not even enough. Stay away from ratings for now, all you do is lose
Yes but if there were actual leagues then stopping would not be necessary.
You mean if there weren’t any retards playing this mode I would have motivation to keep on going
I spent 20 battles today going up 100 rating, that’s literally a 15% wr
Fix plauers
@open iron is your clan Flash Lighting?
Yes
@warm charmnot true
and whats the thing in this for me useless looking picture
@warm charm it’s 15% above 50% cause you won points.
Cry 🤣
Mimimi 🤣
Scoring systems should be thrown in the trash and replaced with a completely new one
@bleak crest not true, remember that you gain more than you lose, and sometimes you gain on a loss. Usually I gain 30-40 on a win, but lose 10-20 on a loss
Unless you have like a 30% WR in ratings (which is almost impossible unless you try) you will gain points just by spamming battles
I do at least 2k dmg at t8 almost every game and I still have 30% wr
this is no accident, only a fool can think that. it works as WG wants. only the best players and in platoons manage to escape from the guillotine 50% wr.
@ornate spoke bruh. I ain't good, I rarely play in platoon (except during holidays) and still have 58%wr
@pine falcon players who have 60% or more are 5% of this game
They gotta do something right then
If you spam battles you will probably get to 5k even if you are quite bad just use the meta tanks at T8 and your 5k will be reached soon
yes and 1000 battles during the event
95% of the playerbase is low iq, and that 95% will always be on your team
@ornate spoke 95% are beginner players (everybody was once) and players who are without talent. such a life.
And out of that 95%, 95% are 8 yr olds begging their parents so they can play wotb on their ipad
Wg, fix ghost shells omg
Fix the broken damage mechanics
I can hear a warning approaching
Rating begins to suck again, I quit rating for now before I lose my camo. Thanks Wargaming.
Dude if you can't keep urself at 4k rating don't complain about WG then it's probably your fault maybe tell me ur IGN and I might rethink my statement
What's this, the stats police? Lmao
@summer shard tbh most of the people who don't reveal their IGN are more or less <50%
It seems ghost shells are back. Never had that many in a day.
🗿
Haha, stats police, that’s a good one @summer shard 👍
ratings is garbage because it gives people points in losses, i dont care if you did 9k dmg and its a loss you should still lose points. Its pretty simple loss = -45 and win +50 points
This way you can't spam battles until you 6k you will eventually hit a certain point where you lose more than you win
Lol - I agree with what ur trying to say but the point gain and deduction shouldn’t be that linear
If u put in a shift u ought to be rewarded for it, especially when the rest of your team are scrubs and did within first minute
Died*
And you gain less points as you are higher so unless your willing to spend ur entire life on ratings, you actually have to be good to gain a significant amount.
kinda funny since there is like 37+ people in diamond rn
3k gold for 1st , really wg ? :)))
How is this posible?
Why are you playing tankenstein in ratings
Their 10th game in the calibration
@rich cobalt is calibrate
First place
😄
@minor meteor congratulations on the first place. If we see your stats 50% wr and over 700 battles is evidence that the scoring rewards active players. so any noob who plays 1000 battles has a chance to win the diamond league ;/ 1-3 places are 700-800 battles, how much is it per day?
Yes it’s normal @ornate spoke don’t ping WG developers if u have a minor question. It matches you with people ur rating, so it takes a long time
Today I waited an entire hour to get me into the match
@normal garnet
this is due to the extremely small prizes, there are not enough games in this game mode, but those from wg are not interested
3k gold :)) good reward
@normal garnet mm does not match players based on ranking. waiting times are sometimes long and players keep getting warm because rating battles are not popular
...
I wish ratings was always available, I have to wait till 8pm to play and I really want to get to platinum for the nice camouflage :p
It become impossible to play rating these days...
no not really
31 dec.
Is it good?
Never be better than 5000 to much noob playing xd
@clever wasp in English
If no other players are available, who should you play with? It’s either those gold league ones or no battle at all. This clearly shows the current format has reached its limit. A new concept is needed.
@ornate spoke I just spam autocorrect, idk what i said.
Over_5000#1236 has been warned.
You got to wait on the NA server longer than on the EU server. WG should merge the NA server with another one.
19 minutes, what a joke!
Having less than 55 wr in ratings and getting to diamond means that u r probably a no-life spammer
@ornate spoke how is that so?
And 55's arent?
gold leaguers get an avatar, plat leaguers get an avatar and camo, diamond leaguers get an avatar and another camo
so silver doesnt get anything ?
XD
Bronze should get an avatar, it’s an achievement for getting that low ranking
Lmao ^
HI. When do we get our rewards for the November 2019 ratings season. I finished in Platinum and did the minimum of 50 battles required at each tier to get the special camo
Why does everyone start off so low?
I mean, look up here, he is a good player but starts at 3300
^ i must agree
I started 4000. Somehow got to 4600 playing 183s etc
wer deutsch hier ?
I can't wait for rating to be over. I want my platinum camo
After that thing I'm ashamed being German I apologize for the poor thing that can't read that this server is english
Is there any way to see how much i spent on game total?
blitzstars shows your total time spent in game
Sorry, i meant 💰
Walla pls german
Btw i dunno how im wrote it to this chanel
If you are playing on Android u see money spent in play store
All that I see is your team got steam rolled and you doing 1 shot of damage before dying. This happens to everyone get over it. You love it when you're on the winning side and hate it on the losing.
Its not about how many i do dmg .... look how many point have lastest player
doing it on purpose
i would pay money to keep idiots out of my rating matchmaking.. i just want to play with people that use their brains.. it's the worst insult for people who actually want to enjoy this game and put so much effort into the game only to be paired up with idiots teammates.. over 4000 points shouldn't be paired with under 4k.. under 4k = bad players
and I don't care if i have to wait 10 minutes or an hour for a match just for over 4ks only
Yes, they have to establish leagues that don’t interact in ratings. That’s the only way. First they need to get the number of players that will make a league feasible when it comes to waiting times. Let’s say 4K . So the top 4K players will be in that league with the bottom 500 being relegated after a season while the top 500 of the lower league will progress. Thus the noobs will be out of the picture for the top players. Problem solved.
who are we kidding? no wg devs or staffs reads these suggestions... they simply don't care.
i think i'm just gonna uninstall this game.. blitz is too unplayable.. i rather just play wot the pc version
@runic copper there’s a difference between reading and acting. Devs read things on this server
Hey, can I find somewhere camos for december 2019 ?
. . .
same as previous event
kk
Can this mode be restricted until a player reaches a certain peak in their 30 day statistics?
hi, this December was my first season playing in rating battles, can anyone tell me approx when will the camouflages and avatar be awarded ? 🙂
right after december, give or take a few days
At 4k raiting and people still go A in canal?
@torpid walrus thank you 🙂 can't wait to have the 4k camo for 2 of my tanks
np
@ornate spokeAfter the last day of the ranking battles u get the avatory of your leage and a camo on the tanks each tier u played the most(50+) depends on your league
I wouldn’t mind waiting longer if I’m in the same range. But having 4K+ and entering in teams with people less than 2k or around is awful
And there are players who enter rating just to develop their tanks as that doesn’t affect their statistics. MM should let more than 500 points difference but .... we all suffer
@robust yoke you do realize you can't play rating battles with stock tanks
Playing with top modules mounted but working on the exp you need for the next level without impacting the win rate
You can't play ratings without 100% crew 🤦♀️
Sorry you’re right 😉
I meant lower tiers that are maxed but you grind for the next one. Apologize for putting it wrong
Can one of y’all show my 62a with 5k ratings camo? Thanks
@knotty dragon
So I will have 5k camo on Patton, even if I want him on stb1. Sad we can’t choose
We can, just play the right tank
@sharp path thank you ! @robust yoke it did not seem to me all that bad if people use rating to do some of the grind, the only way they could remove that possibility without restricting this game mode to T 10 would be to only allow vehicles that have elite experience - that implies that the next tier has been researched, I think - but that seems a bit excessive to me. I mean i did some of the grind with the Panther 1 towards the panther 2 and I gained about 500 rating points in doing so ... but restricting the MM to playing only in your league or within a +/- 500 rating points bracket would make more sense to me
Average damage under 1.5k? Accuracy under 75%? Winrate under 50%? DO NOT PLAY RATING!!!!!!
@ornate spoke Thank you for your opinion. And supporting the idea for + / - 500 rating points margins
Will rating camos be given according to final rating or the highest rating during the season?
Final @frank stump
Do i get the rating camo on one or all vehicles that i have played in ranked?
No
Yes thank you
First place
Love how you get the cammos and avatar immediately when the season ends. Great improvement
Yea
@pine falcon Agree
Anyone that has any rating camo on the stb, please DM me
I got the old 5k rating camo on it but not the new one
camo flex
@iron zodiac
old rating camo on the STB
New rating camo flex
On stb plz lol @stable hound
Best camo is the old 4k tbh
True
But the one you got on leo1 does look good on my jg pz e100
@stable hound nice flex
😅 👍
@stable hound looks nice on the Leo
@tribal lynx Yea? I find it much better on the FV215b
Okey yea it’s give much tanks where it’s looks great on I want it next month on the wz 121
@stable hound
Nice and good luck
Thx you too
what are the rewards for rating?
Camos and an avatar. But if you are top notch then you could compete with the gold reward. And you make more credits and xp as you go from gold to platinum and diamond (you only get camos from platinum and diamond)
U need to get camo only when ur tank is 50battlew
and 4k rating
(Sorry, my english is not the best - hope you understand my intention)
How to get more players into rated battles?
First of all improve the system of points you get after the battle.
I would recomment to see every finished battle as a draw.
Now the 3 players which contributed more for their teams receive more points. The last three players get negativ points. The middle one gets 0 points.
For me the problem in rated battles is, that it doesnt matter which league you are playing, you get the players with around 2000 points in team. Thats because way too less players play rated battles.
Second I would give the players back the chance to grind their tanks in rated battles (Doesnt touch me - I am through the whole techtree).
Your thoughts on that?
no because its working...and you should know that players with week stats have better rng 🙂 (said that one of the supporter )
you say it's unfair ... take into account that this whole game is unfair because it is based on the set rng ... and the errors in this game are still the same for 5 years (Maybe mute me because i said truth haha)
@warped ferry I am with you and your view on that. Same impression here (sometimes)
I am just trying to find a few good reasons to bring MORE players to rb
They dont fix it because they care only about money they dont care about balancing or deleting bugs
Maybe a question about priorities 😉 But I share your frustration
I just dont like to get only 2 or 6 points after a battle in what a 40% N... had the battle of his life
Dont write too much cuz they will mute you when you say too much uncomfortable informations
XD got it
@warped ferry that's not true. You get muted for being rude or cursing.
hmmm why i got rude think....maybe because this game is still in disarray after 5 yeras...
But for the record your whole rigged matchmaking / RNG theory is absolutely false.
Maybe EVERYTHING will be better if WG adjusts some things in rb. I cant stop hoping
What are you talking about xD one of the WG support wrote that to me (in different words but the same)
@warped ferry yeah I'd love to see that.
Proof please.
I've had long discussions with WG about MM and they never said anything of the sort.
it is in polish but give me a sec...not mine ss but from my clanmate
XCCMT01 | Thomas [FUZ]#6302 has been warned.
haha
Told you xDDDDDD
Don't curse here.
I'd like to think you could make a point without cursing ¯_(ツ)_/¯
@wary beacon try again
XD
Everybody knows that but its starting to irritate to have same bugs for 5 yeras 🤔
If kids are on the keyboard XD IMPROVE something in rb. Its "not good" like it is actually
only GOOD PLAYERS with 40wr and boosted accounts enjoy this game xD
"everybody knows"... So now you are speaking for everyone
Whats happening ladies and gents
I am still enjoying it (most of the times). I just want to give some input how it could be improved to have more fun
If they were good players they wouldn't have 40% win rates.
you're overinterpreting now...
And your making stuff up
Youre*
My intention was NOT to open a flamewar. Just wanted to have your thoughts about "how to bring more players in rb" 😉
ok so now explain to me...Player with around 60wr have worse rolls (damage/penetration) than 40wr why or how ?
and I do not speak as a group only among personalities
Sorry, so now your argument is rng based for players with different winrates? Am I reading this right @warped ferry
For sure, WG wants to motivate low-WR-players to stay in the game. RNG is part of it. But that doesnt answer my question "how to get more players in rb" 😉
RNG affects us all equally
Who else is just watching this unfold 🤦♂️
For me yes...Player who dont know how to click left mouse button will hit you for (example is7) 527 or more than avg and you will hit him with lower rolls
Theoretically players with higher WR will have slightly higher average damage as players with more battles will generally be better and will also have higher level crew skills including the max roll skill...
@agile sphinx i know that and i dont mean perk with max roll...i mean that "bots" have better rolls than better players
Possible to come back to the point "how to get more players in rb"?
Make better rewards.
fix matchmaking lol
It you genuinely think that WG is desperate enough to make better players RNG worse to encourage noobs to keep playing you are a lost cause. Go get some data from your own battles and prove yourself arong
They have a patent for a vibrator as well. Just because there is a patent doesn't mean the item is in use. @wary beacon
YOU know it 😉 Got it 😉
@agile sphinx
in general I would not be surprised
This isn't a matchmaking complaint channel. Move on
I am NOT complaining about MM 😉 Read my messages 😉
i am just asking "how to get more players in rb" 😉
Problem uptieru niestety zależy od wszechobecnego RNG, jeśli w danym momencie w lobby graczy oczekujących na bitew znajduje się więcej wysoko poziomowych czołgów nie będzie zaskoczeniem jeśli będziesz trafiał na dół listy. 😦
(translating) The uptier problem, unfortunately, depends on the ubiquitous RNG, if there are more high-tier tanks in the players awaiting battles at the moment, it won't be a surprise if you hit the bottom of the list. 😦
And meanwhile I am asking google for the translation of "Blockwart"
Witaj Dowódco Krecik1804
Dziękuję za ponowny kontakt z działem wsparcia gracza Wargaming!
To prawda, osoby o zdecydowanie gorszych wynikach niż średnia serwera są w pewien sposób łaskawiej traktowani przez system losowania do bitwy. Gracz Ci jednak muszą osiągać niemal zerowe wyniki przez dłuższy okres czasu by trafili od swojej własnej oddzielnej kolejki.
W momencie gdy Ty sam osiągasz po 4 tysiące obrażeń co bitwę raczej tam nie trafisz. Co do reszty Twojej drużyny to ich słabsze osiągi mogą być tylko chwilowe, Ty sam z pewnością nie zawsze kończysz grę z wysokimi wynikami.
Jeśli masz więcej pytań nie wahaj się z nami skontaktować.
Powodzenia na polu bitwy!
Pozdrawiam,
(translating)
Hello Commander Krecik1804
Thank you for contacting Wargaming Player Support again!
True, people with significantly worse results than the server average are in some way treated more kindly by the battle draw system. These players, however, must achieve almost zero results for a long period of time to hit from their own separate queue.
The moment you yourself get 4,000 damage per battle, you probably won't get there. As for the rest of your team, their weaker performance can be only momentary, you certainly do not always end the game with high scores.
If you have more questions, don't hesitate to contact us.
Good luck on the battlefield!
Regards,
👍
so if the uptier problem depends on RNG and next he said that the worst stat players are treated more kindly by the MM = treated more kindly by the RNG
idk what is going on
@runic pollen The very very worst players are put in their own queue to stop them ruining everyone else's games exactly how WG announced. It is nothing at all to do with RNG 🤦♀️
yes THE VERY VERY poor players are put there when they get 0 in a series of battles
@agile sphinx ok so tell me how i have 37wr players in my team..its quite impossible to get into own queue
Because they aren't bad enough, it is only for people who consistently do absolutely awfully over a series of battles, it has been explained before
they have to be handicaped to do such series of battles LOL
and they wont so they are still in the better MM
they arent bad enough lol so i need to have 29wr to get into different queue ? ok xD
It's almost as if that was exactly what WG said when they announced it, it won't remove bad players it will just pick out the absolute worst of the worst 🤦♀️
Funny how the tin foil hat club don't seem to be able to read very well
And whats about your thoughts of "how to get more players in rb"?
Now that we have put a bow on this one let's move on.
I already said. Make the rewards better. But realize that with better rewards comes players you may not want in ratings.... @wary beacon
As longs as you dont match players with around 2000 with players which have 3000+ 😉
@ornate spoke my mate gave you an answer about rng for noobs upper
I saw. That isn't RNG. That is the revised mm system on EU and RU servers.
Thats the main issue. Not enough players online. So the MM has to match them anywhere. If there where MORE players on rb, it would be well balanced
@warped ferry this is a Q&A I did with RibbleStripe.
http://forum.wotblitz.com/index.php?/topic/86788-official-matchmaking-discussion-thread/#topmost
Official Matchmaking Discussion Thread - posted in General Discussion: Want to talk about match making? Then youre in the right place. This thread is for all things match making. Like it? Dont like it? Discuss why here. Please be sure to keep your discussions respec...
There is your answer.
If you don't believe me look who last edited the opening post.
Have to log off now. Have a good night all together. Maybe there is some input to my thoughts about "how to get more players in rb" tomorrow 😉 😉
If wg would put better rewards (like a small amount of gold, credits, free xp or something else) believe me rb would become way more toxic ect.
this is supposed to show my battles today. HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO WIN BATTLES WHEN I DO 3/4K AND MY TEAM DOES LESS THAN 1000 DMG
Carry harder
Do more effective damage.
Thats where all starts. And now the 40%-player in red team has the battle of his life. What do YOU get after a ranked battle if the red team wins? Way to less IMHO
wow Posted 18 October 2017 - 12:21 PM latest news...
In my opinion wg should improve the point system so that if you do like 4-5k dmg you should get more points than 1-5
I'm dead serious. Farming damage without taking red guns out of the game gets you nowhere fast. If you want to win you need to kill the red tanks faster than they kill yours. It isn't about farming damage. It's about using your teams HP more efficiently than the red team uses theirs.
The most i ever got from a loss was 11 points and i did around 5-6k in tier 9
@ornate spoke serious?
@warped ferry updated Feb2018. Like it or not that is WG telling you how the MM works.
@ornate spoke thx for the advice. Blitzstars tells the truth 😉
Yes well kills should be rewarded some how in a way that it doesnt encourage just kill stealing
lol 33wr on Ho-Ri maybe do more effective damage :reverse_card:
Are you trying to stat shame me?
Nope
But is YOUR ADVICE is meant serious for the reward system of ranked battles like it is actually?
nope
I just wanted to show that text is working both ways
And you picked a tank I can't discuss to call me out on. Good move
Is it a good tank?
I can't discuss it
but this is not the subject of this discussion
@ornate spoke me dont either
No it's not. And neither is matchmaking. Time to drop it
I have second question...Rating battle i have 5k points (mm+-1000points) yes ?
so how i can get players with 2000points in my team...
I always stop at 4000. I am too old to go further. not good for my bloodpressure
just want to have the cammo on several tanks
Last season i started grinding rb to get dem camo but i started way too late as rb ended 3-4 days after got only to about 4.4k
imo everybody can get 5k lol just play... points on rankeds doesnt showing your skill
Maybe I take some pills and try to go further. Tired to see players with around 2000 in my team. Lost with 1st or 2nd place in my team and get minus rewards
Tbh i havent seen a single bad player in 4k raiting
XD
Unless the average is below 4k then there is a few... Not so experienced players
@ornate spoke do you have a connection to WG instead of beeing a moderator in this chanel? Is there any idea how to improve rb?
Continuing tomorrow. I really have to log off for now. Have a good night
gn
Gn
I've said it twice now. Better rewards
I think WG should experiment and replace standard battles with rating battles for an update of two, just to see how it would work out with a bigger number of players (especially the average rating for the whole playerbase), I think it would be very interesting
Kinda like how they did it with the +2/-2 and +1/-1 MM some years ago.
must necessarily increase the prizes
Better rewards for ratings pls
Isn’t the reward for 1st place like $10 in gold?
I do like my rating camo:
Rating battles definitely needs more players and the good news is they are already in he game. After battles I usually check stats and browse the clan information. Amazingly there are a lot of players with above average stats that don’t play ratings. Rewards could have something to do with it but there must also be some frustration as in my case when low performers lose the battle, especially in supremacy. So instead of removing the worst performers from the bottom why not take the best performing players and give them their own league with better rewards? In this way they will not meet players that are not very helpful and the rest of the player base will get more manageable opponents. Unfortunately I see more and more battles decided not by the best players but by the worst doing the usual stuff like staying in the open, going alone against more tanks, not stopping for cover. So the team is down 2-3 players in under a minute or 2. This can’t be fixed neither by RNG nor matchmaking. Next battle the same happens on the enemy team. The result is largely decided by how long the worst players remain in the battle. When this happens a few times in a row usually people get frustrated and stop playing ratings.
I dont think good players dont play ratings bcuz of having bad players on their team, they have that in random battles anyways, i think its the fact that rating battles has low rewards and those rewards are for those who can play the most games rather than whos the most skilled coz the point system is too lenient to the losing team
Giving points to the top dmg on losing team promotes selfish gameplay so ppl r who r smart know they just have to dmg to keep going higher
Also giving too many points to the bottom players of the winning team is also bad in my opinion
OK, actually we have worked out 2 points
- Better rewards (when? Only at the end?)
- Improved point system
(Have you ever seen how the points are calculated in ranked battles if its a draw? Thats IMHO nearly the way the points should be calculated after a battle) - Anything else?
for nothing we strive to win as much as one month if the prizes are extremely small! A player probably invests 100 euros a month, and they give a prize of 3k gold, what a joke
they simply do not strive to thank the community, I wish they would not be interested in just making money!
For example, the rating season (December 2019) I offered 10k gold to a Romanian player 🇷🇴, who took 1st place in the rating, I organized a kind of competition only for the Romanian players :) I offered this money from my own pocket and I had an incredible satisfaction when I saw what good players I have in my country
wg people have to do something for the community, otherwise many players will lose
Changing the point system is always tricky. If wins are rewarded then good players will complain when having a great battle but losing due to team mates. If individual performance is rewarded then there will be a lot of selfish gameplay. Currently there’s an emphasis on individual performance which makes battle winning actions like distracting the enemy team not worth much.
it is ok to evaluate the points at this moment!
I believe rating points are based on base xp. I do not see how it could be more fair. It balances damage-kills-assistance.
To me the rewards should be distributed across the whole season and not as end point. Of course, there must be something special for the top players. But this concerns 3-10 players.
If we want more players in ratings the interest must be maintain for all at all time.
@next gull ofc
"distracting" the enemy team is meaningless
It’s meaningless in terms of xp awarded for it but it turns the battle around. It makes heavies get out of position, other tanks taking up the chase, TDs turn. It does a lot but no direct damage so it doesn’t count.
@hollow night then why do people play light tanks?
To spot the enemy and flank... @pallid arch
And what does a lone flanking tank do?
Quite a lot actually.
causes a distraction
Nope. Heavies are the ones who are frontline and" distracting" the enemy because they have armor
When I am a heavy and an enemy type 62 is to my rear I tend to have to turn my gun away from the enemy heavies to deal with it.
In my experience very rarely has a flanker been noticed. Take it from a guy who only plays lights and meds. Also if your team gets flanked, it is most likely the enemy will push forward, not addressing the flanker
Not addressing a flanker is an instant loss
And guess what, if you turn towards that type 62, atleast 2 or more enemies will turn towards you because you are now susceptible as you have turned your turret away. And what would you rather do, have one tanks shooting you up the ass or two tanks shooting you
Ah and also this, how do flankers get the most damage (most of the time)? Because they are shooting rears of tanks, which are distracted by heavies or heavily armored TDs (like t95)
Flanker is an instant loss if u somehow fail to do it
Sometimes they do turn and it’s better to shoot 2-3 tanks instead of the same one. Teammates will have a field day but you won’t do that much damage with more tanks watching out for you. These types of situations are not really rewarded unless you also spot.
@bleak crest cuz it can’t be rewarded. What is the algorithm for that? Not possible without humans watching and evaluating every single game
Ratings doesn't really reward extreme skill. Rather it rewards moderate skill and battle spamming. Stop giving points in a loss
@mossy badger exactly, so that’s why victory needs to be rewarded but afk players excluded which isn’t very hard cause distance travelled, ram damage and overall damage are being tracked. They should get 0 points .
AFK players should simply get a -100 deterrent if distance travelled is zero
@bleak crest you do realize its been worse at season 1 right? afkers won 40 points if they won, the same points as the people who carried. Right now they are barely awarded anything at all anyways and is already pretty balanced