#rating-battles
1 messages ¡ Page 34 of 1
@warm nexus most of these people who have stopped playing rating are people who shouldn't be there at all
How's the que times?
@pearl shale on EU queues are about 5-15secs so not that bad. But after all I an still on 4400 so I assume that the people at 5000+ need to wait a bit longer maybe 20 secs
Sounds better than when it was tier 7-10
Yeah definitely. Also I see more players from top clans playing than before when it was 7-10
Vehicle balance seems very good and improved by running 1 tier, especially tier 10
I think that the new rating battle are completely dumb... I don't want tier specific battles... the old way was best...
Ratings really should only be tier. Making diamond at tier VIII isn't the same as doing it at tier X.
Yeah rating battles this month is so dumb. Tier 10 cmon. I have only tier 9 smh.
Spartacus is right. Last season I just spent 200 battles and I reached diamond easily. Now I am actually struggling sometimes to get points.
Or T8 everybody have a T8
People somehow never get that rating is something elite not useless trash everyone can do so T10 is the highest Tier with decent balance and stop complaining if you haven't reached T10 yet then u shouldn't be playing ranked as easy as that. T8 is a great idea its perfectly balanced not full of op premiums that outperform any kind of tech tree tank @ornate spoke hope you get my sarcasm
I think pretty much any good player that can remember themselves before they got to tier 10 will agree that unless you have researched a tier 10 you should not be in ratings. I can remember my first experiences in ratings and after that i realised that i needed a lot more experience. I stopped playing, tried learning as much as i could and tried it again later and it was much better.
i started ranked at T8 and were around 3,4k for my first calibration not too bad i think but it wasnt fun for me so i stopped for quite some time and only started it again when i wanted the camos
I played when i first bought the lowe (i was at tier 7) and stopped quickly
only thing i hate about ratings rn is that its bloody 60days like srsly what should i do in that 60 days if i can only get one camo, climbing the ladder is nothing im up too since you have to have a lot of time for that
Worst thing about ratings is all leagues play in the same battles. Totally stupid that bronze rated players fight in same battles as Diamond rated players. I reckon most of the whining about "bad" players would stop if battles were single league. Let the elite fight the elite and us plebs fight plebs...
Low is the goal
@silent solar that happens bc no one plays ratings. They should give better rewards, not just a camo an a avatar
Let asia never find anyone they can fight with đ
I never fraught anyone with bronze league when i was diamond
I don't have credit to play rating
nd I don't like playing t8 anymore
Then buy/use a different tier prem or stop complaining
I want want play ratting and I am grinding on tier 9 to get 10. It is not easy it is really disappointed I always end up with 40%ers and lost.
i cant update it D:
now that WG has already tested tier 10 & 8 ratings they should test 7 & 9 next month as well
7? Of all of the tiers why is 7 one that you want there?
They said 7&9 because they've already done 8&10. Rating used to be 7-10
Looooooool
Are rating still relevant with the new MM rule (EU and CIS) ?
So i hadn't played rating battles in over a year, I was mid/high plat when I last played. I started playing them again yesterday and got placed mid/high silver lol. It seems like it takes ages to grind up now (especially when you get placed in games with such vast point differences from where you currently are, with seemingly little point bonuses if you win against higher rated players). Do people play rating battles anymore or has this mode virtually lost all its popularity?
The current system makes you earn your points, it' not the win that matters most anymore
Low is the goal
For this ratings season
..
rating games and ranking r good evidence to prove u r not a noobđ
Not really, anyone can spam games to get to 5k
Rating - a hot topic for MM. How should this even be possible? I need an explanation now.
Can be found from pinned messages
Need somebody there to balance out your rating...
Wow -190 ? This is an achievement in itself.
Last battle of calibration @next gull
Don't shame other players here
Is being normal causing shame?
New rating system sucks, give the old one back.
Tbh rating is innacurate and kinda sucks, as Iâve seen horrible players almost to platinum and good players almost to gold, the only reason any good players still play it is for the reward at the end
My goal earlier was to get the lowest rating I could without actually being afk or suiciding, so I played the Maus as a sniper and the grille as a front line âheavyâ
sounds like griefing but not griefing
Still got calibrated to like 3500 or so lmao
well maybe since u actually still make good decisions, like picking trades etc
Perhaps
I mean, I reverse side scraped a Maus and blocked like 4K, the trades were OP until I was the only one alive lol
@dire quiver Why did you reverse sidescrape a maus?
It does not make any sense to reverse sidescrape a maus đ§
Basically rating work as Leagues. The more you play, the higher you get, irrespective of your skill. The only impact skill have is the pace.
I have 4300 .... why have I a guy with 2300 in my team !?
Because why not
Because the game is not able to put players of the same level together. It is a problem they never have been able to solve.
Now I have 4700 and I had a battle with 3400 average .....
What will be the next tier after tier 10 ranked ??
Ideally 10
They should make a vote again ( I might vote t10 )
I canât have a good team just one time ... thx mm
@lean hill pinned messages
Why do I have a team with 45% players , and in front there are 60% ( not complaining just asking )
Because mm is based on rating which isnât necessarily based on skill
????? Itâs not at all logic XD
It is actually
But I can have a team with all 4K rank with 45% VS a team with 4 k rank with 60%
So logic ur right @restive dawn
You get a team full of 40%ers vs 60%ers because ratings used rng and not wr
Because a higher win rate player canât have a low rating
And a low win rate player canât have a higher win rate
Not to mention that non calibrated players donât change a teamâs average rating
@lean hill
I didnât understand anything sorry
ratings is bad anyway because it allows you to gain if you carry, it just encourages game spamming
What is the WR of super good player on this version of wot btw ?
Still around 60-65% ?
65-70%
100-105%
Very good player arenât looking for % but for wn8 @ornate spoke
I know, but it's pretty linked đ
Just wanted to know if compared to PC, you can carry more or not, at high tier
Its probably easier to carry because you have fewer people to fight against
That's what i'd say, but the WR from unicum isn't that far from PC if it's 65-70%
Its a long way to get from 60 to 70%
Getting to 60% is pretty much all about learning and paying attention, to get over that you need more skill (ignoring sealclubbers etc)
Yeah yeah, i'm only T3 on blitz, just wanted to try a bit, top player on PC are at 60-65% most of the time so the difference isn't that far
Top players here have up to 80%+ đ
rerolls you mean?
Pros who are so good that with 500 battles they have 2 tier 10s with 85% WR on their only account*
They would have to have tier own game economy as well to get two tier X in just 500 games đ
@restive dawn i only know 2 that have around 80% but im not talking about rerolls
@low kayak T22 and Mk6 are in store now đ¤ˇ
@restive dawn i bet you have heard of HerrMroz
There were a couple of 90% people on 5k battles with tier 8s at some point on EU
@agile sphinx well, I thought about grinding to tier X and keeping that win rate in 500 games, that a good player.
@lean hill I guess you donât
Did I talked to you ? @undone pulsar
You asked an open ended question
I answered
Itâs not my fault you donât understand how ratings are matched up ÂŻ_(ă)_/ÂŻ
âWhy do I have a team with 45% players , and in front there are 60% ( not complaining just asking )â
âWhyâ is a question word
You also literally said youâre asking
This answer is supposed to help me ?
Am bad at English what does I guess U donât means
I already explained it
Is ratings going to change in terms of tiers?
Next season probs gonna be tier 7 or 9
T7 oh god pls dont i can smell smashers dracs hellsing and stuff
Excatly
.... it be better if it was tier 9 ...
Stupid guys.... only real tank will be allowed ... @kind owl
Foch 155 are runing Rampag on rating
I got to 5k the day after the update. Just get quickly to diamond and stop playing. Literally the only way to get away from Foch and Chieftans.
Chieftain is weak compared 2 e5... e5 is weak compared 2 most heavys.
No
@near finch what the heck this belongs to Rating battles???!!!! 1.wrong channel 2.both tanks arenât weak!
Finally am at 5k..... the spam of Foch , chieftan is horrible
Imagine banning collector and premium tanks
This post was made by the warthunder gang
Kirovets , the comment was in reference 2 the comment above mine (Ik this is not balance chat) and I wasnât saying that the tanks were in general âweakâ but rather that they had some weak characteristics,meaning that they are not op . The comment above was making out that the chieftain was as good a buffed Foch . so having loads ig atm are not going 2 affect players to much.
Personally , I was playing is4 or obj140 ...
@undone pulsar imagine a good game â
And rn its more like a Foch and T-22 spam havent seen to many chieftains tbh
its somehow harder to play with good people then with nabs because those "pros" keep blocking because they want more dmg etc and thats really annoying and they keep flaming each other as soon as theyy fail
@@lean hill chieftain is good
I like the change to tier 10. I think the mm and battles are most challenging yet. Of course there are alot of players who cannot even do 1,000 dmg per game, but this is the playerbase we must deal with. I feel this version of ratings battles are the most fun and challenging of all so far. Progress can be slow so its a good challenge to overcome
@ornate spoke yea ... too good , why did u continue to play in ranked after 5k ? U said it was ur last battle
I had a mission
id keep playing after 5k 66% more credits is quite nice
3k gold for #1 ? Is a joke
not worth playing in rating battles, prizes are extremely insignificant, 3k gold? for a month in which you give your best to reach the 1st place? Wg you have to make people play this way, give some more interesting prizes, such as a tank of 7, 8.9, 10 or more gold.
@ornate spoke
I play this game from 2014 but do not try to attract players at all
Add non-stop premium tanks for sale, instead of doing something to attract players
@odd maple
@soft ivy
@fossil scaffold
Pls talk
In order to reach the 1st place in the evaluation you have to be an extremely good player, to invest extraordinarily long + a lot of stress! To reach up to 6000-7000 evaluation you have to play extremely many battles! all things for 3k gold? In this case, it is not very difficult to meet, they play very well for the world, they are not rewarded for a measure, it is worth noting at all while they can change. instead of adding something to the care it deserves to be playing, being foe or the extremely big competitor, captivating the players .. you give 3k gold what is that?
Some players do it for the enjoyment of the challenge, and not for the rewards
I really don't think tagging WG was necessary. You know they won't reply. Also yes, what the post said above me. I got to 5K rating not because of wanting prizes but because rating is my second favorite gamemode after mad games and I like being competitive. Tbh I also did it for the sexy diamond league avatar
Well said
Broken english and just read his speech
You dont need to be extremely good to get number 1
Just be good and spam. Although I agree rewards are bas
Only thing I'd change would be most played tank of a tier gets the 5k camo if reached and the 2nd most played the 4k camo.
@fallen mortar I played last session 10 battles got 4,4 k rating and didnât get the camo -_-
You play 50 battles? @grizzled tinsel
So only get this for 50 battles? -_- yeet. Donât want to play that much
you should be able to read so yeah 50 battles per Tier for a camo
Forgot to turn rating battles on and got immediately punished by the usual bad matchmaking đ
Very long queues. I managed to play only 2 battles today. Waited 45 minutes total for this 2 battles. The game just dont match me despite theres enough players in rating
I waited over 100 minutes 2 seasons agođŚ
XD
And you lost?
The max Iâve waited is like 6 minutes lol
Is the MM brocken or why I get always rating teams with 2600 Points and I am the only one with 3600???? This gameplay there is horrible.
when will calibration end comrades ?
After you play 10 battle in ratting mode
I have only SU122-44 on tier VII. I want back rating battles on tier VII.
6.3 update is Great ! New Italian reverse Auto loader is gonna be grand... Best of Luck to all players. Here are a few suggestion : please make it cheaper to change name. Please reduce the premium account price for one day premium account. Please consider 10 vs 10 game mode if possible.
@warm topaz if you only have a tier 7 then there is no way you should be playing ratings
@warm topaz why u playing rating in a tier 7 tank thatâs no good for you
Hey
gg
gg
gj
@worthy spade I have exactly 5k rating too
Lol
Average ratings team is all 45%ers in fochs and stbs camping at the back, what a great change from normal games đ¤Ś
WG: But why are people not playing ratings? I dont understand...
my last few battles were quite good except for one person screwing the game by capping bases
My games have literally had 2 or 3 people per team over 50%
To be honest this is how rating should be, only tier 10. The problem being with so few players being at Diamond league (screenshot bellow, EU server) is because of a large influx of players, who don't really understand how some game mechanics work or don't have some necessary skills to be called a "good" player. These players quite often influence battles in a negative way by not helping the team. And as Blitz is supposed to be a team game the end of the whole story normally ends in a defeat. And the people I am talking about, are the "idiots" - who just do nothing throughout the entire game and then wonder why their teamloodsing. And therefore I shall say again, "Rating" battle mode was introduced for the competitive and that is why us, the players are not so happy that we meet bad players in a supposed battle type that should be for the more experienced. Therefore I make a hot request, just like many other players, for there to be put restrictions on players that are not particularly known for being good.
@pine falcon I understand your point. But imagine you would only play against players on your skilllevel. I mean if I would play against me i would just camp and no one would do a mistake. I couldnât play hulldown anymore effectively because enemy would allday long pen my turret because of good aim
The best games that you get in blitz is when the teams are evenly matched. I dont care if i win or lose (much), what i mainly care about is getting good games. It is simply not fun when you are forced to carry bad players all the time. Ratings is supposed to be a gamemode where you get good games. Currently the people playing ratings are nowhere near competent enough to be playing. They constantly camp in every tank, and you are often forced to be the only one who spots. This is the complete opposite of fun. Obviously ratings will never be perfect, but changes about who can access ratings will benefit this gamemode a lot.
I think that for rating, there should be a bunch of âsub-leaguesâ. Like for example, 3000 would be âGold 4â, 3250 would be âGold 3â, 3500 would be âGold 2â, 3750-4000 would be âGold 1â. Players can only be matched with players in their sub league (unless the queue exceeds x amount of time).
this would make matches a lot more balanced, but make matchmaking take a lot longer especially at higher leagues.
I think there needs to be more incentive to play ratings battles- there are very few end of season rewards. Maybe throw in some crates, some gold, some credits, some boosters, maybe even a tank if you get to diamond. And I think a lot more players will play ratings
Even if itâs like a tier 7 tank, a lot more âaverageâ players will feel incentivized to at least try to play and grind for the tank.
And I think if there are substantial rewards such as gold or credits, EVERYBODY will want to play. Camoes and avatars are not valuable to most players. But credits and gold and tanks are.
How wud u define a player not good enuf for rating is the question doe, i was barely a 50%er player but i started watching videos on YouTube and i learned a lot
Soon i was a 51%er with unicum wn8 on blitzstars (30 days)
So unless wg introduce 30 day stats i doubt we will get a ban on bad player in rating
MM like that would take ages. It would be better to have MM so you only play with people Âą500 points (for example). This would be similar but would allow more flexibility. I completely agree with more rewards. A different tier 7/6 prem each month would be plenty of incentive for people to get to diamond. Camos and avatars are very underwhelming and having the same one each month doesnt make it any better. The gold is basically unreachable for pretty much every player that doesnt spend all day on blitz.
@molten whale one of the easiest thingsnto do is measure it from tier 10 WR in the last 30 days/50 battles outside of ratings (because your WR will probably go down in ratings)
Exactly but wg hasnt introduced 30 day stats in game and i doubt they'll refer to blitzstars
WG has access to every stat they want. They have the past 50 battle stats (or maybe 100 i cant remember) shown on their own page. If blitzstars can get the stats then that means WG can easily get them by themselves.
I m not saying they dont have access but if a player doesnt kno why he cant play ratings, it'd be kind of confusing for them, so wg wud have to first introduce 30 day stats in game and then if a player is restricted coz his 30 day stats arent good enuf then he can look st them in game
@agile sphinx Ofc. Itâs not a hard number, and I think WG should make adjustments off their data.
Yeah WG definitely need to make some adjustments to ratings and the MM there, but it seems like no DEVS are CHATTING with us in the channel
I dont blame them if they dont check here, look at balance discussion, ppl ask for already good tanks to be buffed and ask for things that cant/shudnt be done
Ratings is still a large part of the game. The devs seem to be showing that they dont care about ratings because of the tiny slowmode and the fact that no dev has ever responded in here (afaik). If they honestly dont care then they should not have have it under the heading "chat with devs". Its a shame if WG do decide to ignore ratings but not too surprising seeing as ratings is morw about the veteran playerbase.
@grizzled tinsel if you camp there are based to cap. As easy as that. Then the camper would have to move. That is called improvising.
@pine falcon not meaning camping like a newb in td. I mean you wouldnât be able to be as aggressive as before when you play against players on your skilllevel. The consequence is that the battles are very static and dominated by caps and the strongest tanks.
Battles against good players are anything but static. You are constantly pushing and flanking to try and gain an advantage because you cant just yolo and kill them.
Ratings won't get better until there are enough players playing so that you can actuallly get league level games. As it stands right now games are filled up with players anywhere from high platinum to low silver with over 2000 point differences in rating (and the plats aren't always better than the silvers...). If you look at any other competive game with different ranks (League of Legends, Overwatch etc) you would never see that big of a rank difference in your games on a regular basis and you can't expect the quality of the games to rise when the games are frequently filled with such a wide rating difference. If there was enough players playing to fill a game with 14 players of the same rank you could expect to see a change in the quality of the games, but not when you have silvers in the same games as plats (this also makes it harder for silvers to climb up to gold if they are having to fight plats to do so). So in my mind ratings won't get better until WG entices more players to play ratings (if they care if they do). Most people in my clan have stopped playing ratings (and these are players with an average winrate of 58%).
you could just make a qualification like the calibration if you dont fullfill 3k ranking in those battles you wont be able to play
Why does Wargaming always put premiums together and let them win?
I like that ratings are tier x only. No one can boost at lower tiers.
Yes
Haven't been able to see the rating leaderboard for a few days for NA. Is anyone else able to see them on NA?
https://wotblitz.com/en/leaderboard/#/leagues/0
The legendary tank shooter. Fight in 7vs7 team battles alone or with friends, research and upgrade armored vehicles, experiment with different tactics and win. Choose a tank and join the battle!
@loud minnow No. And I was about to talk about it too
Is there any dev to explain something about it?
wow good
Rating battles' MM should have a smaller rating span (+/- 500 ?). This is the only way to have the self-called competitive players happy because they fail at understanding that competition is in having battles with players of same level and not only among super-unicae (as if there would be a game mode for 0.5% of the playerbase).
The span is bigger due the boohoo talk about queue times
I liked my relaxing 10min queue times you could relax and get normal after a tilting and frustrating match đ
@dull lynx A dev in a channel under "chat with devs"? You think WG can spare that great expense?
@fallen mortar
@agile sphinx yes but they are giving 0 fks about it
Exactly, who cares about the playerbase that has consistently supported the game?
@restive dawn precisely. How would restricting the access solve that ?
Obviously, it would not.
Restrict access -> quality of games increases -> playerbase realises -> more people play ratings to get away from the average tier 10 player -> queue times go down -> possibly WG realises rating is valid game mode and gives better prizes etc @next gull
It isnt an immediate effect but it will work as long as there are enough people who will wait for ratings games immediately after the first step
No i'll tell u how it goes
Restrict bad player
Unicums will maul avg players
Avg players back out
Queue time : infinite
Half the players that cry about mm here want 7 good players on their team and 7 bad ones on the enemy
And even then they'll complain "i dont get to do dmg"
@agile sphinx I completly agree with the need of better rewards and publicity for this game mode.
Now tell me how reducing the rating span does not accomplish what we want ? It keeps the game competitive for everyone and does not exclude 99% of the player base.
Now if you want real competitive games the Twister cup approaches.
id go to twister but yeah there is something called touch only
@next gull reducing the rating span in games is similar except the queues are garunteed to be long no matter what, and you will also be constantly meeting the same people time after time which gets very tedious.
Both idea work but imo restricting access will work better and will be more future proof.
Let's go play?
Do u want a congratulations or something?
Flex
NA rating leaderboards are still down...
The worst Type of player - toxic guy
There has to be some sort of winrate restriction for ratings
6 losses in a row, all due to the insane number of inexperienced players on my team
No name and shame, that has nothing to do with rating anyway
And check the pinned messages
I am Jesus#2831 has been warned.
Lots of good players. Best rating battle I have had. In terms of players who know how to play
AMX 50 B
'isnt matter'
Lol
If you play a prem t10 in there and mess up, everyone gets pissed lol
lmao
now thats obvious name and shame ^ <@&481447501690568709> since the one i pinged didnt bother
just compare the two screens the 50B is the person hes shaming and naming
How are such people allowed in TIER 10 rating???? Add a min avg damage requirement
Highest non prem is tier 4 for christs sake
#rating-battles yes, please make avd damage requirement for tier9-10
@quartz aspen donât name and shame pls. You can message a moderator in PM if someone is abusive to you in PM (but it must be because of a matter which emerged from this server)
Or. You donât allow premium and collector tanks in ratings. Then this person can ruin them
@undone pulsar But many people will not like that, since many drive Chieftain MK6 to get their ratings.
Why wonât people like that?
Ratings are supposed to be competitive
With good and experienced players
People that grinded lines
Yes they are, and why should you disallow tanks? That seems not very fair.
Not people that have 300 games and 4 tier 10s
Itâs an unfair advantage to buy tanks with a credit card lol
Tech tree tanks are free and available to everyone
Itâs not the point, if experienced players drive a Premium tank for ratings, and from that day to the other Premium tanks get disallowed, how must he feel?
The real question is what kind of ratings experience do you want?
I mean, everyoneâs choicr what tank to drive, if he likes the Premium one, why canât he drive it?
Because your version is just pubs with a longer queue time
My version actually weeds out people who donât deserve to be there
It stops the 400 damage team mates from existing by a lot
Not allowing prems in ratings is an easy way to stop the people who buy their way to tier 10. This works, but ideally there should be other methods to prevent people who shouldnt be in ratings playing ratings. It is not an ideal solution, but there are no ideal solutions
There should be. But there arenât
I also drive ratings with tech tree tanks, also sometimes with T8 Premium, if there is. And why should people not deserve to be there? Thatâs not the way it should be. As a new player, you canât be an OG or an RA1D player. Itâs a game for everyone, most people drive for fun and not for stats, like me.
Could make ratings a minimum of 1k battles
Ok fine. Do you think that premiums are balanced?
Wz 120 1ft
You think thatâs a fair tank?
Sure, why shouldnât it be a fair tank?
Well, a tank can be as OP as it wants to be, the player in it gives results. And a WZ T8 Premium, can be outplayed pretty easily my friend.
Enjoy the one shot of damage team mates
Thatâs just pathetic.
What do you expect from this player?
2-3 shots
As previously stated. Tier 4 is their highest tank
They have no business in ratings
Dude you can send me the worst players of the game, but you donât get the point, that you behave like a toxic kid.
i see a storm incoming
Toxic because i want ratings to be based on skill and not a credit card? Sheesh
I love this community
I bet you like the new consumables too
Lmao the consumables are not OP
gg
Done with being toxic as a moderator on this server? Thanks very much good Sir.
U make everyone bad in the community just for not being an OG. Thatâs not the way it works.
Definitely not the way you are going.
I care if players have enough experience to be competitive
Any potato can buy a t-22
That doesnât mean they belong in ratings
And because itâs a t-22 itâll bounce rounds by accident
I don't play much ratings, just for the camo, but whenever someone mentions to WG about skilled MM they always say just play ratings, so for that reason ratings should be skilled base imo,
#TechTreeOnlyRatings&CW2080
I want something better for ratings. Sorry you donât agree with that
@long spindle skill based? In a competitive game mode? Blasphemy
Someone shouldnt be able to get 6k rating just for playing a lot of rating battles
Is is say 48%
It should be earned
Yes the event is very a big minus for the wr bc the MM doesnât work as it should.
Happens every event. Not just this one. Kinda got used to playing during events lol
We haven't even noticed the change in MM
It's like nothing has happened
I got myself to not play during the events, only if the reward is worth it. But this is a joke. The tank you get for playing idk 1000 battles is not worth it.
Thatâs because as soon as one player gets move for being âineffectiveâ another one gets online đ
Lmao
And repeat
Yip
Ahhh so good if it happens
Maybe even t9 sometimes, coz its fun
@fallen mortar I see youâre an intellectual
Can u get the ratings camo on more than one tank per season? Or can u only get it on one tank per season. (Either camo, 4K or 5k)
only one camo per season in the current rating system
If they removed premium tanks ability to play ratings, it would so much easier with my 263. I hate the Chieftain
Well itâs not the worst idea
Hi
Any reason all of my tanks have become âunsuitableâ for ratings battles. Previously all fine?
Ratings is only tier X right now @rigid quail
Lovely thnx
Ratings should be for 1% of the player base that are not good enough for twister season but self proclamed too good for public games.
@next gull actually a good idea lol
@next gull ok interesting idea, but how would you separate and distinguish these players?
They know it, isn't that enough ?
implementing wn8/7 into the game maybe?
Did WG define these stats ?
no, they were invented by some internet platforms in order to put players in different categories (and it works more precisely than by doing it via winrate)
there's a formula for both wn8 and wn7 ...just look it up on google
That was a rethorical question ;)
@restive dawn thanks. Do u get it when u reach 50 battles or when the season ends?
on the end of the season @normal garnet
Kk
Well atleast i hit 3555 with only 183 but expected worse
Hey. Please explain me how this system works that in this battle I get -4 points? Three 0 dmg guys in my team, I did 4k dmg and still loose points. This is broken.
Always complaining while the system is the same for everyone
It is based on XP I reckon, not on dmg only.
Ofc it is. I bet his spotting wasnât all that great
Good you should always lose points on a loss
How much you do shouldn't matter
on the pc version I dont think u lose points of you are in the top 3 on exp
@low sandal this is how it is in PC
Ah so only first
Tbh I like that system
Winning team:
1-3: ++
4-6: +
7:
Loosing team:
1: +
2-3:
4-7: -
But ofc they won't do it because it would deter the bots who make up most of the matchmaking from playing
Also it will be a lot easier to go up
What if ratings battles had pen indicator textures turned off? Would make it an even more competitive category imo.
Might even make it a more desirable game mode.
@sullen orchid no, then every noob in existence will go "It's free real estate" because they will think think that "rating" was mean to be "fun" as it resembles Realistic battle mode.
The thing they need to do it so make restrictions based on stats of the player.
Like some sort of rating đ¤
Lol that would be fun. Having rating in order to get into rating battles.
WG's website states there is already a filter to match up other players based on their rating..which is in essence their "stat"istical value of their performance in rating battles.
No that system is literlly bot working
Maybe there isn't enough people playing in ratings to make that system work properly đ¤
Thus the suggestion to make it more appealing to the player base.
That is the problem, making it more appealing brings noobs. With a large influx of noobs the system won't be functioning properly either
I have a question, why do I get 6k of credits when I earn like 10k in a battle, I do know credits goes to tank maintineance, shells, etc but, It doesnt matter how much credits I earn in a battle, 10k, 12k, 15k even 18k, I always get the half of it
The 10k credits you earn is before every expense is taken off, but including any boosters or prem time. The figure beneath is generally a bit over half (apart from on good credit earners) because you need to fire more ammo and use consumables etc to get more damage and so to get more credits. This mean you tend to lose about the same proportion each battle.
And why does it say credits 6056 (exactly yes) and then I just got 506, I didnt even shoot or got killed
I mean is it logic what you said, the more shells or resources you use to earn credits, the more credits are taken off ok, but how do you explain not being killed or just waste 2 or 3 shells and only earn 500 of credits from 6k
You have consumables, camo, provisions etc to take off as well
Well then it shouldnt say I got 6k of credits in the notification
When I only got 500, anyway I said I dont even used any, dont think provisions cost 2k each
You earned a total of 6k credits. That is your gross earnings before you pay any out. Your net earnings is 500 because of deductions, its exactly how life works
Yeah but why does it say in the notification you earned 6k, 8k, 500k, the amount doesnt matter, it also doesnt matter what you do, kill 7 and waste 40 shells or being afk without touching the screen, you always get 10-50% of credits
I know why credits are taken off and these stuff but it seem weird since this doesnt happen in the pc
You earned 6k credits in that battle. If you do the same performance again then you will earn the same. But if the second time you dont use consumables etc you will get more of them
You can see exactly what you are spending your credits on in this tab under "detailed" in the post-battle screen
Still being truly unbalanced, this never happened to me in pc, I used to earn 1.6m in 2 days I guess and about 20k of xp, thats ok, it would be really better tbh but in blitz I spent over 10h, maybe 11h to just earn 350k of credits and like 45k of xp
Its really unbalanced I have unlocked some tanks and weapons okey but I cant buy any of them, I keep earning tons of xp and a little bit of credits
then use a premium tank
The idea of blitz is to make you buy a prem
Yeah because I can waste money in buying premium tanks, I do have a lot of money
I have got 2 screenshots where I did 15k and won 12k, and the other one I did 6k and got -1.4k, how? I used a lot of more resources in the first one, really a lot
Also tanks that you have 100% unlocked should earn more credits and free xp, like pc does, but it doesnt
Its absurd that I have to waste half of a day to earn just 350k of credits, sell a tank and then buy a new one that I cant use because I dont have money, is it a game? Where is the fun?
Im sorry but I just dont get it
However forget about the credit refound or whatever, how much do I have to play for a tier 10 tank, a year? I only see players playing with emulators (in pc) and its really unfair btw, know many mobile games that have pc servers.
sounds like you're rushing up the lines too fast
PC is not blitz. Things work completely differently here. If you want to grind credits either use a bdr or buy a prem.
Amd yes as said above you should definitely not rush up lines and try and get a tier 10 as soon as possible. Take time to learn each tier and the different tanks and strategies
I do know how world of tanks works, you cant have a tier 10 in 5 weeks but you can have 4 tier 6 at the same time in 4 days đ¤ I do know players that got their tier 10 in 8 months, I dont want to get a tier 10, Im not even rushing tanks, but its absurd not matter what you say that you spent 12 hours straight just to get 350k of credits
Being tier 5, 7 or 10
Im not god, I cant do 2k damage and 5 kills each game to only learn 10k of credits
I just see that I got tier 5-6 so easly and then I spent days and 0 progress you know? Feel really slow
Again WOTâ blitz, the games are pretty different. If you want to frind credits fast then you are going to have to buy a prem. That is the entire point of the game. If you could easily get loads of credits then noone would buy prems and the game would die. If you are not prepared to buy a prem then dont complain because it is your own choice
The game also would die if players spent days and days or even weeks just to get 15% of the tank, anyway I have been watching so much players playing and these stuff and almost all of them play in pc, with a emulator
I dont know how it works that option that it only match me with same control players, idk how is it called know lol
You dont need an emulator to play blitz on PC, amd no the game is not dying because of that
You can download the game from steam or the microsoft store
You turn same control mode on, and it will put you with players with the same control mode ie mobile đ¤Ś
Thats what I asked before, got confused about that
I get 350k credits in 3-4 games playing Lowe
Whoever thought that shutting down ratings at 9 pm pst and 12 am est on NA is an absolute genius
I suspect there are more timezones on CIS and nearly as many on EU.
I have always believed that rating battles were shutting down at midnight local time.
I have a problem with the 550 xp daily mision, I got 1.1k with a x2 and I thought it was cause the x2, then I did 678 xp and it doesnt give me the mision, anything that Im doing wrong?
@novel viper premium tank
@grim trout I got it for free in huge container:)
Lmao, lucky
come after 1st place
Ready ?
I waited 30 minutes to get into a game, this is stupid WG
Nah
Why it doesn't show any RB stat on NA?
Any mod on? I was about to buy the offer of 4250 of gold for 10⏠and it didnt give me anything, I still have 2k of gold, and I cant buy it again
Its working now
@grim trout the moderation here can't help you with in game issues. Submit a ticket through customer support
how do you do customer supprot? i need it
World of Tanks Blitz official customer service center. Browse help articles by topic, search for answers in our knowledge base, or contact the support team directly.
@ornate spoke
That's a joke.
Meanwhile i was watching some videos on Youtube
Wat
_Ak3_#4860 has been warned.
:((
why is rating battles down
Its over
@strange gale the month has ended therefore rating battles wil be closed for a few days.
damn. i needed to do a challenge for the last daily container
Anyone have a idea about when the rewards will be handed out?
Hi, It's true that the next season we will be able to play in tier 7, 8 and 9 ?
yes I think
When will the rewards be given out for ratings
What rewards ther is no rewards for rating !!! Ah the poor avatar and camo
"We dont plan to change the rating bettes and the system of rewards" - WG basically saying that they dont care about what happens to ratings. People will keep leaving ratings and it will keep getting worse until it dies. Seems to be a bit like what will happen to the game eventually.
Tbh I understand them , I have had played 100 battles in that mode , and that was most toxic , frustrating, and annoying 100 battles in my life
Only way they could turn that mode into more player friendly mode would be to mute everyone ,but then everone would just camp spawn etc
They need to completely redo the system. Muting everyone would be a terrible idea. The main issue is that the rewards are useless and the players you meet are the same as normal battles except they think they are great.
Finish in platinum or diamond league to get a rare camo thatâs been recycled several times now
Yes but why is my 5k rating camo from previous seasons now only 4k rating worth? This is uselessâŚ
I played 150 up to 200 battles just to get the 5k diamond camo on my WZ-113, IS-4 and E 50 M. Now they are just 4k worth.
Thanks. This is great. I love ratings.
Because we got a new diamond camo
Only reason i played ratings was to get the exclusive camo. Now i can just calibrate and maybe play 20 battles and i have the same thing. WG are slowly removing any incentive to play ratings and it is showing in the playerbase.
Agreed. It is not fair for us, the players who had to play a tiny bit harder just to get it while it was exclusive.
Its not the end of the world its just another kick from WG to ratings players
Problem is that ratings cost ressources to WG and no one is happy anyway.
@restive dawn What is new Diamond Camo?
I only saw one in the announcement.
At least this season they are giving out a lot more gold
@pallid arch uuum they do that always for Spring and Twister season because rating battles last 2 months
Yes, but it is still a nice amount of gold
On some tanks its niceeee
Were have you Sean wg say that they are removing that ^ camo (ik there wasnât a photos of it in the ratting announcement but that doesnât mean they wonât have it...
The camo is the same for 4k and 5k, and it is the same camo as the previous 5k camo. This means there is no way of geting the 4k camo again.
Question. Do you get more credits in Ratings battles?? You get slightly more XP but what about credits.
Yes I believe you do
yes you get more credits. Just have a look in the news for the september+october rating battles
thanks. havent checked the news section yet
Hi. Where is it better to do the calibration battles, in tier 7, 8, 9 or 10?
Thatâs a great question haha
Speech 100
@dull vine English please
@dark cedar the tier doesn't matter. Do it in a tank you like. I most of the time calibrate in Bat Chat even though tier 10 is the hardest to get a good calibration.
Oks, thanks by the answer.
@ornate spoke this ain't hideous
Disgustang
When do we get the camo for this season?
@viscid compass do it in your tank with the highest winrate, since more wins (with good damage) gives you a better calibration result
@sharp frigate đ
Can we expect our rating rewards tomorrow as rating battles start on the 5th?
Did someone say ranked?
Knowing wg you will probably get the rewards October...
Ratings battles start today in NA
Can some tell me how the new event works Iâm confused
What a nice start
Rating league Hall of fame isnt working right? I have league and it says i need to complete calibration
I feel accomplished
8k gold is too low for 1st prize should at least be a t10 premium tank. a special premium
i mean people will actually play and try to get 1st position if its a rare premium which you can only get if you get 1st in ratings
i want to get the camo on my tier 9 or 10 chinese tds ;)
do you have to pay credits to replenish the rating camo after battle?
no
You should add in the notifications on which tank(s) we won the camo
Why is it possible to get the diamant camo with a 4K rating? đ˘ thx for making it nothing unique anymore
-
The diamond camo has been devalued. Why delete the platinum camo?
-
The rewards and earnings for play rating still not good enough. Not even close.
- 4k = diamond camo....
Feels like gambling. The less I did the more I won. Steamroll after another.
Nice mode. If you want to feel like youre playing mad games.
Teammates seemed no different from normal games. Calibrated at 3k with SP1C doing pretty badly with 6 wins. My season is done because there is no reason to play any more games. Nice job WG đ
Why does the Rating League leaderboard isnt working?
yes why lol?
who plays ranked in 2019 llol
Who do you compete against in ratings battles? Is it just the players in ratings battles or do they play in the regular MM battles? Trying to figure how this works.
@kind talon Wasn't the first price around 3k gold couple of months ago? 8k gold is okay I guess. If anyone is f2p at least, but I really doubt there are many f2p that reaches top 10.
8k is just not worth the effort
Well probably, although on SEA server good luck getting that many games in ratings anyway.
I did play one season around december last year to get the camo and there were 14 players only at certain hours of the day..
so the old 4k ratings camo is gone forever? And you can now get the old 5k rating from 4k rating?
im leaving this group slow is so damn annoying
@iron zodiac yes. Pretty much sums up how much WG care for the few people who play rating and try to be good at it.
WG fix this matchup system please
We got to wait so long because there r too many TDs
And match wont start because there r only 3 Td limits per team
@warm nexus youâre complaining about 27 seconds?
People have waited in queues for 6 hours
No i m complaining about the matchup system
WHy only 3 TD limit in a team, while the heavies can be matched upto 6 !
Do you want a camping fest?
Yes
I actually rather take teams full of tds instead of teams full of mediums ÂŻ_(ă)_/ÂŻ
Exactly we dont mind putting up 5 TD in a team or even 7
At least matchup will be faster
Then make your own training room
Who do you compete against in ratings battles? Is it just the players in ratings battles or do they play in the regular MM battles? Trying to figure how this works.
Ratings battles are in theory more skill based as all players are roughly at the same ability. Plus sometimes more rewards. Plus a non-WR impacting place to grind stock tanks / build skills etc
But did I miss an announcement? Why are Ratings Battles only available at certain times? (Ie, canât play ratings in the morning on the west coast??)
(Maybe itâs always been certain times, but this is the first time Iâm actually making an effort to play RBs)
Rate my setup
BOI
I'm a mad lad
yeah i love teams with 6 tds that all cant hit and pen anything just because they are blind and stupid
Untrue : they can blindshoot all the bushes. Eventually some will hit..
so why i get warned for saying goddamn and this dude can say stupid ?
Because stupid isnt swearing
So ratings don'r affect your WR? What benifit is getting the rating?
It's either super high damage and a loss or a low damage win.
So I assume wargaming fixed rating battles so Teir 7-10 can play
Now I can finally play rating again
@sterile geyser we are both having that problem
40% players are in every single game
Ran into one that tried pushing me in front of the enemies because he thought I was âcampingâ
wow
@tight sandal tbh you shouldn't even be playing rating if you don't have at least 1 tier 10.
Wow
I am on tier 8 but it's not fully upgraded
And why shouldn't I play without having a tier 10 your making it sound like a requirement or something
the best teams ever
rating should be the peak of the iceberg so you should be very experienced
this is how i like my teams full of super unis that actually know how to play this game and where you can trade shots so some teamplay is possible
?
make Tankenstein 105mm gun available in rating mode for meme sake pls
like i won 1 battle today i played 8 battle
Dont make us look your stats
lol
21- 3 win with my isu152 minimum 2500 or more dmg and still lose...
me too ._. but with my 59-Patton
450 minus at the moment
Wow 2500 damage what an amzing carry đ¤Ś
wait 1v4 i canât do this they are full
Allways top dmg jut sayin....
Beinh top damage doenst really mean anything
You can be top damage and do 1k relatively easily
can i have a game pls
insert my 11 hours waiting for rating
hmmmm
Maybe play a tier where there are more people đ¤Ś
well tier 7,8 is the most popular on Asian server
Not from that screenshot
You are slow đ in EU-Server we already have a few in the diamant league
what can you get from playing ranked?
Hey guys i got platinum and 60 battles on obj 252 u when i got camo?
At the end of the season @zinc salmon
...ok when
50 something more days
I come back to play wotb with a hell bullet shell đ
is the NA ranking leader board broken?
I hate rating battles
then dont play it
Well at least you are gaining in points even if you lost
yo
Instead of making a separate rating battle why not make rating battles= supremacy mode? Open it up for tier 5 to 10 and always available.
I have a 60% wr normally, for 30 day stats at least. Iâve played about 80 games in my is3, and about 10 of them Iâve lost but my rating hasnât decreased much at all. This is how bad teams are.
it's twister season so yeah you should expect the matchmaking didn't give you team that really competitive because the influx new rating player
@neat tree no, no thanks. That is a horrible idea. Why open a battle type that is supposed to be skill based to low tiers?
Because the match making is based on their rating? Why the elitist attitude? Rating battles supposedly is based on their ratings, right? Then new players meet new players, good veterans meets each other. Bad players meet bad players.
You are forgetting re rolls which will destroy that type of match making. As the game will think they are new even though they may have had a lot of experience and put them with some players that just started playing the game. Also how do you distinguish a veteran, or based on what do you call someone a veteran?
Battle count? Or WN8?
Anyway this is a tangent on what I said. Let rating battles = supremacy mode. Or supremacy battles = rating battles. This would solve the lack of players problems in smaller servers. I don't know about you, but I don't enjoy waiting for 3 to 5 minutes to join a battle. I just want to play, not twiddling my thumbs waiting for a battle.
How is it tangent when I just followed up on what you said in the previous post? Also if you just want to play play the random battles. The problem with supremacy being only for rating battles (as you suggested) will mean that whoever comes to play rating battles will have no clue wtf those numbers at the top mean therefore will just quit after a few battles as they are not used to that and supremacy is often quite different from encounter.
Not knowing the numbers on top will be cured quickly in 3 or 4 battles. I already know how to play supremacy mode when I was in tier 2 courtesy of YouTube videos.
You are right that random public game waiting time 1 minutes or less. My suggestion will make rating battle as quickly matched as that. And also skill based supposedly, or at least less lopsided in skills.
And therefore I repeat, how do you determine which player is skilled or not? Because you want to match up players by skill.
Er, was that not the point of calibration before rating battle?
Rating battles do not put only or bad players against bad players. The MM balences rating between teams but thete is not limit to the range of the rating in one team.
Rating should be an elitist game mode as it is the most competitive thing you can play with random people. Rating is already bad enough having tier 7 and 8 because it is too easy for people to buy their way in. Also there are more OP tanks at this tier so someone who only played WZ 120 FT to get to 5k will not be as skilled as someone who made it there in a grille in the same amount of battles. Ratings should be tier 10 only, but for the smaller servers it would work woth tier 9 and 10 to reduce queue times. We want to increase the playerbase in ratings but we dont want to encourage any 500 battle noob to be playing a game mode designed for the best.
If people at tier 10 still have no idea how to stop the reds winning by points in supremacy you think they will learn what the rating points system is in 3-4 battles?
Calibrating in youe system would not be accurate. For example people could calibrate in a say a krupp. They would be able to carry the noobs that have just started tier 5 so much easier than someone calibrating at tier 10. This means people who play thr lower tiers will seem to do better which means anyone going for the season prizes will just club tier 5 constantly. This isnt good for anyone.
@neat tree
Thank you for the responses.
- If people don't understand how they get their rating points, then the failure is on wargaming for not sufficiently communicating how to calculate the points.
- Create ratings for each tiers. Such as tier 5 ratings is different from tier 6.
- If rating battles is to be restricted for the elites, then my suggestion that supremacy battle = rating battles, can be restricted only for tier 9 and 10. So in supremacy battle tier 8 is always top tier, while tier 9 and 10 only ratings battle.
People grinding tier 9 can do it in encounter mode, which should take a considerable amount of battle given the xp needed to get the top modules. - Match making should group people based on their ratings. Sufficiently wide range so can be covered in +/- 1 tier. Then the people who complained about rigged MM can find other excuses for being bad at this game.
The point is to make rating battles popular and not making people waiting for a long time to get into battle.
You cannot expect noobs who have just made it to tier 5 to read and understand how ratings works.
Creating that many different ratings is pointless because then you have single tier ratings and so queue times are huge and there are no rewards.
There is no reason to turn supremacy battles into rating battles. It just needlessly complicates things and takes away supremacy battles for people who dont want to play ratings but do want to play tier 9 and 10.
hello i have somone to report for ban named aleksandrbojko513 was hacked your game is be invisible on the cap and i go on the cap and the base continue to be captured
If the consensus is to make ratings battles available only for the elites then drop ratings battle from general availability. Put it under tournament section, available only to tier 10 tanks and only done on peak hours of the server daily, such as from 18:00 to 20:00.
Don't halfway do it like now. Either it's open for all or only elites. Choose one or the other.
By open to all I meant without any restrictions on players qualifications like now.
Making it open at peak times and putting it under the tournament section would just drive player participation down even more. What WG need to do is actually give out some valuable rewards and fix the points system so it takes skill to get to 5k. Nothing more can happen to ratings until more people who should be there start playing it. It should be a change from normal battles but the quality of teammates does not change. Unfortunately WG have said they arent going to change anything for a bit and so ratings is just going to die.
đ¤
Rating teams are disgusting
i wonder why
I just think of ratings as random battles with a rating, since WG letâs anyone do them
In ratings you should be teamed with people around the same rating as you. But, this doesn't work as not enough people play ratings. So, either the rewards needs to be increased or different rewards for lower leagues needs to be added. Like X amount of gold for finishing in a certain league or credits/free xp but you need a certain amount of battles to get these rewards, (e.g 50-100 battles).
Also only tiers 8 and 10 should be ratings as they provide the most skill, and stop the tier 7/8 spam, making ratings better for most players as teams won't be mixed tiers.
@quartz aspen exactly! For now it's a random battle with brownies points đ đ đ
@agile sphinx you don't want ratings to die nor do you want to open to a wider participation. If it's restricted to elites there will be no doubt about it's eventual death.
This is a mobile game, if it doesn't attract new players everyday it will die. Players who sticks around for 5 years + is basically less than 1% of total players population. The majority will play for less than 1 year.
I am player number 2 billions something, how many people play the game each day? Less than 75.000 each day for ALL servers.
For ratings battle to exist they need to be attractive to that 75.000 persons, not the elite 100 scattered over 4 main server with 24 hours difference.
And that may be the ultimate solution. Create a separate server for the top 200 players worldwide where they only play tier 8 to 10. Of course they are also banned to join the regular plebian server of RU, EU, NA and ASIA unless it's an alternate account.
That solution is just stupid
If you increase the rewards mire nubs will come but I'd love to make it T10 only and then give like 100 gold for all who finish above 5k or something except those top 100 or how its rn they'll get higher rewards. Ratings with prem acc and 30B is really good for making credits and i have quite good teams most of the time
That is not a bad idea actually. If you reach diamond, you get a small reward (not including cammos) which might have encourage more people to climb to diamond (especially PC players as they don't have the option to watch ads). Also about the tiers, I don't see why rating shouldn't be T9 and T10 like it was when it first came out.
Good players dont usually have the time to play 10h a day
Reaching diamond league is pretty easy ... for pro players it is even easier. Should take about 150 battles max. Also pro players earn gold from tourneys so 250 gold wouldn't be something of big interest.
I was commenting on wallet potatos idea of own server for pros. There would be hyper long ques due to the low amount of players, Unless they play 10h a day
i wait 24minutes....3400rat
We need a better mm for rating battle am always with 60% reroll with less than 2k average dmg on their t10
@fallen mortar 100 gold for finishing above 5K rating? I can get that clicking ad for 2 days. Even on PC I can get that in 1 week missions. Why would I trouble myself for that measly reward? Add 2 zeros behind for top 10 players rating, then you are talking. 10.000 gold is better than 6 months clicking advertisement. It also should buy some prammo or camouflage. That is an incentive.
@sage verge Playing 10 hours a day is the definition of professional players, people whose job is playing video games. Working for 60 hours per week is common even in the US for certain industries. Why should a video game player be working for less time?
Nevertheless why should a separate server for top 100 players for each public server be having a long queue time? There are 400 people in the server population. There is only one queue, first come first serve. Players can only play in tier 8 to 10 as a bonus for those who are nostalgic about +/-2 match making.
Assuming everyone plays for 2 hours each, there are about 30 players every time. Why would there be a long queue time?
As a bonus for the common players there would be somewhat less salt in the regional server. Win win solution. Top players are not bothered by the Windex, the Windex get somewhat less insult.
To keep getting fresh blood in the 400 add a promotion and degradation scheme. Those who fell for less 50% winning rate in 90 days get demoted to the server he came from while the next top players from that regions get promoted to replace him/her.
i slowy start to question your sanity ... there is no such thing as a sponsored E-sport league for Blitz since its to small compared to big games like LoL and yes there is a bigger event once a year but you cant live from playing only WoTB and 2nd too high price attract noobs and bots battle spaming to get thier ratings up, and yeah mobile players have adds but as a PC player i dont have those and i dont play enough to get my weekly containers since there are always toon missions and i dont toon after all or pretty rarely so i´d be happy for every little bit of gold i can get by playing ranked and i never get to the top 10 ranked players since they probably play all day
i get bored after less then 1h hour playing WoTB soo never ever going to play 10h a day thats insane
I play on PC myself, but nothing prevent me from installing the game client on my phone with the same name just to get those gold from ad clicking.
I didn't say that professional players just play WoT blitz only. The one that brings up 10 hours playing was not me. I said the definition of a professional is one who's livelihood depends solely on that job. A professional gamers should put the hours necessary to get that livelihood. Just like a lawyer, doctor or carpenter. If he or she needs to do 12 hours daily to be able to make a living, then so be it.
Now if what people meant by pro players = great players then say great players. Great players is not always a professional players. I don't know which kind of players @sage verge meant, but he/she wrote "pro players don't play 10 hours a day". That is the statement I disagree.
Speaking of putting the necessary hours, ther are people who have played this game more than 120K battles, which for 5 years that meant over 100 battles a day or more than 5 hours daily.
PS my sanity is well as attested by 100 people daily đ đ đ
@neat tree if your income is purely based off this game I suggest you change ur career
People that play this game 5h+ a day are usually the above average kind
No worries, this is just a game I played because I like blowing things up in a game.
And yes, I was flabbergasted when I saw those statistics on blitzstars.
Something you guys might not understand is that the mm system on rateing tries to keep the total rateing number the same for both teams. This is why the higher you climb the more lower rated players will be on your team and thus harder to win. I think itâs a splendid system that WGing got perfect
no i get better players the higher i get
Of course. If their are enough available
True but im pretty much okay with ratings rn but i only play 3 tanks 30b stb and foch 155
Hi ..how is it possible to have enemy with enough rating points to be in higher league ,play in lower league
not enough players
3 battles in a Row 7 vs 1 reds win, pretty balanced MM
think of it this way, you're so good mm balances you by putting bad players on your team
lol nice one @torpid walrus
if you're gonna be toxic, be a different kind of toxic
@spare path cheers ...thought that was the case
Another thing I tell myself to keep my cool is that I get tunneled because they know how great I am XD
I am not actually that great though.
Just make ratings tier 10 only, Wargaming. Over 2/3 of teams I was the only person above 50% WR on my team. Had even a guy with 28% and 34-38%, howâs that a good gaming experience for anyone?
I see alot of this too. I think players that bad hope to be carried, or they come to ratings battles to play and not further lower their win rate. They donât really care about getting a decent rating anyway. But to them its play that doesnt mean anything, they stay at 40% and donât have to worry about dropping to 30%.
if you are 28% it means you are litterlly trying to lose. being afk would give you a higher winrate
Get rid of ratings missions. A big chunk of players are not interested in ratings and only play them to get missions done. We don't care if it takes 12 battles to get 3 wins for mission or what our rating is at the end of it. We just want our mission crates.
It's an incentive for players to play ratings, but also hurts ratings due to people not caring and just wanting to win and get their mission done
Lol. Last rating season was tier 10 only.
I remember people complaining about low winrate players. @low kayak how tier 10 only would fix anything ?
Would decrease the number of clueless players as many of them donât have tier 10 tank. Hard to get xp and credits for tier 9 if you have 31% WR and 200 avg dmg with 800 games on their account đ And last rating season with tier X only was way more playable than this zoo we have now.
Calibrated into platinum and get noobs ofc
@shut tapir welcome to rating battles
Since the change to tier 10, I am getting nowhere anymore in rating anymore. Even struggle to stay in gold, while before I always got in platinum. How is that? Anybody any idea?
Who wants to tell him
đ
Looks like you do...
I don't know me#3202 has been warned.
Should i wait more?
i dont wait 15minutes to get 40wr guys in my team and lose...
matchmaking is a meme
Thereâs no incentive to play ratings battles. All you get is some avatar which lasts for a month and other useless things. Only the top of the top get decent rewards, and even the rewards given is not worth the time and effort that you take to grind. Maybe to populate the ratings queue, WG should actually give proper prizes instead of throwing people into ratings so that they can complete missions. I mean, it seems logical, right?
well, im top 8 on eu right now so i have some chances to get good rewards, but with this queue waiting time and after getting noobs its imposible to even try passing to top 4
These are the joys of skill-based MM everyone is asking for, I guess.
Hey atleast its not a t22
Why does it take so long to get into a rating game with a tier 7 tank
After what period of unplaying time my rating would be lost? One week or longer?
60days for this season, your rating of August is already reset
hmm
hi not done ratings for ages...any 1 know what decides which league you get in...damage or wins
To calibrate I think damage and winrate unfortunately
After that Damage and surviving
yea cheers...1 my clan answered me on it...but ty
@iron zodiac try to join during peak hours for your server. See blitzstars to find out the hours. It should help.
introduce low Tier 1-6 rating beside the normal Tier 7-10 raring đđ newbies also want to have fun A N D they might disturb less in higher Tiers đ
bad idea nobody wants 5k ranking players that just sealclubbed thier way to 5k and have fun with those waiting times
Bill gates said that. life is not fair
I'm at 4k even after playing Obj 140 with he ammo only for about 20 battles
I'm not a pro, I just threw my wallet at wg and played Skorpion G
Bru
Iâm so stooopid. Instead of calibrating ez I did it at tier X so I got 3.5k. Now I gotta grind for 4K -_-
Imagine caring about rating
rating is so fun
Lol I am a noob in this game..
We all @ornate spoke
Lol XD
Can u make a more skill based matchmaker for ratings because of those bots who have no clue how to play ratings or anytime type of battle for that matter
take a look at pinned messages pls
Bruh..
so do I have this right, we don't get the rating camos for getting over 4k until the end of the season?
Yes @neat halo
The leaderboard on the website isn't working again.
Since there is no channel for realistic mode, Iâll put it in here. Realistic mode, which is supposed to be so fun, is a failure on the Asia server. There are hardly any players playing and it is very difficult to get a game in even after waiting for a Long time. Maybe we need a 3 v 3 or 4 v 4 scenario instead of 7 v 7 to at least get some games in. @ornate spoke
@ornate spoke did you calibrate in 5k?
yes
Did you win all 10 and basically had and avg damage of 3k?
Well i won every game of the calibration and started with 4600 rating
ahhh still very high
Wg has to make ratings restricted to a certain wr
like 50%?
Iâve had the same 40% pos teams for 12 battles in a row and have only won 4 of them
iâm always with 40 or 37% wr
What are the odds of having the same teams for 12 battles in a row?
@pearl shale very high
Yep. This gamemode is pointless. If there are this many 40%ers running around, ratings might as well be removed.
LOL i had a teamate the other night 39% wr 338 avg damage
Lol
@rocky fox tier 8 seems more popular. Tier 9 and 10 is a wasteland. Tier 6 is good. Try to join during 18:00 to 21:00 UTC+8.
My suggestion a few posts above is to group tier 5-7 in a battle together and another at tier 8-10.
Or replace the supremacy mide with realistic mode for that weekend.
Ratings are fun once you have got till about 4.3k rating, everything under that you have to carry carry carry. I played 200 games and won 100. Went from 3400 up to 4300 lol.
If you lose just try and lose with as much damage and try to stay alive till last, that way you will lose a little rating points.
And when you play to save your HP and get your damage up in each game then you will gain a lot when you win.
Generally I lose not more than 10 when I lose but gain about 35 when I win
So basically with 50% winrate I still went up 900 points
Carrying is much more fun than being the average one
đ
2594 calibration? Yikes
At that point I would attempt to go lower and see how low can u really get
That's working purposely
You have to try to get a rating that low
Can you fix the ratings
We wanted ratings exclusively for any 1 tier but what we get here is 4 tier rating system bonanza....the queue is as long as 10-15min for a single match here in Asia
I guess NA is facing the same problems....man its so frustrating that to play 3-4min match you need to wait for 10min
Ratings is literally kinda like gambling for me rn.. I get into platinum.. I want to get even more points so I play more. I lose it and get put back into gold and repeat again like a million times..
I tried to see how low I could get my rating to go. In calibration I lost 9/10 battles (none on purpose or due to trolling). I got below 2K. I canât recall the exact figure, but I I believe it was around 1.4K, I didnât touch it again after that for the entire season. The highest I ever managed was 5.7K. (I calibrated at exactly 4K that season)
When you reach 4500+ ratings the queue time is like 5-10mins
Thats really frustrating......
Wg should consider Asia as a server too ...yeah majority of players are in EU and RU server but the more you neglect a server the more players will stop playing in that server
I made it my goal to get calibrated into bronze before
Had a solid 1600 lol
Have to be at tier 10, spot no one, and kill yourself, thatâs how you get low lol
xD
Omfg again!!! Now Iâm getting trolls in ratings. Just outright trolls
WG u guys have to fix MM in ratings, itâs bs. And make it restricted to a certain winrate, like 52%
guess im doing something right since my MM is good and my waiting time is long but most of the time worth it
@fallen mortar Iâve lost 5 in a row and Iâve been waiting for 6 minutes each game
same but i havent lost to many points so im happy xD
and i havent played in 2 days which makes me even more happy
Last game I asked for help for 3 minutes. No answer. WG has to change this mode. Itâs unplayable
NA wait times rip
rating is easy to climb in teir 8 with object 252U
@normal garnet dude actually stop crying and get good. I've seen you play and it's nothing special. Want to do good in ratings? Actually get good at the game.
lol
@bleak cliff I know u didnât just say that kid. If Iâm bad at the game then why do I have a 61.31% wr and am actually going up in ratings? And no one is even inviting u to the conversation. Itâs hard when 7 games in a row u get bs rng and sht teams
I donât think this is the right place for a dispute
@bright bear ur right, Iâll just DM this 53%er
oof
silver to gold in one week
Approx date for the day when only Tech tree tanks get rating points?
Donât worry i can wait... just hope to see a date so i can begin ratings again then.
(From an owner of Wz-1FT.. Iâm only interested in balance and engaging gameplay)
You lost đ¤ˇ
All those mm complaints get annoying after some time
@latent jolt ha I'm above you lol
no comment here but yeah. The t9 off meta struggles are real rn
Probably last battle on his calibration and maybe an M in this tier 8 battle?
Just to make sure. The tank above each tier is the tank youâve played the most ratings in that tier, right?
Yes
And if you play 50 games in that tier, the camo will go to the tank that is displayed
Is it true you can now get the 5k cammo at 4k for twister?
Yes
i somehow manage to calibrate at 2k
Big oof
I didnât do too well and only got 3200
Is it possible to calibrate at bronze
it is @molten whale
Ugh just got 3850
@ornate spoke have the ultimate screen of kv-2 sadness.Update time NA
Since One Week between 4500-4600đ this MMđ
The only messages that get deleted are the ones where you swear or name and shame @Arkaliandes [OURS]#3521
ive seen people with 0 % wr at 5k
ranked doesnt effect Wr so a 23% player could play like a 70% and nobody would notice
Hello
No name and shame pls
NeroTiny#4881 has been warned.
We don't call out other players here.
Nowhere. We simply don't call out other players on this server. If you have an issue submit a ticket through customer support, do not try to publicly shame them here.
@ornate spoke try rolling swarms discord server
The near-diamond ratings experience on NA
Honestly only tier 10 ratings were so much better đŚ
@loud minnow I know your pain. But diamond rating = 10 minutes to an hour queue time, which is extremely annoying for only 3 minutes of gameplay.
ik, I could probs dig up lots of old screenshots of queue times
I just do homework while playing ratings because I only play the game like 20% of the time
ha
@bleak cliff dude same
Lel
It would be nice if the rewards on rating battles were bigger, I'm pretty sure it would be played a lot more like this
Agree
Warning logged for SCPGamer3.0#6559. They were not warned.
@ornate spoke
Remove supremacy from ratings battles. Make everybody fight
how about no ?
So you one of those guys who likes to chase bases and not fight?
No I'm a fighter but tourneys are tactical and so should be ranked and both are supremacy
Ratings should reward intelligence as well as skill. Supremacy does that if you are smart enough to cap and hold 2 bases you deserve to win
^
Should remove encounter battles if anything
Does anyone know how to receive the rating camos. I reached platinum does that mean I get platinum camo even if my rating drops to gold. And what does the 50 battle minimum mean. Can someone explain please thanks
They give them to you after the season ends. Arrival times may vary
@ornate spoke so you get the Camo in your most played tank after 50 battles at one tier and are at least in platinum. You will receive the Camo after the rating season ends
And I will receive the camo even if I later drop down into gold for example? Or do I have to stay in platinum until the season ends to get it? @bleak cliff
You have to stay in platinum until the season ends
Okay gotcha thanks
Leaderboard is down again...
No they need to remove supremacy it sux
You can disable it.... or just donât play ratings
Where do I submit an idea for an additional option in mm?
not here
Why aren't people playing realistic games??? I want to play but I'm kept waiting for 10 minutes.. it's ridiculous. Why even devolop such an amazing game mode without advertising it and encouraging players to play the realistic mode????
And even after taking the trouble to wait, all I can see is 10 players waiting... And that too people take all tiers of tanks... None can get any game... Some try to build concentration in a particular tier for example 8. Then the waiting list somehow reaches 7 or 8 players... Even then we had to wait longer... Nothing happens...
Atleast put 3 vs 3, 4 vs 4 like that... Just let it happen.
Same problem in realistic as in ratings: they are hard. Most players like easier games. So WG needs give more incentives to play realistic or ratings. Higher credit earnings would surely help.
There is need of better reward in ratings, there is no need of any reward inbrealistic mode. But I agree that waiting time are ridiculously long in realistic mode : WG should loose the MM conditions
Lets make tier 5 match tier 10, epic meme
The reasons queue times are long is cause the majority of players on NA dont seem interested in it, and even during the busiest time on the server, rarely anyone is in the realistic battle queue
That's waht I'm talking about. WG should do something about it, to make realistic games interesting... Like @late mural said, WG should increase the credits and also introduce realistic mode specific containers. This will definitely improve the player count of the realistic games.
Lets make tier 1 match tier 10
Wtf? @surreal kettle you know the results. Why even bother doing it?? A simple ramming with Maus is enough to blast 'em off
Maybe a game mode where 5 lower tiers (by 3-5) battle against higher tier (By 3-5)
i jsut wanna see people get wrecked
Allow +/-2 or 5v5, 3TD/team... in realistic. 3min wait even when 20 players are available at tier +/-1 is ridiculous.
Rating is different, you are supposed to compete against players with similar rating in a fair environment.
How about you stop discussing that in the ranked chat? And the solution is stop realistic and go for mad games again the fact that you can grind stock tanks should be enough to encourage people to play.
Most players certainly don't either know or care about the grinding stock tanks for "free" option.
5 vs 5 (or even 4 vs 4) battles would be a good solution for the queue problem. I guess it would also help with TD spam in realistic mode.
Don't think that would help that much. Had a game the other day with 8 TDs
What's this "stock tank" bit about?
new mm?
i think the new MM is working very good @ornate spoke ??
thats the karma for playing WZ
money wouldnt be a problem but i cant stand people crying about MM in such tanks clubbing thier ranking up at T8
But getting to 5k in a WZ120FT needs the same skill as getting there in a tier 10... /s
NeroTiny#4881 has been warned.
obviously xD
Hahahahahaha I dont get it, all I see is 2 ratings teams that have a difference of 300 points if we dont include the provisional ratings for people who haven't calibrated @vivid shore
Today I have played 4 hours of rating battles and this is what I have found:
Only 9 battles, all at tier 10
7 wins, gaining an average of 11 rating per win, 2.6k damage average per battle
Queue time average for those 9 battles over 4 hours: 26.6 minutes of queue time just for one battle, that lasts for about 3-4 minutes.
Now my current rating is 5451, which I know contributes to the wait time as the teams need to have a balanced average rating score, but the amount of wait time to battle time is horrible, but I am fine with it as the teams were very competent in how they played.
There needs to be some sort of incentive, (better than there already is) for players to play and try and reach the higher rating league. Last season it was a Camo, which has now been more widely available to 4000 rating instead of 5000 rating to receive it.
I suggest that there be a different Camo, permanently for these two rating leagues as that gives some sort of incentive to go for besides a top position for gold.
Besides incentive, ratings should only be tiers 8 and 10, as those are the most competitive tiers.
But I also liked when ratings were exclusively tier 10 as that provided a good wait time and just a better experience overall as the teams were better as there were no âuselessâ tier 9s that canât do anything, or get nuked by a td, rendering them more useless.
Also, the scoreboard shouldnât be down in the middle of the season, or at all for that fact, (yes I know technical issues happen), as players like to see where they sit on the leaderboard, and how much they need to climb to receive the end of season rewards.
@bleak cliff I thoroughly like the idea of punishing players for being good by wasting their time looking for a match
What a great system
Seriously though. Make it 5v5. Make it only tier x. Tighten up the points spreads.
I was just saying I don't mind waiting for a decent team, but it's very annoying. There needs to be something better inplace to get more players or change how many on a team
There isn't one, and that's the part of the problem
Split tiers is stupid on na and Iâm guessing asia
We donât have enough players to support it
The first issue of rating is the lack of players at least on na
There's no point to playing ratings unless you want a top position or to get to 4k rating to get a camo. That's it for most/all players, besides grinding xp on a tank without your stats being effective
Itâs made worse by being in 4 different tiers
The top rating spot should be 10k gold
Yeah, I think it's like 8k gold right now
There either needs to be better rewards for top 5 / top 10 or a better match maker/team balancer
Mm isnât the issue I donât think
The teams average points are usually pretty close
Thatâs it âworkingâ
The wait times, which are determined by the balancing of rating of either team
Points arenât indicative of skill though
Which is another issue entirely
People who spam battles in op tanks can get to 5k without being worthy of diamond
Yeah, especially at tier 8. The wz 120 was and probably still is the tier 8 rating meta if you want to climb
I saw a 47% player with 700+ battles hit 5k
And before anyone yells at me for win rate shaming, I understand
Wr doesnât always mean skill
But. You wouldnât expect to see a 47% player in diamond league
Again. Spammed tier 8
Tier 8 ratings are very, tank based. Tier 8 is just a mess of a tier when played semi competitvely
I would like to see ratings be tech tree only
If itâs about skill, wallets are removed from the equation
Everyone has equal access to everything. Crew. Equipment. Consumables. Tanks.
It would make a difference in how it's played. And adds more skill and thinking to the table
Plus. You would have to think instead of playing a Wz td and being high tier
Yeah
I would like to see maps be shrunk down and made into 5v5. I think that would make things more dynamic.
Tiers 7 and 9 shouldn't be in ratings as well. They are just fill tiers and aren't anything useful in terms of team balance, and just add extra queue time for people playing at tier 8 and 10
Currently thereâs no real difference between regular and rating battles
Make ratings tighter and more team based
1/5 > 1/7
Each person has a far greater effect on if you win
5v5 and smaller maps would definitely separate ratings from regular bsttles, and it would make it appealing as it's something different
If you're losing a lot and care about your rating then just stop playing, most likely the teams will stay the same and you'll keep losing
What if the map was only between the red lines? Shrunk down to encourage more brawls and focus fire instead of aimlessly driving around
It would make battles more strategic, but also possibly end quicker
5v5 would make it easier to carrier tho, so it depends on the map pool as some maps are harder to work with than others
Either sizing down already existing maps or making completely new ones would be good, giving more diversity inside the game
Or even just having a difference in rewards for a tier 8 ratings player and a tier 10 player. The tiers could be split into two different leagues, tier 10 first places could get 10k gold and tier 8 could get 8k gold for example. But this could change the amount of players either way tho.
@bleak cliff make each tier have a unique camo
Yeah, camo for each tier/league and for top 3
I think if you shrink some maps some people will just feel encouraged to camp
For a game with as much RNG as tanks, making games more focused on shooting and brawling is stupid. If we wanted to play a game based on "who has better fine motor skills" then we would be playing Counter strike or something.
I like the idea of 5v5 though, since it's got the same effect as having bigger maps, and fewer players on the board increases the impact of a skilled player.
Iâd honestly like to see more brawling engagements though...RNG or not. the current play style can get a bit stale...for me at least.
I see your smaller maps idea and raise you this.
What if the map started at normal size but the redline shrunk over time forcing all tanks to move closer and closer to the center of the map after a while.
But how would the game force the 6 spawn campers be forced to move without a load of bugs? Oh wait maybe thats a great idea, if you get hit by the red line you get yeeted into the sky like the bt7 glitch...
You lose hp like in water.
Wow, mixing global warming floods with ww2...đ¤
The first issue to me is the queue time/lack of interest of the player base. 5v5 on the current maps might be a solution : easy to implement for WG, less players needed.
There will always be players finding their way to reach high rating with the 'wrong' tank or whatever. Nothing to complain about, they are playing by the rules. It is unlikely that they reach the top 10 though.
@pearl shale rating battle royale
I donât know if the idea of a storm is good though. Mobility based tanks still need room so it would defeat the purpose of them a bit
Certainly a good thought though
Okay. So as you can see I sat in queue for 1 BATTLE. One stupid tier 10 battle of ratings. I sat in queue for 1 hour and 40 minutes
This is plainly stupid as my comptitor is just 30 rating below me, and if I have to wait so long for a battle where I might gain 11 rating or lose 11 rating, then what's the point.
There honestly needs to be some sort of failsafe where if a player is sat in queue for X amount of time, (letâs say 20 minutes), then they get queue priority, meaning they will be out in battle no matter what the âbalancing of teamsâ or whatever the match making algorithm is. It just gets bypassed as, who in their actual sane mind wants to sit in queue for longer than 10 minutes for a game, let alone 1 hour and 40 minutes
Throughout my time in queue I saw the numbers, for tier 10 constantly go up and down, up to more then enough for a battle, then suddenly they went down to 1 or 2 people in tier 10. This went on constantly, and constantly I wasnât in battle.
yep that happened to me last time I tried in ratings
i saw someone waiting for 10h and then leaving the mm
Current season ends at October 1st?
31st of October it ends
I found my spirit tank for rating
made to diamond so đ
about time
And guess what happens if in rating games you only match up against the same tier. Well you don't need to guess because I will tell you. Ratings in NA and ASIA will die completely. EU rating will be horrible and RU ratings won't be affected much. So you propose to kill 2 servers and horribly damage another one just so that you get in the same tier match up? Interesting but I refuse.
I have another idea. Why not leave rating as it is
Tier 8 only was horrible and very very few people got to diamond. For tier 10 it was kind of fun but that is because you are the highest tier of all meaning that by playing tier 10 you can never be bottom tier in. Tier 9 and 10 together were the best when ratings was first introduced.
ya same tier 8 or ten only 4 rated is a no didnt play that cus i cant get the skins for all the tanks them seasons.
Is it hard to get to 5k points in rating?
If you have time to spare and you can bear the playerbase then no
Just keep playing and eventually you will get there unless you have like a 35% WR in rating
Rating is my second favorite game mode after mad games.
That is why I want to see it made batter
Ratings could be a great gamemode but WG seem to be showing extreme reluctance to do anything to improve it. The points system and rewards system needs an overhaul and then it should bring in more players so the MM can be fine tuned. I dont see why WG dont have anyone corresponding with the playerbase about this (its not like they cant afford it) or why WG have said they wont change ratings for a while. It seems fairly stupid to neglect the veteran part of your playerbase which is what ratings caters too.
Ribble has sent 7 messages here, the last one in march confirming you need to play 50 battles to get rewards. Noone else from WG (afaik) has sent anything. There isnt really any point having this in chat with devs if we just get ignored đ¤ˇ
why are there so many afks in ratin batles
Because the queue is so long they forget they were playing the game.
like geez just play teir 8 1 min que time every time
Wish my queue times were that short đ
finally im in diamond league
welcome to the club
lol thnxs
Hurrayđś
guess who won this? Ratings battle,totally unfair when itâs supposed to be! So block me for a day I donât care,sort the âmatchingâ out!
Thats weird, I just see a fair 7v7 game. Is it some kind of illusion that only you can see through?
Lol
I mean itâs his fault for playing tier 7, which is a grantee bottom tier and pretty much worthless when facing all the strong tier 8 tanks
But tier 7 and 8 ratings is a perfectly valid and sensible thing to have in the game /s
I'm just unlucky
cant go futher 4800 in 5 days
and now im getting down to 4500 again
this is not funny anymore
all the efforts i make to go up, just for losing all of it in just 1 hour
That moment that you cant gain points when the system is literally made so you always gain points đ¤Ś
If youâre losing a lot of battles then just stop play. Chances are that youâll just keep losing, so just stop for the day.
nah keep playing take it from me
If you cant get higher maybe its where you should be
Just think of new methods to play and try to change a bit, maybe then you'll go up
Just stop playing. Do other things. When your brain relaxed. That mean you can play.
Better rewards = more players = shorter queue = perfect
Can we get a month of rating battles with the old +2/-2 matchmaker? I just wanna see how itâs gonna be. Nobody gets hurt and the data would be interesting
more player = more idiots = insane frustration during calibration = but still not to many good player
More players = reduced rating span = more enjoyable games
@minor salmon maybe an event. Not ratings
@fallen mortar More players = more idiots but also more good players = same skill of teams but shorter queue times and the chance to renew the MM system so you get less idiots
The amount of idiots that will flood ranked is at least twice as big as the amount of good players since after what I noticed many people just quit during or after calibration just because they meet so many idiots in that time since they have no actual rating
I am 3462 rating, why is this moron in my game?
was it your opponent?
@zenith trellis so he is a moron because he is better than you?
It is funny how humour is lost in written communication.
I bet that guy said the same thing when he saw you and your 3.4k rating. đ
I get any where from 900-2000 damage per battle and lose just about every battle, 50% of time top scorer. Started out at 2900 now down to 2100. Usually get trampled by nubs trying to get a kill and blocking or running over me, and then they get killed. Team mates will go out and have a shoot out with another tanks and completely expose their sides or rear and just stand there taking shots. They will split up at beginning of match never to come together again because they are blown to bits. I am not the greatest player by any means but losing all my ratings because of a bunch of nubs that don't have a clue is very frustrating. I don't blame the nubs for their poor performance ( Heck mine isn't that great, 30 day WR 55.80% Career 47.13%) but the number of 0-7, 0-6, 0-5, 0-4, battles is crazy. I don't have a clue how to fix this, any ideas.
I am talking about ratings battles only.
@lavish adder no he just laughed his balls out because he won with a fair rating battle đ
I am confused if a 47%er calling others nubs then who are the nubs?
@placid dawn it depends on many factors. One is what is your 30wr for ? Tier 4 or tier 8 ? Let's assume it is tier 8. Then 2100 rating is quite low, indeed. The teams you have are unable to hold a position (provided they are trying to). The slightest imbalance, a shot bounced, a tank less... and you have a landslide effect : the imbalance can not be compensated for and amplifies rapidly.
If you think you are the best asset of your team, take a tier 8 mobile tank with some armour. It will be easier for you to help your team where you think it is important to. Go cautiously back to the basics of your role without expecting help from your team.
The screen shot I shared,the enemy had 3 strong armoured heavies including 2 premiums,so they also had more hit points to try & deplete, & on that map its going to be a win for the opposing team with that armour, almost every time! The teams were not evenly matched as is supposed to be the case with ratings battles!
@sonic sedge bruh. The enemy had armor and HP you had DPM and penetration. What is your point.
DPM with a helsing that isnât that fast & wonât pen either of those heavies from the front without being destroyed 1st..you try it!
You are complaining about pen when you chose to play a tier 7 with bad pen in ratings? Nice logic there... (Also you can easily pen the vk100 and the 112 frontally, and you can just about pen the lowe with AP, and definitely with prammo)
Armour does not always win on that map, I generally go to the desert, cap the base and then either hold taking shots between the train and the tracks ot flank and pick off the reds from the back.
Also if you are trying to 1v1 a tier 8 heavy frontally in a helsing them you are clearly doing something very wrong.
@sonic sedge
Sure, helsing "isn't fast" with a top speed of 60km/h. Also if you fire APCR in Helsing the DPM only drops by 400 which really isn't a lot. Also look at what the person said above.
"The person", how flattering of you đ¤Ł
top speed of 60kmh but not on sand..Also you expect a tier 7 to go head to head with a heavily armoured harder hitting tier 8? yeah brilliant logic
and the gun isnât all that accurate unless at close range
you decided to play rating with a t7 tank
@sonic sedge terrain is split in two parts - soft terrain and hard terrain. Only soft terrain slows you down and soft terrain is only water. If you are on hard terrain like sand or dirt the speed is unaffected. So this shows you have no idea what you are talking about yet again.
Seriously u playing helsing and still complaining
I was complaining about the overall match up,NOT using the helsing đ
I thought you were complaining about not being able to pen or 1v1 a tier 8 heavy (even though you could)
Try getting a bit of consistency in your complaints and maybe people will take them seriously đ¤ˇ
@sonic sedge
err I never mentioned I was using the helsing, others did!
"DPM with a helsing that isnât that fast & wonât pen either of those heavies from the front without being destroyed 1st..you try it!"
Then:
"top speed of 60kmh but not on sand..Also you expect a tier 7 to go head to head with a heavily armoured harder hitting tier 8? yeah brilliant logic"
Loving how you didnt mention the helsing at all there đ¤Ś
Also no matter the ground your gonna reach your max speed this ainât warthunder here đ
@ornate spoke unless he is in water. That is the only time
T95 always reaches top speed anywhere because you won't notice if you stop moving because it's T95
- Tog cries in the corner *