#vehicles-discussion
1 messages Ā· Page 331 of 1
Yeah avoid that š
Lowe still has big brothers
Maus is a bullyš
Mauschen isn't a bully if you have teammates to keep him from pushing, it's a bit easier to hide the weakspots of a Lowe than a Mauschen
Thats kinda hard when the team is scared of a wt hitting them
Must be player error being that far up knowing the waffle is there
Lion vs shark
Many players would opt for the Shark because it's new and most players are not sure how to counter it effectively, but the Lion is still a competitor >:)
Technically it's better and worse in the hulldown department
Well sharky doesnt seem that scary
Not to me, sure it's a great enemy to fight hulldown but not scary
If you're consistently on it then you'd trade almost 620 for it's 545, even less for HE xD
But why the He tho its blinding
They have no choice probably
Well imma sleep ty again for the very help full lessons
Np
can we have a buff for KV 2 :(
Nah, it's capable
Would it ever be possible to buy the common camouflage with gold, to run with real camouflage on a tank?
The what?
hmm... kv1s vs thunder. any difference in their performance?
Thunder has a slightly worse dpm and reload but has better armour by 10mm on the turret and 25mm on the hull@solid gate
I wish I could make my own camo
Give leopard1 -10gun depression :(
Hard to peek when there's an stb1 against you
Dont go against stb1 in hulldown then,flank around
give leo -12 to make it the ultimate flex tank
@solid gate @tulip sail Thunder is a better KV-1S you trade a small amount of mobility for better armour and 2 more depression.
A .02 longer reload isnāt even worth talking about.
that is not small amount for a heavy tank , they have different elevation too, they are different
Thunder is over all a better tank
Itās just a better kv is, end of discussion lol
Jg pz E100 it a good tank? I like this tank because: Good gun, it Germany, Have a good amor and it huge
It is good, you need a team, but itās a solid tank over all
Ow ok
can hold it is own if you wont get circled
can hold it is own if you wont get circled
@haughty forge
I like anti-tanks , because it easy to play with this tanks, i just camp and i say ahhaha in global chat
Buff amx 30b
Buff amx 30b
@mortal echo
High explosive and boom
Buff armor T-2020
has the T28 proto always had this weakspot? feel like i've never seen it before until now
Dont go against stb1 in hulldown then,flank around
@open solstice
Not easy to play against stb1 or 62a especially when I'm the only medium in ratings team. Also kinda get rekt by vickers when hulldown.
True but you don't have much options in that case,either be stealth sniper or try spotting for team with lot of risk if you don't want to lose hp
@sturdy bane It's always been there, and it used to be weaker IIRC
Well can u give the Sheridan the same gun in world of tanks so we don't have to keep being missled all the time
The mechanic itself remains kind of broken but missiles are no longer as good as they used to be. Once you catch a Sheridan in cqc heās likely to lose, as the dpm is really low. It also got a mobility nerf a while ago, making it way harder to run away from mediums.
Are we allowed to put custom camos in the game?
I've always wanted to make my Maus Pink lol
Are we allowed to put custom camos in the game?
@rotund palm
Legally, No, you violate WG EULA for modifying their content
Practically, as long the mods didn't give you advantage in-game or cosmetic-mods only (Custom camo mods included), It's allowed (Ref : http://forum.wotblitz.com/index.php?/topic/31847-mods-in-blitz/)
MODS in Blitz - posted in Current Archive : So lets talk mods.Ā We have decided to follow the WoT PC example and allow certain mods while prohibiting others. Some mods are there to enhance theĀ gameplay experience. Something like sound modsĀ or a new sixth sense icon can add a ne...
Theres a protest in #737315852650676361
So I'm allowed to make my Maus Pink? Since i only use Maus for training rooms
So I'm allowed to make my Maus Pink? Since i only use Maus for training rooms
If that the case. yeah, it's fine
Why do i keep seeing sheridans with custom camos Saying You're Gay
Itās a mod.
I want them Sheridan Camo mod
anyone know if i should get the type 59 ding?
Technically missiles have a curved path in the air so when you shoot one itās not straight
Imma start to make my Maus pink
anyone know when the Centurion 5/1 will come?
Expect 3-4 updates probably.
It will probably be overcooked at the very least, unless they massively nerf it before release
which one better in term of concealment?
Batchat or Vickers?
Vickers has slightly better camo after shot, otherwise they seem roughly equal
Does E100 have any Custom camo
No idea. It has an official (not a mod) legendary camo.
@hollow belfryćI see and thxćI just shot E75 from 235m away in batchatćand I was spotted š¤
Did you shoot him? Were you using a bush or not?
I'm in open areaćI will give you my screenshot
E100 does have Historical Skin but not available for android ;-;
E100 cant have historical camo bc e100 wasnt realš
But Maus can have GuP skin
Letās say « wannabe historical paint schemeĀ Ā», that looks more or less realistic.
Probably
Imma just buy E100 Legendary Camo
E100 should have a custom camo saying in the sides The British Scrapped me!
@keen otter E75 can have a view range of around 280m if using provisions and the binoculars equipment.
You said you were in an open area, so not behind a bush or anything? You lose the majority of your camo rating when you shoot.
@tulip edge
when I shot at 220-235m I spottedćthen I reset my concealment and E75 reversing then I shot him again at 240m (unspotted)
š¤ š¤ š¤
Is Lowe better than M6 Exp ?
Is Lowe better than M6 Exp ?
credit coefficient? ABSOLUTELY
Performance? Well... i'd say they have different playstyle, so it's hard to compare
Lowe is better at making credit thanks for the info cause i wasted 9 mil creds when gravity force was still here
Wasted 9 Mil because i tried to rush TDs to see if Maus can Fly
Hi why i dont play level 7 reyting battle?
Ratings are closed i think
I waiting 10 minuties
Now Eu server open reyting but i choose 7 level tank waiting 10 minutes dont play
We're in different servers thought but i think not many players are playing tier 7 and Tier 8
Not many players play tier 7 or tier 8 but if it was tier 10 it would be easy to find a match
Playing tier 7 in ratings isnāt ideal, and it creates longer queue times for you if you try to play tier 7
are the Type 59 Twins good or nah
what?
Which gun would you guys prefer,t62a or leopard 1?
leopard 1
Lets talk about what if Deathstar gone from Blitz? Somebody once told that probably Super Tortoise with huge chunk and thick frontal armor or random WG ideas about fictional tanks will show up replacing it on British TD line
As for i am, '89 Chimera probably my best bet- (maybe without spaced armor for balance, idk)
You'll get that feeling of driving a T95 with mobility i suppose... š¤
Wargaming did not announce any replacement of the 183 in the near future, but the suggestion above makes sense.
I just love this British TD concept irl, probably one of the best afaik for turretless TD unlike JagdChieftain lol
If they ever removed the deathstar, I wouldnāt be surprised if the Turtle came into play from PC.
But deathstar will remain where it is for the time being
I would enjoy seeing this tank in the game nevertheless, and maybe give a worthy reason to grind the AT line @alpine notch
@tulip edge Turtle Mk. 1? Not really that OP though, but still tough opponent to face on corners (frontally)
@hollow belfry š
Or is there another Turtle TD's that i dont know about?
Im sure they would balance it accordingly on blitz, and it would make a lot of sense to have it there.
It would be better on Blitz anyway with the smaller maps
And yes Iām talking about the Turtle. Only one
I'll be surprised if that Turtle Mk. 1 came as tech tree tank replacing Tortoise on tier IX, and Tortoise goes on tier X replacing Deathstar.
But who knows-
Ultimately its up to them, and we are just throwing ideas around. All we know is that the deathstar is here to stay for the time being, if not forever
Looks like we have to wait- we'll see about that hopefully in future...
ngl I thought vickers light speed got nerfed then I remembered that the last time I played it was in gravity š
is LTTb good tank
lttb is amazing
Use the second gun it has depression
use the third gun, it has dpm
Third gun makes the tank look cooler tho
third gun is best
Next on Yukon men
im having fun with it, its just.....use the speed effectively dont just go whipping round cuz you can....if you can team up with another speedy boy that helps...but i really found its great for getting quick flanks on unsuspecting enemies....and winning 1v1s against heavies if you push faster than their turrents can rotate....also yah that extra bit of depression helps a lot (2nd gun) but then for sure use gun rammer
Yeah I like LTTB, especially for gravity lmao.
Bonus that is has well sloped armour, so you will always get that troll bounce, mostly from lower tiers
or higher tiers tooo
Occasionally, but it mainly allows you to bully the lower tier lights and mediums
idk about u but i bounce from t8 tds than any other tanks
i cant believe some of the bounces i've had on that thing, like, i should have been dead sort of bounces
I need an accurate armor inspector for the grille. That thing has the weirdest armor I've seen.
How to play tiger 2
You play it like a tiger 2 š
Bully meds, play smart vs heavies. Donāt count on your armor, itās not OP vs anything with decent pen or aim. Wiggle the turret a bit. @zinc grove
Thank you
ok guys so how to play p43 bis
Out trade meds, wiggle the turret and angle the upper plate
What is a good T10 tank with mobility and good armor
Wot whit sdkfz š¤
@smoky narwhal which tank type
how to use MT25
Clip and dip
what do you mean
Obj. 140 or T-62A?@smoky narwhal
You are a light tank so spot early, get in shots if you can but try not to take shots. When you know where tanks are, flank around to find an isolated or distracted target, dump the clip, and get into cover @hallow thistle
Affirmative!
MT-25. I havenāt played it in a while, but I sure had fun driving that thing
Same , i did full platoon with mt 25
Mauschen, I got it but never actually played it. Thought ferdi would give me top gun but shared research in blitz is non-existent even though the ferdi top gun and mauschen is the same gun but just with āPAKā instead of āKWKā, is it and the maus worth it? I know itās a great side scraper but is the line worth finishing or should I sell?
um, if the guns names are different that means both guns aren't the same
just because they share the same cal doesn't mean they are both the same gun
and shared research exists in Blitz look at IS7 and IS4 lines @solid gate
@solid gate It is worth finishing, Maus is a top performer at tier ten especially after the heavy HP buffs.
If you want to become proficient with the maus, you have to practice with angling the hull and turret, and doing a bit of wiggling.
Mauschen is a pos. Maus is a god
Donāt need to have someone freak out whenever a spammer comes along, and this would be better in #off-topic-discussion
Jadgtiger. is it like itās Prem 105mm cousin? I like to frontline the 8.8 in a hulldown showing the main superstructure with great results and many steel wall awards. But is the tech tree jadgtiger like this? I am at the ferdi and need the XP to get the vehicle itself. Is it a frontliner or a sniper? I already know that itās a great tank but I just need to know what to do once I have it.
@solid gate Jagdtiger has a better gun and more armor than the prem. It is a very strong tank. I imagine it has a similar playstyle.
@gentle wasp Alright, but when I was playing similar tanks like the T95 I saw the jadgtiger having an easy to pen frontal plate even without pramo. So I wonder if the armor can hold up from the front with things like meds/non ATGM lights?
lol you are shooting at it with a t95
a high pen td of course it is gonna pen
the upper plate is good but it is not gonna hold itself against high pen tanks
so you need to hulldown in it
however the upper plate holds itself against meds and lights
until they load prammo
@solid gate the upper plate is pretty nice against most meds. Donāt rely on it against higher pen tanks, try to go hull down
Yeah, usually I consider myself out of position if my frontal plate is showing with the 8.8 most of the time
Same thing is true for the Jagdtiger.
if you go hulldown and somewhat angle the front plate of the jagtiger it becomes strong enough to bounce a lot of shots
Then the main problem would be your side armor.
The sides arenāt too paper, as long as you take a conservative angle you should be fine
ping
Itās HE literally barely rolls any higher then itās standard ammo, thereās almost no point to it
Just give it HE damage, we don't need anymore missle tanks in the game
If you want historical accuracy, just go play another game really. Secondly, we certainly do NOT need any more ATGM tanks added into the game. 2 made enough of a [censored]storm
Ok, but hereās the thing: Sheridan and T92 are OP because of missile PLUS speed and armor/spaced armor. Kpz lacks the speed and armor, even the turret is pennable with any decent gun
T92 has no longer any good armor wdym
It already has deplorable alphas, armor, reload, and pen. If they arenāt willing to give it normal HE, then replace itās nigh useless HEAT with ATGM
Admiral bro pass what ever you are high on because T92 absolutely has way too much armor for what it is.
That upper plate is ridiculous and everyone knows it, thatās why more people stay at tier 9 with T92 than go to tier 10 for Sheridan
The only thing KPF 70 could need is 780 HE alpha
The upper plate is 87mm... sure you can get troll bounces off it but the same can be said for pretty much every tank
The only way to balance T92 is to give it wotpc-levels of light tank armor, meaning 10-30mm
Anyways, back to kpz, it lacks is the speed so the missiles wonāt be super OP on it, just a balance/selling point
« it has way too much armor for what it is » literally can be HEd from the front
That upper plate tho, same with fa- I mean progetto but yāall arenāt ready for that discussion
Progetto has nearly twice as much armor there. Next.
^
.
different angle makes it more effective
bruh pretty sure 40>50
Then who said T92 has 87mm
Effective
look, Leopard 1 has 72mm frontal, but tier 2s canāt pen it
You are talking about the T92ās armor like if it had not been nerfed since itās release
Wait hold on I have another question
Straight on it has 87mm effective armor on the front plate. 40 is the base value.
Do you know about auto bounce angle/ overmatching? Which one dominates the other?
There are probably some excellent forum posts by people that are much more familiar with this than me.
Iām just curios, because by the rule of overmatching my E100 should ALWAYS pen progetto/T92 100% of the time, but somehow it doesnāt
Are there any devs sober enough to answer or all you guys too busy doing happy dust on more crate tank ideas
How do armor penetration mechanics work?
What is the difference between shell types?
Which shell type should you use, depending on the circumstance?
When do you hear āCritical hit!ā without inflicting any damage?
This episode of Explaining Mechanics will answer these and ot...
hello tankers not many people know about the armor characteristics of tanks the caliber rules and other little tidbits to help you along the way. I'm going to explain everything I can on armor penetration to help you out on the battlefield.
Send me clips Burningpeak30@gmail.com
I know how the 2 rules work, what I donāt get is which overrules the other
is the Is-4 good or is the Is-7 better?
Unless of course they made a mistake and armor inspector isnāt up to date with the progetto .
Probably is4 is better
IS-4 is light years better, I regret getting the IS-7, you trade speed for better armour profile
@smoky narwhal no, but the ammorack location is
oh okay, is the pike nose really that bad?
Is7 lacks the super weak spot at the bottom sides that the IS-4 has
If you suggest missiles on KPZ chances are you donāt know how kpz works
Man I have the kpz and Iāve aced it several times, I know what itās like. To how I know it needs buffs. The only reason I suggested ATGMs is for historical accuracy. Iād be happy with almost literally any other decent buff
is the SU-100 good for spotting?
No
like not even one bit?
i mean that makes sense cuz i can't see anything lol
Right now I drive the vk100.01, I like its armor, however I really want to find a tank with better mobility
Then your playing the wrong tech line if u want mobility XD
@faint solstice if so, the T-62A should get ATGMs, it had a smoothbore that could fire ATGMs
@faint solstice You can still bounce/not pen from overmatched plates if the effective armour is still more than your normalized penetration. Thus you are able to bounce from the Progetto or T92 at extreme angles even with bigger calibre.
Iāve aced it much more times than 7 should also point out the only reason the atgms work on the t92 and Sheridan is that they have the flexibility to properly use them
No T62 doesnāt need any more buffs. Kpz NEEDS some kind of buff
The KPZ is underpowered it is true but itās still a middle ground between the T9 heavies and second of all if all the other T9 heavies are available why donāt you play them instead
Kpz has terrible pen, armor, alpha, and reload, even itās 152mm HE barely rolls higher than its standard ammo
Kpz needs the buffs badly, maybe ATGMs would be overkill, but atleast give it regular HE alpha numbers(itās max is only 800)
First off T62 doesnt have access to ATGMS that wasnāt available until T64
it was.
ah wait, crap, got mixed between the 64 and 62
Lol, all good
Anyways, back to kpz, ok so maybe not ATGMs (which is why it had a 152mm in the first place), but atleast give it regular Alpha numbers: 640,560,960
also remembered the 64 had an autoloader
My advice just give up on attempting to get a buff for the KPZ it wont happen wargaming has already forgot the thing exists and has no plans to change it should also note i sold mine many months ago
And if not regular alpha numbers, then just itās HE then, because right now itās max roll on HE is only 800 which is the max roll the SU series have kn AP which just isnāt fair
@solid gate why would you sell a premium tank of all things
Because u can sell kpz for like 3 million credits
One it didnt even make good money two i have better ones available and despised the kpz and didnt want it anymore
Sorry but you are wrong, kpz makes tons of credits if u get even semi decent games. Iāve literally never lost credits in a game with it
I would make 20-30k on a good game in it
Mb, I forgot I have premium
Plus I can get it back at anytime with restoration I have the creds to do so
good point, Iāll withdraw my case
Ye me too, but itās nice to run 2 games it and recover from buying a new tank
Hey dog, what do u have to do to get the veteran role?
25k battles 50% WR
So itās not actually being a veteran of the game... bruh
I mean, 6 years and one battle is hardly a veteran to me
Yeah, but 6 years and almost 14k battles should be a veteran (I took a long brake)
X
14k isn't a lot
Well I got it all in under a year so
evolution of american tanks how nice
Couldnt find the german one sadly
That seems like string for #blitz-memes , maybe not quite vehicle discussion
On second thought I guess it kinda does
really interesting how tank doctrine changes from being simple battering rams made to support the infantry to their own separate units on the battlefield
I've been penned through my tracks even though i sidescraped at least 80 degrees. is that cuz SU-100 side armor is overmatched?
Speaking of doctrine, I believe there should be a 5th tank type in blitz(not artillery)
American tanks came a very long way from crappy shermans to one of the strongest tanks around
The kp looks like a rhino tbh
@faint solstice what would that be
Wheel tanks?
5th tank type concept: assault guns
Includes things like:
T95
Every T28 variant
JG.E100
Elephant(Ferdinand)
Foch/foch 155
Obj.263
U get the idea
@storm apex you can't sidescrape in every vehicle
welp. that explains it
Even leopard 1?
Tortoise
T110E3/4
Oh yeah donāt side scrape in leo XD.
Anyways what do you think about my concept? The idea is to have a 5th tank type to discourage people camping in tanks classified as TDs, but have heavy armor and should be up front
In fact the entire upper British TD line except for fv183 should be classified as assault guns
@plush bobcat and British tanks went from a childās drawings to mathematically calculating the best angles to help reduce weight and increase armour
Most "tank Destroyers" were SPGs or Assault tanks, I don't think it's necessary.
Assault tanks have mostly second line support capabilities
yeah, too far in and they get murked
No, because something like an fv4005 should not be an assault gun/SPG, and the fv183 was historically made to be a tank destroyer to combat ever modernizing soviet tanks
the FV183 was never made, the 4005 was
183 had a wooden mock up
But the fv4005 was made with the 183mm gun
And the devs here donāt have the balls to give us the fv183(with armor from pc) or the fv4005 also from pc. Or maybe they do have the balls but they are just passed out from happy dust
No because they canāt stand the outrage from the 183
no, the FV 4005 is just better than the 183 even if the 4005 had the 183
The 183 has been removed from the tech tree in PC.
Itās funny how tiers 5-9 have armor but suddenly āhey remember the alecto? Yeah all that time you spent with armor was for nothing, hereās the 183ā
even when it was part of the line, the armour wasnāt all good
ThE ArMoR WaSnT AlL ThAt GoOd
Man just pass what ever your smoking, i want sum
The 183 we have no blitz has literally nothing in common with the entire tech line except for the tier 4, it should have more relatable armor
you assumed that people used standard ammo, right? No one on PC used standard ammo lol
Bruh literally 3 tanks can pen that angle, THREE
Iām gonna guess you havenāt ever read any patch notes on the 183s long history of nerfs in blitz
403 is too much for all types of ammo except for the Jg Pz E100 HEAT
Yeah thereās obj268 and that one Rus- I mean Chinese TD
plus, thatās one specific part of the armour, aim up a bit more, voilla, pen
Not quite
The 183 has no place in blitz both sides despise it thereās no way to balance it the past of it was far more annoying and deserved the nerfs it got
Give me 10 minutes to tweak the stats I could balance the sh1t out of it
Good thing you canāt
You could give it the worst armor or speed or accuracy you canāt get rid of that gun
Yes, god forbid a sober person of sound mind have a chance to work on this game
The 268 and the 113G FT can only pen it if it high rolls on the pen
@faint solstice thatās not even on the same armour plate
They did and you know what they suggested to remove the tank from the tech tree
Yeh I know, Iām factoring a decent player driving it
You see a decent player wouldnt drive it in the first place
^
^
Then boom ,you have a nice nich tank that isnāt overused because people think itās bad
the 4005 on PC is just way better, why play the worse tank
Because it would be nice to have armor that resembles the entire tech line
No you get the opposite itās a tank that has no place on either side someone will get hit for all their health and the enemy 183 gets deleted instantly or either misses its a lose lose for both teams
thatās why the badger was implemented as a replacement
Wait, badger isnāt a premium on pc?
Itās a tech tree...
Yo wtf... nvm I forgot artys
Anyways, as I said, give me 10 minutes and I can give you a balanced nich tank that isnāt OP and isnāt useless(like it is now)
I could literally come up with a balanced T64 to add to blitz
No you couldnt without ruining the point of the tank to fit in the game to a tier it doesnāt belong to
bet
oh god an autoloader with RUSSIAN BIAS and ATGM CAPABILITY
One word of T64 APFSDS
Ye no ATGMs, I know how to balance it in a way that would make it ok even for blitz
Too bad the devs are too busy making for random tier 7 premiums and tier 8 crate tanks
it has an autoloader dude, and Iām pretty sure it has ERA too
It doesnāt matter if it has an autoloader other tanks do you know the problem is it uses an ammo that has many complex properties that canāt be properly adapted in a game like WOT also not factoring in the T64 has a resistant and complex armor lay out for the game making it resistant to HEAT and APCR and smaller AP rounds
But hereās the concept:
Nigh unpennabke turret(like wz111-5a)
Yes, APFSDS(380 pen, 2k mps, 15k credits each) main selling point
Deplorable maunuverability(like kpz, but worse engine power)
In place of ERA have great spaced armor(like super conq)
Give it same alpha as 128mm/130mm guns (460 standard, 340 premium, 560 HE)
Terrible side armor (like all MBTs)
Instead of gun rammer, it has vents(like an auto loader, but no drums/clips)
10 second reload(unrealistic, for balacing)
NO ATGMs(balance)
Standard pen 320-330
Turret traverse slightly faster than kpz, but not by much
@lyric copper you do realize super conq has āERAā that is just thicc spaced armor
320 standard pen bro thatās as good as some TDs
Itās a 125mm gun, itās gonna be good, no way around that part
So not only is it slower than a KPZ it has broken penetration impennable turret and a complex round who would want this itās just a 60 TP but worse
Maybe less, 300-310 standard 340-355 premium
so itās practically a better T-62a
Basically, but a lot less maunverable
Itās a T62A with broken pen mediocre DPM no speed and no gun depression
Ye, I forgot to say, 5 gun depression for balancing, I think it had 6 irl
So thereās literally no point in using it
There is
APFSDS will go very fast, as itās supposed to
It has the same pen as premium 120mm/122mm guns, but will be the fastes round in the game.
Btw you guys do know APFSDS is already in the game, right?
Itās only on one tank, but itās the single fastest round in the game rn
APFSDS does more than you think but you still ignore 310-380 pen is average for TDs that still have trouble penning some other tanks combine that with only 5 gun dep and terrible speeds you make the most pointless thing yet also APFSDS is in the game but itās classed as APCR on the chieftain
Anyways maybe 2k mps is too fast, maybe more like 1700 or 1800
And ammo prices havenāt done anything to stop a tank or ammo from being spammed itās tier 10 your not there to make credits
Thatās called balancing
Bad hull, good turret
Bad gun hadniling, high alpha
Bad aim time, high velocity
Itās another super conq or IS clone
Wdym IS clone
The entire point is to have very niche and specific advantages, but also have exploitable disadvantages, THATS THE BALANCE
Good turret mediocre gun handling high alpha on some of the tanks ok aim time high velocity thatās not balance it provided no diversity over any other T10 heavy
Also ATGMS are what, like 4K? firing a few APFSDS across a few games will leave anyone without loads of credits broke
make em 5k
Who cares about profits at tier 10?
Itās not about profit, they will be so expensive if ur not careful you could literally loose near 100k in a game if u spam and arent a decent shot
Also give it low max ammo, like only 35 shots total
no one cares about credits at t10. you donāt play it for money, but for performance.
The performance would depend on whoās playing it
If u try to rush out thinking ur invincible your gonna have a rude awakening. If you go hull down you will become a imovable object
Yet you canāt go hulldown with 5 gun dep
You can the right places
Very specific and selectable places of which barely can provide any use and are highly situational
But thatās the balance! Itās not easy to use, it will be a difficult tank to really be OP in, thatās the point
EXACTLY, Iām not trying to make the be all end all tank, im trying to make a tank with advantages and disadvantages, thatās the entire point
The point was to balance it but it provides nothing unique you literally pulled a kpz 70 on it
^
Are you not listening? Kpz has pennable turret, T64 would not (Minus a hatch), T64 has the apfsds with 350-360 pen at 1700 mps
Your not listening you ignored my statement of putting a tank in a tier it doesnāt fit in and tweaking it fit when it becomes worse than its peers
It has ups and downs, kpz just has downs and downs
Yet you were complaining to buff kpz earlier...
Your statement is that it has nothing unique, yes? Iām saying it does have things that are unique. Yes, kpz still needs buffs
Iām not going to waste my time trying to argue with that person.
Im confused what im reading.
He went full circle
How? By standing by an earlier statement? Back to T64, Iām not ignoring your statement
You literally complained about kpz not being good at anything earlier and wanting to buff it and tried to say the 183 could be balanced to fit and then tried to say T64 could be balanced to fit in tier 10 when you literally did the same thing WG did to the kpz 70
By what, giving it bad stats..
Kpz has bad stats with no advantages, 0, nada, nothing. T64 would have some bad stats with other advantages, thatās how tanks like that are supposed to work
Atleast the 183 has something which is its alpha, kpz has nothing
How about no T64 and just some slight buffs to the kpz ĀÆ_(ć)_/ĀÆ Kpz isnt a bad tank
What advantages does it have pen? How much times must I remind you 5 gun dep makes that useless combined with bad handling the front hull armor is useless when it also has bad speed
Oh my god, thats the point, you canāt play it however you want
Dog is telling you it cant be used to good affect.
You can only play it in specific ways, but those specific ways, when done right, are devastating, thatās the entire point. Itās not going to be flexible, itās not supposed to
From what I read its basically a godly turret but it has barely any depression so the turret is useless.
You know the new yukon map? There are places where in pennable turrets and 5 gun depression would still work wonders
You mean the valley in the waterfall or the brawling zone near the wood works
Im NOT saying this tank should be built for Yukon alone, Iām just using Yukon as an example
But thatās the point, the tank has balancing factors that prevent it from being flexible. It will lose a lot, it likely wonāt do well in most players hands. But any decent player that can work the turret will do great
Play itās advantages, if your against it then try to play off its disadvantages, thatās the whole point
T49 needs a minor concealment nerf
Iām gonna stop wasting my time here you need to seriously get back in the game if you think 5 gun dep is workable
Ok then, letās hypothetically give it 6
Also you do know that is3 has 5 gun depression right? And people still make that work
because most of the time it goes to the city, where it is flat
Yes, and work the tiny tiny slopes
6 degrees feels like a bit too much for that tank if itās gonna have a great turret, but ok then letās say it has 6
I feel like dog just wants a scaled up current T62A
isnāt that what the T-64 is?
NO, atleast not in my concept
It is/was irl, but this is different. Obviously MBT isnāt a tank type so it would be classified as a heavy tank, and would have stats that reflect that
MBT is a type of tank
Yes, but not in blitz, Iām saying if it was in blitz
WTH is going on...?
We are argu- discussing the idea of a Balanced T64 being in blitz
Blitz already has enough MBT's
Dogwisdom kept trying to twist it into something OP, Iām trying to make a balanced concept
Bruh blitz only has 2 high tier MBTs and only one of them is good
Uh... are you asking to get the Obj 430 into Blitz?
Read the top 20-30 messages about balancing ideas
T-62A, Leopard 1 and AMX 30B, Chieftain, KPF 70
premium MBTs also I donāt call tier 8 top tier
Centurions as well (and STB I believe)
Centurions are part of a very specific tank type invented by the british
Which is the mbt
All i see is request to get the Obj 430(U) from PC to Blitz...
I remember bc they all start with a C. Nono not MBT, thereās a reason basically all british tanks start with a C
yeah STB counts, but Centi isnāt, but is argued as being one of the first āMBTsā as the British Army used them in general purpose roles
T-62A, Leopard 1 and AMX 30B, Chieftain, KPF 70
Dont forget M60 and m48
Kuro your looking at it like dogwisdom did, the entire point is for there to be balances
M48 isnāt counted, M60 is
First line from tank encyclopedia āThe Centurion was simultaneously the last of the cruiser type and the first main battle tank.ā
But hereās the concept:
Nigh unpennabke turret(like wz111-5a)
Yes, APFSDS(380 pen, 2k mps, 15k credits each) main selling point
Deplorable maunuverability(like kpz, but worse engine power)
In place of ERA have great spaced armor(like super conq)
Give it same alpha as 128mm/130mm guns (460 standard, 340 premium, 560 HE)
Terrible side armor (like all MBTs)
Instead of gun rammer, it has vents(like an auto loader, but no drums/clips)
10 second reload(unrealistic, for balacing)
NO ATGMs(balance)
Standard pen 320-330
Turret traverse slightly faster than kpz, but not by much
I say m48 bc it was a m60 prototype, so its essentially a MBT
But the T-64 in prototype form is Obj 430 which existed in PC...
Ok what I meant was premium MBTs classified as heavies
so then wouldnāt the Panther be an MBT? Good armour, gun and manoeuvrability?
No
what makes it not an MBT?
MBT is the design. MBTs are made to be universal vehicles
Panther was made with only the German army in mind
MBT is about rolling all tank roles into one
Heavy armor, big gun, good mobility, 75mm isnāt a big gun
the only thing it was bad at was crew co-ordination and cross country driving (150km final drives LOL)
The 75mm it was armed with could punch through most allied armour at long distances
We are getting way off tracks
Back to T64, the entire idea is to have a tank with overall bad stats, but have some good qualities that make it worth buying and playing
I don't get why you are trying to balance for something which technically existed in game form on another platform with different environment...
Of it existed why canāt I find it on armor inspector?
Nvm
Stop trying to turn blitz into war thunder
itās PC
I was looking under heavy tanks
It's called the Obj 430 and Obj 430U on PC. That's literally the T-64 you are harping about (it's a medium)
Yeah my bad, I was looking under heavies. Iām not trying to turn blitz into warthunder, there are a billion things that would have to change to even make it close. Adding one tank would not turn the game into warthunder
It's like asking to add the Japanese MBT Type 74. We have it! It's in Protoype form called the STB-1
So, T64: the idea is to have a tank with mostly bad hull armor, nigh unpennable turret (minus hatch), bad gun handling, exclusive APFSDS(350-360pen, 1700mps), 5 or 6 degrees of depression for balancing, bad maneuverability for balencing
Obj 430 and Obj 430U are literally the T-64 in prototype form. Just on PC platform with different gamestyle. Request for that and maybe you might get a chance. Up to the dev on adding that thing
Basically a Russian super conq, but with APFSDS and worse gun depression
So you think Iād have a higher chance of getting a balanced T64 in the game than a buff for the kpz XD
Higher, still not 1% chance
Lmfao I bet devs donāt even read this chat, I bet every day there are so many ideas in this channel that could make them so much money, but they just donāt read it XD
M48 was not a prototype
Yes, it was a predecessor
That is not the same as prototype. And the Object 430 was not the prototype of the T-64
We are confusing the words prototype and predecessor
Btw now that Iām look at it, yes, basically the obj430U in blitz, but with APFSDS and even worse maneuverability
So it can reasonably be classified as a heavy
Predecessor: tank in succeeding lineage. M46 Patton -> M48 Patton
Prototype: first physical iteration of a tank for battle trial and effectiveness. T1 Heavy -> M6 Heavy
^^^Yes^^^
430 was another tank project that had nothing to do with the development of the T-64
Ok but the play styles and concepts in game would be similar, good upper plate, bad lower and side armor, amazing turret, bad gun handling, good alpha and pen, very specific playstyle, bad tank for most played but good for experienced players
And of course, NO ATGM, but yes to the APFSDS with great pen and velocity, but itās balanced by bad overall gun handling
...Object 430 developed with design to succeed the T-54 medium in service. Modification during testing were made, converting the name to Object 432. Once completed trial and approve for service, the designation T-64 was given...
O.o
Object 432 was based on the Object 430 but it was not actually the same project
I guess it was inspired?
So what, add the T-64/Object 432 because they are direct connections where the Object 430 which is where the whole thing start off with is pointless to oblivion...k
I guess we should remove the Object 140, even though it is in the history for the T-62 development...
No, the Object 430 was kind of bad but they made a study (the Object 430U (or enhanced)) and found that they could convert it to a heavy, so they decided to start a new project based on that
I never said that, I just want to clear up how these tanks are actually connected
Then what about Object 165?
What about it?
Who misses the grind on gravity :(
If the Object 430 is not related to the T-64, then what about the Object 140 to the Object 165
I did not say that they are not related. Quite contrarily, I made it very clear that one is based on the other
Oh wait, now I see my message. That was non-sense
Screw it. I give up. Just give the dunce hat and say I'm a history idiot. Clearly I'm stupid
I said that the Object 430 has nothing to do with the development of the T-64. That is obviously incorrect, it is just not the project/ prototype
Without it the fundamental of T-64 will also doesn't exist. Technically it's a prototype base on the logic Standard B is a Leopard 1 prototype (wildly different design and the PTA is a whole other project but it is technically a prototype)
Well, they were all prototypes for the same competition and not consecutive
I mean, some people say that the MBT 70 is a prototype for the Abrams and the Leopard 2 which isnāt really correct
Maybe it's just my definition of prototype since its broad and will consider tank that lead nowhere as part of a prototype (iteration). Not a direct relation, but without it the modern vehicles won't exist unless that plan either encountered or by accident land on the perfect mark
Their role in tank development, especially during the Cold War, shouldnāt be underestimated
Many of the different designs were more studies for future tanks with little hope to be adopted themselves
If it's just a development from is good enough. Maybe the hull suck but the turret is great, so take the turret and make a new hull to comply with a new guideline. Then again, there are Bradley design some wouldn't consider as its prototype and got scrap but it did help lead to the prototype.
Or maybe I'm just stupid and should've use concepts over prototype but that opens to the nuclear tank which did made the US favor egg shell designs even if it is not physically shared anything...
The nuclear tank is an oddity
It's a useless concept, but it did made American think egg shell protection for some time
They stopped doing it pretty quickly though. Probably because it was not worth the effort
Hazard a guess the driver on turret idea. That might explain why a certain arty has that concept implemented
The TV-8 didnāt introduce the egg shell design
Driver in turret? Which one if I may ask?
Chieftain covered it sometime ago, forgot the name of it. Based of a Patton hull (M48 from my crappy memory)
Right, M53 & M55, still dont remember which Patton hull that is
M47, I looked it up. But it is not exactly the M47 Patton hull because they reversed the driving aspects
M103 test prototype is T43... I swear the US and Russia are more similar than they want to admit...
Left side of the hull, up the turret, under the turret ring, and a big rack on front hull on the right
Is it just me or is the panther 2 feel underpowered
Itās solid now
Itās not too good
Thatās what i thought :/
Sigh smasher and its hesh depresses me
Smasher doesnāt have HESH...
tier 9 Foch is an Mbt, change my mind
I call he hesh idk why but high explosive
I wish I started playing the charioteer sooner I was dreading using it since how many people I've heard say its bad
its not bad but its not good, tor, tor is just in a bad spot, glass cannon that has no speed, and armor that dosent work
I've been doing really good in it playing as a medium
Well not really good (only 1900 average dmg)
tbh tour needs an armor buff cause without being able to use armor its useless, and with jags buff last patch, they really just dug the hole that tor was in even deeper.
Wait where did the tortoise come from?
ĀÆ\_(ć)_/ĀÆ
Iām on the Sherman firefly and Iām using it as a sniper to practice the other tanks in the line.
the history behind the tor is, after the d-day landing as the allies were advancing through mid Europe, they were having issues with more and more fortified positions. With this the project to develop a heavy, assault gun platform, they started with the excelsior, it wasn't standing up against the long 75mm Pak 40's and 8.8cm flak guns. Thus they said "enough of this reusing stuff, lets just develop a new vehicle."
and we play through those from tier 5-9 with the next being heavier and even more armored. Until they developed the AT-16 = a39 tortoise. The tortoise was approved and was going to be shipped to Germany by september of 1945.
25 were going to be made, but the war ended so the order was reduced down, and only 6 were made.
It went through even more testing in Germany after the war, and it was found that it was extremally reliable in terms of mechanics, and a powerful accurate gun platform.
@tulip sail
That's not what I ment I was talking about the charioteer then you started replying about the tort I'm familiar with its development
ah, the charioteer is kinda in the same boat other then it was a prototype vehicle made to replace old britsh m10's fitted with the 17-pounder, ummm i believe it was between the challenger and charioteer to see which would replace it.
That or it was made to replace the challenger as it came off the production line, considering how the 84mm that was fited in the challenger would do much to the late Is-2 and Is-3's or to what then became of the early t-54 models. Being completely ineffective to deal with those vehicle's
@tulip sail
I really want to get the Wz 121 but i am on T 34 2
use the 122mm, and the 121 is worth it
Is the infinity g37 coupe a good car to consider purchasing? Need feedback
Uh... Not the vehicle i expect but I heard it is fun to drive but maintenance is a bit of a nightmare
@quick thicket Iām driving a 2003 g35 and it still runs great, depends if it was taken car of
Just dont get a ford explorer
I learned that the SU-100 was not a rammer the hard way š
Su-100 is an easy ammo rack, take out a KV-1S and aim below the gun
Why in god's name does the ISU 152 have like 0 hitpoints
BL-10 is amazing, dont get me wrong, but survivability, meh
the entire point of the tank is the gun
Yes give a tank that has a better gun than most tier X TDs as much HP as same tier heavies, thatās a good idea
uh no
Naisu
The maus certainly didn't need the buff that it got
maus has poor gun after all, it is huge, and has sluggish front armor
Only bad thing about it is gun sucks, now is4 is a better maus, with dum and better turret
@final adder yeah i really want it
Is IS 4 better than Maus ?
Ya
no
How to bust through wall without damaging the barrel. (used in real life)
@rotund palm no
Is E100 worth it's price and xp?
Yes
Its insane how it can literally steamroll through anything
@serene saddle I have a hard time staying alive because of the speedy tanks, but thats just me
@humble storm yes
Imma farm to get IS 4 today
Good luck@keen escarp
Maybe like 50k xp a day? @marsh jackal Thankss!
@keen escarp npš¤
:)
@keen escarp how do you make that much a dayš¤
You basically use the booster and get the damage and kills
Oh ok
Grinding is pretty when you think about it but very hard in person
@keen escarp yes I knowš¤
yes.
š¤
Would double barrel tanks be added to the game?
Like ST-II or IS 3-II ?
@rotund palm idk
If they did add it but ST-II as prem and IS 3-II In tech tree
Maybe
ooh
uh, im asking you guys this. is the SP I C worth it?
Yes
It's good but Dracs and Amx CDC is your worst nightmare
ok
@rotund palm no amx cdc I destroyed it with the spic
Only Drac ?
Well if you know how to use the sp1c
You will have no problem of any tank..cause Im rushing infront of all of them
Question
that tank gets bullied a lot , it is not about u , it is about enemy @marsh jackal
You will have no problem of any tank..cause Im rushing infront of all of them
Is the isu a good tank?
@marsh jackal then enemy is nub , @solid gate ya
@solid gate yes if you know how to snipe
Alright
@haughty forge well just use the sp1c properly and you'll know how to win...yes when they spot me they all concentrate on me so it gives my teammates a good chances to kill them without shooting back
that is called yoloing
@solid gate hey
Just saying hey
@solid gate i think the m7 but i never played both tanks
@solid gate so which tank you play with mostly?
@solid gate i played the m7
@rotund palm IS-7 ammorack is a bit weak, but itās also due to the placement which allows enemies to hit it if they hit your pikenose frontally
oh i researched for M8A1 cuz it has a nice firepower
@marsh jackal what is your tier 8
my tier is IV just installed yesterday lol
Oh nicee
IV not VI
Yes i seen-
so any clans you guys in or what?
I am in
@solid gate you grinding for bc?
And that's my 2nd most played tank
im just started playing the game for 2 days or less and now i owe 5 tanks:
M8A1,M5 Stuart,M3 Stuart.Chi He, and the first tank everypeople start with.
LOL all of my tanks are so easy peasy to destroy
@solid gate you make yt videos?
i am grinding for Is 4
So many bots in tier 8 and nine
Aren't bots in Tier 1 only?
Tier 1 and I think two as well for the new players
What's better guys?
VK72.01K or VK90.01K?
@rotund palm hes saying like bad players
Ahhh yes bad players or some wallet warriors
I've encountered a wallet warrior in Tier X once
@rotund palm VK90
A chieftain Mk 6 with less than 200 battles was pushing me Out in the open when i was using Bat chat and he had the guts to call me a Nub because i was HE spammed cause of him
Bro this person in training had the Wz 111 5A
So he killed me i had progetto 46 then i used my Wz 113G FT on him and whooped him and then he left
Lol He didn't bother to fight back again?
I met the Chieftain Mk 6 again lol but I'm in a Maus it's time to push him to death like he did
Lol
Lol
Having a tier 10 gives you a lot of power in training rooms
@inland osprey true
I pushed him straight into an FV 183 and He ranted about THIS GAME SUCKS Lol
But hey at least we won the game with him only the dead one in our team lol
True lol
I'm trying to find him in Tier X battles again lol
But using a Different tank this time so he doesn't notice me lol
Lol
How to play su100 correctly
Tbh I've made it to 40k battles without properly knowing how to use a TD lol
Lol
I use my StuG like a medium tank
I play FV4005 Like a light tank and Jg Pz E100 Like a heavy tank and Ofc Forget the Fv 183 lol
Me too on amx 48 I always go to front line and go kill and ram due to my high speed 𤷠and then heavy tank come help. Never be a sniper at the back
I play the Tier 8 Foch Like a Jg Pz E100
Aggressive like an MS I
Yea, the gun reload is fast and thicc sloped armor
FV4005 is balanced Coz i can kill grille 15 in 3 HE shells
The clip is 3 right?
Then have some kid rage that i killed him and him/her calling me a gigantic nub for using HE
Correct, 3 shot auto loader @rapid orchid
Tier for tier probably not
Is it worth keeping?
Itās a tier 10 so I wouldnāt sell it
Cause i feel like i should sell it to get Ho-Ri and Foch 155
Dang now I'm starting to miss Gravity force I want my Maus to fly again
@solid gate you make yt videos?
@solid gate yes i do
but i hadnt published videos for a week
If They add P.1000 ratte then Russian Bias needs this
Imma see how many exp I'll get if i grind 12 hours non stop I'll start now
Should I rebuy tier 7 foch to grind mid gun for tier 8 foch or just grind tier 8 foch
Does anyone know when the krangvang line will come out. Dm if u have to a water so I actually read it.
@rotund palm imagine have 44 cannons but any of them penetrante a tier X with prammo
@gentle wasp hey bud, i recently got conway, any advice
Stock gun?
both, i free xped top gun'
Hmmm. Small gun has great handling and high pen HE. You could play more near the back I guess. I just donāt like the mobility and armor
guys i need to know something to get my next tank
wich one's better panther 1 or E 50 M
Panther tier for tier
Panther 1 , can brawl tier 8 tanks too,
Panther is a very solid tank tier for tier. Good dpm, decent mobility, nice pen with a great reload, and some thicc armor for a medium. It also has lots of weight, making ramming a lot more effective. There are some downsides, being that top gun doesnt have the best depression, you dont accelerate very fast, and the turret traverse isnt all that fast
I can speak from personal experience that the Panther is a great tank. As for the E 50 M..well..I havent gotten up to tier 10 yet.
@gentle wasp 400 alpha and nah mobility, i will lose trades with that gun
i actually ment the Leopard 1 but thanks now i know which one i'll get
Donāt trade then. You have nice gun handling and 3.3k DPM
@gentle wasp wut should i do
Donāt get hit lol
how?.... too slow to play with mediums and ofc , almost no armor
Play back somewhere
i will try when i get 100% crew, but right now first gun is meh
Iām not the best person to ask since I suck in it
i feel best with top gun
Playing either as heavy support or as a sniper seems to be the Conway's strength from what I've seen
With the big gun it is definitely heavy support
British Turreted TDs for the most part seem to follow the same sort of heavy/med support role with some occasional sniper roles mixed in
i learned how to play fv4005 from fatness, i just need to get it
They arent really my cup of tea (haha funny British joke) since they just feel like supporting mediums that I play as well. I prefer the Nashorn line. Good snipers, good dpm and they carry big guns. Most of them look nice, too
So far my favourite TD in that line has to be the Sturer Emil. Its playstyle is just so unique and fun, and the tank itself can be amazing when played right. I havent gotten to the Waffletractor yet, but I am looking forward to it
The Emil would be significantly better if it had more top speed. 26 is just awful.
Sturer?
Yes
Yep, Sturer Emil. 'Stubborn' in German if I remember correctly.
That's correct
It needs to have a better top speed. Something like 56. And a average speed of 39.
no , wtf
56? Good grief
Wow
Sturer Emil is fine where it is imo, the gun is the focus of the tank, it's can take a lot of weird angles as well
Yeah, thats where it excels. I do wish that the Emil had a bit more ammo, since almost every single other tank except for Tanks with 152s have an ammo count that greatly exceeds the Emils
If you want to play a faster Emil get a d-max
Yeah, I really dont mind the low speed. Makes you think and play differently. Besides..if I wanted to play a mobile sniper, I could play the Nashorn
I just think that the ammo count seems unreasonably low considering the guns alpha damage. While the alpha is quite high, I don't think its high enough and the caliber isnt large enough to make the Emil deserve having only 18 shells
The SU-152, a TD at the same tier as the Emil with a 152mm gun, can take more ammo into a battle than an Emil can
T26e4 super Pershing has been power creeped really bad. Its armour just doesn't work and bounce like it used to, and its gun is just underwhelming. Overall the tank is poor and isn't fun anymore.
So I just researched the T92E1 because I had a certificate, what do I research 1st?
can we have a bad premium tanks too?
I have the Sturer Emil but that stock grind is stubborn. I loved the sniper gameplay from the nashorn and I wonder what is another good sniper TD, I am grinding the Brit turret TDS because I think they are good snipers but are they?
Yeah, they are pretty good snipers, but they also function quite well as support for meds or heavys, especially the Conway with top gun.
Chaffees pretty good, and it leads to the Bulldog, which is a solid light tank
Superpershing is a joke of a tank. It has no side armour yet it cant hull down despite being as slow as ST-I
Guys is anyone getting over 1k ping with 60% loss and a long time on the synchronizing data screen?
@wide flame no need to post that message everywhere.
sorry martin
Hey should I keep or sell me T 34 1? š¤
VK 30.02 D isnt as bad as people make it out to be imo. It has good turret armor, similar to the Panthers. With the stock gun you have a good rate of fire and you are decently mobile, while having a decently beefy hp pool for a medium. While your pen sucks and your dpm isnt great either, its still a fun gun to play as long as you arent fighting tier 8s. Your hull armor and turret rotation speed is really bad tho. Its not an unplayable tank, but its not amazing either. I think it should recieve a pen buff on both guns, more on the stock gun and a buff to turret rotation speed.
Otherwise, its pretty good in hull down positions against other tier 7 and 6 mediums
I had a fun time driving the VK 30 D when I grinded through it. Definitely not a bad tank
@solid gate As for your question, it depends on how much you enjoy the tank and if you have credits to spare.
Ok
Otherwise, its pretty good in hull down positions against other tier 7 and 6 mediums
@wispy rain doesn't this say it all?
It's good in hull down when it is top tier
Another question is the chinese medium tree good to grind down?
Yeah, thats fair. I just see people claiming its unplayable and I feel like that isnt what the VK 30.02 D is. Its not good, but its not utter garbage either
@solid gate I'm not sure. The chinese medium line has really good turrets and can get 122mm guns, but they seem pretty average otherwise.
Idk why the VK 30.02M was removed imo its much better than the other VK meds at teir 6.
Ok thanks
Im not sure either, but the VK meds at tier 6 are still pretty nice tanks. VK 30.01 P is a fat med with a really nice top gun that allows you to slap other meds hard, while the VK 30.01 D is a nimble lil tank that is very bouncy on the turret and has a good rate of fire.
@narrow rampart. i have a question.
FV215B 183 still worth it????
In my opinion yes. It's not as strong as it was but big HESH for 1200+ never gets boring @solid gate
I still dont know wut hesh means
omg, thanks @narrow rampart ! everyone sayin is trash and blah blah blah. 1 more question.
can i subscribe to your channel? lol
High Explosive Squash Head. Its a very strange ammo type, using vibrations (I think?) From the impact of the shell on the tank to cause lots of internal damage
Huh sounds horrifying
Would it be worth my time to grind for the Sheridan?
Yes it would be worth it sheridan is rly good if you know how it works and how you win certain scenarios all around the sheridan is a good tank
Alright thanks
Np
Kinda a dumb question especially since I already have T92 and 60k experience on it for Sheridan
@solid gate sure you can sub. I would be honoured
...
High Explosive Squash Head. Its a very strange ammo type, using vibrations (I think?) From the impact of the shell on the tank to cause lots of internal damage
@wispy rain kinda, first it covers the external armor , then explodes and crew / modules gets heavily damaged from that armor collision
Ooh okay
So basically an apcr shell strapped with HE?
No, they are completely different
Oh
@solid gate watch war thunder shell types explained , from war thunder official
I've already seen how many and I'm afraid my brain will crash just trying to remember them all
I got the stock T92E1, what should I research first?
Gun
I have a Sherman firefly and researched top gun, should I fully upgrade or go for challenger
I'd recommend upgrade
i love shooting sherman fireflys
they're like big meatballs that u can pen from every angle
Fully upgrade @solid gate and use it as long range sniper schnitzel
The line is a bit... special. Not the easiest if you want to play somewhat close to the front
Warning logged for Krystian#1849. I couldn't DM them.
do you speek poulish
No, I don't @fierce rover
@narrow rampart, gonna subscribe to your channel now, but does that mean i can toon with chu?? pls, iām tryna max the at 15.
I almost have e50 researched, what modules should I research first, since there are quite a lot
I have about 20,000 free xp saved up
gun first, id then say turret or engine, tracks always last
Never take engine before track unless it gives you +100 or more horsepower. Tracks allows you to reduces dispersion on movement thus better aiming time
Im not sure if there was ever a tank that needs the top tracks before anything else
Well first should always be turret and guns anyway
Then tracks and engine or engine and tracks depending on what the new engine is capable of
Im very curious now..what is the most useless module in the game? Like, getting it does literally NOTHING for the tank
probably the engine for the St.Emil?
Radio on PC version bruh. But no modules in blitz are useless (or maybe the tier 7 gun on the KV 2 lul)
What about the 122s on the 152 family?
@sturdy root T-62A or STB-1, WZ-113 also has these qualities
STB-1 from what I have seen has no armor at all and the grind also has no armor
Thanks
the turret is quite nice, and yeah, grind is one of the worst
STB has great armor? Its a HD beast and somehow bounced with the hull as well because people have potato aim. Donāt overpeek ridges since your turret is small. Donāt show sides and rear because it can be HEād
It is by far my fav medium atm, bouncy medium
Looking in armor inspector the STB actually looks pretty bouncy on the turret, I just havenāt looked at it in a while, Iām mainly wondering if the Chinese heavies are good. 113 looks good with a great turret and good hull at max depression but idk about the grind
STB has a pretty bouncy turret, but you always want to keep the turret moving.
Upper front hull sloping allows for trollish bouncing.
Sides are worthless
sides are made of wet udon noodles
El vickers Ligth 105 esta rotisimo
English only
Solo podes hablar ingles aqui @rapid anchor
yeah
.
Give the jg E 100 a legendary camo, it needs one and its the only German teir 10 that doesnāt have one
anybody wanna talk about the panzer II j?
And how it's getting a much needed penetration buff next update and unnecessary nerf?
i would rather....how it's kinda OP, not saying it is, just an opinion
Which is better t59 or 59 patton
just watch one of therussianbadger's videos about world of tanks, he got 3 kills in a row (excuse me if i commit any spelling error, english is my second language)
Type 59, but I wouldn't get any of them the 59 is oowercreeped and the Patton just sucks
Smasher appears in my game -> puts me down to 2 digit health in 1 shot
should smasher be nerfed?
Is the t54e2 any good
the Smasher should be nerfed but probably never will,
The T54E2 is... kind of ok, it isn't the best tank at tier nine to put it mildly
ok thanks, I shall wait then
@solid gate for the russian Bias
omg wow
What is a good prem for grinding silver (only thing I want is for it to have a turret.)
lowe
ok, thanks
If you want a tuff turret and Know how to hide the Hull then T34
Eh i still pen the top of it
the lowe earns credits better
has really good gun
acceptable hull
and can hulldown
there is turret cheeks but those only really appear when a highpen gun is shooting at it
or when you switch to pramo
hard to ben nonetheless if you wiggle
ok good to know, now I have a goal for gold or if it shows up in shop
Iām thinking that the FV4005 should have an optional gun choice (auto loader, or a gun that is derp)
Is the nashorn a good ammo racker? I want a tank that I can easily ammo rack enemies from far away around tier 5/6
@solid gate WG said it will never happen, because FV215b 183 still there
Alright
Front turret armor of the E100 is garbage and should be buffed, it gets penned by lights from half way across the map like the T-22, Vickers light, and even the Leopard I, it's horrid
I think i found a stupid solution if someone wants to have and play FV4005 with 183mm's
It's the "Stage I", either for alternative tech tree from Conway-Stage II or prem/collector, thoughts? š¤
Also, for balancing purposes, it shouldnt have special consumables like on Stage II (Spall liner, Reticle calibration, Improved engine boost etc.)
@ebon parrot Sorry for the ping, but i confused the T54E2 with the T54E1 earlier. the T54E2 is a fairly good tier eight heavy, and it looks rather nice too. It's basically a tier eight T110E5, but between us, I don't think it's worth risking the gold with gambling
No. Good. 183. tank. It's no good to the game. I don't want to fight against it another two years like against the FV215b (183)
it's fine, thanks for the info
š
Oop
@alpine notch just make it's ammo rack go boom when hit by anything
Lol, true.. Grille 15 or other glass cannons too
I don't think I've ever seen or been ammo racked in a Grille before
I did get my rack hit today but I've never ever seen a detonation before š¤
Because they already way too fast to die by HE spams, before even getting ammo racked lol-
the Ammo is transported in a truck behind it, so when it's detonated the tank isn't destroyed
ah i see
What should I do against tanks that I can't pen? I'm usually in SU-100 and can't get around much, and I know HE shells can do some damage, but should i even waste my credits and reload on 50 damage?
For example, the AT8 / AT7 is very heavily armored and I have no clue what to do against them when they show up.
Should 1) I load AP and hope my RNGesus holds up
2) damage their tracks cuz why not
3) load HE and fire away
4) hold my reload and wait
I know some tanks can be penned through the tracks, but are ATs like that too?
AT's are ez pen if u shoot the cupola, it's only even easier if you're going against the AT8/7 with even bigger cupolas
yea but the SU-100 is meant for backline sniping (i learnt that the hard way)
so i usually can't aim at the top that well
but thanks for the advice guys!
Is that the AT-8
yea
pic from wothangar
Is the nashorn a good ammo racker? I want a tank that I can easily ammo rack enemies from far away around tier 5/6
@solid gate there is no such thing as a good ammo "racker"
Hey everyone. Iām having some issues playing the T-54 Itwt. Itās not to fast, has no armor, and only 5 degrees if gun depression. Any advice or tips for how to play it?
I think i found a stupid solution if someone wants to have and play FV4005 with 183mm's
It's the "Stage I", either for alternative tech tree from Conway-Stage II or prem/collector, thoughts? š¤
Also, for balancing purposes, it shouldnt have special consumables like on Stage II (Spall liner, Reticle calibration, Improved engine boost etc.)
@alpine notch adding another 183mm into the game is a really terrible idea
and making it a premium or a collectible is even more Fword worse
183s just dont belong in the game.
@strange thicket
In a game like Blitz, yeah, there's a reason on PC they replaced the 215b 183 with the Badger, since it fits the tortoise.
And kept the 4005 S-2 as the single 183, it was honestly balanced, having the biggest gun in the game with somewhat okay mobility but being able to be derped by ANYTHING, even some tanks at tier 3.
Added a massive risk factor anytime you wanted to poke out to fire since anything could spot you, not to mention arty is a 4005's nightmare.
But on Blitz they've nerfed the 215b 183 quite a bit, sometimes even too much, and yeah I play the 183 casually as well as fight against it on other tanks.
Yeah you still hit hard, but you're practically a 4005 without the movement or gun handling since the armor doesn't work as well as you think it would. If you don't hide somewhere nearby for the first 2 minutes then surprise someone with an ambush, you're already dead or can't fire a 2nd shell.
By that point half your team has been picked off because you can't support them like you could in literally any other TD. Almost doesn't seem worth it at times, basically got the KV2 treatment at tier 10. Not something you can play if you want to be a contributing tank, and not something you can play for fun since you have to actually take it serious.
The only tanks the 183 seems to be excellent against is meds, lights, or certain TDs that rush too early.
Which no one who's competent will do in tier 10
nice essay, but im not gonna read it. C:
@strange thicket It is a stupid solution though, you dont have to take it srsly-
@fervent sand your best bet is to look up how to play t54 ltwt videos on youtube. There's lots of em.
M6a2e1 exp. give me ur opinions
Good, but not enough
Nice gun, nice turret, nice depression, enjoy getting nuked by the sides
@real gorge Pub match tank, any decent player is going to wipe an EXP out as long as they are in a decent tank.
Got this for $10
ok?
i got the tank for basically nothing lol. 3 crates is all it took
I got the T54E2 on the first crate
Look at this
Ah yes. I have no idea what this is .
@solid gate there is no such thing as a good ammo "racker"
@strange thicket
incorrect bigger the weaker the enemy's module gives better chance of ammo rack, if aimed properly and rng roles right
it goes boom better than smoller pew pew guns
Some guns have higher module damage (why the t49 was broken when first introduced) I personally find that my kpz gets a ton of ammowrecks compared to anything else that I play.
Imagine grille with armor.
is KV 3 good
ya
Itās ok. Good sidescraper
guys is pz s35 a good tank?
No @normal depot
Not anymore. Used to be one of the go to sealclubbers but now no. Slow, bad armour and bad penetration/ damage
Pew pew gun with bad pen. Decent mobility but armour wise nothing special. The bundle is great value but there is a reason why that bundle is so good 
I still have it and itās not much fun to drive
then sell it for 1200 gold and restore it whenever u feel like doing it
Yeah, itās worth a lot, but I donāt sell it because I am a bit of a collector
oh ok how do u get pz 4 s?
Was an event tank at one point, then it's come up in special offers every so often
how do u get vindicator ultramarine then?
Tbh my only collector tank is Vk 90.01K got it in my first snow globe in Christmas event
I'm not even a collector i was hoping to get 10k gold in the Christmas event but the Vk 90 Is good
The Pz IV S. was only in events in the form of being part of crates you could win during the event, but it was initially sold with its starfighter camouflage (-o-)
@normal depot Was an event tank originally too (about a year and a half ago?) and then has been sold in a bundle since then too
Yeah, you could only get it twice and the event that introduced it was one of the hardest doable events ever
Btw how to get an FV217 badger ?
You need to buy it once itās in store
do u know how much a pz 4 s and a vindicator cost?
In crates?
Lol I completely missed the warhammer event because the Microsoft store wouldn't download the update for a week and a half or something and it happened to be the week of the event š
I actually got them for free. I was sick both weeks, and I stayed sick over the two weeks because I played so much
nice arent they super expensive?
The bundle they were sold in later on was right in line with WGās pricing policy at the time, which is expensive by todayās standards
The Predator is a bit of a bad tank so they canāt ask for too much for it
From what I can remember the bundle with both of them was about £50?
Oh wait was there 3 of the tanks in the bundle actually? Idk it was overpriced for their performance no matter what lol
It was two and I canāt remember the price, I only remember laughing at it because it was so much for two mediocre tanks
It was one of the prime examples that showed that WG was overpricing heavily at the time. Luckily we have a very reasonable pricing policy now
Yeah prices are fairly good now compared to what they have been, there's still the odd laughable deal but most things are about right
I am just kind of disappointed that the GuP tanks were not in an event
I mean, they are fairly high tier, so I would have understood if itās extremely hard, but as it is itās a bit... meh
It seems like WG only like to do sets of tanks in events once and then sell them for money afterwards, like the CDC, kpf, exp etc
KpfPz 70 had a realistic chance of becoming at tank that you could grind over several events
Was an event tank originally too (about a year and a half ago?) and then has been sold in a bundle since then too
@thick trout it was sold in regular bundles before it was made an event tank
The Pz. IV S. or the Vindicator UM?
@narrow rampart I don't remember that at all lol must have been when I was still a noob and didnt want to spend money lol
i restored my pz s35!
59 patton worth it?
... didnt want to spend money lol
@thick trout famous last words, no? š¤£
Believe me, I can relate LOL
I got it before
I need to collect badly. Also why did you guys nerf the valentine pen
@thick trout famous last words, no? š¤£
@narrow rampart As famous last week as the week before that, and the week before that and the...
@thick trout do you do youtube vids?
Pls add this tank to the game
@fathom gate no need to post that on the entire server.
But i reaalllyy want an austrian tank in this game as an austrian
They will need to work on that tech tree tho @fathom gate
@fathom gate Centurion 5/1. RAAC is coming š
That's Australian, not Austrian @haughty forge
@keen escarp Nope lol Martin is the one you want on that front š
oop.
@narrow rampart my bad , i did not read carefully lol
I researched it but no creds
Oh i got 7.7 mil :)
Your lucky cause i wasted 9 Mil creds on Gravity force
huh how?
Trying to make my Maus fly lol
Bruh!
Wargaming can add this austrian š¦š¹ tank as premium with austrian flag. Like ac vi sentinel which has australian flag
But atleast it flew straight into a flying sheridan lol
Dang i miss Gravity force we need it permanently
@rotund palm that would remove the fun out of it
You spent 300 battles on nothing.
Who? I'm proud i wasted 300 Battles lol
U
Way better than trolling in Chill/Date training rooms
that group with 3 maus trollin
Then the group with bat chat , progetto and T57 Heavy
I do trolling with my bro with his Maus too lol
@neon zenith not that but thiz
I want Centurion 5/1 RAAC
@naive obsidian that one is under testing atm so it will come eventually
:)
@narrow rampart it has so much armor
Addddddd sk105
I wonder if we're getting Jap heavies
They won't come to Blitz as they are extremely hard to balance properly
How about swedish TDs and Heavies
just set up some lore where the japanese heavies get hit by a shrink ray, then release them
I am so ready for 7.2 or 7.12
@rotund palm Swedish heavies are coming next, Tier 8-10, with two Swedish mediums at tier 6-7. #coming-soon
As for the TDs, I believe Wargaming have stated somewhere they do not plan on adding them for the foreseeable future.
Any general advice for the T110E5?
Why is the IS-4 considered better than IS-7
Better armor, better penetration values
IS4 has significantly easier to use armour in random games, and in tourneys it has much better HEAT pen and a turret almost invincible to prammo
@viral lodge One tip I could give is that just because you are designated as a heavy tank, it does not mean you always have to go the heavy route.
E5 works well bullying enemy mediums and supporting your own mediums.
Also, try to use your 8 degrees of gun depression wherever you can and keep the turret moving. A lot of players in random battles will find it difficult to go through your turret.
Accurate description of the sweating the bullied mediums see
Got it, I was already doing the latter but was normally fighting heavies, ill try mixing my routes up, thanks for the advice, should help a bit. @tulip edge š
No problem mate
I know that APCRs are quite expensive. Should I still use them to pen when I know my team is going to lose? Should I use them early game to pen or just leave them to others?
@storm apex Do you own any/many prems that you like playing?
If you arent low on credits and you cant pen dont be afraid to load prammo, its better to lose some credits than lose the round. Basically you have 3 options when you see something and cant pen.
1: Load Prammo.
2: Reposition.
3: Die.
furiously press 3
@neon zenith not that but thiz
@rotund palm hruh that can ruin the entire game
Why is the IS-4 considered better than IS-7
@smoky narwhal because it doesn't get ammo racked in every battle
furiously press 3
@kindred wren lol
@thick trout
what are perms.
but I like playing the IS-3 and the SU-100
Premium tanks, anything that makes credits easily
no I don't have premium tanks š¦
but i do have ~100k credits rn
I have a habit of keeping lots of useless tech tree tanks so I might sell them
That's pretty low
Then I would suggest saving up gold from ads to buy something cheap like that Mathilda IV on sale atm, and then try to use prammo as little as possible
i play wotb on pc, how do I play ads?
I can't find the ad button lol
Another useful thing is to sell the ammo and provisions of old tanks you don't play
Unfortunately you can't get ads on PC, you got to install it on mobile and login with the same account then watch them through there
oh ok.
how else can I get gold?
If you want to grind credits I believe the BDR is still the best tech tree tank for that? It was a little while ago I looked but I think it's still right
And basically spending money
lol p2w is always the answer in any game
anyhow, thx for the advice
Make sure to open the free crates as often as you can, and the mission crates. They give good amounts of credits, and if lucky youāll get a premium tank (from those weekly crates not missions) which will help you grind credits
ok thx
@storm apex Gold videos to, you get like 18k+ every year
He is on PC so he doesnāt get those, sadly
Which is annoying
So I just got the ISU-152. Should U grind for the BL-10 first? The top stock gun isnt so bad, it has decent pen and it reloads quick
I*
@wispy rain If you fine with 122mm, just go ahead grind it for BL-10, the other top 152mm not worth grinding it imo
Ah, I see! Im guessing I should get top engine and tracks after BL-10?
Yes, should be obvious if you are having trouble with mobility
For me, probably having BL-10 on last, since i want to suffer and troll people
Tracks > Engine > Top 152mm gun > BL-10
The largest struggle im having right now is the track traverse rate, but training crew to 100% should fix that. I dont have the free xp to get the bl-10 sadly. The stock engine accelerates good enough for me since its not exactly a frontline TD
su152 derp gun is still ok in tier 8, u can use it
But if i get uptiered with su 152 derp gun, its going to be p a i n
yes, especially when meeting buffed tanks like tiger 2 etc
So itll be even worse with tier 9s in the ISU-152
i was grinding till bl10, forgot about that another (tier 9?) gun
There is the BL-9S which is a better 122
bl10 is best
welp 122 gun is ok, not awesome in tier 7, but dpm is always a good thing
bl10 and bl9s has same dpm
Im using the D-25 mod 1944 right now, it seems to be the best to use stock without 100% crew
@wispy rain no , 175mm pen on tier 8 is just trash , use stock gun and use calibrated then spam HEAT
I dont have the credits to spare to spam heat sadly
well, i said its ok in tier 7, but 8... Sure u can throw gold in enemy face, but...
Im a f2p player so I dont have a premium tank i can use to get credits quick and i barely have 200k creds rn
@wispy rain Then use the derp gun and spam HE with rammer for 300 damage a shot
owh, well that escalated quickly
then dont play, it is just going to be pain without bl 10, get bl 10 using free exp and earn credits if u dont want to use free exp for bl 10 and use calibrates shells, spam heat , or like Posit1ve said, spam HE or u will be just pain for ur team
yup
I see..I think getting ISU-152 as this accounts first tier 8 may have been a mistake
as i mentioned, use su152 derp till u grind exp for bl10
So just a full he loadout with rammer then