#vehicles-discussion
1 messages · Page 315 of 1
It very much depends on the driver. As I said, you don't need to have driven a tank to understand it, but what I left out was that you need to drive a tank to determine if you like it. You may not like the T-34-3, but that doesn't mean it's a bad tank @subtle mason
You can Check the CCs take on this tank
i didn't enjoy it at all when i first got it from the event
but with some guidence it turned out to be decent
is the Sheridan worth going for after 7.0 ? i am about to research the t92e1
Plus we never said it was perfect/impervious. We just said it wasnt nearly as bad as you were making it out to be. It's able to perform well enough and it holds a unique enough playstyle to warrant being played every once in a while @subtle mason
they’re both pretty good at what they do
As I initially said, it's a very niche tank.
You literally said it wasn't unique but whatever
Chrysler K is unique. M4a1 Rev is unique. But T-34-3? Nah.
@subtle mason
Well, do you know the difference between niche and unique?
@subtle mason e d i t e d
Something unique fills a niche. If it fills a niche, it can be unique by extension
Yeah, it was edited because there's a slow mode.
It doesn't work that way. Niche tank means that the tank is not a good all-around that works in all situations.
That's not what niche means at all
Unique means there's exactly one, 'uno' being Latin for 'one'. There are two of the T-34-3 style, the tech tree 34-2 exists.
cmon, that’s semantics. unique basically means niche, there’s really no difference
Niche in WoT just means that a tank excels in a subset of particular scenarios.
And often is subpar in other scenarios.
@worn swift I'm arguing for them both as a pair since they're practically the same tanks (just minor differences). I'm arguing for them as a unit (uni=one) rather than just the 34-3
@worn swift I'm arguing for them both as a pair since they're practically the same tanks (just minor differences). I'm arguing for them as a unit (uni=one) rather than just the 34-3
@broken sentinel Saegifu specifically referred to the 34-3 when saying it's not unique.
Niche means that there is a unique subset of qualities that a specific tank fulfills. It has nothing to do with how well the tank performs in other scenarios
Well, they are still different, unique and niche. Both batchat and progetto are unique. But bat chat is niche and works well NOT IN ALL situations. While progetto is a good all-around.
That's not what I'm arguing. If he wants to take it further, I can just argue that it's a premium with many differences that make the tanks unique in themselves. I'm simply arguing for them both as a unit in that their playstyles are similar. They're both unique and similar, but both fill the same niche.
Progetto can’t reliably bounce shells, nor DPM anyone when the mag’s empty. there’s plenty it can’t really do all that well
They're both unique and similar
@broken sentinel Oxymoron detected.
That's not the fault of it filling a niche though. Drawing that conclusion is an observation, not a definition for the meaning of a niche @calm inlet
@worn swift if you want me to get into the meaning behind that sentence, I can
Progetto isn’t niche
Progetto + Pantera fills the niche of autoreloaders
eh, i don’t see the autoreloader even being used that effectively these days but okay ill admit that
Progetto can’t reliably bounce shells, nor DPM anyone when the mag’s empty.
Progetto can bounce mediums well, actually. B-C can do it only on some lucky days. However, Progetto can at least load shells into its mag without reloading fully. And the DPM is still much higher the one of batchat.
Anyway in current meta both b-c and progetto are niche tanks that are mostly subpar compared to superior t62-a, 140 and e-50m.
Progetto isn’t niche
@calm inlet If you want to be technical, most tanks have a niche. There's not actually that many true all-rounders in the game. A true all-rounder would be something like the Obj. 430U on PC, which isn't particularly great at any one thing, but it can do literally everything.
The T-34-3 being unique amongst other tier 8 medium tanks
The T-34-3 and T-34-2 being unique tanks themselves, yet sharing similar playstyles
lol i’m way too tired for this conversation.
Progetto isn’t niche
am i drunk? that’s not what i meant to say lol. i was just trying to say that it wasn’t an all rounder tank
@broken sentinel Thanks, I was actually unaware the alpha difference was that big between the two.
Damn son, you can say the same about ANYTHING. Every tank is unique, yeah?
@worn swift he just equipped the low alpha gun on it. T34-2 can play with two guns.
The T-34-3 and T-34-2 being unique tanks themselves, yet sharing similar playstyles
@broken sentinel you got the 100mm on the 34-2
@worn swift I had the wrong gun, but my statement still stands
T-34-2 is superior with 122mm
ok where is this conversation going lol. i think we’re all like in a bundle of agreement and disagreement at the same time
They are inherently different yet offer the same general playstyle. That's what I meant by "they're unique yet similar" @worn swift
So basically, that screenshot proves that T-34-3 is not near being "decent". T-34-2 outperforms it, and the armor is neglectible anyway.
@broken sentinel Wdym T-34-2 is literally just better now.
no, 34-3 doesn’t get autopenned in the hull and has better HEAT pen. 34-2 is good but the 34-3 is hardly “worse”
It is, that's still being different. They also share completely different armor layouts. The T-34-3 has a better hull and a worse turret. The T-34-2 has a terrible hull but a better turret
@calm inlet they have the same HEAT pen though.
I never realised how many tier 8 mediums there were until this moment.
T-34-2 is better because it is much more mobile, has even lower profile and dispersion on move is alsobetter. Meds pen t34-3 anyway.
@subtle mason double check that, i’m pretty certain the T-34-3 has 270 and the T-34-2 has 250
@calm inlet 275 is with calibrated. The gun is the same
Each standard tank pretty much has its own premium version:
- Pantera/Progetto
- Panther II/Panther 8,8
- T-34-2/T-34-3
- Pershing/T25 Pilot 1 (upcoming prem)
- Indien Pz. / Mutz
Etc etc
@subtle mason it says in-game that the 34-3 has 270 and 34-2 has 250, both with rammer
Each of these tanks is technically unique, but they share similar playstyles
it has 270 heat without CS with CS it is 297
yeah, viewed the ingame. It's higher actually. That's funny, to say the least. A bug?
no, a feature
the guns have different bloom and aim time, so why not pen
yeah, viewed the ingame. It's higher actually. That's funny, to say the least. A bug?
@subtle mason Not a bug. WG makes guns have different stats on different tanks all the time.
Thoughts on batchat pen
Not a bug. WG makes guns have different stats on different tanks all the time.
I'm still frustrated of having "different" guns for e100 and vk72
but the guns are literally different as well lol, they have different names and look different in-game
Thoughts on batchat pen
@zealous anchor i run the tank with vents but i strongly recommend Calibrated Shells for most people
Ah I see okie
I also run BC with vents. feels... Smoother.
Haha looking forward to it's buff
I wish they boosted view range/camo for b-c.
:o
I wish they gave it 2.5 seconds intra-shell reload
How bout gun elevation/dep or 2.5 intra or pen
Currently grinding Bat-Chat line rn, now at AMX 13 75, wish me luck-
Give all of that!
Autoloading tanks are generally better with vents imo than calibrated. If it has meh pen, you're better off buffing basically every single stat on your tank instead of just pen, and if it has terrible pen, it's kinda useless to put calibrated shells on it anyway.
idk man I really like penning the upper plate of a Maus in my T57 Heavy lol
Yeah, but bat chat doesn't face the enemy's faces most of the time, at least. AT LEAST it shouldn't.
true, I just like being able to pen things like E100s and Mauses more reliably. I'll have to give Vents a try though, see how it goes
I'm at batchat AP now, can't wait to grind the batchat and free xp the gun
Well, the tier X batchat doesn't feel as good as AP one, though, on that level.
You mean tier for tier?
Yeah. Seems to me I was much better on tier 9 b-c than on the X tier. I mean, I have like 4 masteries for ~105 battles.
I see. For me the 50B felt worse than 50 120 but I have yet to grind max crew skills it might be because of the crew....or maybe because 50 120 gets to destroy tier 8s
isn't that the same case with E50 and E50M
E50 feels better because you can bully tier8s
On paper tier X is much better, but in tier X battles bat chat 9 felt like more in place.
I kinda hate tier 9 batchat for it's mobility rn, doesn't few like Leo or leo pta
vents only does buff some slightly mobility and gun stats. i just ran the Batchat 25t with CS and i got 3600 damage so it’s not like, a huge deal
I see, I shall try both when I get it
Also petition to remove grindable modules for tier x??
should i keep going for the sheridan after 7.0 or go for the vickers instead?
I kinda hate tier 9 batchat for it's mobility rn, doesn't few like Leo or leo pta
It may be so that I like the tier X less because I play it much more carelessly. I mean, it has much more speed so I rush in faster and, you know.
@strange thicket E 50 M tier for tier feels more comfortable to drive imo, yeah you don’t get to bully T8, but it’s turret armor and gun dep help so much
How is it at brawling Russsian meds like god-22
@hollow belfry i am thinking about whether i should keep the E50 or sell it
i usually sell tier IXs after i get the Tier 10 except if they are something like the jagtiger
I juz keep tier 6-10 for all my lines 🤪
yeah i don't have the gold for all those slots
It depends if I really need credits or not (well that happens quite often) and if I like the tank or not
i am tryna save some gold for the lowe
i need something to grind credits with
EXP got really old
I actually can't remember where I got the slots, maybe events/prem tanks I got for free and I sell the tank / update 5.5
I never sell tanks higher than tier 8.
Vents are useful on a few autoloaders otherwise it’s critical to have CS on some
I actually can't remember where I got the slots, maybe events/prem tanks I got for free and I sell the tank / update 5.5
@zealous anchor yeah i am not playing since that long lol
How about for batchat In ur opinion@solid gate
The only ones I sold were... Ferdinand and VK, I sold them to get quick cash for getting t34-3 in the event.
Oh I see
Batchat needs CS the vents barely give a slight difference to other stats it’s better having extra penetration than a slight decrease in reload
Mm
I have like 37 tanks at the moment, 12 of which are 6-7 tier.
I run vents on T71 instead of CS I don’t ever use the auto loader on bulldog
I run vents on T71 instead of CS I don’t ever use the auto loader on bulldog
@solid gate who does
it literally shouldn't be there
it is useless
is the panther 8.8 even worth getting
nope
should i go for patton?
It's not the best t10 med but it is very fun to play
Should i buy the Centurion or just wait for an new update tank?
Im totally dont know what to buy
Got enough free xp for either: wz121 or T110E5 or m48 patton. Which one should I go for?
I’d say 121
121 since the t9 is the worst of the 3
Patton isn’t that interesting since the STB exist, and yeah better free exp the 121 line since the WZ-120 on top of that has a costly and painful stock grind
Thanks all
I guess I’ll go for the WZ-121 after I finish the 113 line
Patton is a tier 10 Sherman. It can do great in right hands.
Tbf any tank can do well in the right hands
WG forgot Patton. All meds gets buff, i dont see Patton change in year.
I’m not saying the Patton can’t do well in the right hands, but the STB-1 is just better.
Have both and have to agree. Patton is soild, but stb is just better
Well, i'm thinking to grind FV4202 now. But i'm looking at the British lights. Looks awesome.
Anyway, i got comet. I can get both tier VIII
I don’t plan to grind a british line in the near future, but lights will arguably be better than the meds
The thing is you can grind a relatively decent line to get the patton. Or the pain which is the Japanese meds to get a better Patton.
Bigger pain better reward
Got the 4202, the lights seem miles better than the med line
I wish i could have Maus
@fast compass i think on STA-1 onwards, the line gets better. But of course, can't stand a shot.
Idk if I will go for the 121 or finish the german tech tree after I got my WZ-113. The only german T9 I didn’t research is the Mauschen
I should go for 121. Mauschen is a serious pain. Only pro is the armor.
What i dont like at the Maus is that his turret moves so slow
Patton isn't in a great spot right now, specially since the heavy meta
The Maus weighs 188 tons, don’t expect it’s turret to traverse fast lol
The Patton isn't just suitable for this meta cause of the speed and DPM
I think i should go that line or should i go like e50m
E 50 M is very good. Probably my favourite tank
Get E50M. If you know how to angle armor, and cover lower plate, it's fine.
But i have now vk 30.01 D lol
I use calibrated Shell on E50M, can pen a Foch 155 in his face
It destroys pretty much any med or light easily. Not to mention it can even ram some t10 heavies as it’s heavier lol
I got E50M first on German line. Grinding Tiger I and Tiger II is easy as you unlock some guns and the engines.
I have nightmare and it can hit like 200 damage
Reload is 7.1s with calibrated shells. works for me...
Recently a T-62a on Normandy thought that it would be a good idea to flank. He changed his mind after a 704 dmg ram.
If i use HEAT i can pen a T62a or OBJ140 upper plate even in angle.
I use HEAT shells for nightmare
That's crazy. U get a TD like pen on E50M HEAT shell using calibrated Shell.
Killing a full hp T-62a while losing 300hp in an E 50 M feels satisfying. Aside from the ram dmg, he didn’t pen me once. Permatracked by bumping in his side too. Literally 2014 free dmg
I am using At2 too and it reloads so fast
Plus the E 50 M grind overall isn’t that bad after the Panther I and II buffs. And getting to the T10 ramming lights for 850 hp is more than worth it
What is your highest Tier?
10 actually as there’s no 11 in the game lol
I rammed a T92E1 for 1k earlier in my E50
a sher boi rammed my maus after turning a corner in winter malinovka
he went from full HP to zero faster than i could start laughing
at him
I always make a beeline towards a Sheri in my Leopard 1 whenever I have the oppurtunity.
Ramming into those things at 65mph, and at being twice their weight is always a pleausre to watch
get an e50m it is soo much fun cos u can go 60 and with the weight other medium tanks just go ... off
but nothing can fight the MAUS especially the gravity mode
Finally sold the IS-2
I have the Mod1, Rev, and Chimera, what other med prems are unique/fun to play? (I like meds)
Rudy is a solid earner. Lorraine if you like a challenge. Bromwell is a must. Amx 30 1er is super good.
59 Patton is a fun one
Tier 9 stock meds lam0
T 34 85 rudy is fun to play
The WZ-120 has a very bad depression. Since it is totally useless in most cases, I wondered if it was playing like a TD?
Really depends on how you run it imo, for my yolo wagon I have no problems getting shots most of the time
ok, what's the most fun tier 9 and tier 10 to carry all kind of teams? for me it's t92e1 for tier 9 and not sure about tier 10
@short plinth I like the Amx 30 1er and then probably 62a.
Yup T-62A's quite easy to carry in
@gentle wasp @rustic tulip don't have that tank, if i'm going to get it, which line should i go, t54 ltwt or t44 line?
The t54 light weight's a fine tank and line. tbf the whole line's pretty good. eh
@short plinth t44 is better for nubs and to learn the playstyle but the ltwt line is far more fun
@rustic tulip It is one of the most useless tanks to play. When you take the hill on Mines, you can’t shoot, you don’t have the required depression, falls creek, medium side, it’s the same, it’s very complicated, and so on.
not true, the mobility lets it take advanced spots and the gun dep isnt all that bad, just below average
The medium flanks are usually very hilly. But that doesn't mean you HAVE to go up there if you have shots available. I usually play it second to frontline where I can step in with my armor If I need to while still being able to put in shots
cmon, i just spent 80k xp to get ltwt
good decision
@rustic tulip Yes but the hill is very important if you don’t take it the part is lost in most cases
Is the 75mm or 88mm better for VK 36.01 H?
I loved Tier VII and Tier VIII, but Tier IX is a sore.
@swift harness I like 88mm since it is a heavy
@lofty saddle You shouldn't be the only lt/mt at your flank. There should be some gun depression based tanks there. If there's none, you can only rely on your tds to whack their enemies making too aggressive plays
I think most people choose 88mm for VK 36
yes, although if you struggle with pen/accuracy you can try the 75
i still am thinking it would be neat for the kpf to have a 120mm
No
Kpf is fine as is, it just needs maybe some more depression (1-2) and a slight HE damage buff
T 62A is love, T 62A is life.
So I when a head and got the chimera is it worth it to use adrenaline over reactive armour or not?
I think so, if you're gonna use it against heavies you can get a bounce and unload some good damage before running again
I actually don't because you shouldn't be exposing that long to take multiple shots anyway. might just be my playstyle
That's what I'm thinking but I dont have enough experience with the chimera yet to know and usually I'll just use it in an oh no situation or when flanking and I've got a great los
i tried it but i dont have the muscle memory right, i kept hitting it when I wanted to repair so I just gave up
Lol I dont use muscle memory hands are too shaky for that
Object 263 or Foch 155
Im about equal in terms of line progress and I dont know which one to choose
The foch 155 is the second highest wr of tds if that's anything to consider
I forgot how to play my IS5 after getting the T34 heavy
yeah I was thinking of the foch even though the grind looks painful
Where exactly are you at it?
@tulip sail Adrenaline over reactive armour, you arent a brawler, reload is too long for that, you shouldnt be in any situations where reactive armour would benefit enough over adrenaline.
@smoky hedge it's been one of the most decent grinds I've had on any line so far. I don't have the 155 yet (only 50k away) but it's been pretty fun the whole time
is4 or is7
is4
It's here for a reason
@gentle wasp can is4 sidescrape?
It can to some degree, the plates offset from the upper glacis can be an issue however
technically no, but most of the time it works well
I need a 705A and 60 TP on Blitz. WG hear my prayer.
@solid gate kinda
.
sHouLd i UsE mAuS or Ei0o?
I'm personally not familiar with the "Ei0o" but the Maus is pretty good
Old Mcdonald had a farm
Ei
Ei
0o
I may be bias but I think it’s time WZ 121 gets a legendary camo...
I may be bias is it cuz ur asian
I wonder what kind of "theme" the camo should have
The E100 and Maus both have camos that have a "sturdy" vibe to them
I feel like the 121 could have a camo that's a lil more "explosive"
wait what
🤔
Hey I’m doing maus platoon who wants to join?
what?
Tortoise deserves an armor buff imo
i mean at least make the frontal plate like 180mm thick
TOG/KV 2* TX premium
Has reload of tog but with KV2 Alpha Damage
Speed -5kmh
HP 1 (Armour is too thick for any shell to penetrate)
Special ability: When activated next shell becomes an atgm
Wow
Ok load HE and kill it with splash damage 🤣
Well, i think WG should consider rework the IS-8 model, and rename it to T-10, same way they done in PC WOT, at least to make the tank more beatiful, IS-8 is ugly...
I agreed, I love the Is-8. I use to run a mod of the T10-M, basically Models from Wot PC but the devlopper couldn't update the mod with the recent game updates and it just made my game crash.
oh that looks cool
Yeah, way better looking than atual ingame. It's beatiful asf!!
Would they ever sell a low tier tank under $2.99
Maybe but probably for Black Friday only
You can also watch ads and eventually You'll get a Premium tank anyhow, one much better than the low tiers
T-54 or T30, I only have a credits and free xp for only one of them
if you are going to use free xp spend it on the t30, since the T28 Proto is garbage
T30 is still amazing
@gentle wasp , i played through T28prot , it was kind of good and bad
@tranquil maple ltwt is a better tank tho
I researched T-54 with T44 , i only have 75k free xp and i could research the turret and the gun
ahh so you would be using the free xp to max out the T-54? interesting...
175mm pen gun would be so bad for grinding
T30 without the big boy gun is also kinda pathetic
or Maybe i might buy ST-1 , Gun and turret has been researched on it
which are you focused on, the t9 or the t10? because those are 3 really good t9s, but the St1 is probably the worst. T30 leads to a bad t10. not sure
yeah t110e4 is power creeped by other tanks so
ST-I is actually pretty solid, lately it's all I've been hearing about in the Vet chat @gentle wasp
ST-1 can be compared to E75 or Vk45.02b
i thought the consensus was that the e75 was better
Lately people are saying ST-I > E 75 but E 75 is still good
also I am comparing it to 2 other really strong t9s lol. Ah I have been hearing the opposite but I am not in vet chat so idk
VK 45.02 B is absolutely trash
Neither the turret nor the hull armor are good for Sidescraping
So...play it Hulldown and wiggle so the cheeks don't get penned
yeah i have 60% on vk45b , it wasnt that bad , pretty decent .
any idea how bad is Vk72k ?
pretty bad
cant be better than e100 right ?
nope it sure isn't
VK 72 is garbage
Can't angle, can't hull down, can't sidescrape
Unless you’re playing in CIS server where people shoot a lot less gold, VK72 is frustratingly awful
They even made the gun worse. No reason in playing it over E 100
or i will just wait for the NEW british lights i guess
Pz 2 J needs a pen buff
Or you could have just not bought it
I said it needs a pen buff, not that I want a refund
I'm happy with having a fun little tank with a kinda unique play style, but the pen on it is just horrible, can't even pen sides of tanks with premium at 90° angles
You bought a clubbing tank, this is what happens
Lol
Are you actually dumb. The reason I bought it isn't seal clubbing, how the fk am I supposed to seal club knowing it has such s--t pen...
I bought it cause it was rare and cheap. If I wanted seal clubbing I'd just run a ke-ni or something, besides I don't even play lower tiers that much
I wrote that because the tank literally is s--t on a stick, and I hope they make it at least playable
I dont club and its a collector, its stats are available for free on websites, you could of checked, not every tank has to be usable lol ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Then don’t seal club geez
Okay, I'm gonna repeat to you.
I know it has s--t stats.
I know it isn't what it used to be before 5.5.
I know there's a lot of tanks that became s--t after 5.5.
What I wanted to say is, even tho all the tier 3 are mediocre at best now, the Panzer serves literally just one purpose, being on a shelf (or, in the garage I suppose). I would like to see it have at least some purpose on the battlefield in the future, but it probably won't happen and instead I'll get people raging at me for spending my own money.
If you knew it was garbage then why would you buy it and then come complain about it?
Okay now you're just trolling
All I said was that I'd like to see a tank made playable, in a chat where people discuss tanks.
But I thought you weren't going to play it, and if you buff it then it will just encourage sealclubbers 🤔
My dudes, are you actually dumb
Every tank is technically play able
How is that trolling please answer my previous question
Did I say "make the Pz 2 J OP, give it 100mm of armor and a 122mm gun" or did I just suggest it getting a pen buff?
Answer my question first.
Okay now, look
Yes? I will gladly discuss with you if you just answer my question
As I said, I just suggested a pen buff. I bought the tank for two reasons, because it's rare AND because I thought it would be fun. I wanted to challenge myself to see if I could play the game in a tank that has to aim for weak spots only.
In short, I bought it and I knew it was bad - but I expected it to at least pen some premium shots
Low pen is always workable.
But you knew the pen was absolute garbage anyway. Any you tuber or forumer or player here would have told you not to buy it because the pen is atrocious.
Honestly it is fun, I destroyed a few tanks only filling up their machinegun ports with shots, but those moments are really rare
I don’t know what you expected, it is a slow tank with near-useless pen. Just accept the loss of a couple bucks and move on.
Well tbh you're right
Thank you. I understand if you bought a t10 because of a marketing ploy but this is just a garbage tank. Eat the loss.
If you want to play a lower tier lower pen tank play Leo and dont load prammo and run vents. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
...you know, I might try just that, sounds fun enough
Difference is Leo has speed to get to flanks. Still not enjoyable but at least bearable
Oh crap what have I done
Don't worry I'm not on lower tiers to seal club dudes
Why are you in lower tiers?
lol, I personally rarely go below tier 7, tier 7-9 are fun, 6 occasionally.
But ocasionally we all enjoy grabbing some low tier to joy ride
I find low tiers stressful and boring
@viral lodge same, 7-10
Lowest I stoop is 6. Below that is just brainless play, bashing together cold lumps of steel with handguns
lol
Welp brainless play is tiers 1-10 lol
What's better, wz 111 or 112-2
112-2 by far
The better comparison is 252u vs WZ-112-2
Yep
Right now I have:
t110e5
e100
leopard 1
jagdpanzer e100
wz121
what should I go for next
Im thinking of either the american missiles or a russian or the fv215b line
Get an is7 or is4 268 also good
please no missiles
I mean 215B is kinda in a not so good spot rn
From what I heard, it's basically an e5 with better fire power but less hp
Yeah 215B got passively nerfed
IS-4/7 line it is
I'd say go for IS7 first, IS4 second - you will get modules from IS7 line that can be skipped on IS4 line
IS-4 if you want comp (Im assuming they have/can get FXP)
Im going IS7 for the modules on the IS4
Is7 easier grind is4 better tank
misses one shot in the is8
-4000000 credits after battle
bought the IS
I'm currently grinding the SU-122-54, have to say it's such a great tank, god
I think I will enjoy the Obj. 263 more than any tank in the game tbh - I'll just need to get used to the depression mixed with rear mounted gun
IS surprisingly isn't that bad
Stock tank? Nice win considering if it's stock!
IS is either you love it or hate it normally.
IS was my first line I went for back when I was a noob lol, you know how everyone just recommends to "get is7" first
I remember I used to hate the inaccurate guns and their long reloads, I just ran the idiot gun on the IS lol
My god, I just remembered some long lost memories... I used to run the 100mm on the IS-3 as well LMAO
Oh boy, good old newb days
I also ran the IS with the 100mm back then, because I did as well hate the inaccuracy of the 122:D
It was my 2nd line, and due to the centurion line being my first ever line, the long reload and unreliable gun handling struck me like a train :D
Oh god, you literally had 2 opposite sides
Slow & heavy hitters and small pea shooters rofl
Real pros start on the challenger line
FV4005 was my first T10 lol
@wary saffron i had it partially maxed out before
Also I changed my mind about the IS
the gun handling makes me wanna throw a brick at someone's window
lol
Fv215b was my first tier ten. Absolutely butchered the stats in that thing, I have 2k battles in it, so now its tedious to get my average damage higher on it lol
30 day matters more dw
Is the T34 a good heavy?
kinda yes
It is very good
Yes, its good tank for me
E 50 B leaked
How to play IS5? I'm good on it, doing 3k DMG many battles, but keeps losing despite my efforts...
Is this true or is it a hoax? Found this on Mad Gamer’s Chanel.
On PC this line exists. I think Progetto was just the beginning.
Kranvagn and STRV 103B are awesome!!!
Is the centurion worth going for?
It's not that great and could use a buff but is still good
It just has a particular style
@high aspen it's a hoax, that same picture has been "leaked" before and debunked
Even the dev's said they aren't adding the swedish tds
I really hate the at 7 it’s slow and most importantly the hatch oh god the hatch. The hatch makes the armor useless as everyone can pen it. WG should just remove it as a weak spot. The tank is already slow as it is
While I'm ok with them buffing it I really don't want them to entirely remove it
Like it’s slow a I think it’s the least they can do for at 7 and maybe the at 8 or switch them or remove them
chimera is so op... time to nerf it bois
Yeah its definitely op totally wont stop me from playing it
But it needs a trurret armour nerf and probably mobility nerf?
nerf all that and give it atgms
Does a premium tank require a garage slot or does it come with one?
So you can’t pull a premium tank from container if you don’t have a garage slot?
no one has done it so I guess so
Oh
How do you fight a wz120-1g FT? It has OP armour if its lfg is hidden, I can't cod it because it has light tank traverse speed, I can't brawl it because it has over 3000 DPM.... what do I do
Find a friend and hit it from both sides. If all your teammates are dead or busy, play passively or enage other targets. You can also attempt to rush it and get to its sides if you need to just beware the quick turning.
You can also switch to pramo as most with cas can pen it but ashetzer said if your near an ally as you should be you can hit from several angles
Hello, Should i get the Thunder or T95E2 or Buy Chinese invasion crate pls help me make decision. Sorry for bad English
Get neither
^
Hello guy, is grinding Hetzer for Stug 3 worth it?
And is the L/43 better for it or the L/48 (hetzer), cause ive heard the L/48 is a kinda a derp gun , and im more like a sniper
The 10,5cm gun has been removed ages ago.
then whats the 2nd gun for hetzer?
It has not got a second gun.
Is the su-122-44 the best dpm tank?
Is there any better or not
For tier 7? Kinda average I think
ISU-122S is kinda the same gun but with around 600 more DPM
Or if you're looking for tech tree tanks, Jagdpanther with 8,8cm Pak 43 L/71
Then i am gonna buy the jagdpanther
And thanks for the help
Or if you're looking across all tiers, SU-122-54 for true highest DPM - only beat by Tortoise with HESH, but penetration-wise it's safer to stick with SU
@solid gate if I may recommend, get yourself a Jagdpanzer IV - that thing is a proper monster and it's not that hard to get since it's tier 6
I want to have jagdpazer e100 and for that i have to have jagdpanzer IV and jagdpanther too
Jagdpanzer E100 is a proper monster too, but pretty slow and the current meta favors faster tanks a bit more
@solid gate use the 105mm on the jagdpanther
@zealous anchor
STB-1 Are Good?
Stb 1 is one of the best mediums @rotund forum
Can U Tell Me About Another Best MT On WOTB, @tulip edge
E 50 M imo
@solid gate ?
Oh wait dammit its u I never knew
@rotund forum the e8
Wg pls add atgm to kpfpz 70 irl it has atgms and it was included in the missile testing event which was all about tanks with missiles
-give thumbs up if u agree
@ashen monolith no more cancer in game please
There are already the T92E1 and the Sheridan, if we start implementing ATGM on all the tanks that had ATGM in real life, the game will become War Robots.
Though atgms are a terrible game mechanic, it will take a lot more than that to turn this game into the dumpster fire war robots is.
other than that
i think the euro line deserves a bit more attention doesn't it?
Wg pls add atgm to kpfpz 70 irl it has atgms and it was included in the missile testing event which was all about tanks with missiles
-give thumbs up if u agree
Most of the People disagree, and hate it & Wargaming doesn’t care, so it‘s not going to happen
id the stug the best td for its tier?
yes
thanks, im grinding hetzer for it
Tank you WG for the giveaway opportunity
Thanks to WG for the giveaway opportunity
I’m confused was the scavenger a VI tank since it’s has too much amour he was the only one in enemy team and we only had like a t1 heavy that’s really unfair the scavenger has too much amour but a lot of power hits
scavenger doesn't have that much armor it just has a weird profile
But I could not even shoot it’s sides some how
depends what tank you are using
the side is only 45mm plate so idk how you couldnt pen
Is T30 worthy ? , i have a T34 , but i dont like to play it much , its too slow , only good things is gun and turret armor . After watching some youtube video im little confused
Well, play style.
T30 is great, the 155mm gun turns it into a monster
Many people does great in German super Heavys, others play on russian Heavys wich fits their style. Some play American tanks and it's perfect for them
It can be played like a psuedo heavy
Well, only get the tank if you like the play style. If you don't like, and try to play the tank, u will be in pain, cause hardly you will learn how to play it.
I love the T34, it's awesome for me, but russian tanks for me are a serious pain. On is5 i perform badly...
I have 58% on T34 with 1950 avg dmg 100 battles , but on Lowe ihave 67% WR and 2130avg dmg with 400 battles
Wait holup there was a giveaway??!?!!!?
?
[T95]Charlie9868#0067 was softbanned
Which server has the most unskilled players?
NA
prolly NA
But we got some really good players. Super unicums, 70% winrate more.
What about asia server?
NA i think spends the most out of any server
If you plan on going down the T30 line the E4 will be quite different compared to the T30. The T30 has 10 degrees of depression while the E4 only has a pathetic 6 degrees.
Just stay with the t30 its a great tank
Played both but t30 is in my opinion better...
Definitely.
leopard tier 5 needs a massive penetration buff
not with the amount of alpha it packs
^ And with its great mobility
and with great mobility comes great flanking and manoeuvrability
And no requirement for great pen
And it's OK armor for tier 5
and didn’t the MT-25 have a similar gun (or does it still have it?)
@lyric copper no, mt only has one shell per shot... yea that makes sense i think
1 shell per shot, 4 shots 57mm magazine
oh wait that was on PC, my mistake
should I pick the KV-2 or the KV-1S?
Kv-1s
I guess so. I like the derp in the KV-2 but I dont like the rest of the tech tree, like the KV-3
IS's are way better
agreed
Tks for giving you opinion @gentle wasp ^^
@willow bane anytime :)
is T95E2 worth buying?
offer is good
tank is bad
0-10 scale, how much is it?
price is an 8, tank is a 3
kay, thanks to both of u
ofc
Good offer, but still not buying it lol
It sucks the tank is bad. I want more medium tanks for my collection
Everytime I shoot one, I always damage its ammorack. I imagine its very frustrating to drive.
Unless you started with the Russian medium/Leopard PTA to which your ammo rack is always the first to die
hey is it me or is the 121 surprisingly affordable to run
Why maus 9 is so good🤔 like a boss
mauschen?
Is the t7 French td good???
Which one is better SU-152 or SU-100M1 ?
I think su 152
I did research them both but idk which one to buy
I think su 152 is better because gun is definetly more better and i think it can bounce shots decently
I will buy SU-152 then
Thanks for the help
I get the su-152 in the last week, and you will have quite a fun time with it
Its just cool the massive derp dmg
merkava
What about it @weary cypress
Will they add it into the game such as the Magnach/M48-M60 patton or Shot da Dalet
Idk but isn’t m48 already in?
fun fact: Jg Pz IV has almost the same dpm as vickers light
Is that good or bad @tulip sundial ? Lol
well, Jg Pz IV is a tier 6, and vickers light is a tier 10 @solid gate
Should I get amx 13 75, 43 ter, or Comet?
After the vault I'll have enough to get one
none of the lines are that great
13 75 is your best bet
AMX 13 Lines is great, trust me
Meanwhile after i already bought menacing for full price
Any tips for the t32 American heavy
Hull down. Great turret. Always hide the Hull armor. Also it's does not have a great pen, so take a few Gold shells.
Should I use rammer or calibrated shells and thanks for the tips
for what tank
T32.
CS
Ok thx
@nocturne sage Rammer
Ok
@lyric oriole @hasty hill not even worth getting ready for British lights?
I had free exp ready so yeah...
I didn't even need to grind in Comet, I had plenty exp enough. But for now i would suggest AMX 13 lines because it's suited my playstyle
You know what gets me in WoT Blitz? How a long barrel gun has less dpm than a short barrel gun. Makes no sense.
@solid gate Depends on Caliber, not barrel length, sometimes, both, in WoTb
good example is the Black Prince's 17-pdr, it has around 3000 DPM, more than SU-152
Another example is the E 50's L/100 gun, longest gun than any tier 9 I believe, features more DPM than some other tanks in its tier
should i continuing the bat chat line?
@green moth how do you get the discount on KV2 leg camo or is that random?
I have a question who well can a tiger (p) perform against tier VIII?
oh well light british tanks is then
Eh I should probably go Brit lights, the bat chat line isn't my playstyle. I feel like the vickers line will play like a tiny high speed hellcat, which I was really good at
should i skip the crusader
It's fine when it's upgraded
I decided to get firefly (for historical training rooms) but it doesn't even matter, both lead to comet
With the vault I can skip that tho
so cromwell or firefly
Doesn't matter. I've enjoyed playing firefly but crom is probably a better crusader
i feel i wouldn't do much on firefly
Oh but idk if any modules carry over into comet
i have 36k of free xp
I checked, Cromwell modules are the stock comet so it really doesn't matter lol
I play a lot Russian so I'm used to no gun depression but if you have that much xp you'll be fine
a certificate for 28k and ones you got in that event
For t62a you should run calibrated shells like in the t54?
Give kv-2 autoreloader
Bruh
Autoreloader but it gets 50 alpha per shot with 3 shells in magazine 😂
I sent a German kv2 in #blitz-memes a few days ago but that premium will get the autoloader
@tough dune nonono. Same durp gun. Just make it autoreloader
#cursed-images
Lmao if we had one it'd go there
For now, were just discussing this vehicle
Nah. Ima listen to my muusic and nvm what I just saw and ima go bleach my eyes real quick. Brb
The vindicator should have an auto canon since it does in fact have an automatic ammunition loader and Storage magazine, that thing is not loaded by hand
The vindicator should also be able to rival the 183 in alpha but they took quite a few liberties for the interest of the game
The vindicator should also be able to rival the 183 in alpha but they took quite a few liberties for the interest of the game
@tulip sail
what’s a 183
It's the td with the highest alpha in the game
It's the td with the highest alpha in the game
@tulip sail
Ah the you mean the British death star I see,
but I do agree with you it be pretty cool since the tank is from the 41st millennium and I’ve read in the Lore it’s that powerful
Tbh not really a lot of war hammer 40k stuff annoy me do to it's insane impracticality and general "overpoweredness" but that's just my thoughts on it
idk why
But I feel like Tortoise is just a sad tank
Like it has nothing, except dpm
you can't really camp, since you dont have the speed to get into position fast enough
you can't go frontline, sine the armor sucks, even against tier 8 tanks
also it's so team based
Well, it's a kind of tank you have to play in platoon. Also, u need to angle tortoise armor all time. And medium distances. Nor Camp nor frontline. Behind Heavys should work.
T54E1
anybody dat oredi owns the m41 90 do u know if the twister camo can b bought for gold?
its 1.4k gold for it
noice
tq
Once again, ferdi gang rises over the jpan gang
Cmon jpan, I thought y’all were supposed to be superior
@raven jacinth Well I’m talking more about Rhm and Waffentrager having less dpm on the lower alpha smaller caliber yet longer guns. Yeah the short barrel guns have bigger alpha but that doesn’t mean they should have the higher dpm. They have a longer reload for a reason. Pack a bigger punch per shot.
@tame jungle JPanther II just doesn’t have what it takes. Same gun, about same dpm, but worse armor. Not that the Ferdi is a frontline bounce machine. Far from it. But JP II is harder to play in my opinion.
@tame jungle once again leopard 1 and E50M effect both are good one needs more skill you gonna keep walking into that or something
I feel like that's because ho-ri, jp2, and amx 48 aren't carry tanks; you either contribute nicely to a good team or go down with a horrible one
I know this is off topic but does anybody know what premiums are upcoming to the store that way I can save gold?
@tame jungle it’s cuz those stats are taken from the CIS server, and they shoot a lot less gold there
the tiny kpfpz that you buy before realizing it's a light is here
@wise moth Is that a good or a bad thing?
People are mad that the ferdinand beats their precious little jpan, looks like that extra speed means nothing if it loses more 😎
It’s ok though, they just gotta sit down and play the ferdi to appreciate it
Im quite it just means CIS players dont udnerstand shooting prammo is ok.
@viral lodge It means that tanks with armor have their stats boosted. On NA and EU, tanks like Ferdinand get buttered a lot more because people load the gold and just slice right through, but on CIS, Ferdinand is more like an E3 since people are shooting less gold at it
lol so basically CIS people are prammo haters
@viral lodge nah, they are just morons
I think it’s more they know how to rely on standard ammo and not just load all prammo
The fact that Ferd has such a high WR they dont lol, I dont spam prammo but im smart enough to switch to it when I know I cant pen without bleeding.
But you’d think a tank like the jpan, (a tank I’ve heard great things about here so it should clearly win more) would do even better in a server like that
The Jpn TDs have decent armour but all tanks can AP pen them way easier. Ferd is like the Tiger II tbh.
Im not saying Ferd is bad, it does great, but its largely an anti newbie tank since prammo can pen it pretty easilly. (Like the Tiger II)
best tier 5 premium tank?
Clubber
Nightmare is a collector but very strong.
Angry Connor
aaand their cost too please
One does not simply get these
@wise moth You don’t need gold to pen a Ferdinand though. The upper hull plate can be penned with Tiger II AP rounds even when it has the high ground. I’ve done it. JP II though has even worse hull armor despite the fact it is sloped while Ferdinand’s isn’t.
@solid gate Yeah, but tier VIII meds, and basically all tier VIIs will struggle against Ferdinand with only standard ammo, and even tier VIII heavies, if shooting an angled Ferdinand from a distance will also struggle
Not saying Ferdi is better than JP2, just saying that it will appear way stronger than it really is when people don’t spam gold at it
Only mediums and lights (or tier 7s) may need prammo to pen a Ferdinand. And often the Ferdinand doesn’t see tier 7. In fact more likely to go against tier 9.
Well I know how to deal with a Ferdinand without shooting gold. It can be a slight struggle when the Ferdinand player is good and all but even a medium can deal with it without firing the prammo. Of course JP II is even worse on the hull armor as I said. Faster sure but not quick enough on the traverse to not get flanked. JP II is faster to traverse than Ferdinand but it’s no StuG III or something like that.
well thats a lie
Honestly I praise the RU server players for not using stinking premium ammo. We could argue it all day but my view is premium ammo lessens skill required. The only skill in using premium ammo is knowing when to use it. But using only AP or using AP and HE makes you have to work even harder to make your shots hit the right places and count. Premium ammo is also expensive. Not as expensive now as it was back when it did more damage (approximately the same or ever so slightly more than standard ammo) but still expensive. Not everyone can afford to be firing premium ammo. The newbies cannot afford it when grinding up lines. Just another way for them to make people buy premium time and premium tanks (or just keep a high credit coefficient tech tree tank).
k
Prammo might still be kinda pay2win, but it’s not as bad as it used to be, and honestly, game balance is so tuned around prammo that removing it would just destroy the gameplay. Tanks like Maus would just be straight up unstoppable if people couldn’t sling tons of gold at it. Heck, even with people slinging gold at it, it’s still pretty close to unstoppable
6 maus’ driving down the lane with nothing that can pen
Well you can pen a Maus with standard ammo but it is difficult. The frontal weakness is small and flanking it can be hard if there are other targets around. Still it’s not impossible to pen a Maus with standard ammo. I just wish prammo wasn’t prammo. It makes sense to make it more expensive than standard ammo but it’s like 2 or 3 times more costly. That’s why I hate it. Plus if it doesn’t hit or somehow bounces then you just wasted a bunch of credits. The same amount as if 2 or 3 standard ammo rounds had bounced or missed but with only 1 shot. Times that by a decent number then you’re using a lot of credits. And premium ammo doesn’t guarantee a win though it is semi p2w.
Just got my first ace in the tog ina t8 game xd
My first time getting 7 kills was in a tog. Truly magical meme tank
Tog is merely for the memes. In game it’s a piece of junk unless you have a competent team.
I dont see the point of complaining about premium ammo.. Its a feature of the game, it wont go away and it has a purpose and only using it has its drawbacks.
I think it just takes less skill than using standard ammo as it opens up areas standard ammo cannot pen. If you want to know how to use standard ammo and where to pen with it then you don’t use premium ammo often or even not at all. Plus it’s downside you mentioned is it’s expensive and nowadays it does less damage so spamming it is not a good idea.
Exactly, you pay the alpha price for not wanting to aim
Which brings me to the point of a certain tank that should have kept the old premium ammo damage or rather just needs better standard pen and dpm. The Pershing. That thing is such a joke nowadays. It was always meh but now it’s power creeped to the ground. Only thing worse than it my be STA-1. Centurion I (Mk III) isn’t great for most players either but not because of lack of pen.
Complaining about prammo is a weird way to say that the Pershing needs a buff
To be honest they should pull through the prammo nerf properly and nerf Foch 155 and Ho-Ri prammo
I will always love my Pershing, but it really is getting to the point that Pershing needs a DPM buff. Just buff up the DPM to the same levels as the Indien Panzer, and the gun handling, and it would be fine again IMO
At least the half of t8 meds need a buff now, heavies are way too strong
Or, god forbid, we just nerf tanks
@kindred wren It's too late for that now, WG has already buffed the premiums. (Yes I know that WG can technically nerf premiums, but they'll never do it)
@gentle wasp I wasn’t strictly saying prammo is the main problem with Pershing. It’s not. It’s just one problem with it. The premium ammo has high pen on it but lowers the already meh dpm for that and the tank isn’t even that fast, is big, and has bad armor. 48 kph isn’t really fast. 3rd slowest top speed but I don’t think it really reaches that top speed often.
but you just went from saying prammo is semi p2w to wanting to give it a buff (for pershing at least)
@wise moth Eh that dpm buff will mean nothing if you cannot pen much either. 180mm of pen is crap for an American tank. Somehow the T20 can do well with 160 but Pershing struggles because that 180 pen.
@solid gate 180 pen is enough (and actually more than a lot of tanks, like the Soviets with their 175mm pen), and pen powercreep is really not a good thing
@gentle wasp I think I did poor job there. I’m saying that while prammo sucks because it’s semi p2w the Pershing was always about the prammo. The AP rounds are crap on it.
@solid gate ahh ok that makes more sense. I didn't wrap my head around that well
@wise moth But the T-44 has better speed and all that. Plus it’s a lower down tank. It can work around that weak pen I’m sure. Pershing cannot because of it’s size and bad terrain resistance and blah blah blah.
The thing about pen, is that pen is diametrically opposed to armor. Overall, buffing pen gurantees that there is armor on the other side of the equation that will suffer as a direct result, so you can never really achieve proper balance by changing pen and armor. Other things like DPM, alpha, speed, accuracy, and softer stats you can buff and nerf basically at will while not really having as much of a direct effect on other parts of the game
And it’s not like I haven’t ever played Pershing. It’s always been too average in some areas and completely crap in others. The only tank worse than it I’ve heard is the STA-1. Centurion I is poor only because it’s low alpha and low top speed.
@solid gate Pershing has historically been a solid tank. The mobility is good enough, the DPM was good enough before the introduction of some newer pay2win prems and the heavy buff, the alpha at 225 is solidly average, but Pershing has gun handling tied for best in class, an excellent turret, excellent APCR pen, and the fantastic 10 degrees of gun depression.
All that Pershing really needs is to buff up the DPM to remain competitive in the heavy buff meta, and improve the gun handling to really shine as a true strength, and Pershing will be great again
Eh, I still think Pershing should have a pen buff. It doesn’t need to be major but enough to more easily pen side armor which it struggles to pen with AP unless dead 90 degrees and you won’t always be dead 90 degrees to a tank’s side. I don’t mean it has to be able to pen the front of heavies but definitely the Pershing needs a pen buff. No more than 200mm of pen but definitely more than the 180 it has right now.
I thought the Persh always was outclassed by German guns and Centurion I on the accuracy.
I will always be opposed to a Pershing pen buff, because
A. As a whole, buffing weaknesses makes for much more bland gameplay
B. Pen powercreep especially is really bad for balance
C. 180 is genuinely fine. It pens the sides of tanks no problem, and will pen heavy weakspots frontally, and you'll still have access to the best non-TD prammo pen in the tier if you really don't have the skill to make it work
Of course I haven’t played Pershing in a long time and things have changed since I last played it. I hated it back then so now it would be the last medium I’d pick other than maybe STA-1.
@solid gate Pershing does have less fully aimed accuracy than the Germans and the Cent, but .12/.12 gun handling means it snapshots like a boss for a tier 8 (Indien is .16/1.6, and Cent is .13/.13). IMO a buff to .1/.1, or even .09/.09 would make it really special though
Found the American bulldog to be a hit or miss, either you can sneak off after spotting and leech off of enemies, or you get HE'd by a thirsty SU-152 and then rushed by everybody else in the enemy team
Well the T32 has the same accuracy problem which is something I hate about it. 198mm of pen wouldn’t be bad on that tank if it could hit where you’re shooting. Especially when you have to be turning.
Should I buy the German bull dog (Lek PZ M 41) or save gold for Amx 30 1er prot ?
Really the main problem with the Pershing right now is now that heavies have more HP, and now that there are meds with a lot more firepower, it's just harder and harder to justify the Pershing's DPM. While it used to be livable, it's become a genuine problem for a tank meant to be an all-rounder in that aspect.
Donate it to me is the wise choice @timber pecan
@glad shore M41 Bulldog is tough to play but best with the single shot gun. I’ve seen too many idiots try to use the autoloader and fail to pen some of their shots then get melted while reloading.
@timber pecan 1er is a better but both are really good. more of a playstyle/cost issue there
Gold I get from ads so cost isn't an issue , my play style is usually tanks like Leopard 1 and dracula
Honestly all rounders are dumb in a game where each tank is meant for a specific role depending on it’s type and other factors.
Either one should be fine but I really recommend the Amx (also I don't have the Le Kpf yet) @timber pecan
Pershing doesn’t fill a role. It tries to be everything and fails at it.
@gentle wasp okay thank you
@timber pecan anytime :)
Anyone else with some other opinion ?
@solid gate Pershing is meant to be a tank with no weaknesses, but also having the tough turret/10 degree gun depression combo with typical great American gun handling. The problem now is that it does have a weakness now, which is its DPM, and on a med, having weak DPM is really not a good thing, especially when heavies are super strong
Only an MBT can do everything when it comes to firepower, mobility, and armor. Mediums tried to do that but are less armored than MBTs.
Aren't they basically the same thing in this game (also isn't Cent 1 an MBT)
@solid gate Pershing kinda is an MBT though. Even the Americans couldn't really decide if it was a heavy tank, or a medium tank
@wise moth Man it always had weaknesses before that. It’s a bit sluggish on certain terrains and the universe forbid a Russian heavy gets after it. Also that pen is crappy against the fronts of some other mediums tanks not to mention any heavies. Also only the gun mantlet has armor. The rest is useless.
Its armour works great for what its ment to counter
It was kinda a precursor to MBT I guess but it didn’t have spaced armor much less composite armor. Stack Persh against an MBT it won’t hold up as an all rounder. The reason they couldn’t decide the class was because of the weight I think. It was pretty heavy for what they thought for a medium at the time.
@gentle wasp I’ve seen Centurion called MBT, Universal Tank, and then someone on TE discord said no it was a Heavy Cruiser. I don’t think anybody knows what to call the thing.
The problem is that the mediums on all tiers are balanced by having low penetration and high dpm values, which is not the case for the T8 meds, they lack both
@solid gate It's not really that sluggish, and is in line or faster than a lot of tanks like Indien Panzer, 59 patton, Cent 1, STA, etc... Overall, it's mobility is still pretty much middle of the pack.
And the hull, while obviously pretty soft, can pull some miracle bounces, and is HE proof. But when it comes to hull armor, who cares? Turret armor is all that really matters.
Honestly the German mediums have high pen. Indien Panzer has 212mm and Cent has 226. Panther II has 203. Pershing and T-44 are the ones with low pen.
@wise moth 59 Patton? Really? That’s a premium and a fake. TE even made an article about it and why it wouldn’t work.
Even the British called it a heavy cruiser mbt and universal tank it all depends and it gets even worse when you look at other nations who used it
@solid gate so? It's in the game
Honestly I’d rather just say Centurion is the MBT Precursor and be done with it.
@tulip sail Well we all know why Centurion is slow. The top speed. If the top speed was faster than Pershing’s it’d run rings around the Pershing.
@solid gate All of the Soviets have 175, the Chinese have 180 like the Pershing, T26E4 used to have 170, T69 also has 170, and the only tanks that used to have that high pen was the Centurion, and the Germans with their 200-210 pen. The problem is that buffs to tanks like the T26E4, and the newer tanks like the Italians, premium French meds, Defender mk1, etc... that have really pushed up the average medium pen to be way higher than it should be
STA-1 I don’t know why is slow. It has even worse armor than even the Pershing so that makes no sense.
It has an enormous cupola aswell
@hollow belfry The cupola doesn't really matter when the entire tank is a weakspot lol
@wise moth Well you have a point. Though T-34-2 actually has 181 with the 100mm as it’s highest standard pen. Why T-44 has 175mm I don’t know.
Having a cupola or not having can make a difference. The cupola is just so huge. No cupola could make it harder to hit when hulldown.
Also I did poor on my words I guess. When I meant was what that one guy said it right. Tier 8 mediums are all over the place with pen values and dpm.
@hollow belfry That’s Type 61. STA-1 doesn’t have the cupola or it’s not as big.
What really ought to happen is that all these newew high pen mediums should have their pen reduced, but as long as WG doesn't do that, the next best thing is to just not to make the problem worse by buffing the pen on everything else.
I’m not asking for a pen buff on everything else. Just the Pershing.
T-34-2 is fine as it’s a low slung tank that can get under guns of heavies that have crappy gun depression. It can also potentially flank unaware TDs. T-44 is similar deal though might be a bit bigger.
STA’s cupola isn’t that small tbh
STA-1 just needs a mobility buff to counter than lack of armor.
Although, now that I scroll through the list, honestly, it's not that bad. Lots of tanks have 180. The Chinese, the progetto 46, T95E2, 59 Patton all have 180, and a lot also have 170-190. It's really just the French, British, and Germans that have big 210mm+ pen, as well as the STA-1
@hollow belfry Still smaller than Type 61’s. Both should have them removed since the entire tank is a weakness. May not be historically accurate without them but it’d be for balance purposes. Make them smaller targets to whatever degrees.
@wise moth But why do tier 8 mediums in the tech tree always feel like the worst mediums in the game?
Good god the 155s cupola is the most dam annoying thing ever
7 heat pen failures in a row on it all in the same center
Then git gud@solid gate
Tier 8 meds on the whole have been somewhat meh. It's just the premiums accentuate the problem since a lot of the premium meds are standouts, like Lorraine 40t, Defender mk1, and Revalorise, and historically Mod 1 and Type 59
Granted there are some pretty terrible tier 7 mediums in my opinion. Comet is one. It has a little bit of armor if you use full gun depression I guess but it has to poke too often to shoot and it’s pen is one of the lowest at it’s tier.
Tier 7 has done a complete 180 though. Tier 7 used to be super medium meta, like Comet and T-43 were all the rage, and then Drac and Rudy and Type 62, although now, with constant buffs to heavies, and new premiums, the balance has completely shifted lol
I really despise the heavy meta
I guess that’s true. T29 has become annoying to deal with when you cannot flank it because you’re in a TD or you have no free way too because of other opponents. I don’t know why they buffed it’s hull armor. Now T29 doesn’t even need to hull down. Just drive straight at the enemy and bounce a ton.
The only part of heavy meta I like is Maus buff. At other tiers that were already heavy oriented, like tier 8, the heavy buffs have completely wrecked the game balance
And yeah, T29 is completely busted. It was already a really good tank (albeit a little bit forgotten due to its age), but now with the constant buffs it's a monster, and people are seeing it for what it truly is. First it was the mobility/traverse buff, then the new consumables, then the hull armor buff, and now the extra HP
Well for WZ-110 I think the HP buff was good. Keeps it alive longer. It’s not easy to just point a pike nose straight at an opponent and even then with that the tank it doesn’t always bounce.
The heavy meta really doesn’t introduce anything fun to the game
110 was already really good IMO. I admittedly haven't played it in a while, but that thing is like my best tier 8 heavy with over 40 battles
@solid gate Maus is pretty fun tho. It's pretty entertaining to be able to just hold the W key and laugh as you roll over things
But was it fun for every game to be all about the mediums wrecking heavies then seeing who could outdpm each other?
I’m stacking up exp for the WZ-111 1-4, and the 110 is a really enjoyable drive
Coincidence? I think no
@wise moth I’ve Aced it already though I’m not great with it. Aced it on my most hated map, New Bay. Got 5 kills.
@wise moth maus is the only one I find to be ok with the buff it’s still pretty fun to face off
The original medium meta was super, super unfun honestly. That's what old Blitz used to be. People would just drive their super OP Soviet mediums to like the one relevant hulldown spot on the map, then just hulldown brawl, and whoever had the higher mechanical skill won.
IMO, the best meta, was right before the heavy tank buff. That was the point when WG had essentially achieved a near perfect balance between the classes, and it's evident in their balance charts. All the classes had about the same WR's and damage per battle, and anecdotally, there was a pretty solid blend of meds, heavies, and TDs in both pubs and comps
I’ll tell you what heavy has the worst pike nose. WZ-111. It’s angling is too shallow both ways and the base thickness is crap.
To be honest it was just a uniform soup before the heavy buff
Imbalance is interesting, there is no way around it
@kindred wren That's what balance looks like. Of course I would always argue for more specialization, but I mean, it was better than the original hulldown medium meta, and then the so-called "TD meta" after that, and now the heavy meta
When each class has it's place in the game, that's generally a good thing IMO
Positive don't remind me of the medium meta when the first line I ground out was a turretless tank Destroyer
Although I do agree that imbalance is necessary for a game to be interesting. The ideal for a game is when almost everything feels OP
When was this hull down medium meta a thing?
@solid gate First 2-3 years of Blitz's existence. The usual end point is considered to be the 2-3 period when WG slammed tier 10 med penetration, nerfed prammo, and also nerfed the turrets on Soviet meds
To be honest i think that the TD meta was the worst because all the camping, but to get back on topic about balance: Yes the pre-heavy meta was the most balanced meta, but also the most boring if you ask me. I lost interest in the game because I essentially just went to the same spot on a specific map and it just didn't matter which tank I was in.
The heavy heavy dominance now makes me rethink my strategies and I actually like that. I some time ago proposed a changing meta, and now after the heavy buff I am actually even more in favour of that thing
The Penetration for meds was insane, I think it was something like 270 for some of the higher end mediums
Ah. Well I made my first account back in 2015 at least. I know I started before I graduated high school and I graduated in 2015.
(Changing meta is a balancing strategy that makes a couple of playable items op for a while and changes like every quarter of a year what is op)
@solid gate Yeah, hulldown med meta was a thing when the T-62A and Object 140 had 264mm of APCR pen, 330mm of HEAT pen (which did full damage), and had better turrets than heavy tanks. Ngl, it was pretty awful
Back then all you did in med hunters like the E50 M was literally go for the enemy Russian meds which more often than not secured the win
Yellow HEAT tracers would always be flying around in tier x.
Wow. Well I guess I didn’t see that because I was free to play back then and it took way longer to get up the tiers than it does now. I was above 10k games before I could even get a tier 8 or 9.
E-50M was weak back in the day. It was literally just the tier 9 E-50, but with access to HEAT shells
I will never forget russian meds shooting HEAT at my Grille.
Tbh I'm not a fan of a heavy tank meta.
All it takes is 2-3 Coordinated heavies to push through a line and break with easily.
It's extremely reminiscent of world of Warships legends. There aren't aircraft carriers yet and that lets battleships sit in once place or aggressively push through leaving no purpose at all for cruisers.
The heavy tank meta is just not fun. Battles become standstills and given how mobile heavies are in blitz a medium tank doesn't stand too much of a chance.
E-50M literally had the exact same armor thicknesses as the E-50, the exact same APCR shell, the exact same p/w, and the exact same accuracy, and the exact same DPM. All it got was HEAT shells in exchange for being a tier higher lol
I don't see many standstill battles, and yes, medium tanks don't stand much of a chance in 1 vs 1, but exactly that makes playing mediums interesting
@lyric oriole Probably one reason why T-34-2 is a struggle for me. It’s not a fun medium despite being so low slung.
Either work around them or, if that's not an option for you, join them
@solid gate You should be playing it with the big gun
Honestly mediums without gun depression are harder to work with when so many maps have small to big hills.
@wise moth Uh no. Less dpm, less accuracy (granted faster aim time but blah), less standard pen. Need I go look at anything else that is worse?
It’s not much better than playing T-44 with 122mm except you don’t have that dumb long as heck aim time the T-44-122 has.
My opinion of course but the 100mm is staying. Heck it looks better with it too. Call me stupid or whatever but I’m not changing my mind.
I highly recommend using the 122mm, this tank not only relies on the alpha, but the gun is actually much nicer to play because the bloom is just awful on both guns, but with the 122mm you at least get that aim circle smaller faster
@solid gate The only tangible gain from using the small gun is more DPM, and the 100 doesn't even have good DPM anyway
175mm pen is honestly, not that different from 181 pen. And while you do indeed have better base dispersion, there is one critical thing you have overlooked. the 100mm has the same god awful .22/.22 gun handling that the 122 has. However, the 122 at least gets the godly aim time to compensate.
Moreover, when you do shoot someone, hitting them for 400 is a lot harder than 280 at tier 8, and you get the advantage of having access to HEAT ammunition instead of APCR.
Trust me, the 122 is the way to go on that tank. You're just shooting yourself in the foot with the 100mm
I played both guns and I can without doubt confirm that the 122mm is indeed the gun that makes this tank shine
@wise moth That’s your opinion. I’m not changing it though.
With the 122, you can play a hulldown much more easily by peeking with the tough turret, aiming for that 1s, slamming someone for 400, and then running away with the mobility.
With the 100mm, you'll need a lot more exposure time to aim, and to keep peeking, and the turret is not going to hold up forever
I know it's an opinion, but you're clearly suffering, and being stubborn in an opinion that's making you suffer really isn't wise, especially when the tank is actually pretty fun
Besides a 122mm medium isn’t any more special than a 100mm one when heavies have the same size gun as the medium and some are almost as mobile.
You don't have to believe us. Just try it out for like three games
T-34-2 is one of the fastest tier 8 meds, other than the completely unarmored French ones. Think of it kind of like a T49, but with armor and pen
Well I’m a hypocrite then I guess or am I? Because it’s still a longer reload than something like a Comet and as I said the tank is low slung. The biggest problem is not the guns but the lack of gun depression for me I think.
@solid gate The thing is that the 122 completely changes how the tank gets played. When you need to keep finding angles with the 100 to keep putting out damage, the gun depression is a lot bigger of an issue than it is with the 122, where you need to find much fewer shot opportunities, and can even afford to just take a hit to trade if needed
And I may have struggled with the 100mm so far but I didn’t have full crew so that makes a difference.
I genuinely loved my T-34-2, and it's actually my highest DPB tier 8 med, even more than my beloved Lorraine 40t, and you're honestly missing out on a pretty awesome experience by not running the 122
Why would I pick the 122mm when it can pen less areas? 175mm may not be bad but still less than 181 which means less area of penetrable weak points. I’d rather pen 2 280 shots than bounce 1 400 alpha shot.
Surprisingly enough, it's also my highest average damage tier eight medium tank although i didn't even like it that much (and was already on a decline as far as my skill is concerned)
Of course you’re going to counter argue that a heavy trading 400 into you for 280 into them isn’t a good trade. It’s not but neither is bouncing off them and them still getting that into you. Damage is better than no damage.
6 mm of penetration is literally less than the 5% RNG margin for both guns. I get more mm of extra pen by just installing the calibrated shells. It's not a lot and will help you in very very few cases when you shoot very specific spots
Well still can make a difference in how big a weak point looks on the hit skin.
@solid gate Trust me, but the number of scenarios where that 6mm makes a difference is incredibly minimal. And remember the alpha is important because you're going to need a lot more exposure time with the 100, especially considering that you have the same trash gun handling, but not the godly aim time
It's much better to only have to peek for like 5 shots to be able to deal 2k damage, and only need like 2s of exposure time for each peek, than to have to peek for 7-8 times with the 100 and need like 3-4s of exposure time for each peek
I mean, just try it for some games and if you don't like it you can still go back to the 100mm
^
I don’t know. I’m already on 100k XP on it. Would be almost pointless to try that gun on it now.
@solid gate Well, at one point or another, you're going to have to get used to the big gun, because you'll eventually have to use a similar gun on the 121 where there is no 100mm option
If you don't want to spend your hard earned xp now you can grind the gun on the Chinese IS-2 as well if I'm not mistaken
It's generally recommended to grind the heavies first, since the grind is easier and it will unlock you a few modules for the mediums too
The next tank will be unlocked well before that’d make a difference in the remaining run. Sure the WZ-120 has a 122mm as the best gun but that’s something I’ll have to learn anyway as it won’t be the same as the T-34-2 one. Also I already played Chinese IS-2.
So you do have the gun unlocked?
Now on the WZ-110 as I indicated earlier.
Yeah but I replaced it with 100mm after I bought the tank.
Well, what it will change for you is that you most likely won't struggle as much with the tank anymore
Besides if I wanted to play the 122mm that’s what T-34-3 is for.
Eh. It won’t make that much of a difference. I didn’t say I didn’t struggle with T-34-3 in battles in that thing. T-34-2 with 122mm isn’t going to be much different than that thing.
Anyway WZ-110 is a different kettle of fish. Nice tank but hard to remember not to angle it (because most other heavies rely on angling) and going around corners is a problem for it.
I don't know what you stand to lose, it costs you exactly nothing. May it make your T-34-3 obsolete? Yes, but that thing is already by all means obsolete and a bad tank, unlike the T-34-2 which is a good tank
@solid gate Shouldn't you already have the 122mm from having the 110 researched?
I don’t see how a T-34-2 with 122mm is a good tank. The 122mm makes it look goofy and it’s only advantage over T-34-3 is even smaller size.
The T-34-2's 122 is the 110's stock gun, so there's 0 investment
@wise moth I said I switched the guns after I bought the tank.
Smaller size, more mobility, stronger turret, more HP, and substantially more camo. And the gun has better gun handling (albeit slightly irrelevant since both tanks have god aim time)
How does it have a stronger turret?
Man I wouldn’t want to go back on my word or idea. I decided long before I got the tank I was going to try/run it with the 100mm and had compared both guns.
@solid gate Here's the T-34-2 turret vs. T-34-3 turret vs. T34 AP shells
One of these is quite clearly a much tougher target than the other
Both still have stupid little cupolas which is what seems to get hit the most as far as I know or can tell.
doubt
@solid gate Yeah, but T-34-2's cupolas are a lot smaller, and the overmatchable roof is a much smaller target as well
Well T-34-2 does look stronger in places and yeah it is a smaller turret. Maybe T-34-3 should get a buff? I know it’s a premium but yeah. Not that it should be a lot stronger than T-34-2 after the buff.
Conclusion: stop at the T-34-1 unless you like pain.
Edit: or you really want the 121 for some reason.
@worn swift T-34-2 is really fun though. And 121 is actually good now or something
t-34-2 is stronger in all places, prems should be worse than tech tree tanks
Though for aesthetics side the T-34-3 has a much nicer 122mm gun. T-34-2’s is too short. Kinda like Chinese IS-2’s probably because it’s the same gun?
Ngl though, T-34-3 is a really sexy looking tank
it has russian vibes
@hard nexus I disagree. They shouldn’t be worse but shouldn’t be better either. They’re merely meant to earn more credits.
@solid gate Yeah, but it's better to err on the side of worse than it is to err on the side of better
if they were the same, then there is no point playing the tech tree variant after grinding the tank out
Well but if you make them worse then they die easier and costs can bring that credit earning down to what the tech tree one earns (especially if the tech tree one is enriched) which makes it being premium moot.
having premium tanks that are on par with tech tree tanks still keeps the idea of skipping to high tiers
Well when you say worse you imply so poor there’s no point in it being a premium. Look at Chi-Nu Kai. Granted they made it’s coefficient too high but the tank itself isn’t worth playing so that credit coefficient being that high means nothing.
121 is kinda pointless still. If you're gonna suffer through a bad grind for a tier X medium anyways, best to go for the STB where the suffering is early on and you get through it quicker. 121 has a pretty decent VI and below grind, a great tier VII and then the VIII and IX are torture. STB line, on the other hand, has meh <V's, a pretty bad tier VI, a tier VII that at least has one redeeming feature, and gets good at tier VIII.
Nobody wants to play a tank that sucks. Even if it is a premium.
its not worth playing because
1 it costs your arm if you didnt buy it years ago
2 there are much better premium tanks
And being a masochist, of course I'm going to stop at Chi-Ri and not actually go for the STB-1.
I doubt even those who got it cheap liked it then either. It’s just a Chi-Nu but worse and Chi-Nu isn’t good either.
The Chi-Nu kai is absolutely worth playing because it prints you credits like a printer on steroids
Kai is literally so dumb. At least Bromwell is actually better, regardless of how little better it is. Kai is just a Nu with something wedged under the gun giving it less depression.
the reason chi nu kai is bad, is because wg broke game balance at literally all tiers by introducing broken prems and broken tech tree tanks, because people want better prems, and then some people want better tech trees to fight them
@worn swift I thought the WZ-120 was the bad one because 3 degrees of gun depression. Also it’s WZ-121 not 121. 2 different tanks. Though thankfully I knew what you meant.
@hard nexus Well Chi-Nu is crappy too. It wasn’t ever good category in the first place and I’d say it’s been power creeped hard. So slow and the reload is a bit too long for it.
WZ-120 is the bad one. I absolutely despise that tank. 400 alpha isn't special at tier 9 like it was at tier 8, 3 degrees gun depression is painfully bad, and of course you also need to deal with the painfully bad DPM.
@solid gate Idk why Blitz calls it the WZ-121 when the other platforms call it the 121, same goes for 113
Bad naming 💯. T-34 and T34, anybody? Also, one of the main redeeming features of the Nu is the gun dep allowing you to put the actually decent mantlet to good use. On the Kai? Lol nope.
@wise moth Well FTR’s old article about it says that WZ-121 and 121 are different tanks. Also I think WZ-120 is days is the Industrial Designation of Type 59. Of course it could have been WZ-121 and not 120 but I think it was 120.
@solid gate Idk why Blitz calls it the WZ-121 when the other platforms call it the 121, same goes for 113
@wise moth 113 is because the Glacial, pretty sure there's a prem 121 too.
Glacial is 112
112
@worn swift Glacial is 112, and the premium 121 is called 121b
I think there is both a WZ-121 and a 121 if you believe FTR.
They also mention a (WZ-)111/112 and the 113 though 113 they couldn’t find much on. 131 written on the link in the history section might be a typo.
WZ-120 is the Type 59 from what I remember people saying so the one with the 122mm is probably fake. Still 3 degrees of gun depression is terrible. Should be at least 5 like all the other 122mm guns.
@solid gate Well, if there is a difference, then the one we have is probably the 121, and not the WZ-121. Wikipedia says the WZ-121 is the Type 69, which looks like this
wg said that all maps are balanced for tanks with at least 4 degrees of gd, no?
when did they say that
Yeah, that’s not something I’ve heard
its somewhere some time
@wise moth There might be. FTR was discontinued when it comes to most of the research. The newer articles seem to be like that one about the MBT 70 getting scrapped. OhSlowpoke on TE Discord said he and some who are on that Discord used to work on FTR are are now on TE.
@hard nexus if you could get a source that would be great
@hard nexus Not possible if they added stuff like SU-100M1. That thing has 2 degrees of gun depression. Horrible, horrible gun depression.
@solid gate Horrible gun depression, but 330 HEAT pen memes. It’s like the Jgpz E-100 of tier VII. You can even pen T29 and T34 gun mantlets for fun
@wise moth I guess but it gets ripped apart easily. I kept it but probably won’t play it again ever.
Well WZ-120 could have been later variants of Type 59 called Type 59-II aka WZ-120B and Type 59D/D-I aka WZ-120C.
Uh what the heck is WZ-122? What Wikipedia person pulled that one and where from is my question. Also seems WZ-121 is the Type 69. WZ-120 being the Type 59. 121 is clearly a different tank.
armour equipment or hp thing for e100
HP
@solid gate take it from a hall of famer su100m1 player, the gun depression isnt painful if you just snipe
@broken parcel That’s like telling me to not move an inch. Sniping is not as easy as you claim it to be. Camping would be what I’d end up doing which is just as bad as getting hammered while relocating or whatever else.
Honestly the SU-100M1 is not a good TD in my book. Shall I write a book on tanks I hate in game and why?
painfully bad DPM. The dpm's actually pretty solid. It's on par with the t110e5 @wise moth
In fact most of the tank is pretty solid, but it's a bad tank just because of how garbage it's flexibility is
@solid gate well any tank in the game can snipe as long as you aim. for me thats why i even got in the hall of fame
I got that Sniper Medal in my 121 somehow
@next solstice same i have a sniper tanker in my wz121 for some reason lmao
Ok but effective sniping isn’t easy when teammates don’t let you do your job but keep getting in the dang way. Oh and relocating doesn’t do jack because you either get spotted and hammered or you still don’t have good angles. It’s ridiculous.
Ok but effective sniping isn’t easy when teammates don’t let you do your job but keep getting in the dang way. Oh and relocating doesn’t do jack because you either get spotted and hammered or you still do have good angles. It’s ridiculous.
You don't want to play the Leopard 1 then
@solid gate yeah that happens.
If only teammates would not get in the dang way and try to hog the targets to themselves and get wrecked while doing so. Nobody knows how to be a team in this game most of the time. That’s why Random Battles fail. Feel like a hero when you win? Not really because you either steamroll or get steamrolled. There aren’t many close games.
But really the SU-100M1 is not a tank I enjoy. It’s a joke in my eyes.
Vindicator should have a super high pushing ability compared to other tanks. Let it be the bulldozer it’s meant to be.
@solid gate it seems your trying to be way to close to the front if your running into those issues sniping try keeping a further distance
Honestly I cannot remember what I did with the SU-100M1 and it’s been a long time since I played it. But not a fun tank with these maps and all.
@sturdy bane I agree
Also when it comes to sniping I’ve had both issues of either being too close to the front (like barely behind my team) or being in the spot where obstacles and my teammates are blocking my shots. If the latter is the case moving may come to mind but moving isn’t easy to do. Get caught out in open while relocating the enemy might turn their attention to you.
@sturdy bane That would be good. Not sure why it’s armor is crap.
Id say limit its top speed and up its engine power alot
Have you guys thought about bringing back the original tank lines?
They probably haven't
Hello there. I've an inquiry. I wanna ask your takes on which tank seems better to acquire at this juncture. The choices being the Cent 7/1, Standard B, or AMX 50 120. For context, I've been primarily a medium tank player but has been doing well in the AMX 50 100 - well enough that it's my highest damage average among all my tier 8s. Can only get one for my next tank so I'm in a kind of a pinch which to get first.
Cent 7:1
@agile pendant If you like the 50 100, 50 120 and 50b are more of the same sort of play style
Although, really, the true answer is to do none of them and get the Maus
Cent 7:1
@solid gate Mhmm
@wise moth yeah I kinda do - I think it stems from me liking the Strv 74A2 at T6. btw, LOVE the avid advertisement of the Maus. altho I only have the Jpanther as the highest tier in the German line.
Don’t listen to him 50 120 is p meh rn
Im kinda sad that fv215b is just let down now just bcoz you have to pay for the extra hp, now i cant go tank coz i cant make good trades, now its just "just go med route and go hull down n save all ur hp for the enemy heavies u left on the flank"
its not as to say the fv is a bad tank, no, its just a sad tank,
50 120 is pretty doodoo ngl
a french heavy bouncing me is one of the most frustrating things in the game
What bonus code in asia server
For t62a I should run calibrated?
Why in vehicle discussion...
why not
File a ticket...
Hello everyone
I'm new to the game
I was just wondering which tank I should get since I have enough points for one
Abdülrezzak Banana#7006 was banned
@stuck cedar i highly recommend the Pz IV D, so that you can go down the E-100 line
the E-100 is a Tier 10 heavy tank, and the whole line is excellent. once you get the Tier 6, it’s really solid
Thanks
I guess I'll go for the the Pz IV D then
no
@solid gate F
@edgy dune Yes
Is rhe sheri nerfed in 7.0?
@solid gate Think so.
Aww plz... no
I think it’s getting mobility nerf and a nerf to the missiles. That’s it.
they are just decrease the horsepower 650 to 500-550, if i remember there is the only thing they buff,
Aww plz... no
@solid gate
I have bad news for you, it's worse:
Engine Power of Sheridan decreased: (650 horsepower: BEFORE) to (485 horsepower: AFTER)
Literally 1/3 of it's horsepower gone, acceleration and turning is gonna be slow now
- RIP Sheridan
ATGM Behaviour Changes
Rocket Range decreased from 450 metres to 300 metres
Missiles will have decreased manoeuvrability - Details not specified
Credits: LostKeys#6674 with slight adjustments by myself (range of missiles pre-nerf (450 instead of 350) and grammar)
It is an extract from his summarisation of the 7.0 update stream in #news-discussion
This is great news for tier X. Now we have to completely remove the ATGM, with a buff of the DPM in compensation.
Sheridan wasn’t the issue, and nerfing it that hard is bad, the t92 is the issue
So I was wondering which premium tank is the best to get. I’m thinking about Lowe but I’m not sure if Lowe got nerfed or not.
Premium tanks can't and don't get nerfed...
The lowe is a great credit maker and is a good tank the T34 is a better tank but makes less
@woven stone yes they can and have
They can be nerfed and they have ^^^
Collectors have
Premiums have as well
but not premiums
I guess, BC line is the worst
Wait the T34 is better than the Lowe?
Usually in a match the Lowe does more contribution and dmg than the T34
t34 requires a brain to be better, lowe is just budget tiger 2
I just got into a match with both of the tanks on my team. Lowe did the most and T34 did the 2nd best
T34 doesn’t have front hull armor thats why it requires brain to play
What do you guys think about the Lepkz tank that’s on sale. Is that good?
yes its a bulldog which already is a good tank but better, i don't have the tank but thats what im hearing
not sure about the dpm but its much faster
@swift harness its a good tier 8 premium, worth the gold.
Though I still prefer my ru 251 to it
I've been wanting it a while it's a really good tank
It’s ok, but a lot like the Ru 251
It is a bit different, less gun dep but more alpha and the same HEP
Le Kpf has better soft stats, will be at a higher speed most of the time
Bruh turns out premium tanks doesn’t come with one garage slot and I need to buy one before I get it
most bundles come with one
Wait what I always thought they come with one
Pretty sure if you just buy one off the tech tree it does not include a slot
Oh
Last thing I want to see is that I got Lowe but then it became a bundle and it’s cheaper
yea don't buy lowe straight from the tech tree. Wait for a cheap bundle, they sell it all the time
Alright but It’s probably going to be long before they make a Lowe bundle
or if you can't wait that long they have discounts on the tech tree prems sometimes. maybe for WG birthday
Oh yeah I forgot about that. Sometimes they might include the all 9 equipments slots. The only reason I haven’t gotten Lowe yet is because I don’t want to buy a garage slot for it.
garage slots are pretty common in events and things but yea if you can wait for a little you can get it for very cheap
Anything below t5 is just memes
Youre best off selling it
I think they are asking bc they want to buy it
Yeah but I might just get it since the Großtraktor is like the 2nd memey tank since bob semple claims 1st place
Will wg ever put Ke-ni back in the market?
Großtraktor would be good if it wasn't always everyone's #1 target lmao
Honestly I wouldnt buy Grobtraker unless ur gonna use it occasionally...especially since its HE is useless now because the 5.5 update
Tbh the GroBtraktor isnt that big of a meme it was great for what it was ment for
^^^^^^ It's also more of a light tank in a heavy tank look...armour is useless
Its neither of those it was a medium and of it's time had average armour but in game it's ok though the 75mm offers good alpha
anyone own deacula?
Can I just say, the comet is such a GOOD looking tank I absolutely love it
anyone own deacula?
@kindred bone no, but my first thing to buy is dracula lol
I've got it but I've never played it
Yo guys help me to decide, should I buy lekpz90 (german bulldog 8 tier) or better wait for a discount on kpfpz70?
What's your main?
Uh. Meds I think. Playing mostly meds and TDs. https://www.blitzstars.com/player/eu/saegifu/
BlitzStars presents live player statistics as well as historical player data for World of Tanks: Blitz.
I'd probably say lekpz90 since it's closer to a med style than kpz70
i want to buy a premium tank same style as dracula, u think should i wait for dracula or any recommendations ?
OF 40s should be added at some point in the future.
@kindred bone you'll prob love the amx 1er
AMX CDC is literally a dracula
I doubt they will ever sell dracula again
Dracula has been sold in Christmas events after the initial event where you could have potentially got it for free.
It and Helsing I think will end up there again.
It also shows up on black Friday
Of course they will sell the dracula again. Its a popular tier 7 premium
Smasher pretty popular, it rarely sees the light of the shop
Well ya its the Smasher it was last sold in crates, its the higher average WR tank thats not in testing that im aware of
T23e3 or comet?
Comet
I HATE the k91 clip
I'm at 200 health in my wz111 and we're both hulldown and I get a bounce I'm like "aight nice" and I peak when my reloads almost done bc he exposes himself but he shoots again, and hits me with HE probably because I still had a little health left. He starts moving forward exposing himself fully and I come out to shoot and run but HE SHOOTS AGAIN AND KILLS ME. 3 shots is just unreasonable 😔
wdym 3 shots unreasonable
Not sure you quite understand the autoloading mechanic.
it is a literally heavy with a bad dpm and only does 350 damage on each shot in the clip
you must hate the amx 120 then because it does 400 in a single shot from the clip
@thorn glacier
It actually has decent dpm
@strange thicket It's not bad DPM though, it has more DPM than a Conq lol
Although that aside, autoloaders aren't unreasonable lol
@wise moth oh
didnt realize that
i thought it had bad dpm like other autoloaders
@still briar They have the same base DPM, but Comet can have higher DPM because it gets rammer instead of vents, but if both use calibrated, their DPM is the same
Increasing dpm
Comet also has trollish armor, where the dog is an almost guaranteed penetration
50b or t57 and why
@strange thicket I do tho
@thorn glacier they are reasonable tho
the mechanic exists since so long you just have to learn how to deal with it
k91 reloads in 17s as far as i know
if he played smart enough untill he was fully reloaded then he deserves his win
you could always find a way to deal with it
Was not very obvious as a joke
The "joke" was so bad that even PalractusBeach himself had to delete it
now i hope we can all agree on the Sp 1 c being 1 shotted all the time
lol, ive litterally beat tier 10s with it, you just dont know how to play it
The Chieftain T10 is ruined. cost a lot of money too a year ago. No speed, reduced pen, basically conned.
The chieftain mk6 is a good tier ten. Its a flexible heavy tank, it has ten degrees of gun depression, good hull and turret traverse for a heavy and can go 40 km/h. There is nothing wrong with its mobility. And for me, penetration has never been an issue in the tank because it has great accuracy with high shell velocity as it shoots APCR as standard and premium, and you can confidently snipe weak spots, such as the bar ontop of the E100s turret. Or you can just load the gold for 300mm of apcr penetration and you should be fine.
Much like the fv215b, you shouldnt really be frontlining or putting yourself in positions where you're taking on superheavies frontally anyway. The chieftain works very well as a medium support tank, especially with the HP buff.
Not soon enough
T1 HEAVY is too armored And this is a Tier 5 Tank
T1heavy needs a armor nerf. It is the best tier. 5 tank now. front armor is soo hard to penetrate it needs nerf.(becuz other t5 heavy tanks are nothing to t1 heavy)
Heavy tanks are slow with treason , outmanouvreble to kill , its fine the way it is . T1 heavy is ok , it supposed to be hard to kill (super)heavy tanks in all tiers ,
Progetto has the must clutch and underrated hull for mediums
what a fitting vehicle to have a kolobanov in
Can we add 50cal on the T32 turrent just to make it more handsome
Hey guys any suggestions on wich should be my first td
hetzer
all the others suck in comparison, just name one which sucks less im all ears
@solid gate For your first td line, I'd probably reccommend the russian tds leading up the object 268.
Jpan gettin bear by the amx ac is very funny
@tame jungle LoL especially knowing amx ac is hot garbage
Ferdi gang 💪
Irrelevant to what you said but okay
Enjoy your sluggish flat tank
@solid gate For your first td line, I'd probably reccommend the russian tds leading up the object 268.
@tulip edge oh alright thanks for the help
I could agree with a small buff but if you use your gun dep with your gun arc then it's quite good
Is the wz (Td) good?
They have epic gun depression
It's like the french line and Russian line had a baby
@solid gate do you mean the tech tree line?
It's trash
I mean every line is good if you're good at it though
Yeah the line is pretty bad
Yeah, but in the hands of equally skilled players, it's trash relative to everything else @thorn glacier
Dont worry the t8 premium isn't bad tho
Chinese premiums are good and there are way more of them than I thought
When I played that thing like a year ago it was so broken
Yo, has anyone played the Jagdtiger recently? It feels kinda OP actually
It's always been good, it's just gotten even better with the front armor buff
Granted, I've only played 8 battles in it so far since the buff, but I've managed to win all 8, and post up 4k average damage lol
It’s dpm is crazy lol