#tank-balance-discussion
1 messages · Page 119 of 1
What makes you think that? @twilit crystal
@coarse harness whats your point? Wg should give out tanks in events like that more often.
its not legal rights but people are gonna be mad if they touch the kpf and not even give a proper refund
Thry have no obligation whatsoever to the people that bought it, maybe people should see the 5k gold as a way to get back gold from a tank they dislike
5k gold selling it lmao. I spent like £48 for it. Not gonna sell it though.
You could get the removed tanks for free too and sell them for 26k too.
The point is they could get 15K gold for free if that happens what unicum said
@twilit crystal who says they will touch the kpf?
They making it a collector which means it can be nerfed and in that scenario they should offer the maximum price people paid for it.
What 15? Its 5. Like i said, you could get free gold by buying the removed tech tree tanks and selling them after the update. @coarse harness
@twilit crystal it can be nerfed alreay, WG just dont to keep the playerbase happy
You could get a scavenger or gravedigger and sell it for gold. Same situation. What makes it wrong?
You can sell them, but not for full price
Every can be nerfed, even premiums. Changing the status to collector doesn’t allow WG to nerf it as they were already able to do so
The wotb post fb publification says 5k gold @coarse harness
I was surprised by WG's genoristy with the tech tree tanks but the low tier premium collectors were worth the price they were sold for. The kpf was not sold for 5k gold
Im not saying i trust that post but we are in a discussion where we presume its true.
So what? I guess you have many battles in it... @twilit crystal
You dont see WG refunding every prem theyve sold for the same ammount people bought it for?
@unique scaffold it makes it easier becase people have to option to be compensated. So a collector tank will always be more prone to get a nerf compared to a premium
Nobody said it's fake just @twilit crystal want a full price refund
5K gold is very less for a tank sold for 15k gold though.
Good point here but I don’t think KpfPz 70 will get a nerf. It was already not that good
they never mentioned it was gonna be nerfed when it first came out but now they enplace a nerf policy for it and dont offer the full 15k refund
Oh no, you expected it to stay exactly the same forever?
@coarse harness i say its fake. For what reason would they change it to a collector but not do the same for the other enriched tanks. The only reason i can come up is an event but giving it away as a non-collector didnt cause any problems.
@twilit crystal why do you want a full refund anyway?
It was sold as an enriched tank irc.
Enriched tanks didnt have a nerf policy back then FYI afaik. That was the 1st encirched
WG made all the *new tier 9, 10 prems collector
So thats the reason. They want to cover their bases.
Chieftain Mk6 became collector ?
Not yet😬
If thats the reason, i find the urge to have a 'fair' way to nerf t9 tanks weird when theres tanks like the wz1201gft at one tier lower that wg has no intention to nerf.
You mean they should do the same in T8 where are more prems than tech tree tanks ?
Everyone is asking for a T28 HTC buff so I’ll go with them. Not sure of what to buff though
@coarse harness sure i want t8 to be balanced, who wouldnt? Too bad its just a pipedream.
Though i dont think that by giving a vehicle collector status is going to make it balanced.
121B, M60, Mk6, AMX 30 1st Prot., K-91 collectors soon, I expect, we'll see if WG is coherent
they should make the wz 120 a collector worth a certain amount of gold(prob like 13k) and nerf it
@unique scaffold yes, unless wg just made kpz a collector to make it less of a big deal that they want to be able to nerf it if they have to. I dont think theres a way they couldve made it a rebalanceable enriched vehicle from an enriched vehicle with no such option.
Problem they gonna have is that they selling those tanks ridiculously high. Makin them get even a bigger backlash for whatever they do.
Gone are the days of selling tanks , at 7-9k gold other than the old premiums.
I complained about the wargaming making the predator and vindicator collectible tanks when they had been premiums. Mostly pushback from other players. I warned that they would inevitably do this with higher tier tanks. People claim there is no difference. If there was no difference the change would not be needed. Clearly they have a scheme unknown to us and to me, changing a premium to a collector degrades the tank. No premium tank has ever had a disclaimer that its status as a premium can be changed to a collector tank only that some tanks like the chieftain or 121b can be rebalanced. If people spend money to buy a premium wargaming should not then change their designation to something otherwise.
Totally agreed
Kpfpz received a buff some updates ago, and it was a premium tank. That means if they want to rebalance it, it's surely a nerf they want to do, and I can't tolerate such a thing on a tank which requires good skills to maneuver and is not easy to use as it is now, because of many castrated aspects. With a nerf it would be destroyed. In any case I will not shop any more from wargaming.
I've said this 100 times and I'm sure I'll say it 100 more.
You do not own anything in "your" garage. When you buy a premium, enriched, or collectible tank you are purchasing entertainment. It's no different than going to the movie. It is on you to get your entertainment value from your purchase. What you purchased can be changed at any time. This is part of the EULA that every single one of us agreed to before we started playing.
Will I be bummed if they nerf my favorite premium? Of course, but I knew that was a possibility when I bought them. It is on you to get your money's worth from your purchase.
Sure, but I notice lack of coherence from WG in not converting also other enriched tanks to collector status. At least they should explain why they choose that particular tank, and if they don't do that, that's more a reason to not buy any more from them
I don't own the tank, but there is an implied understanding that if I buy a premium tank, it is a premium tank.
As someone who use to spend a nice amount of money every week, I have not purchased any tanks since the the vindi, predator, and kuro were demoted. Today, I was about to purchase 37k gold to free xp some tanks. But the reemergence of the modus operandi of wargaming has once again deterred me. I hope that they can conclude that people do not want to spend money on premiums only to have them converted to collector tanks. It might be legal, but it is not right.
Seems like they are taking tanks related to events and making those collector tanks
My thinking is WG will have some problems after the update about this thing. With this way to operate, every premium is not sure of mantaining its status. Many Kpfpz owners will think like me and that will have a domino effect for sure
My thinking is worry about nerfs or actual changes when they're announced. No sense driving oneself into paranoia about a storm when the sky is still clear.
I suppose you'd do the same if you bought a premium 20€ tank and then it gets converted to collector status for rebalancing purposes (future nerf, otherwise collector status isn't needed, premium can only be buffed). I just want rules to be clear from the start, not changing when you already gave them money.
think positive. wg is not caring of their buyers, balancing premium tanks and losing entrances for that.
means the game is not dying and doesnt need to do fanbase things
-
The rules haven't changed. They've always been able to change vehicles as they choose.
-
I've spent quite a lot on this game.
Will you tell me then if they change the status of some premium tanks you own this won't disappoint you?
Premium tank means having a tank that only skilled players/buyers can have,and also a tank that can help you a lot in making credite. it shouldn't mean having a super unbalanced tank that is stronger than regular one.
there are some super broken premium tanks.
i would be only a Cow disappointing the balance for that op premium tank only because i own it. balancing means making it fair. not making it useless.
They have and I'm not disappointed
@dim field ok then, fair enough
If they want to nerf/rebalance a tank and I don't agree with the nerf/balance then I'll complain about the nerf/change. Changing the color of my tank and giving me the ability to sell it for gold doesn't bother me
Maybe KPF 70 is a bad tier IX that needs a buff but wg dont want to, so they gave you the chance to sell it.
@unique scaffold do we have a legal right? no but its still a bad move.
@dim field I wish indeed it will be just that. I simply wonder why they had to change the status, if they want to make kpfpz stay as it is
there are plenty of premium tanks turned into collector and they keep ALL the stats.
the b2 is being nerfed fyi
Kv220t lulw
i dont care of the broken seal clubbers' tanks. nerf op tanks = fair.
im sure that kpf 70 doesnt need a nerf. if they nerf it i'll be disappointing because it would be bad, not because "Omf dont touch prem tanks¡!!¡!!"
Kpfpz is far from OP, and needs actually a buff. They should make collector the WZ 120 1G FT instead imo, for a little nerf
wz 120 is also balanced, you need to drive it.
They created a new category and have been filling it with removed tech tree tanks and tanks related to event. I'm unsure as to why some older premium tanks were made to becone collectors as i don't recall them being event related but can't do much about it.
obviusly wz 120 ft is not a bad tank, is a bit better than some other tanks, like MANy other tiers 8.
you cant have all the tanks at the same strongness level. and also that would be boring.
WZ 120 FT is very good against super low pen tiers 8 such as T44, t54 mod1 etc, but against heavies it's armor is like non existent. and has less mobility than su101, worse gun accuracy, and worse gold pen by far.
thats totally why players have 3k dmg per game in a tier 8 yet I was one of the best players in the 50 100 and it got butchered
There should be match making based off of skill
Rating battles?
@tawny cosmos
A. No.
B. Read the pinned messages. This is not the place for MM discussion.
@grave bear about your comment that premium tanks should be for skilled players/buyers.... if that only was true. New players should be grinding low tiers for 2-4K battles after tutorial to learn the game and maps and not get baited into getting smashed in tier 7/8 battle. There should be a cap of battles to be able to drive higher tiers tanks but that would actually imply greater care for player base instead of revenue.
I bought the lowe in a half price sale whem i was at tier 6. I played a couple of games but realised that i wasnt good enough, so i didnt play it for ages. There is no point suggesting putting a cap on buying prems because fistly WG wont do it, and seconly it will hurt players who want to get better but arent great atm
The info button on my Chieftain mk6 implies it’s a premium and not just “enriched”. So why does the recent news call it enriched?
thx wg 😕
Seems like they’re pulling a fast one. It doesn’t need balancing.
Whoops wrong chat my bad
@grave bear are you implying the wz1201gft is somewhat balanced? Because we will all prove you wrong.
^^
@tawny cosmos go to #rating-battles
@lost sinew as i said, prem tanks are for skilled players(that get tanks from events)/ for buyers (that get tanks by paying developers) . i said nothing about skills of players that buy prem tanks.
Premium tanks are for the people who have premium tanks!!!
@dusky oxide i think there are more unbalanced tiers 8. i said it's surely better than the average tier 8, but that's only because public matches are full of bots that get baited by every fast tank with good dpm. wz 120 ft has good armor? you can pen it everywhere with 200mm+ pen, gold or standard, every tier 8 excluding T49 can reach that pen. but yeah, let's nerf it, as Vk 100, just because their strong points are very good against noobs, that are thr majority of the players.
. (with this i'm saying that overall players stats on a specific tank is totally useless)
tanks should be balanced by comparing skilled player vs skilled one, not terrible player vs terrible player
perfect example below ↓↓
take 2 40%ers. for them IS-7 is the best tier X and needs thousands of nerfs, just cause they cant aim and its armor is self-bouncy
then take 2 65%ers. for them IS-7 is probably one of the worst tier X and needs at least a small buff.
Overall tank statistics is the best way to see which tanks need balancing. HOW they should be balanced depends on what WG wants the tank to do.
Where is this place youre talking about where only unicums can roam? Ive never experienced such mode in blitz. And what comes to the wz, it does well against any type of player, just compare it to a su-101. Its the same type of tank but 15% better and on easy mode. No need to struggle with the gun arc or gun depression. The small gap in mobility really wont matter when everything else is far superior. @grave bear
su101 isnt the same as wz 120 ft. please.
exactly.
Youre telling us the two arent similar?
omg! similar shape, similar gun alpha, similar mobilty! = same tank
Both are high alpha t10 guns on a mobile chassis with enough armor to bounce meds.
Oh, you just proved my point, thx
meh.... really?
im done
Whats this more unbalanced t8 that does well in both a less experienced players hands and a unicums ones youre talking about?
Su101 can do more things than wz 120, wz120 can do better the less things it does. fine.
What are these things su-101 can do more of?
umh, it has better accuracy and the highest gold pen at tier 8, it can snipe without problems, also has way better superstructure armor with a trollish gun mantlet
also bit higher alpha dmg
and the best tier 8 tank destroyer mobility
WZ 120 has better dpm and one plated armor, Better than su101's hull but worse than its superstructure, and also has better gun arc/depression.
Higher accuracy wont really matter if you have to aim in for so much longer than on the wz. Wz is a premium so spamming prammo wont hurt it a bit.
I think it speaks for itself.
Im sorry but if you're camping the aiming time doesnt matters.
the thing of prammo spam is meaningledd, please delete that
as i said before, these overall stats are useless.
Why would i delete that? Of course a premium tank owner can apply premium rounds more generously.
Lmao, shooting prammo means doing less damage
if you think spamming prammo can let you win easier, we can stop talking right now
And aiming time always matters. Its not a tank you sit in a bush with all game.
i said, aiming time Doesnt matter when you're sniping. really you cant say it's wrong.
If you think that giving the wz less pen makes it balanced, youre being absurd. It has a way better aim time, 14% more pen and the gun is so much easier to get on target because of the aim arc and gd.
Wargaming should have gave out refunds to everyone and rebalanced the tank , they made a oppsy and they continued to sell the tanks. It's those idiots that are beta testers that keep breaking wargaming rules on testing their tanks and making leaks of the tank so wargaming can't really test out the tank without letting the community know.
my skills let me having no troubles with su101's gun arc. but for 40ers isnt the same, so yeah, unbalanced
What youre saying about aiming time doesnt work in practice. You dont sit in one place for the entirety of a game.
i said for camping, can you read??
you dont have 30 hours aiming time, once you positioned it's ended
WZ is OP. Too high DPM and too trollish armour, you can miss a lot of shots on it..
@grave bear mine either. I like those things about the su because it makes is quirky and once you learn to hide those disadvantages, it does great. Too bad the wz does way better and requires half the effort.
@grave bear are you telling us you only camp in your su?
oh my god
but still I don't wargaming to nerf it. they made it like that and I am ok with that, I don't own the tank, but still I don't like the idea of premium tanks being nerfed. that's not what players bought, they pay for the exact stats the tank has when they buy it
Not a very good strat for such a mobile tank.. @grave bear
so, @dusky oxide easier to play = better? ...
guys is7 is the best tier X 😎 👏 👏
@undone harboryou don't say, that's what I thought, until I discover they probably wanna rebalance my Kpfpz 70 revoking its premium status, and I BOUGHT IT FOR THAT
@grave bear Wz has better armor, ALOT more dpm, better gun handlings all for slightly less pen and mobility. Wz is op. Just like helsing and dracula.
2500 dpm vs 2900 isnt a lot, and the best tier 8 gold pen vs average gold pen isnt slightly
for my Tiger II wz 120 ft is penetrable everywhere, while i need to aim su101 or 'ill hit gun mantlet
@grave bear not only easier to play. The amx m4 is easier to play and better for new players but what the wz offers is something even an experienced player can put to use to the fullest
if wz 120 ft isnt going against meds, its armor is useless
Gold pen isnt really matters since 310 pen is enough in nearly every situtation.
Why would you choose to play the inferior version?
what are u talking about pururut lol
@unique scaffold yeah, I heard that and I am very disappointed as you are. You buy something reading the stats and everything and then wargaming wakes up saying "I want to change it"... this is not fair and if they do that with one of my premiums, I will stop buying for sure
@grave bear You are practically saying "Dont nerf my op tank". Cut it out everyone knows the fact.
@dusky oxide wz 120 ft is useless at long range
@deft owl i dont own wz 120 ft
(tried in a friend's acc)
@grave bear a higher armor value is never useless. Remember youre playing it in public matches, not a unicum battle arena
@grave bear it has the same dispersion, as you can see.
i said it's useless against tanks that have enough pen to go trough it, because it's penetrable everywhere
@dusky oxide load gold shell
yeah totally why a wz 120 ft tried to yolo me in a tier nine medium(60% player too)
@grave bear Let me give you a fun fact. Wz 120-1g ft has better camo values then Rhm.
@grave bear no its not, its a very low profile thats sloped. You can use the terrain to your advantage in a hundred different positions
That thing is nearly invisble and its extremely hard to blind shot it even if you know its location.
What exactly for no? Wz has %1 better camo rating then rhm. I dont care if you dont believe.
ok nerf it to the ground, bye
thats why i said they have different roles. @dusky oxide
You wont always be battling t8 heavies with moderate pen. And it would be dumb to go head-on with them
@grave bear Yeah good luck at nerfing a tier 8 premium.
@grave bear the su and the wz? They only reason have different roles because the wz can do a bunch of sruff the su would struggle with. Thats why its not balanced
....
so what are we suposed to be talking about thats catching a nerf
@grave bear did you even glance at the graph?
wz 120 ft is a tier 8 obj263, Su101 is a tier 8 su122-54(in terms of roles) .
if you say they're the same you're a bit wrong
I say theyre similar, one is just 20% better
oof...
Just because you cant play the other the same way doesnt mean its balanced. What oof?
well umm ima not get in this argument but the su is the only destroyer line ill use
The only way youll play a wz wrong is if you push too far with it.
i own both Lowe and tiger II. Lowe is not even close to be a better in everything tiger II. the mobility and the size matters a lot
@stone vapor i didnt enjoy the t10 but su-101 and 122-54 are my faves.
@grave bear too bad its not the same with an su-101 and a wz.
it is
Wz120 FT is just a turretless medium tank
Oh explain this then :D
umh, im pretty sure that Jg tig 2015 and jg tig 8.8 is the exactly same tank
but they have so much different stats. what an accurate thing you send.
One has the snowstorm camo. They sold it a year ago on new years with that 2015 camo :DD
AMX AC48 and Jpanther II are monsters, but they suck compared to other tier 8 tds, that's wrong.
this thing is just unaccurate af.
The numbers dont lie.
yeah, the numbers in the stats of these tanks dont lie, Wz 120 ft is not doubling the avg dmg of my su101
Su is around 1750 and wz is above 2k @grave bear
Its doing tier 9 dmg numbers mate, the tanks at t8
Vk36.01H needs a buff. Thing is terrible. Can’t compete against heavies, gets out maneuvered by mediums. Give it more armor to justify the slow speed.
@dusky oxide my tiger II has above 2k avg dmg, my su101 has 1900. all my tier 8 prem tanks have less than 1900 excluding lowe.
that means tiger II needs a nerf? Lmao.
@grave bear the point is that youd have 2200 if you had the wz.
Though when looking at balance its good to have a sample of more than 1 players you know.
I have 10 tier 8 tanks over 2k avg dmg -- guess which one is the highest? Hint it is a premium Chinese TD...
My highest damage in tier 8 is apperently my New IS5 does it mean It needs a nerf? Im just joking its russian so expect a buff next update lols
Because strong soviet tanks always receive undeserved buffs... But no such thing as bias right
Russian bias? Lol.
You know something is wrong when half the players that play that tank can get 3k average in it.
Its just too good. The mobility needs to be toned down imo through the speed limit and or the traverse.
At the end of the day you’re a td with 1100 base health. Sure there are tanks that can penetrate you, but from my experience playing it I just target the tanks I know I can bully and avoid tanks head on that dont have much trouble hitting me.
And honestly, if you do get into a head on position your best chance is facehugging then angling the sloped armour even more which works a lot
Even on PC, it’s really strong
@bold dagger ^
eto gg
E3 would definetly need more ammunition. Always run out of one of the shell types.
Uhhh how much gold do you load?
My E4 only has three gold shells 14 AP and 10 HE
15 AP shell is 9600 potencial avg dmg and you have 27 shells🤔
Well, that’s stereotypical american tanking; you get hit, something critical breaks
In my E4, either the turret, engine, or ammorack gets damaged every match
Wow
The long awaited Kpfz buff has arrived
@grave bear Because one is "limited edition" and is less common than the other, the comparison would not be fair
Why do people assume when a tank becomes collector it's going to get nerfed?
Because today is Friday
@wraith lance. Because players like to assume the worst in everything. It's what they do.
Because they nerfed a bunch of the old tech tree tanks when they made them collectors. Unfortunately since then many people immediately think everything that turns into a collector gets nerfed. People don't realize that every tank can be nerfed at any time, they think it's only tech tree and collector tanks.
@unique scaffold btw finally found someone who didnt blame mm but its probably mm. http://forum.wotblitz.com/index.php?/topic/102578-is8-help/
IS8 Help!@#$%^&* - posted in General Discussion: I need to some help with the IS8. I think I may have the distinction of being the worst IS8 driver in the game. 100 battles with a 34% win rate. To win my 100th battle I had to put my tank in a position where the red team...
The toaster was never nerfed
No but tiers 1-4 were rebalanced (lowered alpha and fire rate, increased HP)
Imagine WG removing a punch of low tier seal clubbing guns but not removing the 152 on the kv2
Imagine wg wanting dynamic gameplay so they nerf meds and add new equipment but keep the 183 in the gane
meh, going down from 72% to 62% wr in amx 50 120 in 1 day while carrying all battles and playing like the other 72% battles, but in your team there are always 2 noobs with 0 dmg and all others with 1 average hit, means that the MM is a bit f cked up.
It's called random MM
Sometimes better sometimes worse🤷
The only buff Kpfpz 70 is receiving is the aim time going from 4.2 to 3.9, no reload buff or others... At least it's not getting nerfed, and I hope the switching to collector status doesn't change the 140% credit coefficient
Imagine the British TDs not being so weak.
yeah then more idiots could spam grind the 183
I have just about had it with ghost tanks. WG you need to work on it. It’s shiit. Too many times hit with a hail of shots from moving tanks 100m away.
Just dont get spotted, and when you do take cover
And get better view rang also don't cross the wide open parts of the map when a good portion of the red team are still up
I’ve got 260m view. 3 tanks were moving together 100m away
In my view the problem has got worse.
If they are light tanks and moving behind a bush with the camo net on then u will not see them
I get that. But this was fv183, tortoise and amx
In the open coming over the bridge in castille.
I must be playing a different game. I can count the number of "ghost shells" I've experienced on one hand.
Also ghost shells =/= #tank-balance-discussion
I think he’s talking about « ghost tanks » and not ghost shells. According to what he said the tanks were moving 100 meters away from him but they weren’t spotted
Never experienced this myself though
Not understanding spotting mechanics =/= #tank-balance-discussion
tanks are spotted at 50 meters ,=/= then if you have terrible view range and they're lights behind bushes you wont spot them that far
@grave bear It’s called proxy-spot
Rip my rating grinder
@unique scaffold thanks for that info on the kpz was about to say rip with this image
i dont know on which tank should i get that camo
That camo does not look good on kpfz at all >.>
The camo itself doesn't look good to me, feels a bit too dark.
That’s the single worst looking kpz I’ve ever seen
The ratings camouflage on German tanks don’t look right..except maybe on the 72.01 K
It doesnt look terrible on the waffle tractor
True
the kpf is overall a hella ugly tank with the special camo
Its annoying how the main tanks camo is almost perfect, but around the gun its all scruufy
Kpfz is the most modern looking tank in blitz other than m48 patton and centurion ,I think they still use those models still to this day.
The leos and abrams' wouldnt be what they are if it wasnt for the kpz project. It was ahead of its time and a mean counter to soviet mbts. Along the bc ap its my fav tank at tier 9. And i dont think anything beast its legendary camo but my opinion is biased cause im a finn and its the same camo used on our defence forces leos.
What im wondering though is what wg is going to buff about it since according to my experience it fullfills its role very well.
@unique scaffold where did you find info on the aim time buff? Thats quite a good thing to buff, theyve buffed dispersion and rof earlier and it made the kpz a lot smoother to use. And no, collector status doesnt change credit coefficient, it didnt on other former premiums either. So no worries.
5.9 Open Test @dusky oxide
I see ^^
Is understandable...the Kpfz, T55a and K91, only three tier 9 premium tanks and make supreme stupidity degrading Kpfz as collector, how many people have wasted a lot of money to getting that tank? , a very rare tank in this game moreover
But its getting buffed on 5.9, why are you complaining
A question about to convert a premium tank to collector... The tank loses the hability to grind credits as premium?
No. It retains its credit coefficient
The only change that happens is the name color goes from yellow to blue, you have to use the collector filter instead of premium, and you get gold instead of credits when selling it.
Btw enriched and collectables are the same btw, both have almost the same credit coefficients and both can be buffed or nerfed. Just one is blue and the other is gold like a premium. I personally keeping below tier 8. I got kpfz for free btw.
Yeah it's quite funny seeing people complain the kpf is going a collectable
When it wasn't even a premium
I got it when it was first given out for the rating leaderboards, I do quite like it, and I don’t really care if it’s a premium or collectible.
Same
Just because it's going as a collectable people thinks it automatically gets nerfed
There’s no other tank like it atm I guess. Besides, can’t complain, it’s free, and ikr.
I don't think any collectable tank has been nerfed
Apart from the ones below tier 5, but they were all nerfed, not just the collectibles, so.
Although I didn’t like that, it makes grinding so boring and hard, all the way to tier 5. But I understand why it’s necessary
Toaster stayed the same iirc
@modern rapids luchs was badly nerfed. 😂
@modern rapids yes some collectible tanks have had changes
They’re for lower tier balance. Even the tech tree ones are nerfed too @mental schooner
@shy wren good point but did it really have to get that bad of a nerf? Ive seen a luchs player complain about his little gun.
Well, he didn’t complain about the traverse
Have the 38 nA instead, that thing is so nice
Why does the Kpfz's camo made it look like a used shoe
😂
The ke-ho is also still a fun little tank @shy wren
Bt-Sv speeeeed boat
Yeahh I hope they sell that thing again soon haha
The bt SV and the grobtraktor are the only tanks at the tier with spaced armor that can actually block the Bt7 art HE shell
-ahem- Panzer II J
-ahem- UE 57
SU 100Y is OP, it's too easy to get, so everyone has it. Plus a tier 8 gun in tier 5 matchups sometimes. That's what I call OP
It has a big gun but its balanced by the fact it can be awkward. Big profile unreliable armour and not much health.
Decent mobility though but its russian so ofc lmao
S35 CA is best Tier V Tank
Difference is the 100y can use the alpha on poor tier fives
Is4 needs a huge turret nerf
Nonsense
Do you realize with that nerf the thing will not be a classical russian tank and will be basically useless just because it can easily penned with HEAT/APCR (the premium ammo the tank had) on the hull.
Ue 57 and pz2 J are easy to kill tho ~ ram the ue and go around back of the pz or let your team kill it @hidden frigate @shy wren
PZ2 J is probably the third most OP tank in the game after KE NI OTSU and WZ 120 G FT.
It does not care about MM as also tier 4s will struggle to pen it
yeah but it cant pen tier 4s
@meager spruce tanks with just as hard to pen turrets have a super easy to pen hull like the t34
Hell the is4 is even more mobile than the t34 and can sidescrape better
Pz2j is garbage- half the tanks you see are either unpennable, or you are too slow to flank to hit them where they are. When your team inevitably dies around you, it’s an auto loss or draw.
Pain in a can
the is4 has no turret weakspot anywhere
OH YEAH 400 pen heat can go through the cheeks
I've never once penned or been penned through the front of the turret, it is functionally impossible.
If your a tall tank you can shoot the top of the turret,
I’ve done it before
Maybe this has been brought up before but I am curious, has there been any discussion about enabling preferred match making for the sub tier V collectors? The Valentine II has always had this feature and it has been it’s saving grace. I’m an “Ace Chaser” and while I have gotten most of the sub Vs, a number still evade me. So often due to my high battle count, I’m placed in the bottom tier- often the only bottom tier, and have no ability to rack up the xp that rookies have available to them because I’m too weak to engage. Just a thought.
is4's turret roof is penetrable with heat if is4 is not in hulldown (only by E100 or tanks in a height place) then it has 2 optics that can be penned by any 220+ pen gun, and then this super little flat plate nearly the gun mantlet that can be penned by probably 260 pen or less, but you need pinpoint accuracy
@twilit crystal is4s can pen it
true, also E5 and T57.
maybe also amx 50b if normalization is a thing
Oh yea thats true, is4 has td pen with its prammo :DD
Please change Cruiser Mk.I to have 2-pounder gun and not Pom Pom autoloader. An autoloader with only 2 shots in the clip is more trouble than it’s worth, thanks to poor dispersion and long reload compared to 2-pounder. Thanks.
@fiery turtle Wargaming doesn't care about lower tier changes anymore pretty sure, they wanted to make the game slower paced for new players.
Please change AMX 40 to have stock turret and 45 mm gun. Top turret is ugly as hell, and the big 75 mm gun has such poor dispersion and slow reload that it is not worth having. Thanks.
Please change Pz.Kpfw. III Ausf A to have stock turret and fast-firing 3.7 cm gun. The tank’s very high mobility and low profile makes the 5.0 cm gun and tough turret too much for newbies in Tier II tanks to deal with. Giving it the smaller gun (with higher DPM) will force it to stay out in the open more often, and get hit more often. Thanks.
Having a higher DPM gun would make it easier for more experienced players to fight the new players, using cover to maximize survivability and poking out every few seconds to get off shots.
This guy @fiery turtle is meme material.
Even better
make low tiers playable
man wh0 cares about low tiers anymore they suck
@fiery turtle you gae
WG actually needs to start diffrentiating med and light vs heavy/td view range. Its a disgrace im at 255 -260 meters against an e75 in a batchat and i get spotted after i fire.
then dont fire
The FV215b would be more balanced if it had a legendary camo.
FV215b "Gentleman"
@twilit crystal Agree with you, but not about your example because firing and giving off your location at that distance seems fine
U can pen is4 cheeks my dude @twilit crystal
IS 4 cheeks are very small to hit.
True. But that’s what make is4 a good tank. It doesn’t have leo mobility or 183 alpha...
Dont give them ideas @slim rivet
IS4 is a bit too good imo.
Why would you think so? Just curious lolol @lunar niche
183 is good food for every other tank now
183 is still op
And bunch of noobs always pen u, cos they use FULL AP
And then, i u have big sides, or sides like 140 u dont really mind about that cos u get 1000 dmg as always
Just dont get hit or try and peek a boom it
@distant river easier to say than to do
Yeah, but keeping moving in a med and keeping the 183 spotted isnt too bad
We all know how it works. 183 are generally bad players camping in a corner. They don’t do much damages but sometimes they manage to hit u and ruin ur game. Op tank? No. Cancer tank? Yeah @distant river
Yup sounds about right, especially playing a tank like the WT
If youre uptiered you will cower in the corner until the 183 is spotted
I think, Conqueror must have the Conqueror MK II ABP turret, and must have an armor upgrade, but now it is a piece of crap, and i need to use that crap to get FV215b 😑
hello !
Hi :v
Its obvious nerf the gravedigger and vk100p
Why?
@hardy heron. It isn't obvious
Tbh I think the gravedigger could use a bit of a recoil nerf
@unique scaffold it is. It can take 2-3 t7 tanks all focusing at once to take a gravedigger down. Which is silly especiasly ehen it requires multiple heavies.its clearly op
Sorry what? Just use your higher alpha...
It really isn't. Players inability to flank or aim does not make a tank OP.
Instead of leaening to counter it, people would rather just nerf it.
Take a shot at its lower plate. If it's hulldown and won't let you. Go around to the side or back. Shoot once back to cover wait to reload shoot again. You should out trade it well enough
U are right. I won’t cry about nerfing 183. Now I just want it removed haha @unique scaffold
There are exceptions to every rule. @slim rivet
In my opinion tanks like the 183 and the KV-2 are out of place in blitz.
I couldn’t agree more @unique scaffold
Those two tanks reward unskilled players more than any other tanks in the game. Hide in spawn and land one shot. Then land one more shot before you get rushed and die. There is no skill there. They simply create a stagnant game environment where players are afraid to scout in fear of getting nuked for the majority of their hit points by some windex addict who barely drove out of their spawn point.
@unique scaffold flabk a gravedigger? It will just turn and drive into you
Strange. That doesn't happen to me 🤷♂️
@hardy heron just peek a boom if you can't flank. It can get 2 hits on you max, which is 150 dmg which is nothing
I find the Chi-Ri to be more of a threat than the Gravedigger
@distant river with its armour chances are you won't really boom anything ajd its 500 damage per clip is insane at t7
It has a horrible lower plate, so just aim. And simply dont let it unload its clip in one go
@halcyon dagger lol nice meme
I dont really worry about grave digger unless im in a paper tank 🤷♂️
Who plays tier 7 anyways ?
I love it when one player tells other how to deal with a issue and all they get is arguements in return. 😂
A Grave Digger is a problem if you let it catch you out in the open and if you let it dump a clip into you. If you don't do those things it is a easy kill.
@unique scaffold like people conplaining about a 183. Dont ger caiggt in the open. HE it ti death after its fired gg
Did you just have a stroke? Should I call 911?
Lmao
Um probably should @unique scaffold
@unique scaffold start dialling
Totally on topic
The GD and the 183 aren't even in the same ballpark.
The GD takes a degree of skill to do well in... the 183 does not require nearly the same amount of skill.
But no chance to see it removed, right @unique scaffold ?
I don't work for WG. I have no clue.
I dont work for WG yet*
Didn't WG mention in one of their livestream/interview that they were not removing tanks?
I honestly don't have a issue with the 183... I have a issue with the number in each game. 3 tank destroyers per team is simply too many.
@distant river WG can't afford me.
Professionals have standards...
(about your pay not you not meeting their standards)
6 TDs in every match creates a stagnant unfun environment. I personally think they should be capped at 2 per team.
3 T95s per team
3 TDs and 4 heavies on castilla gives you a very boring game
Or a very fast one. Heavies pushing in the open getting nuked by TDs and red heavies from city.
Just watch the video
Cap every tank type to 2
https://youtu.be/ZewRSG3sU2Y The first clip just shows how op this is. Hes unloaded 1500dmg before taking 2 shots at t7...
Gravedigger, is it really OP So when the gravedigger was first released,I thought it was so OP, having played it a while, my views have kinda changed. Agains...
A good player doing good in a tank?!?! Say it isn't so!
Meadsy even says in the video why it isn't op and what it would take for it to be op
Buff the jagpanzer E100. Worst tank at tier ten IMO
Yes plz buff just cuz I like it, and I think it’s good how it is pretty much.
You know what would be awesome? A KV2 with a 6 shot auto loader I don't care if it takes 2 minutes to reload. XD
Type 61 needs some help plz donate so this poor poor American ripoff can have a home in wot and a buff
@neon peak I despise it, it has no purpose at tier ten and is just a big box of hitpoints waiting to be taken
Yea I’ve heard a lot of people say it is not good and such. Personally I really enjoy playing it for some fun games, being able to do 2 highest average damage per shot is nice and with super good pen, and armour is pretty good I find, mobility it’s terrible but overall fun tank for me to play
xd
Please give the Type 97 Chi-Ha its 57 mm gun back as the stock gun instead of the 37 mm. There’s no good reason why the Tier II Chi-Ni can have this 57 mm gun, but the Tier III Chi-Ha can’t. Thanks.
Please buff chieftain turret to 400mm
Please remove all prem tanks
111TheOneAndOnly111
You planning on giving everyone a refund?
@dim field yes. And who’s going to pay for it?!
Most likely wg or the people who bought em
i find it heavy bias that the grave digger gets 0.66 seconds between shells but the 13 57 has to wait 1 sec
why does a tank with n o armor need to wait 5 seconds while a tank with a lot of armor do it in like 3
It's easier for 13 57 to get back to cover?
again the 13 57 has to expose itself for like 5 seconds while the grave digger can do it for 3 and still bounce
Honestly i don't know
Where does the 5 seconds part comes from exactly? What prevents you from going peek a boom?
it has 90 dmg lol u cant exactly peek a boom using camo reset with that. Again the grave digger has it in 3 seconds. Its a clear example of WG being biased towards idiots in heavies while punishing skilled light tanks
Peek a boom using cover. Stick your gun out, shoot, pull back, repeat.
Here's the stats
Kinda weird to compare them though given one is a light while the other is a heavy but honestly i don't have any experience with the Amx
AMX 13 57 just needs to get it's light tank camo. Gravedigger is a huge tank if your shooting at it, you're not going to miss. Gravedigger is great again tier 7 (a little above average) and 6's (God Like). But once it is bottom tier gravedigger clipping is HP hurting course almost all tanks can do x3 the amount of dmg you do in one shot, if you ever do any trading. I haven't played that tank since I got it, rather play e25, type 62, ruby, t-34-1 or even vindictor. Has way better and more effective premiums to play that are still competitive in tier 8 for the most part except e25 in corridor maps
@dim field he says cos of its low pen. Its got 175 pen on AP which is the sane as a kv3...its op against t7 and t6 judt not against t8 tanks...175 pen is what the t54mod1 has... says nit op ajd demobstrates two 3k plus damage games . No tactics or sidescraping just drives straight into his enemies
Are you talking about the Amx?
M @dim field no gravedigger, sorry ot has 170 pen
Oh from the earlier conversation
Yeah and its lower plate is so small ajd low bythe time you've aimed you probably took more damage than you gave
He says it would be op if it had higher pen. It's fine at tier 7 really strong at tier 6 (except it can still sometimes bounce as seen from the video where he bounces off the side of a tank running away). Can bounce rounds from tier 8 but is usually a big easy target. He got 3k damge from being a good player but at the very beginning he caught some people who weren't even facing him directly which let him rack up some damage.
@dim field yeah only because it would dominate t8 as well. A t7 tank should be playing second fiddle at t8. Hes hardoy even using cover to reload, no sidescraping liyerally drivijg straight at reds just clipping them.ajd bouncing everythijg they throw. Tells me islts a low skill op tank
.
Most the time when i go for the lower plate I'll take almost 2 shots. I'm often a Td or a heavy so most the time the GD will either be unable to pen or I'll have the better positioning (T25 AT aiming down, from the side, or forcing the GD to expose itself)
.
He is using cover, a lot of the time he's either using terrain differences as cover or attacking when the enemy is in bad positioning.
I migt not miss a grave digger but i might not pen
I havent encountered Gravedigger for 2 months
im not talking about it being op. Im just talking about WG's lazy balancing giving everything to idiotic heavy tank players
low skill players play heavy tanks more so the stats are brought down for balancing. Thats why the grave digger takes 3 seconds to unload while the 13 57 takes 5
Hmm
??????????
Only reason to play gravedigger is to play it against tier 7 and tier 6s where it is above average (well lets say above average for the good tanks in tier 7 since it has some stinkers) tech tree and below average for premiums. I aim for engine decks so I can get a fire after every clip. But since I don't play supremacy , I normally have to play against tier 8 tanks which by seeing the amount of premium shells I have to carry would say how many tanks are in the red. I rarely get tier 7 and 6 in the times I get to play this game so I just gave up on this tank >.>
Only reason I still have this tank ticked off is course I haven't mastered it as yet >.> 3.5k dmg is not enough. IF I play supremacy I guess I could since that mode is way to easier to get masteries but I feel sry for those players since I see more players learning to play the game there. Maybe I should play supremacy to get this mastery. Well am off to master this tank now. Thanx for making me convince me, am off to play this tank in suprem and mastery it to finally sell it.
What’s the point of using HE on gravedigger?
I could never figure it out
Tracking maybe
I hate it, that I often have a Match, in that the only high-tiers of my enemy are heavies and TD-Derps. I mean, thats a free-win for them, because the heavies and TD's in my team are
low-tier.
How much does gravedigger sell for?
2k gold
.__.
That tiny plate between the track plate and the main side plate...
still should pen my dude..
what are you even talking about
REEE slowmode is big dumb
At that more angle than that armour inspector says the horizontal pannel has 250mm of armour
Well it should bounce off of that then and hit the flat hull!
Too much energy would have been lost
It won't bounce due to the 3 calibers rule. What likely happened is that due to some lag you actually hit his upper back plate would bounce the shell.
1v4 anyway, cent could finish you ez
its not like wot blitz is meant to be realistic
blitz would be more popular is it was more arcade driven like wows blitz but its too late to change that now xD
if you think you can make a better game thats more popular, youre more than welcome (to try)
Blitz requires strategy and thinking, it is not for everyone. Some people just enjoy running and gunning and something like PUBG is better for those kinds of people.
@smoky yoke your tank is so op.
BogdanM4#1478 has been warned.
Way bot delete image????
@civic oar I warned you for naming and shaming, it’s not allowed, yours is quite explicit
@ivory fractal just the truth
Lol someone wants a ban
@ornate epoch by happy
One game- really nice data set @civic oar
Look at pinned messages..
BogdanM4#1478 was muted
Why is following the rules so hard?
Basic human condition, when told we can't do something we feel like we are getting controlled and so we go and do whatever it was that we couldn't do just to say that you cannot control us
I love philosophy
So if we say "you mustn't respect the rules" we could achieve better results 😂
@unique scaffold because the rules restrict fun
@quartz crown. Change your definition of fun. Problem solved.
@small flame I just stating the obvious, blitz is growing at a very slow amount 13k player NA, 33k Players EU, Russian has 88k players meaning something about this game does not register to other countries that is not Russia ? The grind? the reward system? Or the game play is not effective? I am not sure. But this not a discussion for here and just state, gravedigger is great against tier 7 and 6 but crap against tier 8. @rose sequoia
@unique scaffold well my definition of fun being a furry on non furry servers
speaking of op turrets. the is3 needs a nerf. Im freaking face hugging an is3 in my t34 using gold and i still cant pen
Now why would you face hug an IS3
coz im in a t34. FYI i facehugged in such a position his gun depression couldnt hit my hull. There is no reason his gold should pen a t34 but my gold cant
Learn to aim then
meadsy i was pushing him specifically across a ridge so his gun was facing my turret only
he couldnt touch my hull. Thats how i face hugged him. He penned my turret using gold but my 300 pen gold cant pen the is3 coz they removed turret weakspot on top coz russia. He penned my cheeks . He couldnt see my hatch
@unique scaffold I will OwO and UwU whenever I want
I will OwO and UwU with all my fellow compatriots and I will destroy every non furry player in blitz including you. Prepare for the tunneling of a pony boi rawr <333
Ew what's wrong with you
@quartz crown so.... Good players are going to kill me? Sounds like normal.
@unique scaffold when people call me good haven’t heard that in a while
Srry if i was a little bit aggressive
If there wasnt premiums, you would be paying to get the game, and there qould be a massively smaller playerbase. T28 defender is pretty balenced, especially compared to the T28 proto. And just dodge the 183 or CoD it
lol @ tier 5 battles being good @unique scaffold
Yes? I really enjoy tier 5 battles
@unique scaffold. Cursing is frowned upon here and taking one letter out of the word isn't fooling anyone
Ok :v👌
@unique scaffold Yeah and that's great. I insinuated that they are not good. That doesn't mean you don't or can't enjoy them. It just means they're not good. Do with that as you will.
(-NiloC-)#0590 was muted
How is this balanced? Started this game last night. Never have I ever seen this
Na?
@jolly ermine pinned messages
Yes NA
You guys are too few....
Ok
@unique scaffold "6 TDs in every match creates a stagnant unfun environment. I personally think they should be capped at 2 per team."
Say hello to 10 min waiting per match.
Wannabeunicum#7220 has been warned.
@deft owl 10 minute wait for TD players. Other tanks would be pulled into a match much faster.
Bt7 art is getting engine nerf :/
So anyway RIP sp1c. Its getting nerfed again coz WG hates fast autoloaders. But the jg pz e100 gets a buff -_-
But aim time buff will be nice ig~ I just hope it isn’t much slower to accelerate
Sp1c is getting nerf?? Oof I thought it was buff slightly
Isnt the SP1C getting another shell in its clip?
Is the game gonna do anything with T69 and T54e1?
T54e 1 is great but t69....
Uh plz stop this pay-to-get-fancy-Tanks-and-get-a-t10-easily WG it’s annoying I spend 15 euros a month it’s not enough
Apparently the M41’s gonna have the DPM of a Comet for Update 5.9, but the improved vents it’s gonna hamper it’s DPM on the top gun, so a balancing factor
M41 Bulldog was already a very very good tank....
it will have 3.4 reload time with vents equipped, compared to comet 3.3, but bulldog is 1k times more accurate, has +8 penetration, it's 1k times faster, has light tank camo. gg wg, u just broke again the balance at tier 7. heavies became useless again. buff again heavy tanks now. noobs
The only good purchasable tier x is the 121b
Honestly, all I want is for WG to completely rebalance the Bat Chat as more of a combat medium instead of a scout tank. 4 shell autoloader with 350 alpha and 3.1 seconds between shells, but 26s reload to give it a little less than 2400 base DPM, and take away its light tank camo (and re-designate it as a medium). Then they could add like the AMX 13 105 branching off the Bat Chat AP and give it basically the same stats that Bat Chat currently has as a replacement
You want the tvp when it comes out
Yep. Interclip reload is phenomenal
I'll just be disapposinted in the TVP because it'll basically just be a Bat Chat with faster interclip in exchange for less camo
Unless they redefine the Bat Chat's role on the battlefield, it'll be super stupid
It can easily dump it’s potential 3 shells (If WG sticks with the 3 shell formula) in just 3s, then hide
What can I say
It’s a light tank
We’ve talked about the bat before
It’s not changing anytime soon
sighs
A guy can dream though right?
I still disagree with WG's decision to make the Bat Chats light tanks in the first place, it should have been a medium
What? The bulldog is getting a buff? It's already the best of the tier 7 tech tree lights.
Bulldog has very bad armor.
No armor=best armor
You shouldn't be taking hits in a light tank.
It’s a light tank with very good speed and a decent gun why would it need armor
its a pretty large light tank
Not really
Maybe the tallest but pretty sure Type 62 is larger
And LTTB has a worse gun
i mean its a large tier 7 light. Im not arguing about balance. It overall is an alttb that trades armor for firepower
I love the Dracula but not a fan of the cdc
Recently though I’ve been advised to play it like a tier 8 leopard 1 though
1 thing I don’t understand is why would the Bulldog get a buff and SP 1 C stay untouched?!
Autocorrect hits hard today
And I imagine that changes everything
As I stated you literally cant use the cdc's mobilities coz a t49 will be there in most games. I dont even hate fast tanks. I love the ru251 but the smaller profile with hesh makes it much better
Anyway why did the 13 57 interclip not get buffed to grave digger levels?
The CDC is kind of some Leo 1, big and unarmored but fast and with a powerful gun
the leo has good gun handling and dpm that is actually above its peers and not 0.1 sec better. Leo also gets a few troll bounces
the problem is the cdc's gun handling is absolutely garbage for a tier 8 medium with 225 alpha.
Well Idk about the exact stats, I just enjoy the CDC. But I prefer T49 over it for the fear factor and LT camo
im not saying the t49 is op lol. It just makes the cdc useless in any game where both are present
True it’s annoying when one tunnels you and no one helps
But it’s more of a team problem than a balance problem
Yall really hate the sp1c huh
Since all the nerfs its got, best way to handle spic is acting like it doesn't exist
I remember the old glory days of the sp 1 c lol
Crazy fast autoloader and super fast
@twilit crystal why you upset about the jag buff? It’s not a huge buff and the thing is one of the worst performing tanks at Tier Ten. I don’t really think it will make much of a difference, but sidescraping in it will be easier due to the big gun arc buff
because i dont want more idiots in tier X tds.
As opposed to being idiots in meds?
True, very annoying when there’s a jag sitting in the back
implying they wont continue to sit in the back. When people see td they refuse to do anything but snipe
An idiot player is going to be an idiot player no matter what tank they're in.
Will there be a jageru buff soon?
Yes, nothing huge but a bit of a buff to dispersion and turret arc
I really wanted a buff in terms of mobility for jage100
jag gun arc buff very good
5 km/h more would be awe
4° extra left and right is very good
Easier to sidescrape
When will jageroo buff come out?
A bit of traverse would be helpful but i'll take the 12/12 gun arc. If a med rushes, it can't turn anyway but 12/12 will be helpful to shoot a moving target without turning the hull.
I’m most excited about the gun arc, an extra 4 is pretty nice for the jag and now sidescraping in it will now become effective
Still don’t get the pointless HEAT nerf a while back...I’ve only fired HEAT a couple times in the tank but it still makes no sense...
420 HEAT pen. If that was still in the game, with CS, it’s gonna have 468mm of pen. Which will render all armor save for good spaced armor useless. Sidescraping Mauses are rendered useless
It was nerfed to 380 a while ago
Ik
Is something buffed on Jageru besides gun arc?
Gun arc and gun bloom, that’s all.
That’s nice, really nice
It’ll help it sidescraping
the point of the HEAT nerf was to make sure you couldnt autoaim mauses
But now, most TDs have 400+ pen due to CS.
Or you could not use CS and aim. None of the TD’s except the HESH Monster need it.
If y’all think the CDC is bad currently , I played it two buffs ago... It was worse than awful
CDC is a noice tank I just hate how common it has become
that's why I use my T-34-3 over my Type 59, or my FCM (or Revalorise) over my CDC
I wish I could get the T-34-3 during warriors path but not lucky enough :l
(Type 59)
Not skilled enough lol
I didn't get it for free but I got it with $20 worth of gold, not bad of a deal
And I wasn’t really interested in it I just save for something else.
I don't spend money on the game so i had to make it
100.01P needs a traverse nerf
^^^ it someone has better traverse than the KV-5
even though its getting decimated next patch, it needs more nerfs
it traverses quicker than a KV-4, has stupid alpha damage, still has broken ass armor that cant be penned if youre not driving a high penetrating tank
That's the point of the tank's armor profile. It's literaly a super tank, on of the original drafts of the Maus. To nerf it's armor so a Light tank can pen it from the front (as I've seen quite a few people do) is just ridiculous....
the vk does make the kv4 useless but the kv4 is bad anyway
I was hoping that Grille would be getting a camo buff or a mobility buff ....but it is not happening this upcoming patch....☹️
The Vk 100.01 (P) isn’t a good tank, the playerbase is just incredibly dumb. The amount of IS-X tanks that try to fight it head on is amazing. Or T34/32’s that go into the open to try to fight it.
Ignore the T28D it got aced at 8 games.
i mean the kv4 is clearly an inferior vk
KV-4 was garbage since the Leo line got added
god I hate the superheavy meta that this game is slowly going into
ranked is just "who gets to club most in their superheavies"
Kv4 was always garbage, didnt matter what other tanks were added
problem is the gun handling is so bad for a 300 dmg gun.
KV-4 has potential
To be worse than trash yes that's correct
unfortunately, the gun has crap on the move handling (which it shouldnt), the tank traverses slower than an oil tanker and its riddled with weakspots that even a tiger P can take a huge crap on it
Superheavy meta truly starts when Jap heavies arrive lol.
@lunar niche then luckily we wont see a superheavy meta
Nerf heavy viewrange, make meds useless at flank sniping
I think the equipment options need to be tuned for individual tank classes. TD's and heavies lose coated optics. In their place they get a spall liner for heavies and something else for TD's.
I concur
Maybe also consider nerfing the option that allows for extra track hp.
yay another Sp1c nerf, fun
I was wondering if i saw that right. Oh well. Yet another reason why not to play it and its autoloader.
@unique scaffold Sounds good I agree
Hey autoloaders are cool. I prefer them to any other loading mechanism. I just wish they had their own version of "Gun Rammer" instead of getting stuck with vents. That and I wish "Improved Control" and "Engine accelerator" benefited lights the most (10% for example) mediums slightly less (7-ish%) TD's less than meds (5-ish%) and heavies less than TD's (4-ish%) not to nerf heavies into the ground, but as a general class of tank I think heavies have been slightly OP since the equipment rework because you can run a particular setup that gives you nearly stock (100% crew full upgrades but no equipment or provisions) medium tank traverse and turret traverse speeds. So you can circle around their hull but you can't avoid their gun unlike the old days of blitz when slow tanks usted to be "slow". It's kimda making lights obsolete (in the competitive scene of the game) because they rely on being not necessarily faster but certainly more maneuverable than their opponents.
@brisk lily Sp1c is getting a buff, not a nerf
SP is getting a buff??
@brisk lily intraclip reloading going from 3.53s to 3.00s
oh
few of my friends said it getting nerfed
I'd like to see it go back to it's original 2.5 seconds. All other 90mm guns with autoloaders unload that fast. Why not the SP? Plus it has to compete with the LTTB. Those tanks should just swap mobility stats at this point.
@ivory flint I think it need that too
Also the T54Liwt is so broken. It has better ground resistance stats than the AMX 13-90. Mind you, the French tank weighs HALF of what the Russian one does. And yet the Ruskie gets technically better mobility and more armor because "why not" the Lttb is the same way in the comparison of tier seven lights too.
Bc wargaming is Russia bias
Tbh the is4 is so easily penned with hesh
Because T-54 series tanks have Top Secret hover craft tread technology.
True
No, because ground resistances have nothing to do with weight, and everything to do with the tracks.
I’m going to say this now because wargaming won’t direct message anyone, When I started wargaming 3 years ago I was amazed at the scenery and how the game preformed. I played it every day non stop and fell more in love with it as time passed. This is when you had competition. As the competition died off you turned your noses up to money. Instead of focusing on how the game is and improving it you decided to screw up the game and added tanks that are way to over powered. I have one statement and and one statement only to shorted what other people are saying. I’m not going to sugar coat it, pick up your game and fix it I’m done with this. You messed up the game so you could make some money, not like you were already doing that. You are people who don’t give a thought about what the players say who give you good feedback. Do your part and fix a game that many people love but not as many people hate.
@rare monolith when u mean Wargaming as a game you mean WoTb right?
Both pc wot but mainly wotb the one that I play on
So just World Of Tanks
Pretty bad stats for premiums tbh
lol how do classify bringing in OP tanks breaking the whole game, That’s 1 very minor aspect of the game, And second give me 1 tank that’s game breaking and in every match it ruins the whole experience, I cannot think of any tank at any tier. and besides if u think like WZ120 FT for example break the game then be happy it’s very rare and not many people have it. your logic here does not make sense and your dwelling on the wrong part of the game that should be improved or fixed.
u will never have a perfect game, And balance right now is fine. play tier 10 if u want a tier that’s balanced
A camo buff to Grille will be nice.....in 5.7 charts its again so low in win rate
Why they gonna nerf T71?
It is not a relevant tank.
Um, they’re buffing its clip reload to 10s
Aren't tier 7 lights getting there long awaited buffs???
They all are, but the Bulldog’s DPM is starting to look a bit crazy
Time to buff leopard 1.
nah, it has better overall stats than T62a. a bit worse wr but way better avg dmg. so what? buff T62a? that's stupid ;) the difference is really small.
the lowest ever tier X avg dmg tank is at 2450 dmg, the highest at 2800. this means a tank that is put at 1/2 far from the best tank, is balanced . the problem is only the worst. Fv183 has the worst WR by far, it needs a buff, not leo1
JG.PZ in particular needs a really huge buff. it's probably the worst tier X. lowest average damage ever, and less than average wr.
the 183 doesnt need a buff. A It should stay as a bad tank and that should be the price of playing it
it doesnt need a really "buff"
it needs a Rebalance.
it has ok average damage, and horrible wr.
this means it cant do nothing in battle for winning, can only spam damage. make it faster and and give it better min accuracy, then give the worst by far accuracy on the move, and nerf the AP/HESH pen. in this way, noobs will use it as they do now, but pros can carry, but only involving skills in it, the actual FV183 is only a random roulette no skill stupid tank, basically, with that horrible accuracy and op pen, you're going to pen only if dispersion RNG wants it.
giving to it better min accuracy and worse pen, means that a noob that shoots randomly is going to bounce or miss, a pro that shoots good is going to pen, by aiming at enemies' weak spots, not at the whole tank.
@shy wren oh lol the news i did read said were nerfs lul
The 183 doesnt need any buffs , its just the noobs who are rushing up that Tier and instantly getting the 183 without any special knowledge
Rushing the 183 line? Lol I wish I did, I ground out that line mostly stock
its pretty clear the 183 cant be balanced and should just be removed entirely(No collector) and just give players the badger and some free xp.
The 183 has always had the worst WR, but the DPB used to be the highest at tier X. The nerf has brought the average damage more in line
The problem is if you make it an average tank (Worst WR but highest DPB) it gets spammed every match. You nerf it and the spam slightly goes down(not by much) but the tank is now very bad winrate wise. I still say it needs a 0% credit coefficient with 15k HEsh shell and 5k ap shell costs
It’s just so obvious that it doesn’t belong in blitz
The alpha and hesh pen are too ridiculous and hinder any concept of it being balanced
replace it with the badger, fits more in the line and playstyle of it
Every tier x Brit has been replaced on pc
We need it here
215b has the best gun in blitz but it’s forgettable other than that
but dont replace it with the fv 4005
4202 is always good but not great. Poor thing has been buffed and nerfed so many times, I have no idea what the original even was
It’s pretty clear that 183 mm guns are not what blitz needs so I agree. No 4005. Bring in the badger
@tacit mulch they will NEVER replace the 183 with the fv4005,so don’t worry
I would make current tier x tanks collector tanks and move the 4202 to tier 8
Also you’d get the tier x replacements for free
Why replacing 215b tho (the heavy one). There’s only 3 rear turreted heavies at tier 10 and this one has unique playstyle. I don’t want a second Conqueror at the end of the line
Because the 215b has been power crept into obscurity
Not as bad as the is7
Remember that way back when, the e100 had 2400 hp and the 215b had 2300
Both lost 100 hp and both are now somewhat lost in tier x
Then buff it back
But Super Conqueror would be boring
I disagree
The 215b takes module damage like nobodies business and it can’t reliably side scrape
It’s literally just a gun
Then buff its module HP and why can’t it sidescrape, I’m pretty sure we can buff this too
It can side scrape on paper
Not in reality
The 215b hasn’t been touched in 2 years
They’re not going to buff it
Well but why
Isn’t there something we could buff
Well the SP 1 C has been untouched for 2,5 years and I heard it was going to be slightly buffed in 5.9, there is hope for 215b.
coz the super conq is basically a better 215b lol. Better depression and hull armor
yo le chat
Well, we all agree, 183 needs to be removed
Yes. I dont care if the 183 gets removed and having the new tier ten given to me would be very nice
Well I think t-62 should get more gun depression
?
@fast meteor you are not with your right mind...
I personally say i dont like less gun depression tanks
Then use a different tank
Me too but russian meds are an exception. They are just fine as they are right now. T62 basically has everything except gun depression ...
Obj 140 on the other hand feels way more comfortable
has 1 more gun depression but T62 has more turret armor and higher penetration.Therefore if T 62 gets a buff It would get crazy good
T-62 has gotten enough buffs. It basically has a laser gun now.
140 has better Hull armour and while using heat at t62 turrent it gets pen
No. T62 hull is better
But it can be penned by an Mt using calibrated shells
Hardly. 140 has weak spots
140 Hull > T-62 Hull
Not in this galaxy
Yes that's true but 121 surely needs a buff
140 is better
Wz 121 needs an reload buff or give it a good armour
Question of taste. I used to prefer 140 cuz better depression. But I know like 62 more cause of increased pen. Both are pretty similar tho
140 has better hull because of better sloping
Let’s agree that we désagree 😹 then
140 Hull better better speed...and almost same shell velocity
That’s like disagreeing over whether the sky is blue lol
Just I think 62 should get 6 degrees of gun depression than that would be balanced
Shut the t62 with same gun dep as 140 would make 140 completely irrelevant
learn to play it and dont complain its balanced
Well dont teach me I have 2.8 k avg damage in it @spring pelican
Then it's only adv would be mobility
The only tier X medium that could use some love is the 4202. It really could use a buff to the turret armor.
I feel like that would make it decent but the hull armor would need to be dropped a lil
4202 yeah
@fast meteor then dont complain
121 needs a little bit of love to its gun imo
That's fine. I don't depend on hull armor when I'm ridge fighting.
Am not complaining to u tbh
yea nerf hull armor and add turret armor and its ok
If 121 gets a buff it would be great
Or just add the Action X and turn the 4202 into a tier 8 premium like they did on PC.
Our 4202 is better than AX though statistically
If 4202 gets turrent armour than it would be op I think
Same speed, has the HEAT gun, but it has better armor on both the hull and turret. Only advantage AX has is that it looks sweet
@fast meteor if hull armor would be nerfed it wouldn't be op
Or give it more pen?
?
Like more hesh pen like 330 lmao
Nah. Just a smidge more armor on the turret.
330 HESH pen would be essentially like having a really OP HEAT shell
E50m upper hull with hesh
@orchid grove. I saw your point about the Action X and I counter with looks are their own kind of stat. And the Action X comes out ahead in that department.
Where the hell are half of the tier 8s in this new 5.7 data? I find it somewhat interesting that the WZ-120-1G FT (for example) hasn't been in the last couple, including this latest one.
Probably overperforms compared to all tier 8 tanks.
'probably'? Best laugh I've had all week...
Its only tanks which take up more than 1% of battles i believe
Hmmm, I think it'll be in the next one then, considering how many have been around after the additional 2 chances people have had to get it since it was initially sold...
I don't play much tier 8. I have it but don't play it really.
If this latest chart isn't concrete evidence that the 183 is absolutely terrible, I don't know what is.
It's the only tank in all of the 3 charts with an average winrate LOWER THAN THE MINIMUM WR OF THE PLAYERS IN THE SAMPLE... It now has much worse average damage too.
@atomic hound in order to be in the balance chart, a tank has to have been represented at least 1% of the time, or at least once every ~7 battles
I know that now, yeah, my fault for not reading it closely, I hadn't noticed that the titles were in English for the last two sets of charts now, so I hadn't looked. @orchid grove
The wz 120 ft definitely overperforms but even though its been available like three times you dont see them that often tbh
hi guys
vk 28 01 should be buffed it should have a faster reload and more gun depression 👍
No its a good all-rounder light tank
The fv215b 183 should get a slight traverse/speed buff because right now you get spotted before you even get into position, thats why it's hard to win alot of games in it
And @atomic hound I agree, the avarage winrate on my account is ~58% but in my 183 it's just ~45%
Buffing the tank would be quite controversial. Theres very few things wargaming could do to make it balanced and not too weak, or too strong. As said above, I much prefer it got replaced, and owners of the tank will be compensated with the new tank, hopefully the badger.
@unique scaffold I agree, the 4202 just needs a turret buff to make the turret more trollish in nature, rather than just paper with the occasional rng bounce
Just remove the premium hesh and buff the gun back up, and give it a little more camo. It was super accurate hesh that was the issue, so just remove the hesh rather than the accuracy.
So what would replace it then?
Removing hesh would make it another tank, the hesh alpha is the only reason to get the tank
So? It needs a rework, that much is blindingly obvious. Simple buffs and nerfs don't work, the whole concept is broken. It already had the worst wr of all tier 10s before they nerfed it
Yet before the nerf it was actually fun to use
The 183 doesn't need a buff. Honestly all it needs is a limit of two TD's per team. One 183 isn't a big deal. Two 183's backed up by some other TD is too much.
Because it was broken.
I dont know if it was broken, I only got to play 5 battles in it before the nerf
Good 🤣
@unique scaffold most TDs encourage campy gameplay, and while I think a limit of 2 would help, this has absolutely nothing to do with the 183 being broken. It isn't a good tank, that needs fixing.
Im just saying out of experience it could be a bit faster
Idk how anyone can make the argument that the tank is anything but critically underpowered at this point, which seems to be where you personally want it, correct me if I'm wrong.
It was broken before the nerf. The camo was ridiculous, especially compared to other tanks. The traverse combined with a semi traversable turret was also the same. The nerf toned it down heavily. It needs removing. There is no way to make it balanced without taking away the actual concept and why you would get the tank in the first place
My point being that in my opinion it's "broken" factor only really becomes apparent when there are multiple tank destroyers per team.
A lone 183 doesn't concern me.
Again, you've missed the point. It isn't there to concern you. The tank shouldn't be as bad as it is.
Well nerfing it took away the whole fear factor of it being on the enemy team
3 tank destroyers covering multiple approaches on the small maps that Blitz has is the problem.
smh mines with three td cap
@atomic hound I'm fine with any adjustment that makes players less likely to play tank destroyers.
You still aren't getting it. That is a completely different issue. The 183 is a terrible tank even when the situation currently favours it more than it would in a situation you're proposing. It needs to get better without being game breaking, not worse.
To your previous post, not the latest one @unique scaffold
Well the 183 is the only td line I took tbh
I do get it. It's terrible. It should be terrible. And I hope it continues to be terrible.
I just saw your response 🤦♂️
Exactly my point. You're biased, your contribution to the discussion is therefore imho negative.
I am biased. I'd like to think my contribution is neutral but to each their own.
I wouldnt say so, he is giving a different perspective to the tank
I think a degree of bias creeps into every post on here. At least I'm honest about it.
Nah, he (?) Is simply hating on it, that isn't helpful towards game balance (look at the title of the channel)
And I am biased for the tank because I play it.
I think that the number of TD's per match is a balance issue. Anything that motivates players to shift away from tank destroyers is in my opinion a improvement to the overall balance of the game. Perfectly relevant.
I'm neutral, I don't play it, I don't hate it, I certainly don't like it, and I'm looking at the empirical data and saying it needs a buff, or a complete rework.
@unique scaffold that it may be, but it has nothing to do with the 183 being terrible
Let's make all td's have a low credit coeficient so you cant play them all day
I take it you've never played the 183 lol
I have but im saying all tds should have the same credit loss con
What's to stop players who have a ton of creds
Exactly. Credits are abundant.
It would give more reason to play mediums, heavies and lights
It really wouldnt
I don't think the data tells the whole story. The 183 is almost universally hated by those who aren't driving it at the particular time. This causes them to be singled out with extreme prejudice when spotted. If spotted early they are killed fast. Now the team is down a tank and more likely to lose. If they hide in back sniping they may be getting damage but it isn't always effective damage. They are just shooting whatever is visible but not taking guns out of the fight. This to ends in a loss. The 183 is a victim of its reputation and the stats show this. To be honest I'm not sure how you fix that.
@atomic hound There's nothing wrong with 183 being bad
It needs removing case closed.
As far as balance goes I think that two things would make a huge improvement in the game.
- Cap TD's at two per team.
- Heavies and TD's lose coated optics as a equipment option. They get something else in its place.
I disliked seeing more than one 183 on red before the nerf as they could shoot and remain invisible. That was the biggest fear factor 183 had imo.
Im fine with replacement but don't let it be a completely different tank, it should keep big alpha as one of the aspects of it, not the same alpha but still something like the jageroo or a 152mm
Why. It shouldnt be similar. The deathstar makes no sense in the line. The badger makes much more sense
Then I want a complete refund of the line, I got the 183 for its alpha dmg, nothing else
I'm fine with the 183 as is honestly. All I could ask for at this point is a massive credit coefficient nerf to get the derp addicts to play it less
Here’s what I think
Ahem? You already lose 25k credits for 2k damage
The 183's alpha isn't the problem it's the play style it players have that makes it annoying
You want a refund? If it ever got removed you would receive the new tier ten for free. But wargaming have no obligation to refund you over a removal
Good. Lose more.
There should be zero motivation to play the 183.
@tacit mulch You clearly didn't play the 183 when it had like a 58% credit coefficient
-50k with a premium account every game lol
No I didnt, maybe it got buffed for a reason
@tacit mulch It got buffed during the update 2.8 economy reworks
Yeah no I wasnt around back then, as I said, I got it after the nerf
The balance discussion for this game needs a nerf
It wouldn't get the hate it does it if couldn't deal 50-90% of the hp of the targets it hits per shot. Remove the hesh.
Yes and also remove maus' armor
The tank itself is fine. The problem I have with it is the morons who do nothing but play the 183
Its overall impact to an entire team is very low, but has the potential to have a huge impact on each player individually, hence the hate and the focus.
Again, I don't think many people hate the tank itself that much; just the fact that you keep running into them all the time because of all the derp addicts who just nonstop play 183
It doesn't need more than 50% more alpha than the next highest in the game to keep the title of biggest alpha. It'd still be unique.
Well if everyone started using the 7 minutes of the game and not just 3 minutes the 183 could be usefull for the team without a buff again, but that wont happen, everyone will act like after 3 minutes the round is over so they rush
Not unique enough. I hate the lukewarm approach to balancing where you just nerf the unique aspects of tanks; it makes for less variety and overall a dull game
I understand this perspective, but this particular unique point is game breaking.
I stopped playing the 183 years ago; and all I play is paper tanks now that get HESHed by 183s, and even I won't support an alpha nerf on the 183
Lets just return every tank to their “op” form then everything would be balanced
It is not really game breaking, I only get a hesh pen once in like 5 battles
@orchid grove same here. The tank desperately needs a buff, look at the wr, but if you buff it the average damage goes off the charts, like it was before the nerf (and it was already the worst by wr then)
@tacit mulch then you're doing it wrong.
High AP and HESH pen with highest alpha on both rounds. Maybe lower AP pen and alpha and give it some armour or whatever? Just a thought.
I believe nerfing its ap damage to 860 and hesh to 1100 would be a decent balance increasing rate of fire .20
@atomic hound thats why it was removed from wot and replaced with the stage 2.
@proven helm It wasn't replaced with stage II, stage II is its own line; 183 was replaced by the FV-217 badger
Remove all but tog ii, one tank teams have balanced tanks. Now people will blame MM
@orchid grove i mean in terms of design and usage.
Also, if you nerf 183's alpha, what's next? 50 B because it can deal 1200 damage in a clip?
50 b needs a buff
Please stick to the topic I.E. removal of 183 😹
Buff 50b if should get it soon
50 B is fine as is, although I would appreciate a speed limit buff lol
To the next person that suggests that the 183 is replaced by the stage 2 in blitz (I see it a lot): 10° gun depression, double the gun arc, more mobility, better gun handling.
14mm armor*
Worse armor
But larger target easy he shots not to mention cammo
Yes lets replace the deathstar with stage ii and not badger
@atomic hound I'd personally like to see 183 replaced with the pre-buff stage II; if you want to derp me, I should be able to derp you back
But I would suggest a slight traverse buff and HESH pen nerf on the 183
@tacit mulch @uncut osprey @proven helm I know this, but it doesn't matter to the guy who just got sniped by it for 90% of his hp, does it.
Everything about the tank makes it easier to hit shots.
Or decrease 6th sense of light tanks
Lol. No @raw oar
What do you do when u get 90% of your hp derped back by another stage 2
Then you know you have been spotted, say 1s after being effectively spotyed
@atomic hound what about not standing in front of a 183 or 4005
@atomic hound It does matter. When I'm playing my Bat Chat and I get HESHed by a 183, if it were a 4005, I'd be able to take solace in the fact that I could return an HE clip back to him
^^^
I meant 6th sense delay
@uncut osprey 183s can already do that to each other, what's your point
@tacit mulch besides the point, I don't have to, I've got 6 idiots on my team to do it for me
183 just needs to have the model reduced in size by 33% and given a 4 clip mag
And more armor @hollow bridge
@raw oar You should usually know when you're spotted in a light tank, or when you might get spotted
Then complain about matchmaking more
@orchid grove yeah true, but not relevant to the comment I was making. I meant solely that the tank is even better at camping and ruining your game than the 183, not that it is a better tank overall.
My point is stage 2 is balanced by lack of armor, 183 can bounce shots, stage 2 is a piece of paper that even the lowest he pen guns can pen
Well just wait untill the 268 v4 enters the game, no one is gonna like that either
@atomic hound 4005 is worse at camping because it literally has like .02% camo rating lol
Often I know because I have 1100 hp less
Fv 183 could use an alpha buff but a 45 second reload
Overall that would push lights to go more scouting
Plus the stage 2 is just as tall as the maus
@orchid grove same as the 183 then. Nerfing camo pushes them further back.
@main tulip an alpha buff? What are you smoking?
183 had ok camo before the Blitz nerf actually
@tacit mulch even my noob teams don’t stand before 183. Its more about getting shots while relocating, trying to have a shot, escaping etc u know ....
You cant be pushed further back, I can get spotted while in spawn on the smaller maps
Yeah, but now it doesn't. The stage 2 isn't going to be introduced into the past. @orchid grove
Alpha is ok, just need to increase the bloom to 20% of the map
183 has bad camo now, but I'm not sure you understand how bad the 4005's camo is
Like it will get spotted while stationary on Blitz at ranges of like 270M
Oh and my hit ratio in the 183 is less than 20% while I fully aim my shots
@orchid grove it doesn't matter. Just camp outside of the max view range of whatever you're shooting.
@tacit mulch that is a you issue.
@atomic hound There's only a few lines of sight that long in Blitz and most players aren't dumb enough to stand in them at tier 10
If 183 gets alpha buff it would at least send you back to the garage, and long reload would make it easy prey to meds
It's not when I fully aim my shots
The maps are only 500km how much further can u really go and be effective
@orchid grove exactly why the grille and 183 suck then.
Grille sucks because its camo sucks. And it's honestly fine in my book if 183 sucks. It's more of a fun tank for variety; it shouldn't be an actually competitive tank
@orchid grove then why are you sitting in the balance discussion.
@tacit mulch I have a 73,74% Hit Rate in my 183 @568 battles.
Personally here is what i would do, scrap the 183 for the badger, add the stage 2 line from wot and end it with the stage 2, so people still have their 183mm derp but not in the form of the 183.
No offense but u mad bro @main tulip
Because I think the 183 is balanced perfectly right now. It's not good, but it's not tragic
@proven helm exactly my point from before. You'd just get hit more.
Personally I think we should delete all TD’s past tier 6 from the game.
Good the derp needs to get hit
I suggest a HESH pen nerf rather than replacing it, you would keep the key aspect but nerf it at the same time
@orchid grove it's tragic, let's be honest here. It has the worst wr of all tanks tier 8-10, and below the 55% that is the minimum career wr of the players in the sample, and it isn't even close.
The average damage is still in line with the rest of tier 10 though; and 183 has always had the lowest WR at tier 10
@orchid grove clear indications that it needs a rework then, just as I've been saying.
Buff it and the average damage just goes too high, but the wr stays garbage
You can't rework 183 without destroying the nature of the tank; which would result in less variety, which is why that would be stupid
Rework by being replaced
Let’s buff 183 AP alpha to 1050, HESH alpha to 1700, nerf reload to 40 seconds, nerf hesh pen to 175, nerf accuracy to 0.6, make the bloom horrible
Yeah so let's try to get the wr up without affecting the average dmg @orchid grove
The only feasible solution I see would be to make 183 more of a frontline tank by buffing the armor, but nerfing the RoF and accuracy further
@orchid grove I disagree, the tank just needs to change into something else. It shouldn't exist how it is now.
@atomic hound Change it into what? You can't really rework 183 without fundamentally changing the nature of the tank. This is why I have a problem with your suggestion
No one has even reacted to the idea of the HESH penetration being nerfed and the traverse being buffed
@orchid grove I'm saying IT NEEDS TO HAVE ITS NATURE FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGED. As it is it's broken.
@tacit mulch Oh hell no we're not buffing the traverse back. 183 used to have the best traverse of all tier 10 TDs and a turret making it basically unflankable, which was really fking stupid
Why not stage 2 then?
Explain the change then @atomic hound
@orchid grove when did I say buff it into being op again?
@atomic hound But that would be stupid because it would be removing the variety from the game you moron. Less variety is less fun.
I’d prefer it if the 183 could basically oneshot tanks but the reload was so long that you’d get killed by mediums before you can reload
@main tulip No.
I think youre describing artillery lol @main tulip
And make the accuracy so bad that there’s no hope of being able to camp
That sounds like something only a noob would suggest. He's not good enough to land more than one shell anyway, and he hates "campers" @main tulip
Why would you improve its best aspects more and nerf its cons aswell? Seems like a bad solution to me
Exactly that’s what it should be except it can’t shoot over stuff
@uncut osprey I'm no dev, but I'd remove the premium hesh, then buff the RoF slightly. Then either give it a marginal camo buff, or a little more armour.
@orchid grove just because you personally may not enjoy it doesn't mean nobody will. It would still hold the title for highest alpha, and the non-premiun hesh would still do 1300 damage to sides of meds, and light tanks. Variety is only good if it isn't breaking the game. It'd be like putting the wt auf e100 into the pc game, and then saying -you can't nerf it, that what makes it unique- even though it's unique point was to clip anything out, which was so game breaking that nothing short of removing it entirely fixed it.
Lot of bad ideas in here...
@orchid grove I’m no noob but it provides increased variety in gameplay and that’s always good imo. The alpha gap between gun calibres is far too low in blitz
Nerf its HESH pen and buff its top speed and maybe give it a smaller model
That defeats the whole purpose of getting the tank then without that hesh pen, then its just another camping td with its 330 ap pen
@unique scaffold any thoughts on the stage 2?
First off, 1300 alpha is far from game breaking; secondly, nerfing the 183s alpha would definitely be removing variety from the game. Why would anyone play 183 when they could play jgpz E-100 for basically the same alpha but with way more armor? @atomic hound
@uncut osprey yes, it does.
@unique scaffold go on then, what outrageous thing did I suggest to change? I already said I'm not a dev, and all my proposals other than hesh removal were incredibly minimal.
again I think the 183 is probably good enough RN(it wasnt op before but it punishes idiots who only want to camp by killing their winrate) However it is UP overall and I hate seeing them on my TEAM(this does help my winrate overall though) A buff would only increase spam. I could agree with a possible frontline buff by giving it kv2 levels of accuracy but better armor
"Other than HESH removal" lmao....
What if we remove ap, have he as standard and hesh as premium?
Right; that's like saying I want to nerf the Maus by nerfing its turret traverse by 2 degrees per second, and its pen by 2mm, and also reducing the armor to 50/50/20. "Other than the armor removal, my proposals were incredibly minimal"
Than ur smoking crack
@orchid grove a turret and more mobility, different playstile, better standard HE. You may not want that, sure, but you already said you don't play it anyway.
And Spartacus said lots, not one.
@uncut osprey you wouldnt need the calibrated shells with no hesh, the pen would drop a bit.
By nerfing the HESH pen you are basically nerfing the alpha without touching the alpha, people will have to work to get a HESH pen but it can still pen sides of alot of tanks
Also give it a 0% credit coefficient capacity with 15k hesh shell cost and 5k ap. . You shouldnt have the ability to break even with the 183 and should be punished heavily for playing a tank generally bad for the meta
@orchid grove I'm mostly suggesting buffs here, don't be ridiculous.
Who doesnt use cs anyway on every tank in tier 10 tho, nobody want the .20 rof u get with a rammer
@twilit crystal you can't break even with it at this point
@atomic hound And while you're at it, why don't you suggest the removal of the HE shell from your beloved KV-2?
Lol
@atomic hound you were arguing the hesh should be removed.
@uncut osprey having a rammer reduces the reload by a second on the 183, pretty significant if hesh pen want a concern
@orchid grove no, and I played that tank as a new player, sold it ages ago. Nobody gives one about low tiers anyway, notice how that data isn't published about wg to talk about.
1 second when u have a 20 second reload, that really helps
Yes, it does, a bigger absolute change than any other tier ten.
with a premium account you can.(it has one of the highest credit coefficients)
Thats because its rof is so bad, it still isnt a better option over cs
@atomic hound Right, because 183 players are definitely firing within a second upon reloading
Anyone would use a CS in the 183. Saving 1-2 sec of the reload isn't worth being able to pen heavies frontally.
Yeah it has a big credit coefficient to compensate for the shell cost, also let me try to break even using it with a prem account ill be back in a bit
All tier X TD’s except the 263 have too low alpha and too high RoF imo, makes it too hard to punish them with meds after they’ve fired bc reload is so fast
@orchid grove it can make a difference, that is all I was saying. The ap pen is already high enough without cs anyway, so I personally wouldn't take CS if not for the hesh.
Yeah it should lose dozen of thousands of credits. Each game should set you back 100k credits IMO That would stop the spam. Whats wrong with my idea?
First off, the credit coefficient is not "big", it's 80% which is not good. Secondly, what me and wannabeunicum want is for the 183 to be almost unplayable for extended periods of time so that the nubs will stop spamming it
^^^
@twilit crystal maybe it's not a good idea because the alpha and such will stay the same
the average 183 player is the sub 45er who camps in the back and gets a shot off and dies but still does 1k or 2k dmg(its very easy to counter at the end but nubs spam coz it gives them a lot of dmg) therefore make sure the nubs cant play 20k battles in it
@orchid grove then you already have your wish, but that has nothing to do with balance, which happens to be what this channel is about.
Credit coefficient is very much a balance tool
I want 183 to be removed simply bc I want to go up the AT line but I don’t want the 183
The 183 is balanced statwise but not mm wise.(it wreaks havoc on mm and gameplay) Therefore credit coefficient nerf is the best . Each game should cost 100k credits IMO
@atomic hound. Geez what makes you think I'm talking about your ideas? Not everything is all about you 🤣
I think most reasonable players think 183 is more or less fine as is stat wise; we just want to see fewer of them in the matchmaker; which is why we want the credit coefficient nerfed into the ground
You could also make the HESH maybe do 100 less damage than the regular HE, to give them some incentive to use different ammo types
@unique scaffold fair do's then, but I didn't see anyone else making any suggestions, and the waves of criticism that were to me were pretty thick.
no the 183 is balanced statwise. It punishes idiots by lowering their winrate severely and it no longer allows dmg stat padding to the same degree. However nubs can still do 1k dmg a game by tapping once and therefore the only balance is a credit coefficent nerf to 0
@proven helm. We don't need anymore tank destroyers. Period.
We need more tank destroyers
What we need is autoloader meta 😆
More deathstars
The levels of stupid and/or overwhelming bias in this channel are somewhat ridiculous now, I think I'll take my leave.
Anyway for some reason i have 183 syndrome in my t57 heavy. It doesnt affect the amx 50b I have though.(high dmg low winrate)
@unique scaffold i meant replacing the 183 with it lol
I’m all for WT auf E 100 coming into the game
Didn't people get mad that WG once replaced the premium HESH on british meds with HEAT?
@atomic hound Considering you literally didn't have a single supporter, I'd say you're the one who is stupid lol
Oof
What did @atomic hound propose again
@lunar niche that was to punish unicums and help pubbies
@main tulip He wants to remove the HESH round from the 183 and buff the rest of it
@orchid grove ok dude, but if you think that the 5 random people that were here are representative of the entire playerbase... Well... I've made my point.
WG really hates fast tanks especially with autoloaders. The biggest bias is the grave digger vs amx 13 57 unload time. Grave = 3 sec 13 = 5
I’d be fine with a 2 TD cap tbh, but the 183 looks truly horrible to drive in its current state
M4A1 rev needs a bit more dpm or faster traverse, but as it is right now, the gun and mobility just don’t compensate for the poor armor
Well i think im good enough to apply input 😇 @atomic hound
it should be more horrible to drive. 0 credit coefficeint
@static dew just buff its accuracy and alpha to 350 and 👌
All Reavlorise needs is 350 alpha
Being a good player has nothing do do with it. 2 of the main people to disagree with me both admitted that they want the 183 unplayable, which is completely against my stance, I want it balanced, so even if you don't agree with my propositions to fix it, they're still wrong, look at the title of the channel.
Balanced fv = removed from the game
That is certainly an option, sure. At least it's a fair one.
What we meant by "unplayable" was so that fewer players would drive it; not to change the battlefield performance
@atomic hound your idea of “playable” is to take away everything special about it so it’s just like every other TD
@main tulip accuracy is great tho
@main tulip if 290 more alpha than all the other ones with similar playstyles isn't enough for you...
And as I've said, I just want it balanced, which I can't see happening if hesh stays, and the data backs me up here. If I'm proved wrong and it can be balanced with hesh, I'm all for it.
I've tried like 3 battles and you cant break even with a prem account @twilit crystal
Well then, gun handling or slightly more pen @static dew
point is it still should basically be 0
@atomic hound not even close lmao, it’s exactly 3x the damage that a T-62A can do which isn’t enough of a difference
U cant compare a med and a td
You werent saying that a couple of minutes ago
Yeah but neverless i still love playing it, it’s playstyle and its looks are so satisfying
Plus the 62a can shoot 3x as fast @main tulip
@main tulip ISU is a tank with huge alpha for its tier. Has 3x alpha of most meds.
Exactly, but the difference should be 4 or 5x imo
@atomic hound kv2 has same alpha right?
That would make its dpm like 4500-5000 so no
@atomic hound well It’s almost no difference compared to PC, where it’s 750 alpha to 240
@tacit mulch yep.
@uncut osprey no not like that, lol, nerf the 183 reload but buff the alpha
Well @main tulip if you want to play a tank with 4 or 5 times the alpha of mediums at its tier, play the KV-2 and stop wanting more tanks to be the same
Still no @main tulip
I don’t want to play tanks like that they’re no fun for me but other people seem to like it and I enjoy playing against them so win-win
Cuz they are noob friendly that why people like them
Then stay at tier 6 like I play half of my games
Cuz I have 20 tier 6 tanks in my garage atm
Have you folks solved the 183 dilemma yet?
@tacit mulch oh, and assuming your earlier comment about not saying that a few minutes ago was to me, it is exactly what I've been saying all along. I want the tank balanced, that is it. I don't think it can be balanced with hesh, but if it can be balanced with it, I get what I want, don't I.
@unique scaffold you obviously have a great sense of humour 😂
@unique scaffold nerf hesh pen, buff speed limit
Lower alpha, increase rof, slight speed buff, slight armor buff, lower credit coefficient
Also @atomic hound That message was to Wannabeunicum (I dont want to tag him for no reason). But I didnt tag him in the message so I understand where you come from