#tank-balance-discussion
1 messages · Page 108 of 1
omg tusbodi ur so right.. I'm in the american servers and I'm getting like 100 ping and I'm playing with people that get 10
@vast ermine i agree completely i am in australia and average 230 ping
Very true about the ping, but some people also play on "bad" devices so they get problems with fps too...
my average ping is like 30 👌
My is 250...
Ping under 20 from here
I play with 60 fps 80ms ping and about 2% packet loss
i guess the sp1c should be a little faster as much as lttb
Also 2 sec reload
Spic is super low compared to LTTB
All tier 7 lights except the Bulldog and Type 62 could use a buff. Especially the SP1C
Lttb doesn't need a buff
The T71 was decent when i played it, but that was more than a year ago🙄
tbh lttb doesn't need buff what i need is the stock gun get up tiered without any stats change so i could use it on rating
because who need a really long gun when you could achieve 100% manueverability there a very unpopular opinion
and about spc... i dunno fam it's already satisfying with current stats but everyone just want more from this boi
more shell velocity maybe? since the current one really slow
because using SPC kinda equivalent to using Revolver in FPS Game
Shell velocity was supposed to be slow, to compensate high pen and damage. But now that they nerfed the pen to hell, made the autoloader slower, it has nothing really good on it...even speed is lower than all tier 7 lights
SPIC is the worst light in t7 IMO...
what about t71 lol
T71's 100 times better
🤔
@unique scaffold I think alpha should be buffed or at least The reloading time, kpf70 is a very situational tank
I agree. The alpha for the T49 and the kpf should be buffed to KV-2 levels.
T71 One of the worst? Gimme a brake @tiny cairn
As it stands right now, in my opinion the only tier VII tech tree light worth playing is the Bulldog.
Here something for balance discussion, wargaming needs to get its mm straightened tf out, not give me 3 AFK's AT ONCE, and the game before this i had 2 afk's and 3 other people did 0 dmg, at tier 8 and up there is no excuse to do 0 dmg unless u were ammo racked , but these teams are just straight up bad and afk, the other thing wargaming needs to balance out is not letting kids buy prem tanks if they havent earned the tier, cause i lost a game because a kid with 34 games, 32% wr, 200 avg dmg, HAD 2 TIER 8 prem tanks and had a earned tier of 3, those are the kids that ruin the game because they buy a prem tank at a high tier then cant play the tier
That is bs man, I feel your pain
Its balance discussion
im saying they need to balance out the mm so people such as myself dont get bottom of the barrel teams and then these good players get decent players and other god players
Look at the pinned messages. This isn't the place.
You can use #general-blitz-discussion for discussing about the matchmaker.
well then just buff the velocity since the pen already nerfed and autoloader is now slower... simple right?
But it wouldn’t help it at all, it needs a bit more pen and at most 3s reloading between shells, it has been over nerfed
aside from that mine opinion
spc still fun to play atleast they not removed the autoloader like in the PC
if they remove it nah there i would like to complain it but the autoloader still fun to play for now so yeah i wouldn't much complain
I like to play SP 1 C but come on, I ace it with 1600 dmg
because nobody see spc interesting anymore since T49 coming duh... ofc you will get easier Ace Mastery since everyone leaving SPC
well atleast that is my opinion because you literally could be 1 shooted with it
well that is just what if scenario when getting high tiered
Well I’m careful enough to avoid derps generally
But that 3.5s between shells disabled the autoloader since you can easily get cover and avoid the 2nd shell, and I think all tier 7 meds and lights deserve a pen buff, especially SP 1 C that had a strong pen
well i could agree that yeah some meds gonna appreciate some pen buff
3.5s enough to do 2x200+ shell with spc great gun depression (yeah i know because it's supposed to be like that) and because the maneuverability is really support it so i don't think it's necessary to reduce the shell loading time
lemme say this again "playing SPC is like you playing FPS game with a revolver, you need to know how to unload everything in right time"
well that is if you really want to maximize damage
That’s actually really accurate
Well comparing WoTB to FPS game is weird but ok
But I still think that 3.5s is too much and 3s at most would be fine
there is arcade shooting fps and theoretically WoTB is Arcade shooter with both TPS and FPS
But we’ve got tanks and not humans, with armor and different roles
are you implying First Person are only applicable to human? it's also mean where you put the Camera, where you put the FOV, etc so it's applicable
there is also First Person in story/novel
Nope I’m just saying that a tank game is different than a game with humans, regardless of the camera position
it's still same duh atleast in the paper
well anyway 3.5s shell reload is enough... take it or leave it
3.5s is too much, because T71 can just outperform it
3.5 could be okay if SP 1 C had better mobility
its already have the maneuverability it's needed duh and then you compare it with a 3x150 shell autoloader tank?
you can't compare SPC with other lts on it's tier and that is truth
Do you understand what I meant ? T71 can do the job of SP 1 C, but better, although it’s not its role, this is the problem
What WG did was literally give a tank a good gun to compensate bad mobility and shell velocity, then nerfed the gun.
Comparing SP 1 C to other tier 7 LTs would make no sense if there was no problem about this SP 1 C
T71 can do SPC job
there you wrong
also implying autoloader 200x2 shell not already a way to compensate an lts to keep competitive in it's tier
spc is just leaved by it's user because the current T49 meta
But it’s not competitive anymore due mostly to bad pen
And T49 is also left behind because no one can handle it correctly
and then you think that HEAT pen is a joke?
What’s the problem of T49 HEAT pen, it’s literally worse than SP 1 C AP pen
duh what i talking about is SPC heat
it's still enough compared to other and also SPC AP pen still enough to slice everything in it's weakest point except a VKP
My bad
I do not use prammo and why would they nerf AP pen on SP 1 C, it wasn’t even overperforming
People just complained about SP 1 C platoons unloading 900 dmg in 2 secs
But just make the autoloader 3s and the pen 180 would bring it back into the meta
see that red arrow? that is the AP pen you talking about
see other pen?
160 is still very bad. Btw do you see that 160 pen American 76mm?
And look how awful the DPM is, although that stat isn’t that relevant
Others LTs also have the manœuverability to flank properly
and you said the maneuver+gun depression still not enough?
Gun depression is good, but pen isn’t clearly what it used to be, manœuverability is awful for a light tank
its has good terrain resistance for it's class
pen also good enough to keep up with other
IMO all tier 7 MT and LT deserve pen buff.
Maybe it has terrain resistance, but other LTs have just better speed and acceleration, so it doesn’t’ really matter
when the acceleration is important, it's render useless without good terrain resistance
you should try play LTTB in 100% maneuverability if you don't believe it
I played all tier 7 LTs
What’s the point of terrain resistance if your engine can’t make you move ? LTTB, T71, M41 and AMX 13 75 had no problem reaching their top speed, without equipment and provisions
and so spc
But its top speed is lower
And it has less acceleration because of low engine power
you could always pick lttb if you want speed
also you not played every tier 7 lts btw
Ok I do not played Type 62 but all tech tree LTs tier 7
T49 ATM seriously ?
and one more you forget mention there is other lts in tier 7 too
T49 ATM is a T49 downgraded to tier 7, not balanced and removed from the game. It has no importance in our tier 7 balance discussion
AMX 13 57 is kind of special and I wouldn’t compare it others
there
Let’s talk tech tree
AMX 13 57 is too unique
It was not removed because of imbalanced , it was removed course the event for the tank was over
fair enough but amx 57 f is still lts
Ikr, I didn’t’ say that T49 was removed because unbalanced, I said that it had never been balanced cause it was for fun
AMX 13 57 is too unique, we can’t compare it to others
Why play any tier 7 tech tree light when you can just play the Type 62?🤷♂️
@unique scaffold
Because I’m poor
let me tell you again SPC is fine as long as you
- didn't remove the autoloader
2.has good balance between weight to ratio, terrain resistance, and acceleration
3.reduce the gun depression
also said that by who own E25
down me got point
Then play the Bulldog.
https://media.giphy.com/media/l0NwKAlZzZ9pyi9fa/giphy.gif
@unique scaffold not a lot of people can afford buying everything in the shop including me...
play bulldog then simple right?
@sleek vault why would owning E 25 make any point in our LT discussion ? This little TD has nothing to do here.
And SP 1 C has worst tier 7 p/w ratio + autoloader is meh
Because I’m poor
ok re***d
Bulldog really does leave the competition behind when it comes to tier 7 tech tree lights.
"T49 ATM is a T49 downgraded to tier 7, not balanced and removed from the game." Cough Cough
@sleek vault I bought it 2 years ago, now my situation has evolved lol
@smoky yoke not balanced and removed from the game doesn’t means removed from the game because unbalanced. It just means that it has nothing to do in balance discussion, since it was only fun event
The most irritating thing about the T49 ATM was right after the update that nerfed the standard T49 the ATM was still in play. That stupid thing had the module dmg that the T49 used to have but at a tier lower.
Btw I prefer AMX 13 75 over M41. I like autoloaders
T49 ATM is WG Social experiment btw "so what if we put a T49 in tier 7 and see how we could rebalance it after recent backlash from T49"
I remember how you just shot another T49ATM/T49 right on the fron and 100% they got ammoracked
T49 atm is coming back btw
Eventually
@smoky yoke where did you see that information?
@unique scaffold. I'm all about gun handling. The M41 has an amazing ability to land shots on the move and with the single shot gun has a 4 second reload. No other tier 7 tech tree light comes close to it when it comes to dpm.
Mhhmmm to find it now, it was in questions and answers from streams, go to blitzposts and read through you will eventually find it
On the subject of being poor... I picked up the Lorraine this morning and it is awesome.
im gonna leave it to you
SPC doesn't need decrease in it's shell loading
it's still competitive even with 3.5 s
@unique scaffold well I find that meh since it’s meds job to deal dmg and they do it better, I prefer the nice spotting abilities with autoloader that can be dissuasive, deal 480 dmg then run away
To each their own.
Personally I think anything over 2.5 seconds when it comes to interclip reload is way too long. Why play a SP1c with a 3.5 second interclip when I could play a M41 with a straight 4 second reload? Sure you've got higher alpha but when it comes down to putting out the hurt a M41 really has much more potential.
Sure, the M41 gun can do a good job and the mobility is lovely
@unique scaffold than you do not like IS3 defender
I don't have one and have zero interest in Soviet Heavies.
I'm not a fan of playing heavies at all. I'm very much a mobility over armor type of player.
Oh I’m not the only one
Well I like IS-2Sh but this one’s more of a German VK45.02B than another IS tanks
Give me a mobile tank with a good gun and good gun depression and I'm happy. Armor is for pansies.
@unique scaffold I like meds and lights too most played tanks are from those classes but I got the IS3 defender from the unlucky spin and I absolutelly love it with the 7.5 sec interclip reload (no sarcasm)
Enjoy it man but like I said that isn't my type of party.
Mobility and armor are for yoloers. A big gun is what a tank needs
A 183 player
That same player thinks their tank will blow up if they leave spawn. @unique scaffold
@unique scaffold How dare you, no one was supposed to know that !
Bring back the 1.3 reload on amx 13 75 that would show you a good time, I used that tank for the Vindicator event and dominated, I literally went on a 60 win streak, to a point where tier 7s were suiciding on me xD. I refuse to play it at the 2 second reload , doesn't have the same impact as before
I remember just off loading and running away, as you can see I haven't played it in a year
Well I still love this tank, with 1,3s and un-nerfed accuracy too much people were using it as a TD (well not even as a TD, just kemp bush 4 the W)
Well If you played it before the nerf , you understand the pain of seeing how the tank turned out afterward, all beaten and bruised into submission with all honor and glory taken.
I agree that they could have kept 1.3s reload since they nerfed accuracy
That would have been great
I would still have it in my garage if that would have been the case
BLITZ has a history of excessive nerfs. I've long said that the Blitz development team should have a hidden department that takes any proposed balance changes and divides them by 2 before they hit the game.
But have you noticed that those excessive nerfs mostly hit lights and meds, and when they hit LT/MT, they’re not undone?
Yes
I wonder why they give advantage to HT/TD over LT/MT
because why should skill be viable
because as in wot pc(but in a minor impact) mt and lt are op
They’re not OP at all
Meds spamming prammo are annoying, yeah but not OP
maybe not for playerbase, but for superunicum it is
NOW they"re not op, before tier X meds nerf they were op, like tier XI tanks
they had all more pen and more turret armor, also more difference of dpm, go flank in hulldown and win 100% of the time
now , lucky us, isnt like this
True
t62a against you = lost battle (costant 300 dmg every 5 seconds because no one was able to pen its turret when driven by super unicums)
Still unnerfed on pc. But they have a lot of broken/op tanks.
Because lights and mediums allow a skilled player to use mobility and map knowledge to a better effect then heavies or TD's. This isn't saying that good players don't play those tanks just that they (in most cases) cannot affect the course of a battle like a well drive light or med. By nerfing these tanks Wargaming is indirectly trying to nerf skill. That is not easy to do though and by nerfing a tank to the point that will affect a skilled player they make the tank very hard for the average player to be successful in.
At least that is how I see it.
Maps needs to be fixed. Meds and lights should have enough place flank heavies. In current maps its nearly imposible to flank without getting spotted. Maps needs to be bigger.
I mean I kinda agree but sometimes the problem is simply people not the map as in people completely forget about certain routes and bushes
Ye most noobs doesnt have any map awarness
even in tier 7
In all tiers
some premium tanks are outright op
ik they are supposed to be hard to get and payed but look at the t150 and t-34-85 rudy.Out-dps most heavies and some TDs
rudy even fires faster than a t25/2
How about the Gravedigger, with the ability to shoot holes in you at quick succession, unfair advantage
T25/2 has a 90mm gun tho, it has higher DPM than the Rudy @harsh oriole
how come i lost a 1v1 against rudy without failing a shot.oh yeh the hp
Honestly I don't know how you did, were you fully upgraded with the top gun, provisions and a gun rammer?
top everything
I mean Dpm means nothing if you don't have the hp to be constantly in front of their gun
True, Rudy does have more HP and better armour, the T25/2 is honestly a glass cannon
@sudden pier it's also a great sniper
Yeah I loved it, the T28 PROTOTYPE tho.
Talk about underpowered @crystal spoke
Yeah...I don't have it maxed though
I'd say hp buff bc it has decent armor if angled
Yes, T28 needs a buff...
Id like it if T28 got at least some kind of engine buff or something it's got a tier 6 engine.
The T26E4 needs a better engine... tier 6 engine in a tier 8... I could probably beat a T26E4 in a race with the kv5, which has a much more powerful engine and the same speed.
Kpfpz 70 needs at least a reload shortened of 1 sec without rammer. 16.6 seconds is too much for a 152 mm American gun who does 530 dmg instead of 640 like the 150-152-155 mm other guns
152mm guns in general need to be looked at. There is certainly a lack of consistency in their capabilities.
People need to understand having a bigger map would be tuff on low spec phones. Until the majority of people can have iphone or samsung level specs then they can make bigger maps
@unique scaffold +1
Mav...
Who...
Its conqueror is good or not
buff the T-34-3 reload, 13.5sec with rammer on a med, amazing
@unique scaffold Rudy is a t-43 with better gun handlings and dpm but worse hp pool and view range.
,,Iphone or samsung level specs..."
There are chinese phones with the same, or even higher specs than Samsungs for less than half of the price.
This years midrange processor, the Snapdragon 636 is able to run the game on Full graphs 50-60 FPS.
You can buy a phone with this SoC for just about 200-250€
@smoky sierra Conqueror is the best gun you can find on tier 9 😃
Stock tier 9.... Oof
Try stock toirtoise at tier 10
@astral lava uh no tortoise has it
The top gun will make it worth it. It runs really smooth on the fv215b too
I don't think the top tier leopard is actually good, you can get the E 50m as your German tier 10 medium and I think it's much better at least you'll be able to bounce some shots unlike the leopard which swallows alot of HE... I personally am still going for the E 50m while I'm actually much closer to the leopard
Leopard 1 has a better gun and view range
It can flex much better as well. But overall i gotta agree woth ya, e50m is in a great state atm
weird flex
sp1c is gud but it sometimes gets bullied by lttb and "vampires"
And pretty much every other tank
Sp1c desperately needs a buff.
if its speed was 65+?
Nah in the gun department.
u mean the reload between magazines ,which was nerfed
buff WZ-113 ammo capacity from 34 to 48 pls
for the sp1c the speed to 68plz
@remote basin buff your playstyle. T-34-3 doesn’t play like a normal medium. If you need dpm, you’re playing it wrong
Raik back at it again with the harsh truths
make a REAL MM with player's stats I can't play with these noobs who rush in RHM, die and flame all players !
@terse marten you’re telling me that wg or someone has the time to intentionally rig games to ruin your day?
not only today... it's EVERY days
i founded RHM who rush, now a tiger 2 who camp at spawn and play only HE and a little great isu who rush vs 3 heavys and 2 meds
if i send all replays with trollers and noobs wargaming will have arround 40 tickets per day...
We all get those kind of people man.
Same teams we all get. @terse marten. It's what you do that makes the difference. Also check the pinned messages here. This isn't the place to cry about MM.
if it's to play like that we can all do another account and play full HE so......
There is no mm issue. Take off the tin foil hat please
so where @unique scaffold ? on the forum ? he is dead french admins are disconnected every day... on channels in game ? i will be flame by noobs... on the game ? same as channels so i make it here
It’s a small percentage of players ruining the games. Either dumb, troll or afk
Happens to everyone
This
and what is the percentage of players without 50% or more who play now ?
@terse marten. how about you realize that we are all affected by the same teams and it's what you do that makes the difference? Then instead of griping here or on the forums about matchmaking work on what you can do to improve the situation. Just an idea.
an idea ? why you don't make players stats in the MM ? as 0%/50% and 50%/100% start on T5
another idea ? 0/900 average damages and 900/infinity
Why are you still on about matchmaking in this channel?
And watch wait times go through the roof? No thanks.
Anyway I'm done with this discussion. This isn't the place to cry about matchmaking. End of story.
Since they are reselling collectible vehicles, do you think they might be buffed one day? Like for instance the kpfw B2 ~ it’s slightly worse in every area than the B1 from the tech tree
the B2 never has to face tier 5 though
@clever mauve correct me if I'm wrong but the B2 has preferential MM and never sees tier V.
Ohhhh
Interesting! I have no idea. I still enjoy my su76I with a high win rate but I hear the combat car is a meme tank lol terrible pen
Also I wish they would replace AP rounds on the bt7 artillery with heat or something
Why? HE does more damage and has higher pen. Only thing that the AP is good for is shooting thru walls, which heat can’t do
Wait a sec there, straight he has little to no penetration. Where as aphe (armor piercing with explosive filler) would do more damage compared to a solid shot ammunition.
@clever mauve Yeah. Pz b2 has preferential mm and doesnt see tier fives because the gun is terrible and has incredibly poor pen. I load 90% apcr in it.
The armour is really good going against equal tiers and lower tiers which is the highlight of the tank
Reading your comment in the news channel, the b2 isn’t underpowered at all. A lot of tanks seriously struggle to pen you
Okay I think I’ll get it then !
Yes its terrible 🤪
Seal clubbin (ish) tank
Pretty seal clubby
Nicee
Not bad...
the pen on t7 car is way too low
drive a light vic
I used to have the T7 car, loved the thing for some reason lol
Lol get used to it everyone has those games
It's funny to see how Stupid-Wargaming made me lost 4 battles after I won 12 in a row just because I was winning, putting me in team with noobs and making me going down with 0.01% instead of going up. Stupid-Wargaming doesn't care about noobs, only about money (that's a secret)
MM is the same, problem is the playerbase that refuse to improve.
The problem with you so called pros is your ego, and you use the WR as a form of abuse, I may have 48.43 but before Christmas it was 49.24, just because you have high WR means squat as i have battled with players who's stats were 60.15 and they played disgustingly and we lost, many of you so called 50%ers head for the obvious spot on map where the enemy have advantage you skyline and they shoot holes in you happens all the time, so instead of wasting your energy whining about new players how about offering tips and help instead of abuse, as this is a game and there will always be new players. WG is not going to change something they know that works or change for your over enlarged egos...
How do you get to auction, I've been on site but it just shows what's available, I click on a tank & it just goes to tankopedia? Sry to be so dumb
Won't deny that some 55%+ players i have met were really toxic when they yoloed and died.
Offering tips nowadays is like trying to make a goat speak english.
@sly rivet ,my wr down .1 since just before Xmas , it's matchmaker not individuals, I have over 50 k battles , I was slowly getting up to 50% , .1% is a massive number of losses, over 6 months of gains with my number of battles lost in 1 month, matchmaker does not seem to use ping either
R3D I disagree I have taken New Players into clan that don't meet clan requirements they have thrived helped by our higher %ers, what most players rather do is abuse because their poor WR goes down, on the Asia server its a language communication problem many times, maybe having a communication for tactics prior to battle would would help heaps as you get mediums and lights going one way and heavies going the other way ending up with no support
@sly rivet I know there are players who will accept help but most i met and tried to help just got me a F** off instead. I've stopped since then.
Players can improve themselves wether by watching videos or learning the strength and weakness of their tanks. Thats how i improved. Majority of players refuse to improve and just drive and shoot.
I concur Ennui, Australian connection is rubbish i have to log off and on to get yellow ping, I have 23k battles MM is an algorithm so it chooses, R3D patience mate its a game of skill and tactics these are learnt and many dont understand the concept and treat game as first shooter, I learn by my mistakes and i have been guilty of being salty many times but getting banned has changed my perspective and manners my PTSD dont help but thats controlled
Players will not learn if you have MM keep them in lower tiers, WG is a business and will not change MM as they have overheads
@sly rivet Not saying every players under 50% are noobs. I was pointing out how majority of players under 50% refuse to improve.
5K battles is a lot. You learn a lot from that amount of battles. I still see players with 16k/35k battles under 50% wr staying back and sniping with E100/IS 4. That is the problem. They refuse to improve.
<<<50k + , slow learner , but was having 60% + sessions before silly season started
R3D I totally agree I get abused when using my TDs being called a camper lol my obj or 100y but can say i have never camped one of my HTs
MM is the same no matter what. WG expects random 7 players to work together which does not happen. If you are in a team full of those drive and shoot yoloers, you are gonna lose even if you toon with a 70%.
Why did the whatch video fore 10 gold get removed?
Went down from 49.68 to 49.58 in one lousy month
For me that's many many loses after 50k + battles
Enuui Im with you there im still trying to crawl back towards 50% but i now look at WR as a pain and try to up my damage %, and try too win
The amx IV has good armore
Also earning a masters Medal is no mean feat, makes my day when i earn one
@sly rivet , yep that's the way to go, ignore wr & wr phobes
Just battled most of team were Russian with no english how can this be fair when you cannot communicate?
It says you are supose to get extra tickets when you have a premium accaount and i have that but i dont get extra tickets!
How many do you get with premium account?
@sly rivet this is becoming a real problem, Slavs should be on the Russian server. There needs to be a simple direction bar .
@sly rivet the issue is people don’t bother to improve, and I try help them by saying go here or there but sniping with e100 is more effective apparently
You think that's bad? How about a VK 100.01 (P) trying to climb the Castilla TD hill at spawn in a tier 8 game?
That's a pro strat right there @jovial kernel
next level tourney strat
We make a tier 8 tourney team, all vk 100 p on castilla
All stuck eternally trying to climb that hill
Please create a Tiger 131 camo for the Tiger I
Then change the ingame name to 'Tiger 131'
No
But we do need a Cobra King camo for the Jumbo just for the "First to Bastogne" on the side
Anyone find the Scorpoin extremely overpowered? It's basically a TD on a MT body
My Tiger got 1 shotted my a Scorpion
I play for fun and I’m a unicum in all my tanks but my wr in them is 50 and my overall wr is 62 this play for fun 45 50 40 wr is bs
But then some I get good wr and some super bad but they all improve over time heavys can help teams the most right like maus not shooting but dp sidescraping everything?
WAIT... Why is Tankenstein in the German Tech Tree???
@high briar It has light tank armor and acceleration is barely better than some heavy tanks
buff centurion 7/1, it is still bad
While I'd enjoy a buff I don't think it particularly needs one. I would like the good HESH on the L7B to not be premium ammo though
The cent 7/1 has the worst DPM with regular ammo, but the best with HESH among T9 meds
But it could use a speed buff to maybe 45 km/h🙄
how about no, it already has a wonderful gun, being the best pen among all tier 9 meds and with a turret that is superb which hardly anyone pens unless they aim
Oh crap... Do we have to aim? 😊
@severe valve Loooool Best Joke so far this year
Maybe speed buff only, Dpm no need. Maybe buff dpm on the Non HESH gun. Otherwise its Good
Please do not nerf the Fv 215b (183)
The reason people want ut to be nerfed because they cannot stand being HESH at their Side and Rear (lol)
The Fv 215b (183) is actually stressful to use,not like u shot 1 and u got a kill bruh
It’s just the salty people being killed by it got their saltyness out-of control
@deep owl no the reason is because it pulls of very strange snapshots
Pretty wierd yeah..?
it is like a KV 2 but faster aimtime and faster turret which make it a bit too good ... but otherwise I think the tank is balanced
Plz,do not pull the Kv2 into this,Kv2 is a Meme,Life,and Happiess for everypeople
Conclusion: Kv2 is the tank we hate and we love :3
@lean forge i think that the pen on t7 car is way too low i bought it and i can pen only some light tanks t1e6 light vic ...
Well it was a bit balance in 5.2
Now it’s 5.6.2
A update for low tier,so which means any too O.P tanks in low tier would be removed or be into Collector Tanks or be so nerfed
Hello I sold a collectible cart and I wanted to ask you if you can get back in exchange for gold
Probably not
I sold it for 1000 gold
Still I haven't heard of wargaming giving tanks back to people who sold them
@warm meadow you can get them back
Yes?
but it is a very long process as you need to contact Support within a year of the bought item/sold item and you need to say the reason you sold it/ bought it and some more stuff ... but if you buy a tank from the auction for example you can not refund it as the price changes every day and that there will be vehicles returning - for example someone buys the last Dracula but then refunds it and a person right after the last Drac was sold checks and he sees that 0 dracs are left but after the player has refunded it another guy comes and sees a refunded dracula and buys it. That way the person in the middle gets screwed @warm meadow
Thx
@deep owl. It's getting nerfed bud... And it is about time.
;-; waaaaaaaaa
Choose what to buff in Kpfpz 70:
- DPM (now reload is 16.6 sec)
2.Camo (it's nearly useless, everyone can see me it seems, even from far away)
3.Aim time (good for me, but it could use a buff)
4.Alpha (530 now instead of the common 640 of 152 mm guns)
@cunning compass loooool, no.
A tank that is near useless in tier 10 matchups with an unreliable HESH round, poor top speed, and large profile.
Kpfpz has common HE, not HESH
needs a DPM and speed buff dearly
@severe valve I’d like a speed boost more than anything else, and then 10mm more pen on HESH 😋
how about a DPM buff, remove the HEAT gun because that's not even how it's supposed to be played.
@severe valve I agree on the 7/1. If someone is using the HEAT gun they are uncultured and should not be playing the tank.
Unpopular opinion. Nearly every medium tank from tier 8 to 10 needs a buff of some sort.
FYI the Lorraine is awesome.
does anyone ever play in same control mode??
@unique scaffold WG buffed them, then over nerfed them, then buffed them back to square one. They still need a buff because they are in the exact same spot as they were a year ago.
i guess 268 need a small buff in dpm cuz 704 is faster at reload!
No lol 268 doesnt need a buff
@unique scaffold @severe valve I agree with both of you. The 7/1 needs a little something. Not sure exactly what, but something.
Then again, I think all three British Mediums from 8 on up could stand a little love. I actually think the need grows as the Tiers go up.
The FV 4202 just feels so behind the curve with the overbuffing that the Russian Mediums keep receiving. Great gun depression isn’t very important if your turret can’t even bounce lower tier shots.
Yeah the tier 8 is awful too
m4 was made tier 4 from tier 5 in last update, its so much op at tier 4!
There wasn't changes on tank tiers exept the Chaffee went from T5 to 6
Or i forgot something ?🤔
Yeah I didn't think the m4 got dropped but I don't usually play down at the lower tiers so I could be wrong
WG please give me a Premium Tank, opened a ton of crates but never got any good Premiums
Wargaming didn't say u had to get a premium tank from the crates only that you you could get 1
I Think i was really lucky to get the predator UM out of the container
Yeah
What premium?
How does any of this pertain to balance?
@wet cosmos do you mean the M7?
Cent I needs more speed - the gun and DPM are good, but it’s so blinking slow and the turret armor isn’t really that good as the eyebrow is a large weakness. I don’t mind the 7/1 currently, I think it’s in less need of a buff than the the 8 or X.
Take down the amount of xp needed to get the top guns, it's hilariously bad xD. I grinded at the beginning then stopped, Then Free experience the rest.
The FV 4202 is fine imo.
It has good dpm even without HESH
The mobility is perfectly fine as well.
If they would buff the turret armor, then the tank would be OP as...
But the Cent 1 is just bad
Lol
It'd be really nice if the good HESH on the L7B you find on the Centurion 7/1 and FV4202 wasn't premium ammo so there was the ability to profit if you were actually good at the tank
can you like unnerf the T-150? you made it so sluggish funny enough slower then the KV-4 and KV-2 on hull traverse
and when is the M4 Sherman getting its premium ammo rebalanced? (stock 75mm) as it still does more damage than its AP shells
T-150 was nerfed on mobility making it only good in a straight line and the really only thing it has going for it is its armor even tho that is mediocre
21 -> 16 degrees per second on hard terrain
17 -> 13 degrees per second on medium terrain
12 -> 9 degrees per second on soft terrain
just to have a gun module HP buff of 148 -> 160 hp
Weirdly I find it still playable
i just find is so sluggish and hard to turn on maps like canal
its hard to keep your front to enemies on maps like that with alot of medium and soft terrain
yeah but again, I find it weirdly playable
i mean its playable it just under preforms on those maps
and just for reference i got Clutch braking 4 and engine accelerator and its sluggish as it needs the accelerator to get up and go as it is improved control only gives .7 more degrees per second traverse
Hello
This is the slowest slowmode I have ever seen. Btw I am noob trying to get credits to get tier 5 tank (already have xp) can you help with that?
( #general-blitz-discussion @shut warren
If Wargaming put 10% of the effort into Blitz as they do in PC world of tanks it might be a half decent game
@unique scaffold my bad, meant for m7... doesn’t lower tier changes in last update part of rebalance ?
@grim horizon Yeah also unnerf the t67.
VK 100.01 (P) too op
Yuz
@winter grotto not really. I've found that flanking and / or aiming works really well with dealing with them. 🤷♂️
you can't even penetrate the side with half of the tanks in tier 7 and 8 like wtf
Super-heavies, slow but heavily armored
@winter grotto Don't shoot on the bottom side hull.
Yeah plus the vk 100.01 p has the lowest amount of hp of any tier 8 heavy
@winter grotto if you use the zoomed in view that this game allows you to do it shows you parts of the tank that you can and cannot pen. The parts that are RED are the places you can pen.
Does anyone else think that the waffenträger auf PZ IV needs it's reverse speed buffed? Id be okay if they even took off a bit from its forward top speed and just slapped that value on the reverse speed. Waffenträger is a great tank, don't get me wrong but sometimes it's just kinda sluggish with its 37kmph average forward where even some heavies are outclassing it with speed, I mean have you seen any of the IS tanks, or can I show you the various mediums at tier 9 *cough cough t54 is the one most seen *
I absolutely love waffenträger because 276mm OF PENETRATION BOI, HIGH SHELL VELOCITY BOI, NOT TOO BAD ACCURACY BOI (you get my point) and not too bad reload at around 9 seconds, not jagdtiger DPM but it's the same top gun just configured for the waffenträger, and it has pretty good camo values so it can stay hidden pretty well . Just the speed needs to be buffed by a tiny bit
@latent copper I think it’s fine as it is, if they buff its speed you will get a similar issue they had with the Grille. The tank is meant to be a sniper thus it doesn’t need a lot of speed like heavies and mediums do.
The grille got nerfed badly with speed on blitz but it should live up to its glorious pc counterpart, a highly accurate gun on a low armoured but very maneuverable chassis. It's still viable I think but the waffenträger still needs a very slight speed buff
I don't mind it being entirely different, like how the AMX CDC isn't the best thing on pc or console but it's great on blitz but that's my opinion, goodnight
Well they nerfed the grille because it was too good, just like they nerfed the Russian mediums because they were too strong, hence now they much weaker that their “glorious pc counterparts”.
T-62A has the same dispersion as the Grille 15
even if both have 100% crew and don't have equipment and provisions
Grille has amazing aim time and shell velocity which is the reason it has good sniper capabilities
T-62A has a faster aiming time speed ._.
I'm unfamiliar with the t62a's statistics
T-62A has a faster shell velocity
Which brings me to another topic, should I get the 140 or the 62A, I'm 160k on the HEAT-54
@latent copper they are both great tanks, T62 has the better gun and a better turret but the 140 has more gun depression, that’s the only difference
Obj is more accurate when shooting on the move
@fiery flame apcr has high shell velocity, so I won't doubt it having better shell velocity but the grille fires armour piercing rounds as its standard ammunition, so I'm not sure if it's a fair comparison but I do know that apcr has higher penetration loss over distance, making ap better in some long distance engagements
My playstyle depends on the map entirely, open maps like canal allow me to snipe but dynasty pearl is a lot more suited for brawlers
T-62A than, its accurate and has a strong turret
the t-62A is bigger than the Obj 140 tho so don't expect it be able to turn around effectively in tight corners, paths or corridors
by length btw
It’s hard to decide which one is best, just get both of them and see which one you like more
Thanks for that, better armour usually means higher survivability and also higher DPM seems great in 1v1 situations
Gun depression isn't really common in russian tanks so I may be taking the t62A
Don't expect having a very good hull tho since it's easily penned by HESH
the front hull is bad
I'll get both because I love my t54 and most likely won't sell it so as I farm up more I'll just get them accordingly
Obj 140 has a very good hull when using all its -6 degrees of depression, reaches 310+mm
Which is the cheaper grind? (the one that's 5k xp less, or something like that) I don't remember the XP costs
62 is less
weird that the WZ-113 costs 200k xp to research
so does BC 25 t
Competitive tanks = the least amount to grind?
113 is competitive though
A20 is absolutely horrible
Trying to go up kv line now wg admits to it having t3 stats but yet doesn’t change it to t3? Why tho
Not being offensive but that’s easily worst tank in game and I never see any new players even get damage in it
@jovial kernel yes thats what royal said
huh. But there's plenty of not so great tier 10s at that mark too
How do you guys feel about he T-22 medium?
It is broken with that good armour dpm
I think they should buff the 17pndrs damage per shot to 190-200 instead of the current 160ish
@crystal spoke lol no, 17 pdr is weak sauce gun compared to even 90mm M3, and it's damage pattern is nothing special
@proven elbow Because you posted on the balance thread a bad game that is of you playing exceedingly poorly in a trash fascist baddie tank.
Dear DEVS, the matchmaker is not broken, but some times it is not balanced. 3 unicums against 1 superunicum with scrubs as team, that is a nightmare.
Anyway, what I am saying is you need to teach these scrubs how to play correctly from the beginning! The tutorial need to be redone. Teach new players what is the meaning of sidescrapping, hulldown, hiding behind bush, etc.. not only shoot 2 small tanks and be done with it. I swear this game has the most horrible beginning tutorial.
Oh, well probably no devs will read this. The tutorial truly sucks.
Brownjob!
Remove the bl 10 from the ISU plz
Like in pc
@ruby kite Lol u wish
Why @ruby kite
I don't mind it, it's not like the 260mm pen it's got on PC struggles to pen anything at blitz ranges
Its not supposed to be 'balanced', its random. But I agree that there should be some tutorials along the way to higher tiers. How can it be that there's so many players sitting on hills and sniping in their heavy tanks while the meds rush enemy heavies head-on and die?
Too bad ratings dont correlate with a player's stats enough so theres no way to have a perfectly balanced match
well a good rating doesn't tell you anything about their stats but a 0 or 1 star shows that they're almost always either trolling/blocking or afk
Agree on the idea about the Tutorialimprovement. Maybe make it optional with a small reward like a pz2 or some free Credits for (only) Beginners.
If Newbies get teached Basics like sidescraping they probably enjoy the game way more, since they get an idea of the complex possibilities this game can offer.
One
They should create small videos like they did for pc and put it as an optional thing with the tutorial. Add a gold incentive with each video.
@coral geode um no there was a reason it could know out any German tank in just a few shots
For the past 2 months that ive played tier x, its been a very cancerous and unenjoyable experience; what feels like most, and im definite, more than half of my games have lasted 2-3 minutes or have been complete steamrolls. I havent had fun even in a winning game. As I have experimented with different tiers, it seems the only thing that has changed has been how powerful the tanks are. Tier x is a power donkey battle arena. Today i played only 2 battles, one lasted 2.20 minutes and the other ended in my team calling me a coward for not rushing into a cap circle full of enemy tanks with the counter at 0 cap points, but instead trying to flank and play sensibly.
Even armor wont save a noob these days as he will probably got sit in city alone or just climb a hill and stay there to snipe.
The AMX AC 46 should be made smaller and the weak points at the top should be removed, to make it a more competitive tank. It seems like all the French td’s suffer from this problem
So far, it doesn’t seem to be a popular line, the obj 268 being more common in battles than the Foch 155
That's because the Obj. 268 is better at literally everything than the Foch 155 other than armor
Is the OBJ 268 better in mobility?
no but it does reverse significantly faster :p
I don't remember every stat mate, don't expect me to get everything right
Oh and also i would like to talk about the british TD line, from AT2 to Tortoise. I feel like this line lost its role in the game since the maps are getting bigger and more open, making the whole line incapable of following the team. Also jt is too supseptible to flanking since it can’t follow the team! And since it doesen’t have the mobility to poke or chase any tanks, its low alpha dmg makes the whole line, well in my opinion, somewhat obselete. I don’t know if anybody agrees but i feel like it needs a change.
Ooor maby i don’t have any idiea how to play the line wich i doubt so since i have tortoise...
Leave the at15 out of those tanks. Permatracking dpm god of tier 8
The line that leads to the 183 should be as absolutely painful as possible
Guys
I can't be the only one who thinks that the AMX 50 120 extremly needs a gun depression buff
i think amx 50 100 120 need a little bit thicker armour or little bit faster reload in between the magazine
or please just change the type to medium instead of heavy. I
The armor and mobility is totally fine, I love the mobility. But the gun depression kills this great tank. It feels like his lowest depression is in the positive area.
The gun depression is the only thing which balances the tank lol, it would be so OP otherwise
AT line simple try to snipe and wiggle
oк
What’s sad is my tanks apcr can pen hull of at tanks and there just not great armor
Why even bother to play this game anymore, looks like WG only want new players and don,t want to keep the old ones anymore, why try to play this game when all that happens is that are either put as a tier under or are set up with a newbie team, so whatever u try u lose wr anyway because WG want u to. Maybe they can give me back all my money used in this game since it is been ruined/broken by WG.
that wont happen lmao
actually if could suggest something to devs, they should make it so that a loss with "valiant effort" can be treated as a win for missions. Because it's incredibly frustrating when you try to do those missions where you have to win three times in a row, you do great on the third round but still lose due to afks or other reasons
Hello Devs can you introduce pre battle chat so everyones on game page as Asian server has many languages with little understanding
@unique scaffold It was not painful to me ,just use the at's as bulldozers and just out dpm everytank you come across
Balance the idiot population pls, then I'm doing top damage each game but I'm te slowest guy 🤦
Would be great that all the chat problems got fixed.. too many issues every single day..
100.01P side armor needs tuning
probs remove 20mm off the sides
Well while I was fairly ignorant against the lower tier rebalancing since I only play V and up, after a few months it's caused a pretty big problem in balancing the upper tiers.
@delicate socket watch your language and ...
https://media.giphy.com/media/Nx2Lx1RmLadtC/giphy.gif
Fix that issue now pls,... cant play with anyone... thousands have this issue
Restart the game
Doesnt work😂
King_Shark#9455 was muted
I think the VK 100.1 P does need some armor shaved off the sides or the turret sides, reason being that it seems like most light tanks cannot pen the sides without prammo which means a light tank absolutely has to get behind it to pen.
I know the point of light tanks is flanking but they should still be able to pen on the sides at least, I mean after all I can pen the side of a KV-4 with my tier seven Bulldog with difficulty but I don’t seem to pen anywhere on the 100.1 except the back.
remove 183, nice
@stark mica i say weaken the cupola a little bit and make the sides of the hull a bit weaker and it will be fine. Fighting one in my ru is so annoying lmao
@stark mica this tanks is meant to have strong armor
the T28 HTC is still emblematic
But SERIOUSLY, he must be BUFF, because his gun is completly useless and have absolutly no accuary, and no penetration, especially for a TD.
this gun is absolutly less good than the T29 gun
I realize the 100.1 is basically supposed to be a tier VIII Maus but it is...a tier VIII tank. I do like your idea about weakening the cupola. Honestly I think the 100.1 is more powerful in its tier than the Maus is at tier X.
After all, you can pen the front cheeks of the Maus. Not the same on the VK
That said, obviously if I had the VK 100.1 P than I would probably not be saying anything about its armor being so strong. 🥴
The VK needs a nerf to its side armour and to its cupola
Vk 100 doesn't have the side turret armour of Maus or the shape. If it angles the turret, the angled sides can be penned.
@lunar niche not in my experience.
@summer mist IMO T28 HTC is fine, just don’t consider it as a TD. It is more similar to a Maus than similar to a TD, it’s almost unpenetrable frontally (only tank that can pen it when angled are ISU-152 and HEAT-62, both broken). The bad gun balances it, and if it gets buffed then T28 HTC would be OP
@stark mica VK is not supposed to angle its turret, hence the smaller cheeks.
@lunar niche I know, I’m mostly referring to how strong it’s hull’s side armor is.
Only the bottom is strong at 240 mm flat on. Upper side hull is at 130 mm flat.
Only retards shoot on the bottom.
My main point is that it’s hard for any light tanks to pen anywhere on the VK except the very rear. With my Tier VII Bulldog I can pen the side of a KV-4 with some difficulty, not the VK.
@frozen jackal theres a difference between a tank being able to have strong armour and having a tank that if it hides its small lower plate its pretty much invulnerable. The cupola is too strong and mediums have a weak chance unless they are a higher tier. Even if you flank a vk p it can be a pain to be damaged. A tank that can be flanked and can still consistently bounce shots off the side of the hull and turret isnt balanced
@lone warren I agree with that.
@lone warren have you seen a IS7 hull down?
and?
Flank, if you are trying to take it alone, its your own mistake.
I just don’t see the issue with the 100.01. Heavies can pretty much all pen the lower glacis and cupola. Mediums probably need prammo to be consistent. And Lights have to prammo the sides or shoot it in the lower half of the rear end. For a Super Heavy all that seems perfectly reasonable.
But I’ve also put shells from Lights through the forward quarter by targeting the drive wheel outside the side skirt. And you can always nail him in the gun barrel. It’s a much tougher shot, but it will help.
Yes, I do have one and I enjoy using it. But I also don’t live in absolute fear of seeing one on red.
I don't see why a tier lower tank has to pen a superheavy, a tier higher, from the front.
The cupola is no easy pen, it really needs a nerf
@lone warren the tank is really slow and it has very long reload time, if they would nerf it's armor it would be too bad and nobody would play with it
220mm on a “weakspot” isn’t really all that weak
@fiery flame 208 mm cupola. It was nerfed from 220.
It wouldnt be too bad it would be more balanced. All im really asking for is a minor tone down on the side armour so its more in danger to a flank. Im fine with the cupola being strong and the lower plate being small if I can flank it and be able to pen it lmao
Exactly. I have no problem with the VK having the most armor at Tier VIII. It just needs a very very slight nerf to its armor.
@lunar niche when exactly did they nerf it???
@fiery flame Before their release on 5.5 The HP was reduced too.
Wait I thought it only came out in 5.5?
They were being tested before that. The HP was around 1500 or so and the cupola was the same as the PC at 220mm. IRC, they also decreased the mantlet armour.
I wouldn’t count that as a nerf, tank characteristic are always tested and rebalanced before release, well with a few exceptions cough cough keni otsu
@fiery flame How does that image look if you use Calibrated Shells? Or APCR? With the image you’ve posted is it really all that much different than if you looked at an IS-3 head on with AP from most other Tier VIII tanks?
@crimson cosmos oh boy is it different, one sec, I’ll show you
@fiery flame look mäuschen
Rebalanced is the same as nerf unless it is something like the 640 alpha guns of 150-55 mm guns.
IS3 shooting IS3 head on, with it showing its strongest armour
Now here is a KV4, same gun shooting it
And here’s the AMX 13 90 firing head on from 250m with calibrated APCR. Not too shabby in terms of number of viable target areas IMO.
Same shooter at the same range. But that’s a much juicier target now isnt it?
APCR does much less dmg, if you can only pen a tank using premium rounds I think that it is a little unbalanced, I personally think only the cupola needs a nerf, sides can remain the same for all I care
I only used APCR to show that even a same Tier Light can hurt it from the front if it needs to. You may well be right that with all things being equal a minor nerf of the cupola will give opponents a bit more of the feeling of hope. 😉
p.s. You did notice that in both your Russian tank images the shooter is firing slightly downwards on the tanks?
Camera angle stays the same, since I was looking at the VK previously, which is a taller tank, it has shifted the angle slightly. I can repost the picture but I don’t think it makes any difference or changes my point about the VK needing slightly weaker armour on its cupola @crimson cosmos
You are probably right. A 0.03 percent change in the amount of red vs green don’t mean much. 😉
I don't see the big deal. They turn like a boat and are slow as hell. On top of that their DPM is rather low.
Don't engage them. Kill the rest of the team and then deal with the VK.
VK's are only a problem if you let them play their role. They are there to soak up hits while the red team dishes out damage. Don't play their game.
@unique scaffold 100% correct. Vk100 is super OP when properly supported in a strong position but it’s lack of mobility and low DPM make it a very team dependent tank
I agree, in tournaments we normally deal with the Maus last as their dpm is appalling
T28HTC on the other hand needs a traverse buff or more HP or something. When high tier corner fighting with team support it’s tough......any other scenario it struggles. Can’t move, meh gun, huge weak spots, low HP. No gun depression. 😂
Vk 100.01 is a giant slow target. The issue is that most IS-3/etc drivers think they are a super heavy and can toe to toe frontally.
Every time I look in this chat and the VK is being called OP because it’s fulfilling the role it was built for I’m just going to repost my surprised pikachu face meme
Omg a faster tank with more DPM can’t reliable front pen it - oh no.
oh no a tier 7 medium that's known for having abysmal penetration can't frontally penetrate a top tier super heavy
Yo wassup Adolf it’s your boy Stalin here and I noticed you have these big new tanks that my glorious T-34s can’t pen and it’s really not that cool. Like cmon man, just go back to those tiny ones from last year or else I’m gonna call the League of Nations and report you.
Ain't nothing gonna stop Big H and the Blitzkrieg Boys
Yep
I really wish we still had +/-2 the amount of screaming would be glorious.
If we did I would not want to be playing the Comet
Comet was glorious in +/-2. Farming ST-I’s and E75’s. Was the only way to get aces in it back then.
all the credits you lose from the gold ammo though 😟
Stock STA 1 vs maus .-.
Better than stock Tiger vs ST-I
It’s really not. As I’ve said before, people just need to aim or ignore it. Not like it’s gonna chase you 😂
At least not effectively
Vk 100 is op against bots
_ L.Y.E discord Code: MTp2yRH ......................................................... Hosting Platform for Creators to share project ideas! Need Helpers wh...
Gives some insight on my opinion of the tank
Buff grille....
And Trashpanzer E100
@unique scaffold dude i'm sorry but i disagree with u
the T28 HTC is NOT A MAUS, and it's worse than a MAUS, it's useless in tier VIII battle
in PC it's OP because the maps are bigger, so it's harder to get damaged
Question. Where can I find old patch notes on tanks? Nerfs, buffs, characteristic changes etc
Vk100 good in sidescrape playing Maus.
It’s excellent playing E100 spamming HE at red fast movers and TDs.
It’s poor as an IS7 or alone 😂
@lunar ruin blitzhangar.com
Thanks
Dodge
kpz needs armor buff
Or you learn how to play it
I mean to be fair it's not really a great tank. It's not bad but I don't exactly see them doing well either.
How about wargaming devs consider making attachments give a bonus to the tank it’s attached to, like say: a hidden stat? And they should incorporate ERA the defeats explosive type shells for the first hit. Game is getting repetitive so adding something that requires a choice besides 3 shell selections for tank wouldn’t be the main consideration. Maybe a hit box that requires a superbly placed shot that can cause actual blinding of the player using the tank (within the game) not like a person is gonna have perfect sight in real life if they take a hit that normally takes out the crew
@civic turret it would make the game p2w, since all attachments have to be purchased with gold, and WOTB is never meant to be a "historical simulator"
I’d rather pay to win that pay to look fancy
Then you shouldn’t play MMOs, because that’s what kills games
well then gg. you can keep your believes. @civic turret nice talking to you but I think I got nothing I can say
We all know people buy things in games because it’s supposed to do something. With how things are going, what is to say WOTB can’t change? They destroyed how low tiers functioned right? I never play under tier 6 now and that’s boring. I liked derping people and knew when I got derped I rethought my approach
your interpretation =/= reality
I only play tiers 8-10 normally, and I don’t find it boring at all. Why should someone get an advantage over another person just because they shell out $
That ruins games
It would last a week before you lose you core player base, then the game will suffer, until eventually the game is shut down
Oh ok so the $500 I spent to get t22 (literally less than 200 away now) was so I only acquired something that looked cool.. ok I won’t finish it and won’t do it again. I’ll just play for free and scold people who want something that actually has a reason to be in the game because I want there not to be fantasy tanks or tanks that didn’t exist in a supposedly non history simulation and want the tanks to be “balanced” (except the fv183 of course because that’s a fair thing getting one shotted)
If I grind out all the experience I could use there is nothing else and it’s boring I’m sorry to say. Need changes and not to be afraid to make something op. Sure you can make things “balanced” but the game player base will suffer even more
It was your choice to gamble for it, no one else’s. Camos have only ever been cosmetic.
I believe what he was saying was that premium or purchased items such as tanks shouldnt give you an undeniable advantage. Your skills should determine your advantage in the game, each tank should have a different play style and advantages but also have some disadvantages so that if some noob buys it he or she is not untouchable
how will the playerbase suffer when stuff are "balanced"?
Balance kills the game
Mind blown.
To a point yes @west torrent
🤦
I want to know what part of wanting the attachments to do something besides being fancy looking means it will make it pay to win? Who says it has to do anything more than increase certain skill efficiency? You pay 1 gold to get 1000% increases in crew speed training right? Does that mean it’s made game horrible and unbalanced? It’s there for anyone with the free exp and gold (which people can earn) telling people buying gold is bad and biting the hand that keeps blitz on a functioning server
that is pay to progress, not pay to win
Make attachments buyable for credits. No longer p2w
I guess I’m saying don’t ever buy anything because people call you gold noob and it doesn’t do anything. I didn’t give my paychecks to look fancy. I want something, sorry if that offends people
I put money into the game to get my equipment, crew sooner, and to not play tanks I don’t want to
It doesn’t make me a gold noob
I choose to not care what people in my games say
Me too. I guess that means we pay to win
Paying gold already gives you the advantage of being able to grind credits faster, skip tanks you don't like, and it even lets you get away with firing more prammo because of those extra credits you're getting from playing premium tanks. Isn't that enough mate?
That’s not pay to win lol @civic turret
It’s pay to win right? That means we made game unbalanced.
I’m getting the same thing as everyone else, just quicker
No. That’s pay to progress quicker. I’m starting to think that you’re trolling
^^^
Pay To Progress
Sure helped me win after I “progressed” my skills and equipment to the max
If I can pay to get something now, or play to get something after a somewhat reasonable grind, that's pay to progress, not pay to win
Anyone can grind their crew to 100% or save credits to gear up with equipment. It's not pay to win.
Pay to win is basically buying a very OP tank that has no counters and is easy to play and be successful in. The other tanks can’t counter it and buy said tank to be competitive
I think everyone is saying the same thing here just worded different
when people mess up the conceptual meaning of Pay To Win and Pay To Progress
yeah pretty much
Yep that’s true but prepare for 50-100 games a day and months of time. I’m not arguing anymore, I’m saying this game is pay to win in levels nobody thinks of and that saying it’s a free to play game is wrong. Let me ask you, have you used gold to convert your elite exp to free exp? If yes you paid to gain something you can not do without gold, and that’s pay to win
A f2p player can’t grind to buy an attachment. The player who shells out $ can buy it. Therefore it can’t have any effect on actual gameplay
@somber mauve menaing?
Free xp does nothing but make stock grinds and bad tanks affect your stats less anyways
@civic turret that isn’t something that’s needed to be done. You don’t have to have free xp to do something
@red condor thanks for pointing out the spelling mistake
No problem.
@civic turret if you want to pay to win wait for some stupid tank like the Lupus or WZ-120-1 FT to come back on sale
^^^An example of p2w, these tanks need nerfed. Also an example of why you need balance in the game.
Except save yourself time. Good god people, all I asked was there to be a effect to attachments and new features incorporated into the RNG of shells thru new features (which I didn’t say anyone has to buy) game gets boring after a while and something that a skilled player can do to have effect on another player (even if it’s only tier 9-10)
You asked for features...
features locked behind a paywall
Alright, let’s end the topic here. Move on to another subject as I will be doing the same
Anyone that keeps the convo going will be warned
@civic turret nice try, but doesn't work against us
Alrighty, the E 50M. That probably needs some nerfs. What do you guys think would be appropiate?
essay inbound lmao
I think it’s fine where it stands
ERA isn’t me asking to pay for something. It means explosive reactive armor. And that would stop most pramo ammo like heat and he first hit. Certainly not asking to buy something. And if someone says this is not meant to be a history based game then they full of dook because I have a hafen and so so about 100 others. Either way historically accurate or not it’s a feature I recommend to dev team. So if you are playing the “MOD” you should rethink your response because I’m sure wargaming wouldn’t say half the response I got because they want a happy customer that spends money
Ah yes because we totally put ERA on WW2 tanks yep that's historically accurate
Nope. Not happening. ERA? Play WT or AW for that.
K275.AtroposLeshesis#5505 has been warned.
Look up tanks with ERA. And this game isn’t historically correct. Anime tanks??
_NoT_ClulY_#2875 has been warned.
Alright then, shouldn’t have replied to that.
I merely dropped in a reply to what he said mate, I was moving on 😦
He said it and he didn’t lie...
Leave it be
Moving on and sending your report to cs. Good day
I literally tried to go on the the E 50M being a bit overperforming when he dropped that so
@civic turret I moderate the server, I don’t work for WG, and am entitled to my own opinions. Like all other mods. Please move on and enjoy the server
It’s 45s, not that bad. At least you can write a bit
Yep, I noticed I’m in the wrong room...
idk I feel the E 50M needs to have the gun depression over the front brought back to 5 degrees, the 8 degrees over the front plus the DPM buff might have pushed it a bit over the edge
I am going but I’m saying you represent wargaming wether you do it on a server or not, you still moderate for them.
@civic turret DROP IT
@civic turret you have no idea what you are talking about, pull your head out the clouds...
He’s just a moderator of the server. He is in no way associated to WG other than being the moderator here.
AlcatrazGuardian#1182 has been warned.
Also trying to get you the player role lol
One day, one day.... 😁
So Overclocked, do ye think the E 50M needs any nerfs
It needs less frontal for a med...
Lower plate’s big and juicy enough
It's always been pushed as the most armored medium, but I feel the buffs it's been given allow it to work too well in literally every other medium's role
It’s strong, I’m not sure what to really change, but I perform about the same in several of my tier 10 meds.
E50M is good but it’s too large
I think some of the other meds could use a buff, and the E50M wouldn’t Stand out as much
What of the STB?
Well the graphs that the devs have released are revealing that it's been pretty massively overperforming
Or give the 50m less armor and it will fit in.
I actually really dislike the STB, I hate it’s gun
Lol the e50m would be trash without armor. You can already pen it through the turret.
No kidding
@red condor the E 50M is supposed to be the more armored medium so that wouldn't work
It's armor is what makes it stand out. Getting rid of that would make it borderline useless and an uninteresting tank.
@jovial kernel Nerfing 1 tank is a lot easier and smarter then buffing a bunch..
It’s fine how it is. If you think it’s really a problem you just haven’t learned how to play against it.
I know that, but the armor is a bad thing to nerf. Maybe un buff the gun depression over the front.
@unique scaffold the charts WG released are showing that is is by far the best performing tank in the hands of good players, so it's not fine how it is clearly.
Depends. Look at the tier VII tech tree HTs. They are doing quite well now when they buffed all of them
@jovial kernel I wouldn’t trust the charts, look at the T62. Its the second worst out of all the meds but I don’t think that needs another buff lol
So what, the 62a needs another buff bc a ton of people have it and don't know how to play it?
It’s one of the more consistent meds and easy to play. That doesn’t surprise me. Just saying it’s not the best med at tier 10 by a long shot
If you're gonna base it off poor winrates, then the 183 would need a buff, and everyone knows that it doesn't.
@spare basin those charts are technically 55%-65% players
WG tends to balance tanks according to the tankers along that range.
Then what would be better? Situationally the STB-1 or one of the Russians might be better, or maybe potentially the WZ-121, but the E 50M seems to be too capable when it gets shoehorned into roles that other tanks are supposed to fill, as there aren't any situations where it's a bad tank really.
1v1 against high DPM tds? 263s slaughter e50ms
E50M jack of all trades, master of none
It’s quite a jack of all trades, master of none kind of deal, bit like the M48
Oof lol
Yeah, I just think it maybe works ridge lines a little too well for a generalist like that. maybe adding back the extra step of having to turn to get the full 8 degrees gun depression would get it back in line balance wise.
Lol that’s funny. The e50m gets shedded by high dpm anything. 215b, e5, 140, 62, any td, IS4 are all counters to the e50m
E5 has bad pen though
Ah yes that's why in the hands of 55-65% players it beats all of those tanks for average damage and winrate
What. E5 has the 2nd best heavy tank pen.
E50 is jack of all trades, master of ram
I mean the IS-4 and E 50M probably need some nerfs, but nothing as massive as what's about to hit the 183
At least in comp, the E50M is a bat killer. I find that to be its main use . Especially on maps like himmels
What would be nerfed on the Is4?
It beats those tanks because most of them require a higher skill level. Plus I was only talking about their ability as a counter to e50m
Swapping back the side and front thicknesses @spare basin
You meant reverting it back to pre-buff IS-4?
What. The actual.
Why would it be necessary? The meta is full of tds that could pen Is4s if they could AIM
@unique scaffold 4th and tied for 4th with 4 other heavies..
I mean, the TDs are just kind of in response to all the heavies roaming around since mediums got shot down with nerfs
IS-4 could be rebalanced with gun handling.
IS-4 pre buff was useless. If they revert it back to that they would have to buff it again
What buff did it get?
It’s gun is really nice, armor is fine, and the pen should stay
I think the whole of tier 10 needs some balance touch ups in general with bringing mediums to be a bit more relevant tbh
Nerf the gun handling? I feel more comfortable sniping weak points with an is7 than I do with the is4
IS-4 originally had 140mm front and 160mm sides
Now its 160mm front 140mm sides, making it much more viable in battles
Wait, what.... it’s 160 on front and sides as far as I am aware
If they put it back to 140 160 it would actually be bottom tier
The 160 spans from the front to the cheeks.
The sides are 140
I feel like IS-4 gun is much better than the IS-7
I mean it does get HEAT but it's HEAT. I feel like it's alpha is lackluster.
140mm is that strip above it
It's still a large 140 patch though
Didn’t know that it got buffed, man I’m so oblivious 😑
Ah yes, forgot about that. But it’s easily tracked and damaged if you hit the right spot.
IS-4 can be pretty easily penned through side
well duh we're talking tier 10 tanks here, not some tier 7 with 148mm pen
I'd be fine if the turret side armor was toned back a little bit. I've gotten so many low pen rolls or just unlucky bounced off the flat side of its turret. But nerfing the side armor would just make it receive more HE damage than it already does, which can be substantial if a big gun is firing at you, especially since it's got no spaced armor.
I’m saying even while angled @jovial kernel
eh depends on the angle and the gun
Get autobounce angle. Hard to pen. Really good sidescraper, unless you overangle
Nope. Even at normal angles it’s penable by anything
I somehow highly doubt this
@jovial kernel anyways, how’s that IS-6 doing for you in the current tier VIII MM?
I think the lack of spaced armor on the sides and its susceptibility to high caliber HE is one of its more subtle weaknesses.
@shy wren quite well actually considering I'm top tier 90% of the time, did decently even though I played like a muppet this morning
Gg
I could even show you in game. It’s a strip on the side that is super weak. Trust me, they shoot it all the time in high level tournaments.
You mean that low spot behind the tracks right?
There is no way HE can go through the tracks?
Yeah that spot. That's more depending on RNG and range than anything. I mean you can pen it, but only if RNG lets you hit it.
Nah. It’s super easy to hit if you can aim.
Yep. That’s a typical weakspot, but it’s harder to hit it if you’re in a tall tank
If you're in a tall tank you can prolly just shoot down onto the front hull.
I know that all too well when i play against it
I'm not discounting that the weak spot is there, but at further ranges you're rather unlikely to hit those spots
If you’re in a tank that’s taller the IS-4 gets bodied. Plus you could say that for any heavy
Yea, especially things with any kind of cupola
Mk6 can suffer that as well. It already has turret weaknesses, but pointing down on it makes it an easy pen.
Hence the reason why it relies on the ridges.
I like the 215b much better than the chief. It just has too many weaknesses to feel comfortable to play.
Dealing with IS 7 is easier than IS 4 when i am driving a Maus. IS 4 has too much HEAT pen. Turret weakspot also seems smaller and trollish.
@bold dagger you might wanna post the link to the Russian discord for this guy
What IS-4 needs is that strip on top needs to be changed back to 30mm so that it has a turret weakspot
But at 30 everything can over match it
Kind of the point
Exactly. It's not very big anyway, but it's super obnoxious that it's invincible when hull down save for lucky hits to the tiny cheeks
Maybe tone it down to 45
That would defeat the point then; everything would ricochet if it were 45
Eh I think that tanks with bad gun depression finding hull down spots should be rewarded but with the IS-4 it does kinda get pretty stupid
3x gun caliber rule means anything with 135 mm gun would pen
So only TDs and like the E 100
So only TDs and the E-100.... Because what competitive needs is more TDs
Well now its nothing
make it 39 so most mediums get screwed with but heavies can pen maybe
Do you really want meds to all pen the roof though? That kinda defeats the armor. @jovial kernel i agree with that
Just so we're clear, remember this is the weakspot we're talking about (at least how it is on PC). Even if that spot is easily pennable, the armor is still very strong
But that defeats the point of hull down if the enemy is even barely above you
That's like calling the 113 a weak hull down tank because you can shoot the cupolas. Are they pennable? definitely? But can you reliably hit them? Defintiely not
Its really not that hard to hit the top of the is-4’s turret in game if you can aim, atleast to me
Mk6 needs the cupola to be shorter..
@uncut osprey I'm just asking do you main the T-62A and also have insane luck because that's the only way I can imagine you hitting something that small reliably
I use the m60 and usually if im even slightly above the is-4 i can see the top of the turret and hit it( not pen as its 75mm now)
If that was a weak spot IS-4 drivers would put in more effort to wiggle
Not many people even know how to wiggle the gun to block the turret anymore
IDC about how pubs play it, I just think it's kind of annoying how many of them there are in tournaments
they could just move the hull around a little and shuffle their tracks around though
Even WG doesn't even care about how bad players play a tank; they only look at the stats for players with a 55% WR or higher
Hence why the LTTB got butchered even though the average Joe dove head first into the enemy team and died
I killed my wr in my is-4 when i was really bad and the tank was un buffed
Can the arl v39 have its capola removed because it serves no point to balance the tank imo.
no why would we make a french tank line with good tanks
ARL V39 is basically a punching bag with a gun
When you have birthday on your first premium tank (collector now) and see how this game is balanced
Balance v.2
@lean forge Great Work!!!👍
@odd girder you're playing in the T7 Car?
The t7 car in my opinion has too little pen, while it’s fast enough to get the job done, I can seem to pen any rank I fight from the front, and the reverse speed of other vehicles is generally fast enough to make it so I cannot get behind them, but my problem isn’t speed, it’s pen; it has 27 mm of pen when the pen booster equipment is active, and the t2 light has 43, as a stock non-boosted gun. Idk if it’s just me but it’s kinda boring to see red every time I play this tank
T2 Light has 31mm pen ☝️not 43
You can't even pen the rear of most French tanks you meet anyway
I really got mad when they removed the Howitzer from the T82, I could one shot some other tanks on the enemy team and even deal tremendous damage to teir 4 tanks if I penetrate
I played that tank so much I had more than 120K combat experience on it
Oh no, i cant club players who just started the game anymore
@thick condor Do you think one birthday is clubbing?
No, i think more than 120k xp is. Read the post above
Bye T2 Light... WG killed you
How about 1-2° traverse speed buff for the JG E-100 ?🤨
how ablut buff the ISU122S's traverse speed by 100 deg/s
I want WG to add the MOL Points payment option in WOTB
Guys, I noticed something strange, how come the M6A2E1 has 200+ rear turret armour and the EXP has not even 90? The model of the turret is also the same. Is that an error from WG? I find it most unfair, since the EXP should be a more advanced and better equipped version of that M6
WG accidentally dropped a zero when setting up the EXP rear turret armor
@unique scaffold the turrets may look the same but they have different armour profiles, the EXP has better frontal and side turret armour while the M6A2E1 has better rear armour. Why, I do not know but that’s just the way it is
@iron lynxif i write a ticket to WG telling them this error, do you think they would fix it? It's simply not possible, the turret is practically the same, even the model is the same
I don't think so
It doesn't affect the gameplay much
Well, I don't think then a CDC could kill me so easily from behind when I was already engaged, from behind a rock, had I had the same rear turret armor of the normal M6A2E1, the gameplay can vary, a bit
A bit
There ya go
Computee#1466 was muted
@unique scaffold it’s not an error, it’s a design choice
@unique scaffold you talking about the EXP?
Yes I mean, It's very strange they share almost the same design and absolutely the same turret, but the more powerful armed one is weak in the backside, I simply don't find a reason behind this
Tier for tier the 7 is better than the 8
The ARL 44 needs a faster turning speed, currently it makes me feel elderly by the time it makes a 180
No, it doesn’t need a reload buff, massive damage comes with long reload.
Many players in the blitz community, mostly the good ones, have been complaining, and since I am also one of them, I decide to voice my opinion in favor of my UNI0N clan mates, and probably many other veterans in the game. The “nuking half the lower tier tech tree” move was not the best idea. With the loss of many lower tier tanks, you have many newer players that play lower tiers want to play higher tiers, since it offers more variety, which crippled the win rates of many of the veterans, me included. Also, seal clubbing is far less common now. Besides, newer players can now only draw experience from watching experienced players play higher tiers, instead of the old seal clubbers that could set an example earlier on for the newer players.
So, in general, newer players are not getting enough experience and diving into higher tiers with insufficient experience in the game, and they’re getting yelled because of their experience, which I’ve seen to rapidly grow in consistency. This causes a huge tension in the player community, and I would really want blitz to add more lower tier tanks.
Yeah WG I wasn’t a big fan of your tech tree re-modelization
gold was good for me lmao
Let’s be honest. Seal clubbers were ruining the game by using OP tanks, and getting wrecked wasn’t very instructive for new players. But I agree that deleting most of the low tiers tanks wasn’t a good idea, as there is no much different gameplay : players arrive to tier 5 and they don’t know what is a TD, what is an heavy tank...
Nerfing the seal clubbing tanks would have been a better idea
How can anyone want a 183 buff
« I’ve lost 3 games in it, pls buff »
joking
@terse summit I'd have to disagree with your statement about less seal clubbers as I've found there to be the same if not more as I've been playing the panzer iv D and most of the people on the teams I've encountered were above 7k battles
I’m not referring to ke ni Otis’s and tank’s like that I’m talking about tanks like the DW 2, the covenator (my baby 😭), tanks like that that were removed. Pz 3 was a big one. These are tanks that I thoroughly enjoyed that weren’t broken. But now they’re gone 😦
The ps iii is still a tech tree tank @terse summit
They aren't gone unless you sold them.
I agree that deleting most of tech tree was a bad idea, I said. I just said that they should have nerfed seal clubbing tanks (ie T-46, Cruiser IV etc) instead of that unnecessary change
@crystal spoke oh sorry about pz 3 my bad. Also the thing is, newer players can draw the expierience from the sealclubbers. With replay systems they can go back and watch how they play and mimic their smart moves, making better players
@terse summit the panzer3 A I think is a collector tank and yes that's true however what I ment was more of the seal clubbers are still there
Seal clubbers were playing OP tanks, they just needed to sit and wreck new players. New players had nothing to learn from those players unable to win at higher tiers
@unique scaffold not all seal clubbers played lower tanks just bc they went good at high teir
Seal clubbers played low tiers to have better stats or just fun, but it was definitely easier for them to win at lower tiers with OP tanks
5.5 did nothing wrong; change my mind
Yes but the same argument could be made about mid teir and some also just prefer to grind tanks the free xp
Or rather a similar argument
5.5, like every update, brought both good and bad changes
@crystal spoke well as long as they don’t use OP tanks it is fair. Just separate queue and nerfing classic seal clubbing tanks would have been fine
That would have been a far better change
The 183 nerf is making it less playable (which is good) but the only problem is that it’s the only Tier 10 tank that I have
@unique scaffold newer players are practically migrating toward higher tiers. And they’re getting yelled at much more often, which causes tension and more warnings and bans in blitz. Besides, the game wouldn’t appeal to more newer players. Also btw I do so wholeheartedly support the 183 nerf.
So it’s making me to play Tier 10 way less often (as I normally do)
@terse summit wdym
You want new players to stay below tier 5?
Even though I totally agree with the 183 nerf, it is making me to stop playing Tier 10 completely
Plus my credits are very low due I don’t play the game that often now due to the event
No other Tier 10 for me to play🤷♂️
183 as a first tier X is a terrible choice
Can’t argue with stupidity
True, the only reason I actually got than the E 100 was the removal of it (that still hasn’t happened, WG get the Badger into the game now!)
Didn't WG mention that they were not gonna remove 183?
There is no other tank in Tier 10 that is going to compete with the Obj 263
Bruh
Wut?
By dpm or armour
E3 has better armour. I'm getting Obj 263 though
Out of the three, which should I get: E 100, AMX 50B Or Obj 263
@orchid grove. I can't. I completely agree with you.
RIP the chat
5.5 destroyed nasty seal clubber
The bad thing is, wallet warriors can’t buy their low tier beasts and instead are running around at high tiers in helsing and t62 dragon t22 and free xping 183, and some of them just completely are not good players which is why they clubbed. I think a rating star and a trust star is needed based on wn8, and make it so@higher tiers add wn8
Or maybe allowing xvm again... then you would be able to see who to trust on your team. Although i can see why its not allowed. Targeted harrassment is a real thing on pc. Although we dont have tk'ing either
+_+
Rating battles needs a rebuild (Smh this slowmode)
Players with no experience or no brain should not be allowed to play rating battles. I literally watched a player with 36k battle with like 300 avg dmg just sit at the corner of the map and snipe the whole game missing most of his shots...
Or we can go back to 2014 where everything was better...
Agreed.
5.5 ruined the game
Technically people ruined the game
fun fact t-34-85 actually has 60 mm frontal armor
@balmy cipher 5.5 was fine.
@unique scaffold Nope. It messed up the whole low tier balance.
Not really. It created a better learning environment for new players and motivated more experienced players to move up the tiers. I have zero problems with update 5.5.
i think that it is tough for any game developer to incorporate real world armor statistics and weapon damage in to games like these. it is even more difficult when you can have three different tiers in one battle. but in wars like WW2 it was common to see Stuarts along side of Shermans trying to hold off german Tiger(2)s
@unique scaffold You have no concern that 5.5 makes it much easier for new players to enter high tiers?
Uh, That's not a bad thing?
Besides, it's not even like you play high tiers @nocturne aurora, you're just a reroll who plays the T-46 and DW2, so why the sudden interest in high tiers?
This isn't even my in game name bud.
During last 3 weeks 7 oldtimers in my clan has left game forever, new balance is maybe one reason and event another. Sad
@versed night that sucks. Sorry to hear that. WG need to start thinking about their long term players. Players who were around even before consumables was a thing. Even the new rating season. The rewards are so pointless. There is a lack of thought going into the game. And WG just don't care.
@lethal token well mate, you could not have said that better in my humble opinion...
Many do remember beta testing on both blitz and the pc versions..
And be a member from almost day one, it’s a bit sad to se how the game have developed at some areas..
They should so something like the PC version, they rewarded everyone depending on how long they've had their account
I know many players have started way before me but I started playing back in like summer 2017, spare parts were still a thing
Buff on FV 183 when?
@unique scaffold it is getting a nerf
@unique scaffold it's getting nerfed in the next update
@unique scaffold I think he is a bit confused
Oh my lord soo many salty people wanting it gone like come on
Well, it's the 183mm gun on that thing that really destorys them
But look at the Jg Pz E 100! 170mm gun with a armour that tanks can't pen normally!
Well if u want to see total 183mm gun power go play wot, it can one shot lower tier (tier 8 I think) with AP
@lapis shadow wtf, jageroo is freaken slow and it’s gun and armour makes it up for it soo what it’s not a bad tank compare to the 183
Yeah the speed and traverse makes up for it
Look the jag is fine, the 183 is a pain to deal with (or just get a good maus driver) and yeah
If your a heavy that is
Also the jag is a second line support tank helping the team even tho it’s big, slow and carry a big as gun like bruh it’s a german tank soo ofc it acts like a ht
True
If u want to complain about the jag go kill one urself and see how weak it can be compare to the 184
I have once in the E 75 with the max gun, didn't go through
Like bruh it’s not a sniper even tho it has .033 despersion rate but it’s armour and support can help, and bro it’s like a ht ofc the jag can block soo many shells
And I couldn't go around him due to the speed on that thing
I can't wait to see what the next tier X crutch tank will be once the 183 gets nerfed!
I wonder, start guessing?
Probrably the chinese td once its released lol
@nocturne aurora new players have been failing (or buying) their way to the top since day one. 5.5 isn't going to change this.
Honestly anyone over 5k games probably should not be complaining about 5.5.
Free gold? Disgusting. How could they be so bad
The 3.8 Equipment system totally broke a lot of tanks. Low tiers where never balanced for some of that equipment. While WG did cut deep on 5.5, they did remove the ‘Army of One’ tanks that caused a lot of new players to fail to adapt to higher tiers.
Let’s face it - you can’t yolo around tier 9/10 like you can in 1-5. The lower DPM in low tier tanks, SHOULD (key word should) create more team work. If folks want to $ past those tiers, so be it. We’ve always had new players in premium tanks. 2014/2015 Löwe anyone? Tank was dreadful back then and you cringed when you saw one on green.
I actually like the new equipment system with the choice between rammer, calibrated shells, or camo net verses optics, etc., because everyone in high tiers just sat behind a bush, especially TDs, and they just used camo net and optics, and would just spot and can kill everyone in the battlefield. Plus, rammer was more op back then, and the dpm was even higher with the combo of vents and rammer. Was too broken that system of equipment. I prefer this equipment system nowadays, but I hated spare parts and timers. I mean, if spare parts could be hell of a lot easier to earn, then I wouldn’t complain, but the timers were really a bad idea. Thankfully WG removes both, and rewards were given. I just love the new equipment system and hope that WG keeps it.
The new equipment system blows. Pre 3.8 was much better.
Well I hate the Low tiers Now look at the pen of som vehiegles ore the Dmg pleas reset this and make it like before 5.5
@unique scaffold well you aren't supposed to stay at low tiers for long
Mhhhhh well
But i like the t82 with 300dmg but now its shit like the other low tier tanks/players
WG probably want their new players to survive longer than sixty seconds
@unique scaffold. Language and perhaps Wargaming is telling you it's time to get out of the kiddy pool
^
Look at me i have 15000 and i was at the start the biggest noob but i learnt from pro gamer when the Go behind me when i was hetzer now noobs cant learn from other players because they are all scrubs and when the come to tier 5-6 the get fckt because the think its easy
15000 Fights*
Sorry Wargaming u make a big mistake with 5.5
And you made a big mistake for swearing...
GOLDEN_PIRATE#1506 has been warned.
T22 medium needs nerf ....tier 10 must never be p2w
Why i get warnd Wtf i wasnt rude 🤔🤔🤔🤔 Well ok Fml
@unique scaffold. Language. Editing the words to get past the filter doesn't mean they'll get past the mods.
@indigo knot E 50 M is still better
@unique scaffold RLY in wotb evry obe says this words and on the discord channel its vorbitten WTF
Your trying to bypass filter
yes game chat is a wee bit different then here..
Sorry @drowsy plaza lol
🤔
GOLDEN_PIRATE#1506 was muted
There
@unique scaffold I warned you, and several community Helpers explained to you what you were doing wrong. Instead you chose to keep doing it. Pease watch your language. Regardless of its format, it will not be tolerated.
@lone obsidian lol, their names were right next to each other...I fat fingered 🤦
u got the memo gang word ur text approprite
yes equpment system works fine pricey but effective
now i have asked numerous times .Why does clan chat go whackadoodle
@drowsy plaza i dont know sometimes where to penetrate the tank thats why I am getting frustrated
@quick lichen what do you think about is4.....OP or not OP????
4 better than 7
IS-4 is on the border between good and OP
^
if you know how to angle it its op
Still has terrible traverse, slow speed, and bad alpha if you’re spamming heat
But if any of those are changed for the better then the tank would become OP
Heavies and TD's need a across the board 2-5% nerf to their view range.
Convince me I'm wrong
FV 183 needs reloading buff
Idk about nerfing the base numbers but if you replace coated optics on them with something more useful I’d be onboard
@unique scaffold. Your idea is bad and you should feel bad.
@hidden scaffold. I'd be cool with that.
plz next update do something with 183 and finish discussion seems about 60 percent nerf 30 derp and 10 get rid of
The 183 is getting nerfd next update
I don’t know if I’ve made this clear enough but I will replace any equipment with heavy spall liner in a heartbeat
k tnks Spartacus..Once nerfed adapt
@unique scaffold my idea is good and I'm feeling excellent
You must not like the game
I like it
@indigo knot is-4 is op
Thankfully despite your right to an opinion, wg is listening to the over whelming majority of the player base and is nerfing the 183 justifiably
It has low average win rate
Which means it needs a buff
Because it ruins games
No
It doesn’t
It has a low win rate because people use it as artillery and shoot from 300m away
They hit one shot and their team is dead
It’s justifiably low
The 183 takes no skill and punishes aggressive play
So now the win rate will drop more. Happy?
Yay! The Badger!
Nah. Just stop the line at the tortoise 😂
@unique scaffold you realize that the dpm isn’t the issue of the 183 right?
It’s the highest average damage td in tier x and you want to buff its reload
@quick lichen. You left the part out where they type "jajajajajaja" over global after one shotting a low tier medium.
Something like that
It's not like it has the best accuracy. And my shells always get eaten by tracks
its the biggest gun in the game and right now its accuracy for that caliber isnt that bad. Have you seen the dispersion when turning the tank?
I guess you should aim better then
🤔 sure dude
I just play Russian heavies then never fully aim my shots so I don't get disappointed when I miss the shots, then just hit the shots anyways
👌
@quick lichen and let's not forget the premium ammo
Or idk. Play a tank that actually takes skill
Like, oh idk... the 50B
I sense some salt coming from you kind sir. My response is that I can play whichever tank I please
@unique scaffold That's pepper
How about we get a few real tanks, and loaded it with dummy round filled with paints and do that.
👌
You can play whatever you want. Enjoy the nerf
@unique scaffold. Enjoy playing it nerfed.
I'll still play it passively
No one cares 😁
sad
Sounds like a winning move 🤦♂️
hmm I wonder why Sk8xtrm literally made a video on how to not play passively with the 183
Don’t give him ideas
Players that play mostly 183 are just too bad to play anything else that actually requires skill
Let him tank his win rate
o lol
Buff the k91 ..this Tank is to Useless
"I can't get good damage in any other tier 10 so I'l just camp and fire 2 shots with the 183 and get over 1/1 damage ratio no matter what"
You’re playing it wrong if you think the k-91 is bad
I dont have kpf but I think kpf is tank that needs buff
There’s people averaging 2700+ in it
K91 is in Tier 10 Matches underpowered
So most tier 9s?
It is all about player. Instead of blaming tank and your team try to think what you did wrong in battle
Amen
All other T9 Autoloader powerful than K91