#tank-balance-discussion
1 messages · Page 105 of 1
No other Tank has the E100 Gun
What is the worst tier 9 tank? Anser: amx 50 120
As mayble fast but armor is leaking poor dpm awful gun reload
WZ-120 is worse
AMX 50 120 has great manœuverability and gun
I find that untrue,i would say the worst would be wz1-4
If u have trouble with amx120 then dont bother with 50 b.wz 120 can be annoying to play idk if its the worst.
It’s basically a worse T-54 it even has worse gun depression it has 3 degrees on the 120 mm
I had a far worse time in wz 11-4. 120 and t54 play more different so u cant consider it worst not to mention turret armor is far better in 120 than in 54
I'd be ok with that
What’s the point of turret armor when you can’t hulldown
You find a way to use your armor
U cant go ridgeline warrior but u can still use ground level hulldown positioms to ur advantage or unleveled terrain.
^^^blammo
Like the debris on himmelsdorf is a good example.hulldown positions on ground level terrain.typing on mobile ie terrible
or use it as a support tank
U cant pen is4 ufp with is7 even with apcr,but u easily can on its lfp
.
_
_
🤔
IS-7 can easily pen the IS-4s upper plate with APCR. There are some bad angles where it will bounce, but most of the time it's a guaranteed penetration.
KpfPz70 has an 152mm gun and the E100 150mm gun why got the E100 more dmg and penetration than kpfpz70 thats bullshit
@radiant plaza bc E-100 is one tier higher
Than make the KpfPz70 1 higher
@radiant plaza I don't think it would change anything
Yes i know thats the problem
Wau
🙄 not getting involved
@timid oxide KV-2 is 3 tiers lower than the kpfpz and has more damage. SU-152 is two tiers lower and has higher damage
oh yeah and at tier 9 the T30 exists
The MBT70’s gun is more of an afterthought. It’s really just meant to launch missiles at tanks and use the low velocity 152mm shells against soft targets like infantry. I’m sure that’s the excuse WG will always use as to why the gun is so much weaker than any other 150mm+ gun.
The balancing of anyone but Russian 152mm cannons is somewhat baffling.
The T49 and kpfpz need to have lower damage, but the KV-2 is balanced because of its "unique ™ " playstyle
😂
T49 and kpfpz really should bring KV-2 like alpha to the party.
and KV-2 should bring T49 alpha to tier 5
and the 183 really should be easier to spot
@tepid cipher i thought he was talking about in a covered position although many times u can still bounce the is4 ufp
@jovial kernel it wouldn't make a difference because a good fv 183 doesnt shows themselves until your ass is already grass
It should still be easier to spot regardless.
🤣 🤣 🤣 "good fv 183". That's a oxymoron if I've ever heard one.
I have a 59% wr in my 183 @unique scaffold
I'm substantially better on pc but ive only got my phone for now. consider like a fish being out of water
the fv183 is a tank that if played correctly can single handedly cary an entire team but when played poorly will miss every shot
There is no such thing as a "good 183", that's like saying I have "good herpes".
still an oxymoron
as with all glass cannons, its a very good tank in experienced hands
Doesn't make it good for gameplay in tier 10
nietjer does a kv2 make it good for tier 6 but that tank is going no where
I never said that wasn't broken
Would the su152 be considered broken at tier 7? I mean it has a huge 152mm gun but its not always user friendly.
🤔
It has 250mm pen HEAT that has 540 alpha balanced if you ask me
Well heat is expensive, and this is assuming u hit the thing.
Being somewhat inaccurate and being a directional td.
@coral tinsel nub
Lol, why? T67 is fine
It's still fine.
If anything it was OP before.
It's a TD. Don't compare it to a med.
T67 was crazy good before the nerfs. Now it performs as expected.
🤦
Lol
Before update 5.5, the Stug was the best tier 5 in the game. Second place went to the Leopard. The KV-1 was good, but it was never as overpowered as some other tanks in the same tier.
Doesnt the stug also make insane credits with enriched status? Dang
Yep. Over 200% credit coefficient; I think the enrichment boosted by... 148% or so
Crazy
The reload was ~ 4 seconds, 160 alpha, great penetration. Better mobility than many medium tanks, tiny with good camo.
Its an E25 at low tier. Well idk about now
The French tier 5 TD using the smaller gun was also insanely good. The traverse speed on the stug was around 50 degrees per second, what are you on about?
This is hilarious. The T67 is fine. It plays it's roll as a sneaky turret equipped TD fine. It's not a light and it's not a medium as such it should not be compared to them.
Hate to break it to you, but it had 150mm of penetration. With standard rounds.
I'm talking about the Stug
Excuse me tf M1a1
I think WG should buff the Ferdinand and make the Borsig 128 a bit closer to the Skorpion 128
"Stug was never the best. It was an average tank."
You're actually just bad then, the Stug is still a great tank tbh
✌
Wtf are you smoking? I wanna have some
Stug is the best t5 td honestly
I'm also a big fan of the S35
The things I see players do in-game make more and more sense as I read more posts here.
Unique what are your thoughts on the Jg.Pz. IV?
OP. Used to be the best tier 6, probably still is
It got a small traverse nerf but the dpm was left completely untouched for some reason
It's just something about having a decently armored platform that spits out 220 alpha every 4 seconds and can't be circled...
Yeah, shame the Engine loves to die
Wargaming must have thought that the Jg. IV was balanced. That's why they introduced the WZ 120 G FT as it is now.
I don't see the ARL having more dpm than the Obj. 268 @rain latch
🤣
but it doesn't have 3265 dpm
The ARL is straight trash. The 105mm was the best gun, and when that got nerfed, the tank became irrelevant. Maybe it's better now because the T-150 was turned into a collectors tank. The KV-2 is pretty strong, but not OP. Once the old 10% bonus rammer was exchanged for 7% and the reload itself was nerfed, it started to fit in.
KV-2 got calibrated shells though oof
If you told me the KV-2 running the 107mm gun was the best tier 6, I would agree with you.
It's one of them, that KV-2 turret is deceptively strong
Can't forget about the Cromwell B either
The ARL has weak armor. The upper plate can get some bounces, but the drive wheels are easy pens, the turret is soft from the front and can be HE penned from the side. It's also slow. Anyway, I must go.
Kuro Mori Mine > ARL 44
ARL has the more reliable gun, but turret’s butter. Kuro can sidescrape effectively and has a way more reliable turret.
Kuro is also 57 tons which is nice for some love taps
Kuro isn't exactly slow
IS-6 will be power creeped even more by that tank tho
A lot of heavies actually. No weakspots on PC. Either load the gold or flank it. But the tank’s long, so it’s hard to CoD.
Looks like low profile tanks could easily side hug.
That Chrysler definitely takes the title as the ugliest American tank in Blitz. 🤮
Prolly not that easy to sidehug. Hull’s not tall enough.
i love the way the 5.5 nerf ended for the toaster ~ its actually much better balanced now
and i have almost a 60% and climbing WR at 150 battles
and it kept all its hit points
Tbf, it needed all of its HP. Getting oneshotted by tier VIs is not fun at all.
exactly~ its gun is somewhat troll at tier 5 now
At 500hp, it can get oneshotted by a 122mm gun of the Kv-1s or a high rolling SU-100Y
well now stug falls under that problem
Rip. But it can’t really be derped frontally.
it seems like wargaming forgot to nerf the HP of a few other tier 4 and 5 tanks like M3 lee and PZ 3/4
My favorite Jg Pz IV story is when I ran into a good driver in my FCM. Quickly learned I didn’t have the gun depression to hit it and I didn’t have the speed to get away. You can tell how this ended. 🤣 Smart players know how to exploit matchups.
Watch this at 4:15 and then explain to me how the 183 is a balanced tank.
Buff Ferdinand and Borsig 128mm
Can't really angle that LFP against 326 AP pen without overangling the side.
That engine fire though
@hidden scaffold The 183 overmatched the armor on your engine deck it seems.
Or just got a super high rng pen roll
doesn't make the 183 balanced
Didn't say it was
good
I wouldn’t be mad about it going through the lower plate, but if you watch where the shell impacts it goes through the upper plate which doesn’t make sense at all
magic
He probably fired apcr
what APCR
🤐
The Maus is a trash, worst T10 imo
You can easily pen it's upper plate with 320 pen
IS-7 is worse because you can't angle it
At least that's useful in hulldown pozitions
the Maus needs to be angled
U just need knowledge to play against it, and that tank becomes free dmg
I wonder why it gets used in comp then
Even the T9 Mausen better
@rain latch the Chrysler K has the same gun as the top gun on the T29, a gun that already is lacking in the penetration department. The WZ 120 FT G has enough armor to bounced some tier 9 guns. The WZ isnt getting balanced by anything that cannot pen it with standard amunition.
Also watching unicums argue with newbs is funny
so is matching the Maus master getting salty about getting penned by a death star.
to be fair the Maus shouldn't be getting frontally penned by a death star through the upper plate
Lolz
you can pen the side of the mause with HEsh
like hell you cant pen the frontal plate of the maus at the right angle
regardless it looks like the 183 got a high pen role into the shot trap of the maus with HEsh
After reviewing the video I believe it was perfectly within the realm of the fv penning the mouse with AP, through the turret cheek, and that it was not HEsh based on the shell tracer.
btw if you hide the hud with the button in the bottom right it hides the red
Also it seems like it went through the gun mantlet and into the armor hole behind it
40° angle is perfect for Maus.
Actually checked back, 35° on hull gives a reliable 350mm of armor save for the lower glacis plate. Turret at 45° is perfect.
@sterile drift first of no it doesnt.Idk where ur looking at this but the chrysler does not have the same gun as the T29
.I mean it just takes few seconds to realize this 😄
It’s the same gun, just the premium pen on the Chrysler is marginally better @sullen vault
One is T5E1 and the other is T5E1A
That’s just the name difference. Gun stats are the same, save for the marginal premium pen difference between the two.
That doesnt mean anything.They are not the same guns technically and no the gun stats are different considering chrysler gets more pen.
am i the only one who thinks the vk100.01p needs to be balanced
AP and HE have exactly the same pen, APCR has only 15mm more.
Is5 is the most annoying and fustrating tank to play,it doesnt really need a nerf.
IS-5 is no problem for me. Heavies can deal against it with ease.
but i have the vk100.01p and omg its so good
@shy wren cool,still different gun.😄
Same shells doesnt mean same gun,pleqse realize that
In terms of performance, they’re pretty much the same.
"Pretty much the same."thats not a sound argument to what im refering to.
Frustrating Is5 is a understatement _Legacy..
Because shooting the sky and 10billion second aim time is not fustrating
hehe
260 pen is good, but if you can work with 245 on a T32, that’s better. At tier IX, both of them will struggle.
But ive never struggled with t32 pen nani,if u cant peb dont try to pen and go for something else but now with 260 pen can make a difference in getting better shots now doesnt it
It does, but not by a noticible margin.
It will,i dont think u understand though.oh well i cant argue anymore so lets leace it at that.
I understand your statement alright. It’s my experience playing with an ST-I with a BL-9. 265 will even struggle against some tanks. But the standard rounds is ok enough to go through some weakspots.
@shy wren The Chrysler has better dispersion and aim time as well as the slightly better APCR pen.
But why compare it to the T29 and not the T32? Tier VIII to Tier VIII makes more sense to me. 🤔
@crimson cosmos reason I compared a T29 and a Chrysler is due to Legacy wanting to compare the guns of the T29 and the Chrysler, hence that.
Gotcha.
Regarding the aim time and dispersion, that depends on the platform that the gun is on, not part of the gun characteristics itself @crimson cosmos
is2sh>> Chrysler
@rain latch have you ever played against a vk100.01p? its a little like a t8 e75 but with a weaker lower plate and if you wiggle around and keep moving a BL9 for example will not be able to hit and if youre close range you just hug the enemy
Impenetrable turret and very strong hull > IS-2Sh
But lower plate is pennable by tier VIII HTs, but not reliably.
not so strong hull, turret is impenetrable as is5's turret? ez pen. strong hull? meh...
also you dont have 400 alpha dmg or 42 max speed.
i have it too
cmon, Chrysler has only 6 degrees compares to 7of is2sh, who cares of turret armor if you cant even use that? also gg, bad pen and bad reload, lowe can overmatch it in everything
ru cereal
You can say that again
Sides are set at autobounce angles
It’s basically a Vk B a tier lower, with a more reliable turret.
Hatch is also 257mm of effective armor.
there u go
but it has a Christie suspension so it is better protection
Not really.
it balances out, it covers that 60mm of armor
It’s 20mm of armor. That same 20mm of tracks cover the sides of the Chrysler, which has 101mm of armor.
60mm of armor are susceptible to get partially overmatched by 122mm guns
@sullen vault really trying to fight the fact that they essentially have the same gun aren't you? its ok to say you were wrong.
WG sell sta Rin camouflage
I just stated they are different guns,how hard is that to comprehend?
@lean forge they start from t7?
And how was i wrong?i stated they were different guns in which technically they are.😂
u were not wrong ..point has been made..
I always get a laugh when im on wotb discord.
true that _Legacy
just remeber kidos, it it doesnt have good p/w it must be a bad tank
Vk 100.01 has bad p/w ratio, doesn’t mean it’s bad.
in my opinion the vk100.01p is really good
for some reason its my first tier 8 cuz im a noob
Saw this suggestion from Reddit, it would be nice if we have the TOG I. Suggested it to be a tier V premium.
We need more stupidly long tanks, like the TOGs and the Char 2C
Only if all the guns work. Otherwise it’s just a TOG with a Matilda turret. And where’s the fun in that?
Armor of TOG at tier V is more effective.
TOG 1 should have the 45 dmg gun of the Matilda but with a 20-round autoloader
jzmalexander#4205 was banned
IS-5 doesn't need a nerf. It needs a rework to it's kit.
Lowe needs a nerf however.
@tepid cipher Crusader, that StuG score is not that good, Vk 30.01 P is still stronker than Jg Pz IV. @jovial kernel Kuro sucks
"Kuro More Mine sucks" 😂 it has a 200mm gun mantlet, 8 degrees of gun depression, very good armor when top tier, somewhat mobile, decent gun
We need buffed Vindicator
If Vindicator had 30 sec reload but 900 dmg, that would be OK
how about no
I think having the KV-2 as a nuker is enough.
that could have been a one shot for gods sake
@hidden scaffold bit late but probably went through the 180 mm hull slant which becomes like 220 to 260 mm while angling the hull.
Weren't the hull slants 200 mm in the pc before the buff to 250 mm?
@jovial kernel What are you talking about? Good armor? Decent gun? Are you sure you aren't talking about Vk 30.01 P?
Kv-2 isnt suppose to shoot the place you aim anyway.
@coral geode the VK 30.01 (P)'s hull armor can't be angled well and isn't very thick
Vk 30.01 P faster than almost anything
Because it is so fast, combined with vastly superior gun handling, any situation where the Kuro stalls, or doesn't get first shot, the Kuro will lose
anyone can reliably pen the 30.01's hull, it takes a somewhat high penetration gun to tag the Kuro
100mm vertical.
At a tier where even the light tanks have 120mm+ pen.
vindicator should have its own battle room as well as all other fantasy tanks
Dumbest thing I've ever heard. Get over the fact that this isn't ww2 simulator and you have to face those tanks
@unique scaffold No its one of the most brilliant idea. I hate seeing Tiger 1 and lupus in same atmosphere.
Then you can go make your own game and see how that turns out. There aren’t that many people who think us history/tank buffs aren’t closet Nazis. You can only make so much money at that point. By including these godawful tanks WG opens an opportunity to get more players from different games, and keep the game afloat.
If it bothers you that much to see these tanks in game, perhaps you should consider making "real" tank only training rooms.
Variety is the spice of life. Just like you don't want a street full of kebab shops, you don't want battles to be full of dull predictable tanks. Also less chance of food poisoning on the battlefield
well u enjoy ur goofy tanks then
thought was put out dont need ur neg opion saveey
As long as the fake tanks are balanced (example: O-47 and Hafen) I'm fine with them
@jovial kernel And for some reason half of them are disguistingly op.
annoyingly
Which gives me another reason to hate fantasy tanks.
I only have one service,and I can’t log in on my phone and on my friend’s phone I can log in idk y
Review_NA region.
Try redownloading the game.
I did
Hmm.
🤔
You probably got deleted, don’t worry it’s just a game
-DONT Update your iOS device to 5.6.1! It's a broken client and shows only a dead review server. If you got an Update for World of Tanks: Blitz even tho you have 5.6 installed, ignore it to avoid login trouble.
Already updated it and it’s just fine and dandy for me 🤷♂️
Some people will experience login issues. Best not to update.
Wonder what the update was even for..
Ironically bug fixes
I see.
Plz buff Mod One frontal armor, I couldn't bounce an IS-6 unangled.
;^ very funny
Buff T28?
no, buff T28 proto
I actually like the T28 proto. I hated it at first but now I really like it. A lot of my highest dmg games. The regular T28 still feels pretty whack though. (it is totally possible I am just not good with the regular T28 though)
I mean, just remember if you hate a tank, it could be a Ferdinand.
T-28 has to be buffed! The reload is way too long and the pen is terrible!
What, the T28's reload is actually good enough for tier 8...
T-28 only too slow ... reload good armor very good
@violet burrow There are some misunderstanding here. @barren field talking about tier 4 t-28 which is right. You gıys talking about tier 8 american t28 which can use armor buff in my opinion.
Oh, forgot about the dash russian tank version sorry
The Russian/Finnish T-28 should in my opinion get a better gun
Like the fast reloading T34's peashooter
Löwe doenst deserve a nerf cuz his gun is already good but his side armor is weak last time i got 1k dmg fomr su152 shootin he on my turret
WG nerfing a tier 8 premium? Lol
Give T28 the real model like IS-3 got. The current one is basically a fake tank lol 😂
I don’t know what the fuss about 5.6.1 is all about. 🤨
I’ve had no trouble with it (yet?) and it connects me to the regular NA Server. And I downloaded it from the App Store before WG’s servers had even come back on line. Did I just get lucky?
@gaunt coyote Agree. Real t28 is basicaly a 2 tracked t95 instead of 4.
The Löwe was buffed at least 1-2 buff’s past reasonable. The 2014/15 Löwe stunk, but now it’s powrcrept way past the Tiger 2
I don’t play it anymore because it’s my second most played tank - but sadly the vast majority where before the last two buffs
Play tier 9, you don’t see the vast majority of fantasy tanks - just a bunch or paper drawing tanks
Vk 100 and Mäuschen should count for mousebane medal
hehe
Lol yup
maushmouse is hard armor
Well that was helpful...
I updated my game like yesterday
Why does it cost so much to research the Ferdinand?
Type 62 is too underpowered needs 1500 alpha on HEAT
because it's a potato, relative to the JP2
Ferd circa 2014/15 was a beast - at least they always looked so red to me.
pretty sure in 2016-17 at come point it got overbuffed then nerfed into the ground
I think the advent of fast tanks in 7+ killed it. Then they overbuffed earlier this year and draconian nerf’d a month later
Ferdinand was great when I played it in 2014 because the superstructure was invulnerable to tier 7-8 AP and even some premium rounds if you angled it right. Now just about everything can pen it with AP so it’s useless in its intended armor role and the JP2 is the better option in every category
Probably because the higher pen tanks rolled in. I can't play anything with bad pen from tier 8 onwards now, I seriously can't stand the T-44 and the T-54 ltwt
@hidden scaffold why didn’t you platoon with me?
I got roped into a Hoi4 game for 10 hours
But it’s all good cause Axis won and I made Hungary great again
Wz111 can be easily penned these days
@neat yew t54ltwl is a light tank and it is doing good with its pen
plus it doesnt need a lot of pen as it can easily go around the tanks or on the back of the enemys with its on move cammo
T-54 ltwt is a better medium wym
How can someone not stand the LTWT???
https://orig00.deviantart.net/d63b/f/2013/088/b/5/this_does_not_compute_gif_by_cliopadra13kaassis-d5zn5su.gif
I can cuz I've never played it
Lots of the slower lesser pen meds in 8 have been left behind in the powercrept zone.
at least the ltwt picks up the slack in mobility unlike the "proper" tier 8 meds
pershing cries in the corner 😥
big oof
its sad to see an historical tank like it left behind makes me sad
Meanwhile FT is more historically significant and got deleted
Idk what wg thought about it but yeah. Its wierd
One shot. Is balance is needed? (On the red narrow shows 634 damage is false? I had 1500 hp)
your ammo rack blew up are you new here
Every tank has the ammo rack in a unique location
Your ammorack’s in the front.
Wow, thanks
Also I couldn’t stop laughing at your comment that the kpfz 70 needs balancing because it’s too good
literally the worst tank in tier 9
KVs have ammoracks in the rear of the turret, Germans have ammoracks on the sides, Chinese tanks are made of ammoracks
Well that’s not true that it’s the worst. But it’s certainly not very great. Nor balanced
No but russian tanks are made of fuel tank, British tanks are powered by infantry and yea Chinese tanks are made of ammoracks, oh and japanese tanks use origami paper especially the green one as armour
@wide bloom Who puts ammo in the front ?
Most British tanks and the Leopards
And the Russian mediums who literally have the ammo behind the fuel which is in the front so no wonder they get ammo racked so easy
Ammo im the front? Probably useful for tanks that would want to run away. Ambush and then GTFO kinda tanks. I'm not a tank expert though by any means
You've gotta put ammo somewhere. It took a long time for tank designers to take the ergonomics and survival of the crew into account. Also keep in mind that some cultures did not value the lives of their soldiers as much as others.
Also consider that in many cases the front of the tank is the most heavily armored spot. It would make sense to hide your ammo behind as much armor as possible. Especially when you consider that much fighting was planned to be done from dug in, hull down positions.
..... I know everyone here has troubles like this. This actually needs to be adressed.
What did you expect? That's the side of an IS-8. You know the sides of that thing is made of pure black hole.
And this one as well. Track HP is too much with the "new" equipments you can add, now this is starting to happen literally almost every battle.
@jovial kernel Dude this has happened with me with light tanks like the T49. not just IS8... I mean look at that. And the part of the IS8 that is the black hole is the side skirt, not the bloody tracks!
You do realize that track hp is just the damage before it breaks right? Tracks are just 20-40mm of spaced armor. It's spaced armor mechanics that are broken, not tracks.
But they never changed those mechanics. why is this happening to me for the last 5 months and not the last 4 years? THIS IS NOT SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN.
It's happened to me for the last 4 years I don't know what you're on about
Bullshit. Whatever, I'm done with this if no one will believe me, just wait till WG realizes its an issue in the next year and changes it, trust me its all in the track health.
I never said it wasn't an issue, I just said that it's not a new one, in other words it's even worse because WG still hasn't fixed it.
Im not calling BS on that you think its not an issue, im calling BS on the fact that you think this always has happened. its not.
It has for me so idk
@unique scaffold Ok that I have an issue with.
Fuel is actually a fairly good deterrent for HEAT shot and shell fragments
Tank designers have long taken into account ergonomics and crew survivability.
There are simply things that are not physically feasible.
For example, for a human loader to quickly reload the gun, there must be
ammunition placed near him.
Whereas an automatic loader allows for lesser difficulty.
Modern NATO tanks often make use of fuel tank armor, and turret bustle stowage
has it's own problems. For one, it's very difficult to armor the ammunition
compartment so far back. For a second, it limits total ammunition stowage.
I recently read a book about tanks pre WW2. The comfort of the crews was scarcely considered. This book contains interviews with the tank crews and the stories they tell are nearly unbelievable.
That was the the point of my comment.
problem with autoloaders is that you suddenly can't have a reliable system while having blowout panels
That is a broad and likely ineffectual statement.
German tanks for example, were ergonomically designed, Pz III is one such example. While WWI tanks that may apply, it's not as if the designers deliberately did not consider, rather, they simply lacked the technology. @jovial kernel Lol no.
tank crews are very bad at providing an objective opinion of the weapon they are using.
you do need a far more complex system to have blowout panels with an autoloader though.
The truth is tanks did take into account crew ergonomics, and this carried into many WW2 designs. This is seen in the T-34, the Pz III, and the pz IV. Admittedly the Pz IV then proceeds to jump off a cliff as it gets upgraded but you can scarcely blame the tank; blame Krupp for producing bad tanks
Russians caring about ergonomics during WW2 🤣
uses hammer to change gears what was that comrade?
The fact of the matter is, the Soviets did, and indeed had the more ergonomic tanks of the war. One must simply take a look at the crime that is inflicted upon the Churchills gunner to remember that a Sherman isn't the average. There is no basis for that claim
I mean the T-34-85 was an improvement on the ergonomics but the early T-34 had a 76mm gun that was cramped into a turret basically designed for a 45mm gun
I'm going to be honest here and I don't mean this as a cop out... But I've had an exhausting day and I really don't feel like getting into this discussion right now. Maybe an hour or so ago but now I'm done.
well see ya then 😃
Early T-34 has some rather fair ergonomics. There are some issues but that is to be expected of a prototype tank. 1942? model was the main production model of the T-34, and really by that point the only thing you really can complain about is that the Soviets have slightly more awkward observation devices. Remember, only by 1943 did the T-34 actually achieve outnumbering it's lighter Soviet compatriots, like the T-26, T-70, etc
Also a turret basket probably would have been nice for the T-34-85 crews
Many tanks lack turret baskets, like the vaunted Centurion (obese as it was), it's really not necessary
Turret baskets are however nice to have. It's not necessary but it is a help
You can just pretend to have one by using chairs
Also with the T-34-76, there was an issue as the Commander was often stuck with being the gunner or loader, and couldn't be looking outside as much as they could with the much improved T-34-85
model 1942 says otherwise :/
It was still dealing with the fact that the turret is based off of one made for a 45mm gun and the gun is now a 3 inch gun
I don't believe that's really a problem
How is that not a problem? The gun suddenly takes up about 2-3x as much space inside the turret but the turret is the same size
If said gun is very small in the first place it's not a problem. Tanks aren't perfectly optimized for X gun, designers can't overturn the requirements
Remember this is the same tank that carried an 85mm gun in a larger turret version
That's a much larger turret though, about twice as large if you compare in photos. You're dodging the issue of the turret being too small, as they just tossed the old turret out the window in favor of one based off the T-43's which was designed for a 76mm, was still about twice as large as the T-34 1943 turret
Guys don't blame the black hole, blame Stalinium
or wargaming could just attempt fixing their broken and dying game
I want the historical FV4202, 240mm turret armor as well as the gun the FV215b has that it was supposed to carry
historical 4202 was also made out of soft steel (so it couldn't repel shit), and only had 20 pdr, FV-215B is a british hiistorian invention, and the hull armor was 76mm
too bad WG doesnt care about historical accuracy
4202 hesh is so expensive
HESH is actually a really weak ammo IRL
I have the 4202 and all I run is hesh and I lose over 100,000 credits each game even on a win that I do 5000 dmg on.
Should they add a M1 Abrams tank with DU as ammo?
??? this game is based sole from World War 1 to Viet nam
Ehh what about all the fake tanks they have added?
they added fake tanks too on PC
Abrams is way too advanced,its not just the ammo.
After Tiger vs Abrams video, some of you still request to see another WW2 vs Modern tank scenario. So this is the last time I do WW2 tank vs modern, because ...
Original M1 Abrams versus T-62 would allow T-62 to actually butter it at all ingame combat ranges, and it's 40mm UFP (extreme slope) would be over matched by quite a bit. Portion directly under the gun is vulnerable to >220? penetration or so, and the entire side is vulnerable to overmatch
The Abrams would basically play like a pre nerf IS-7 with a better gun
No it'd fly around the battlefield like a god. MBT-70 is actually a hugely over estimated vehicle in this game though
Yea
I forgot the part where it goes a good 15 kph faster than the IS-7 and has a better power to weight ratio as well
Real life MBT-70 has tinfoil for armor, so much so that it's even more vulnerable to the IS-7's machine guns than the Leopard. It's kinetic shot is pathetic and likely only slightly better than the 105mm L7, and it's autoloader can do what? 5 rounds per minute?
tinfoil for anti conspiracy
The MBT-70 was a crappy unfinished prototype that was built apon to create the Abrams
Well that's not completely true but the Abrams's design was heavily inspired by and based off the MBT-70
It's too bad the poor Abrams would still be getting rekt from over 2 kilometers by a T-64B, whose turret it couldn't penetrate at point blank range
depends on which abrams you're talking about because there's the M68 (knockoff L7) versions and the DM-1 120mm smoothbore ones
No even the 120mm was struggling against the T-64
And it's well known that Russian tanks love flat small turrets with almost invincible turret fronts
Even the UFP was a struggle.
That's every MBT tho
The T-64B is like 40 tons. the Abrams is over 60.
We know that Russian tanks are small and light okay
T-64B can handle a higher sustained rate. It also likely costs much less. Because it's so much lighter it's much easier to handle the repairs of because the components themselves are lighter
That's um not how repairs work as there's more parts to it than component weight
Try to fix the tracks and tell me which one is easier to repair.
I wasn't talking about the tracks but ok
Powerpack? Gun? Lights? It's design is just more conductive to being fixed with less 'work'
Also with in field repair, an extra crew member (loader on the abrams) is useful. And I'm just saying that weight isn't the only thing, as space inside the engine bay, complexity of parts, size of parts, and multiple other factors matter in how hard it is to repair things.
At which point it gets even worse for the Abrams 🤣
To be honest that's completely true the Abrams is known to suck to work on 😂
Challenger II must be a pain, it's really good at ripping off it's own track pads
Challenger II's only strong point is the armor packs literally the entire rest of the tank is outdated from the older weakened power pack to the rifled gun
Don't worry, it's armor design is actually not very good so it doesn't even have that going for it
Well it's above average
Probably better than Captain sketchy Leclerc
aka probably costs too much
40mm mantlet KE protection says hi.
wait did the BP ever get nerfed?
N
O
so isn't that big Boi still running around with mad dpm?
It’s op and yet still forgettable
just like the Jg.Pz. IV
You know this extremely balanced thing
Game is dying, nôobs are becoming ever more present throughout all tiers. Wg do something about it or Blitz will end up like Wot pc...
Well they could make the IS-3D able to reload individual shells in 12 seconds oh wait
I think noobs keep games alive. players who are hostile to noobs kill games faster
yes
Ja
Da
@jovial kernel auto-reloader that can pump out three shells when the first one has the longest time and the rest have a smaller time to reload, SO once pumped out 1000 dmg you just become a normal IS 3 which has a hidden talent
yep that's what I was referring to
Buff panther 2 and panther 8.8 please.
oh yes please and Centurion 1 while you're at it
can you guys buff me up irl already WG? im lately not doing well with this my main
yes buff me to be Watea_23
Centurion 1 is fine. Play it to its strengths and it is decent
You sure you don't want a tank you like to be better? Personally I much preferred the Caernarvon which has similar mobility but has the armor and dpm to really be scary on the battlefield, along with some health too.
The mobility isn't even close, and the turret on the cent is good enough if you use the gun depression. I have had both tanks. Either way, asking for a buff because you like the tank is ridiculous...
Not that I particularly loved the centurion 1, but the centurion 7/1 is another story. My god that tank is amazing
@atomic hound Cent 1 is trash. Speed is horrible, hull armor is non existent. Turret can be easily penned from turret roof. Dpm is trash for such a low alpha gun. Only pen and gun handlings good. No wonder why it has second worse winrate in tier 8 tanks.
Actually in my experience on medium flat ground (almost all ground in the game) the Caer only lags behind the Cent by like 3-5 kph
Centurion 1 is absolutely fine. The hull is trash, fair enough, but if you're hull down using all 10° of gun depression, that turret roof is autobounce, making the entire turret very strong. The DPM is enough to get the job done, since the good pen, aim time, bloom and accuracy, combined with that gun depression allow you to use 100% of that DPM effectively. Compare it to other tier 8 mediums, and most of them also have trashy hull armour, with a couple of exceptions, but none of those tanks have good guns (and often worse DPM). The tank has a low winrate because the majority of the playerbase sucks in tanks that require a degree of finesse, which this tank does.
With the Brit tanks the 20 pounder on the Centurion I is good enough for a Medium. But it’s just so underwhelming on the Caernarvon. Don’t get me wrong. I actually really like both tanks.
But the British “feel” on the Caernarvon (meh mobility, weak hull and high-ish pen / low alpha gun) has been such a horrendous victim of Tier VIII Heavy power creep that I’m starting to think it needs a bigger gun to get back on par. Would I love it to be the 105mm L7? Duh. But even the 32 pounder might be enough to take it from Medium hunter back to Heavy tank status.
Caernarvon is fine as is, the Cent I needs work. I find myself playing the Cent I once a month to pad Wn8 but it’s not a very competitive tank when frankly the Caern does its job better.
bc 25 t is oc bad as X it worst tank in 10 tier please buff it
2.5 second inter clip shot like other clippers
If you buff the worst tank in the tier, another tank will become the worst tank. Then it will get buffed too,
powercreep
Yeah, buff bc. It needs 400 alpha per shot and atleast 200mm more armor🤣
It needs an 183mm gun with a 50 shell magazine, with 0.1sec between each shell, 1 sec magazine reload.
Also give it a maus engine
@atomic hound indien panzer has better hull and turret armor, alpha damage and dpm better all for a little less ap pen.
they both have 9cm guns though
Indien has 225 alpha while cent 1 has 190. And thats not enough indien has better dpm. And oh not to forget cents crappy 40 kph speed limits.
oh, when you mentioned the Indian I was thinking of the Pz.58 Mutz, because that's what people compare the Mutz to
Im comparing indien with cent.
after I maxed out the Centurion it got kinda boring
Indien is a little too strong, imo, but cent still has better gun handling, only 60 DPM less, and better effective power/weight ratio
Cent cant use its p/w ratio because of its crappy top speed. The tank wants to go faster but limit doesnt allow it.
@slender briar Cent has to use its gun depression to make it turret roof bounce. Otherwise it doesnt bounce.
🤔
40kph gets the job done, since it accelerates to that speed very quickly... What can I say, it doesn't ruin the tank at all
If it was changed to 45 or 50 kph with no other buffs the Centurion would reach that speed and have a real noticeable advantage over the Caern
If I can manage rank 6 on EU over 30 days, and I'm not even close to the best players on the server, it's not a bad tank when you get the hang of it.
I mean on NA we have the WZ-120-1 FT and Skorpion spam and both of those can nail a shot clean through the gun mantlet if you sit still for a half second
So don't sit still... Both of those tanks are ridiculously overpowered though, so go figure
It's not the problem with OP tanks, but rather that tanks with high penetration get spammed all day on the NA server
@summer notch I send you invite for friend
Nice
@lean forge
1.You are playing on one tank 2.You need help to team mattes.
Do you think that i do nothing?
On russian server i thinked there is noobs but when i helped we winned
Seems like only one game had meaningful dmg
That is on the EU server. He is Pole which is the main complaint of EU players.
But one problem on Europe server little number of players is playing
5-20 players in waiting
Ye rex i do 0 dmg im noob my team do all my work . oh teams are good
All we do mistakes.
@pseudo frost do you try switch off this?
We all are on 50% we arent pro or noobs.
If thats the only one control mode or smthing switch i keep it off alltime
21k players on Eu and rex thinking that there is 20peoples waiting
You know that some players are in trainings and Raiting battles?
I dont mind waiting if its worth to
I need wait 1 min to enter battle
What tier do u play
omg he is........
On 8,7,6,5,4,3,2 Im not playing so much thats why i havent tier 9 and 10
Ok do you have less than 5k games?
@odd girder
I have 2 200 battles and i dont need tier 10
do you play on pc or mobile?
On pc and phone.
Ok the matchmaker tends to put -5k battles and +5k battles in diffrent queues
The mathmaker cant get me in battle when 20 players are waiting on 6 tier
switch on wotb on pc in setting switch off control setting
I have that phone and pc gamers can be in my battle
Try playing with a platoon mate so the matchmaker puts you in the +5k lobby
Wait i will enter in game.
this game should be put on the nintendo switch
I disabled it
okej now play battle
That could either go great, or terribly.
I don't think there is an inbetween for wotb switch
ok
How would that even make sense playing wot blitz on Nintendo switch
It doesn’t that’s why it appeals to him
i will not buy a switch just for 1 game
It'd probably be a loss first game
I just think some more players would be nice and the Switch would bring that
it could but its still a chintendo not a playstation
the Switch has rather nice specs for a mobile device, better than most phones
@atomic hound What you say about the Centurion 1 is a great argument starter. Also, I think what you say about the tank and the needed finesse to play it properly are correct. Lastly I believe that the Chieftain/T95 is a very similar vehicle in terms of armor and dpm. The turret of the Chieftain/T95 is also an auto bounce from the front except for the huge commanders machine gun, and the tank's turret has great angles on the turret followed by 250 mm of effective armor near the gun mantle. The gun on the tank I think had some were around 10 degrees of gun depression, so, if you play the right way it can be OP.
@solar flicker argument starter? Also, whilst the cheiftain is similar, that hatch really does massively affect the way you play the tank (I don't have one, I'll admit), but the centurion doesn't have this issue when the roof is at autobounce.
I do think the Centurion could use a top speed buff to 45-50 like it did on pc tho
It is a rather strong argument to call a tank OP. Specially Chieftain/T95 as it does not have the bestest of dpm like usually low caliber guns have. For an example RU 251 and Caernarvon.
Chieftain/T95 has good mobility, but not amazing as the engine is rather weak. As a result it turns better than very big and slow heavies, but it turns slower than the more mobile heavies such as IS-3. And Chieftain/T95 does not have a lot of armour at the very front of the hull (well in the hull all all araund the hull) unless using gun depression which is what the tank is supposed to do. BUT there is no hills in every map to use this amazing feature or at least harder for the less experienced playerbase that has managed to get a hold onto this one with the recent bundles and offers including it.
I am not saying that it is a bad tank, I personally quite like it. But I can not call it OP by any means as it has weaknesses too.
In my opinion it should get more DPM or a bigger gun with the same reload rate.
Tier 8 chieftain is hot garbage in practice
Most players trade shots with higher alpha heavies
Get out brawled by meds
because they're idiots
And don’t use speed
It’s a support tank
But I don’t see why I would ever play it
It’s a boring playstyle
And you can’t legitimately use ridgelines
I’ve played mine 2 times maybe?
Yea it is not very effective as you are not a frontline tank, but you are not a pure sniper. And in ridges you still cant trust the turret as the HUGE little egg at the top is weak indeed.
why someone should play the chief t95 when you can play the amx m49 😂
I mean it's a hull down tank that needs to keep moving for hull down to actually work so of course it struggles
It should get like either A. Mobility buff or B. DPM buff or C. Both.
IN my opinion
I am fortunate enough to own one and I will say that the machine gun is a very big week spot, and it is large but the chances of an enemy hitting it when you are utilizing the great dispersion for snapshots it can be benificial
I think it should have better gun handling so moving around to keep the cupola safe doesn't mess with your accuracy as much
@unique scaffold could you not?
It just needs that little bit more love that is all
Read the server rules
he dont even play the game e a freind so dont kick him
if it means watch the wording yep
Now I want to ask that we get back in the topic 😊
Chieftain/T95 should get something that makes it a bit more special am I right?
@quick lichen some tips for arl44.... I am sucking in it....and traverse feels bad
@quick lichen would like it to have more traverse speed so it would not lose so much speed while turning as the sides are very weak so the risk of getting circled would be smaller. And DPM indeed would be lovely
seek shoot hide on 44
You need power to weight for that not traverse
It does need traverse speed too tho
I just would like to have a more mobile heavy with a deacent turret. And a pew pew gun
buff both, improve terrain resistance
OK, I am off thanks for the chat!
Anyone else feel the Tiger ll is just to bullied?
yes
I'm more introrested how the tiger 2 new side skirts gonna look
What are you talking about @trail veldt
Didn't in the event info say something about side skirts for different tabks @atomic hound
Not that I've seen
Hmm wierd could have sworn I saw something about side skirts
Must have read a different update at some point just confusing
I've reread everything new must have acidently clicked on an old one lol
They should increase Chieftain/T95 gun damage from 250 to 300
This? @trail veldt
@solar flicker they could buff it's apcr rounds,and traverse speed
Do you guys think that WG should give the T-62 A it’s 115mm gun? I think they should because it fits in better with the medium line, which are a bunch of tanks with decent turrets, but higher than avg alpha for a med (T-34-85 at tier 6, T-44 at tier 8)
nah fam that 115mm would put the 121 out of business
121 would still have that 122 which still shoots with larger alpha and it has a better armor profile
@visual nimbus oh yep that
Problem with the Chinese 122 is that it habitually low-rolls (pretty sure it’s weighted to do that)
also the 115mm would have way too good pen for a medium in this game
Just change the pen then. It’s not exactly hard
we still don't want a tank filling another tank's role but better
But the medium with higher than avg medium alpha but not quite heavy alpha has always been occupied by that line since the 34-85
It’s textbook that line’s role
If you want a line that makes no sense look at british TDs
Let’s not start the 183 debate
what are you wanting to change a 115mm gun on the T-62 A nonono
Yeah, and then give the 140 back it’s apcr and heat
I'd prefer the 140 keeps AP
^^ AP is the best ammo, and the 140 has none of the disadvantages of using it (laser shell velocity)
The T-62 would be interesting with the 115mm, but awful for one main reason: the gun could not be depressed or elevated period. Not talking 2 or 3 degrees here, we’re talking 0.
Nah fam it would get like 3 degrees down 15 up
In real life* Obviously I don’t think it would be functional to have no angles in either direction
I don't think you realize, the 115mm smooth bore is the historical gun of the T-62 @cursive flower
And it would work just fine in terms of elevation angles as it's actually a modified 100mm that was bored out, similar to the L7 being a modified 20 pdr
Hm, I’m probably confusing it with something else then. More than likely.
Wuat
is there a buff for vk72 next update?
that thing sucks in armor and dpm and too slow to not have side armor
If WG want to balance anything balance the amount of sliver you actually get for winning or losing. Based the earning on the players dress and etc. Like War Thunder doesn, win or lose. AND NOT on how freaking well your teams does. That one reason this game is starting to suck hard, players are not reward like they should be even when they done well yet still LOSE! I just fought a battle in the Vk. 36. Whatever it is and lost with two kill on my part and 2nd on the team and yet I win -sliver. This is jacked UP!
FIX THIS DAMN GAME!
@limber wigeon play the t49. That thing rakes in the credits
Lol
Don't have and not enought silver hardly to even play 3 battles or 2 per day.
@limber wigeon that’s barely anything, and you lost. Losing implies you lost credits and that you should strive harder to win. If you win that game, you would’ve won credits
I yell at people when I want things too
@limber wigeon you honestly shouldn’t have a problem making credits in tiers 5-7
glad im not the only one who likes yelling in anger when i get pissy
Honestly progress towards higher tiers should be slower. More than 50% or tier 10 don’t know basics. How about literally winning a specified number of battles with at least a specified number of damage. Requirements can be low. Literally can’t be hard unless you’re trying to lose
@limber wigeon that type of economy system would only promote selfish behavior where players are not trying to win as a team. I believe this would also promote greater toxicity within the community.
Is there even a teamplay in wot/blitz? Lol
I think that there should be a bonus for actually doing good, even when losing
It is almost like there is on already...
@valid gust hi
yes?
aight, will do. sorry about that. want me to remove it?
We have our own youtubers here that are quite good and don’t bash the game. You’re content isn’t really wanted
No, I’m more than happy to balance you
aight dude. best of luck to this game 😆
Thank you
np
I actually personally really like when people are honest and bash the game
There’s a difference between criticism and bashing
bashing is severe criticism
Bashing is criticism
bashing is one form of criticism
And sometimes well deserved, Blitz hasn’t justified it yet, but they are a Chrysler K and Defender away from getting a Jingles Paddlin
We’ll have to see how Blitz balances the Chrysler K and Obj. 252U. We can’t simply call it the Defender as there’s another tank with that namesake, ie the IS-3 Defender.
The Chrysler has weakspots that weren’t mapped out from what I know, and the 252 is just a buffed IS-6 or five or something
Maybe closer to the IS-6 than Is-5
@summer notch 252U is worse than you think on PC.
Imagine IS-7 levels of armor on a tier VIII. That’s how tough it is.
Chrysler is practically immune from the front from lower tier guns.
Note, these tanks are broken on PC.
Ah, so T-32 with its turret armor on the entire tank. They are broken no doubt, but I swear the chrysler had weak spots on the texture but not in the armor
I just want everyone to sit back and remember that the T32 has better turret armor than any tier ten’s turret armor. God I loved that tank
That’s true. They’re not actually weakspots.
Exactly, now if they were made into weakspots, would that make the tank tolerable?
Too small for weakspots though. You need to be pixel perfect to shoot them there.
Alright
Nerf the VK100P plz
Buff 72.01k
I agree the tank is too weak right now side armor is trash you cant even sidescrape with rear turreted tank the gun is terrible way worse than e100 gun and less hp than e100 is just a worse e100
Nerf ms1
oh wait
its not even there anymore
@unique scaffold wz 113 dsnt need a nerf the travers on it is so shit it actually needs a buff, worst heavium imo in terms of travers
@unique scaffold the side armor on the turret needs a buff. You turn it even a tiny bit and it can be penned by literally everything.
The wz 113 is fine as it. The slow traverse is the only draw back considering its upper plate and side armor is on par with the is4s AND it has the Joint highest dpm of any tier 10 heavy with the fv 215b.
if you dont use a tiny hill the wz113 upper plate is garbage and you should not compare it to an IS4 since that thing is broken
@zealous stone I own an is4. It's not as broken as most people think. And having fought both I'd actually rather fight an is4 since it lacks the dpm of the 113.
and is does not have 120mm of side armour thats just a thin stripe right betwen the turret and tracks rest is 80mm
The same can be said about most other tanks. They only use the thickest armor thickness on any part of a tank to tell you what its armor is.
Did you not see what I typed?
And besides. That doesn't take away from the fact that it's a damn good tank that in my opinion has an upper plate capable of challenging the IS-4s. You put even a tiny bit of angle on there or wiggle just a tiny bit and people will struggle to pen.
the upper plate is only good if you keep a dostance if you do face hugging it bevome ubsolet
the tank has such a low profile that ppl can just aim over you into the upper plate
Whatever you can believe what you want. Until you've fought them both dozens of times in random battle with all sorts of tanks and had the chance to own one and play the other a few times you won't realize how broken the upper plate on the 113 is.
Notice that I've said owned one and driven the other. All it takes to make the upper plate near impenetrable is a small slope, a slight angle, or some wiggling.
i dont think a 2° in travers buff would hurt the whole meta
2° really wouldn't do much.
So, which is the better choice, Wz or IS-4?
Trust me it would, would turn just like an is7
@shy wren according to ruck it's the is4 but to me it's the wz. Guess it just comes down to personal preference since they both have monstrous armor profiles. While the is4 has better sides and traverse the wz has amazing dpm.
IS-4 generally has monstrous armor all round, while the Wz has a much stronger turret and frontal hull armor, from what I heard. Lower plate is much weaker on Wz tho, but if you can hide them, both of them are monsters in their own rights.
Why are we even comparing them
why not compare maus and grille
Is4 has far better armorn than the 113,113 turret is far weaker than the is4 since u can just heat the cheeks.113 upper plate is not that strong really,if u angle up ofc it can be strong,like any other tank with decent hull armor
WG needs a filter for training rooms like you can make one with only mediums in it or you can select only which tier(s) you can use to enter training room
113 upper plate is insane, only reasons not to drive the 113 are weak lower plate and garbage traverse
And turret
@jovial kernel i wouldnt consider 113 upper plate to be insane at all.its weaker than most hulls of heavy.
@lean forge im sorry for calling you but the game in my phone seems to be “unresponsive” I drove my ltwt but for some reason it’s moving by it’s own and can’t traverse it’s turret, I checked my ping it’s at 59, please fix this, I lost so many games because of this
The second a 113 is slightly angled down, the upper plate is useless @jovial kernel
252U armor vs 340 HEAT pen from tier 10s
yeah we totally need that monster in Blitz
Good thing heavies in blitz can have 374 heat pen 😉
It’s the same thing when people ask for Japanese heavies. No thanks
vs its own AP
I've been playing my 252U a lot more recently, its so ridiculously armored that it can tank shots from tier 10 easily and punish said 10s harshly because lel 440 alpha
Yes these tanks are needed in blitz.. i need to be able to stomp everything without them even scratching my paint.. yea no thanks too..
tfw even the paint is made of liquid stalinium
Got to sport that solid red camo my friend.. cant be called the red army without.. dont want to go to gulag
Serb's goolag
gotta fund that WG mars base after the successful funding of the moon base with the feast bundles
👏 wg
Wg did that?
@noble chasm if you not sporting for yourself, you wont get high exp mate, I think you only shoot the people who gets spotted by the IS on your team
Bro look ať team every game i got this
Try to spot more for yourself, and track the enemys so you team can shoot this tank! You'll get a ton of Exp!
Hey fellas. Anyone got some thoughts on the T95E6 they wanna share? I'm interested in it, kinda. Looks like a poor* man's Chieftain Mk.6, or a real bad T110E5. I'm probably wrong tho, lemme know.
Some people think the cupola is to big
agreed. Bigger than my Tier 8 Chieftain's. Big ol' head titty.
It looks like the Chieftain Mk.6 but really bad
It might be better than the Mk6 who knows 🤷♂️
It's not gonna be better with a huge 25mm tumor on it
yeah, that's what I was guessing. 158/125/53 turret armor. Chieftain is at 364 frontal turret armor with a substantially smaller head titty.
That tumor hitbox is not really set in stone yet
And you can’t forget about Chieftains massive lower plate
the Chieftain's turret isn't actually 364 that's just one tiny spot the turret is actually 250mm sloped
Also the T95E6 has a similarly weak and large lower plate to the chieftain
Chrysler K needs a massive nerf
Oh, didn't know that. As for the cuppola, if they cut it off I could maybe gamble for it in hopes it gets an armor buff later, but at this point it just looks subpar to every other tank it compates with. T110E5 outdoes it and so does Chieftain. That turret armor is just a touch above the STB-1's.
And the Chieftain can't be frontally penned with 75mm HE while hull down
Also the T95E6's lower plate weak spot extends to that flat middle 114mm plate
so it has similarly place weakspot but they're just much more massive
Personally I think the E6 could outperform the Mk6
The side tumor is literally as weak as the cupola roof
really? When i look at the size of the thing I just doubt it. Not against experienced players :/
To make it even worse, the side of the turret is an autobounce angle so you don't even need to actually hit it to go through it
Wooooooow. Side tumors too, huh? Didn't even notice those in the inspector lol. That's just hot garbage man, that's not out-doing anything
To be fair we know close to nothing about the E6 and the stats aren’t set in stone so we’ll have to see and that little side tumor might not even be a hitbox
it was spaced armor in 5.4 but they made it solid in 5.5 for some reason
It’s literally just a viewport it doesn’t make sense that that would damage the tank
It's not even a viewport it's just there
heck it man. I was really looking forward to it since I missed the Chieftain but I'll just free exp an STB-1 at this point. Better turret armor and mobility anyway.
I'll tell you something, British tank drivers are gonna love meeting these and HESHing them frontally while they're hull down
everything is gonna love tearing that thing to bits, everyone and their mother can pen 🙄
You guys haven’t even seen the tank in action yet.
Just looking at it the STB-1 and M48 have better turrets
I have. There's leaked vids out there. 2, to be exact.
If the tumoris modelled, the tank is trash
I’ve seen them too but it didn’t show much at all
the cupola is decently armored, the tumor is a huge oof
Well, it can’t be much worse than the release of the W(allet warrior)Z-120-1 F(ake)T(ank) I’ll take an underpowered over an OP tank in the meta any day
@rancid flame Well that's why the T-22 exists buddy
Not to worried about the T-22. Just aim, and the armor magically disappears. It's all angles
I mean...I romp around tier 10 in a 268...basically I point at anything and shoot and it’ll pen
You people all forget that this game has RNG
@rancid flame Nah fam the T-22 when properly driven gets covered in autobounce angles all over
and that it moves like a med
Lol, then I just HE splash it for 400 dmg and call it a day
👌
They can’t make that part of the hitbox it’s just ridiculous and doesn’t make sense.. must be a mistake
but look at those double tumors lol, what kinda clown crap is that.
I think its pretty obvious wich is the better one😂
In the first i used claibrated that the image without cal
With or without nothing changes just saying
btw the side tumor stopped being spaced armor update armor inspector or check blitzhangar
Oh that makes tank even worse 😂
The Mk6 with the Royal camo hides the hitskin decently for players who don’t know it well enough.
Shhhhh
This is the 5.6 version and you can pen the frontal plate
The E6 looks like it has been covered in aim here signs.
I find it odd WG didn't remove the side bubble. It exists on the tank model on PC but isn't something you can pen, kind of like T29 ears. Maybe those apps are wrong and that side thing can't be penned, we'll have to wait and see.
Those are data files they cant be wrong sadly
Well the side tumor was spaced armor in the 5.4 armor model but they changed that for some reason
I like how people are complaining that Wargaming sells tier 10 tanks to noobs but here you guys are complaining that the tanks aren’t good enough. Make up your minds.
Why can't I see that color coded page DD
Noobs shouldn't be buying any tier 10, let alone underpowered ones that make them even more useless.
So why should it be practically impenetrable
I don't know, but last time I checked every tier 10 can pen the T95E6's cupola, LFP, and CFP
You are suggesting that they shouldn’t.
I'm only up to tier 8 not just premiums.
I don't think that a 75mm gun should frontally HE pen a hull down tier 10 heavy
Don’t bring up the hull after referring to the cupola.
^
It already has a cupola that all tier 10s and most tier 9s can pen, it doesn't need to be HE penned in the turret frontally by tier 5s
🤔
The side tumor won’t be modeled I don’t think
It wouldn’t make sense
If they do, no one is buying it
It won’t matter. The e6 will be as meh as any other Western, non German, Tier X Heavy. Nothing but a series of weak spots that utterly negate the advantages of decent gun depression.
WG has no interest in making ANY US tank as dangerous on a ridge as a Russian or Chinese tank in the open. Look at the turrets on the 59\Patton and the T95E2. That 50mm difference is just stupid.
The e5 is plenty dangerous
^
I mean it's almost like the 59-Patton literally has an M48 turret as the name suggests @crimson cosmos
With the cupola
well it is the historical M48 turret with the cupola and 90mm
How many complaints did it take before they removed the cupola from the 110E5? How many more will it take before they do something about the one on the E6?
The game will probably die before then if we’re going by that
E6 cupola isn't really that weak tbf
Is it comparable to the old E5 or tougher?
Can’t wait to get HESH’d
@quick lichen Side tumor is modelled and its only 25mm. Everything can pen it with he rounds.
E6 cupola is about 220m, not enough to block tier 10s but will stop many tier 9s
@deft owl sure. I doubt it stays
He pennable heavy from the front? I don’t think so
Funny thing is side tumor was spaced armor, top tumor was much thinner. With update 5.6 they changed it to this.
The picture below is old model.
And this is the new model.
yeah they made it solid this update for some reason, it was a decent tank before but now it's terribad
I didnt understand why wg classfied this tank as heavy. The t95 chassis an medium tank chassis not heavy.
yeah it's a medium on PC and has better armor lmao
If you scratch your head over this, don’t think about the k91
You guys... judging a tank when you haven’t even seen its performance. smh...
Kv5 front turrets need a armor buff. Many tanks can easily pen them.
@visual nimbus well it does say something about a tier 10 "heavy" that can be frontally penetrated by a BT-7 art. when it's hull down
@red condor such as?
Many other tier 8 and tier 7
Don’t get me wrong, I love the kv5 due to its weight and speed. Very good ramming ability. Just have to hide the turrets or wiggle the tanks a bunch.
@jovial kernel Again I don’t think that view port will be part of the hitbox. it just doesn’t make sense it’s illogical
Lol what tier 7 is penning it frontally?
Type 62 HEAT lmao
The comet cries in fear
...
...
Something wrong there?
nothing ... noobs cant understand that...
Just because there are two type 62s and a drac doesn’t mean it’s not winnable
^^^
Honestly surprised the kv-2 and su-152 got zero dmg
Prolly got nuked before getting their shots off. Happened to quite a few KV-2s that I’ve faced.
This channel for balance
The WG know nothing of balance
They only know how to fill the game with bots
Kids and bots using 121B
hate it so much
Played a few games today, didn't see a single 121B 🤔
Same actually.
This is how u balance
Pls someone tell me how to fix this problem!!!!
Win
Lol thanks
Ok this is gonna be long because i can only send 1 message:
Can someone please fix the premium system?
Currently any player can buy any premium tank at any time. This in turn creates a lot of players who have like 1k battles and a 121B or an IS6 .
Can we have a system where to buy a premium tank, the player must have, for example, 3 tanks of that teir each with maybe 50 - 300 battles depending on the teir.
This would mean any player with a premium tank is at least relatively familiar with tanks at that teir and would reduce the number of legitimate noobs at high teirs.
Thanks - get this to the game devs and please point out any major issues with my idea and help me gix them i would love to see this implemented in the game
Yes your major issue is wg loves money like LOVES IT 🥰. So making requirements would mean lees money. Thus wg does not want to do it.
Yeah fkn sucks
Indeed. Unfortunately there is no way to stop “nubs” from buying high tier premium tanks.
Loll Batchat player here xD Im just a silent reader
Batchat doesnt need nerf its an op tank if u can use it xd
M3 lee is op
Lmao
Valentine is better @modern fern
@shy wren no u
Bah, poor comeback from you. I expected more from you.
K
This channel is about balance not mm. Please complain about mm somewhere else.
reminds me of a game i had ages ago in my 122-44 where i lost and got more XP than the top guy on the enemy team lmfao
On my way to gt 7 kills in damn 4 years (cz the frust year i was an noobie with 53% wr) but all that 4 FREAKING YEAR they kill stealed me. I remember the worst one i was with kv2 told to me teammate "let me make 7kills please" but he killed the last enemy and the said "sorry" me: TRIGGERD
I had a friendly KV-2 intentionally sit in between the last guy and me so i could get my 7th kill one time. I was a one shot so he ate all the hits for me
Mine was worser cuz i told to him let me make 7 kills. The rest one was just by me bad luck
the thing about epic medals like that is it never hurts to ask your team to let you get them but its hard to be mad at them if they dont give them to you
Me extra mad and angery 4 years still no 7 kills medal for an 58.35% wr guy with 15k battle... shameing
i think i've only got 7 kills once
Not related to balance.
Lol ikr
I hate to dump it on them but maybe some of the Mods can clear out the drivel? Balance is too important and complex an issue without having to scroll through posts about bad play and stupid banter.
(Was that pompous enough? I can do better if you’d like. 😉 )
Scavenger seems op and I see people with 5 battles with it
Low tiers became boring
That’s why
I know I youtube so I record them sometimes
Hey if u developers are reading this, can u PLEASE undo the tech tree changes from update 5.5! I find that very few people like them, and the low tiers are almost unplayable now! And buff the pen on the M7s' 75mm M3, because it doesn't make sense how the M7s' AP has worse pen than, for example, the M3 Lees' 75mm M3 AP pen, they're the exact same guns!
Please...
And I noticed that the KV-2 was needed again... what gives? It's already bad! You don't have to make it worse!
Nerfed not needed... I hate autocorrect...
KV-2 wasn’t nerfed
It’s just people
Buy hacks or provisions to make the tank so it can’t miss provisions and hacks should be gone
Kv2 was never nerfed...
Hacks don't exist. Provisions are a fair game mechanic.
use provisions eats up creds
Ots slightly pay to win
dont need em if ure crew skills r maxed
but do make a difference thats why ur option to buy
The improved fuel is a must... That 10% engine power buff is massive. (I run full rations and fuel on everything, but the fuel is especially important)
@scarlet cargo ?? Its for credits. If it was for gold than yes
Well how do you make credits effectively without premium time or a premium tank
there are a lot of tech tree tanks that make good profit
Ik its an option to do full provisions and all but it cost 10-20k per game to run and gives you slight advantages for spending those credits then it comes done to how you get credits again
Don't use them if you want credits and stop crying here
wana make creds no consumables or provisions
Why is there tech tree tanks with such a bad credit coefficient ? IE JgPzE100 with 65%
tuff battles but fun
2.8 is why
What happened in 2.8?
they reduced the profitability of most tanks but reduced repair cost of a lot of high tier tanks
think ammo cost has gone up??
most tier 10 tanks were 20-25k to repair
roll ur garage x2 then start over reset make good coin..dont auto resupply
More unbalanced russian copycats smh
Lol Kv-2 literally have better he pen then jageroo he pen. Yeah totally fine
UC-2P is worthless now, they reduced the DPM and took out the apcr and HE shells. also the loading time is to long for an avg 60dmg shot
now it is a worthless TD, no provisions so speed up the loading time and only 1 repair kit for an turretless TD.... real good balanced for the newbies,,,,, NOT
Every tier 2 got reworked and rebalanced
Keep in mind that the UC is no longer part of the tech tree...
All tanks have the same loss of provisions, etc
It’s still balanced in its tier. There’s just less complicated stuff in tier 2 now
Makes it easier for new players
like i said a TD with the same avg dmg as other tier 2 tanks isnt a TD anymore
A lot of guns alpha were reduced
the TDs are not TDs anymore. they should have more alpha prt shots
tier 1 and 2 should have AP and HE rounds. tier 3 and higher should have APCR/ HEAT rounds.
and why is that complicated....? we all have learned to shoot with all kinds of ammo in tier 1. newbies shouldnt cry so much and learn the game by watching youtube
So an object 263 isn’t a tank destroyer because of Vk 72s and E100s?
I think you over estimate a new players desire to learn the game. 20% of new players stop playing blitz after 10 battles. I’d argue over complexity has a bit to do with that
th obj263 has full options of consumables and provisions. also more alpha than some other tier 10 tanks
New players just want to shoot things and blow stuff up
Both German heavies have higher alpha than the 263
not the leopard
HEAVIES
Alpha has nothing to do with being a td
There’s a trend of having higher pen and higher alpha
obj263m has a faster reload. it does in tier 1 and 2
Well no. There are no tier 1 tank destroyers
your right my bad. no tier 1
Tds in tier 2 have higher dpm than the mediums
but against tier 3 you need the apce and he
Maybe against a pz 2 j
also the amount of ammo is to low. you cant kill all 7 tanks. cause it takes 7 to 10 shots to kill an full hp enemy. also take in consider that not every shot is a hit or a pen
If you guys looking for a trash t2 tank look for t2 light.
30 clip damage with 6 sec reload. Its awfull now.
i think all low tiers are bad now. give newbies a better tutorial and the first 25 battles in a training room with other newbies
@elfin marlin No. Pz3 is op now.
realy? i sold it long time ago.
Yep. Good armor good mobility good gun.
The Panzer III was already really good before the rebalancing imo.
That being said anyone played the 50 M? What's your opinion on it because I'm incapable of making my own opinion on a tank I even have in the garage lol
50 M seems boss rn
50m solves every problem the e50 had
I think it's a very good tank I just can't play that well with it. Considering switching to calibrated shells like I did on the Type 61.
You should definitely switch to CS. Why run rammer in TX?
I usually run it on tanks with capable guns like the IS-4, that being said if I'll get another tier X it'll probably have CS
Impenetrable upper hull, trollish lower hull, great gun, decent turret, good gun depression, and fast=e50
Probably gonna play with it next week with one of my friends and we'll see how I can play it then
@neat yew E50m maybe has very good top speed but it has the worst p/w ratio of all tier x meds.
OOF
Russians
whats up with all Russian shit getting camos
and yet one of the best looking tanks in the game the Leo 1 still doesn't have a legendary camo
and neither does the Tiger 1, one of the most iconic real life tanks ever
and neither does the M4 Sherman, ditto
^
You are one of the ppl who I have explained this to before
I distinctly remember having told you this multiple times
I would like to see more camouflages for different nations
@unique scaffold what not working for WG or the camos?
We don’t work for WG which means there is absolutely zero need to tag us
And again, you know this
yes i know this but where else are we supposed to give feedback than the official server? Or do you guys not listen either
literally just said not my job
we're not the people you talk to about feedback
so who do we talk to about feeback?
unless its feedback that can help us mods carry out for our volunteer work
WG. PM them if you wish or ping them here
🤣 ur funny. I DM'd Ribble on November 3rd. Nothing. Also aren't the forums for feedback? How is that going?
creating another way for them to ignore us and then have mods that say not my job doesn't help in the slightest
wow look at that just pretend nothing was even said
I would ignore you to when you behave like this
wdym I asked Ribble a question about the server and was highly complimentary. Either he doesn' care or he is never on. Now I'm asking about the camo imbalances. Get frustrated by the lack of answers. I'm sure nearly every other player would agree with me.
Please explain why this is ignore-worthy
Remove the 183 = bliss in T10 😂
Realize this: Ribble likely gets hundreds of messages a day. He physically can’t respond to them all.
And to spell it out for you because you can’t seem to understand: the mods are here to moderate (look up the meaning of the word). We keep the server clean but are just players like you at the end of the day. This is your final warning. dont ping moderators again for something that doesn’t involve server violations that require our attention @dense walrus
If someone is behaving badly or posting inappropriate content, please tag us. Other than that, don’t use the tag
😄
so why can't players like me become mods then? And I disagree about Ribble. Who does he actually answer, forums or Discord?
Because Ribble doesn’t know your character
well i was msging him about that
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Like it's one thing when people play any other TD, but when people play the 183, it feels like they all suck
You can disagree all you like, at the end of the day like I said, you are just one players among hundreds of thousands. A drop in an ocean. Ribble (or anyone else at WG) cannot possibly respond to every single players feedback
Just how the cookie crumbles
seems to us drops in the ocean that unless ur a fancy mod then they don't respond to us at all
It's no fun when you see two every match
apparently veteran players and average players dont matter. Also @rain ivy stfu
@dense walrus Dude, just chill out, legendary camo will come for all, also, this is balance discussion, I'm in the proper channel to say that the 183 is unbalanced
bro will it really? and if so why not distribute then evenly instead of Soviet-Soviet-Soviet
Use common sense. They put them on popular and new tanks first.
So, make the tiger 1 or (insert tank here) popular, and one will be made.
Right now it's been Russian, Russian, Russian because Russian tanks are the most popular
Yes its terrible russian dominated every player see this = unbalanced also seen in Camouflage content
tankeatingtiger#1750 was muted
Does my logic make sense guys? 🤔
It's amazing how wound up someone can be and how it can take away their ability to be polite
Sounds logical to me, @rain ivy
Though it's not just been Russian tanks
I'm wound up about the 183, but I also work as a cashier 😂 👌
No, it's been others too, wasn't there a Chinese one and I forget the others.
Wg distributes them about evenly, but prem tanks and tier X have priority
One of the funniest things, I actually hadn't played much Russian vehicles until this past year
So since this year's blitz fair is less than stellar for my taste, I might pick up the T22 med
Good luck =) hope you can get it
When all else fails, spend the cash lol
I really want the E6, but it doesn't look like I will be able to get it with how it's set up. So I think I can get the T22
But thanks for the vode of confidence @worthy basin
I honestly just hope wg made it possible to get it for free. But since it's wargaming and the prize is a tier X tank, I highly doubt it
Same, though I was really looking forward to the auction this year. But it seems they decided to do major changes to it, so we'll see.
You do know he can’t respond to you right @unique scaffold
@unique scaffold read up
@quick lichen like the new logo, should use it year round