#Discord discoverability and searchability

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

tawny pewter
#

Hi community (and mods specifically). Over the years pretty much all community conversation has migrated from Discourse/Slack to Discord. This is great for a number of reasons but there's a big gap in terms of public discoverability/searchability. That manifests itself in at least two ways:

  1. a lot of publically searchable information is very outdated
  2. searching Discord isn't super fun, and it's very difficult to do programatically.

TBH i don't really have any ideas for solving item 1 however I have recently been working on a "deep research" style agent search for my team to use using specific sources and i was thinking it would be really nice to allow read-only API or MCP access to this discord server so an agent could parse through all the threads/channels for help understanding a specific topic (e.g. migrating from ember-cli-mirage to ember-mirage or straight to just miragejs, or migrating to warp drive, etc).

Thoughts on that? Would the mods be willing to allow select read-only bots for this purpose (i have one basically ready to go with just read message history and view channels scopes)? Other better ideas for exposing Discord data more broadly?

ocean light
#

I'm a fan -- but also, I want to expose everything to the public anyway (at least the public channels)

I asked the mods about this a while back, but got no response:
https://www.answeroverflow.com/ ?

cc <@&480472562761990174> ❤️

#

would your MCP be public?, @tawny pewter ?

tawny pewter
#

my plan was just to use an existing MCP (or not even use one at all and just use the API?) with a bot token, but adding the bot is what requires perms. I think i could make the bot public but i dunno how bot tokens work tbh, like if the bot is allowed, can anyone make a bot token for that bot and the nuse it on their own MCP?

ocean light
#

and I think if we let users opt in to being recorded here, that's pretty good

tawny pewter
#

yeah answer overflow seems like it would probably solve both problems pretty well? if problem 1 is solved then problem 2 definitely is. so yeah, seems perfect and way better than a bot lol

earnest phoenix
#

Admin/mod here. I’m conflicted about automatically surfacing discord conversations into additional spaces on the web with no way for our users to opt out, even if those channels were “public.” I feel like nobody can say yes on behalf of everyone.

That said… It helps that AnswerOverflow has a per-user consent process built in. IMO that makes it a viable option. I would want the core team to weigh in.

I feel like there’s still some risk with adding these kinds of tools, but also there’s risk to doing nothing, in the sense that ai powered tools will theoretically do a worse job at Ember without this info. Then, devs have a harder time.

#

@ocean light do you have any info about AnswerOverflow that helps on the trust front? Like who is building it, other major orgs/companies that use it for professional purposes?

ocean light
#

(last commit was 7 hours ago)