#lore-and-universe
1 messages · Page 212 of 1
he said "All engines, reverse thrust!"
That answers that.
I guess the implied statement is "all forward-facing thrusters which draw power from the engines, reverse thrust."
that's a pretty major thing to leave to implication
Unless there's someway to reverse the thrust of the main engines.
I recall Star Wars Episode III having a ship that could do that
But I mean, the reason I say that is that "engine" seems to have pretty direct correlations with the rear thrusters.
It put large covers over the engines so the thrust direction was reversed.
During that opening scene when Anikin and Obi are crashing
Well, Warfleet does say that UNSC fusion engines use "thrust-vectoring plates and magnetic fields to increase manoeuvrability".
I assumed that just meant directing thrust in a typical thrust-vectoring way.
Y'know, pointing your thrusters in different directions to do stuff.
Infinity's engines aren't fusion, afaik
On the destroyer page this is, btw.
nevermind, it is fusion
"The superheated exhaust is redirected with thrust-vectoring plates and magnetic fields to increase manoeuvrability".
That can't mean it could, like, transition its thrust the opposite direction. It'd be ridiculous.
You could probably re-orientate thrust, like, pretty far off to the side though.
Well, this is probably case-closed.
I do really hate situations where you can't take visual representations as true canon, though.
Fusion powered reupulsor
Répulsor
For
Infinity. The boeglin fields engines it has. They’re not the standard engines
I see
Hey
:)
I'm reading Halo cryptum and I'm extremely confused t some things
I'm at the part where the didact and the others leave the cryptum on a space ship
What ship is it
@fair hazel
:o

The planet-breaker?
Okay. So in halo 5 the arbiter has a tattoo on his arm with the arrows pointing down. Is that a symbol of something in the halo universe?
I assume. Though I don't remember seeing that symbol anywhere else.
I think it looks really cool. I kinda want one like that. But I just wanted to know if it meant anything.
Probably something from Sangheili culture, or the 'Vadam house
Perhaps marking him as the leader of the house
It’s Sangheili encryption for “ I miss the old Elites”
To me, a a certain Johnson quote that almost certainly can get you trouble feels like a fitting response. (Also yes. I tried fitting what Kat said before Operation: UPPER CUT)
Don't shake the lightbulb?
Nah. One of the ones from CE. Idk why it was the only thing that felt like a fitting response.
"This is it, baby. Hold me."
Lol let’s just go with that one.
I honestly don't know what your post from twelve minutes ago is in response to.
I thought it was the Regret quote he said in Halo 2 (it’s in the intro cutscene to Outskirts)
Underrated quotes are the Johnson Speech’s in CE. Which I don’t quote cause their so long and brutal
One of those quotes was the one I was referring to lol
It’s like Chill Johnson
gimme quote
Sorry. I like being unmuted lol
I've got a personal inbox too.
Just look up the Mission Pillar of Autumn Transcript. I’d rather not get my comment deleted or Muted
Does it involve dumb bugs?
Maybe.
Something something choking on blood
Yeah dang Johnson was Brutal. No Chill on Legendary
When he joined the UNSC, his platoon only had a rock and two sticks. The former of which had to be shared.
But was their a pool of their own blood to drown in?
No armour, no firearms, no food, no shelter.
Just a rock and two sticks for forty people.
My philosophy is if you have even the littlest advantage no matter what it is, Using it to its full us can. Greatly pay off with determination to successes even with little to none advantage of that something. Like a rocks and a stick.. Its something. no point crying about it lol
make due.
Well if your getting fired at with bullets, there ain’t much you can do with two sticks and a rock (that is shared amongst 40 or however many a platoon is).
Guys. I can't find any info on the arbiters tattoo in halo 5.
It's driving me crazy.
Yeah, what we see in-game is all we know of it.
That bugs me.
Usually alotta care is put into small character details.
Also. Where did chief get the big mark on his chest plate?
/when?
Back in Halo 3 when he crash landed in the jungle
Coz like. That mark has been there ever since. So I thought it was significant somehow 😂
Well, it ain't in Halo 5 since he got new armor.
Ah
Is the infected San'Shyuum in the Gravemind cutscene in Halo 2 the Prophet of Regret?
It is, he even says his name
Was he not killed by Chief though? How come he ends up there, alive?
I played Halo 2 ages ago but my memory is failing me now
😄
The Gravemind is using his corpse to help prove a point to Arbiter
Chief did kill Regret, but the body was still fresh by the time the gravemind got a hold of it, so it was able to partially absorb it in a way that revived Regret and let him keep a sense of individuality. Though he was still technically Flood
That’s why, when regret speaks in that scene, you can hear him struggling and seemingly in pain
Now they are
He does seem to be in massive pain
So he basically gets brought back to life so that he could be slowly killed
And terrified
Continually re-absorbed into a hulking mass of decomposing flesh and FSC
At the time when players first see that scene, while it is scary, in a lot of ways Regret deserved that punishment
I'm pretty sure all of the three prophets had it coming
Primarily for being so dumb he didn't look into the matter further after he found out the whole reclamation thing was
Not only was Regret largely responsible for the near-extinction of the human race, he also lied to his own followers
Uh
Truth got let off easy, an energy sword through the chest is a lot better than being slowly consumed by flood
Not valid
Not exactly
Well it basically is
The whole covenant religion was based off of a false translation
The Forerunners were our space daddies all along
They thought the forerunners went on a Great journey to become gods
This was because of a translation?
And that the age of Reclamation was the change for worthy followers like the covenant to also become gods
I always thought they just made the illogical assumption that dead = transcended
Well they also made that
However, mendicant Bias revealed to the prophets that the glyph they thought meant Reclamation actually meant Reclaimer
And was in reference to humanity
When was this, more or less?
In the novel Contact Harvest
Hah
A mod
Stung by their own hornet
Anyways basically it happened when the Covenant ran into humanity
There was a whole thing with the luminaries
The devices the Covenant used to track down Forerunner tech
The existence of humanity as the inheritors to the Forerunners disproved the prophets theory of all Forerunners becoming gods
Well specifically of the notion that the Covenant could become gods.
And so the three prophets we know and hate hid the truth
From the Covenant perspective, it would seem that humanity were intended to ascend.
Wait, that was ||Mendicant Bias aboard the keyship in Contact Harvest?||
A fragment of him, yes
Was that from CH or was it revealed in the Forerunner Trilogy?
The same fragment they stashed on High charity and snuck its way onto the key ship
The fragment was always onboard the Keyship
@fair hazel what's the planet breaker
I can't even find an image that defines it
Is that the Spartan Assault thing?
Are you talking about a NOVA bomb?
No
Which book?
I'm talking about
Oooh
Wait
Seems like their analogue of a light carrier, maybe.
Y'know
And his was custom-made
:p
Wait wait
I don't think that was a planet breaker
He used a planet breaker in Cryptum
Check the link you just posted dude
It's kinda weird
Phew, that's a relief xD
Anyways not everything in the books has a picture associated with them.
It's the same as asking "show me what Preston Cole's original light destroyer looks like", y'know?
Some stuff just exists purely in words.
Like Hard Sound Rifles.
And Cupid's Knives.
Dude, those things are INSANE!
They're a creepy concept for sure.
Ye but
It's hard to get an understanding of alien tech where I can't understand what it is
The thing that interests me most about cupid's knives is that they seem to indicate an even higher level of neurological control capability than we anticipated
Like the Spartan NIs were fairly revolutionary
Glaxion, do you read many books?
It's sorta expected that you use your imagination a bit.
That's why there's no pictures.
Then it doesn't matter until you see a correct interpretation
As long as your interpretation serves the story
:'(
Plus interpretation is what makes lore so much fun!
But yeah, cupid's knives indicate to me that thought-control might be more commonplace than we think.
Like, devices which read intent and precise thoughts.
So conceivably a UNSC Marine might be able to activate their comm device by thinking about it.
Yea ok so I imagine it has a the biggest ship ever only to be revealed later that it's tiny
You know, stuff like that.
Mjolnir already works via thought, so far from inconceivable
Like for example
Sizes in books are really vague
A light covenant ship can be huge to a unsc one
Yeah, but they often given you a sense of scale
So you can get a generally decent idea
So when they say it's a small or big ship
Halopedia managed to wring all of that out of Cryptum.
A planet-breaker changed its overall shape and configuration depending on the situation. In spaceflight, the ship was ovoid-shaped and approximately 800 meters long.
Clearly Greg did his job and described the vessel adequately enough for you to get a functional idea of what it is.
But in some instances, in other books, you might find that things are only mentioned in passing.
In nthe books prior to the Halo forerunner saga by just saying the name of the ships I knew what was going on
Now I don't
Funnily enough, many of the ships from books that aren't in the Forerunner trilogy only existed in the books.
For instance, marathon-class heavy cruiser.
It wasn't a central part of TFoR, but there's a lot you can infer from that.
It's a heavy cruiser, which likely means it's a relatively large standardized pattern of warship.
A good book tells you everything you need to know.
Their tech is too messy
You just gotta pay attention.
It's difficult
Read more and you'll get used to it.
The Forerunner Trilogy can be kinda difficult to follow though.
It's very... Myth-like, in how its presented.
Some things which are extremely advanced by our standards are taken for granted.
But that's Greg Bear as an author for you.
Is it that you don't understand the technology, or is it still a matter of visualizing it?
Because I mean, I guess I can try and give you my description of things if you tell me what chapter it's in and what specifically you want explained.
And specifically, what are you asking me?
Man I wish Regret wasn’t killed he would have completely changed the Schism.
I guess it'd depend in what way he'd defy Truth.
He already did that by going to Delta Halo and Earth. I would see him siding with the Elites which would cause other species to abandon Truth and Mercy even more. However it could also probably lead to another huge Anti-Human Separatist faction. Unless Regret lies to protect his power and acts like Truth pulled a lie on him to. And so ends up siding with Humanity as a political figure among the Elites.
I won’t lie I which they pulled a Dragon ball and Spared Tartarus And Regret. Having Tartarus lead a Anti-Truth faction or Leading the Brutes in Halo 3 would have been great.
did the didact die in the halo 4 follow up comic or did he die in game in the weird generator hole thing
he didn't die in either
he's still alive
what is he just crippled somewhere in space ?
oh right
so he just doesn't have a physical body nowadays ?
nope
like cortana ?
well not exactly like her
Cortana was never a biological being
there are subtle differences between AI and Composed beings
halsey but yeah I get you
Being born from Halsey is not the same thing as being Halsey
their personalities are not the same
Honestly it's just a mapping procedure that somehow takes a specific individual's neural layout and uses it to recreate consciousness based on their biology.
smarter people make smarter AI
The things that shape personality - the chemical cocktail of emotions, the traits gained through socialization - are not overwhelmingly present in a way you can say that the AI adopts their personality.
But certain predispositions do lead to certain anomalous similarities and even flashes of recognition.
Like how the smart AI Sif briefly related her tasks on Harvest's space elevator to the sensation of hair-brushing.
is the halo ring from 1 still active ?
Its second replacement is.
ah ok
Depends on what you mean by "still active"
That ring can never get a break.
born to die
yeah
Not really
Nightfall
Also Fireteam Apollo was sent there
Man, Nightfall seems to be popping up everywhere today
Knightfall > Nightfall
Blame the Halopedians for putting it in folks minds as of late xD
How can you be salty at a work of fiction?
did Nightfall beat you in a round of Slayer?
Well oftentimes it feels as if I'm in a battle with Halo to maintain the stability of the universe
Maybe you can relate
The stability in my own interpretation, I mean. My own idea of it. Really it's a battle to have everything make sense.
Nightfall is defeating me, though.
Also it's really sad they missed the opportunity to have that MA5D in it change its display to a targeting camera or have pop-up ironsights when the dude uses it without a helmet
I know very few people fixate on that specific Halo weapon as much as I do
But it would've been neat
yeah I can't relate
Honestly I was just talking nonsense
It's pretty obvious how the emotion of being salty, which I interpret as being frustrated or annoyed, could be felt in response to Nightfall's myriad plotholes and lacklustre elements.
I was just trying to play along with your little smarty-pants moment, I guess.
I want to see Spartans hug CGI Covenant
Spartans shoot CGI covenant in the opening to Halo 4, and in Halo Wars, I think
Man those Halo Wars 1 Cutscenes were awesome if pretty dumb. Whole bunch of Elite Minors with no shields charging Spartans with Spears really.
Yeah, wasn't exactly my favorite of scenes.
It was a bit of a cheap way to show Spartans being badass.
Ye
Wasn’t even consistent cause the Honor Guards were Majors in the previous Cutscene.
Also that Green Elite in the Be Human episode of Halo Legends. Actual rank or artistic liberties in your opinion?
considering the myriad of art styles that went into Legends, artistic liberty could very well have been all it was
though there's always the potential to come in after the fact and add canonical relevance to it
I wonder when my boy Thel 'Lodamee is gonna make another appearance.
Tell ya what though
One thing that makes the Monsters cutscene from HW1 really sick is seeing how the Spartan's pauldrons move to facilitate what they're doing
Makes it all worthwhile 👍
Also I know Ripa was a beast but seems like How Arbiters are made and who makes them is inconsistent.
It's a contextual thing.
It's not a matter of "do this, become the Arbiter".
It's really just a way of giving disgraced but extremely skilled warriors and commanders a second shot.
A political tool for the Prophets.
Yeah but it’s like Regret makes an Arbiter by himself where as Truth and Mercy make one themselves.
what did Ripa do to get shamed into becoming the Arbiter?
He tried to lead a coup or something, right?
Wasn’t it a revolt against his clan leader
Yeah. Sangheili internal stuff.
Anyway I don't really see the problem. If you like, you can assume that Regret had the go-ahead of the other two High Prophets to make Ripa an Arbiter.
But it doesn't really matter - all three Heirarchs can just as well have the ability to make an Arbiter.
Further proof Regret was close with the Elites.
He seemed very orthodox, as far as Covenant values go.
how convenient was it that the Honor Guard helmets fit both Brutes and Elites?
didn't even have to call the tailor
I thought they were a little wonky on Brutes.
They just sorta squeezed them on there and then as a power move.
Lol those Brutes ripping the Helmets off the Elites. Also based on the H2A terminals did the Prophets expect Arbiter to be loyal even after betrayal?
They expected Tartarus to kill him.
Yeah but it’s like evidently other Prophets knew about the upcoming betrayal but expected Arbiter to be loyal based on that terminal. I don’t know I found that entry odd.
Which terminal?
The one on Gravemind
Details Thel Becoming Arbiter And sneakily has the Halo Wars Chieftain at the end, model anyways I mean
@stable schooner The scribe was only talking about the changing of the guard.
It was meant to forbode the Schism, sure, but it didn't have any concrete knowledge.
I don’t about that the Civil war is literally shown going on at the same time and cuts away to the Elites being massacred.
Like I said, foreboding.
Also that Green Elite in the Be Human episode of Halo Legends. Actual rank or artistic liberties in your opinion?
Separatist Elite pilots wore green armor in halo 3 iirc
You're reading too far into it.
Nah just discussing for fun, Favorite looking terminal though.
It is awesome.
True Maggruber and that episode takes a Halo 3 inspired art design though theirs also that weird dual wielding tannish Elite
Green is probably the designated vehicle/heavy weaponry role if Grunts are anything to go by
So like the officer of an artillery unit.
Or pilot, yes
I agree since multi species specific roles share colors like with the Spec Ops and Rangers
The reason we probably don’t see a lot of them is because they’re not infantry
I do think it’s a little weird that their naval crews don’t seem to have a dedicated rate or armor configuration
It is, but it's kind of meant to be
I like the covenant and human things better
^ Mood
Most fans would agree
It's about a civilization that's advanced beyond imagining, so the concepts are a lot to wrap your head around
Though in the package theirs a Silver Halo 3 Pilot elite but that Episode takes the most liberties out of all of them.
It has a lot of politics and I don't understand how half of the stuff works
Green Blood from Brutes for ex.
Immma read first strike
The Forerunner Saga takes a couple re-reads
And then the flood
Already loved fall of reach
That’s probably idk, a studio specific thing?
The Package strikes me as a PG-audience thing
@versed helm why
They're part of a trilogy of books that starts with The Fall of Reach
If you haven't read it yet, read it before The Flood
Also Byzantine there aren’t any pilots in The Package that we see personally
Do you mean bridge crew?
Yeah, the Elite on the bridge
Nah guys clearly the most ground breaking part of the Package is every grunt having Plasma Rifles. Yeah I mean bridge crew
I loved fall of reach so much that I dreamt that I was with other Spartans 😂
Grunts can use plasma rifles it’s just rare
I know that I’m joking
Is the flood good
It's OK
I really like it
Making naval officers silver would make sense if shipmasters are typically gold
It's got a wonderful, dark, militaristic tone
Is it Halo 1
But many of the details have been overlooked by newer lore
In a book
It gives A LOT of context to Halo CE and explores what the Covenant and other UNSC survivors were doing during CE
lol, love the difference in opinions
Along with extra things.
Halo 1 from the perspective of a lot of characters aside from Chief
Silver is the color of Stealth Elites though and Ultras are White
Gold > Silver > White > Red > Blue
Stealth elites are more of a matte grey no?
Silver isn’t consistently shown as a higher rank. Straight silver in CE Anniversary in my opinion.
Stealth Elites coming in light blue or a reddish-brown
Well silver wouldn’t be prevalent if they were dedicated naval officers
Halo 2 they have a normal brown or grayish Silver
We mostly only see infantry in the games
what happened to the brutes after halo 3?
What else would you propose as a step down from a shipmaster’s gold armor other than silver?
Some are loyal to what remains of the Covenant. Some are starting their own factions
Many are in-fighting
banished
Yes
The White Ultras.
Ultras are infantry
why do you never encounter them ingame?
But can command as Shipmasters
Because 343 couldn't find a way to, in their minds, make a satisfying distinction between the Brutes and Elites in terms of gameplay.
It’s rare though, gold armored elites are the more frequently commanding officers of ships
i see
Like how navy commanders are technically “captains” when they’re leading a ship
True Zealots are the most encountered ship Commanders but their second in commands are always Ultras or Majors
What you say is true in regards to the games but the in game ranking of the elites aren’t always accurate
I’ve never seen a Shipmaster with a Minor as a secondary officer.
No, not a minor, but a different rank similar to how the UNSC has a different ranking structure for its naval crews vs infantry
It's how long I have them
Ultras are the equivalent of what, Army Colonels?
Plus it’s said Ultras tend to become Elite Councilors so being in second command of ships doesn’t seem to High of a position to me.
Trying to equate Human and Sangheili ranks is kind of futile.
I mean there’s clear observations we can make
Elites are automatically given the position of officers
Should also be noted Rtas in Halo 3 had an Red Major as a Secondary
Strictly speaking, officer may not be a 1:1 comparison.
^^^
True
Officer as in, a Grunt or Jackal Major are functionally squad leaders
And an Elite outranks both
Well heck when it comes to this situation most of the available evidence is from the Games and Elite Ultras are always shown as Escorts to Zealots in 2 And Officers on the Bridge in Reach.
They may not fulfill the same exact roles but we can do the napkin math and make parallels
You think a Grunt ultra would be able to boss an Elite minor around?
Genuinely curious
Also Byzantine, both cases are ships knowingly under a boarding action
I personally have no clue
No I don’t think so
Any Elite outranks any Grunt except maybe the Spec Op Core Grunts.
They would probably have equivalent authority over lower troops but also the Covenant’s emphasis on might equals right would earn the Elite authority
What’s the Grunt gonna do?
Unless his name is Stolt, not a dang thing
Heck are Grunts even allowd to command Jackals I’ve never seen it except debatablely on Sacred Icon.
Generally speaking, Elites will subject themselves to the authority of whoever is strongest
We see this dynamic a lot
Same with Brutes, honestly
Hunters are the odd ones out in that regard considering they’re typically content with themselves serving as lowly shocktroopers
But we’ve seen exceptions
I think Hunters rank above Jackals, Drones And Grunts at least. Who other then an Elite or Brute is gonna tell a hunter what to do
Jackals command ships
What Jackal ships have been shown with Hunters?
The Hunter is going to listen to whoever gets them to the fight
I don’t know that they are but they don’t seem interested in leadership so long as it ensures they get where they need to go to do some smashing
And that undersells the hunters they don’t just side with anyone or a majority of them wouldn’t have sided with the Elites.
I don’t think the majority of Hunters sides with the Elites necessarily
They’re still intelligent creatures with their own motives and personality of course
I imagine they’d be loyal to the Elites who they grew fond of in battle
Majority of hunters shown in the Games, books and Comics since the Schism have been shown with Elites and it’s said the Banished ones are Strange/altered.
I don’t think that’s been shown necessarily, moreso that we’ve seen more of the Elites in general
I would imagine the majority of Hunters period perished following the schism regardless of their loyalties
I mean most of the post Halo 3 Brute groups shown since lacked Hunters. Hunters siding with Elites in Halo 2 was a clear story decision by Bungie and only retconned in Halo 3 cause of confusion among allies.
What do you mean “post halo 3 brute groups”
The only one we know a lot about are the Banished and that other one whose name I forgot
One definitely has loyal Hunters
Like the Brutes that appear with the Sharqui
That wasn’t a separate group of Brutes, they were Covenant pretty sure?
In the Grey Team book right. Plus that line from Buck about Hunters I swear says their mostly with the Elites.
There’s also the possibility Hunters went independent
There San'Shyuum-led Covenant remnants with Brutes.
There's the Banished.
There was the group lead by Hekabe in Halo: Envoy.
Lydus was a notable leader.
There's the Keepers of the One Freedom
Only the Banished have had Hunters, as I recall
Hekabe’s group is far too fresh after the war ending for me to really count that as evidence towards who the Hunters sided with or whatever
What yours opinion Toa on the loyalties of the Hunters?
We don’t know enough about the Keepers to say what their whole army looks like
I assume the first example was the one with the Prelate?
Which again, pretty fresh after the war
Also it was small
Hunters are stated to have mostly stayed with the Elites, as you noted Byzantine
Where is that from?
One moment, double checking
Halo: New Blood
Some of the Hunters took up with the Arbiter and his Elites. Others stayed loyal to the Sangheili they’d known before.
That's about it though
is this post war or post schism?
I don’t think this really leans one way or another
Post-war
I like the flood way better already
It leans towards Hunters mostly working with Elites
so did all of the Hunters who stayed loyal to the Brutes/Prophets get killed, or did the survivors go off to other factions?
What about the drones lmao
I suppose it's a question of the percentage of Hunters that remained in the Covenant vs the percentage that left. I could see the majority of Hunters that left siding with some faction of Elites, but then what was that number in regards to the total number of hunters out there
Most Drones went back to their homeworld.
Also I know gameplay doesn’t mean much but we see as many Hunters loyal to Elites in Gravemind alone as the Hunters loyal to Brutes in all of Halo 3.
And jackals?
Jackals generally still sell their services to a number of Covenant remnants
Mercs?
That's basically what they've always been
But there are a lot of Jackal pirates going their own way post-war
Ooo
No reason why those pirates wouldn’t have Hunters, which is what sprung this conversation in the first place
So far they haven't
Hunters have only been see with Sangheili-led factions and the Banished. And the Banished is noted as a bit of an exception.
We haven’t explored non-elite groups enough to know for certain
So far the Banished is the one we’ve gotten the clearest look at, and well, Hunters ahoy
I don’t remember the Servants of Abiding Truth having Hunters
Swords of Sanghelios seemingly have none
I never understood why there was a faction of the convenant that kept caring about forerunners when they knew that they were being fooled by the prophets
They don’t all know that
The banished
Individual members don’t represent the Banish as a whole
Atriox left on his own long before the schism
Swords of Sanghelios definitely has Hunters. The quote I provided earlier proved that.
Jul's Covenant?
That’s before they became the Swords isn’t it?
No
I did say “seemingly”, because beyond that quote there’s no indication they have Hunters
We just don't see them in Halo 5, that's all
Or any other media involving the Swords/Arbiter aligned groups
There have been several Brute-led factions post-war, none had Hunters other than the Banished
How do you know?
Keepers don't, Hekabe didn't
I already addressed both
Always could come a day that things change, but at the moment, this is how things are.
Absence of evidence isn’t evidence
Dang Magguber why do you want Hunters with Brutes so badly. Current Lore Hunters are mostly with Elites which makes sense as they were the closest in the Covenant.
I won't disagree there
That’s true
I'm just having another existential crisis about assault rifle ammunition tbh
Elite-centric storylines means there’s more emphasis on their groups
Obviously we know more about them
And yes, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, but when a faction lists off every other species it has and doesn't mention Hunters, there's likely a good reason for that.
When do we get a clear picture of the Keepers?
Last Light and Retribution
We’ve only seen a small handful of either
They're made up of Brutes, Jackals, and Humans
I’m just saying since Halo 2 majority of the Hunters have been seen with Elites and the material featuring Brutes lacked Hunters. And the Banished Hunters are a outlier.
Last Light was a stealth mission
Retribution wasn't
Still
And Castor directly talked about what species make up the Keepers
At this time, Hunters are not part of the Keepers of the One Freedom
I admittedly don’t remember what you’re talking about
Ay Toa, I hope I'm not sort of brute-force changing the subject here, but I wanted your opinion on a canon crisis I'm having
So you know how the AR fires 7.62x51 ammunition, right? And the Encyclopedia shows that ammunition to effectively be the same in configuration - specifically relating to the shell - as the modern 7.62x51 NATO round.
In reality, given the magazines we've seen, those rounds would have a cartridge width which means you could never fit 32 or 36 rounds.
Now I personally want to believe that this, therefore, automatically retcons the Encyclopedia and what we've seen - it can't be 7.62 NATO, it must be a futuristic round with a slimmer cartridge
But I've got no real basis for believing that aside from my own logic
Do you have any thoughts on this kind reality vs Halo nonsense?
Full disclosure, this isn't the first time I've had this crisis
I just wanna know how Chief carried enough BR ammo to fight his way through the Mantle’s Approach
They have similar surface area to 7.62 don’t they
Well ammunition size isn't so much about the bullet itself but the casing
The BR's bullet outsizes the AR's 7.62, but because of sick new propellant the casing is really stubby
Meaning that if you got a relatively fancy feeding system you could stack it by rows, front-to-back, in a magazine.
Which means pretty compact magazines.
That's the Halo 3 art interpretation of the round
Whatever the case, he’s going to need a lot more than the 48 bursts you typically carry in game
Yeah, absolutely.
Always thought it was silly how limited the BR's ammunition pool was.
I mean, I can see the balance reasons - with a few well-placed headshots you can decimate swathes of Covenant
Anyway, guess I missed Toa
😦
I'll just keep having my canon crisis then.
Man Looters you are passionate about UNSC Equipment
I mean I love UNSC gear, that is true
But this sort of thinking comes from more a curse than anything else
I made the mistake of joining the Discord of the devs of the Halo mod for Arma
And after talking to that lot I know much more about firearms than is healthy for a person who's only shot them twice in his life
It makes stuff like this really hard to ignore

I don't think there's a correlation between experience with firearms and an obsession with their mechanics in fiction
Well it's not about their mechanics in fiction - I meant, I think at least I've got a quite grounded understanding of firearm functionality in real life, on a mechanical level
Which is strange for an Australian dude who has basically never touched one
And that understanding sorta bleeds over into how I look at the guns in Halo
I mean a person who knows about Guns in real life would have interest about them in fiction Chimera. Even if it’s a little too enthusiastic for my taste.
well what I meant was, this case sounds specific to Looters
Well, I am a bit of an oddity
Just waiting for some Flood obsessed user cause of their love of Zombies to show up.
To be fair, I was a fan of Halo long before I knew anything about guns
Waypoint has some flood-obsessed users
There was a time when I thought it was totally fine that the MA5B in Halo CE could just have 60 7.62x51mm rounds in a tiny lil' box magazine
I'm envious of my past self
McLees was absolutely on the right track with the M7 though
I mean I like Elites and the Covenant cause their bright colors spoke to me as a 5 year old kid when Halo 2 came out.
An awesome way of preserving the classic 60-round AR mags' function but grounding it.
Oh, I was pretty much sold on Halo when my Dad told me it was about space marines.
When I was really little I was obsessed with soldiers, and then I liked astronauts
And then I reached the logical endpoint of being obsessed with soldier-astronauts
The Gold Elite Zealot on Uprising was my Hero for 5 years lol. It’s why Zealots matter the most to me of any Elite Rank
"A zealot? So much for a stealthy advance!"
“Bah over so Soon”?
“Hahah long have I waited for this” “Leave some for the Rest Of Arbiter” it’s Why Any Lore that downgrades Zealots personally annoys me.
Then Halo Reach came and made them Maroon.
I mean, it's a different order of Zealots in Reach so the different colour makes sense
Even Halo 2 nerfed them only CE honestly treated them right.
The ornamentation of Reach Zealots was a step up for me
I was like "now this is elite armor"
^
The Armor especially the Field Marshall’s yeah the color heck no
And CE Anniversary made them yellow not Gold
I liked the simple and clean CE Elites most.
It's sorta a pale gold
Not blinding like the original though
Then 4 came along and just made them Spec Op Elites
H2A looks good but they took away the Zealots Gold Secondary alongside the Ultras Black Secondary Color.
I’ll take a Gold Field Marshall and I’ll be happy.
Basically
I prefer how the Sangheili looked in Halo 2. Though I didn’t mind the armor variants from Halo Reach.
Yeah I love the Reach Armor(Officer is trash though) but their actual bodies(look up Reach Elites with no armor) just might be the worst in the Franchise.
Not their fault they got an allergic reaction to a bee sting!
@gilded mason it’s crazy when you think about it Only Halo 1 and 2, And Halo 4 And 5 have Elites that look like one another. They’ve gone through more redesigns then Superman has in 50 years.
I mean, Superman has never been a reptilian-like alien and has always looked human in the first place
A shame, really.
Why does Halo feel like the least artistically consistent scifi franchise?
I'd say Doctor Who is more inconsistent with it's artstyle thanks to things like the constant redesigns of the Daleks and Cybermen
Oh hey I didn't think about Doctor Who.
Honestly, they really should've stayed with Reach's interpretation of basically everything UNSC after that came out
But of course there's always a few specialtons who prefer the Halo Wars style so I guess it's best to maintain some variety 🤷
At least there's decent canonical precedent for most of the variants out there, so you can pretend whenever you're playing that everything you're seeing is a mishmash of every other style of everything from every other Halo game.
What fun
I just looked up the Halo 5 Elites
Dear god, they look disgusting
This image is kinda silly but it really shows the difference in art style
On the left is a H2A elite, on the right is a H5 elite
Not many sci-fi franchises make an effort to humanize alien enemies, it's one of the things that Halo is really good at, but then they just went and made them all look like horrible disgusting reptiles
The jackals are also a notable change
So I guess the only thing that makes a person a person is their external appearance, huh?
Can't empathize with something unless it looks enough like you?
If humanity ever expands out into the galaxy and meets sentient alien races, there's a good chance their physical appearances won't cater to our whims.
Sure, you can state that you subjectively prefer their older appearance, but don't pull that "humanization" nonsense like it's some kind of valid objective point.
It's honestly amongst the most thoughtless, intolerant arguments I've ever read from the Halo community.
Feel like the fact that the Covenant is a religious organization is more humanizing that the classic look of the elites
Humanization honestly isn't an opinion; it's psychology. It's the way our brain works; we associate more strongly and emotionally with things we can relate to. Note the words "more strongly to". We're not limited to appreciating only humanesque-species, but we more closely relate to them.
In regards to the changes to the species in 343 games, they went with stronger aesthetics. Grunts are based on crustaceans now, giving them their odd, scaly arms and pointy teeth now. Elites kept their saurian appearance, but are now more notably different from the other species. Same with jackals and the variants being even more birdlike, and some having the larger jaw.
None of it is objectively BAD in any sense. Different? Yes. And that's what's swayed some people to believe that bungie is the "pure" and perfect Halo developer. Don't think like that. Enjoy the games. 👌
you ask for too much
In Halo's context, humanization is kinda a useless concept.
Humans don't own the concept of being a person.
I was never bothered by the redesigns and always took it as variation within each species, which in lore, we do know is a thing
The Elites are the only ones I just can't stand
Honestly, I would love it if in Infinite, we see old school Elites alongside the H4/5 Elites
Being conscious and self-aware is what makes you a person, and in any sci-fi universe with sentient alien cultures that we can relate to humanization becomes meaningless.
Of course, you can get all backwards and start frothing at the mouth about cultural heritage and minute biological differences, but people are people.
I'll defend the Halo 4 Covenant's designs until I die but the Elites are just awful
I think when it comes to designing aliens it's vastly more compelling to try and be grounded and sensible than trying to make them appealing.
I've never really looked at H4/5's Sangheili up close, and now that I do, they're a little off-putting, but I can't exactly say I hate them like so many others do.
I'm just trying to say the fact that an alien looks offputting shouldn't reflect on the overall quality of the content.
Especially in semi-grounded sci-fi like Halo.
If you want aliens to all look nice and appealing, you're the unreasonable one.
lol
Well, yeah. They're aliens.
Not even real terrestrial organisms are necessarily aesthetically appealing.
It's easy to design aliens with almost human characteristics since most art is inspired by some aspect of the human condition
In all honesty, every depiction of aliens in sci-fi is to some degree biased by humanity since we inherently can't think of something truly alien, as we have no realistic idea of what truly alienism is
for all we know, actual aliens may not even have physical forms
Given our understanding of physics and neurology that'd be pretty unlikely
i'm just saying
But sure, entirely possible
Ye ye
I just had to get my two cents in
You know what I'm like
the idea of religion is also a purely human concept. Making an alien species follow a religion is humanizing because worship and faith are human attributes
you don't see lizards bowing to the sun, after all
so humanization can go beyond what an alien looks like
My perspective is that what you call "humanization" transcends humanity in Halo's context.
that statement confuses me
It's not a helpful term. The basic tenets of what we consider relatable conscious behaviour are something that defines people, not humans.
it's not very clear what you are trying to say
Elites are people, so are grunts, so are prophets.
i think in this case, people and humans are synonomous
They all have more or less the same fundamental behaviours.
It's not specific to us.
so you could replace humanization with peoplization and it still works
Yeah, that's what I'd do.
because what we define as "people" is based on what we understand about humanity
I just didn't want to be the one to say peoplization.
the idea of culture, art, music, etc
these are all things that humans invented for other humans
Well, our understanding of humanity is synonymous with our understanding of consciousness, and most sci-fi asserts that a conscious alien will act somewhat like us.
It's probably unlikely in the real world.
we attribute them to non-humans in fiction because its ingrained in us
Right.
But within Halo's context, those traits we attribute are universal.
They're not human.
and then the most interesting sci-fi ideas often end up being those that purposefully try to diverge as much as possible from what we define as "human"
like hiveminds
or extra-dimensional beings
though i guess hiveminds have inspiration in mob mentality
So do you think it's justified in calling those entities not people?
I'm asking about my perspective here
Not accusing you
Because I just realized that my perspective means that a hive-mind or a cthulu isn't a person, it's a living entity that'd have a distinct definition.
A person is someone who is conscious in the same way as a jackal or grunt
no, a hivemind is not considered a person because people have individuality
and cthulu is what we typically call a monster, which is also not a person
Well that seems a little insensitive xD
though that gets a little muddy depending on what your definition of "monster" is
some fiction humanizes monsters on purpose
anime does this often
but classically, monsters have been depicted as lacking in human traits, both physically and beyond
I guess they're more animals than people.
yeah, in a lot of ways, they are
They might have a great deal of intellect but their drive is simple.
You mean eldritch abominations.
Noice
"i'm smart but I just want to eat"
Maybe humanising isn't the correct word for what I said. The aliens in newer games look more like generic sci fi beasts and it looks a little boring if I'm honest
- Gravemind, across all time
Yes true
nope
Aww
there's your discourse
Like with the huge debate about classic vs 343 Chief it comes down to individual preference
heck!
nothing wrong with having a preference. it's just annoying when people try to tout their preference as being the right answer
True Halo fans only like the 1999 concept Chief 😤
You mean they dislike all other versions, or only true fans enjoy Shi Kai Wang's original design?
true fans only like 1998 version of chief
you know, the guy clad in green, mostly silent, with a little blue helper?
Hm.
You mean Zelda?
(And yes, I know you meant Link, I just had to make the joke)
he seals the darkness and doesn't speak anything
halerr is a purty cuerl gurr
Though to be fair, I find myself generally liking most visual designs from Halo equally. I'm very easy to please.
I like all Chief's armour equally.
The one I dislike is Chief's Package and FUD iteration of Mjolnir. It's kinda ugly IMO.
It takes everything great about Ensemble Studio's Mark IV, a really beautiful armor set, and uglifies it.
Needless to say, I wasn't pleased to see its shoulder pads appear on Chief's new GEN III Mjolnir.
I like em
I don't like how they jump into the slipstream when he raises his arms
Instead of relocating
But y'know, they're fine
Oh, right. I liked that touch in Halo Wars.
clipping is common in in-engine scenes
I like the FUD/Package armour but I don't think the shoulders from those sets work with the design we have in Halo Infinite
Yeah, but it's really neat when they show the ways that the mobility issues clipping overcomes are beat in-universe.
I mean c'mon
26th century neuro-reactive battle armour
Bits and pieces can move
I'd give any MJOLNIR armour a 10/10 if they find a way to represent ammunition stowage on it.
I like the H4/5 design but wish it was introduced in a better way than it was within the lore
Just mag-clamp some mags my dudes
Well the package has the answer
Stick em anywhere
If it was introduced better, people would like it more I feel.
Didn't HCE:A's Mark V has ammo pouches on the front?
Yeah, but they smol
It'd be such a neat touch to say jackhammer tubes affixed to the back
Or pouches and stuff clipped to the plates
they should just hide the extra stuff in a pocket dimension
What if in the intro cutscene. They showed John in the halo 3 Armour. The. You have passage of time as you see the Armour change? So it keeps the nanobots but you see the progress. And how it takes a while.
you mean in H4?
Yes
What if Microsoft had given 343i enough time to make Halo 4 a really polished, detailed game with various artstyles incorporated?
Tbh it's probably not just nanobots
that would have been one method
Basically keeping in with nanobots but actually showing it.
personally I was more willing to accept artistic redesign than nanobots
Nanobots explanation.
It's gotta be a combination of maintenance drones and shipboard fabrication units and spare Mark VI components
Also that explanation did come before the game came out
giving it canonical explanation to me looked like they weren't confident in the design
I just wish he switched armors aboard Infinity
Spare mark VI components?
Heck remember Blue Team's 2552 mark VI GEN 2 looking prototypes?
Maybe some parts of that were onboard the FuD
where's the date when they give the nanobots reasoning?
In the forward unto dawn? I don’t think so
Yeah. Once you start explaining one discrepancy, you have to explain them all. Why were there MA5Ds and BR85s onboard? Why did Chief put an MA5C away, and then at the beginning of Dawn, pick up an MA5D in its place? Why has Cortana's design changed almost every game?
Why did the Warthog change?
They just should have said "It's our stylistic interpretation, deal with it."
Well MA5Ds are probably like 50 years old at this point
Makes sense if you realize that MA5Cs are probably like 100
And Bs 150 xD
That's a retcon if ever there were one.
MA5s should be typeable now
first instance that I can find of Frankie using nanobots to explain Chief's redesign is April 2012
Hm
I always thought it came afterward
I don't doubt that nanotech is part of it
Frank O' Connor talks about the real-world science behind the Halo universe and how many things have changed since the series began.
But c'mon, we've got the lore now
yeah that's what I found
There's way better solutions.
It's nice that it wasn't a retroactive explanation but it still was not a very good reasoning
I really have no problem with nanobots
they definitely could have chosen a more seamless way to explain the change
They should have mentioned the Armour too not just firm ware in game though
By going with that
Or the thing I proposed
(if they felt they needed a canonical explanation; i still think they should have just said "artistic license" and been done with it)
I don’t like saying artistic lisxenceto completer redesign Armour
Not visual canon friendly
I'd have been satisfied if they explained the first half with artistic license or whatever, then wrote off Chief's new armor design as an upgrade/refit upon meeting up with InfinityY.
Likefoears unto dawn in halo 4
artistic redesigns happened often enough in Halo that I was able to ignore the minor differences. It's not like they impacted the larger plot
whether Cortana is purple or blue or green doesn't change the events of the story
Pizza skin
Metamaterial coating
like pizza
It was quite a harsh visual change imo
I had no idea the ship that's broken in half in H4 was Forward Unto Dawn
I mean it said Forward Unto Dawn on it
But at least in that case we're supposed to pretend it was still the right class of frigate
True
As I understand it, the redesign was for level design reasons, the old Forward Unto Dawn was too small (?)
Even with the different design, it hit the check marks relevant to the plot
changing the look of the ship didn't change the events of the story
The Warthog run is fantastic
if had suddenly been the bow of the Dawn instead of the stern, that would have been a problem
but what the heck were those undulating roads?
but it was still the aft section which is all that really matters
how are those on a ship
They're not
because game
That warthog run was ridiculously out of scale
He was probably just driving through a bunch of linked hangars xD
riiiight, more than the length of the actual PoA
There is a diagram that compares The Maw to the actual size of the PoA
I'm sure I read somewhere that the distance covered during the Warthog run is greater than the actual PoA, or at least the place you're supposed to be driving though
I'm just pointing out some silliness Mr. Imakeeverythingworkatallcostsviaheadcanon
I don't mind CE's level design. Levels like Assault on the Control Room and The Library get flak for being too repetitive, but I enjoy those levels. I think the appeal for me is the same as what Battle Royale tries to do - you're playing in the same environment(s) over and over, but each encounter is different.

how do you get different encounters in the levels?
the same enemies spawn in the same places
Identical rooms, different scenarios
Different enemy placement and numbers in different rooms.
but each playthrough still has the same number of enemies
that's not his point though is it
I didn't say it was identical to Battle Royale.
i just can't see the contrast with Battle Royale
you're contrasting, I was comparing, at least lightly
well, the comparison can be made with pretty much any multiplayer experience imo
They're different for me too; I don't like Battle Royale.
But I do like those levels.
BR may be on the same map but each game is inherently different because you're fighting different people in different places. You don't go the same route or meet the same enemies
in AotCR and the Library, you travel the same route each time and encounter the same enemies
anyway, the only mission I find repetitive in CE in Two Betrayals because it's literally one we went through but backwards
there is a minor amount of replay ability based on what weapons you use and whether you skip any sections, but I wouldn't say that makes each encounter different
You can go different routes in the outdoors sections, or take different modes of transportation. Warthog, Ghost, Scorpion, onfoot...
You say on foot as if it is an option
There's usually two lanes to choose. And yeah, if you're wanting a really slow playthrough.
There is an encounter with a wraith a ghost and a banshee
And two hunters but they might as well be grunts
steal the banshee, skip the ghost and wraith fight
Oh right
I don't like doing that, because if you just go right to the Pyramid, you miss the room where "A Walk in the Woods" plays
It used to be that you could use Rockets to shoot a Banshee off of a high platform in the third canyon, just before you go into the large underground caverns. You could get access to way more areas of the level. Unfortunately, CEA broke that option and made it much, much harder to do.
it did?
What if we see a game that takes place a decade before Halo CE?
I mean that's a best-case scenario for me.
I really want to see more of the mid/late HCW
As an ODST, Spartan II or III, even an Elite - doesn't really bother me.
But I want to see some modern elements of Halo like weapon customization applied to classic weaponry and equipment, and I want to see more large-scale battles from the war.
Modern elements of Halo like weapons customization applied to classic weaponry and equipment sounds like a fantastic idea. And more large-scale battles from the war would also be a good idea as well.
I'd like to see a game focused on the Human-Covenant war with no Forerunner element
So basically Halo Reach without The Package and a different team
Halo Reach is my personal favourite Halo game 🤷
This game that is set a decade before Halo CE can have the month being set during the month of July (so July 2542)
Why specifically July 2542?
Because that was what I was suggesting of a month but the month set doesn’t really matter anyway.
It just seemed oddly specific that you said that month
Just flexing his month-counting skillz
@carmine sleet Yeah but that was just only my suggestion.
@versed helm And yes I was flexing my month-counting skills.
Perhaps in that game, let’s see those following enemies: The Grunts, Jackals, Elites, Drones, Brutes, Raiders, and Cyclops.
I'm more curious as to what they mean by raiders. Like, are we talking about raiding tombs or something?
An army of Lara Crofts.
Sounds good to me
Into the Croft-Verse?
At least 3 different Laras, right?
I didn’t find AOTCR Repetitive until I learned your not suppose to take the Banshee.
There's also the evil doppelgangers she's had over the years too
What I mean by Cyclops are the intelligent beast species who are known for being mercenaries of the Covenant and Forerunners (though the Forerunners would probably not appear in this game but I was explaining their accomplice background). Raiders are the Covenant species who tend to be horned devil-like species. The reason for them being called Raiders is because they would be known for going around raiding property (hence the name).
Oh so this is like your headcanon
Unless by cyclops you mean Sharquoi, but that's a can of worms and I suspect you don't
But Lekgolo are the worms in the cans (I jest, I jest)
In a manner of speaking
I wish there was like a monacle emote
I don’t mean Sharquoi. It’s a different Cyclopian species that is given the nickname Cyclops due to them having one real eye.
So do you think that these are actually a thing in Halo or do you acknowledge that you're making them up?
Ok I’m confused what’s your source For these Cyclops. This^
The Cyclops will have a real eye and they will be intelligent and their voices may sound similarly to the Brutes.
This is 100% either a fanon confusion situation or he's making them up.
But they do sound cool of course.
Ok that last comment confirmed he’s just making them up. But it’s like why not have Brutes instead.
I did suggested those species as being new enemy species to appear in Halo Infinite which I will give out the link to my thread about the new species that we could see in Halo Infinite.
Featured in Halo Wars 1 and 2
And I’m pretty sure Raider fits Jackals pretty well being Pirates and all.
Less "new species that we could see" and more "ideas for species that I'd like to see"
@humble yacht Yes but that name would also be used for this Cyclopian species that I thought of and there are some things in Halo that use the same name as some other things.
In reality too so it's fine
@versed helm Exactly
The only time I can think of a name being reused is with the Mantis AA guns and the Mantis mechs, but there's a reason why they reused the name within the lore
For example, the name “Drone” doesn’t just only refer to the Covenant buggers it can also refer to the Forerunner sentinels (since after all, they are actually Drones).
Nobody really refers to Sentinels as drones
Saying as how their hasn’t been a new Species since Reach I don’t see New Covenant but instead potentially bringing back old species. I do expect new Foreunner bots or Promeatheans. Heck who Misses the Sentinel Enforcers I sure do.
@carmine sleet Yeah I know that because it’s rare but they do happened to be actual drones.
What species was introduced in Reach?
T'voans?
I also miss the Sentinel Enforcers. I would also love to see those return.
T'vaons?
Generally Halo tries to avoid using the same terminology for multiple things to prevent confusion. So while Forerunner bots like Sentinels and Watchers and Crawlers could fit the definition of Drone, they're still given unique names so that no one confuses them with the Yanme