#lore-and-universe
1 messages · Page 209 of 1
We're all equally edible. 🍽
Yey equality!
Hunters say hi
hah
Yeah, but...they're smelly and have no friends. So there.
They do too, the Elites are their friends
yeahhhhh
lol
hunters were loyal to the elites
Yeah how can you talk crap about the Hunter Elite Friendship Ostral
Truly, I am the worst Elite.
Except the Halo 3 Hunters
wait what? why?
I know I can tell from your Minor Armor
wait what? why?
The specific ones seen in-game were enemies.
ohhhh
Though there were more around, just...not seen.
Hunters just want frens!
Why do you think they’re always in pairs?
but mainly the hunters were allied with the elites
Cause Bungie was like Friendly Hunters or nah
Bungie didn't want players to get confused, which I thought was a bit silly.
Painting the allied hunters a different color would probably have helped.
lmao
Even though Halo 2 has us fight Elites with Elites
Like the Phantoms
I mean I could see it
Look how many people still question fighting elites in H4
Or, did question it anyways
I don’t see such questions now but they did
the covenant come under command by an elite
I was like oh noooooooo! I still see people ask rarely
Though the in-game discussion on it was just a bit bare.
"I thought we had a truce with the Covenant."
"A lot can happen in four years."
But it’s ok cause Storm Elites look nasty.
wait what?
lol
John didn’t get the 343 takeover Memo
Along with saying the truce was with the Covenant
Him saying covenant caught me off guard the terminal right below says the same
im confused storm elites?
Elites wearing the Storm harness.
Jul Madama Covenant Elites in their storm gear
It was so dumb. Almost as dumb as that like in FUD
Which part?
lol Cortana can make Chief new Armor but not repair the gash.
lmao
I mean.....tbf, I can kind of buy it. Kind of
I mean it’s dumb but I guess she didn’t have enough?
Eh, everything got altered, even the shape of the armor that the gash is situated on
Who builds new armor but doesn’t repair the gash
Cortana, apparently
Lol lol Smartest ai no more
343 should just go back to their previous explanation of it simply being an art direction thing.
How did Chief get the gash in the first place? I don't actually remember. Was it the fall from the Dreadnought?
Yes
Hold up
Are we sure the gash on Chief's armour wasn't gone at the start of Halo 4
And then returned once he fell into Requiem
I'll go check real quick
Oh, not visible.
But that'd be might coincidental.
Getting a gash in the exact same place
Well, luck is a plot device when it comes to Chief.
🤷
Btw, even if the gash was there before he fell, I'd assume it canonically wasn't, just like we're supposed to pretend that we're actually running around on a charon-class frigate.
Or that the pilots in Halo Reach on the sabre mission are wearing vac suits.
Darn it doesn’t show his body in the opening I can’t tell
You know it bothers me that one missile from the dawn can destroy a Covenant Carrier
That wasn't a carrier.
The ship class of the truth and Reconciliation. Still in 1 hit from a frigate like the the Dawn no way
That wasn't the same class
Truth and Reconciliation was a CCS.
Whatever the Dawn destroyed was a smaller CRS.
And it was a nuclear missile, when the shields were down
Oh really huh explains the different looking beam to. Ok on the model when dying it looks like Chief has the gash already before the fall.
?
Madama Covenant reduced to those
other ships too but yeah big part made use of those
I think that class came into existance because the modeler got the porportions wrong when making it, so they just decided to make a new, smaller ship.
Only needs a crew of about 9.
Great ship if you need to fill out your "navy" with low-cost energy projectors.
i havent heard of such a thing ostral
I'll see if I can find a source
Please do if you're able to
I remember hearing it somewhere, but...
Chief's armor damage in 4 being like 3's pretty much shows the original intention with the armor
Ah whoops, I had it backwards
hm?
Oh, can't link it
So assuming I have the math right...
A CCS-class is nearly 500 times the mass of a CRS.
Thing is tiny.
Basically the guy made the light cruiser, but it had a lot of detail, so they just scaled it up to make the CCS Cruiser
still can hold around 300 personal and troops
Ok guess I was wrong Chief doesn’t get the scratch until landing I can’t get a better look at him before the fall but he seems to lacks it.
Where do you see that?
?
The lack of scratch
I watched some Co-op playthroughs but lighting is so dark I can’t get a great view
Hm. Wonder what Elefen-pattern battlecruiser refers to...
hmmm??
Man Storm Covenant in Halo 4 are just depressing
The CRS class' length is the effective range of a UNSC assault rifle.
Presumably against body-armoured foes.
ouch
Their so poor they can’t even afford the sangheili tradition of Sleeves
😥
Well, they did originate from a Sangheili backwater colony.
And then there was that whole thing where Sali 'Nyon ended up taking over one of Jul's CAS-class assault carriers...
So backwater apparently they all got a dose of Nuclear fallout to the face causing their Mandibles to Eat into their Eyes. What they don’t tell you is every storm Elite only has 1 year to live before his eyes are fully eaten.
They need just a small donation for get help.
Quick send your Credit card Information so they can Get Recon to cover their faces.
In the aaaaarms
of
an angel
I just wanna give a shout out to the Spec Op Grunts for never Betraying their Elite Brothers @gilded mason
lol
Seriously though theirs more differences between a Storm Elite and H2A Elite then Lions And Tigers I hesitate to call them the same Species.
Could say the same about different dog breeds.
True but if they were any other animal they would be called different species but their domesticated and genetically altered by Humans.
I mean wolves and Coyotes are more alike then Pitbulls and Huskies yet only 1 pair is called a different species.
Officially, no.
There's different phenotypic variations of Sangheili, which are kinda like different species, but not quite.
Species definition is a weird thing to begin with.
that just wear different armor?
No, armor isn't it.
Heck Neanderthals are considered a different species of Human no way Those aren’t two different Elite species
think of it like different human ethnic groups
There's differences in their body structure, appearance, etc.
No think of it the way Chimera says it but Lions And Tigers.
Neanderthals weren't classified as human. They were just of the same genus
If Skrimishers are considered their own thing then so should Storm Elites. Then proving my point Chimera thanks for the clarification
Except... Skirmishers aren't their own species.
They're still considered a variety of Kig-Yar.
Their sure not called Jackals
T'vaoan, if I remember correctly.
they're a subspecies of kig yar
oohhh like the hertics in halo 2?
No
no, they were just elites in a different harness
im so freaking lost
The heretic faction was just an artifact retrieval team that had broken off of the Covenant after 'Refumee learned what the Halo Array was really for.
Compare a Halo 2 Anniversary and 4 Elite Anthony
cause they stand upright look at their faces
Elites from Hesduros aren't described as a subspecies. They're just phenotypically different
Bungie made Elites hunched in Halo 2 and 3
true
Which is dumb in my opinion if I saw them in real life I would think they were 2 different animals
but they don't speak sangheili
listen to halo 5 compared to halo 4 elites
totally different language
Can't find anything that suggests it's a different language
Gameplay isn't 100% representative of canon.
Anthony I meant their bodies I’m pretty sure that’s just gameplay
but the pronunciation, etc. ?
easily could be a different dialect
That’s cause of their Brute sounding voices they were given
im aware of their bodies? but could it be possible they don't speak the same language?
I believe it was also stated that they spoke Sangheili in 4 because of stringent rules set by 'Mdama, and his waning influence in 5 meant that they cared less and less about those rules.
unlikely
I laugh when I hear Arbiter talk to the Storm Elites.
what other language would they speak?
Hesduros elites are extremely zealous so they wouldn't speak english
'Mdama cared little about Sanghelios
more about the librarian
actually i don't think he cared at all about that planet
'Mdama was more concerned with seizing and taking advantage of Forerunner technology and getting revenge for the death of his wife.
hmmm? that i did not know?
his wife you say?
killed by whom?
ONI it self it way to secretive
She was onboard a ship that was destroyed by the Swords of Sanghelios, but he places the blame on humanity.
oh nevermind
might want to read Thursday War
I NEED TO READ ALL THE HALO NOVELS LMAO
oh man, if my dad was still alive hed be so disappointed in me for not knowing a lot about the halo universe
He was 67 and read the books and comics and played halo 1-2 and 3 also read the books between those too
so im much much sure he knew way more about the halo universe then i do im still just an apprentice
sorry didn't mean to kill the vibe guys
The Sanghelios Civil War is...
Strange. Very strange. To the point where its events seem completely unbelievable in the greater Halo Universe.
that's correct
Karen Traviss should've swallowed her pride and just read a few books or some plot synopses of the games.
I know I’ll get hate for this but I’ve never liked Karen Travis’s books even the Star Wars one.
Yeah
The first two in Kilo Five were fun to read, but things really fell apart for me at the start of Mortal Dictata. I can't comment on her work on Star Wars, but she did write the Republic Commando novels, yes?
Mortal Dictata is the only book I've never read to completion lmao.
Yes those Mandalorian worshipping Jedi hating Omega squad is better then Delta squad books.
When George Lucas wanted to change the Mandos for Canon she freaked out and abandoned Star Wars
Let's get back on topic before stickr comes in here and breaks our fingers.
True but based on the Definition Of Phenotypes I don’t see the Elites fitting in it.
Phenotype just refers to the combination of genetic expression and environmental effects on an organism.
Like when I look at examples of Human Phenotypes i don’t see completely different looking feet.
I don't think that comparison really works...
We’re talking attached or unattached earlobes not entirely different facial structures
Except... human facial structure varies quite a bit.
Not to the degree of 343 Elites
No normal human has his mouth protruding to his Eyes.
Reddit Halo
Humans don't have jaws structured the way Sangheili do, so...
Neanderthals have less differences to us then these Elites and their classified as a subspecies or another Species
I think people should take issue with the tongue
I wish 343 hadn’t tried to use lore to justify everything and just say these are the way we design Elites
Ok
Who would accept that
I really don't understand what your problem is with not calling 343's Sangheili a different species.
Species definition is a very odd, fluid thing, and it's even worse if you try to apply it to fictional beings.
Besides me
Cause by the general classification of Sentient species by us they count as another species.
Do they?
We don't know enough about the differences in geography, climate, and ecology between Sanghelios and Hesduros to make any strong justifications for or against the diversities between them. Sangheili, for all we know, could be significantly more susceptible to environmental factors over a short period of time than us humans are.
343i by lore, are implying their designs are inferior, except maybe the Kig-Yar

The problem with that is evidently the phenotype is in both planets
Such as in Halo 5?
Jul too
I mean.
It's entirely possible the variation first began on Sanghelios, but wasn't the predominant variation on the planet.
Meanwhile, if you have a relatively small section of the population that is primarily made up of that phenotype that is then relocated, that variation is likely to become more common in their new habitat.
Every other species of Human are just that classified as other species. The problem is the differences are bigger then Mere Phenotypes
And a lot of other people think so to from what I seen
Other species of “human” are our genetic ancestors
That’s not the case with elites from hesduros
Neanderthals isn’t our genetic ancestor
Not totally, no. I have 4% neanderthalic DNA.
Neanderthal genome remnants are in the genomes of many humans
That’s cause of interbreeding
I think mostly in people’s from Western Europe is where you find highest concentrations of Neanderthal genome
While people from Asia tend to have 0%
So again different species that plenty of Humans aren’t descended from
But it’s not the same as with hesduros
I mean 343i should've retconned the design but here we are
You can’t compare the phenotypical differences between modern humans to those of a fictional reptilian race
Yes it is two Species that developed at the same time. I think you can
I think you just can’t accept the fact that elites from hesduros are still just elites
No blargs though
No where in the lore does it suggest they are a subspecies
No cause in real life they wouldn’t be
This is fiction
They are a fictional race
Their differences don’t have to follow our understanding of biology
One that tries to be grounded in reality most of the time.
With humans, sure
In terms of biology, Halo derives the classifications based on what we know
So if they were declared a different species right now how would you feel
Alright good enough for me
So, the use of phenotype may be incorrect, but there never was an intention to explaining the design
Phenotype is still correct, though.
The explanation likely came after the fact since people complained about the look of the elites
It's just that phenotypic variation could be used for... a lot of things.
Similar to chief’s armor
It's the equivalent of nanomachines
Which inherently makes these lore justifications shaky but they’re still canon and we have to accept it
Things don't line up, because it didn't matter to begin with, more of throwing a bone
I would have preferred if they just said “artistic license” and been done with it
It's similar to the "nanomachines, son" explanation, just not as farfetched.
But that’s not what happened and complaining about it is futile
I can tolerate it but I won’t accept it. If they got retconned out of existence right now I think a majority of people would accept it.
With how intent they are on giving everything a lore based reason, that’s unlikely to ever happen
Bungie May have done that, but not 343
I'd really rather they not retcon things that way.
Always feels like the lazy way out to me.
Yeah I don’t actually see it happening 343 tries to keep consistent with lore
343i will drop stuff
And the lore explanation will be hastily made after
That's Halo since 2001
"nearly all Skirmishers died on Reach"
I don’t think any actual lore source ever said that
Unless it was a canon fodder or tweet
CIA said it was a misinterpretation of an interview or something like that, if I remember correctly.
Of course being fair you can’t convince me the Reach and Halo 2 Brutes are the same Species either.
You’re just a difficult person to deal with in lore regard
It was in a bungie.net update thingy iirc
I like consistency
And it wasn't a joke like the CE pistol explanation
It’s like if Clone Armor got Changed by Disney many would be mad.
I too like consistency, which is why I despise Halo Reach's campaign narrative.
What?
I disagree it’s a big deal especially when the new design looks inferior
The biggest reason behind the different looks of brutes in halo 2 and 3 is probably the technology and the game mechanics
Yeah. Fiction is always in flux. That's why a wiki-style approach to lore can be harmful to your enjoyment.
But they’re still the same brutes
Wikis are a resource, not a source of canon.
Halo 3 Brutes are just shaved. It’s not the same as Halo Reach
Reach Brutes are shaved and changed heavily
They’re still the same brutes though
The lore explanation, whatever that was, said there are 2 types of Brutes
Heck I’d say the differences are even bigger then the Elites and being a type of Primate seemly they would definitely be classified as a different species due to the more alien Human look of the reach Brutes
Where’s the source for there being 2 types of brutes?
I remember there being something about Jiralhanae society primarily being split into two "skeins".
Though I don't recall exactly where it's from.
Halo Evolutions
So before Reach
The explanation uh, explained the differences between fur boys and power armor bois
But I personally would be ok with new Elite Designs if they were actually good. Tell me Chimera do you like the look of the Storm Elite Minor.
Imagine if the old UNSC logo got retconned as the logo that has always been there
Would you be fine with it
That changed due to legal reasons
As did the reclaimer symbol
Those aren’t changing back
That's the marathon logo
The old reclaimer symbol, yes
I'm referring to the UNSC
I remember hearing that was changed due to similar legal issues
Ie they didn’t have the rights to it
Nah
Those aren’t changing back
But the UNSC Logo in Infinite is the old one, if you're referring to the eagle
Ok darn that would actually bother me but I prefer the new logo personally.
Huh, never knew that
So then they just made a new logo for the UNSC
If they went back to the old then fine
One instance the new logo was on a Blitz card, it was considered incorrect and changed to the old logo on the final game
Would seem a bit pandery, but whatever
It's entirely possible that any legal issues that did occur when the transfer from Bungie to 343 happened would have been sorted out in the past few years.
I mean like, full retcon
I mean
With the new logo considered not canon
They could just say in lore that they’re using old gear
The first time they showed the symbol in halo 4 was on the Dawn
Which canonically doesn’t make sense
did the retcon the old reclaimer logo?
To be fair, the Dawn's redesign doesn't really make canonical sense either.
Just like how 4’s opening shows a bunch of Spartans with the mod armor
Which was later revealed to be due to time constraints
Stuff in fiction changes. For the most part i roll with it because it’s not really worth the energy getting worked up over
I miss Johnson... he was a super cool guy
I also miss both Keyes they were super cool too
It's funny after the Infinite trailer, a bunch of people were saying they want the old logo to be retconned back in, while lamenting how 343i wasn't consistent in Halo 5 with Arby
Because really, most people don't care about the canon of the design, until the design is disliked
Which is subjective
I was fine with chief’s new armor in halo 4 because i liked it and it was familiar enough
I think the new look for chief in Infinite is a step backwards and seems like 343 abandoning their artistic vision, which saddens me that they let people crap on them to the point of changing, but im not losing sleep over it
I’d already embraced the new vision back with H4. But w/e, it’s a game
That’s pretty true Jungle. I for one love the 343 H2A Elite Design. It’s just as different as the H4-5 Elites but to me it looks actually good. I just want good designs that aren’t horrible looking.
Ultimately the depiction is not the main vector of the narrative
See, if Jul was retconned to be the H2A design, not many would say "but that breaks canon"
So long as the story events are conveyed clearly, if the looks change a bit after time then I can still get behind it
Same, but less about canon and more about "the design works for Jul"
But your right
Infinite's time jump is almost a self explanatory in terms of "why did this changed"
Of course it’s not just the looks but the voices and physical movements of the H4-5 Elites. I mean I’m not trying to act like Bungie was the best ever over here I just prefer a majority of their design.
It’s normal to have preferences for design but doesn’t mean the other design is invalidated
sometimes I feel alone in this world
as the seemingly one person who actually likes 343's Sangheili
I mean there's probably going to be more context and canon fodders, but the time jump helps
You can like Bungie elites more but it doesn’t change the fact that 343 elites are still elites
For gameplay, Halo 4/5 Elites have great animation
Where as I actually like Halo 4 5 Master Chief . They are but I don’t accept it I just live with it.
For cutscenes, big yikes
Living with it and accepting it are essentially the same thing
Though if you claim They aren’t the same species then you aren’t really living with it, you’re looking for a justification that suits your viewpoint
Is there any lore on the H4 - MCC Laso emblem?
?
That skull and crossbones emblem. Is there any explanation behind it
Or expansion of it
Laso isn’t a thing within the halo universe
So its entirely non-connected? Just an extension of the gameplay
Cause their just Halo Reach Animations in gameplay. Halo 4 is just Reach in animations and ai just dumber for some reason. Tolerate means I can live with it but acceptance would mean I’m ok with it.
Is there a multiverse in halo. Like one universe where master chief doesn’t stop the firing of the halo rings?
I think it would be interesting if there was
Not within the universe
However one theory about gaming is that every time you fail/die/reset checkpoint, you leave that previous reality behind to be doomed without you
Oh that sounds interesting
So a legendary run through halo 2 generates many many doomed universes except for the one where you ultimately finish the game
Glad protagonists are SHIFTers.
Then I guess I’ve made many reality’s
man think of all the Halo universes where the Jackal Snipers have taken over
Of course, canonically, these alternate realities wouldn’t exist in that way
It’s simply a thought exercise for the player
Nah think of the world takin over by Rocket Flood
I feel like the only time a alternate universe would be made is if there was multiple outcomes to something that can change their reality
Actually, vacuum energy has something on alternate universes
Vacuum energy originates from the beginnings of infinite numbers of alternate realities. When harnessed for power supply, these fledgling universes are drained of energy in their infancy, resulting in their premature deaths.
That’s silly
Killing alt realities to power stuff? Sounds like something out of DC
@stable schooner a few animations are shared but many of the Halo 4 ones are new
The Zero Escape series delves pretty deep in multiverses
What branched Timelines makes more sense then 1 singular timeline . True their a few new good one like the Grunts and the Promeatheans of course. I didn’t see any new one for the Elites in Halo 4 though. 5 a couple good ones
I won’t lie though as a hardcore Tolkien fan I like a set consistent Canon.
The Halo 4 grunt is a legit example of "wait that's a new species"
For a franchise that's had so many authors, artists, and media formats, Halo canon has stayed remarkably consistent.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/292792533594144768/565364209542496256/elite_roll_2.gif
I don't think these animations are from Reach, maybe the first one?
More then Star Wars Lol But it is bigger to be fair
star wars is bigger?
Ok second one is new I’m pretty sure. First is pretty common among Reach Elites
Yes is that even a question Chimera
Won’t argue against that.
The Halo 4 elites are agile but then the cutscenes are blarg
yeah as halo grows I expect it to suffer more inconsistencies
Of course I personally miss the more human movement of Halo 2 and 3 Elites but I won’t lie their definitely fast now in gameplay
even tolkien-verse isn't immune
I understand the focus on the cutscenes given how they matter more than the gameplay, but there's more to it than "hey these elites are slow"
movies totally ignore tom bombadill
Movies aren’t Canon to Tolkien
You don’t go to a lore discussion in Tolkien bringing up the movies
it's a part of the fiction. It's an alternate imagining
Adaptation?
That’s not Canon and not brought up at all when discussing lore. NonCanon Adaption That does no have the support of the Author
Star Wars has them all beat though with the complete disregarding of extended universe
but it's also been around the longest and changed hands in major ways
If one universe is very expanded and is consistent to each other, then I say it's fair to say it's canon tight, even with entries that take place is different universes
If I tried to debate in a Tolkien forum and brought up Orc breeding pits or the Flaming Eye I’d get laughed out the Chat for Ex.
well that just sounds like like the kind of place to avoid then
Speaking of Star Wars, the similarities between the structure in the RC novels and Kilo 5 are hilarious
Nah it keeps the discussion consistent and realistic to the given lore.
Jedi are super bad and Halsey is super bad
there's no excuse for being mean
no matter how passionate you are about a franchise
Clones are good no matter what, random ONI agents are good not matter what, literally
1 sided moral conflict
“Were it so easy” I’ve seen people even on this channel get roasted occasionally
well getting corrected and getting told to leave or shut up are two different things
I’m frightened of the day Spartan 2s Get Jedi levels of hate.
Nah to be more clear I meant if you tried to start a discussion using movie lore people just wouldn’t take you seriously and that’s just how it is. Though if you bring up Shadow Of War or Mordor you will be insulted no joke.
Every where you go I swear people compare the Jedi to Sith these days.
YouTube, Reddit, channels on this Discord. The Jedi deserved to be destroyed, they caused Anakins downfall. They lead Slave Armies in a pointless war.
two sides of the same coin
both approach understanding the force in incomplete ways
Though only one side revels in death and despair
They do but comparing Jedi to child killing tyrants is extreme
both don't realize that trying to destroy the other only makes them come back stronger later
Some people actually think the Sith are good
I mean, trying to destroy Sith is a really good thing
The feud between the Jedi and Sith really has been the cause of every major conflict in SW
Not really
That’s the Sith always staring something though
trying to destroy sith leads to things like Palpatine, Vader, and the Empire
Then do you suggest just leaving the Sith be?
Sith Attacked And infiltrated the Republic
I suggest not opening up a vacuum to be filled by a worse threat
Kilo 5 author considers the Jedi to be moar evil
Things like the Bendu get it
if both Sith and Jedi stayed out of Politics their could be peace
Bendu was a fence sitter that didn't understand the conflict
the best path to peace in the galaxy would be to simultaneously eliminate all jedi and all sith
Bendu understood the conflict and chose to stay out of it
he didn't want to tip the scales in either direction unaturally
He could afford to. The citizens of the galaxy could not.
The Sith literally caused the Clone Wars and then created the Empire.
But they can’t be destroyed the Force itself has caused that
And while the Jedi aren't perfect beings, they try to keep peace
Even Anakin caused the Jedi to Ultimately win
the galaxy was only put in that position because the jedi beat back the sith in such a way that allowed Plagueus and Palpatine to secretly manipulate the force to create anakin
when one side wins, it's temporary, and the other side grows in strength
Because the Sith were causing death and estruction
And he’s the Chosen one. Until the Sith came back again.
Though...this is getting really off topic
the galaxy shifts back and forth between light and dark in such major ways because of the conflict between jedi and sith
sup guys back from lunch whats we talking about
if they were locked in perpetual stalemate, the oscillations would be much more mild
Let’s be real though all in all the Jedi usually take the lead
im lost someone fill me in?
just a perpetual, constant war where no side achieves victory for long periods of time
That’s Old Republic
yeah, kind of
old republic was probably the time when Jedi and Sith were closest to being evenly matched
and thus, light and dark were closest to being perfectly balanced
That balance is worst then a Sith or Jedi victory cause that was constant war.
And all in all the Sith has what 30 years of total victory
yeah but when you have one side achieve victory, instead of a constant mild war, you get a major shift in the balance that has to later be corrected in a similar major way in the opposite direction
Took a thousand years though
Doesn't have to
but that's how it's been
if the Jedi influence hadn't spread so much throughout the republic, then darksiders like Plagueous and Sidious would have never come to be
if they had never come to be, a light sider as powerful as luke would have never spawned to stop them
Also Rule Of 2 is honestly pretty trash
What? They were trained in secret
Thousand years for a 25 year victory
it's a philosophical way of thinking about the conflict.
When one side gets too prominent, the force generates a super powerful being on the opposite side to correct the balance
oh star wars
Reminding me in Canon we know little about the Sith
okie what about it?
When one side gets too prominent, the force generates a super powerful being on the opposite side to correct the balance
Wasn't that only said in Last Jedi?
Yeah and sadly that’s Canon now
Doesn't really make sense
when you look back across the history of star wars, it's pretty obvious that's always been the universe's response to imbalance
Neither do I
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Hey still lore and Universe just of the Star Wars Variety. I mean in Canon our known history starts with Darth Bane Really
Though I guess Chimera he technically counts
Though back to Halo I’d say regarding Art direction Star Wars is receiving the same criticism as 343
Hey at least 343 hasn’t wiped out Years of Lore.
Master chief is secretly the didactally
Golly
nope
He is the big forrunner pizza bagel looking man
Is there a description of what the pheru look like out there?
The pheru?
yeah the little creatures that started the flood
Pets of the ancient humans
I've just assumed they are like weird cats or something
Speaking of pheru
Look at the quote they used at the top of this page https://www.halopedia.org/Pheru
What cheeky bugger did that
Savage. Is that real
Oh that grunt by the bored Elite
the Meta Grunt
The flood's origin is so interesting to me
I love that they are more of an accident than just a thing that just exists
nasty creatures
i preferred the Flood back when they were just a misunderstood organism living its life, instead of a revenge-set evil entity
I like that as well
i dont know about misunderstood organism but i like the simplicity
misunderstood in the sense that what they were doing by consuming other lifeforms wasn't out of spite, but just because that's how they survived
yeah that makes sense
they weren't evil; their interests just happened to be at odds of everything else's
but now, the Flood is categorically evil
which is less interesting to me. i prefer shades of grey
I mean I personally can't say I ever got the sense that they weren't evil.
Like maybe for a bit in Halo CE?
But then Venus flytrap happened and it was all over
they seemed to be portrayed as just sinister in the games
I've got a real acute paranoia of things trying to seem nice but actually being evil
S'why I always go destroy at the end of Mass Effect 3
i could see what you are saying
What about Keyes and the protogravemimd though
closest thing to an evil turn was in Halo 3 when right after killing truth, the flood attacked Thel and John
but even that seemed less "betrayal" and more survival interest
poor keyes
I mean that's the thing
keyes wasn't consumed out of spite
While they might not have been categorically evil initially
everything was food to the flood
A shark isn't evil because it eats fish
So it doesn't bother me too much
i dont like how angry the gravemind gets in halo 3 kinda seems childish
Some of the details surrounding how they initially came to be are pretty goofy
bacteria isn't evil because it infects other things
Could've done without the pheru stuff tbh
honestly i like that pheru stuff
Bacteria can also be helpful though
well look at only the bad bacteria
or viruses
or parasites
things we don't like because they hurt us
but they don't hurt us because they're evil
I mean bacteria doesn't - as far as we know - turn you into terrifying hideous zombie creatures and break down your biomass or torture you for intel.
I would say that's relatively evil behaviour because it's devoid of empathy
its doing it out of self preservation more so though right?
Once flood gained sentience that belief went out the door for me
Ah but see
I should just make clear that I am playing devil's advocate here slightly.
with sentience, the only thing that changes is how you go about surviving and growing and thriving
But y'know, cordeceps - I wouldn't entirely rule out it being an evil entity.
I dunno. It destroys and uses without empathy.
just a little homie survivin in not so ethical ways
It might be a fundamentally evil thing, or would be if it attacked sentient beings.
My argument here is that intent may not make evil, necessarily.
Gravemind is evil. It’s like Skyrims dragons
intent does make evil
By nature hostile but with great wisdom some have gotten past that.
Well the dictionary definition of evil according to Google is "profoundly immoral and wicked."
immoral
l
not amoral
Immoral means "not conforming to accepted standards of morality."
Doesn't mean they have to be your standards.
Or I mean, the entity's own standards.
an organism just following its biological imperative is amoral
true
Then Evil doesn’t exist by that logic
Well yeah
it may seem evil when it's interests come at odds with your own
Evil doesn't exist
but it's not being purposefully vindictive against you
hypothetically, what if we provided the flood with what it needs to live
would it keep trying to get at us
it would never be enough
It'd still go after more. Despite being conscious.
the flood is inherently insatiable
As we learned in Halo 2.
Or isn’t a concept. Gravemind has sentience he needs to do these things but doesn’t try to stop it
And that, personally, indicates immorality not just from my perspective but from its perspective.
You forget, the Flood hasn't been mindless or animalistic since CE.
did he? i have no idea
The corrupted Precursor did
but lying is immoral
it is considered immoral
Or I could shoot you out of bloodlust and tell the truth about it.
i'm talking pre-Greg Bear gravemind
Which is effectively what the Gravemind does.
I don't recall any lying during the games
consider the flood only before 343
I am.
I'm talking to Byzantine
Ah sorry didn’t join in when that was said let’s see
Obviously, yes, now the flood is actually evil
I'm not contesting that
I'm saying that the iteration of the flood before greg bear was not inherently evil
and thusly more interesting to me
At the end of the day, from a morally relativistic standpoint all I'm trying to say is that the Flood isn't blameless or innocent.
In fact, if I lived in the Halo universe, I'd hate the flood as a result of what it is.
To me, it would be evil, because it is trying to senselessly feed on me and doesn't view me as having rights to make my own calls about what I want to be.
but it's only evil to you because it threatens you
Betraying Chief And Arbiter was an evil move
From the cow's standpoint, absolutely.
but from your standpoint?
But I also don't want to completely assimilate the cows into my being remove their species from existence.
that's just because you don't need to do that to survive
And as much as possible, I'd prefer they don't suffer.
And the Flood don't have to eat the universe to survive.
they do though
but they are insatiable
if they don't keep eating, they starve
couldnt stop if they wanted to
it's like a culture of yeast
No - a Flood outbreak could easily survive with limited amounts of fresh biomass every few thousand years, judging from the installation 05 outbreak.
it will consume until all nutrients are exhausted
And the singular entity that is the Flood - the Gravemind - could do whatever it wanted.
doesn't mean it's evil
Write poetry.
uh oh
see, you're thinking of sentience strictly from a human perspective
This Gravemind could intentionally leave the flood Dormaint
what it means to be human
sentience just means self awareness
it doesn't require being compassionate or developing art or things like that
that's more culture than sentience
I mean, you can make that point, but I'll continue to make the point that the Flood is effectively one entity
That kills limitless amounts of other sentient entities
the flood isnt wishing to cause harm upon others just for the sake of it
If you let your hostile nature drive you once Sentience is achieved I say your evil
if a culture of bacteria or a virus gained sentience, it wouldn't change the biological function of the organism
it just means the organism would understand what it was doing and why
If he would assault me without compromise I’d call him evil
And then it might understand why it shouldn't. But y'know, sentience is maybe the wrong term. Consciousness is the wrong term.
What I'm looking at this issue from is the perspective of people.
the flood physically cant be content, right? the gravemind cant stop? or am i wrong
but if the organism refuses to do what it needs to do then it is committing itself to destruction
No, it's committing itself to limitation
I don’t see the proof that he can’t stop. Flood can lie in stasis for thousands of years.
So that other entities can avoid suffering and death
but that stasis is effectively death
the flood cannot think in that state
has no sense of self
B.
It’s meditation
no
not for the flood
stasis on a human level would be effectively brain death
Flood to me were evil once they tried to gain sentience
alive at a biological level but beyond that, nothing
Bacteria doesn’t try to become more intelligent
Sharks don’t eat Humans to gain intelligence
as single celled organisms eventually evolved into humans
The Flood is a sci-fi organism
Exactly and Sci-Fi evil
wait does the flood have a life cycle or is it infinite?
it's going to have fictional necessities that don't make sense to us
so long as biomass is supplied
Extremely long-lived.
The FSC can sustain itself for very long periods of time.
Potentially through a hibernation-like state.
The outbreak on 05 went for thousands of years before it broke out of containment.
Gravemind could just asked to be fed. Or raise and breed animals to substain the Flood
Well the forerunners also put some samples for future study
He has the same potential as us more so actually
if the flood was supplied sufficient biomass would it die of old age?
the thing about the flood though is its always hungry
They might last longer in the solution they’re contained in
as people we can wait to eat because we feel satiated most of the time
Specifically, Lonk, what happened on 05 was that a containment breach occurred and the monitor decided not to provide any resources to the containment systems.
So they just sat there in a stalemate with the Flood for thousands of years.
He speaks in Rhymes. Hunger they can deal with for periods of time
but you can't imagine the Flood's perspective because you're not in a perpetual state of hunger
Until the Quarantine Zone was breached.
I would argue that an entity that lives in a perpetual state of hunger lives in a perpetual state of evil.
so, people in extreme poverty are evil?
then all beings are inherently evil
Chimera, that is honestly an insulting thing to believe I meant.
and that means nothing is evil
from my point of view the Jedi are evil
I'm sure I don't need to explain why that is an atrocious response.
it's not evil to be hungry
Oof Chimera revealed it my poverty explains my hostile ways.
Alright, I pre-supposed that you meant "lives in a perpetual state of hunger and feels no need to restrain itself for the good of others."
the flood is hangry
Hunger itself is not inherently evil.
But your whole point hinges on the fact that the Flood is ignorant of the morality of people, and thus cannot be defined as evil by it, right?
Un controlled hunger with Sentience is Evil
but you can only understand "hunger" from the perspective of a creature that undergoes states of satiation and hunger
to you, someone who is always hungry can't control themselves because you feel that it's unnatural
but let's say someone loses their leptin signalling
My arguments are that the Flood is A) perfectly capable of understanding the morality of people once it reaches a certain level, and B) that just because a thing is ignorant of its evil it doesn't mean it's not evil.
they aren't suddenly evil
For the greater good it must be done. Gravemind if he cared would try to find a way
the gravemind doesn't consider diversity of life to be necessarily "good"
the only reason we consider it "good" is because it suits us
but it suits the Flood for everything to be Flood
^^^
I don't even care about diversity of life myself. I care about empathy and compassion.
Heck the Flood once at a sufficient level should try and cure its self or end its hunger. No he considers infection peace and mercy
He clearly has his owned warped since of good and that makes him evil
the fact that the flood consumes nonstop makes it just a flawed being, just like what created it
From my perspective it is fundamentally clear that trying to understand and not harm the things that live around you is what good is.
In a cosmic sense, even.
The Flood maybe try and understand, but only to feed and devour and harm.
but you do harm things around you
They understand exactly what they're doing to every entity they hurt or infect.
unintentionally, but you do it
Gravemind Taunting Truth in Halo 2 help makes me think of him as evil
or at the very least, contribute to the promotion of the harm of things
Halo 3*, i think you mean
Nope High Charity you mean
Most frequently, without being aware of it. The same cannot be said for the Flood because it is hyper-intelligent near-enough ageless.
that wasn't as taunting as H3
Also, different scales are important. I've never killed another human being.
but to the Flood, humans aren't equivalent life forms
allegedly
From a matter of speaking his taunting in Halo 3 against Truth was kind to the Arbiter
to the flood, humans are like fish
you could easily kill a fish
esp if it was for the purpose of sustenance
It’s like game on hunting
You don't try and get a fish to kill your enemies for you when they're about to fire a superweapon to destroy you.
especially for a hunger that you cant satisfy @humble yacht
Gravemind works with the fish to kill other fish. Then he kill those fish that is evil
But since no fish are sentient, we never question whether its ok to eat the fish
I don’t help a fish eat another fish then eat him
most people don't
And most fish aren't spacefaring civilizations.
Halo 2 at the most but by Halo 3 Gravemind is straight evil
traditionally speaking, humans have been just fine eating animals
This analogy is, I think, not very representative.
it only became an issue with culture changes and overhunting
but ancient humans weren't evil for not caring about the animals they ate
Like yes, by some objective measure the difference between the Gravemind and humanity might be something like a human against a fish, but there's certain obvious thresholds of intelligence that are immoral to disregard.
Fish don't fall in love.
They also married 9 year old girls ok back then not ok to us.
Or create art.
love is a human condition.
and to a certain degree maybe other animals
but again, the flood is closer to a smart bacteria than an animal
Some Animals can experience love. It’s a intelligence thing really
Dolphins, Most Primates.
the whole idea of sci fi is going beyond what we know
love is a condition of beings in reality with high intelligence
it makes more sense for it to be a grey area being. Its a little evil and its little bit of self-preservation
Heck Baboons kidnap and raise dogs as pets
but in sci fi, human intelligence is not necessarily the apex of intelligence
in sci fi, perhaps hive mindedness is an elevated expression of "love"
Gravemind definitely has a warped sense of peace and Salvation
again, speaking on the Flood before Greg Bear retconned them
In my head there's potential justification for calling the Flood "evil".
current flood definitely wants to cause pain
but pre-Bear flood wasn't consuming the universe to cause pain
any pain that was caused was an artifact of resistance
when a hunter shoots a deer and the deer runs, the hunter isn't evil for having shot the deer
"Any pain was an artefact of resistance"
How cold can you get
Nah, the Flood have always been evil in my book
Get outta here with that misplaced empathy
the deer is in pain from being shot, and its sad, but the hunter isn't evil
I'm not empathizing with the flood
I'm just understanding that pre-Bear flood wasn't inherently evil
they weren't malicious in intent
You know to be fair no one in the original trilogy asked Gravemind not to be infected. Nah once Gravemind in Halo 3 Starts betrayal and relishing in victory and pain he’s evil.
Well that's the definition of what you're doing - you're viewing their actions from their perspective to reach the conclusion that they're not evil.
he never really betrayed anyone
Because you've got a morally absolutist definition of evil which involves intent.
he didn't promise to let Chief live after killing truth
Nobody accused him of betrayal
I accused him of trying to eat the universe and disregard all other sentient life, despite clearly being intelligent himself
And he used chief and arbiter in halo 2 to take over high charity
And that is an immorality of which he is guilty
again, not immoral, but amoral
Especially pre-Greg Bear, actually.
Siding with someone then attacking them is betrayal in my eyes . He surprise attacked them and freaks the heck out when Chief goes to High Charity in Cortana
Greg Bear gave the Flood a fundamental drive. They're a force of nature, almost.
post-Bear, it's definitely immoral because the Flood's intent is now to consume all life for the purpose of putting them in an eternal state of pain and suffering
that's evil
But hold on a second... Weren't they created to do it? Constrained to those sets of actions?
If I asked Gravemind to not infect me and he agreed then he wouldn’t be evil.
Wasn't the rationale for their creation an act of vengeance from a wronged civilization?
they weren't created with that purpose
the dust was originally created to return to being Precursors after a time
^
but time and negative emotion corrupted the dust
leading it to turn the pheru and later ancient humans into the Flood
So would you say that the Flood post-Greg Bear could just... stop?
Nah, now we've switched places.
it's on a revenge trip
It's a product of its circumstances.
and it's got a bone to pick with all life
because it was denied life in the past
classic vindictiveness
intent makes all the difference
Vindictiveness is arguably justifiable if in proportion.
is it?
In this case, it's genocide for genocide.
Hey, I'm not saying it's not.
Though genocide against people that had nothing to do with the original wrong.
But the Flood's just doing what it's gotta do.
but it didn't have to do that
it could have just gone back to being precursors
it chose to be evil
Just like the pre-Greg Bearian flood who evolved to intelligence on their own could have just lived within its means.
But I guess it had an uncontrollable hunger, huh?
Gravemind doesn’t try to cure himself thus he’s evil to me. If he spent half his time looking for a cure while infecting I would consider him tragically good.
not, because in that case, it really was just doing what it was designed to do
A little like an uncontrollable need for revenge, ingrained by circumstance.
the only difference being how smart it was while it was doing it
Chimera, this discussion has made it seem to me like your argument against the post Greg Bearian flood stems probably from a subjective dislike of the new story elements, not on the basis of morality.
you can't understand the pre-Bear Flood's hunger because you've never experience that type of desparation, that constant need to feed
The only thing that changed fundamentally are the circumstances and the nature of the biological inevitability in question.
those are big changes
uh oh

Ok too far but you get my point
keep it clean
Same logic
biologically, any comparison of human hunger to that of the Flood is insufficient
because humans do not biologically require constant stream of nutrition to function and grow
we can eat like once a day and function perfectly fine
Not when this Bacteria has gained Intelligence and Emotions from Humans
a bacterium cannot
And any comparison of the human need for vengeance to the purpose the Gravemind was given by what befell the dust is also insufficient.
The Gravemind is defined by its need for revenge.
a smart bacterium still needs constant nutrition for cellular activity
Just it was, apparently, defined by its hunger.
revenge and hunger are two very different properties
If Gravemind didn’t have emotions I would agree but he does.
Well, they're both sensations triggered by biochemical responses in the human body.
On the Gravemind's level they're probably more an instinctive impulse.
He relishes in his victory. A real neutral creature wouldn’t feel satisfaction
No, revenge is a part of anger though.
Revenge is a motivation that stems from anger or grief.
anger is purely psychological'
Just like a Jedi
animals don't seek revenge
Potentially?
Anikin
not in the same capacity as humans can
Animals don’t feel satisfaction like Gravemind.
I'm not an expert on pack behaviour, but I can see eye-for-an-eye attacks playing out between packs of hunters.
yes, in the midst of an altercation
Human beings wouldn't conduct revenge if we didn't get angry.
And it of course depends on the animal
if you try and steal a lionness's cub, she's gonna try to stop you
but if you take the cub and get away, the lioness isn't going to stew and seek you out to kill you
Maybe I'm anthropomorphizing but I think she might.
Cause that Lion isn’t intelligent enough
And if she doesn't, she's probably not intelligent enough to make the connections.
you're anthropomorphizing, yes
My brain is expanding when I’m read this chat
Gravemind be feeling that vengeance in Cortana and Halo.
Who are you to say?
anger generated from fear of death
🤔
once the Gravemind learned that she had the Index, he got mad
But point, though - the Gravemind doesn't exist in the same neurological framework as we do.
because he knew what it meant for him
And anger. He didn’t know Chief was trying to kill him he knew he wanted Cortana
So if it experiences hunger in this endless, fundamental way that you believe precludes it from being evil
Then it must experience its need for vengeance differently too
Right?
Well neither is consuming the entire galaxy.
He also gets angry at truth for arrogance.
post-Bear Flood could eat the whole galaxy without the intent to get revenge and it would be different
And it is possible that we're somewhat oversimplifying the post-Greg Bearian Gravemind by attributing its motivations purely to vengeance.
yeah because, Truth's arrogance was promoting the one action that would lead to the Gravemind's demise
I mean, for one, does it not still feel the hunger of which you speak?
Nah he was saying the flood couldn’t defeat them not about the rings in that convo so not true
Also by-the-by, you're making out like all the Gravemind's outbursts of anger are these animalistic, instinctive things
They're not
It chooses its words carefully and says what it feels like saying
Exactly
It is clearly very intelligent and beyond animalistic imperatives.
Bear wrote that when the Primoridial joined the Flood hivemind (effectively becoming the first Gravemind), he left the Didact with the knowledge that he would consume the galaxy in a writing mass of pain and torment
Aside from, of course, what is fundamental to its nature.
Well that's true, but it's not the be-all-end-all.
so post-Bear Flood is using the consumption purely as a means to an end
So just to be absolutely clear, you don't see that end as in any way comparable to the need to survive you attribute to the pre-Greg Bearian Gravemind.
consumption is the weapon by which the Flood will enact its revenge
You don't see it as a fundamental impulse of any kind.
no I don't