#Psychology of Purple players
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
@magic trail can confirm
"no reason at all"
Sounds like you 😈
always purple
I'm guessing @magic trail plays as purple? lol
I'm at the point where I just boot them from my lobbies. It would be funny if it wasn't so detrimental to a fun game
Hmm, Purple Henrys...
🙃
lmao
My sources are telling me purple players are the greatest and you should protect them at all cost.
This sounds like something a blue player would say
Once you go black you never go back
nah dude that's red players 100%
@reef whale can confirm.
I play purple
Yellow most trustworthy
You are probably talking about me, I have been known to smack someone when they were looking at me wrong lol.
I do not play Purple, but I sometimes play like that. I like my games of risk to be fast and if it seems clear that other players are in a stack and wait mood I will go and slap large stacks to incite something a bit more exciting and lead to a quicker end game, it might not lead to me getting the win but I would rather come 2nd or 3rd in a fast game then win after an hours slog of who can make the biggest stack.
You would hate playing caps then. lol
I love caps 🙂 again I will sometimes just throw a large stack at a cap just to knock it down for someone else to then attack it 🙂
To be fair the new exponential game option is the answer to all my issues with progressive lol.
Interesting. I think I am the opposite. I prefer the long multi-hour matches. I only played exponential once and I guy was trading way ahead of me because he took out 2 players. That really ended up mattering once cards got over 200. I didn't really like it but I may try it again sometime.
Guy took out 2 players and gained like 7 cards between them.
There is an issue of luck, where you are in the draw order, and of course if you get a set on 3, 4 or 5, and the snowball effect becomes very real,
But progressive you tend to get to a point of stalemate with no one really advancing, or it becomes clear who the winner will be but people then drag it out for another 30-40 mins
I do not agree with your assessment. Sometimes there is a noob in the last 4 but 4/5 times it will be finished in normal time if you ask me. But also I don't consider stalling (in the sense I think you are speaking of) until cards get around 300+ per trade. I think there is a strong incentive for the last 4 players in a 6 player ffa to postpone the game until trades are 120+ that a single trade can complete a full move. (of card blocking)